Deconstructing 'Reconquista'

First off, here's the link to the essay I'll be taking apart line by line, simply because it angers me too much to watch so many lies strung together in a row without anyone brave enough to challenge him on them. Since almost all anti-anti-semite arguments sound the same in the end, it's a good chance to address the entire boatload of these thinkers by attacking in detail a single version of their endlessly repeated nostrums. It's truly amazing how often people can connect all the dots when it comes to racism, but fail at the most crucial and important step. Is it truly ignorance? Or is it simply cowardice? I guess we'll never know.

In any event, the best way to address this essay is to simply interject my counter-arguments in brackets wherever I see he is going wrong, while allowing the speech to flow interrupted where I am uninterested or in agreement. So if it's not in brackets, it's his voice, when it is, it's my voice. Simple enough?:

http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2009/07/from-titans-to-lemmings-part-4.html

From Titans To Lemmings: The Suicide Of The White Race

By Reconquista

4. Slaying David, Crippling Britannia

Background

So far in this series of essays discussing the serious predicament the white race currently faces, I have tried to explain what I believe to be the lemming-like suicide of the white race and by lemming-like I am asserting that the white race is knowingly choosing to behave in ways which will assure its own destruction.

Central to the series is the way Marxist ideology has been embraced by the white race whose societies impose Multiculturalism and Liberalism in the trivial pursuit to establish equality between all races and all peoples. I have attempted to describe how these ideologies are being imposed upon white societies through the creation of numerous minority groups - e.g. blacks, asylum seekers, criminals, Muslims, homosexuals, women, animals, planet earth etc. - groups who are portrayed as oppressed victims of the powerful strong majority. [Who championed these minority groups? Who portrayed them as oppressed victims in the media? Who funded their campaigns for equality and liberation? How do powerless people overthrow the powerful oppressors? Wouldn't they need powerful allies, since they obviously were helpless and oppressed up until this point when left on their own?]

Multiculturalism and Liberalism is being forced upon white societies by force and by deploying a moral inversion that is fundamental to Christianity and identified by the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche whereby the strong and the powerful are always portrayed as immoral and the weak whereas the wretched and the oppressed are the moral and the good. Nietzsche described Christianity as "The religion of pity" because of this flaw and he predicted that the West - white societies - would abandon the Christian religion but cling steadfastly to this moral inversion of the weak and oppressed as being moral and noble.

I firmly believe Nietzsche's analysis of Christianity and his prediction of how the West would maintain the moral inversion he identified were both totally accurate and it is this pity for the weak that is enabling alien invaders to colonise and flourish throughout the West along with the destruction of traditional values and morals that once made the west so strong. [Strange that he ignores the part where Neitzsche denounces Christianity as the invention of jews full of ressentiment for being conquered by the Romans, and that Christianity was always designed as the spiritual revenge of world jewry on their Roman oppressors. Strange that he ignores the fact that Neitzsche hated jews and the Christian religion they created as a poison for the healthy and noble European west that existed until that time. I mean, if he fully agrees with Neitzsche, why exactly is he attacking anti-semites? Practically every important philosopher in European history has been anti-semitic, from Voltaire to Kant to Fichte. As far as trusting the word of the great philosophers of the past go, our conclusion should only be one thing -- in the company of such giants, far be it from us to disagree.]

But there is one minority group that is singled out as being the root cause of the West's problems. They are a minority group despised by Marxists and Liberals and, I'm sad to say, equally despised by a section of British Nationalists and other nationalist groups. The Marxists despise them for the very reasons I am describing in these essays, some Nationalists hate them for this reason too but they also hate them for a very different, convenient but ultimately self-destructive reason as we shall now see.

I am of course talking about the Jews and as a very proud, white British Nationalist who is absolutely fed-up of reading ill-informed, hate-filled and often asinine comments around British Nationalist blogs about Jews I believe it is now time for the various myths and excuses trotted out to justify Jew hatred to be challenged. [If only! The only myths and excuses trotted out are strawmen he finds useful to challenge and confront. The honest and actual reasons to hate jews are conveniently ignored, because he cannot refute them. Quite typical of anti-anti-semite arguing styles. Attack the weakest link -- ignore everything else.] Because if this nonsense continues it is going to damage British Nationalism and therefore, serve to promote the interests of all of the enemies who are destroying our land.

Know Your Enemy

So who are the enemies of Great Britain and how do British Nationalists empower our enemies by joining in with this nasty Jew hate-fest? It is vitally important to identify our enemies because if we do not correctly identify them then we handicap ourselves. Here in no particular order are the enemies who are busily destroying Great Britain along with other Western societies in the pursuit of their desire to first turn whites into a minority, then to wipe them out:

The Left - Marxists, Communists, Multiculturalists, Liberals, Socialists. Not all are malicious, along with the dyed-in-the-wool West-hating Marxist/Socialist raving red nutjobs are the well-meaning but totally misguided and terminally naive Liberals. Useful idiots who provide oxygen for the enemy, an enemy who will one day turn on them too. [Marx was a jew, as was Boaz, as was the Frankfurt School. The founders of leftism, marxism, socialism, egalitarianism, etc, were all jews and their main backers have always been jews. Jews voted 80% for Obama and funded over half the democratic party's campaign. Jews are directly responsible for Obama's victory, and the victory of the democratic party in general, and boast quite openly about this. It is absurd to say 'leftists, not jews are the enemy' because the terms are synonymous. Obviously when we speak in generalizations, we do not mean every single jew is a leftist marxist liberal, we just mean jews are the leadership and vanguard, the most powerful section of the leftist, marxist, liberal scene. Confronting the left without confronting jews would be like trying to sack everyone but the quarterback of the opposing team. That's a rather fruitless defense if you ask me.]

Islam - The goal of EVERY Muslim is to establish the single global ummeh - "fight the infidel until the world belongs solely to Allah" . There is nothing more they desire than the conquest of the West and they are prosecuting Islamic jihad in a number of ways both violent and non-violent. Islam has declared war on Great Britain - unlike Judaism - and presents perhaps the most serious threat to the entire West and and that includes Israel. [Islam, like Christianity, is an offshoot of Judaism and shares many of the same characteristics. Judaism says in the Talmud 'even the best of gentiles should be killed.' Islam likewise says 'slay the infidel wherever you find him.' The religious and racial hate of 'us against the entire world' is transferred perfectly between the two religions. The call for genocide of their enemies and their boasting of the massacres they did for their God and their religion are in both the old testament and the Koran. There is no point condemning Islam if you aren't equally willing to condemn Judaism. Half the Koran is practically ripped from the Bible/Talmud and inserted word for word. Why would people so evil as muslims rely so heavily on a judaic source? The answer is obvious, they're peas in a pod. Here is Menechim Begin's dream of a world jewish caliphate:

"Our race is the Master Race. We Jews are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves."

(Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin in a speech to the Knesset quoted by Amnon Kapeliouk, Begin and the Beasts," New Statesman, June 25, 1982)

Hard to tell apart from muslims, aren't they? But of course, they both come from the same semitic stock, so it's hardly surprising how many similarities they share with each other.]

The Black Race - Look at what has happened to whites in Africa since the end of colonial rule and look at what blacks have done in the US and the UK. Blacks blame whites for all of their many failings and the level of racist hatred blacks have directed upon whites in Britain, the US, South Africa and Zimbabwe is appalling.

Global Capitalists: Note the word GLOBAL. There is nothing wrong with Capitalism, but Global Capitalism is evil and it is causing enormous harm to the West. In this I include the huge banking corporations who thanks to their greed and incompetence have had to be bailed out by taxpayers. Politicians of all faiths and all parties betrayed their people and instead of serving their own people served the Global Capitalists instead. Not content with that they then allowed cheap foreign labour to take the jobs of British workers during a recession. Thus, each of the main political parties have sold-out their own people and along with their support for the colonisation of Britain via mass immigration, are ipso facto now at war with the British people. [But who are these mystery 'Global Capitalists' and 'huge banking corporations' ? Are they perhaps related to the Rothschilds? Do they have something to do with Goldman Sachs? Who are the most famous international bankers of all time? Jews! Obviously not all bankers and global capitalists are jews, but again who is the vanguard and core of this group? Who are the real power players within this group? Are they disproportionately jewish? Majority jewish? Either way, again all we are denouncing here is jews, with a ridiculous smokescreen thrown in-between to obfuscate the very clear and simple issue that stands before us.]

The Western Media - From Hollywood movies to Porn flicks, from commercial broadcasters like Sky to state broadcasters such as the BBC, from world respected newspapers such as The Times to the free local papers, the media is now a Multicultural propaganda machine that makes Pravda look like The Beano. [Who controls Hollywood? Who produces/directs/edits Hollywood movies, either majority or disproportionately? Who stands at the heart of the porn industry? Who owns or edits most newspaper companies, tv news stations, news magazines, etc around the world? Jews! Again perhaps not every single newspaper, tv station, magazine and hollywood movie is a jewish production, but who is the vanguard and core of this group of malefactors? Who is the driving force? Is it disproportionately jewish? Majority jewish? It doesn't matter, the point remains the same.] As they brainwash the British people with a continual stream of lies and deceptions to condition the British people into accepting their own demise, the Western Media have also declared war on their own people. Not all of the Western media is owned by Jews [ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN are all owned by jews. Fox news is the only holdout. So yes, not 'all' the western media, but who cares? 'Almost all' is sufficient to get the job done. What a useless caveat, who cares if all, most, or simply a disproportionate number of our enemies are jews? If jews are worse than average, that is more than enough of a reason to hate jews as a group, just like we would any other group that is worse than average -- like black criminals, Islamic terrorists, or Mexican drunk drivers. Why does this logic suddenly disappear and require a whole new standard of evidence to be worthy of criticism when it comes to jews?] and it certainly is not predominantly staffed by Jews, not by a long chalk. [Who cares whether the gophers and handgrip #3's are jewish or not? The people who decide the content are jews, and they're the only ones who matter. This is the kind of bullshit reconquista attempts as refutations of the facts simply staring us all in the face.]

Now I can hear the cries of Jew-hating Nationalists as though they were next to me: "Yes Recon, they all are, but the Jews are behind all of this, they control the world, they're responsible for all of it IT'S THE JOOOOZ!" [Why do they always assume we can't spell jews right? It's the Jews, not the Jooz. Furthermore, there is no need for jews to be behind it 'all', or for jews to control the world. All we need to establish is whether they have a disproportionate impact on the world over and above their numbers, whether they are an overall net negative to white interests, and thus whether jewish power is a welcome or unwelcome reality. Do jews control the entire world? The majority? Or a disproportionate amount? Either way the point remains the same. Are jews behind all of it? The majority of it? Or a disproportionate amount? Either way the point remains the same. Like usual anti-anti-semites want to challenge a ridiculous belief like jews are behind 'all' of it or control the 'whole' world, while refusing to discuss whether jews are behind a disproportionately large part of it or control a disproportionately large power hold in the world. When will they stop attacking strawmen and start addressing the real fears and concerns we anti-semites have about the jewish influence in the media, the financial sectors, among the leftist/communist circles, in American politics, etc? Is it ever a good time to confront the jews, regardless of how little they are to blame? If they are even 1% to blame, then we should criticize them at some point, right? Right?]

To which I simply respond by highlighting the worst of our enemies, the enemy who is doing more damage to Western societies and the white race than any other:

OUR OWN PEOPLE. That is, the majority of indigenous Britons who have willingly accepted guilt, self-loathing, treason, cowardice and pity as worthy virtues and who have swallowed the Multicultural vomit spoon-fed to them by the ruling elite and who simply do not have the wit or the will to defend the freedom paid for in blood that they deem to be their right. Let's look at this in more detail. [Who here doesn't have the wit or the will to resist the PC vomit he has been fed? This very author is too PC to confront the real danger to the white race, the jews, and spends his entire time attacking the symptoms of our decline instead of the cause -- the secondary infections instead of the primary infection. Every country that has ever allowed jews into their country has eventually collapsed, or thrown them back out. Every single one. Germany did not willingly accept guilt, self-loathing, treason, cowardice and pity as worthy virtues. Half of Europe marched as their allies into Stalin's bolshevik evil empire, standing up for pride, self-veneration, duty, courage and ruthlessness. Who stopped them? Who broke their will and bombed their cities to ruins? Who butchered millions of them even after the war was over in an endless orgy of revenge? Not all of 'our own people' are to blame. A good many of them in the present, a great deal of them in the past, are utterly blameless for what has now occurred. As the song goes, 'if only it hadn't snowed.']

If I Were A Rich Man

The most common smear I hear against the Jews is the charge of avarice, and it goes something like this: "The Jew is motivated by greed and money and the Jew is never satisfied. They own all the world's banks and control most of the world's money." [Is this really the most common? If so, it's certainly not what I'm interested in. My greatest objection to jews is their backing of evil political, religious, and philosophical movements that undermine and destroy anyone who adopts them. They spread poison with almost every word they speak, whether it is Christianity, Marxism, Boazian Egalitarianism, Libertinism, Homosexuality or Feminism. It's always the jews with the most outrageous, most obnoxious, and most seductively convincing lies that destroy everyone who listens, like the Sirens of the Oddyssey. Only a country free of jews and all jewish thinking can forge a healthy political environment, philosophy, and religion for itself. Sadly, this hasn't been an option for whites ever since the days of Rome -- O for a crown of unstained air! What a jubilee our children could have if they were ever freed from jewish lies forever!]

