No Laws, Just Membership Criteria:

I don't like coercion.  Who does?  And yet rules are required for people to get along harmoniously and cooperate constructively with each other.  How do we get around this paradox?

The answer is something the private sector has understood and availed itself of for a long time now -- no coercion, just membership criteria.

If you want to hang out with this group, using these facilities, etc, then you must obey the bylaws and strictures and contracts you've entered into with the other members of the club.

The club's entry requirements can be set at any arbitrary level, nobody automatically has the right to belong to a club.  Before you join a club, everyone else has to approve, and the way to streamline that approval system is that everyone agrees on standards prospective members must meet, and if anyone is found to meet those standards they're approved automatically.  If they can't meet the standards they don't get in.  They'd be a nuisance to the people there who only want to be around others like themselves, and so they're shooed away to be someone else's problem.

Moral free riders are people who benefit from an orderly, cooperative, kind, charitable, friendly, etc society which builds all sorts of institutions and systems which they take advantage of, while not contributing the exact same traits themselves that makes the society buzz along so efficiently.  It's nice to be in a place that doesn't litter, but it's doubly nice to litter all you like while others clean up after you because they don't like litter.  The purpose of membership criteria is to weed out moral free riding.  All members of a club benefit from its atmosphere, that's why they gathered together in the first place, because they enjoy each other's company.  Correspondingly, it's important that all members of a club are creating that atmosphere, or soon enough the atmosphere will disappear and the whole thing will collapse, contributors and parasites alike losing what attracted them to the club in the first place.

Therefore, the penalty for littering, in a private arrangement where everyone has agreed not to litter, is not the current system of fines, jail time or the death penalty.  There are no cops going around enforcing the laws.  No constant system of judges and juries and endless inspections to see if you're obeying the law.  The penalty for any and every violation of membership criteria is getting thrown out of the club.  If you won't obey its strictures, you're no longer welcome here.

The penalty for every violation of the rules is exile.  There is no lesser penalty and no greater penalty, you're just no longer a member of the community.  You couldn't meet the criteria and so you no longer belong.  Since you don't feel like fulfilling your role in this community, go find some other community that you're more comfortable with and go follow their rules.  This isn't coercion, it's just recognizing reality.  You don't belong here, so you're better off going somewhere else where you can hang out with other people like yourself.  Moral free riders, who like an atmosphere they themselves are tearing down, have zero claim to abuse or oppression for not being tolerated.  To state the argument is absurd enough to shut it down.

I don't want a nation.  I don't want a police force.  I don't want coercion.  I want private property, with all the members of the club joint owners of the land and all of its public facilities, and clear membership criteria so that everyone in the community is loved, respected, and welcomed by everyone else in the community.  And I want people who clearly don't belong to be hounded out by a spontaneously coalesced mob who chases them out of town, the end.  We will all know who they are.  We will talk to each other about their indiscretions, and the secret will out, because we're a tight knit community and we won't tolerate flagrant violations of our norms, which would soon snowball into the complete dissolution of everything we love about our lives and our environment if overlooked.

In a land like this, no one can say they have a right to impose themselves on others.  In the first place, everyone will sign a contract from the beginning stipulating that they only have a provisional right to stay in the community, based upon conduct that fulfills the strictures of our fair city.  Like how a renter does not have the right to stay in their leased apartment if they violate the lease, nobody has a right to stay in a city they contracted to get along with if they don't get along with it.  Secondarily, if a private individual can demand that other private individuals accept their presence as guests on private property, that's essentially no different from a man barging into your house and demanding they have the right to stay indefinitely, or a boy plopping himself down on your bed at night and saying he feels like being your boyfriend from here on, or simply inserting his dick into your vagina with the explanation that, even though he was never invited, he really feels he has a right to put it wherever he so pleases and it would be rude to deny him entry.

It isn't necessary that the club's criteria be somehow objectively fair or justifiable or worthy.  If it's the pink elephant appreciation club, we can rightfully demand that everyone who wants in appreciates pink elephants.  Likewise, no woman has to justify her rejection of a mate, it doesn't need some objective proof that she isn't biased against you.  For any reason or no reason at all, private individuals can object to the company of other private individuals.  Everyone has the right to be left alone, first and foremost.  Above any consideration of your right to hospitality or fair treatment or any other words that dress up the fact that you're simply barging into a place uninvited and unwanted and making a nuisance of yourself to everyone there.

This society, aimed towards mutually beneficial and harmonious living via the creation of useful public goods (like roads, workplaces, hospitals, etc) and enriching private relationships (like friends, mating couples, sports teams and hobbyist circles), certainly wants lots of people to join, but only the sort of people who will enrich their neighbors and fulfill the original goals of the gathering in the first place.  You're there to enrich the lives of others and be enriched by their presence.  It's a mutually beneficial contract.  Everyone has to pull their own weight.

