Blog Archive

Friday, October 27, 2017

Homogeneity isn't Hate, It's the Solution to Hate:

No one woke up one day and said to themselves, 'gosh darn, people with darker skin color are just ruining my day, if only I could look at white skin at all times life sure would be swell.'  That's not how white nationalism was born.  Nor is that the root impulse of the white nationalist drive to separate, nor is it the basis for why we claim a whites-only country would be a utopia, nor is it the basis for why we think white nationalism works better than 'merit-based immigration/proposition nations/civic nationalism/cognitive stratification/whatever.'

The root basis of white nationalism is reactionary.  We came under unfair and unjustified attack by non-whites, and were shouted down whenever we tried to defend ourselves (like poor James Damore at Google), so we realized that the only possible solution is to separate ourselves from our assailants.  Since there is no legal recourse and the government isn't interested in protecting us from our attackers, the only solution is a new nation where we are protected.  We are entirely innocent and yet have been met with genocidal levels of hostility for the last 80 years or so, nothing has been done to alleviate our put-upon status, and nothing will ever be done until we are physically separated from all our attackers, who come in many forms but the one constant above them all is that they aren't us.

If we could just be among ourselves, all of the unjust accusations, and all of the government/private action taken against us on the basis of these unjust accusations, would disappear overnight.  No other basis of organization can promise us that.  If we sort people by any other system or measurement, the accusations will continue because our accusers will still be among us.

The real reason we want and need an all-white nation is because all non-whites hate us, not because we hate all non-whites.

So long as whites are mixed in with non-whites, the non-whites will accuse us of holding them down, holding them back, brutalizing them, remind us of all our historical atrocities against them, and always demand more unearned wealth, power, and prestige as 'restitution' for our supposed crimes.  They will not stop.  We have asked them politely to stop slandering us with their bullshit lies for the last eighty years, and they have simply redoubled them into more and more extreme versions every year.  They're like Terminators programmed to hunt down and destroy us no matter what.  They are absolutely single-minded in their hatred, resentment, and blame they heap on whites for everything wrong in their lives.  There is no reasoning with these people and there's no possibility of getting along.  They hate us and they want us dead or their eternal worker-slaves they can whip and humiliate and torture for eternity as restitution for our supposed crimes against them.

Since the LGBT community likewise calls us evil oppressors and blames us for all their problems, they likewise must be separated from, because we are just as innocent concerning their awful life choices as we are innocent of blacks shooting each other in Chicago.

The same goes for feminists.  Since they claim all their failures in the workplace are due to male oppression, a charge we are completely innocent of, we can never live alongside them.  Women will always underperform men by all sorts of metrics due to the natural differences between the sexes, which means we will never escape their hatred, resentment, and venom, so long as we live alongside each other, and so long as they demand equality and blame us whenever they fall short.

All we want is to be left alone, free of our accusers.  If we really are to blame for everything that's wrong with everyone else's lives, you'd think they'd be happy to see us go.  But of course it doesn't work that way, they won't be satisfied until we're dead or enslaved, free and separate was never part of their game plan.  And yet we're the haters, for wanting to be free and clear of all the people who hate and persecute us, while they're the power of love and togetherness, because they want to kill or enslave the people they accuse of being worse than Hitler/Satan/whatever.

Once we have a nation of our own, composed solely of white straight men and the women who love, admire and respect them and understand that sexual dimorphism will necessarily lead to differential average outcomes in every aspect of life, there won't be any hate left.  It will be the solution to hate, not the enaction of hate.  It will be the first time in a century our country isn't riven by pure hatred and boiling tensions and frictions every single day in the workplace, at home, in the divorce courts, during elections, etc, etc.  I swear to God, the North and the South never hated each other so much as Americans hate each other now, and have hated each other for the last sixty years.  Bearing this much hate, this much demonization, this many slanderous insults to our honor and goodness as people, is unbearable.  White men are crippled, disfigured, destroyed by the vitriol thrown our way every day since the day we were born.  We want out.  We want free.  We just want to stop being hurt every single day.  Once we're only among ourselves, these unjustified barbs, these accusations that we're somehow not doing enough for 'minority x,' or 'tribe y,' will naturally disappear.  Like morning dew, like a dream forgotten.  We'll never have to worry about it ever again.