First, if anyone seriously believes that only the Jews are avaricious then they must be barking mad! ALL races containing multiple faiths are motivated by money, the desire for wealth is not limited solely to Jews and to suggest so is plain folly. There are avaricious Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Hindus etc. [This is absurd. It's like saying there are criminals among all races. That was never the issue or the question. The question is, are jews disproportionately avaricious, money-hungry, greedy, deceitful, cheats, frauds, etc? Just like the question is whether blacks are disproportionately criminal, or muslims are disproportionately terrorists. What a false equivalence, what an obfuscation! It's always the same with this guy.] but look at the group who will most often use this smear against the Jews, those moral beacons on the left, our socialist enemies. Whilst telling all and sundry "everybody is equal" they were were busy plunging their grabbing grubby paws into the public purse lining their own pockets to pay for all manner of luxuries, not forgetting socialist politicians who were busy playing the property market with tax-payers' money.

The black race is also as avaricious as any other. [What, are you seriously saying that every single race is exactly equally avaricious? What does 'as any other' mean? Who else is the most avaricious in your viewpoint? Where do the jews score in this scale? Top? Middle? Bottom? Please tell.] The problem with blacks is that they will steal the white man's wealth - and they have just look at Rhodesia and South Africa - but won't contribute anything whatsoever to take humanity forward. Unless of course you consider gangsta rap with its lust for bling and violent sex as being an enriching contribution?

Hmm, not contributing anything of worth to humanity yet demand riches - no wonder African blacks embrace Marxism so readily, they have so much in common. Stealing the wealth created by others because they are incapable of creating anything of worth to earn it being the most obvious. [And yet this is exactly the complaint of whites against jews. Jews never create wealth, they simply steal it from others, using various tricks like usury, fraud, lawyering, political pull, insider trading, etc. You never see a jew pushing a plow or banging some iron with a hammer, it's always the same thing -- buying and selling, buying and selling, moving money around, advertising this or that, but in the end -- never making a damn thing of value. Blacks are incompetent at the whole 'produce nothing but demand great riches scheme,' whereas jews are extremely competent and effective, one of the richest groups of people on earth. Between the two, which should we be more worried about?]

Perhaps the second accusation, that the Jews control the world's money flow because they own the banks carries a little more weight. Without doubt many financial institutions are owned or controlled by Jews but the Jews no longer exercise as much control as people think. It is also prudent to realise that not all Jews are Jews just as all Christians are not Christians. [What a hopelessly deluded statement! Not all jews are jews??? What the hell does that mean? Not all cats are cats, some are actually dogs? Jews are a race, not a religion. Many jews are in fact atheists. If a Pole abandons his religion, does he cease to be Polish? Do Jews just lack any ethnicity? And yet, genotype mappings can always distinguish jews from other ethnic groups -- you might want to discuss this theory of 'not all jews are jews' with said computers. As for the rest of us, we can only stare in wide-eyed horror at the sheer stupidity of such a statement.] The Jews, just like whites, are affected by self-loathing, guilt and self-hatred and are also cursed by Marxism-Liberalism. More on this later, but do please be aware of the existence of JINO: Jews In Name Only. [Jews in name only? A jew is a jew is a jew. Whether the jew hates jews, or calls himself a martian, or converts to Islam, he will always be a jew because no one can change their own genes -- I can't stop being white, a black can't stop being black, but somehow the magical jew is a chameleon who can be any race/ethnicity they choose to be. What a marvel the Chosen people are.] They too hate their own and are going about destroying their own as well.

The biggest transfer of wealth in human history - a transfer that is ongoing - has been the transfer of US$13 trillion from the oil-thirsty West to the Middle East. [Nonsense. The biggest wealth transfer in history has been Social Security and Medicare, from young people to old people. Or the fact that most dollars are earned by men, but spent by women, would easily qualify as the largest wealth transfer in history. Or heck, all the money spent on children rather than the parents who earned the money, would easily qualify as the largest wealth transfer in history. First define your terms, before this statement can make any logical sense. How is a business transaction freely enacted by both parties a wealth transfer anyway??] It has resulted in a catastrophic resurgence of Islam - that's Islam, not misnomers such as "Radical Islam" or "Militant Islam" or "Extreme Islam" - and one country in particular is using its enormous unearned wealth to spread Islam in the West: Saudi Arabia. [Unearned wealth? Fine, but only if we admit all the money we make from our natural resources are also unearned. All of our water, farmland, fish, steel, etc that we are blessed with should also go into the unearned category and then we can see where the exact trade balance lies. Until then, this is just a rhetorical slap in the face. I don't see American, British, and Canadian businesses giving away for free the oil they dig up on our own soil, but apparently this is what we want from the middle east. Funny how that works.]

Saudi Arabia is at war with Britain - make that the West but let's keep it to Britain, after all we're British Nationalists. The Saudis are funding the building of Mosques throughout our land, they are funding the establishment of Islamic Centres in our towns and cities, they are funding legal jihad and provide the financial clout behind organisations working hard to promote Islam and silence critics and who now wield considerable political influence in British politics - e.g. Lord Ahmed who threatened to mobilise an army of 10,000 Muslims should Dutch MP Geert Wilders be afforded free speech in the House of Lords - and Islamic lobby groups and organisations such as The Muslim Council of Britain. With the oil-weapon, the Saudis can manipulate the oil-dependant West and does so frequently.

And let's not forget that Saudi Arabia committed an act of war on September 11th 2001, murdering 3000 people in an act of Islamic jihad committed predominantly by Saudis. [Since when did rogue criminals who happened to be Saudi mean the legitimate government and people of Saudi Arabia are collectively guilty for their actions? How did Saudi Arabia declare war on us because a handful of terrorists happened to come from Saudi Arabia? Under this logic, Israel declared war on the United States when their jets strafed our USS Liberty during the 1967 war. Heck, they were even the official air force of Israel, and yet we give them a free pass. But when terrorists who are not acting on the behalf of the state come from a muslim land, suddenly that means their entire country is at fault and at war with us.] It is the Saudis who are bankrolling Islamic jihad terror groups such as Muslim League Worldwide, International Islamic Relief Organisation, Islamic Association for Palestine, Al Qaeda and The Taliban, those lovely examples of Islamic tolerance and peace who not only commit the most heinous acts of barbarity against their own people, the Taliban are sending British soldiers home in coffins much to the delight of Muslims in the UK who also enjoy abusing British soldiers returning from active service over in Iraq and Afghanistan. [They're killing British because the British are over there, just like British would kill Afghans or Iraqis if Afghanistan's or Iraq's army attempted to invade the UK, overthrow the government, and put in a new one then occupy the UK for 50 years to make sure the country was 'stable.' What an absurd accusation: "We invaded their countries and then they started shooting at us, those bastards! The perfidy! The utter evil of the Islamic world is finally laid bare to the world!"]

Amazingly, Saudi Arabia is deemed an ally of Great Britain and the United States. Oh, and Saudi Arabia forbids Jews to enter their Kingdom and if you think you as a kuffar fare any better, think again. Kuffars are forbidden to enter the cities of Mecca and Medina on pain of death [Isn't that better? Jews can't enter the entire kingdom, but the rest of us can go everywhere but two cities in the country. How are the two equivalent?] and I will bet you a pound to a pinch of the proverbial that you will not find many Christian churches or Christians in that delightful country and if anyone was stupid enough to preach Christianity there and demand Saudi school-kids be fed pork and study Christianity they'd be killed in a heart-beat. [Didn't this article start with the premise that Christianity has destroyed the west, like Nietzsche warned? Why are we suddenly worried about Christianity not being allowed to be spread? Wouldn't this rightfully be seen as a self-defense technique against an already admittedly evil and poisonous creed?]

And as Christians are persecuted and driven out of almost every single nation in the Middle East, only one nation provides a safe place for Christians to practice their faith in the region. [Again, didn't we earlier establish that Christianity is pure evil? What's so bad about driving it out of the middle east? Shouldn't we drive it out of the whole world? Furthermore, how on earth do whites find themselves magically teleported to the Middle east where they can no longer worship their giant jew in the sky? Why is this such a pressing issue for the white race, that we be allowed to worship the divine jew-boy jesus, in countries we don't even live in and never will?] It's the same one Jew haters throughout the West marched against in their millions in 2009, screaming for the Jews to be sent back to the ovens or to the gas in reference to an event in Jewish history that they often claim simply didn't happen. [The two statements are not in any way contradictory. Whether the Holocaust happened or not is a factual question, not a moral or ethical question. "Jews to the gas" is a moral/ethical/political argument, concerned with the present, completely independent of what exactly happened during WWII in various concentration camps. Many of the leading scientists in the Holocaust Revisionist camp are not in the least anti-semitic or even racist. David Cole is even a jew! The factual question, and the ethical/moral questions surrounding it, can never be conflated, and should never be.]

So to those who hate the Jews let me ask this:

Are synagogues being built throughout our lands and are Jews committing acts of terror against Britons to establish Judaism as the dominant religion? [Dominant religion? No. Dominant race? That's another question. It was jews who blew up the british King David Hotel and killed plenty of British in the 1940's. Jews were quite willing to commit terrorism against Britain when it suited their purposes, and they have always honored and defended those acts, even made the perpetrators high ranking officials in their government. Will you condemn their terrorism?] Is Israel - a country facing exactly the same Islamic jihad as the West - funding Jewish terror organisations enabling them to commit murderous acts of violence against innocent people in every country where Jews co-exist alongside people of other faiths? Are your children being force-fed kosher meals in schools, [No, but God help someone who wants to buy non-kosher pickles at the supermarket!] are Jews raping your teenage girls [Well, to be fair, they are leaders of an international sex-slave ring that kidnaps or tricks teenage girls into forced prostitution for life, does that count?] and are Jews waging a legal war against anyone who dares criticise the Jewish religion? [You mean, like all the people who are currently in jail for denying the Holocaust or criticizing jews in any way? The jews are the master of speech suppression and the most oppressive thought police of all. Islam is only trying to use a tool long since put into place by jews for the sake of jews. Call it the law of unintended consequences.]

But the evil Zionist-Jew-Nazis are controlling the world, right? [Or maybe they're a disproportionately powerful group within the world, who have a net negative influence on the world? The world is not pure black and white you know, it's possible for there to be a shade of grey -- somewhere between jews control the whole world, and jews have no power whatsoever and have no influence whatsoever on the course the world has taken. Just a thought.]

More food for thought:

Of the 13,155,000 Jews in the world, 300,000 live in the UK. Of the estimated 1.3 BILLION Muslims, two million live in the UK and I can tell you that along with their 1 billion fellow Muslims they will not be controlled by Jews, "the descendants of apes and pigs" as their prophet Mohammed referred to them, no way whatsoever.

Hate Not Reason

I find it very difficult understand this rabid hatred for the Jewish people displayed by a few British Nationalists. With the left-wing red rabble I can understand it because the reds absolutely despise success because success is evidence of inequality. Since the Jews returned to their homeland of Israel from around 1870, Israel has developed into a first-world nation, the sole democracy in the Middle East and a nation that shines like a beacon when compared to the brutal and retarded Islamic garbage dumps that surround it. [What would you expect? Ashkhenazi jews have an IQ of 115 on average, arabs have an average IQ in the 80's. What kind of achievement is it to outcompete arabs at anything? The real comparison is Israel vs. Europe, Israel vs. the USA, Israel vs. Australia, or Israel vs. Japan. As it turns out, given their IQ potential, Israel has made a piss-poor show of itself and has typically shown itself incapable of crafting a viable nation anyone would want to live in. I'd rather be among whites or asians than jews any day. Envy their success? Spare me, Israel probably won't last even 50 more years.]

Yet the Jew-haters will rant and rave about Zionists as if these people are the most evil people on planet earth, indeed, they will claim the Zionists are controlling the entire world and that they are going to destroy all non Jews. I'm sure you'll have heard some unbalanced individual spewing out numerous Zionist conspiracy theories all based on suspicion and the flimsiest of evidence, e.g. that the Mossad were behind 9/11. [I never did understand the word 'zionist.' It's no more wrong to invade and occupy Israel than it is to invade and occupy the Americas or Australia. It was an underdeveloped landmass full of primitive peoples who didn't deserve it, and the Jews took it from them. Good for the jews. Now if only all of them would go to Israel and complete their conquest -- out of our hair and lives forever. Hitler was a Zionist. He helped fund and support the transfer of Jews to Israel before the war started. No one's problem is with jews in Israel who mind their own business and take care of their own lives. Our problem is with the jewish diaspora that undermines their hosts wherever they go, and stubbornly refuses to leave. Jews, not zionists, are the issue. As for the 9/11 conspiracy, the jury is still out on that. Given that jews have already performed two recent false flag attacks -- the USS liberty and the Lavon affair, it's hardly beyond their moral faculty. And given the USA has lied about several other war-starting events -- the Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, the Zimmerman Telegram, the Gulf of Tomkin, the Boston Massacre, the Kuwaiti babies in incubators, the WMD in Iraq, etc, etc, it would be no surprise if they lied to get into this War on Terror either. Only the facts can discover if this was an internal or external attack -- and these facts can only be gathered once we open up a new, complete, and thorough investigation of 9/11 that gives equal and transparent information to both sides of the issue.]

These are the same people who cannot wait to label the Israelis as "Nazis" whenever Israel has the affront to defend itself against Islamic jihad, a jihad waged by proxy by Iran and, yes,you're right, Saudi Arabia who finance and equip the fanatical Muslim jihad organisations HAMAS, Fatah and Hizballah to "drive the Jews into the sea" in full accordance with Islamic Sharia law. Funny how the Western media and the Jew-haters never mention how Sharia law is the core reason for this conflict isn't it? [Isn't the core reason for the conflict the fact that the jews invaded Palestine via mass immigration then conquered massive additional territory in a series of aggressive and expansionist wars? If the jews weren't there, ipso facto, there would be no conflict either.]

That most people in the West believe this jihad is all about the persecution of "Palestinians" and their "right of return" to their state of "Palestine" that is being "illegally occupied" by Israel shows how clueless the West is about Islam and how eager Jew-haters are to give vent to their intense anti-Jew hatred instead of understanding how this conflict is being played on the world stage to establish the global ummeh, therefore, how this conflict affects Britain.