And the way you pull your own weight isn't necessarily to be rich and make lots of goods and services other people need to live by.  In fact, in the age of robot production we're entering, that's pretty much the last consideration anyone should be worrying about.  At least, in my 'x appreciation society,' wealth wouldn't be a consideration in the least.  Certainly other clubs could set up other members who filtered by income, and they're welcome to all gather together on that basis.  The company I wish to keep isn't a bunch of materialist snobs in the first place.

The way you pull your own weight in my club rules is to not be a moral eyesore.  Don't be evil.  Don't be wretched.  Don't be obnoxious.  The way you enliven the atmosphere is that people look your way and their heart glows and shines a little, because they're looking at something noble and inspirational.  And the reason you're there isn't because everyone else is rich and you wanted to check out their palaces, it's because you wanted to look upon their glory and bask in their warmth and light just like they're basking in yours.  It's because you're comfortable together, respect each other, and most importantly are not revolted by each other.

The moral filth, if it could just be made visible on people's outer layer of skin, is so thick and deep in our criteria-less society that it would have us all puking the moment we left our houses.  Actually, our families are so steeped in sin we'd probably be retching and gagging indoors as well.

Everything else from this simple stricture follows.  If you're not a moral blight, a moral eyesore, a disgusting worm, then inevitably you'll cost little to maintain, be helpful and earnest at work, be loyal and supportive towards your spouse, compassionate and educational towards your children, conscientious towards the environment and your neighbors, so forth and so on.  If you want a long list of specifications on how not to be evil, just consult my 'the vast majority of people are evil' permapost and then do the opposite of what they're doing.

A short rundown of obvious 'do nots' could be summarized as:

Don't cheat (on your lover, or at cards for that matter.)

Don't divorce.

Don't assault, murder, or rape people.

Don't steal.

No corruption of any kind.

Don't break things, especially things that aren't yours.

Be kind to animals and mother nature.  Keep the city welcoming, livable and beautiful.

No sexual promiscuity, smoking, drinking, gambling, drugs, obesity, or any other vicious behavior.

Don't needlessly insult people.

Don't lie.

Don't believe ridiculous lies.

Don't get cocky about meaningless things.

Maintain proper decorum (in appearance, noise level, smell, choice of words, no tatoos, no piercings, etc, such that you aren't a bother to others)

Don't pester people.  No means no.

Don't let others get away with any of the above either.

But above all, don't be a moral blight, don't be a moral eyesore, don't be a moral free rider.  So if there's something that qualifies as such and isn't on my list, don't do that either.  Common sense should reign supreme in the absence of endless bylaws.

These are the 'do nots.'  But I don't think that is sufficient to create an ideal community.  There should also be a set of 'do's.'  Just as many clubs have club fees, I see no reason why having the privilege of hanging out with so many great people shouldn't also come at a price of 'unreasonable' demands on top of simply the bare minimum of not hurting others.

So here are additional club membership criteria in order to live in Vinland:

Be white.  (And no, Jews aren't welcome, for reasons explained below.)

Be a white supremacist.

Be straight.

Speak English.

Don't belong to any organized religion.

Marry before the age of 20.

Have at least two children, all of whom must be eugenically screened for maximum quality.

Every month, starting at the age of six, completely consume at least one artistic work on my hall of fame of great art lists and genuinely enjoy it, for the rest of your life.  In addition, by the age of fifteen, everyone must have read, understood, and appreciated all the permaposts on this blog.  (This is the only education I'm concerned with.  In fact, being opposed to any other type of compulsory education is another requirement.)

Come to the defense of the motherland when called upon.

Love your country, your people, the history and culture and principles that got you here (including the Confederacy, Colonialism, the Romans, the Greeks, Nazi Germany, America up until 1861, Europe up until 1939, South Africa until the fall of Apartheid, etc), and make this clear verbally and vociferously whenever their honor is challenged or defamed.

Aspire for the stars, the future, and transcendence as our ultimate goal.  Never be content.

Provide for a citizen's dividend generously and without any grumbling, set to always be at least 1/10 of the average gdp per capita of society as a whole, just as you freely and without guilt should partake of it.  No one should want for basic necessities in the modern world.

With these policies in place, a wonderful living environment would be created.  Homogeneity both in fact and in spirit, a sense of pride in our identities looking towards the past and our common futures, a sense of everyone being in it together and no one being left behind, and a shared culture where everyone knows our most cherished stories so that everyone can relate behind their common lessons and themes, would create ineffable bonds of infinite value, ropes of light criss-crossing the city such that even at night we're always ablaze.

