It's the Jews, Stupid!

http://cofcc.org/?p=5715

Everyone should check out this excellent post at the Council of Conservative Citizens website.

Both videos are short and sharp at making their points.

I'm not convinced that a low fertility rate is particularly bad. The black plague killed off 1/3 of Europeans, but the population quickly rebounded, because population is tied to food production (and more recently energy + food production), not the amount of child bearing age women. Women can have 13 children a piece if they wanted, it doesn't matter if whites are reduced to a tiny scattering of a few million, we could rebound to billions soon enough. The bottleneck is not the ability to reproduce, it is and always has been the wealth to support said children.

So long as we keep control of our government and territory, all of our wealth will belong to us. This wealth can translate into bundles of bright bubbly babies whenever we want. If we lose control of our government, all our wealth will be diverted to our new ruling class -- if we lose control of territory, its natural resources will be exploited to the benefit of others. Those are the two permanent threats to white population levels. Once you lose these things, your population is permanently reduced, not temporarily, because the wealth can never be retrieved.

The presence of minorities presents no threat to the wealth of the majority so long as they don't seize our territory or government. This is why people largely see no harm in tolerating minorities and think we are jumping at shadows and crying wolf. The problem is minorities tend to cluster into ghettos where they form the majority. At this point, they seize control of the local government and the local territory, and drive all the whites out by crime, unjust tax policies, or simply dirty looks and an inability to find friends or lovers. If every single black, hispanic, or muslim minority were distributed evenly across the country, to be a harmless 20% block in every neighborhood, they really could be seen as some sort of diverse colorful vibrant enrichment of the otherwise pasty bland routine. When they become 60, 70, or 90% of the population, the calculation shifts violently to a desperate fight for survival, ala Zimbabwe or South Africa. What a quick transition this can be! One decade all your diverse friends and neighbors are as cute as buttons and harmless as kitty cats -- the next decade they are rioting, raping, and voting in a communist party that seizes all your land and income. What happened? I thought we were such great friends! I'll tell you what happened -- the one law of diversity politics is "Who? Whom?" Minorities know they have to bide their moment when they are still in the minority -- they have no such fear when they're the majority. There's another phrase for this situation: Power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely.

Well meaning immigrants who just wanted to integrate and assimilate into white societies, do so because it is a fait accompli that they cannot get a better deal. However, when it's obvious that this difficult and slow progress could be substituted by simply seizing the money of a conquered and enslaved producer class, their eyes brighten up and they discard their old morality for the new and better one. Sure, they were fine with the old way, but nothing could convince them to stick to it, when the new prospect opens up to them. As a majority with total power, things start to look very different from the past. Why should I have to be the garbage man and live in the small house? Why should I have to learn their language? Why should I have to practice their religion or respect their beliefs? I'm the one in power here, this is now my country, why doesn't it adapt to me? Why don't whites assimilate to us, the majority?

Therefore, many things change when the scales tip and non-whites gain control of a territory or a white government. Not only the relative power of the two tribes, and their access to the wealth of the country, but the attitudes of the two tribes as well change just as quickly. Previously neighborly, friendly minorities become power hungry, corrupt, atavistic and vicious. Previously tolerant, de-racinated and charitable whites wise up and become stingy, fearful, and extremely race-conscious. A microcosm of this could be seen in the hurricane katrina disaster, where the superdome included bands of whites manning barricades of thrown up junk and protecting the women inside with the men keeping watch night and day surrounded by surly and hateful seas of blacks intent on their murder the moment they thought they could get away with it. Just previous to this hurricane, the same whites were tourists, more or less safe and enjoying themselves, and the blacks were simple townsfolk, going about their work. The attitudes of a race's members change drastically based on the authority structure, on the government that arbitrates between the groups -- it is not a safe thing to rely on, it is not a constant.