I have written about this previously but the fact that there has never ever been a state called "Palestine" and therefore, no such people as "Palestinians" doesn't get in the way of the haters. [Before humans left Africa, there was never a state called 'Britain' and no such people as 'British' either. Does this mean a British people and a British state can never emerge in the future? Befuddling logic. The fact is, the recent history of the Palestinian people has shaped them into a distinct ethnic group and territory, they exist now, so it hardly matters whether they ever existed in the past. If Kosovo and East Timor deserve their independence, why doesn't Palestine?]

Nor does the fact that the Saudis and their puppet Yasser Arafat used the threat of Islamic terror to force Europe to not only fund with taxpayers' money the "Palestinian Cause" but also to increase Muslim immigration into Europe and the Europeans cowered and they still cower.

So Israel defends itself against an Islamic jihad being funded by the US, Europe, Saudi Arabia and Iran and is labelled as "Nazi Jews" for doing so.

But what's been happening while the Jew haters have been chewing their comfort blankets [Huh? Isn't this a little much?] and blaming the Jews, is that Muslims around the world are committing the same heinous acts the Jew haters lyingly accuse Israel and the Jews of. And those who worship a prophet who was a paedophile and a murderer of Jews hate the Jews more than anybody else does and you know what? They hate you the dirty kuffar even more [That's impossible by definition, they can't hate the jews more than anyone else, and hate us even more. . .], and it doesn't matter if you hate Jews or not.

First comes Saturday then comes Sunday, first the Jews then the Christians. Then the Buddhists, the Hindus, the Sikhs the Zoroastrians, the atheists, the Liberals, the Multiculturalists - ALL KUFFARS until all of the world belongs to Islam. And all of the groups mentioned in this paragraph are being enriched by the "religion of peace" as you read this essay. [Yes, assuming muslims were any threat to the white race, their announced goal to conquer the world would be frightening. But honestly, who's afraid of a bunch of retarded desert nomads who are stuck in the dark ages? The real threat is the race that has 115 IQ, far smarter than our own -- not the one with 80 IQ we could wipe out whenever we pleased. Who is stopping us from resisting Islam? Who is preaching love of the stranger, arguing for mass immigration, campaigning for pacifism and surrender? Remove the jewish poison in our midst, remove the jews and all their jewish thinking, from Christianity to Communism, and Islam would never be a threat to us. Nor would anyone or anything else. The source of all threats and our only vulnerability is jews, and jewish thinking -- get rid of that, and everything, everything else is cleaned up with them.]

This conflict in the Middle East begs a question:

If the Jews are trying to control the world why is it they can't even control Israel? [Maybe their best method of control is from the shadows, not direct government? Just a thought.] They've already given up the Sinai, they've given up Gaza, they pulled out of Southern Lebanon, they've allowed Arab refugees - not Palestinians - to flourish in Judea and Samaria (The West Bank as the Muslims and their allies want you to believe) and they've also given them a third of Jerusalem. This in addition to the loss of Jordan, half of the land of Israel which was originally promised to the Jews. And in Israel, these Arab refugees enjoy more rights and freedoms than they would be afforded in ANY Islamic country.

For all of this, the Israelis and the Jews have earned the hatred of the world and the murderous terror attacks of HAMAS, Fatah and Hizballah. If Israel and the West had any sense at all, they would kick-out every single Muslim back to the Islamic cesspits where their beasts spawned them and where they and their retarded, brutal evil death cult truly belong. And if they dared attack any other nation then they face the severe consequences.

But we can't have that can we? Oh no, instead, whites join in the Jew hate-fest whilst pandering and cowering before an evil enemy who not only imposes Islam on the West, it gets the myopic, gullible, Liberal-Multicultural fools to pay for their own destruction. These the same simple-minded hate-filled useful idiots who scream "Kill the Jews!" as their own society is destroyed by Muslims before their very eyes. [Is it wrong to fight AIDS when we're continuously infected with Tuberculosis? Or are we only allowed to ever fight tuberculosis and never, ever address the root cause?]

So blinded are they by their hatred and stupidity they cannot see it. They cannot see the thousands of Buddhists slaughtered in Thailand. The millions of Hindus slaughtered in India - who also lost a large part of its land to Muslims. They cannot see the extermination of the Zoroastrians and Bahias in Iran. They cannot see the Jews murdered by suicide bombers in Israel or Jewish children cowering in fear from rocket attacks deliberately launched at them as they are on their way to school but they're Jews so who cares and besides, those "poor oppressed Palestinians" are only firing piddling little fireworks right? Nor can they see the thousands of Christians executed and mutilated in Iraq, Pakistan, Indonesia, Turkey, Egypt, Nigeria, Somalia, The Sudan. [Are they white Christians? If they aren't white Christians, why the hell should we care?]

Of course they can't because IT'S THE JOOZ innit?

Please. Instead of hating the Jews, let's wake up to the very real nightmare of Islamic jihad before it's too late. [How are we going to wake up when Jews still control the media and still preach nothing but love and tolerance and political correctness from dawn to dusk? Isn't this putting the cart before the horse?]

Lessons From History

One aspect surrounding Jew-hatred involves a quite nauseating and frankly misguided admiration of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany. I have read on various Nationalist blogs comments about Adolf Hitler being some kind of champion for the white race. This is the same Adolf Hitler whose insanity [What credible historian thinks Hitler was insane?] caused the deaths of millions of whites right after millions of whites had been slaughtered on the killing fields of France and Belgium just 20 years previous. [Wasn't it France and Britain who declared war on Germany? Who exactly caused the deaths of all those millions? We're the ones who firebombed Dresden.]

But many of the people making these comments do not seem to understand that Hitler was not about "White supremacy" but Aryan supremacy. He held all other races - including Anglo-Saxons, Celts and Picts [Bullshit, Hitler had a deep admiration for Britain and never wanted to go to war with the UK. He never once categorized the British people as inferior.]- as biologically inferior to the Nordic Aryan [You idiot, anglo-saxons ARE nordic aryans] and would've had no trouble at all in exterminating inferior non-Aryan races [Considering he had no such plans or statements to that effect, this is quite a stretch, don't you think?]- who many of these Hitler admirers belong to - but why let facts spoil a good "sieg heil" from these misguided, wannabee Nazis.

There are also the questions surrounding the Holocaust, those who deny it ever took place and those who like to have a pissing contest [Huh? So it doesn't matter whether 1 million or 6 million died due to an unplanned accident or a planned brutal homicidal campaign intent on genocide? That's just a pissing contest?] about what the real numbers of victims actually were. But whose history is being denied here - is it solely the Jewish history? [Not at all, I also deny the soviet history that claimed Katyn was done by the Nazis. The Soviets lied about that, just like they lied about the Holocaust, just like they lied and pretended they were victims of WWII when they had already drawn up attack plans on Germany and were marshaling their forces for an attack into Europe themselves before Hitler's preemptive strike got a leg up on them.]

Most definitely not because it also denies British, American, Canadian, Polish and Russian histories because it was their soldiers who liberated the death camps [Only Russians ever liberated 'death camps.' Every camp freed in the west was a concentration camp with absolutely no gassings. All Holocaust scholars agree there were no gas chambers or gassings in any of the camps liberated by non-Russians.] and who the deniers accuse as "liars". [I only really need to accuse the Russians of lying, something the Soviet Union constantly did throughout its history.] Are we seriously to believe that after almost a year of heavy and intense fighting the allies and the Russians decided to embark on such a grand deception? And how convenient of them all to agree, along with the support of the International Red Cross [What are you talking about? The Red Cross reported over and over again the concentration camps were humane and the nazis weren't conducting a genocidal campaign against the jews], the International media [you mean the jewish dominated media?], the citizens imprisoned in the camps [you mean jews?] and of course, the Nazis and the German people [you mean the Germans tortured into confessions before being hanged?], including those who committed the atrocities and those who witnessed them along with those white Germans who were victims of their own master race.

Isn't it a tad odd that only this aspect of WWII is denied? There is no denial of British WWII history: Dunkirk, The Blitz, Arnhem, D-Day, or the dreadful abuse endured by allied POWs in Japanese camps. [Yes, because all of these things are well documented, with video evidence, actual corpses, and so on. All we have for the Holocaust is eye witness testimony that claims all the corpses of this awful atrocity were turned to ash and dumped into a river, all the documents detailing the massacre were burned or written in code, etc. We have zero physical evidence of the Holocaust, we have all the evidence we need of every other event during WWII. Why shouldn't we doubt people who only offer their own 'word' as proof of such a heinous and unfeasible claim?] Only the "Jewish" holocaust - Jewish history - is denied. And along with denying the "Jewish Holocaust", the history of other victims is denied too. Ignored by these Jew haters are the 4 million other victims of the Nazis: Gypsies, Slavs, the mentally and physically handicapped, the political dissenters, Christians, members of the white race including women just take the camp at Ravensbrueck, where Jewish prisoners were the minority, as being one notorious example from the 55,000 concentration camps established by the Nazis throughout Europe. Kind of all those European nations to play an active part in creating this "Jewish Myth". [No one denies concentration camps -- America also had concentration camps. The question is whether the jews were gassed in genocide death camps or not. That is the unique evil of the Holocaust, everything else is completely unimportant.]

That number doesn't include the death camp at Jasenovac, run by the Croatian Ustashe, the beloved allies of the Nazis. I wonder if this is denied too? If so, we can add the Serbs to our growing list of liars and deceivers.

What is telling for me about the Holocaust is that those who perpetrated it didn't deny it, indeed, many were defiant about it to the end, monsters such as Irme Grese and Adolf Eichmann. [Eichmann? Who confessed to ridiculous things after being tortured at the hands of Israelis? Give me a break.] The trial of Klaus Barbie in France in the late 1980's also re-enforced this because the prosecution didn't deny that he'd committed war crimes but that those who aided him were still at large in the very government that was prosecuting him.

One thing I will agree on with the Jew haters is that the Jews have hijacked the holocaust and depicted it as solely an atrocity committed against Jews when it most certainly was not and stating so does not diminish from what the Jews suffered but by hijacking it they diminish the suffering of other races and peoples and I condemn them without reservation for it. [Gee. thanks. Could you also condemn them for pretending the Holocaust was the worst slaughter in history, even though Stalin, Mao, Japan, Ghengis Khan, Islam's Jihads and the Aztecs all did far worse? Could you condemn them for shoving the Holocaust down white children's throats who never did these crimes, aren't even related to anyone who did these crimes, and yet are taught from age five up to feel guilty for them?]

Another accusation thrown at those who defend the Jews is one of re-writing history, an accusation I find somewhat amusing. If the Jews have been such a threat throughout British history and they damaged Great Britain so badly, well how did Great Britain manage to build the greatest Empire the world has ever seen? [You do realize that British people also rose up and massacred the jews in Britain throughout British history, and that British monarchs seized jewish property and even expelled all jews from England for centuries? Perhaps the British Empire didn't tolerate jewish malfeasance back then as much as they do now.]

Yet these are the people who vote for the British National Party because they want to make Britain great again! I'm really glad they feel this way, I do too but I wish they'd drop this glaring contradiction. The British Empire was so mighty because it was built largely on Judeo-Christian foundations [No, it was mighty because it was built on anglo-saxon foundations, combined with the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution. Those two filthy religions were never of any use to Britain at all.] and let's remember that the systems of commerce that brought trade all around the Empire and contributed to Britain's wealth were developed in the main by Jews. [Hello? Adam Smith?]

Blame Game

When discussing the current dire situation the West is now in, the blame for the situation is always laid at the door of the Jews. When it comes to Marxism, Jew haters will claim Marx was a Jew but fail to mention that his family had converted to Lutheran Christianity. [That's because Jew is a race, not a religion.] But Marx isn't the only figure to have influenced the left, the philosophy of Antonio Gramsci, founding member of the Italian Communist Party is also greatly admired by the leftards and he was not a Jew.

Jew haters conveniently blame the Jews for the current situation the West is in and will claim Multiculturalism for example, has been imposed upon the West by the ruling Jewish elite who want to destroy the West. I reject this absolutely. Jews are not responsible for the nightmare of Multiculturalism and to single out one race for blame is ridiculous. Are some Jews involved in enforcing Multiculturalism? Of course. But there are also blacks, Asians, Orientals, Arabs and of course whites including leading Christians who are all involved in inflicting this unnatural and destructive social experiment upon the British people. [But who is at the vanguard? Who is disproportionately represented? Who forms the hardened core of the enemy? Who has the intelligence to actually be dangerous?]

But the elite who are imposing Multiculturalism in Great Britain have only been able to do so because the majority of the British people have chosen to accept it. In addition to the malicious - the Marxists and the Socialists - there have been the naive Liberals who went along with it because they truly believe in the fantasy of a rainbow utopia, a Shangria-La where the lion lies down with the lamb, where all of the races live side-by-side in peace and tranquillity. All races that is except the Jews because they'd only spoil it no doubt.

I'm sure Jew-haters will now say something like: "Yes, but these naive fools have been betrayed and lied to, they trusted those who brainwashed them and those doing the brainwashing are the Jews."

To which I say: Ignorance is not an excuse for stupidity and it isn't just the Jews who are doing the brainwashing, other races have noticed the suicidal stupidity of the West and are busy exploiting it.

This last point is absolutely crucial to this essay and is something every British Nationalist I believe needs to have a very clear awareness of. Blaming the Jews is nothing more than an excuse, it is an opt-out, a get-out-of-jail card that absolves our own people from the responsibility of the mess THEY have created. Throughout these essays I have tried to explain how the white race is behaving in ways that fly in the face of nature by WILLINGLY accepting the Multicultural ideology, indeed many British people - and of the white race as a whole - are amongst the most vehement defenders of this destructive and unnatural ideology.

