If you want to know the truth, the scientific facts, proving races and sexes aren't equal, read Human Diversity by Charles Murray. It has all the most up to date studies showing incontrovertible proof of various group differences. One of which is that there are 3-4 times as many genius men as genius women in the world, which is plenty right there to explain why men are more likely to become president, CEO or win the Nobel prize. No sexism needed, pure merit dictates the result must be this way. Why are there more genius men than genius women in the world? Due to greater male variability, which is an inherent truth of all animal species across the board. Men are more genetically voluble than women and tend to try out all sorts of dangerous new combinations in the hopes of getting ahead and scoring big with lots of women, thus reproducing lots and lots of kids. Women would gain no such advantage even if they were genetically superior, because it takes a lot of time and effort for them to have a kid regardless. This means there's no incentive for women to genetically hit it out of the ballpark -- almost all women reproduce in equal amounts no matter their quality. But for men, if you're cool enough, you could gather a harem of hundreds of women and impregnate them all. Genes are aware of this possibility so they're more than willing to sacrifice the viability of a male specimen on the 1 in a 100 gamble it'll pay off big. Evolution gambles with the male genome because it pays.
So due to this natural difference in reproductive ability, across all animal species, always men are more varied than women, and thus at the top and the bottom more frequently than women. So men will always outperform women in any fair competition that selects for the absolute best in a field. Women can be better on average but they'll never be best.
As for why whites are smarter and more civilized than blacks, it's because they selected for intelligence and orderliness while living in agriculture-based cities for thousands of years, while blacks were still subsistence living in mud huts, never growing beyond the tribe. If a white couldn't get with the system they were hung, like the English did to every last pickpocket in London. Rinse and repeat long enough and you get well behaved men. If a black couldn't get with the system -- well, no worries, there was no system, no one to impose any checks on behavior, and nothing to stop you from hunting and gathering five miles east or west of the group you couldn't get along with.
As farming grows more difficult intelligence rises to compensate -- so further north farming communities who had to do more to succeed bred smarter than further south farming communities who had to do less. Eventually farming becomes so difficult it's impossible, which means there was no city based communal life anymore and you go back to hunter gathering like the Eskimos, and then your intelligence gains fall off again because there's no one enforcing good civilized behavior on men anymore. But all farming communities are smarter than blacks, and for that matter even Eskimos are smarter than blacks, because harsh weather is challenging enough on its own. The more urbanized your community, like with Jews or other middlemen minorities like Armenians, the smarter you become. (Farming made cities possible and thus raised IQ, but farming itself is out in the countryside and does not raise IQ, so the farmers benefited least and the cultures suited to city life the most).
It all makes perfect sense and is obvious when you think about it for five minutes. But we aren't allowed to explain these self-evident truths that everyone in the past knew and talked about as a given -- from the age of the Greeks and Romans, to the Arab Empires, all the way to World War II.
Asians lived in big orderly cities for the longest stretch of time while also living in a northern, inclement climate so they're the smartest race. Notably, the Han Chinese were originally living to the North of China but eventually their greater intelligence allowed them to migrate into China and take it over. The original Chinese were driven south into Vietnam or to the hills and virtually extinguished. The mongols and manchus, in turn, lived to the North of the Han so ended up conquering the Han -- there just weren't enough of them to genetically replace the Han this time around, so eventually control reverted back to the Han again. (The same for the Normans, who are descendants of Vikings, conquering England, but not having enough numbers to turn that into a genetic payoff. But it's always the further north guys conquering the further south guys, even when the relatively southern guys are quite northern themselves.)
The Turks were originally a far northern herding race bordering China and only moved south into Turkey recently. That's why they were able to outcompete the natives. How long you've lived in cities, how urbanized your community was (how big and dense your city actually was), and how far north you were. Those three factors will predict all racial achievement gaps across history. For Africans and Australian Aborigines they get 0's across the board. For Amerindians they either didn't live in cities or were too far South (like Mexico or Peru), but that still got them further than Africans. For Arabs and Indians and Indonesians they lived in cities but were too far south but that's still better than Africa. Then you have the Europeans and Asians who lived in cities in the north and kick ass, but most of whom were still farmers living out in the sticks, so didn't get the full benefit of their situation. Then you have Jews who lived in Northern Cities full time and they rule the world.
Anyway, everyone knows this stuff already. The point is racial and sexual differences are obvious and well known and easily understood. There's no oppression anywhere, all the differences are due to differential evolution due to historical forces beyond anyone's control. It would take thousands of years for blacks to reach the civilizational level of whites because they would have to evolve under the same circumstances we did to do so. It's never going to happen -- especially when we coddle blacks so with welfare.
But we don't live in a natural and just world, like so many brilliant thinkers of the past did, so we aren't allowed to say like Darwin that blacks are a failed evolutionary appendage of the human tree. Our situation is no longer the Enlightenment, it's Rohan.