I do not deny the fact that other criteria consisting of other members might do as well or better than Vinland's.  But that is immaterial.  So long as everyone in Vinland subscribes to these club rules in this little patch of home, their solidarity will make up for any defect.  Their solidarity will be their greatest strength, if you'll forgive the pun.  We don't need the 'fairest rules' using the most 'objectively meritorious human material' like we're some sort of business or factory floor.  What we need is to love each other, and human nature has shown that this is nigh impossible through any other means than the sorting listed above.  The 'pink elephant appreciation society' doesn't really care if the warbler is objectively more aesthetic.  That doesn't mean they have to invite all birdwatchers into the club, because hey, warbler lives matter too.  This is the pink elephant appreciation society.  Mock it all you want, by all means sniff and walk on.  For us pink elephant lovers, it's just fine the arbitrary way it is.  No one's forcing you to enter the club.  In fact, people who hate pink elephant lovers and insult it non-stop are the last people we want to spend any time around.  This is the pink elephant appreciating society, and we own this private patch of land, so we've assembled and arranged it just the way we like.  The bird watching society is down the road. By all means, if pink elephants aren't your thing, hit the road, and don't let the door hit you on the way out~

 

Just Say No to Jews:

I have nothing against Jews as individuals.  They're an admirable people clearly capable of great things who have contributed a lot to humanity across the ages.  However, when they act as a collective, they insatiably pursue the course of white gentile nations' destruction.  For thousands of years, they've done nothing but undermine and sabotage and tear down every nation we ever try to build up for ourselves.  Whether it's Rome, Byzantium, Spain, Russia, Germany, the USA, or anywhere on Earth, there you will always find Jewish termites trying to undermine our cohesion, betray us to outsiders, degenerate our morals, steal our money, outright kill us all, or plotting at some other scheme.

At this point, whether it came about through coincidence and 'nurture' or whether its an instinctive aspect of their 'nature' is completely irrelevant.  It doesn't matter if we started it and they're just responding to our aggression.  It doesn't matter who's to blame.  A record of 1,000 flips and 1,000 heads is proof enough that living alongside Jews is never going to flip 'tails' the next time.  We're never going to get along.  We're never going to sing kumbayah.  It just doesn't work.

If it's true that wherever gentiles gather they end up persecuting innocent poor Jews, that's all the more reason to separate.  We can't persecute Jews anymore if there aren't any in our vicinity, now can we?  They should be as happy to be free of us as we are happy to be free of them.  Therefore it's totally irrelevant if Jews are the victims or the abusers.  What's relevant is that we've tried to get along since Roman times and it's never, ever worked.

There's just too much bad blood between us.  We'll never forget the Holodomor and they'll never forget the Holocaust.  We're never going to forgive each other.  These things don't just fade away, they're formative moments.  Jews destroyed the America we loved with the 1965 Immigration Act, the civil rights movement, feminism, Boaz's and Gould's fraudulent 'debunking' of IQ, etc.  They destroyed Russia with Bolshevism, then destroyed Nazi Germany via Russia, America and Britain, all of whom had a powerful Jewish faction inciting these great powers to war with a country that was just trying to get its own land and people back from Polish usurpers.  Were they the decisive factor in these historical moments?  Who cares?  Does it really matter?  If they didn't do it all on their own, it's enough to know what they wanted done to us, and none of it was to our benefit.  If they weren't powerful enough to pull off all their plots and schemes against gentile powers, it's enough to know what they, in their own words, were aiming for, and how much they desired to use these avenues to bring down every last remaining good place on Earth.  They hated what we loved and tried to destroy what we wanted to protect.  You can debate until the cows come home whether they were responsible for what happened or not, but it's completely undebatable that they certainly wished to be responsible if they could ever manage it.

Right now, Jews are talking with glee about leading the destruction of Sweden via the swamping of the country with immigrants.  They are gloating about the demographic death of white America with 'tick tock, tick tock' speeches.  They are at the very fore and head of organizations specifically devoted to our destruction.  The ADL, the SPLC, anti-fascist action, on and on and on.  Would it have happened anyway?  Maybe.  Did we create all this animus and it's all backlash from the Holocaust and other unjust oppression through the ages?  Sure, why not.  Does that somehow exculpate how Jews have been treating us and what is in their hearts all this time?  Not in the least.  Their hatred and their eliminationist end game for the white race, no matter how it came about, and no matter whether it is strong enough to achieve anything on its own, is reason enough to no longer wish to commingle with them, or interact with them, or speak to them ever again.

Why on Earth would we want to continue associating with a collective aggregate of people who deny our very right to exist, call us the cancer of human history, rejoice in the day we'll be wiped off the face of the Earth, blah blah blah.  Soon enough they'll be demanding we end our uniquely evil racist instincts and genes forever by miscegenating with diversity or face legal consequences.  It's the obvious endgame after all the rhetoric they've used so far.  There's no reason why we have to hang around, beg and grovel at their feet, apologize to them for our past history of crimes against them, worship at their Holocaust Memorials, give constant charity to Israel, etc, etc, etc.  This is an abusive relationship.  It's a completely one sided relationship.  There is no reason for us to participate in it any longer.