Let me make it clear: The Jews didn't force Britons to gorge themselves on porn, to sink themselves into ever-increasing debt, to consume with insatiable greed the cheap foreign goods that flooded Britain. The Jews didn't force Britons to watch their Hollywood movies, to read Jewish and Marxist-Liberal propaganda through their media and the Jews didn't force anybody to vote for corrupt, devious, treacherous and avaricious politicians - politicians who come from a variety of backgrounds - native Brits, Catholics, Protestants, atheists, blacks, Muslims and Jews. The Jews didn't vote them in and what these traitors have done to their own people wasn't solely conducted by Jews and it has caused Britain far more harm than any other race has, including the Jews. [Force or fraud, it's the same either way. Jews lie, people die.]

Clear evidence of this was provided in a timely manner by the good people of Norwich in the recent by-election. In a year where the economy has collapsed, where taxpayers bailed out the banks, where slave ships returned to British ports and where the sickening greed of politicians from the lib/lab/con one party con-trick was exposed for all to see - ironically, in the Jew-controlled media - these rational and intelligent Britons did what they have always done and voted for these incompetent, greedy, self-serving, duplicitous thieves in their thousands. The Jews didn't put a gun to their heads to make them vote this way, they voted willingly and in full knowledge of what the politicians had done to them. [After fifty years of being conditioned that racism and anti-semitism were the worst crimes on earth, who exactly is left to vote for their own rational self-interest? Who hasn't been brainwashed to self-destruct via the education system, holocaust literature, social ostracism, peer pressure and the lying media to vote the wrong way? Voters can't help voting the wrong way when they are fed lies and threats from the day they're born to never, ever vote BNP. It takes people with great wit and great will to oppose such forces, usually at great cost to their own personal lives. It's a miracle anyone votes BNP, expecting everyone to do so is just ridiculous.]

In the last essay, I discussed Einstein's definition of insanity and applied it to the behaviour of the white race. And Norwich provided the perfect example of people doing the same things over and over again and expecting different results. It is absolute insanity, no question about it.

The Jews are infected with this suicidal madness too, Jews like George Soros and the anti-Israel "Jewish" lobby group J-Street who continue to make demands on tiny Israel to give up its land to the Arabs in return for a non-existent peace. In so doing, these juicidal Jews are aiding the current global Islamic jihad and they are far more useful to the enemy than any other Jew.

Diverting Attention

Blaming the Jews doesn't just detract from the root cause of the problem - the suicidal stupidity of the majority of the white race [And yet we can't help being stupid. Intelligence is genetic and we are stuck with a 100 IQ average, 15 points behind jews who can therefore lie and lie and lie and we'll never catch on. I've endorsed eugenics to get rid of our suicidal stupidity. How about you? In the meantime, what do you propose to do about it? Continue getting taken advantage of by high IQ lying jews for another couple centuries and hope we somehow survive to see the eugenics program bear fruit?]- it also diverts attention greatly from the responsibility other races bear for the grave damage they have maliciously inflicted upon Great Britain. Races such as the African and the Afro-Caribbean black, parasites who have invaded our nation, sponged off our welfare system, introduced their retarded culture including gang culture with its drug abuse and tribal violence. Then there are blacks who've made careers out of being black, blaming the white race for all of the many failings of blacks and screaming "WAYCISS" at anyone who disagrees with them, demanding more and more "positive discrimination" to handicap the native Briton so the black invader prospers - at the expense of the now weakened indigenous Briton.

Blacks never accept responsibility for their failures, they always blame another race, another tribe, another person for their own short-comings and I reject this absolutely. Blaming the Jews is exactly the same as blacks blaming the whites and throughout the West, [It's not exactly the same, for the precise reason that we are telling the truth, but they are lying. Suppose a girl claimed her life had been devastated by the continuous sexual molestation her step-father had done to her as a kid, but it turned out to be completely false and he was innocent. Now another girl says the exact same thing, but this time we have dna evidence, video tapes, and it's absolutely certain she's telling the truth. Is her accusation the exact same? Is she on the same level as the girl who lied and has no excuse for her emotional problems? Or is she allowed to protest abuse and injustice and ask for help against the pain that has been inflicted on her? Apparently not, according to Reconquista.] blacks are using the hate-crime of racism to colonise us whilst deceitfully blaming whites for the mess Africa is in.

Yet back in the lands of Africa, the whites have been almost ethnically cleansed from Zimbabwe, the Boers are facing an ongoing genocide and whites in South Africa are facing an escalating violent and anti-white racist crime-wave. All in addition to the appalling horrors blacks inflict on their own people. The behaviour of blacks has nothing to do with the Jews, blacks and blacks alone are responsible and nothing should distract from that uncomfortable truth.

Along with many other parasitical races who see Great Britain and the British people as a life-support system, who invade our land, grab as much as they can and give little if anything in return, these white-hating invaders present a much more serious threat than the Jews and we shouldn't allow ourselves to be distracted from that. [Jewish parasitism is much more insidious because it doesn't just stop at your money. It seeps into your very brains and makes you want to serve jews -- witness the evangelical christians who would do anything for God's chosen people and Israel -- or this very author who would do anything to excuse jews for the many sins they've committed against our people. A nation can survive its fools and even its ambitious, but it can never survive treason from within.]

Conclusion

Blaming the Jews for the plight of the white race will only render British Nationalists powerless. [That may be true, that's certainly why Nick Griffen gave up talking about the jews, even though he knows the score. Nick Griffen denied the Holocaust and hung out with David Duke/Don Black in the past, but now he sings the merry old tune that Jews are the best thing since sliced bread. This is obviously just a tactical maneuver, but you seem so stupid that you actually believe in it. I don't believe any political party will ever succeed that doesn't tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. But in any event, we should agree to at least not tell lies. A healthy blanket of silence, a complete refusal to comment one way or the other, is infinitely preferable to lying and groveling at the feet of our jewish handlers. Have some self-respect, at least enough dignity to say nothing at all. Don't attack us on the right with the courage and sacrifice that dared to oppose the most powerful people on Earth, for your sake, not our own.] The Jews are not responsible for this situation, whites are. The sooner we accept this, the sooner we accept that we are responsible for what has happened and therefore we accept that we and we alone are responsible for getting ourselves out of it. Blame is an excuse and an admittance of inferiority and there is no way I will ever admit that I as a white man - a proud white Briton - will ever admit anyone from any other race is superior to my own and that includes the Jews. [I'll readily admit a group is superior to me, if they are superior to my group. It's only objectively fair. However, jews are only superior at lying, at ruthlessness, at cheating, and other such traits. Their intelligence is largely used for one purpose -- how to lie, cheat, and poison everyone around them. I hardly want to be superior to Jews in this field, and therefore I quite readily cede the entire field to them. Who wants to be the best evil doers on earth? They can have it. The white race is the greatest race on earth, when it comes to things that matter. Our love of truth, our love of love, and our love of beauty is absolutely unparalleled. Our contributions to all three fields are absolutely unmatched. Just read Human Accomplishment if you have any doubts. Blacks can run faster all they want, and Jews can lie better all they want, I'm content with what I have, the most moral race on earth.]

What I resent the most when I read Jew-hating comments on BNP supporting blogs is the damage that they do to the efforts of all the BNP supporters and activists who are working tirelessly and determinedly to try and save our country and our people from being destroyed. All of their good work can be scuppered in a moment, all undermined by this crass and self-destructive hatred of a people who do not present anywhere near the level of threat to Britain as either Islam or mass immigration or the EU. Yes I know some comments are left by the red retards who will do anything to damage the cause of British Nationalism but still Jew-hating nationalists remain. This Jew hatred turns people off from the more important message that the BNP are trying to promote: That Britain is for the British people, that the British people have a right to their identity and their nation and the world has to accept this.

Those who do not are our enemies no matter what race, creed or colour they are and that includes those who have placed our people in great peril: The white race themselves.


*************************************************************************************

Racism is pretty well established, but anti-semitism is still hotly debated. I don't think anyone needs another article proving blacks are stupid, Islam is evil, or Mexicans are drug dealers. The only topic that still seems up in the air, among all the racist circles of the world, is the precise role and place of Jews in all this. Because jews are intelligent and gain most of their money through legal, though not moral, means, whites are continuously deluded into thinking they are a benign or positive enrichment in our lives. Nothing could be further from the truth. The same horrible catastrophe that struck Weimar Germany, Soviet Russia, Rome and Egypt will strike us down too. It's only a matter of time. We can fight AIDS or TB, the primary infection or endless secondary infections, the root cause, or the symptoms. One way, we at least have a chance at victory. The other way, we are doomed to die. How hard a choice can this be?

It's the Jews, Stupid!

http://cofcc.org/?p=5715

Everyone should check out this excellent post at the Council of Conservative Citizens website.

Both videos are short and sharp at making their points.

I'm not convinced that a low fertility rate is particularly bad. The black plague killed off 1/3 of Europeans, but the population quickly rebounded, because population is tied to food production (and more recently energy + food production), not the amount of child bearing age women. Women can have 13 children a piece if they wanted, it doesn't matter if whites are reduced to a tiny scattering of a few million, we could rebound to billions soon enough. The bottleneck is not the ability to reproduce, it is and always has been the wealth to support said children.

So long as we keep control of our government and territory, all of our wealth will belong to us. This wealth can translate into bundles of bright bubbly babies whenever we want. If we lose control of our government, all our wealth will be diverted to our new ruling class -- if we lose control of territory, its natural resources will be exploited to the benefit of others. Those are the two permanent threats to white population levels. Once you lose these things, your population is permanently reduced, not temporarily, because the wealth can never be retrieved.

The presence of minorities presents no threat to the wealth of the majority so long as they don't seize our territory or government. This is why people largely see no harm in tolerating minorities and think we are jumping at shadows and crying wolf. The problem is minorities tend to cluster into ghettos where they form the majority. At this point, they seize control of the local government and the local territory, and drive all the whites out by crime, unjust tax policies, or simply dirty looks and an inability to find friends or lovers. If every single black, hispanic, or muslim minority were distributed evenly across the country, to be a harmless 20% block in every neighborhood, they really could be seen as some sort of diverse colorful vibrant enrichment of the otherwise pasty bland routine. When they become 60, 70, or 90% of the population, the calculation shifts violently to a desperate fight for survival, ala Zimbabwe or South Africa. What a quick transition this can be! One decade all your diverse friends and neighbors are as cute as buttons and harmless as kitty cats -- the next decade they are rioting, raping, and voting in a communist party that seizes all your land and income. What happened? I thought we were such great friends! I'll tell you what happened -- the one law of diversity politics is "Who? Whom?" Minorities know they have to bide their moment when they are still in the minority -- they have no such fear when they're the majority. There's another phrase for this situation: Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Well meaning immigrants who just wanted to integrate and assimilate into white societies, do so because it is a fait accompli that they cannot get a better deal. However, when it's obvious that this difficult and slow progress could be substituted by simply seizing the money of a conquered and enslaved producer class, their eyes brighten up and they discard their old morality for the new and better one. Sure, they were fine with the old way, but nothing could convince them to stick to it, when the new prospect opens up to them. As a majority with total power, things start to look very different from the past. Why should I have to be the garbage man and live in the small house? Why should I have to learn their language? Why should I have to practice their religion or respect their beliefs? I'm the one in power here, this is now my country, why doesn't it adapt to me? Why don't whites assimilate to us, the majority?

Therefore, many things change when the scales tip and non-whites gain control of a territory or a white government. Not only the relative power of the two tribes, and their access to the wealth of the country, but the attitudes of the two tribes as well change just as quickly. Previously neighborly, friendly minorities become power hungry, corrupt, atavistic and vicious. Previously tolerant, de-racinated and charitable whites wise up and become stingy, fearful, and extremely race-conscious. A microcosm of this could be seen in the hurricane katrina disaster, where the superdome included bands of whites manning barricades of thrown up junk and protecting the women inside with the men keeping watch night and day surrounded by surly and hateful seas of blacks intent on their murder the moment they thought they could get away with it. Just previous to this hurricane, the same whites were tourists, more or less safe and enjoying themselves, and the blacks were simple townsfolk, going about their work. The attitudes of a race's members change drastically based on the authority structure, on the government that arbitrates between the groups -- it is not a safe thing to rely on, it is not a constant.

Of course, this is not to say that the presence of even one black isn't harmful to whites -- it is. The point is the additive cost of each malthusian place holder mouth to feed (that negates the extra white mouth that could have lived there instead) is minor compared to the threshold cost of losing control of one's territory or government. A great nation can abide a great deal of ruin. In fact, we can even take a little pride in being so rich, so powerful, that even when we throw half of our money away to complete waste and patronize millions of parasitic minorities who have done nothing but hurt us, we end up being the superpower of the world. What a nation cannot abide is the endgame, that last decade where everything is overturned all at once, and suddenly we have nothing left and no future save extinction. South Africa was also once a majority white country. South Africa also took pride in all the good it was doing for the blacks, despite their stupidity and inability to contribute to the greater good. There's no reason why anyone else has to make the same mistake twice. The experiment has already been performed, the results are already in -- we cannot allow such a thing to happen anywhere else.