Of course, this is not to say that the presence of even one black isn't harmful to whites -- it is. The point is the additive cost of each malthusian place holder mouth to feed (that negates the extra white mouth that could have lived there instead) is minor compared to the threshold cost of losing control of one's territory or government. A great nation can abide a great deal of ruin. In fact, we can even take a little pride in being so rich, so powerful, that even when we throw half of our money away to complete waste and patronize millions of parasitic minorities who have done nothing but hurt us, we end up being the superpower of the world. What a nation cannot abide is the endgame, that last decade where everything is overturned all at once, and suddenly we have nothing left and no future save extinction. South Africa was also once a majority white country. South Africa also took pride in all the good it was doing for the blacks, despite their stupidity and inability to contribute to the greater good. There's no reason why anyone else has to make the same mistake twice. The experiment has already been performed, the results are already in -- we cannot allow such a thing to happen anywhere else.

Unfortunately for Americans, one race is such a good chameleon, that it took power without our even noticing. These white on the outside, non-white in the inside jews already control our government and have since Roosevelt's time. Currently, half the rich people in America are jews. They control the government through a shadowy matrix of campaign contributions, policy think tanks, media editorials, social science proffessors, lobbyists, voters, etc. They account for half of the US's billionaires. They have special protected statuses that denotes the nobility of all time periods -- a commoner cannot insult an aristocrat, but an aristocrat is free to insult a commoner. Political Correctness is just a new term for the same old pecking order. When you look at who is the least insultable in the United States, the answer is obvious to everyone -- jews. The Holocaust memorial was built in our capital before we ever had a memorial to our own troops who died in WWII. What could be a more obvious feature of an occupied government? America had nothing to do with the Holocaust, nor are any of the american jews here victims of the holocaust. We lost 300,000 white American lives in WWII, and yet the first thing we do is build a memorial to European jews who died during the war. How does that make any sense from a white perspective? But of course, if America is a jewish country, it makes perfect sense to mourn the only dead that matter, other jews. Now our schools go about teaching every 5 year old and up the horrors of the holocaust, an event American whites did not participate in, nor were victims of. Why? From our perspective, we should either be taught about the people who victimized us, or whom we victimized, as those are the only subjects relevant to our nation's future behavior.

At the very least, we should be taught of foreign atrocities by their order of magnitude. Therefore before learning of the Holocaust on any 'objective merit,' we should first have covered the reign of Mao, Stalin, Lenin, Genghis Khan, the Aztecs, the Thirty Years War, the Muslim conquests of India, and Imperial Japan's slaughters starting from 1930 up until the day we stopped them. All of these atrocities were larger than the Holocaust on the scale of numbers and suffering, so why not teach our five year olds about them? The answer is obvious, it was never about the objective evil of the Holocaust that we must ward our children against, it was always about the subjective suffering of the Chosen people, the ones who run our government and call the shots. They were most interested in memorializing their dead and making our children worship and pity them in every way possible, to ensure their eternal power and control over us, than cataloging anything to do with white history, or an objective tally of world history's crimes. There could not be any better evidence of who exactly controls America than what is taught to our kids as being of relevance and importance from the past. As George Orwell said: He who controls the present, controls the past. He who controls the past, controls the future. Dethrone the jews, and the next thing we can do is tear down all their Holocaust museums, just like the hateful statues of Saddam Hussein the Iraqis got to tear down. They are a symbol of our conquest and the tyranny of the jewish dictatorship whose sole goal has been our enslavement and destruction. Then we can erase the entire Holocaust literature from our schools, and never let our children hear a damn word about it, except in passing or as some irrelevant footnote to true white concerns. What a liberating feeling that will be! In place of the DC Holocaust Museum, we could build a museum to white victims of world jewry. It could start with Egypt and Babylon and just move all the way up to the present day, with the passage of the 1965 Immigration act, all the victims of black crime since the civil rights act could be written on a black marble wall next to our Vietnam wall, ah the joy in sending all our children on pilgramages to DC to get an education about evil jews who persecuted and murdered us for decades, centuries, even millenia. The mirror opposite of the narrative told today!