Intelligent, clear-sighted, honest people like Eomer and Eowyn only suffer for their virtues, and gain nothing from them. Eomer can only say in disgust and bewilderment, "where was Gondor when. . .?" and "look not to hope, for it has abandoned these lands." Eowyn can only powerlessly suffer the privations of the awful Wormtongue because no one will defend her honor and the authorities look the other way. In America this is people like me -- people who understand the scientific nature of human diversity but are silenced and sidelined from all well paying jobs, honors and praise, with the intention and effect of depriving us of any chance at marriage and children because women slavishly respect the people society respects and don't think for themselves where their affection should rest.
Unintelligent, honest people are the suckers and rubes who still think Theoden is king and mindlessly follow his orders even though really they all come from Wormtongue and Sarumon, leading to their own wholesale slaughter. These are the useless propagandized drones who follow the law and pay their taxes but see no benefit from it, can't even replace their numbers they're so hard up for cash, and watch their kids dying of overdoses or transitioning into transexuals at the encouragement of their own government.
Intelligent, dishonest people realize all the same truths about human diversity as I do, but stridently say the opposite in order to get all the plum positions and honors in society. They do nothing but repeat the party line, have no merit or accomplishments in their lives, but still earn millions doing nothing -- except maintaining the tyrannical system which for the ruling powers is plenty. This self-serving parasitical class controls the media, the schools, and the bureaucracy, and perpetuates itself by legally discriminating against anyone who tries to go against them. In Rohan this is Wormtongue and his servants, all of whom work under Sarumon and ultimately Sauron, knowing full well they are pure evil but figuring it's better to share power with the winner than die a loser. Just like Wormtongue and Weinstein and Epstein and Podesta, they're all sick sexual predators and other vile satanic specimens of physical and psychic deformity, but like with Wormtongue everyone pretends not to see it and looks the other way. This is how people like Hillary and Biden still walk freely among us despite all their crimes.
Lastly there's the unintelligent, dishonest people. These are the Uruk-Hai, the Orcs, the Hill Tribesmen who follow Sarumon, etc. They're mindless maggots who just wander across the land destroying everything, capable of bipedal motion and speech and thus unfairly credited as sapient. All they ever do is destroy, they all have criminal records, they go through school never learning anything and menacing their teachers, getting unfairly passed grade to grade by principals demanding teachers look the other way. It's always looking the other way! Theoden kept looking the other way and pretending Orcs weren't even attacking Rohan, even as entire villages were being massacred. Likewise in America, we all look the other way and pretend we aren't being swept under by barbaric criminals, from Muslims to Hispanics to Blacks, even though it's right in front of our faces every day. The dishonest intelligent people like Wormtongue, Sarumon, Hillary and Biden use these orcs as their tools to take total power over the productive sucker classes. In Sarumon's case through bloody intimidation, in America through the democratic vote, but it all amounts to the same. You flood the area with subhumans and take over, pretending the actual productive civilized people don't have a right to their ancestral lands and refusing to defend them.
If the stupid, honest people ever listened to the intelligent, honest people and took up arms against their deceivers and plunderers, together they would be strong enough to repel the invasion and save their realm -- just like Rohan did when Theoden revived. But where is our Gandalf to break the spell cast over the stupids' eyes? How can we possibly get out of this system? There is no outside help for us -- no Legolas, no Aragorn. We just have helpless sidelined powerless victims like Eowyn and the dying villagers who will not, can not organize on their own to their own defense.
If the stupid, honest people would listen to us who know about human diversity, we could transform their lives completely. They would live healthy lives, free of crippling taxation and regulation, everyone would be married with lots of healthy children, education would work like a charm, crime would end full stop, and the masses of foreigners invading our country would be kicked back out or slaughtered, just like the Orcs of Middle Earth. All they have to do is stop believing the system's false sorting method.
Right now people trust the 'experts.' 'Experts' are people who got degrees in fancy places like Harvard. Their only claim to fame is that they were liked by the previous generation of 'experts' who gave them all the honors and awards for repeating the narrative, their only accomplishment in life. Why do people trust these 'experts?' What does a college degree signify? Absolutely nothing, except that you have to be a liar because no one who tells the truth can make it all the way through the system. The whole thing is so phony -- once you're accepted into Harvard it's impossible to flunk out, you automatically graduate with honors. So it isn't what you learned there -- it's what you learned before you got there -- what to say on your entrance essay.
Until these idiots stop respecting all these false honors and awards -- oh this guy won a Pulitzer, he must be special -- no you idiot he's just a liar who lied about the Russia hoax for years, which gained him great approval and honors among the powers that be. There isn't a single honor given out by any powerful group that isn't a mark of shame in this world of today. Remember when they gave Obama the Nobel Peace Prize a month into his term of office as President, before he could have possibly achieved anything at all? Or when they gave Gore a Peace Prize for falsely claiming New York City would be underwater by now due to global warming? These honors are all shit, they only go to liars and criminals, and no one of any worth has any of them.