Unfortunately for Americans, one race is such a good chameleon, that it took power without our even noticing. These white on the outside, non-white in the inside jews already control our government and have since Roosevelt's time. Currently, half the rich people in America are jews. They control the government through a shadowy matrix of campaign contributions, policy think tanks, media editorials, social science proffessors, lobbyists, voters, etc. They account for half of the US's billionaires. They have special protected statuses that denotes the nobility of all time periods -- a commoner cannot insult an aristocrat, but an aristocrat is free to insult a commoner. Political Correctness is just a new term for the same old pecking order. When you look at who is the least insultable in the United States, the answer is obvious to everyone -- jews. The Holocaust memorial was built in our capital before we ever had a memorial to our own troops who died in WWII. What could be a more obvious feature of an occupied government? America had nothing to do with the Holocaust, nor are any of the american jews here victims of the holocaust. We lost 300,000 white American lives in WWII, and yet the first thing we do is build a memorial to European jews who died during the war. How does that make any sense from a white perspective? But of course, if America is a jewish country, it makes perfect sense to mourn the only dead that matter, other jews. Now our schools go about teaching every 5 year old and up the horrors of the holocaust, an event American whites did not participate in, nor were victims of. Why? From our perspective, we should either be taught about the people who victimized us, or whom we victimized, as those are the only subjects relevant to our nation's future behavior.

At the very least, we should be taught of foreign atrocities by their order of magnitude. Therefore before learning of the Holocaust on any 'objective merit,' we should first have covered the reign of Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Genghis Khan, the Aztecs, the Thirty Years War, the Muslim conquests of India, and Imperial Japan's slaughters starting from 1930 up until the day we stopped them. All of these atrocities were larger than the Holocaust on the scale of numbers and suffering, so why not teach our five year olds about them? The answer is obvious, it was never about the objective evil of the Holocaust that we must ward our children against, it was always about the subjective suffering of the Chosen people, the ones who run our government and call the shots. They were most interested in memorializing their dead and making our children worship and pity them in every way possible, to ensure their eternal power and control over us, than cataloging anything to do with white history, or an objective tally of world history's crimes. There could not be any better evidence of who exactly controls America than what is taught to our kids as being of relevance and importance from the past. As George Orwell said: He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future. Dethrone the jews, and the next thing we can do is tear down all their Holocaust museums, just like the hateful statues of Saddam Hussein the Iraqis got to tear down. They are a symbol of our conquest and the tyranny of the jewish dictatorship whose sole goal has been our enslavement and destruction. Then we can erase the entire Holocaust literature from our schools, and never let our children hear a damn word about it, except in passing or as some irrelevant footnote to true white concerns. What a liberating feeling that will be! In place of the DC Holocaust Museum, we could build a museum to white victims of world jewry. It could start with Egypt and Babylon and just move all the way up to the present day, with the passage of the 1965 Immigration act, all the victims of black crime since the civil rights act could be written on a black marble wall next to our Vietnam wall, ah the joy in sending all our children on pilgramages to DC to get an education about evil jews who persecuted and murdered us for decades, centuries, even millenia. The mirror opposite of the narrative told today!

Because of jews, we were forced into WWI and WWII -- despite popular sentiment both times being completely against going to war. The first time, jews used their media, financial, and political ties to convince Wilson and the US populace to send us to war to support jewish interests -- namely Britain's Balfour declaration and the defeat of the Ottoman Empire and freeing up of Palestine for jewish settlement. They trumped up complete lies about Germany to stir up sympathy for war -- the staged Lusitania disaster, the lying zimmerman telegram claiming Germany had plans to invade America through Mexico, etc. The second world war was the same. Hitler tried to avoid war with the United States at all cost, even though the jewish-influenced (his top counselor for instance was Morgenthau) Roosevelt was pushing for war through any means possible, even ordering the US navy to fire on any and all German ships they encountered. Even so, most people were against the war until Pearl Harbor, another artificially provoked event we could've avoided if not for our aggressive foreign policy against Japan.

Jews lobbied for and led the 1965 immigration act through congress. The final bill was the Hart-Cellar act, one of whom was a jew. If not for them, there would be no hispanics in this country -- now they have overtaken two of our states and eventually will take over the whole country. Everywhere they inhabit ruin follows, because they are biologically inferior and culturally completely alien -- something that suits jews just fine, who love the policy of divide and conquer and thrive on the new votes that support their spidery hold on the majority populace.

Jews were half the 'freedom riders' who went south to end segregation in all the marches with the communist fraud MLK. It was a jewish speech writer who coached everything MLK said in public, including his I have a Dream speech. Jews founded and ran the NAACP, blacks were just a figurehead for the movement. All the crime that has followed, all the bussing of white school children to minority districts where they are bullied, abused, and cannot be taught anything in failed public schools, is the fault of jews.

Jews have run the federal reserve for decades, they completely control the monetary policy of the United States. Aside from the inflationary pressure this has placed on our economy as a standard course, the egregious current waste of trillions in stimulus and bailouts is all going from jews, to jews, in an incestuous relationship between banks and government -- private jews and public jews -- or in other words crony capitalism. They've stolen more money from white taxpayers in a few months than the combined cost of black crime in the last fifty years. Just wrap your heads around that. It's hard to fathom, isn't it?

My point is this: The true harm caused by minorities is not their malthusian base resource cost, their placeholder cost that denies that space and wealth going to a new white child. If that were so, jews would be the least harmful minority in America, a tiny, innocuous, and harmless handful of enrichers. Instead they are the most harmful minority in America, the source of all our other woes, the misfortune of the world; and it's all because they have already achieved the dream that blacks and hispanics and muslims currently only dream of -- control of our territory and government. If whites had control of our own territory and government, we could swiftly and efficiently deal with the woes all our other minorities cause. They would be utterly harmless, we could even afford to keep every one of them in our country and bloodsucking away at our flanks, due to our sheer size and majesty. Whites are hurt more by jews than all the other races combined -- and we always have been. More whites were killed by the bolshevik jews than all the blacks, Indians, and muslims combined ever managed. It's horrifying what they did to Russia. It can never be forgiven. Never.

Eventually, someday, hispanics, blacks, muslims, or asians could present a threat as grave to whites as jews ALREADY CONSTITUTE. IE, those races might someday be numerous and influential enough to seize our government and territory. Even South Africa did not manage to do this without the help of jews -- the founders and behind the scenes runners of the ANC. But Haiti, at least, does represent a pure transition of white to black rule. As such, we must of course guard against the dangers of muslim/black/hispanic/asian takeover. We cannot allow them to control our government (heck, it would be better if they had no say in it at all), or populate a territory so heavily that they become the government of that region, and exploit its economic worth for themselves. California is a basket case due to just this sort of transition. But it's all rather elementary, when we've already lost control of our government and territory to jews. It's like closing the barn door after the horse has already bolted. Let's admit it, we haven't had a white America for practically a century; everything has been designed for the benefit of the jews, nothing for our own benefit. Henry Ford was pointing this out 80 years ago, it was already so virulent even then! It's hardly improved since, in fact, their hold has only become more permanent, more established, more unchallengeable, more unquestionable, with each passing year. If we want to free America and regain our sovereignty and territory, it can only be freed, and retrieved, from its current owners. It's kind of hard to ward against alien invasion when it's already occurred. The british may as well marshal their arms today and range out on the beaches to stop the normans from crossing the channel. First we must throw out our current alien invader overlords, our current usurpers and tyrants, before we have any chance at warding off future aliens, invaders, overlords and tyrants. Barack Obama is entirely the product of our jewish minders, just like the NAACP, the entire presidency is a figurehead, a front, with jewish power underneath. There's no possibility this is wrong, the jews even admit to it --

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1037029.html

Once jews are thrown out of government, they would become as harmless as any other minority -- a nuisance, but nothing more. In fact, due to their small numbers, they would become the most harmless group in America. We could be as benevolent and merciful to them as we wished, with no threat to our own safety. After all, once we recognize the jews for who they are and take steps to ensure our government belongs exclusively to ourselves from here on, what can they do? Their entire power lay in their chameleon like nature, their white skins that hid as members of the majority while always siding with other minorities. Naming the jew is the same as robbing it of its magic powers. Like cockroaches they cannot stand the light of day. If we want to save America without hurting anyone, it's still possible. Dethrone the jew, undo all the anti-white policies that jews implemented that make us vulnerable to subsequent infections (in the classic AIDS-TB process), and watch your children play in the rolling green fields of our beautiful 50 states. The one thing you cannot achieve, is saving America without ever confronting the jews. That would be as hilarious as launching a revolution without unseating the current government or disobeying any of its orders. The status quo is jewish rule, jews want the status quo to continue, this is the ideal world jews have crafted for themselves. To change the status quo, to remake the world, to put in new rulers, the interests you'll always conflict with, the people always barring your way, will be said jews. How can it be otherwise? It would be like Jupiter trying to become ruler of the gods, without ever confronting his father Chronos, who attempted to eat him and all his siblings to keep him down! Or Luke trying to become a jedi, without ever facing Darth Vader. It's not possible, it's not going to happen. We are doomed to this confrontation, by the nature of reality. Politeness, good wishes, or squeamish fear, cannot stop the inevitable. The war is, and always has been, for the last two thousand years, with the jews, the only minority that has ever threatened the west. No one else has mattered, and no one else matters now. It's the jews, stupid!

The jews are our misfortune! The rest is just details.

p.s. : Be sure to listen to this youtube Saga song, really, it's great and with 1300 comments, it's wonderful to know how many people have rallied to the cause. We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. Look how many people signed off with 14 in their comments! It's heart warming.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKDe-09EpNM&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcofcc.org%2F%3Fp%3D5715&feature=player_embedded

p.p.s: I'm going on vacation for a couple weeks. I'm not giving up. The fire burns bright and true. So don't worry just cuz I'm not posting~

Obama's Insane Policies:

Politics isn't a very interesting topic, because so little ever happens in politics, and yet so much is written about it in a day to day manner. There's not a dime's worth of difference between the two parties, and therefore arguing against one or for the other is a complete waste of time. Philosophy is much more interesting, and I prefer to stick to larger ideas without mentioning politicians or the current debates going on in the media. Quite simply, everything the media says is controlled by the enemy, and therefore no topic worth mentioning ever occurs in that arena. If the media is even discussing an issue, you can be sure it is essentially irrelevant and meaningless -- attention will never be given to the issues that matter.

However, even I am taken aback by Obama's agenda for America. It's rare for a politician to attempt to destroy America in so many ways, so quickly, that the bills start colliding and interfering with each other. Any one of these bills, if they pass, will cripple our economy. Assuming they all pass together, I have no idea how we the people would cope. The economy is already approaching the same levels as the Great Depression from the 1930's. Any other president would be intent on saving our economy, strengthening our capitalist underpinnings, restoring the dollar and getting Americans jobs. Not Obama, he doesn't give a damn that we are currently in a Great Depression. Instead, he's determined to push hyper-marxist laws that America has rejected over and over again, and still disapproves of in every poll, that will only compound our problems and extend our misery for decades to come. That is, if we ever recover. It's rare that even a single bill or idea this disastrous is pushed in Congress, but Obama has at least five on the table he's pushing simultaneously! George W. Bush has to have been our worst president of all time -- but at this rate, it won't take long for Obama to surpass him.

First, Obama has done nothing about George Bush's wars. We are spending as much or more on these fruitless, evil wars as we were before Obama got elected. This is all the more angering because while Obama was campaigning, this is the one thing he was ever right about -- the one advantage we would gain by electing Obama over McCain. In fact, it appears Obama intends to increase the military's budget. It's still an even guess whether he intends to go to war with Iran. If we did, the price of oil would again shoot up, our military budget would devour yet more tax dollars, more young men would die for no reason, and America would become more vulnerable, not less, to terrorist reprisals.

Second, Obama has called for the strengthening of the community re-investment act, rather than its dismantling. The entire real estate bubble was caused by loans given to 4 states: Nevada, Arizona, Florida, and California. It is almost exclusively due to hispanics taking loans they couldn't repay, and banks having to swallow the losses thereby incurred. America has lost trillions of dollars due to the reckless spending habits of minorities who couldn't possibly qualify under fair terms for their housing loans. What does Obama plan to do about this? Stop the bleeding? Stop making loans to minorities? Put in stricter standards to make sure anyone who takes out a loan for a house, can actually afford to repay the loan? NO, of course not. He plans to pump yet more money into minority neighborhoods, give even more free houses away, and let banks stomach yet more losses in an ever expanding cycle. There is no way we can possibly recover from this housing depression until we stop repeating the same mistakes that got us here in the first place. Can someone please tell Obama the statistics on the racial breakdown of mortgage defaults in this country? Apparently he hasn't caught the memo.

Obama's health care plan is another vile concoction. There is only one way to give everyone in America decent health care -- restrict it to cases unrelated to old age or bad behavior. If we were to do that, we could slash health costs to a bare minimum and cover every American out of the public purse. However, resorting to the taxpayer to accomplish the impossible has an unlimited financial cost. We cannot give all old people all the health care they need until they are 'healthy' again, because there is no god damned cure for old age. We cannot make people who smoke, overeat, drink, sleep around and take drugs as healthy as people who diet and exercise while refraining from sin. People who poison themselves have no right to be supported by anyone else! The cost of irresponsibility, if transferred to others, allows it to expand indefinitely. It is a moral hazard on the grandest scale. This health care bill simply shanghais healthy people to subsidize sick people at no gain to themselves. The current estimate for this new boondoggle is a trillion dollars, but of course that's just the beginning. What about illegal aliens who will flood in for the now free health care benefits? What about people living less healthily since they now don't have to pay for the consequences? What about the automatic ballooning nature of government that oversaw the same growth in Social Security and Medicare we were told would never happen when they were implemented?

Now let's look at 'Cap and Trade.' In short, Obama wants us to return to the pre-industrial age. That's all well and good, but does he intend to return to the population levels of that period as well? Something like 1% of all energy generated in America comes from solar and wind. There is no way it could possibly fuel a modern economy or provide for the needs of 300 million Americans. Either we continue to use coal, oil, and natural gas, or we starve to death, freeze to death, and otherwise die until our population is back to the USA of 1700 or so. Most notably, none of Obama's energy plans include new nuclear plants. If we ever did want to get rid of fossil fuels, the simple solution would be to switch to nuclear power. But that isn't Obama's goal. Obama's goal is to eliminate all sources of energy, to simply turn out the lights on America.