Because of jews, we were forced into WWI and WWII -- despite popular sentiment both times being completely against going to war. The first time, jews used their media, financial, and political ties to convince Wilson and the US populace to send us to war to support jewish interests -- namely Britain's Balfour declaration and the defeat of the Ottoman Empire and freeing up of Palestine for jewish settlement. They trumped up complete lies about Germany to stir up sympathy for war -- the staged Lusitania disaster, the lying zimmerman telegram claiming Germany had plans to invade America through Mexico, etc. The second world war was the same. Hitler tried to avoid war with the United States at all cost, even though the jewish-influenced (his top counselor for instance was Morgenthau) Roosevelt was pushing for war through any means possible, even ordering the US navy to fire on any and all German ships they encountered. Even so, most people were against the war until Pearl Harbor, another artificially provoked event we could've avoided if not for our aggressive foreign policy against Japan.

Jews lobbied for and led the 1965 immigration act through congress. The final bill was the Hart-Cellar act, one of whom was a jew. If not for them, there would be no hispanics in this country -- now they have overtaken two of our states and eventually will take over the whole country. Everywhere they inhabit ruin follows, because they are biologically inferior and culturally completely alien -- something that suits jews just fine, who love the policy of divide and conquer and thrive on the new votes that support their spidery hold on the majority populace.

Jews were half the 'freedom riders' who went south to end segregation in all the marches with the communist fraud MLK. It was a jewish speech writer who coached everything MLK said in public, including his I have a Dream speech. Jews founded and ran the NAACP, blacks were just a figurehead for the movement. All the crime that has followed, all the bussing of white school children to minority districts where they are bullied, abused, and cannot be taught anything in failed public schools, is the fault of jews.

Jews have run the federal reserve for decades, they completely control the monetary policy of the United States. Aside from the inflationary pressure this has placed on our economy as a standard course, the egregious current waste of trillions in stimulus and bailouts is all going from jews, to jews, in an incestuous relationship between banks and government -- private jews and public jews -- or in other words crony capitalism. They've stolen more money from white taxpayers in a few months than the combined cost of black crime in the last fifty years. Just wrap your heads around that. It's hard to fathom, isn't it?

My point is this: The true harm caused by minorities is not their malthusian base resource cost, their placeholder cost that denies that space and wealth going to a new white child. If that were so, jews would be the least harmful minority in America, a tiny, innocuous, and harmless handful of enrichers. Instead they are the most harmful minority in America, the source of all our other woes, the misfortune of the world; and it's all because they have already achieved the dream that blacks and hispanics and muslims currently only dream of -- control of our territory and government. If whites had control of our own territory and government, we could swiftly and efficiently deal with the woes all our other minorities cause. They would be utterly harmless, we could even afford to keep every one of them in our country and bloodsucking away at our flanks, due to our sheer size and majesty. Whites are hurt more by jews than all the other races combined -- and we always have been. More whites were killed by the bolshevik jews than all the blacks, Indians, and muslims combined ever managed. It's horrifying what they did to Russia. It can never be forgiven. Never.

Eventually, someday, hispanics, blacks, muslims, or asians could present a threat as grave to whites as jews ALREADY CONSTITUTE. IE, those races might someday be numerous and influential enough to seize our government and territory. Even South Africa did not manage to do this without the help of jews -- the founders and behind the scenes runners of the ANC. But Haiti, at least, does represent a pure transition of white to black rule. As such, we must of course guard against the dangers of muslim/black/hispanic/asian takeover. We cannot allow them to control our government (heck, it would be better if they had no say in it at all), or populate a territory so heavily that they become the government of that region, and exploit its economic worth for themselves. California is a basket case due to just this sort of transition. But it's all rather elementary, when we've already lost control of our government and territory to jews. It's like closing the barn door after the horse has already bolted. Let's admit it, we haven't had a white America for practically a century; everything has been designed for the benefit of the jews, nothing for our own benefit. Henry Ford was pointing this out 80 years ago, it was already so virulent even then! It's hardly improved since, in fact, their hold has only become more permanent, more established, more unchallengeable, more unquestionable, with each passing year. If we want to free America and regain our sovereignty and territory, it can only be freed, and retrieved, from its current owners. It's kind of hard to ward against alien invasion when it's already occurred. The british may as well marshal their arms today and range out on the beaches to stop the normans from crossing the channel. First we must throw out our current alien invader overlords, our current usurpers and tyrants, before we have any chance at warding off future aliens, invaders, overlords and tyrants. Barack Obama is entirely the product of our jewish minders, just like the NAACP, the entire presidency is a figurehead, a front, with jewish power underneath. There's no possibility this is wrong, the jews even admit to it --