Theoretically, down some alternate timeline, perhaps Jews and gentiles could have gotten along.  We could have been one people, shared in each other's genius, and profited by one another, eventually melding into one race.  This just isn't that timeline.  They will never drop their animus, and due to their endless quest for revenge against us, we will never be able to cool our passions concerning them either.  The cycle of hatred and revenge will never end, it can never end until one or the other of us is gone forever.

So long as Jews remain as Jews, they'll demand to be accepted as diverse and separate Jews.  And once diversity and separateness is tolerated in a society, the principle must be expanded to infinity, and all other types of diversity must also be allowed, or else the right to Jewish diversity will be threatened as well, because no one puts up with unprincipled exceptions for long.  If something is incongruous to our moral code, if it creates cognitive dissonance, the discomfort will at some point reach a fever pitch and we'll question the issue with "why on Earth are we opposed to all diversity except Jewish diversity, which is part of our founding ethos as something we must coexist with?"  The only way this seesaw can tilt is up or down.  Either Jews must also leave, or everyone else must enter.  The coexist bumper sticker has every symbol they could fit on there, it isn't just a star of David.  You can't have one without all the others.  (Which is why we can't allow an unprincipled exception for any other group either, no matter how appealing they might look in abstract.  There is no deal where they get in that doesn't ultimately lead to infinite diversity of all types in order to protect the principle of the original diversity that was just one, acceptable, 'exception' type.)

The moment a Jew identifies himself as a Jew and says 'you should allow us Jews in too,' they are already creating a diverse non-white group that is supposed to be in a non-diverse, homogeneous gathering.  They've already undermined the community before the full sentence of their argument could even be made.  If I said, 'this is a white only country,' and Finns responded with 'you should let Finns in too,' even if I thought originally that Finns should be included because they are obviously white, the very fact that they felt they should be let in as Finns and not whites is evidence enough that they are too far separate from us and actually they shouldn't be let in after all.


Now if a few Jewish individuals want to sneak into our country, marry gentiles, never call themselves Jews and never think of themselves as Jews and never advocate for Jews or Jewish positions or the Jewish version of history, never lecturing us or censoring us on the issue of anti-semitism, I would never be able to tell the difference, and I wouldn't run an inquisition in order to root them out and stop them.  But the moment Jews as Jews are given a position in what is supposed to be a new right thinking racist society, you can kiss that society goodbye.  Not only will the racism be abolished in the name of protecting the Jewish minority, but soon enough the white majority will also be liquidated 'just in case we ever get any ideas.'  The Jews will never stop until we are powerless to harm them any more.  The level of paranoia and hatred of gentile whites in the Jewish community is immeasurable at this point in history.  There's simply no going back to the good old days, whenever those were.  We are post Holocaust now, and Jews are still remembering affronts from the Egyptians and Persians thousands of years ago.

Yes, Jews look white to me.  Yes, they're very smart and competent people.  Yes, they pay more in taxes than they receive.  Yes, they're responsible for great works of art and science.  Yes, they can be charming, funny, well behaved friends and family you've never had a single hostile impulse towards in your life.  No, none of it matters in the least.  I'm amazed we're still having this debate after all this time, all this history, all this relentless Jewish hostility that is shoved in our face by the Jewish media every hour of every day for our very existence, our history, our heroes, our culture, our moral values, everything we've ever held dear.  How much abuse must a wife take before she's allowed to leave the home and take the kids with her?  Do we really have to wait until, in a fit of rage, Jews kill every last white gentile nation on Earth with their unrelenting hostility and humiliation of the natives, third world immigration waves, undermining of the nuclear family, etc, etc?

If racists and racism are to survive, they can never do so alongside Jews.  There are no Jewish fellow travelers, the moment they identified themselves as Jews first and whites second, it was already over and any relationship between us was already impossible.  The moment they started negotiating with us and saying 'we'll give you the moral dispensation to be racist so long as you're not anti-semitic, we'll give you legitimacy and respectability so long as you look the other way concerning us,' I assure you all momentum and all hope for our nation has already been lost.  We can't even get off the ground and out of the mud and launch our ships to the distant shores so long as these Jewish commissars and minders and albatrosses remain in control and dictating the terms of our movements to us.  Why on Earth are we negotiating with them for our very right to exist?  Why is this something we have to negotiate with anyone?

It's okay to tell the truth about blacks, but you can never tell the truth about Jews.  So, truth is already out the window.  What are we fighting for anymore?  If we're going to be forced to lie anyway, what difference does it make how many lies we're required to mouth a day?  The humiliation and debasement is equal after just one lie.  Just stepping on the fumie once was enough to break the entire Japanese christian movement.  We can be racist but not anti-semitic?  We can separate from blacks but not jews?  Give me a break.  If we can't do completely and fully what we want, we can't do anything at all.  That's just how the human psyche works.  No one is going to be motivated for a half measure.  No one is going to die for a new nation that makes us be PC only 1/2 as often, until the Jews ratchet the level of thought controls back up again to full.  No one is going to live fully and passionately in the hopes of becoming a slightly less diverse country than before.  If you want to give someone an inspirational vision, it never starts with half measures and compromises and giving away the farm before we even reached it.  We must demand perfection and we must never compromise our hopes and dreams away.  Never, never, never, never, never!  I won't ask anyone to live or die for anything short of heaven.  Truth, beauty, and love.  All the truth, all the beauty, and all the love possible under the stars.  All the time.  Not sometimes.  Not on just some topics or in some ways, but under all circumstances and in every way.