Compose your society of any other building blocks, high IQ Asians and Indians and patriotic blacks and Hispanics and based Gays and Jews -- and I promise you five years from now, ten years from now, or fifty years from now, they'll all be at our throats again, because it's in their nature, and the nature of diversity in general, that the instinctual hatred and resentment of the Other will always eventually take precedence over any well-meaning, high-falutin' principles.

The inferior will always hate the superior simply for their superiority.  So long as white men are the most successful people on Earth (and we always have been, historically, in the present, and we always will be in the future too), we will always be hated by our 'fellow-countrymen' for our precedence in all fields of success.  They will consider us as somehow having deprived them of their birthright, their chance to be at the top, and they will resent us for it.  If only we hadn't been here, they could have been top dog.  And they will hate us for it.  And they will blame us for it.  And they will re-invent all the liberal theories of institutional and systematic oppression that they currently use against us now, because they need those theories to explain their own failures and assuage their own self-esteem.

It's like a law of physics that says that electrons in excited states will eventually emit a photon and return to their normal, lower orbits.  A 'based,' 'patriotic,' 'civic nationalist' black is an unnatural existence, a temporary phenomena, doomed to return to the hate-whitey norm.  If not in that generation, then in their children, or their children, it's just doomed from the start because it's not natural.  It's not natural to be an eternal underdog and never resent your masters and betters.  Everyone wants to be king of the hill, and that will never happen so long as white men exist in your society, because we'll always be the best at everything.

Only when white men and the naturally subservient women who do not have this testosterone filled, king of the hill instinct, are allowed to live together will all friction and hatred disappear, and all the lies blaming us for other people's failings go away.

White nationalism was never thought of, discussed, or proposed until American history was rewritten as a screed against 'fucking white males.'  It's a response to the unmerited, malicious and ridiculous slanders thrown against us and the public and private policy that has followed as a result.  It is a cure to all the unfair accusations and all the unfair actions that have been taken against us ever since, really, the 1860's, but obviously accelerated to an intolerable extent in the 1960's and beyond.  We were fine with the status quo.  It was minorities who rejected that 'let's all get along together' life, and demanded we either die or become their eternal slaves as restitution for all our imagined, non-existent crimes.  We're trying to escape the concentration camp conditions the liberal coalition has set up for 'fucking white males,' and this attempt at escape is called 'hate.'  Escaping is 'white supremacy.'  Escaping is 'trying to gas six million Jews.'  It just makes your head spin.  Trying to escape the same fate as the Jews suffered in Nazi Germany has somehow been twisted into the same moral act as enacting the fate Jews suffered in Nazi Germany.  We aren't the Nazis, we're the freaking Jews, escaping a hateful Europe to found a new nation of Israel, where we can be safe among our own, finally free of hatred once and for all.  There could not be a clearer parallel.  We have suffered, we are hated, we want free, we want our Zion, we want homogeneity back where we'll never be persecuted again -- and yet we're Nazis and Israel is fine.

If the argument is, like the one used against Israel, that anywhere whites try to go to reform in a homogeneous manner would require displacing already existent minority natives, and therefore we can't be allowed to do it, then why is Eastern Europe demonized for not letting in non-white immigrants?  They are an all-white nation that hasn't oppressed anyone to arrive at that situation.  They started off as pure white, and they're still Nazis because they haven't allowed non-whites to move in and take the land from them.  It isn't about the poor non-whites who would have to move (and in Maine or Montana, how many would that even be?  And with just compensation, why would it be so terrible and unforgivable an abomination anyway?), it's about whites being allowed their own safe space anywhere on Earth.  Anywhere on Earth where whites are not genocided or enslaved, any whites who are not currently enacting policies that will ensure their eventual genocide or enslavement, is 'Nazi' under the current definition.  Is this really about making sure folks get to keep their homes and not have to move?  Or is it a little more sinister than that?

Are they really interested in the human rights of Maine minorities, or perhaps they're more interested in persecuting us and making sure we can never, ever get away?  Is diversity about making sure diverse people have human rights, or making sure whites have no human rights?  Is diversity about protecting non-whites or chasing down the last white person?

Did diversity need protecting in Poland, Czechia, or Hungary?  Or perhaps all white nations and only white nations are in need of diversity, and therefore it's unacceptable for the people of Poland to live among themselves, harming no one, disturbing nothing, just maintaining the status quo of 10,000 years.