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1037029.html

Once jews are thrown out of government, they would become as harmless as any other minority -- a nuisance, but nothing more. In fact, due to their small numbers, they would become the most harmless group in America. We could be as benevolent and merciful to them as we wished, with no threat to our own safety. After all, once we recognize the jews for who they are and take steps to ensure our government belongs exclusively to ourselves from here on, what can they do? Their entire power lay in their chameleon like nature, their white skins that hid as members of the majority while always siding with other minorities. Naming the jew is the same as robbing it of its magic powers. Like cockroaches they cannot stand the light of day. If we want to save America without hurting anyone, it's still possible. Dethrone the jew, undo all the anti-white policies that jews implemented that make us vulnerable to subsequent infections (in the classic AIDS-TB process), and watch your children play in the rolling green fields of our beautiful 50 states. The one thing you cannot achieve, is saving America without ever confronting the jews. That would be as hilarious as launching a revolution without unseating the current government or disobeying any of its orders. The status quo is jewish rule, jews want the status quo to continue, this is the ideal world jews have crafted for themselves. To change the status quo, to remake the world, to put in new rulers, the interests you'll always conflict with, the people always barring your way, will be said jews. How can it be otherwise? It would be like Jupiter trying to become ruler of the gods, without ever confronting his father Chronos, who attempted to eat him and all his siblings to keep him down! Or Luke trying to become a jedi, without ever facing Darth Vader. It's not possible, it's not going to happen. We are doomed to this confrontation, by the nature of reality. Politeness, good wishes, or squeamish fear, cannot stop the inevitable. The war is, and always has been, for the last two thousand years, with the jews, the only minority that has ever threatened the west. No one else has mattered, and no one else matters now. It's the jews, stupid!

The jews are our misfortune! The rest is just details.

p.s. : Be sure to listen to this youtube Saga song, really, it's great and with 1300 comments, it's wonderful to know how many people have rallied to the cause. We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. Look how many people signed off with 14 in their comments! It's heart warming.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKDe-09EpNM&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fcofcc.org%2F%3Fp%3D5715&feature=player_embedded

p.p.s: I'm going on vacation for a couple weeks. I'm not giving up. The fire burns bright and true. So don't worry just cuz I'm not posting~

Obama's Insane Policies:

Politics isn't a very interesting topic, because so little ever happens in politics, and yet so much is written about it in a day to day manner. There's not a dime's worth of difference between the two parties, and therefore arguing against one or for the other is a complete waste of time. Philosophy is much more interesting, and I prefer to stick to larger ideas without mentioning politicians or the current debates going on in the media. Quite simply, everything the media says is controlled by the enemy, and therefore no topic worth mentioning ever occurs in that arena. If the media is even discussing an issue, you can be sure it is essentially irrelevant and meaningless -- attention will never be given to the issues that matter.