We're going to get our Vinland, and Jews can go get their liberal diverse utopia, or move to Israel, or do whatever the hell they want wherever else on Earth they want to go.  I'm just asking for one tiny corner of the Earth outside of their zone of control.  Just one place gentile whites can be free of them and all of their poisonous influences once and for all.  This isn't something we should have to compromise over.  We're already asking for just the right to be left alone.  Why on Earth should we have to compromise one jot or tittle from there?

Anti-anti-semitism is madness.  "I'm against all this PC stuff but of course sometimes racism goes too far. . ."  Oh spare me the lectures.  Go feel morally superior with all your liberal friends.  There's not a lick of difference between the two of you.  Just go feel smug and objective and open minded with all of them, and go call us all the names you love to call us together.  And while you're at it take the racist gay lovers with you.  Next there will be racists who want to make an exception for gypsies.  ::rolls eyes::  "They've lived alongside us all this time, they make great music, we share gypsio-christian values, there's no way we could ever separate now, gypsies look white to me!"

If you're not a neo-nazi white supremacist, get out of the movement.  Anything not explicitly opposed to liberalism eventually morphs into liberalism.  It's just a matter of time and steps before you're right back where you started again, a lickspittle to the Jews.  Neo-nazi white supremacists are the counterrevolutionaries.  Everyone else is just a reactionary, thinking, 'well sure we should liquidate the Mensheviks, but isn't killing Trotsky going a little too far?'  If you're still dithering at this late stage, still trying to bestride a middle ground, when the majority of children in virtually all white nations are now or within the century will be non-white and the bell of doom is already ringing over our heads, just get out of the movement and get out of the way.  Cowards aren't needed anymore.  Ditherers and fiddlers aren't needed any more.  Just go prate away to someone who cares.  There's no more time for compromises.  We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.

I know the arguments used to defend Jews, they just aren't convincing:

Many arguments have been made for why Jews aren't to blame for anything, and antisemitism is a baseless hatred that grips losers and conspiracy theorists all around the world seemingly at random.  Like how all water eventually flows down into the sewage system, all losers/bigots/evildoers/idiots eventually end up becoming antisemites.  It's the universal law of gravitation applied to humans, the higher mass of worthlessness you are, the higher your attraction to antisemitism, the invariable constant of mankind's entire history.

This is the actual argument made by anti-antisemites.  The reason everyone on Earth has hated and persecuted Jews across all history is not that Jews are awful people who piss off everyone on Earth across all of history, it's because everyone on Earth across all history are so evil that they inevitably persecute the innocent Jews.  Either humans are innately worthless, as proven by the prevalence of antisemitism, or a more sophisticated theory goes that Jews are such good people, so successful in life due to their wonderful virtue and merit, that inevitably everyone else around them grows envious and thus hateful towards them, wishing they could be like Jews and have what Jews have but knowing they can never get it because they're losers, unlike their Jewish neighbors.

A sign of a truly virtuous, meritorious person, is his lack of antisemitism, because it shows he has no need to be envious of Jews because he's their equal or better.  So the higher class you are, the less envious of Jews you become, the less baselessly antisemitic you become.  And of course, anyone who spreads antisemitic conspiracy theories or tropes always inevitably turns out to be some low class loser, thus proving the theory true.

But what happens when you point out that virtually every famous philosopher and writer, from Kant to Fichte to Charles Dickens to Solzhenitsyn to Dostoyevsky to George Orwell to Shakespeare to everybody who's anybody, were people who pushed antisemitic tropes and conspiracy theories and thought poorly of Jews?  Churchill wrote a long article on how ridiculously Jewish the Bolshevik Revolution was and the initial Jewish representation in Lenin's revolutionary government.  Is Churchill low class?  Ulysses Grant, President of the USA and the Civil War general who won the war for the North where all other competitors with Lee could not, complained of the Jews and exiled them from his administered territory.  President Nixon likewise complained of the Jews.  You can laugh at and mock Kanye West for being a loser who fits the bill of just the sort of person who becomes an antisemite, but he's one of the richest and most famous and popular artists to have ever lived.  Of course Hitler and his entire government ran one of the most powerful, learned and meritorious countries in history -- how did they achieve such power by being low class losers who can't tie their own shoelaces and are just envious of Jewish success?