So excuse me if I doubt the motives behind people who would deny white Americans an ethnostate, no matter how small, on the basis that this would make one black sad because he'd have to move, even after getting paid fully for the inconvenience.

And excuse me if I doubt white Americans would be allowed to form an all-white moon base or Martian settlement or space station, even when it's absolutely certain we wouldn't be disturbing any non-white natives by doing so.  I don't think they actually care about that justification, what they care about is that we would get away, out of their grasp, out of their ability to harm us any further, and that would be unforgivable.  They would ban all-white moon bases on the same justification of 'that's Nazi hate' as they'd ban any place we tried to settle on Earth.  Our right to be among ourselves is itself objectionable, regardless of whether it's to the detriment of anyone else.  Us not being their slaves and whipping boys is already to their detriment, as far as they're concerned.  Just signalling that we don't want to be abused anymore is already 'white supremacy' requiring a boot to the human face forever.

So no, the people full of hate isn't us.  We're full of fear -- we don't want to die and we don't want to be enslaved, and we're fleeing in terror from the dystopian future they have planned for us.  They're the ones full of hate.  They're the ones with endless schemes of retribution, Haiti-style, once they finally achieve final victory over 'fucking white males' and get to do what they really want to do to us once we've lost all political and military power to defend ourselves.  If they had never hated us in the first place, our philosophy of "Hate, bigotry and racism" never would have even come into being, our movement wouldn't exist, and we'd all be living as happy Americans sharing hot dogs with our non-white neighbors over a 4th of July celebration.

Don't blame us for being driven to this level of desperation, blame yourselves.  You left us no choice.

Are White Men Really so Badly Off?:

Liberals like to claim that white nationalists are paranoid, suffering from a persecution complex, and whining about nothing.  Their argument is that white men are only losing their unearned privileges, returning to the mean level of happiness that they should have had all along if they hadn't been exploiting others, and that eventually this lowering will bottom out once everything is fair and equal again, so white men have nothing to fear.

They may even actually believe this.  So long as you believe in fairy tales like IQ isn't genetic, or there are no differences in brain structure between men and women, or other absurd and completely debunked lies, it wouldn't be odd to also believe that a wonderful age of equality will soon be reached, at which point white men will be forgiven for all their previous sins, and we can all get along and sing kumbayah again.

But we in white nationalist circles know this will never happen.  So long as white men are allowed to compete on any meritocratic basis, we will rise to the top over non-whites and women, and then we will be hated for it, and this fair result of competition will be used as yet more evidence of our evil oppression.  We will never be forgiven because we will always be better which means we will always be 'oppressing' and 'exploiting' the innocent non-white-men and therefore we will always be in need of 'correction.'

Conservatives might argue that yes, liberals will always hate us and always be sniping at us from their positions in academia and the media, but we should just let it all slide off us like water off a duck's back, concentrate on making money and getting ahead, ignore all the nonsense and better ourselves and enjoy ourselves.  All their silly resentments are meaningless because they're powerless and it's still possible to succeed in America if you just display some good old fashioned grit.

So again, the claim is that I'm exaggerating the threat and there's no real need for disruptive action, it's better to stay within the system than try to rebuild everything from scratch, which would be like trying to cure a termite infestation with a nuclear bomb instead of just a bit of fumigation which is all that's called for.

But is that working?  Is staying within the system, like the donkey/horse in animal farm, and repeating to ourselves the mantra 'I must work harder,' so that society keeps plugging along despite all the liberal wreckers, really enough to make white men happy in America?

The ticket to success in America is Ivy League admissions.  So how many white men got into Harvard last year?

Half of Harvard went to non-whites last year.  (Which is well above their national average population, so right off the bat we're being discriminated against, even though the average white IQ is well above the average diverse IQ, so it makes no sense that we would be underrepresented.)

Half of Harvard went to women last year.  (Despite the fact that men are on average 5 IQ points smarter than women, so it makes no sense for women to be occupying half of our most elite institutions.)

And out of the 'whites' allowed into Harvard, 50% of those were Jews.  (25% of overall Harvard admissions).

So white men, who make up at least 30% of the population, and are higher IQ than at least 95% of the population, are only 12% of admissions at Harvard.  The rest of the elite college admissions system reflects this same bias.