Here is a quote: http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/19/obama-lets-eat-less-so-that-we-can-lead-by-example-on-climate-change-by-eating-less/ “We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times … and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK,” Obama said.

“That’s not leadership. That’s not going to happen,” he added.

Obama literally wants us to starve to death -- that's his energy plan. "We can no longer eat as much as we want." What a far cry this is from the original Marxism, that promised: "Peace, Land, and Bread!" Now we are offered hunger, freezing temperatures, and the end of the automobile as our bright new dawn under our Red-Green overlords.

Cap and Trade is currently another trillion dollar useless program that will not in any way prevent global warming or stop carbon dioxide emissions from entering the atmosphere. There will be zero, zero, ZERO impact on the Earth's temperature from this bill passing. The only people who benefit are corrupt insiders who stand to gain from the new arcane system of 'carbon credits,' and the government tax dollars they'll find ways to spend on completely different agendas. Even scientists agree that nothing we do will have the slightest impact on global warming, because it is all too little too late. We are locked in to a gradual warming of the earth due to heightened carbon emissions for the next century at least. If we want to cure our climate woes, all we can do is invest in technological solutions, such as fusion power, cheap solar power, atmospheric carbon retrieval programs or giant lampshades to cover the earth. Crippling our economy, removing our very ability to live and work in a technological, energy-intensive age, will only ensure our helplessness at facing these issues.

Of course this isn't nearly enough for Obama. Obama also wants to pass an amnesty for all the illegals in America. The moment an amnesty is passed, 20 million more poor, stupid people will be eligible for all sorts of government benefits. Welfare, health care, education, social security, you name it, they'll get it. Immigrants are net tax consumers, not producers. This is why California has gone bankrupt. It isn't rocket science to realize what a plague these hispanics are upon the land. Even so, Obama wants to give them all citizenship, encourage yet more hispanics to come, and lavish all of them with tons of new benefits courtesy of American tax payers. The cost of illegals and their broods of children, and grandchildren, and great-grandchildren, will continue to be paid by Americans for all time. Once amnestied, there will be no way to deport these invaders save civil war. The results will be higher crime and lower standards of living for the remainder of American history. There is no economic sense behind amnestying these illiterate high school dropout non-english speaking drug dealing gang banging schweinhunds.

The reason is not economic, it's pure hatred. Obama wants to genocide the native white inhabitants of America and replace them with more 'people of color' like himself. He hates us and wants us dead and gone, swept away by a wave of fellow thugs and idiots like his own race. He can identify with them, he can't with us, and therefore we must go and they must stay. In a time of great depression, where real unemployment is already 16%, allowing a massive influx of new immigrant workers into the country is pure insanity. How are people supposed to get jobs when there is a glut of labor in the market? How are the poor supposed to get a living wage when there is an infinite supply of scab workers ready and willing to invade America and work for less? How dare Obama pass an amnesty of illegal workers on us during a time of record unemployment? How dare a single immigrant be allowed into this country while our own people cannot find jobs and are living in tents as we speak? It makes me want to cry. We don't have to read the Grapes of Wrath to feel compassion for the poor anymore -- the stories are all around us, here and now. Only pure hatred could animate Obama's push for amnesty in the midst of this pain.

That's not all, folks! There's more! In 2010, just a year from now, George W. Bush's tax cuts are slated to 'phase out.' At the time, they represented welcome relief and spurred our economy to steady growth even in a time of war and terrorist attacks. However, as the years went by, 'tax freedom day' continued to revert to where it had been before the Bush tax cuts had been passed. This is because state and local governments, seeing that people had less federal taxes, simply increased their own taxes to make up the difference. Now, if all the Bush tax cuts were phased out to nothing like they are slated to, it would represent a gigantic tax INCREASE on all Americans. It would not be reverting to the tax burden of 2001, it would be reverting to a tax burden never before seen in American history. It's common knowledge that increasing taxes hurts the economy, whereas cutting taxes always helps the economy. Sometimes it makes sense to hurt the economy for the sake of some greater good. If for instance, we can afford to hurt the economy, because it's roaring along swimmingly anyway, and we'd like to partake in some form of social justice, cold war, or space race -- then fine increase taxes. In the midst of a Great Depression however, where the only thing we can possibly be focused on is getting the economy back on its feet, a tax hike is suicide. The bush tax cuts saved us trillions -- the corresponding restoration will be a tax hike of trillions, all in a time where no one can afford their current bills. Taxes depress business activity because it is harder to make profits, and thus less worthwhile to make any investments. Fewer people will be hired, and the depression will drag on indefinitely, while the government wastes all the money it stole from us on worthless boondoggles like wars in the middle east, cap and trade, or universal unlimited health care -- that no one wants and nobody can afford.

Under Obama, our economy is doomed. If a new congress isn't elected in 2010 that can stop all these horrendous bills from passing, irreparable harm will afflict America for generations to come. Obama hasn't done a single thing right since his presidency began. I hate his foreign policy. I hate his domestic policy. I hate his stimulus package. I hate his automobile takeovers. I hate his trillion dollar deficit spending. I hate his pledge to donate billions to foreign aid at a time when Americans are suffering in our very midst. I hate that he won't reveal his birth certificate and verify he's even a natural born American citizen. I hate his appointment of Sotomayor, a sexist racist intellectual lightweight who doesn't deserve to shine Frank Ricci's shoes. I hate his hate speech laws that are yet another attempt to stifle the 1st Amendment's right to free speech in this last and only free country on earth. I hate his appointment of a black attorney general who says we are 'cowards' for not discussing race. I hate his appointment of a black head of NASA, some monkey man running the most technological and sophisticated science industry in the world. I hate his wife who has 'never been proud of America.' I hate that he won't salute the American flag when the star spangled banner is playing. I hate his race-traitor coal slumming whore of a mother. I hate his alcoholic marxist kenyan father. I hate his muslim stepfather. I hate his Trinity Church 'mentor', Reverand Wright, who preached "God Damn America!" and said whites are responsible for the AIDS virus spreading like wildfire among a black community too fucking ape-like to keep their genitals to themselves. I hate that his political career was launched by a Marxist terrorist, Ayers, who has murdered Americans and committed treason in the hopes of ushering in a new Bolshevik age of terror into the land of the free. I hate that his primary campaign contributor was Goldman Sachs, a jewish fraud institute that rakes in billions through non-transparent means while all the other banks around them go under. I hate this man, this president, who has done more harm to America in the last six months than Bush did in the last six years.

I hope all his bills pass. I hope he's re-elected. I hope in his next term, he comes up with 10 new amazing bills just as bad as these, and they all pass too. I hope Obama gets a third and a fourth term, hell, I hope Obama revokes the entire constitution and becomes dictator for life. Anything to wake up the idiot masses of America! Anything to break free of this horrible fantasy of a post-racial, multicultural, rainbow love society. Anything, any amount of suffering, if this can at least be the bottom of the well, the limit to our tolerance, and the beginning of the resistance that must form, sooner or later, if the white race is to survive in our own country our ancestors fought and died for. Roll on, Obama! Roll on, Communism! Roll on, the new dark age!

Once the last vestige of civilization is gone, there will finally be nothing left to stop us. Whites don't lose wars to monkeys.

Racism's Prerequisites:

Racism is an ideology, a belief system, one reaches only at the end of a very long journey. Antisemitism is the same. The only way to reach these conclusions is through a long and winding intellectual journey that first discovers many other, more essential and primordial truths. Only once people have accepted all the previous realizations, can they ever move on to the more complicated belief in racism.

Racism is not a popular ideology, not because of WWII, or how our message is presented, or the personal failings of racists, or any other simplistic explanation. The real reason racism is unpopular is because it rests upon a bed of logical assumptions that most of humanity has not yet accepted. People are rejecting the foundations of racism, which then leaves racism to seemingly float in midair with zero support from any principled foundation. It's pretty easy to reject racism, once you've completely undermined the very reasons to be a racist in the first place. If people poke a hole, break a pillar of support, in any one of the underlying assumptions, it is then safe to reject racism, sexism, antisemitism, etc on the basis that one of its pillars is unsound.

Of course, none of racism's pillars are unsound -- but humanity would like to believe they are. This is because it would be more comforting if they were false. Or, the subject matter is too complicated for their tiny pea brains and they prefer a more 'common sense' theory. If evolution doesn't make sense to them, if they can't imagine how a whale can be related to a dog, then they'll just throw out the entire theory, rather than admit they're simply too stupid to understand. These are the actual problems facing racism: Moral cowards and intellectual lightweights. The moral cowards see quite clearly that the pillars of racism are true, but can't accept it and retreat into doublethink and spiritual self-censorship, to avoid the conclusions staring them in the face. Intellectual lightweights seize upon extraneous superficialities and become so fixated on their own narrow horizons of thought, they can't imagine a world as complicated as our own. It is more likely we will discover the fundamental laws of motion, before we discover the laws of human behavior and decode why people do what they do. Therefore, humanity is the most complicated subject in nature -- it's obvious stupid people will be unable to understand the points made about human nature, by those with higher IQ. It will fly over their heads just like quarks and quasars do.

I suppose there is a third group that makes racism impossible, and that is people who understand full well the underlying truths that lead to racism, and thus are extremely racist themselves, but nevertheless combat racism and antisemitism out of pure self interest. These people follow Lenin's creed of "Who? Whom?" They are certainly ruthless enough to face the truth and smart enough to realize the truth, they are simply too hypocritical to actually publish or defend the truth. Luckily, I believe this crowd is in the minority and that furthermore, their power and influence would be completely swamped if the cowards and idiots were dealt with. Though certainly the most dangerous and respectable adversary on a per capita basis, they are in a sense a footnote to the true conflict, which is the great morass of humanity still stuck in the stone age.

Here I will try and explain what the pillars of racism are, and why they are all essential to being a racist anti-semite, and why they are true. Honestly, racism is just the capstone of a philosophical pyramid, it's the least interesting and important step in the theory, simply a logical conclusion following from our pre-existing principles. Once you realize all the pillars of creation, the conclusions are as simple as adding 2+2 to reach 4. There is no major leap between these truths, and the socially ostracized conclusions -- the part about being a racist is a mere consequence of one's thinking, not the basis or cause. Which is why ascribing evil motives or emotions for the basis of racism is so comical. Racism is a conclusion, it is caused by the rest of true philosophy, it is the cause of nothing. There is no motive behind being a racist antisemite save one, the wish to follow the light of truth and avoid the pitfalls of cowardice, stupidity or hypocrisy.

Pillar #1: Atheism.

Atheism is essential to racism, for many reasons. Since atheism is even less popular than racism, it's interesting to see how selective racism is. To be a racist, much is required of your intellect and courage, it's not something people can accept lightly. Why can't people believe in a God, a creation myth, an afterlife, divine justice, etc and be racist? Where is the contradiction?

Let me count the ways! Suppose there is a creation myth. This means God created the world the way it is today, and approves of it. This is the best of all possible worlds. In that case we should fatalistically accept whatever God hands us. If the world looks inscrutably bad to us, and we wish it were different, we can just console ourselves that God works in mysterious ways, and let alone. Only by rejecting a creation myth, can people realize that we are where we are today through spontaneous chance, that there is nothing innately good about the status quo, that there is nothing protecting us from a sudden downturn in our fortune, nor is there anything stopping us from creating a much better utopia out of the materials we have at hand. With a creation myth, evolution can't exist. Without a creation myth, we can understand evolution, and thus understand the power of genetics and harness this to our will. Without evolution, life, and humanity, makes no sense. At this point stupid people insert some logical fallacy like 'God did it.' Not realizing that a) God is even more inscrutable than evolution. b) Occam's razor rules out including unnecessary components like a separate universe, supernatural forces, a Maker, etc when evolution can explain it all within the known observable universe. c) Who made God?

Perhaps the creation myth isn't the worst part about God, however. The afterlife is probably much worse. If there is an afterlife, it follows logically that everything you do in this life is of minimal importance. Instead of maximizing the welfare and good fortune of your fellow man, instead of trying to make a contribution to the future of mankind, there is a sudden priority override. Since a single person's life, if immortal, will feel and do more than the entire accumulated lifespan of everyone who will ever live in this universe, one immortal soul's fate is more important than the entire fate of the universe. With such a ridiculous and yet logical position, people will do one of two things -- seek personal salvation at the cost of all worldly interests, or seek the salvation of others at the cost of all worldly interests. Either way, the entire brain is fried, the programming becomes utterly senseless to the interests of life, humanity, or basic material reality. There is no current religion whose ticket to the afterlife is to maximize the worldly interests of the people of this universe. If so, it might be possible through sheer coincidence to be religious and still materialist and utilitarian. Instead the religions demand things in complete contradiction to our worldly needs. In Buddhism, people are supposed to stop caring about the world, meditate, and offer pacifism in the face of aggression. Instead of improving the material lot of man, they spend endless time trying to improve their spirits, which don't even exist -- but that doesn't stop them. India was mired in complete stagnation due to their beliefs and was the punching bag of any army that marauded through. Even today, India is the concentration of the greatest poverty and woe in the world outside of Africa. Westernizing influence for hundreds of years finds it very tough work to improve society in the face of a religion who has no interest in their own damn lives. And yes, Hinduism is different from Buddhism, but how different, really? Instead of caring about the world, you are supposed to simply accept it as the result of one's karma. If you believe in a divine justice ruling the world, you by default have no interest in imposing a personal justice on the world in defiance of God. You are born into your caste, and your only goal is to abide by the rules of your religion, in the hopes of being reincarnated into a different caste -- or the more ominous 'escaping the cycle of rebirth' which just means the ultimate goal of Hinduism is death. Whee.