However, even I am taken aback by Obama's agenda for America. It's rare for a politician to attempt to destroy America in so many ways, so quickly, that the bills start colliding and interfering with each other. Any one of these bills, if they pass, will cripple our economy. Assuming they all pass together, I have no idea how we the people would cope. The economy is already approaching the same levels as the Great Depression from the 1930's. Any other president would be intent on saving our economy, strengthening our capitalist underpinnings, restoring the dollar and getting Americans jobs. Not Obama, he doesn't give a damn that we are currently in a Great Depression. Instead, he's determined to push hyper-marxist laws that America has rejected over and over again, and still disapproves of in every poll, that will only compound our problems and extend our misery for decades to come. That is, if we ever recover. It's rare that even a single bill or idea this disastrous is pushed in Congress, but Obama has at least five on the table he's pushing simultaneously! George W. Bush has to have been our worst president of all time -- but at this rate, it won't take long for Obama to surpass him.

First, Obama has done nothing about George Bush's wars. We are spending as much or more on these fruitless, evil wars as we were before Obama got elected. This is all the more angering because while Obama was campaigning, this is the one thing he was ever right about -- the one advantage we would gain by electing Obama over McCain. In fact, it appears Obama intends to increase the military's budget. It's still an even guess whether he intends to go to war with Iran. If we did, the price of oil would again shoot up, our military budget would devour yet more tax dollars, more young men would die for no reason, and America would become more vulnerable, not less, to terrorist reprisals.

Second, Obama has called for the strengthening of the community re-investment act, rather than its dismantling. The entire real estate bubble was caused by loans given to 4 states: Nevada, Arizona, Florida, and California. It is almost exclusively due to hispanics taking loans they couldn't repay, and banks having to swallow the losses thereby incurred. America has lost trillions of dollars due to the reckless spending habits of minorities who couldn't possibly qualify under fair terms for their housing loans. What does Obama plan to do about this? Stop the bleeding? Stop making loans to minorities? Put in stricter standards to make sure anyone who takes out a loan for a house, can actually afford to repay the loan? NO, of course not. He plans to pump yet more money into minority neighborhoods, give even more free houses away, and let banks stomach yet more losses in an ever expanding cycle. There is no way we can possibly recover from this housing depression until we stop repeating the same mistakes that got us here in the first place. Can someone please tell Obama the statistics on the racial breakdown of mortgage defaults in this country? Apparently he hasn't caught the memo.

Obama's health care plan is another vile concoction. There is only one way to give everyone in America decent health care -- restrict it to cases unrelated to old age or bad behavior. If we were to do that, we could slash health costs to a bare minimum and cover every American out of the public purse. However, resorting to the taxpayer to accomplish the impossible has an unlimited financial cost. We cannot give all old people all the health care they need until they are 'healthy' again, because there is no god damned cure for old age. We cannot make people who smoke, overeat, drink, sleep around and take drugs as healthy as people who diet and exercise while refraining from sin. People who poison themselves have no right to be supported by anyone else! The cost of irresponsibility, if transferred to others, allows it to expand indefinitely. It is a moral hazard on the grandest scale. This health care bill simply shanghais healthy people to subsidize sick people at no gain to themselves. The current estimate for this new boondoggle is a trillion dollars, but of course that's just the beginning. What about illegal aliens who will flood in for the now free health care benefits? What about people living less healthily since they now don't have to pay for the consequences? What about the automatic ballooning nature of government that oversaw the same growth in Social Security and Medicare we were told would never happen when they were implemented?

Now let's look at 'Cap and Trade.' In short, Obama wants us to return to the pre-industrial age. That's all well and good, but does he intend to return to the population levels of that period as well? Something like 1% of all energy generated in America comes from solar and wind. There is no way it could possibly fuel a modern economy or provide for the needs of 300 million Americans. Either we continue to use coal, oil, and natural gas, or we starve to death, freeze to death, and otherwise die until our population is back to the USA of 1700 or so. Most notably, none of Obama's energy plans include new nuclear plants. If we ever did want to get rid of fossil fuels, the simple solution would be to switch to nuclear power. But that isn't Obama's goal. Obama's goal is to eliminate all sources of energy, to simply turn out the lights on America.