It's still possible for a few whites here and there to say to themselves, "I must work harder!" and get a nice stock broker job out of Harvard, but it's meaningless advice for the vast majority.  Even if all white men try their hardest, colleges won't accept them on the basis of merit, but are more interested in filling up various diversity quotas, so no matter how hard you work only 12% of white men can fit into this musical chairs game.

I'll tell you what, if the whites who can still graduate from Harvard don't want anything to do with white nationalism, if they're fine with living in the USA and like it here -- more power to them.  They can get rich and live it up in the land that's allowed them to succeed, and the rest of us who had no chance here can try our luck in a different country with different standards, maybe ones where we can succeed too.  We don't need them.  There's way more talent and intelligence in the remaining 88% than the 12% of token whites who were allowed to succeed in  America to give a veneer of fairness to the overall black mass.

Let's look at some other metrics.  Men's wages haven't risen since 1970.  This at a time when productivity has doubled.  It's not just that we aren't rich enough and need more material well-being.  1970's isn't hell.  But it matters very much when your relative status keeps going down.  People's happiness is very much tied into how they feel about themselves and how others treat them, all of which is based on them out-earning the competition.  Most of all, women aren't interested in losers so you can't have the most elementary building block to happiness and success, a wife and children, with 'wages no different since 1970.'

Everyone else's earnings have risen during this time, so our relative status is dropping like a rock, and along with it our prospects for marriage.

White men could be making a lot more in a white nationalist system where their wages weren't undercut by H1-B's, cheap labor mass immigration, women in the workforce, affirmative action, equal opportunity lawsuits, environmental laws, endless regulations, ever-higher-taxes, a 20 trillion dollar debt and hundreds of trillions promised to failed programs like Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and pensions that we will have to pay for in higher taxes in the future, etc, etc, etc.

With that extra earning power would come additional respect and praise and marriageability.  We would be walking with a spring in our steps again.

Now if you're white and you're filthy rich, if you have great job security and everyone calls you 'Herr Professor' and bows as you walk by, maybe white nationalism isn't for you.  You can continue to live it up in diverse, multicultural USA.  For every one of you there's a thousand equally competent whites who might want to try their luck in a new system that doesn't actively try to destroy them.

Now let's talk more about women.  Access to (attractive) women is the key ingredient to success in life.  Are white men content with the sexual marketplace as things stand?  Or would they want to see a few changes under a new, pro-white-male, system?

In 1900 or so, virtually all whites were married, to thin, attractive, young girls (teens or 20's.), who would never cheat on you, who were virgins before marriage, who would honor and obey you, and who would never divorce you.  You could look forward to lots of sex and lots of kids, accompanied by very little griping or nagging.

It sound like something out of Mohammed's descriptions of paradise, it sounds so unreal, but every one of these statements is backed up by statistical, undisputed facts.  This really was what life was like, as surreal as it sounds.  This is what used to be the norm.

Now, matters are worse.  Most men aren't married.  80% of women are fat and unattractive.  When they do marry, they're already well past their prime.  50% of them cheat on you.  50% of them divorce you.  90+% aren't virgins, 90+% don't honor or obey you.  The average amount of sex in a relationship is way, way down even when you supposedly are married, and the law has now changed such that marital rape, a previously inconceivable oxymoron, is now a crime enforceable by law.  Oh, and if you're lucky, you'll have two kids at max.  If you're unlucky your wife will insist on adopting black children from Africa because they're so poor and unfortunate and we need to prove how enlightened we are.  No matter what you do they'll constantly be complaining about all your faults and how much more you should be doing for them.

It's no wonder most men don't marry in a world like this.  There's nothing to be gained from it and everything to lose.  And yet, biologically speaking, the white man's deepest desire and instinct is to marry a women and raise children together with her.  This is what we do.  This is what we're specialized for.  We had the most monogamous, loving and close marriages in the world, historically, it was our pride and our greatest moral ascendancy over the rest of the world.