For Islam, the best possible route to salvation is through martyrdom in the course of Jihad. Muhammed praises over and over again how dying in battle against the infidels is more favored by Allah than 40 years of fasting and praying. There is basically no sure ticket to paradise save through violent jihad, and the rewards of martyrs are much greater than non-martyrs anyway. Wherever the religion does hold sway, people are not allowed to pursue their worldly interests. Instead they are stuck in stagnation, endlessly repeating prayers five times a day, rejecting all science as contra-Islam, refusing to change any law code because it was established by God, even if one's material conditions are far different than the one's found in 600 AD Arabia. Islam does not promote worldly good, but since paradise is eternal, as is hell, the fate of one single soul's salvation or damnation is worth the slaughter of billions here on earth. After all, lifespans on earth are mere candlelight flickers in the face of immortality. Add up the lifespan of every infidel who lives today, or who will ever live, and then kill them all -- if it means Allah favors a single jihadi for his service, then overall a great good has occurred. All life combined is a mere candle flicker to immortality.

Christianity has the same problem. There's no point to this life. Jesus himself counsels people to disregard their worldly interests and look to the afterlife. "What use is there in laying up treasures on earth? People should seek to lay up treasure in heaven." A good Christian, one can derive from the teachings of the bible, is a missionary, an ascetic, a childless virgin, a meek, foolish, poor person, a pacifist who turns the other cheek when abused, and so on and so forth. There couldn't be a more suicidal religion designed if we tried. While Islam excels at promoting murder, Christianity excels at suicide. God actually favors virgins and the childless: As Paul wrote -- "It would be preferable if everyone stayed a virgin and single like me, but if they find that too difficult, it is (he grudgingly supposes) better to marry than to burn." What the hell is that? As though loving sex in the interest of perpetuating the species were immoral, illegitimate, or somehow disfavored in the eyes of God. I don't know of any religion save Christianity that promotes such an evil, diseased belief.

The endless charity and missionary services sent to Africa, the endless foreign aid from western countries that are already deep in debt and can't take care of their own people, is all due to Christianity. Without this poisonous belief that sacrificing our worldly interests will help us reach heaven and avoid hell, all of our senseless actions would disappear. The same for our ridiculous mercy given to criminals, and Amy Biehl's parents hugging and forgiving their daughters' murderers. It's all due to the poisonous teachings of Christianity, it's all for the sake of salvation, it makes no sense whatsoever from the perspective of this life.

In short, any belief in an afterlife haywires and short circuits the normal logic of good and bad, right and wrong, beneficial and harmful. Anyone who believes that reaching the afterlife trumps all other values, cannot be a racist. Because all material interests, including the betterment of one's race, are as dust and dross to the religious. Anyone who believes in God and the afterlife, has no time for such petty and meaningless concerns, and will sacrifice them in an eye blink for their personal salvation. Such people can't be trusted to be racist, and can never truly be racist, no matter what they say. When the rubber hits the road, they know where their bread is buttered -- and it isn't anywhere in this world.

Furthermore, as almost every religion believes that God is currently dispensing justice onto this world, and is somehow overlooking and guiding the fate of mankind, it would be heresy to rebel against the status quo or seek to change anything. Religion introduces a force of inertia into all our dealings. If someone proposes eliminating gays or retards or criminals, we can always bet the religious will pipe up saying that these people are 'natural' and 'God-given' and that God would disapprove of trying to remake the world. They constantly talk about all the harm atheists cause by pursuing a material utopia as opposed to an utopian afterlife. Of course, they never mention how much harm they do to material utopians by pursuing an utopian afterlife at our expense. The fact that we are forced to live cheek by jowl with subhumans, thugs, braindead animals, degenerates and parasites all due to their divine plan is swept under the rug. Any belief in a divine plan, karma, or a secret justice underlying the dealings of our world discredits any attempt to change or remake the planet along racial lines. Or along any materialist, utilitarian lines. As far as they're concerned, God will work everything out for us, we should therefore do nothing and just go with the flow. In such barren soil, the extremism necessary for real change is incapable of growth.

Apart or separately, belief in God and religion completely eviscerates racism. Phony patchwork methods of trying to link racism to various biblical verses (which can be interpreted any way one pleases) did not save the Confederacy, and it will not save us. Confederates had all sorts of biblical pretexts for enslaving blacks, but no one bought it. Why? Because God would not have created blacks if he did not love them and wish them well, if he did not have some plan for them. The moment blacks were classified as having souls, the end was nigh. A single black person's salvation was more important than the worldly interest of the entire Confederacy. Even if slavery was necessary to the economy, even if getting rid of slavery would lead to high crime, interbreeding, and the rape of southern women -- what is any of that to the salvation of a single black soul? Since slavery was seen as imperiling to the souls of the slaves and slavers alike, all material concerns were considered -- correctly if there really is an afterlife -- to be utter irrelevancies.

The sooner racists abandon their religion the better. They are on illogical, non-solid ground. Simply desiring to have their cake and eat it too, they take on the logically contradictory belief that A) there is a God, an afterlife, a divine plan, and a creation myth and B) it's okay to upset all of these things for the sake of saving one's race. Sorry, buckos. If there is a God, your only allegiance can be to Him. Everything must be sacrificed to him, nothing is left for the race. Just give it up and go home to the nice cozy anti-racism all your fellow believers have already accepted. There is a reason religion is one of the leading promoters of anti-racism and racial suicide. It's because the logical conclusion of any religious person is the death of the white race. There is no avoiding it. Silly nonsense verses patched together from here and there, cannot offset the ultimate logic underlying the nature of God and the defined routes to heaven. If people aren't even supposed to preserve their own lives or have children, there can be no divine sanction for preserving the race. There is no value whatsoever in perpetuating life on this planet. According to Christianity, it would be better if everyone stopped having children and we could just get on with the afterlife portion of God's plan. According to Islam, unless you're willing to accept incredible hardship and tedium and obey all of Allah's wishes for the rest of time, and doom the planet to complete stagnation (until the sun explodes and we all die), you're a marked man and eventually Allah will send his minions to chop off your head. Either way you're fucked. All religions are anti-thetical to life, and thus to any attempt at preserving life, including the life of your race.

Pillar #2: Utilitarianism

Now that everyone left is a materialist, we must ask ourselves, what will we value in this material world? What will we define as Good or Bad? It's completely up to us, and depending on the choices we make, we can either get one step closer to racism, or eliminate any chance of reaching it. There are plenty of philosophies to choose from, all of them poisonous and destructive to humanity's future. There is only one philosophy that protects us and leads to a better world. This is utility -- measuring the goodness or badness of things, based on the overall impact they have on the happiness/well-being of life. Utilitarianism reaches radically different conclusions than any other belief system. In Utilitarianism, the ends justify the means. This is absolutely necessary if we are going to be racists. There is no other way. Being a racist, sexist, anti-semite, inevitably ends in harming someone, however little, and making someone somewhere worse off than they currently are under the present system. No matter how much we sugar the pill, until we accept that the ends justify the means, there will be no way to 'morally' move forward. All other moral systems thus fail.

For instance, as much as I love Kant, his categorical imperative "to treat people as end's in themselves," is hopelessly contradictory. If the well being of a single person is the end goal of existence, then everyone else's well being should be sacrificed for his sake. However, Kant says every single person's well being is the end goal of existence. Who, then, should be sacrificed to whom? It's impossible to promote everyone's well being at once. The moral system simply crashes, just like the golden rule. "Treat others as you would wish to be treated." But of course, I would wish to be treated like a God, or at least a King. I would want endless tribute, praise, wealth, and women to come free of charge. Therefore, how do I intend to treat everyone as well as I'd like to be treated? It's impossible to promote everyone's welfare to the ridiculous amount as to place it as the moral End of existence. Instead we must sacrifice all personal moral ends -- like objectivists who say individuals are the ends of existence -- and retreat to a more limited, sensible end that can encompass all people. A utilitarian's end is much more objective, it worries about the larger picture, and is thus able to stay self-consistent and actually implementable. A utilitarian says, treat these things of highest value, and do what you must so that the greatest amount of it exists in the 4 dimensional universe that is space and time. There are no contradictions, only road bumps. If something is good, but not as good as something else, we get rid of that good thing. If something is bad, but not as bad as something else, we implement the bad thing. We don't get hamstrung by stupid rules requiring we maximize good in reference to all possible subjects, we take the objective view that some people's lives will be made worse for the sake of others being made better.

We accept the very phrase of Kant: From the crooked timber of humanity, nothing ever did grow smooth.

What does this mean? It means that with the universe we were given, a universe that arrived through spontaneous chance and has no interest in our welfare, a universe where evil has as much survival value as good, a universe where natural forces proceed completely heedless of what life might wish for, we can not save everyone. We cannot help everyone. We can't treat everyone in the best possible way. We have to accept a crooked, non-smooth course that tries its best to minimize the suffering and maximize the happiness of our people, given the limitations nature has put upon us. Not following this path and mindlessly insisting that everyone be treated as sacrosanct and infinitely precious, just leads to contradictions and paradoxes, because that simply isn't the universe we live in. Wishing can't make it so.

There are numerous answers to what we should value in a materialist universe like our own.

Answer #1: The meaning of life is more and better life.
Answer #2: The meaning of life is to reach infinite power, complexity, intelligence, and resilience, the goal of all life forms as seen through the process of evolution on earth.
Answer #3: We are the eye through which the universe beholds itself and knows itself divine.
Answer #4: We are vessels of divinities much higher than ourselves, who by our existence, can express themselves through us: Truth, Beauty, and Love.

There are many other formulations, all right in their own way. For such a beautiful subject as what is good about the world, much can be said, much can be included, and it's rare to grasp the entire knot in a single statement. Suffice to say, Utility is aiming for truly splendid things. These ends really do justify the means. Reaching these ends really is meaningful and important. There is value without God giving us any. From an imperfect world, truly sacred and divine, perfect, moral absolutes can be reached -- given time and effort, we can accomplish anything.

The existence of objective moral absolutes is necessary for utilitarianism. Cultural and moral relativism, that posits no definite conclusion can be reached about what is good or bad, and thus we should just leave everything alone and go with the flow, is essentially the same problem as the religious people's 'divine plan.' Relativists, who are unsure of any value, cannot calculate whether blacks or whites are superior or inferior. They cannot calculate even whether bugs or humans are superior or inferior. Only moral absolutes with set laws and goals, can define who is superior or inferior. A superior person or object, is that which better furthers the ultimate goal of Utilitarianism -- whatever that goal might be. It is easy to understand, easy to see, and thus easy to decide. Once we know what we want, it's easy to see how best to go about getting it. The big step was deciding what we wanted, and deciding that the ends justify the means. Racism is a little step. Once we know we want the values listed above, it's obvious that the white race, and perhaps the east asians, are the people best able to achieve these ends. Then it becomes obvious that we should promote their interests over and above all other races on earth, for the sake of maximizing life's, mankind's, and Good's utility. Racism is usually defined as viewing one race as superior to another. But only utilitarianism arms people with an objective absolute that can measure races, or people, and decide who is superior and who is inferior. Without that code, we are left with a vague morass. Social contract theory? That says nothing about what the contract should be. Kantian golden rule formulas? That says everyone is to be equally valued regardless of their nature. Individualism? The same rule. Socratic formulas of ethics? But they only deal with personal virtues and avoid larger systems like the morality of societies and nations. All religions have already been discussed and dismissed. Relativism? But that simply says nothing is of value, since it's all in the eye of the beholder. There's no point to anything after that.

If you want to be a racist, you have to be a Materialist Utilitarian first. There is no other way. For all the weak of heart, who refuse to sanction hurting anyone or treating anyone as less than absolutely essential/pivotal/priceless, their journey ends here. Atheists who are not utilitarians, will end up in some morass of nihilism, relativism, Ayn Randian individual subjectivism, or simply incoherent wishes to see everyone happy and the beginning of the age of Aquarius. It's likely that somewhere in here they resort to the epicurean plan: 'eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die.' A utilitarian never dies --- we live in a four dimensional universe, and the actions we take today affect the entire rest of the future -- trillions of lives and billions of years to come, will all be shaped by what we do here and now. So long as we value those outcomes, it will be as important to us, how we affect the future long after we are dead, as it is to us how we've affected our loved ones today. We have no need to resort to despair or escapism, because we have a noble, higher calling, far better than drugs, drink, or sex. We have the fate of the universe in our hands. Our moral system is nothing less than remaking the world in our image, to become God and rule the world. Utilitarianism is the most hopeful, powerful, and aggrandizing belief possible. People are not helpless cogs in a system, like God's plan would have us be. We are actors on a giant stage with the highest stakes imaginable. We are the key to the world, the pivot, the fulcrum upon which destiny teeters. Though happiness may elude the Utilitarian, purpose and pride never does. Out of all the choices we can make in this crooked world, it's about the best we can hope for.

Pillar #3: Malthusianism

The third pillar of racism is belief in limited resources. The 'dismal science,' as Darwin's time period called it. Malthus reached a startling conclusion that had somehow eluded all previous eras: That life grew diametrically, and yet resource accumulation could only grow arithmetically. Therefore life had built into it the source of its own misery. No matter how efficient or powerful we become, we will not be able to satisfy everyone's desires completely. Even if people have only a 1% population growth rate, the law of exponents means this will translate into trillions and trillions of babies being born per second, deep in the future. There is no way to support this kind of population, not even with every star in the galaxy under our control. Ultimately, we will at some point have to decide on a stable, sustainable population. At that point, we will have to choose winners and losers. Who gets to live? Who do we not have space for? Who isn't 'spongeworthy' as Elayne would say? Every single person's existence on this planet, comes at the expense of someone else. They are taking up a space, devouring resources, that could have gone elsewhere. In a malthusian world, people have to justify their life, they can't just take it for granted.