But I don't need Kanye West or Hitler or whoever, literally everybody of any distinguishment hates Jews.  Even Karl Marx hated Jews, and he was a Jew!  The Roman historians, the most esteemed men of their age, wrote bitterly about how bothersome and destructive Jews were.  The Bible itself, written by Jews, is a long chronicle of Jewish misbehavior, saying that God hated Jews and was constantly punishing them because they were so stupid and recalcitrant!  Jesus went around whipping Jews!

Go back a few years, a century or two, and there isn't a single person who did not traffic in 'antisemitic tropes and conspiracy theories.'  Of course all the despised peasants hated Jews (and why wouldn't they, the Jews were usurers who charged them 20, 30% interest on loans they needed to survive, they were tax collectors who would ruthlessly rob the peasantry at the behalf of the nobility far more than farmers could afford to pay, they were alcohol peddlers who would tempt poor people into expenses they couldn't afford and dissolution that led to the inability to work and provide for themselves, and universally, in every era, they refused to ever do any honest work.  It was always pawn shops, banking, tax collecting, slavetrading, pimping, this, that, or the other, but never farming, blacksmithing, soldier.  Like ticks they were always swollen rich, fat men living off the actual producers who were always rail thin and never got to keep any portion of their own wealth production.)

But those peasants were just losers, right?  If they were as smart and hardworking as Jews they could be the rich bankers so they only have themselves to blame.  Okay, I get it.  Fuck the working poor.  But what do you say to the eminent men of letters, the philosophers and historians and Presidents and Priests, who spent their whole lives in leisure, who didn't have to envy anyone, who were at the apex of society, far above anything Jews could achieve, who hated Jews as much or more than the peasants?  Martin Luther started the entire Protestant Revolution.  He is a lightbringer, a chosen one, someone so far above the regular class of man, a man who singlehandedly changed history like Jesus.  Guess what, he hated Jews too and condemned them in treatise after treatise!  Oh, but he was just prejudiced because of his religion.  Okay, so what about the atheists who hated Jews like Voltaire?  What about the Romans who could care less what religion you were and were a religiously pluralistic society that accepted Jews and pagans of all stripes equally?  Why did they hate Jews and crush them in war after war?  They weren't low class scum, they were Emperors of the most powerful country in the history of the world.

It is true that due to a recent rise to prominence of Jews, such that they're at least 50% of the powerful people in America, and due to America's outsized influence on the world that power radiates all across the globe such that no one feels safe criticizing Jews anymore, high class people very rarely criticize Jews anymore.  But of course this is a self-fulfilling prophecy.  No one who criticizes Jews in the world today can remain high class anymore because they will immediately be 'canceled' and their class will immediately become low again.  With that kind of power, to make anyone you dislike an instant loser, it's no wonder all antisemites are worthless losers who are just 'jealous.'

Of course anti-antisemites have an explanation for this phenomena too.  It's not that Jews are canceling your high class status, firing you from your job, kicking you out of college, divorcing you, losing the next election, cutting you off from Twitter, ruining your reputation in the press, or whatever.  It's all men of conscience, sanity and good will who are doing that to you, because what you did is so awful, so stupid, so insane, that of course you'd be punished.  Jews have as much a right to condemn and punish you as other people of conscience, sanity and good will, so it's just a coincidence when Jews punish you for your antisemitism.  Even in a place with no Jews you'd be punished just the same by the upper class echelons, because they're as well mannered as upper class Jews, and so they behave in the same disgusted way towards you as upper class Jews would.  How could anyone be an antisemite in this day and age, knowing the lessons of the Holocaust, knowing how many Nobel Prizes Jews have won, knowing how much good in the world Jews have done and how many successful businesses they run?

This explanation is also used in Revenge of the Sith.  When Anakin claims that Obi Wan has ruined his personal life, "You turned her against me!"  He replies smugly, as a high class winner to a low class loser who can't even keep from getting divorced, "You did that yourself."

You see, when you betray what a worthless scumbag you are, by slaughtering younglings or criticizing Jews or disagreeing with Jewish-invented-and-Jewish-pushed ideologies, the results that follow are all on your own head, a natural consequence of your own stupidity and evil.  Maybe you shouldn't slaughter younglings, Anakin!

In fact Obi Wan did turn Padme against Anakin, by misrepresenting the power struggle between the Jedi and the Senate as somehow the Jedi being this holy force of righteousness and Palpatine just randomly being evil because he cackles at the thought of being evil, not because he wanted to reform the mess the Old Republic and the Jedi had made of the galaxy, which then undermines the justification Anakin gave to Padme that he "would not betray the Senate," and would see to it that the Jedi answered for their crimes of an attempted anti-democratic coup.  But nevermind who was right in that case, maybe you shouldn't slaughter younglings, either way, I vociferously deny the fact that antisemites merit the punishment handed down to them because they're evil/insane/stupid/jealous, and not because they're oppressed truth tellers trying to save the world.