In Vinland, in a new white nationalist nation, there would be a chance for men to marry like the old days.  Now, at first it may be pretty dismal -- I expect nine men to be eager to form Vinland for every woman -- but what's the use?  Your chances are even worse at a happy marriage in America.  If you're single already, nothing changes.  But more importantly, looking forward, your troubles as a involuntary celibate in Vinland are temporary, whereas in America they're permanent.  The next generation of children raised in Vinland will be back to the normal gender balance, (or if we wanted, we could select for nine women for every man. . .), and these children will be raised in a culture and environment and law code that makes sure men get to enjoy the 1900's married life rather than the current farce.  Perhaps a white nationalist will have to take one for the team and die childless and unattached -- no worse than their fate as a non-white nationalist, but sad nonetheless.  But you know what, in the first case they can take solace in the fact that their kith and kin, their racial brethren, will never have to suffer the same fate they went through.  That they personally put the world back on track and now people very much like them, sharing their same values, same looks, same culture, same language, same morals and same genes, will get to have, forever, moving forward, what America deprived them of.

Untold millions of men have died through the ages, childless and unattached, to protect the tribe.  Brave men throughout our history have made the ultimate sacrifice for a dream of much lesser value.  We're talking about the greatest standard of living increase possible, from hell to heaven, while Washington's boys were fighting over a stamp tax.

Living in a gender unbalanced nation and having to stay single in return for setting things right and getting to lead a virtuous and honest life again is not too much to ask.

If being shut out from all elite, powerful, and prestigious positions, getting lower relative pay than everybody else, and having women treat you like dirt all your life long isn't bad enough, if we should let all that slide off our backs like water and just apply some more 'grit' already, then how about this?

“Across all of these studies, (researchers) found that having a positive sense of identity and feeling proud about your ethnic-racial group led to a host of positive measures,” Yip said.

White men would be a lot better off if they were allowed to feel proud about their identity and race.  Instead we are offered only the exact opposite in America.  We must be made to feel ashamed of ourselves, guilty, penitent, groveling.  Our identity is 'the cancer of human history,' our only identity is 'evil oppressors across all time and space who have ruined everything for everyone else, raping and exploiting and doing atrocities to all the other peoples of the world.'

If you don't think this harms our overall well-being then you're living in la la land or lying.  Not only is it obviously important for people to feel good about themselves, but all scientific studies have already proven this to be true.

Even if it were a lie, even if you had to make it all up, it would be better for whites if they were taught to love themselves and take pride in purely fanciful accomplishments that will make them feel like they can aspire to greatness too.

How much more daemonic is it that we are taught to hate ourselves and be ashamed of ourselves when, in actuality, we are the one group with the greatest claim to human accomplishment in history?  And not just by some small margin.  White men are responsible for virtually everything that exists in the world today.  Everything.  It's all because of us.  We're all progress in all human history.  We have more to be proud about than everyone else combined, times ten.

According to Charles Murray's Human Accomplishment, a meticulously researched study, in the sciences and the arts, 90+% of accomplishment rests squarely on our shoulders.  But even that study falls short of our true contributions to the world.  We did so much more than science and art.  We spread morality to the far corners of the Earth.  We stamped out evil customs, evil traditions, evil empires, and replaced them with the light of truth, kindness, love and goodness.  We freed women from horrid circumstances and made the whole world treat them like human beings.  We stopped awful superstitions like human sacrifice and demanded people enter the enlightenment like we did.

We ended slavery.  No one else.  We didn't invent slavery, we ended it.  It was still endemic all across the Earth before us.  And the way women were treated, they were all slaves back then compared to us.

We ended the caste system, where people through no merit of their own were given all the wealth and women and bounty of the Earth, simply upon birth, and demanded people actually earn their privilege.  No one else did that.  Every native culture had its samurai, Incas, Brahmins, Sultans, etc.  They all had their harems and palaces and other extravagances built on the backs of the poor.  It was we who toppled all the rotten rulers and required everyone to have an equal start at the starting line.

We ended war.  It used to be that life meant walking over to your neighbor's village, stealing their cattle, torturing and mutilating their men to death, and raping their women.  This was just the accepted norm.  For hundreds of thousands of years, this was all life was, the full mental map, in places like North America, Africa, New Guinea, etc.  Islam felt like the whole world belonged to them by divine right and did all the same atrocities in a more systematized and efficient system that was even worse.  But we stopped the Muslims at the gates of Vienna, thanks to Jon Sobieski, we stopped them in the seas thanks to Portugal, we stopped them in France thanks to Charles Martel, and we saved the world from their eternal jihad.  We defanged the monsters all across the world engaged in casual cruelty, slaughter and mayhem for their own personal satisfaction.  We conquered the world, toppled all the local big men, and brought about world peace and the rule of law.