The same is true of high salaries. If you're earning a lot it's because you're a crook, not because you actually earned it. Every high earner is making money via some crooked rigged system that gives them money way out of proportion to the good they're doing. In business it's all these useless executives who earn 40 times as much as they used to but aren't making any more profits than before. If it's lawyers or doctors it's due to the artificial hurdles of the education system which choke out competition that are just as good at the jobs as the license holders. For example, it's proven that avid video gamers are better at surgeries than surgeons after just a few hours of practice with the surgery machines. It's also proven that AI can diagnose various illnesses better than paid doctors can. For that matter, everywhere else on Earth doctors earn far less but people have better health outcomes than the patients treated by America's doctors. So even doctor to doctor, comparison wise, it makes no sense how much our doctors are paid.
Any distinction or honor anyone has is a mark of the devil. It only means you're evil. You traded your soul in for material gain. Anyone can do that. Anyone who doesn't value their soul, that is.
The only exception is professional athletes, who actually earn their excellence and compete on a level playing field with only performance being measured in scientifically observable ways. I congratulate them on their millions. Artists? No. Even if you're a great seller, that proves nothing except that people are starved for good entertainment and will buy anything. Since all art is filtered by biased publishers and editors ruled by the powers that be who care more about maintaining the narrative than good storytelling, you're never competing against true titans, just other dwarfs like you.
Look how high selling crap like Twilight and Hunger Games were. Or if you prefer 50 Shades of Gray. You can sell a lot and be total crap in this world because nothing else is on offer. Furthermore, after decades of brainwashing in the schools and the media, a story that goes against the narrative will cause cognitive dissonance and stress in the public and obviously won't be popular. So even if a story is objectively good, because you've brainwashed people against it for decades they'll subjectively dislike it. If for decades a different message had been taught in school and on tv, then a different message would sell. Artists taking advantage of prior brainwashing by lying to their customers even more aren't estimable. They're parasites living off a decaying host.
It's like Black Panther. The movie was crap, and China instantly recognized this and dropped it, because they hadn't been brainwashed for decades to slavishly worship blacks. But America ate it up like a dog to its vomit, they couldn't get enough of it, lavishing billions of dollars and endless rewards on it. Almost all the money Black Panther made came from the captive audience of America. It was a movie built to perfectly match the propaganda. The same for the billions from The Force Awakens. Girl Power and Black Power aplenty, America loved it -- China didn't. If you brainwash the public for enough decades even really crappy art that matches the narrative starts to look good.
The real titans of industry who made modern computing possible were a bunch of racists -- Shockley and Terman and all the rest. Future generations didn't invent anything special, just dumb apps like Facebook. We're still living off the derivative inventions of intelligent honest people of the deep past. There are no intelligent, honest scientists left -- they're all blowing up fake hoax crisis to secure funding like covid-19 and global warming. Which is why there are no breakthroughs anymore. Which is why we still can't get back to the moon, even though it was possible 50 years ago. It takes intelligence and honesty to advance science -- like Watson had. You can't do it with a bunch of narrative bootlickers.
Elon Musk is a comparatively honest man who called Covid-19 out as a hoax. Go figure, SpaceX is light years ahead of the competition. But even SpaceX and Tesla are nothing compared to where we should be on the technological scale. Look at where Heinlein and Asimov thought we would be by now, and that's where we'd be, if actual honest scientists were in control. If Nazis had won World war II.
How were all our institutions captured by dishonest people in the first place? Gradually. At first you had a few blowhards who seemed like a good addition to the university just for diversity's sake. Their theories had been untested so it wasn't like it was dishonest to argue their viewpoint, heck, maybe they were right. Then they started organizing, hiring only like-thinkers, praising only like-thinkers, and their tribe grew. While the old guard played by the rules of merit and didn't favor their own ideology, the new upstarts cared nothing for merit or achievements and rewarded only fellow travelers. In such a rigged system it became easier and easier to make professor as a liberal than as a conservative. By the time all their dumb theories had been disproven by scientific, statistical, genetic data, it was too late. By then all the institutions were ruled solely by dishonest liberals who rewarded their own and excluded everyone else. They could care less what the studies prove. Now it's impossible to get any distinguished position unless you agree with them about everything.
How did the bolsheviks take over Russia even though they were an ideological minority? Because they ruthlessly favored their own and were willing to lie, cheat, and kill anyone else. They were organized in their dishonesty, while all the other parliamentary factions were actually deluded into the idea that they were installing a fair and free democracy, trying to deal honestly between allies and enemies alike. Absolute rubes. It's suckers all the way down.
No comments:
Post a Comment