We did not invent malthusianism, we discovered it. The nature of the universe is such, that there will always be limited resources, and that one person's gain is another's loss. Even having three children per family represents a massive 50% growth rate that is utterly unsustainable for even a short time on this earth. If we want some populations to rise, we must first make others fall. It isn't out of sadism or hatred that we wish others ill, it's because this is the way the world works, and when handed lemons, it's best to make lemonade. Life is a zero-sum game, those who recognize this, hardly made it that way. We just acknowledge it and follow the rules. Those who don't, perish along the wayside. Life is cruel, there is no room left for pussies.

In a world without malthusian limits, in a world of infinite resources, utilitarianism would not amount to much. We could simply give everyone everything, make some more trillions of people of all varied worths, and then give them everything as well. Since every additional person, no matter how mediocre, is better than nothing, we would have no ability to discriminate between people -- it's impossible to reach a 'bigger infinity' by promoting infinite good people over infinite average people. Infinity is simply infinity.

In a world of malthusian limits, stark choices present themselves. Every single baby on earth represents a unit: Such and such amount of energy, metals, water, trees, carbon dioxide, oxygen, phosphate, surface area, and so on must be devoted to this child. Those resources are now unavailable to any other prospective child, the opportunities of others are forever closed. Giving birth is an act of war with the entire world. It is a declaration that henceforth, you intend to double the devouring of resources for your own sake, and everyone else has to give way and give up their portion to make this so. The idea that people can generate the extra wealth that they then use to provide for the child is an illusion. Man cannot generate anything, we are incapable of creating new resources. All we can do is accumulate what was already there, and this in a world of entropy where every step we take only leads to less and less usable forms of energy. The more activity we do, the more quickly we break down the universe into a vast stellar void. There is no way to 'generate' wealth, or 'produce' resources. All we can do is devour and consume them. Life is like a gravity well. We begin at a great height, the accumulated energy of the sun, the supernovas that formed our elements that make up the earth, and the product of the big bang. We can only go down from here. We eat the sun in terms of fossil fuels, we eat the supernovas of the past in terms of nuclear power, and we eat the big bang every time we take a sip of h2o. Every time we eat something, we convert some of our potential life energy into kinetic (expressed) life energy, and descend further into the well. There is no way back up, our entire trajectory is downwards to oblivion. What we eat today, we can never get back tomorrow. Every resource used is gone forever.

People aren't really 'creating' wealth. What they are doing, is gathering it. By gathering up some oil, some water, some food, or some precious metals, we assume we somehow 'earned' it. However, it's impossible to earn that which you had no hand in making. All the person did is gather it. If he didn't gather it, it would've been available to someone else in the future. Nothing is gained from you, in particular, being the one who got it. That's just egoism. There is hardly any virtue in grabbing the Christmas turkey and devouring it whole before any other family member did. Saying how difficult it was to digest the whole thing, or how hard it was to cut the turkey, will not impress your family members. All they see is that you got the turkey and they didn't.

From this perspective, it's obvious that in order to maximize our resources, we must very carefully discriminate about who we give our resources, and who should fill these limited slots that life allows. We are living on borrowed time, with only so much money. Every purchase we make now simply depletes our bank account -- there is no way to replenish it -- the law of entropy does not allow such nonsense. Therefore, only the wisest and most deliberative of purchases should be made. With an eye towards scraping every last vestige out of every choice we make, we need to elongate and preserve as much good as we can out of the limited resources we have. Throwing away our entire bank account on a wild party or a new set of golf clubs is not reasonable. We have what we have, and it has to go the entire way, from life's beginning to life's end. It should be invested in that which yields the greatest glory, the greatest happiness, the greatest knowledge, the greatest power, the greatest security we can find. Immediately upon deciding that we are going to be frugal and careful with how we spend our limited resources, we must then decide who is the ideal life form to spend our resources on. Will it be ants? Bacteria? Bugs? Monkeys? Dogs? Blacks? Whites? Asians? Jews? Who will we trust with our bank account of limited goods? Who do we want to blow our wad on? We only get one chance, the money is never coming back. Who best deserves the future of mankind, who will get the most out of life, who can translate these limited goods into our highest values?

It's obvious to me who deserves our limited resources, who best achieves the valuable things about life, how to maximize our utility. The only race whose track record speaks for itself: the white race.

Look at what blacks do with our world. They turn it into fly-blown rape and murder carnivals, where no one thinks an intelligent thought in their lives, and no building even reaches a second story. Or look at what India has done with itself, or the Aztecs, or the australian aborigines. They are all pathetic, it goes from stagnant and insignificant, to outright vicious and negative. It would be better that life simply did not exist at all, than life be represented by the Aztecs. I swear, there is more suffering and evil in the world, than any good could possibly recompense, with them at the helm. Asians are a more tricky question. They were seemingly inept at reaching Truth, the ideals of abstract logic, math, and science completely passed them by. They weren't very loving either, romance was muted and pair bonding was weak, men did not feel heavily invested in their wives. The relationship between civilians and leaders was also unloving. People were treated disgracefully, often mutilated or enslaved, and they died in droves every time a famine came due to high taxes or warmongering luxurious court nobles. Asians did have a fine aesthetic sense and an eye to beauty. They are themselves noble and beautiful bodies and forms, which they can take pride in. If Asians could somehow be tinkered with and altered enough, it's possible they really would be a worthy investment in the future. They could be our best representative and the best inheritor of this limited resource universe that can only afford to support the best. What about jews? To me, the answer is obvious. A race that was founded on bloody conflict and has done nothing but prey on others their entire existence long, cannot be considered the epitome of mankind or the wave of the future. Despite all the achievements their intelligence can lay claim to, their morality suffers so acutely that it's hard to differentiate them from the Aztecs. How is it possible that this one single tribe has been kicked out of 50 different countries, all of whom at first welcomed them and wished them well? How is it possible that empires collapse wherever jews go, like a black plague? First it was the Roman Empire, then Poland, Russia, Germany, and now America. Who can have faith in a group of people who have destroyed everything they ever touched and laid to ruin every country they ever inhabited? Is Israel supposed to make me feel better? That is one of the most wretched countries on earth, full of violence and oppression, poor and backwards, and unlikely to even survive another century. Should humanity be one giant Israel? You've got to do better than that. Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, and China are far superior to that model. It's simply no contest. Intelligence isn't enough. If you don't have a soul, if you're a bloodsucking plague, it doesn't matter how intelligently you go about your life cycle. It doesn't matter if you're a sentient disease! The question is, is this a path to more truth, beauty, and love? For a race that still celebrates its slaughter of egyptians and babylonians as religious holidays every year, I'd say they're a group that is furthest from such ideals.

However, there is one group I have faith in. Perhaps not the whites of today, but definitely the whites of yesteryear. As Human Accomplishment (by charles murray) shows, practically every achievement ever made, has been made by whites. White greeks, white romans, white renaissance, white enlightenment, white industrial revolution, white scientific age, white age of discovery, white everything. No matter where you look, anything good on earth, is probably due to some white male who invented it or discovered it was true. That's not all, whites are uniquely beautiful in their physical form. Not only to other whites, but all mankind wishes they were pale, colorful in hair and eye, tall, and hormonally feminine/masculine as we are. We are the measuring stick of beauty. The blacks try to rape us, the arabs bought our women at twice the price for slaves, the Indians use skin bleaching treatments to look more like us, and so on.

Not only that, but whites are the basis for the romantic love that so enriches our lives. The idea of chivalry, of women's innate gentleness, wisdom and virtue, of monogamous marriage, and of romantic love and courtship, are virtually unique to whites. The warmth of emotion we feel for our children is also unique. Blacks and other low IQ groups don't even attempt to rear their children, just leaving them feral on the streets to tend for themselves. Asians do care deeply for their children, but in such a strict and cold manner, that it leaves the children very unhappy throughout. An Asian helping their kid probably has strict curfews, requires they study a lot, forbids them from dating until they're out of college, and so on. Sure, it works, and they rear their children to succeed in life, but it isn't the love I'm searching for. There is something incredibly heartwarming about a happy home. A happy home is like a holy grail. When one comes upon children who laugh, parents who gaze at each other lovingly, and siblings who stand up for each other or look after one another, you have reached heaven. A white heaven. A feature of life so rarely seen anywhere else, unique to our Jane Austen novel existence, our white spirit. Gazing upon a story where a little sister takes care of her older sister when she's sick or helps her finish her homework because she's hopelessly airheaded, is something deeply more satisfying than watching a kid pass a test or eat healthily due to a parent's diligent oversight.

So one thing is clear, in a malthusian universe like ours, where every baby counts, and every person living means someone else can never be born -- not now, and not in the future, as the resource is entropically lost forever -- we should be looking for people who are best capable of progress, people who are happy, and people who already are closest to our ideal man. Even if Asians were closer to perfection, their lack of progress would be a worrisome factor. Only whites have shown themselves capable of great leaps of innovation and change. Only whites produce revolution after revolution, each dramatically more impressive than the last. We change our music, our art, our literature, and our knowledge of chemistry, biology, math, and physics at a blazing speed. Every other day we come out with a patent for some new invention. For instance, we just discovered how to make sperm cells from stem cells. Where were the africans who made that invention possible? Where were the mexicans? It always falls to the white man to make progress. Without us, where would the world be? What are the odds it would ever improve again? When you add everything up, the answer is clear. Utility wise, the average white is more valuable than the average non-white on earth. They are the best of humanity, the best life can offer. Therefore, maximizing whites while minimizing all other races and lifeforms, is the best possible path for our future.

Just as obviously as racism, other conclusions follow. For instance, straights lead a better life than gays, so eliminating gays so that there is more room for straights, becomes sensible. Intelligent people lead better lives than dumb people, so eliminating dumb people so there is more room for smart people, becomes sensible. Mentally insane and retarded cripples are less valuable than healthy babies, so we should eliminate them, free up the resources, and spend those resources on new children with real potential and value. Discrimination is pretty universal, it doesn't stop on just race. Once it's clear one life form is superior to another, there's very little left to argue about, except how we should go about replacing the latter with the former. The idea that the inferior should simply stick around, and be left to its own devices, that it should be allowed to prosper and even triumph, is absurd.

The calculation needn't be this crude however. There is no reason why we can't favor exceptional non-whites over whites. There is no reason why we can't favor some whites over others. There is no reason why we can't seek to bestow 'whiteness' on nonwhites and thus convert them into more of us, instead of exterminate them and have more babies ourselves. There is no reason why we couldn't try to interbreed and create new characteristics that ameliorate the faults of others, or accentuate their strengths. There is still a lot of latitude on where to go from here. However, there is no way to avoid becoming a racist antisemite. There is no way to not believe in white racial superiority, there is no way to not be disgusted with the lifestyles and behavior of jews and blacks, there is no way to be neutral when it comes to white racial suicide, there is no way to avoid the truth that the future by all rights belongs to us and we of all people have the past to prove it. All of these things make you racist by default, regardless of the means you choose to employ to pursue your values. Whether the means are fluffy or vicious, the ends will justify them. Es ist mir egal, as the Germans would phrase it. I don't care how we get to where we need to be, I just care that we get there. Anything that works, we should do that. In the face of the trillions of people yet to come and the quality of their lives, any suffering we cause in the world of today is meaningless. Any harm we cause will be made up in the billions of years to come, amid lifeforms so grand we have no conception of their worth, that we and we alone made possible, through the actions we took here and now. Their existence justifies anything we might do to make them possible, just as their loss is immeasurably higher than any loss we might suffer today. Therefore, we should be willing to sacrifice anything, and destroy anything, that gets in their existence's way. Fanaticism is the logical consequence of Atheist Materialist Utilitarian Malthusianism, and it's sheer nonsense to be a moderate once you've come this far. Sheer cowardice.

By pushing for Atheism, Utilitarianism, or Malthusianism, you are a shadow warrior for racism, homophobia, cognitive elitism, antisemitism, and so on. By arguing against Atheism, Utilitarianism, or Malthusianism, you are a shadow warrior for the death of the white race and a new dark age. Whether people realize it or not, the battlelines are not fought at 'racism' vs. 'anti-racism.' They are fought at a much deeper level, between God vs. Man, Objective vs. Subjective, Absolute vs. Relative, the belief that we can 'earn' and 'produce' vs. the dismal science that we can only consume and the 2nd law of thermodynamics is our doom. Unless all your ducks are in a row, racism will never be the sensible alternative. Unless we get everyone else's philosophical ducks in a row, they will never conclude that they should be racists.

Buchanen showed how fruitless it was to be a religious racist in his article about evolution, the same is true of anyone who attempts to be pro-white, but cannot get their philosophical act together. Unless you stand on sound logical principles, you'll inevitably falter at some point. For instance, you won't accept the ends justify the means, and thus you'll be powerless to implement the only program that could possibly save the white race. Or you'll grow weary of the world and put your hope in the next life sorting everything out for you. Or you'll give up and turn to drugs and alcohol. Or you'll think we can somehow build our way out of our structural difficulties, by just making a little more money or a little better technology, that can eventually solve all our problems. The mistakes are many, the path narrow. We'll never get anywhere, until our feet stand firmly upon the one and only Truth that governs this world. From there, we can achieve anything. Without it, we'll never amount to a farthing.

If atheist utilitarian malthusianism ever became the dominant philosophy of the earth, you can bet racism would succeed in the course of around two days or so -- everyone would agree with it and endorse it heartily. Until these beliefs dominate the earth, racism will always be an undesirable fringe -- even if you scream until you're blue in the face. The choice is yours. Champion racism's prerequisites, or abandon them and thus racism as well. You can't have it both ways.