Now the percentage of people who die due to violence is the lowest in human history.  And even after colonialism ended, America always intervened against tyranny and slaughter and for freedom.  We saved the world from the brutality of communism, the newly revived fanaticism of Islam, and stopped all would be conquerors from annexing anyone else's territory with stern reminders of white western strength that was always ready to intervene on behalf of the little guy (see Kuwait.)  We've gone to the far corners of the globe, with nothing to gain for ourselves, just to save others.  In South Sudan, in Syria, in South Korea, with peacekeepers deployed all over the planet.  Even though Afghanistan staged the worst terror attack in history against us, we responded by giving them roads, schools, and an electricity grid while overseeing a gigantic population and economic boom.

We could not have a prouder legacy, philosophically speaking.  Our thoughts on how life and society should be constituted, starting with the Greeks and Romans, all the way through to the Americans, have provided the whole world with a better, happier, more peaceful and successful way of life than the models they had built for themselves.  We have inspired and taught the world.

So okay.  Fact A) Everyone feels better and does better in life when they're proud of their identity and ethnicity/race, are proud of their history and ancestors, and feel like they are destined for great things and their descendants will do well after they die.

Fact B)  Whites in fact can be proud of all of these things, should be proud of all of these things, and should feel that they and their descendants deserve greatness.

Fact C)  Whites are instead ashamed of themselves and feel guilty, hate their ancestors, hate that they're born to their own race and don't feel like they should have any descendants or any success in life, because we're the cancer of human history and why would you want to spread or continue the legacy of a cancer?

Fact D)  Any whites who aren't ashamed of themselves and see through the lies of the Jedi, who have joined the dark side and know the power of the dark side of the force, are nevertheless destroyed all the same, according to a second and separate mechanism:

“In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.”  ― Theodore Dalrymple

White men are destroyed by having to lie, by having to write in various essays that whites are evil and should be ashamed, even when they don't believe it.  The humiliation of having to endorse something you know is evil and untrue breaks you all the same.  And just like how Peter had to deny Jesus over and over at his crucifixion, because people kept asking him over and over, the lies and the humiliation are unending.  Virtually every day you are forced to mouth some pc-shibboleth, lest you be outed and destroyed.  You must deny the truth and endorse an evil lie every day to stay employed, to stay friends, to stay family, to maintain your prestige and honors and endorsements, to have a chance to marry and have kids.

A catch-22 like no other.  Lose yourself, or lose everyone else.

The psychic harm done to white men by this catch-22 is worse than everything else I listed above, all of it combined.  If people can bear with losing their chance at love, marriage, reproduction, decent wages, decent jobs, and everything else, they still can't bear to lose this -- their very souls.  America robs us of our right to truth, honor, and human decency.  We must instead live in a state of constant humiliation.  Worse than any slave, we must even persecute ourselves.

So yes, we are that badly off.  And yes, a radical solution is necessary because the problem is radical.  Maybe not for everybody.  Let's say some fraction of white men are doing great, love their lives, have no problems and want to stay American.  Nobody is stopping them, and I'm not talking to them.  I have no clue who these people might be, but whatever, that's great, congratulations.  But guess what?  It's not like that for everyone, for the rest of us, and we still want to be happy too.  We should have that right.  We should have a chance to pursue our own happiness, just like they've pursued theirs, and we cannot be happy under this regime.  Maybe they can be, but we can't.  We value our souls and the truth too highly, we value honesty and virtue too much, and we want things that we simply cannot have while we still live under this nightmare labyrinth of lies.  The drug overdoses plaguing the white male community speak more eloquently of our despair than anything I can write about or explain.  It should be obvious to anyone that no, things are not all right, we're dropping like flies out there.  It's time for a change.

1 comment:

Unknown said...

Diamed, I'll have to give you a little nudge.

You mention the word 'allow' a lot: "...we can't be allowed to do it...", "...being allowed their own safe space...", "...allowed to form an all-white moon base..."

All I can tell you is that no revolution with real-life consequences has ever been 'allowed' to arise by the existing laws.

When fighting for a good cause, instead of bemoaning the obviously unjust laws, you only worry about the legality of your actions to the extent that law enforcement (official or unofficial) has coercitive power. No more, no less.

I really hope that your lack of action doesn't come from undeserved respect to oppressive laws beyond the extent of their coercitive powers.