It is undeniable that Jews have a great deal of power and have exerted a great deal of influence in the modern world.  Both sides of this debate agree on this.  We all know how rich Jews are, how overrepresented they are in the entertainment business which creates our fiction, in the news media which creates our non-fiction, how much money they donate to politicians during election campaigns, that they own all the social media companies aside from Twitter which they are now trying to destroy, how many Supreme Court justices are Jewish, how many Cabinet members are Jewish, how many Senators and Representatives are Jewish, how many famous and esteemed 'influencers' are Jewish, like Boaz the anthropologist, or Gloria Steinem the feminist, or Freud the psychologist, or Marx the communist, how many social movements began with the Jews, like the Civil Rights Act, the Immigration Act, the ending of Apartheid in South Africa, etc.  Jews are front and center and everyone knows it, on both sides.  Biden casually said to a group of Jews that gay marriage was entirely due to them, and then added 'and that's a good thing.'  That's the only difference.  Philosemites say all the power Jews wield has been for the modern world's good, and antisemites say it's been to the modern world's detriment.

That's it!  It's not tropes, stereotypes, or conspiracy theories.  Both sides agree on all the facts, and that they are ironclad facts.  We just draw different conclusions from the exact same dataset.  One side thinks every generation of Americans doubling their percentage of LGBTQIAness is good, the other side says it is bad.  Bill Maher, a Jew, admits that the percentage is doubling every generation, he showed a graph of it on his own show.  This isn't a conspiracy theory or a trope.  The only difference is our conclusions.

I am not antisemitic because I'm stupid, insane, evil or jealous, it's not because I'm a low class loser, it's because I think Jewish power, in aggregate, is changing the world for the worse.  That the changes Jews vanguarded over the last couple centuries have all made the world worse, and I wish they hadn't done them.

And yes, I know the next anti-anti-semite argument, that Jews aren't responsible for the progressive movement around the world.  They aren't responsible for feminism, open borders immigration, gay tolerance, wars starting, etc.  That those things were all baked in the cake, inevitable historical destinies, due to the overwhelming consensus of all high class people, Jewish or not, or the impossible to divert historical necessities of past events like new technologies or the outcomes of previous wars or economic cycles or whatever.

I don't care.  Let's grant that Jews don't matter at all, that everything would happen in the exact same manner if Jews had all argued and donated and voted against these changes instead of for them.  (I don't believe that, but let's grant it for the sake of argument.)  That's as stupid an argument as Brutus saying that by the time he stabbed Julius Caesar he was destined to die anyway.  It was a historical necessity, all the other high class Senators were already doing it, so what are you blaming me for?

Because, Brutus, you stabbed Caesar.  You killed him.  You betrayed your own benefactor who treated you like a son.  You overthrew a working, good government and threw it into a bloody chaos which would go on to cost tens of thousands of lives, or God knows how many.  You made a horrible decision on a personal level, and on a political level, you did it and you can't deny it.  I don't need to know anything more -- I don't need to know how many other Senators stabbed Caesar or what economic cycle drove you to kill Caesar or whatever.  You did it!  That portion of the question is undeniable.  You still did it!  I can hate Brutus for just that!  I can blame Brutus for just that!  Brutus is burning in the lowest circle of Hell in Dante's Inferno, being chomped on by Satan's jaws, because he's a traitor that Dante reviled, like Judas, as the lowest form of human scum.

Dante didn't say, "well, yeah, Brutus did kill Caesar, but you have to look at Marius and Sulla's reigns, and the weather in China, and how much wheat was selling for at the time, and all in all does it really matter, Julius was dying sooner or later anyway."

Dante said, "Brutus is burning in hell because he committed the sin of betrayal."  Dante didn't have to prove anything more.  He didn't have to provide any additional context!  And I don't have to either!

So, going back to the only thing that matters, are the modern day's changes that Jews pushed for good or bad, I think the vast majority of Americans agree with me.  Most Americans agree America is on the wrong track.  Most Americans agree things were better back in the 1950's.  Most Americans, like me, are revolted at these tranny child surgeries.  Most Americans do not like Hillary attending Satanic performances where creepy people hold up bloody decapitated goat heads and call it 'art.'  Most Americans do not like that Epstein palled around with all the most famous and powerful people in America and then died mysteriously before he could reveal any of his secrets.

This stuff is a slam dunk.  Is it good or is it bad that Americans now have over 100,000 overdose deaths a year?  Is it good or is it bad that we're at war with Russia, who happens to own the largest nuclear arsenal on Earth?  Is it good or is it bad that murders are up 30%?  Is it good or is it bad that American life expectancy is dropping like a rock?  Is it good or is it bad that inflation is around 10%?  Is it good or is it bad that millennials earn less than Baby Boomers did at the same age, despite all the productivity growth in technology between our era and theirs?  Is it good or is it bad that the average weight of an American girl is over 170 pounds?