Here is a quote: http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/19/obama-lets-eat-less-so-that-we-can-lead-by-example-on-climate-change-by-eating-less/ “We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times … and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK,” Obama said.

“That’s not leadership. That’s not going to happen,” he added.

Obama literally wants us to starve to death -- that's his energy plan. "We can no longer eat as much as we want." What a far cry this is from the original Marxism, that promised: "Peace, Land, and Bread!" Now we are offered hunger, freezing temperatures, and the end of the automobile as our bright new dawn under our Red-Green overlords.

Cap and Trade is currently another trillion dollar useless program that will not in any way prevent global warming or stop carbon dioxide emissions from entering the atmosphere. There will be zero, zero, ZERO impact on the Earth's temperature from this bill passing. The only people who benefit are corrupt insiders who stand to gain from the new arcane system of 'carbon credits,' and the government tax dollars they'll find ways to spend on completely different agendas. Even scientists agree that nothing we do will have the slightest impact on global warming, because it is all too little too late. We are locked in to a gradual warming of the earth due to heightened carbon emissions for the next century at least. If we want to cure our climate woes, all we can do is invest in technological solutions, such as fusion power, cheap solar power, atmospheric carbon retrieval programs or giant lampshades to cover the earth. Crippling our economy, removing our very ability to live and work in a technological, energy-intensive age, will only ensure our helplessness at facing these issues.

Of course this isn't nearly enough for Obama. Obama also wants to pass an amnesty for all the illegals in America. The moment an amnesty is passed, 20 million more poor, stupid people will be eligible for all sorts of government benefits. Welfare, health care, education, social security, you name it, they'll get it. Immigrants are net tax consumers, not producers. This is why California has gone bankrupt. It isn't rocket science to realize what a plague these hispanics are upon the land. Even so, Obama wants to give them all citizenship, encourage yet more hispanics to come, and lavish all of them with tons of new benefits courtesy of American tax payers. The cost of illegals and their broods of children, and grandchildren, and great-grandchildren, will continue to be paid by Americans for all time. Once amnestied, there will be no way to deport these invaders save civil war. The results will be higher crime and lower standards of living for the remainder of American history. There is no economic sense behind amnestying these illiterate high school dropout non-english speaking drug dealing gang banging schweinhunds.

The reason is not economic, it's pure hatred. Obama wants to genocide the native white inhabitants of America and replace them with more 'people of color' like himself. He hates us and wants us dead and gone, swept away by a wave of fellow thugs and idiots like his own race. He can identify with them, he can't with us, and therefore we must go and they must stay. In a time of great depression, where real unemployment is already 16%, allowing a massive influx of new immigrant workers into the country is pure insanity. How are people supposed to get jobs when there is a glut of labor in the market? How are the poor supposed to get a living wage when there is an infinite supply of scab workers ready and willing to invade America and work for less? How dare Obama pass an amnesty of illegal workers on us during a time of record unemployment? How dare a single immigrant be allowed into this country while our own people cannot find jobs and are living in tents as we speak? It makes me want to cry. We don't have to read the Grapes of Wrath to feel compassion for the poor anymore -- the stories are all around us, here and now. Only pure hatred could animate Obama's push for amnesty in the midst of this pain.

