https://www.zerohedge.com/political/media-wants-know-why-men-are-walking-away-liberal-society
'Recent surveys paint what might seem like an apocalyptic picture: In the US, around 45% of men ages 18-25 do not approach women anymore to engage in dating or relationships. Over 42% of all men have no interest in seeking out women for relationships or casual dates. Around 30% of men over 40 years old have never been married and are not necessarily seeking marriage.'
It's impossible to shame men who don't want to deal with modern women anymore. We are too many. We are almost the majority. Aside from rock stars and celebrities and professional athletes and the like who might actually get a decent girl, the majority of men who don't fit that category have quit. They have quit trying for the booby prize that is boobs. What a glorious moment. I've moved from the extreme to the mainstream, and all by just sitting and waiting while enjoying various hobbies.
Women have overplayed their hand. They thought they were all-powerful and could demand everything for nothing, forever. That being hot and having a womb was sufficient for men to crawl through hallways of broken glass for. They thought democracy and being the majority was sufficient to rule mankind. It doesn't work that way. At any time we can go on strike. Like Atlas Shrugged, men have collectively given up and quit. You want the world? Fine, it's yours. Do as thou wilt with it. We'll be over here enjoying our virtual reality on computers. See how far the world gets you without men in it.
Except we already know how women fare without men in their lives. They're all anxious, depressed, and on various drugs. It's so beautiful. While men enjoy their time away from women, women go literally insane and seek clinical help when they're away from men. Conservative women, married women with children, don't have mental health problems. It's the women who kept blaming men for everything who are going crazy for lack of men. Hoist on their own petard!
Women are hypergamous. They're only attracted to that thin top 5% of men who have made a name for themselves in the world. Rich, successful, famous, powerful men. That's all they want. Breadwinners and engaging personalities are not wanted or needed. Fathers aren't wanted or needed. If you aren't Superman you're nobody. This has been true since the dawn of time and isn't women's fault -- it's engraved into their genes of attraction, like men are attracted to women who display signs of fertility. It was set up by evolution so that eugenics would be practiced across time. Only the best men have children, so children are on average better than the generation that preceded them, eon after eon. It's that hypergamous selectiveness that has gotten us out of caves and into space.
What has changed is that men are no longer fruitlessly wasting their lives and emotions on women they'll never get. For decades men have been trying, fruitlessly, to win over women's approval by working harder, being nicer, doing more chores, acceding to ever more liberal politics, getting higher and higher education degrees, denaturing and enslaving themselves, doing whatever they were told would win women's approval. But the truth is women approve of winners, and for every winner in a contest there are multiple losers. Men can't check off a bunch of boxes and become attractive to women, because it's all relative. If all men try harder at once, the relative position doesn't change at all. Men work their butts off and get no more women than before.
Men who previously put all their time and energy into getting a woman, only to lose her later to divorce, are left completely shattered. Heartbroken, bankrupt, incapable of ever trusting another human being again. These are the men who resort to drugs, alcohol and suicide. Men who never bothered to get a girl in the first place maintain their emotional equilibrium. These 45% of 18-25 year olds aren't going to be depressed to the point of suicide because they don't have a girl. They didn't waste their lives trying to get one, they filled up that void with things they could rely upon instead. And they will always have that thing they can rely upon to maintain their emotional equilibrium moving forward. They will never suffer like the men who tried.
My advice to men is if you see a path towards success in a field that's interesting enough you can imagine a story being written about it, then take that path. Focus on the success, not on girls. Once you're successful girls will start flocking to you and you can choose whomever of them that suits you best. If you don't think your life merits a story, then relax and enjoy other people's stories instead of your own. No woman will pay any attention to you no matter how desperately you court them or try to build up your credentials, so you may as well give up at the starting line.
If you look at my hall of fame entries, the stories humans are interested in, and thus the people humans are interested in, are all exceptional. They're either exceptionally talented, exceptionally moral, or exceptionally immoral. They're interesting because they're exceptional. Women are exactly like fans. We want to read about exceptional, interesting people living big dreams we could never dream of. Women want to marry the men we want to read about. They're the same as us, so there's no point resenting it.
In Hikaru no Go, thousands of people compete to become pros, but only three pass per year. Voice acting gigs are even more selective. The number of girls who take voice acting lessons, versus the number who can make a living off of voice acting, is thousands to one. And then you move up to stuff like Inori from Medalist, who wants to become a women's individual figure skating gold medalist. The number of girls who figure skate versus the number of gold medalists is millions to one. My point is, nobody cares about the dreary lives of all the losers in these contests. But being a loser at becoming a storybook character like Achilles does not make you a loser at life. A loser at life is someone who's unhappy. So long as you're happy you're winning at what matters.
And no, a loser at life is not someone who fails to reproduce themselves. If that were the case ants would be the greatest lifeform on Earth. There are quadrillions of them. We are superior to ants and don't have to compete with them on the same plane as equals, breeding versus breeding. We have the unique trait of sapience, so to win as a human being is to make use of that sapience, not outbreed ants. The person who utilizes his mind best with the time he is given is the winner at life. Leave the breeding wars to vermin whose minds can only encompass breeding as the purpose of life. Those with souls should pursue spiritual rewards.