Everyone knows everything is awful.  Everyone knows it.  Were the changes for the better?  Of course not.  So no, Jews did not deliver paradise on Earth with all the changes they advocated for.  No one thinks that.  Every trend is getting worse, none are getting better.  In the regular lives of regular people, they are less healthy, poorer, more likely to die young, be victimized by crime, have fewer friends, are less likely to marry or have sex or children, straight out report being more depressed, are on more medications, are more likely to be diagnosed as mentally ill, just name me the God damn statistic.  Any statistic.  Any trend at all!  What has the modern world Jews have ushered in given us?  What the hell is this?

To all those people who say feminism, no fault divorce, mass immigration, Black Lives Matter, transgender affirming surgeries, gender unicorns in kindergarten, gay marriage, war with Russia, banning fossil fuels, that all these wonderful innovations pushed by Jews are all for the better and the world is improving every day thanks to all their wonderful theories and efforts, I answer them thus (like Samuel Johnson, I need only kick a stone!)

Jews have shaped this world for over a century and everyone agrees everything is worse than before.  It is untenable to claim that every single innovation Jews are pushing is actually, through some Rube Goldberg like device, through some series of epicycles, good and improving the world, but through some bizarre series of coincidences it just so happens that the world gets worse every year anyway.  No doubt because antisemites are still saying mean tweets or whatever.  I sneer at your hand waving excuses.  You've been in power for a century and everything sucks.  CASE FUCKING CLOSED.  I don't have to argue any further individual points.  I want someone else in power.

Oh, and by the way, if Jews and their ideas aren't responsible for anything that has gone wrong, this can easily be proven.  Kick the Jews out of power, kick them out of the country, change the law to the exact opposite of everything Jews have been lobbying for in the past century, and run the natural experiment.  If you're right and Jews are innocent then the country won't change and everything will keep getting worse down the exact same trend lines.  Give me ten years and if I can't reverse any trend lines I will apologize and commit seppuku for my unfair suspicion of the Jews.  On the other hand, what's the harm in trying?  If we can, in fact, reverse these trends just by getting rid of Jews, why not do so?

In one case we save the world through this one easy trick, and in the other case a few Jews aren't allowed to be rich, powerful influencers for ten years.  Given this Pascal's wager, why not throw the die?

Giving in to immediate despair, saying no one is to blame and nothing can be done, that the world is indeed getting worse but all we can do is watch and wait to die, because antisemitism is even worse, is anti-life.  We should do everything in our power, everything we can, anything we can think of, to try and reverse these trends which are rapidly heading towards human extinction.  Ruling out antisemitism a priori because it makes you feel low class is not putting your priorities straight.

Did white liberals, before Jews, give many of the same arguments and support the exact same policies as Jews do today?  Yes, of course.  But Jewish power is real and undeniable.  Let us say that every bad thing Jews do, some white liberal did before Jews, and will continue to do after Jews.  Who cares?  Remove the Jews and you have that many fewer malevolent influences than before.  Maybe, just maybe, you have enough less power doing the Devil's work that instead of losing to Jews and their white liberal allies we beat the white liberal allies alone.  Isn't it worth a try?  Isn't it worth running the experiment?

Let us say that Jews aren't really the problem, it's the gullible whites who listened to them and were persuaded by them.  Fine, okay!  So what are our options, given that whites are gullible?  I say we remove the Jews and their ideas from gullible white's ears, so they aren't fooled anymore!  What's your plan, keep the Jews and remove the gullible whites from existence?  Is that somehow better?  So we can have gullible whites with no Jews living in paradise because no one is tricking them anymore even though it is so easy to do so, or Jews with no more gullible whites because they all believed and all died.  Does it matter who is to blame?  All that matters is the end state!  What do Jews do after killing off their host?  Cannibalize each other?  Fool each other?  Degenerate each other?  There's no telling because Jews have never lived without a host since the beginning of our historical records.  (I have nothing against self-sufficient Jews living in Israel, I wish they would all move to Israel and never talk to us again, the Jews I am antisemitic against are not the Jews living in Israel, God bless them.  The Jews whose only known method of survival is apex predator/parasite are the Jews I'm talking about in this scenario.)

What do gullible whites do when left to their own devices?  Oh, I know, they go on picnics, build cathedrals, watch football, work, throw up skyscrapers, marry, reproduce, and plant a flag on the moon.  The gullible whites, left to their own devices, live and prosper.  We already know that's what they do because that's what they did!  For thousands of years!

No anti-antisemitic argument holds water when you stop and think about it for five seconds.  I've heard them all.  I've thought about them all.  I could argue them better than the actual believers argue them.  The only difference is I thought one step further and realized it was all bullshit.

My hatred of Jews came about due to a love of truth.  I don't envy them.  I am not drainage water.  I'm not even obsessed with them.  I don't believe God wanted this to be Earth's present or future, and so I'm trying my best to change it.  That's it.  That's all.