That's not all, folks! There's more! In 2010, just a year from now, George W. Bush's tax cuts are slated to 'phase out.' At the time, they represented welcome relief and spurred our economy to steady growth even in a time of war and terrorist attacks. However, as the years went by, 'tax freedom day' continued to revert to where it had been before the Bush tax cuts had been passed. This is because state and local governments, seeing that people had less federal taxes, simply increased their own taxes to make up the difference. Now, if all the Bush tax cuts were phased out to nothing like they are slated to, it would represent a gigantic tax INCREASE on all Americans. It would not be reverting to the tax burden of 2001, it would be reverting to a tax burden never before seen in American history. It's common knowledge that increasing taxes hurts the economy, whereas cutting taxes always helps the economy. Sometimes it makes sense to hurt the economy for the sake of some greater good. If for instance, we can afford to hurt the economy, because it's roaring along swimmingly anyway, and we'd like to partake in some form of social justice, cold war, or space race -- then fine increase taxes. In the midst of a Great Depression however, where the only thing we can possibly be focused on is getting the economy back on its feet, a tax hike is suicide. The bush tax cuts saved us trillions -- the corresponding restoration will be a tax hike of trillions, all in a time where no one can afford their current bills. Taxes depress business activity because it is harder to make profits, and thus less worthwhile to make any investments. Fewer people will be hired, and the depression will drag on indefinitely, while the government wastes all the money it stole from us on worthless boondoggles like wars in the middle east, cap and trade, or universal unlimited health care -- that no one wants and nobody can afford.

Under Obama, our economy is doomed. If a new congress isn't elected in 2010 that can stop all these horrendous bills from passing, irreparable harm will afflict America for generations to come. Obama hasn't done a single thing right since his presidency began. I hate his foreign policy. I hate his domestic policy. I hate his stimulus package. I hate his automobile takeovers. I hate his trillion dollar deficit spending. I hate his pledge to donate billions to foreign aid at a time when Americans are suffering in our very midst. I hate that he won't reveal his birth certificate and verify he's even a natural born American citizen. I hate his appointment of Sotomayor, a sexist racist intellectual lightweight who doesn't deserve to shine Frank Ricci's shoes. I hate his hate speech laws that are yet another attempt to stifle the 1st Amendment's right to free speech in this last and only free country on earth. I hate his appointment of a black attorney general who says we are 'cowards' for not discussing race. I hate his appointment of a black head of NASA, some monkey man running the most technological and sophisticated science industry in the world. I hate his wife who has 'never been proud of America.' I hate that he won't salute the American flag when the star spangled banner is playing. I hate his race-traitor coal slumming whore of a mother. I hate his alcoholic marxist kenyan father. I hate his muslim stepfather. I hate his Trinity Church 'mentor', Reverand Wright, who preached "God Damn America!" and said whites are responsible for the AIDS virus spreading like wildfire among a black community too fucking ape-like to keep their genitals to themselves. I hate that his political career was launched by a Marxist terrorist, Ayers, who has murdered Americans and committed treason in the hopes of ushering in a new Bolshevik age of terror into the land of the free. I hate that his primary campaign contributor was Goldman Sachs, a jewish fraud institute that rakes in billions through non-transparent means while all the other banks around them go under. I hate this man, this president, who has done more harm to America in the last six months than Bush did in the last six years.

I hope all his bills pass. I hope he's re-elected. I hope in his next term, he comes up with 10 new amazing bills just as bad as these, and they all pass too. I hope Obama gets a third and a fourth term, hell, I hope Obama revokes the entire constitution and becomes dictator for life. Anything to wake up the idiot masses of America! Anything to break free of this horrible fantasy of a post-racial, multicultural, rainbow love society. Anything, any amount of suffering, if this can at least be the bottom of the well, the limit to our tolerance, and the beginning of the resistance that must form, sooner or later, if the white race is to survive in our own country our ancestors fought and died for. Roll on, Obama! Roll on, Communism! Roll on, the new dark age!

Once the last vestige of civilization is gone, there will finally be nothing left to stop us. Whites don't lose wars to monkeys.

Racism's Prerequisites:

Racism is an ideology, a belief system, one reaches only at the end of a very long journey. Antisemitism is the same. The only way to reach these conclusions is through a long and winding intellectual journey that first discovers many other, more essential and primordial truths. Only once people have accepted all the previous realizations, can they ever move on to the more complicated belief in racism.

Racism is not a popular ideology, not because of WWII, or how our message is presented, or the personal failings of racists, or any other simplistic explanation. The real reason racism is unpopular is because it rests upon a bed of logical assumptions that most of humanity has not yet accepted. People are rejecting the foundations of racism, which then leaves racism to seemingly float in midair with zero support from any principled foundation. It's pretty easy to reject racism, once you've completely undermined the very reasons to be a racist in the first place. If people poke a hole, break a pillar of support, in any one of the underlying assumptions, it is then safe to reject racism, sexism, antisemitism, etc on the basis that one of its pillars is unsound.

Of course, none of racism's pillars are unsound -- but humanity would like to believe they are. This is because it would be more comforting if they were false. Or, the subject matter is too complicated for their tiny pea brains and they prefer a more 'common sense' theory. If evolution doesn't make sense to them, if they can't imagine how a whale can be related to a dog, then they'll just throw out the entire theory, rather than admit they're simply too stupid to understand. These are the actual problems facing racism: Moral cowards and intellectual lightweights. The moral cowards see quite clearly that the pillars of racism are true, but can't accept it and retreat into doublethink and spiritual self-censorship, to avoid the conclusions staring them in the face. Intellectual lightweights seize upon extraneous superficialities and become so fixated on their own narrow horizons of thought, they can't imagine a world as complicated as our own. It is more likely we will discover the fundamental laws of motion, before we discover the laws of human behavior and decode why people do what they do. Therefore, humanity is the most complicated subject in nature -- it's obvious stupid people will be unable to understand the points made about human nature, by those with higher IQ. It will fly over their heads just like quarks and quasars do.

I suppose there is a third group that makes racism impossible, and that is people who understand full well the underlying truths that lead to racism, and thus are extremely racist themselves, but nevertheless combat racism and antisemitism out of pure self interest. These people follow Lenin's creed of "Who? Whom?" They are certainly ruthless enough to face the truth and smart enough to realize the truth, they are simply too hypocritical to actually publish or defend the truth. Luckily, I believe this crowd is in the minority and that furthermore, their power and influence would be completely swamped if the cowards and idiots were dealt with. Though certainly the most dangerous and respectable adversary on a per capita basis, they are in a sense a footnote to the true conflict, which is the great morass of humanity still stuck in the stone age.

Here I will try and explain what the pillars of racism are, and why they are all essential to being a racist anti-semite, and why they are true. Honestly, racism is just the capstone of a philosophical pyramid, it's the least interesting and important step in the theory, simply a logical conclusion following from our pre-existing principles. Once you realize all the pillars of creation, the conclusions are as simple as adding 2+2 to reach 4. There is no major leap between these truths, and the socially ostracized conclusions -- the part about being a racist is a mere consequence of one's thinking, not the basis or cause. Which is why ascribing evil motives or emotions for the basis of racism is so comical. Racism is a conclusion, it is caused by the rest of true philosophy, it is the cause of nothing. There is no motive behind being a racist antisemite save one, the wish to follow the light of truth and avoid the pitfalls of cowardice, stupidity or hypocrisy.

Pillar #1: Atheism.

Atheism is essential to racism, for many reasons. Since atheism is even less popular than racism, it's interesting to see how selective racism is. To be a racist, much is required of your intellect and courage, it's not something people can accept lightly. Why can't people believe in a God, a creation myth, an afterlife, divine justice, etc and be racist? Where is the contradiction?

Let me count the ways! Suppose there is a creation myth. This means God created the world the way it is today, and approves of it. This is the best of all possible worlds. In that case we should fatalistically accept whatever God hands us. If the world looks inscrutably bad to us, and we wish it were different, we can just console ourselves that God works in mysterious ways, and let alone. Only by rejecting a creation myth, can people realize that we are where we are today through spontaneous chance, that there is nothing innately good about the status quo, that there is nothing protecting us from a sudden downturn in our fortune, nor is there anything stopping us from creating a much better utopia out of the materials we have at hand. With a creation myth, evolution can't exist. Without a creation myth, we can understand evolution, and thus understand the power of genetics and harness this to our will. Without evolution, life, and humanity, makes no sense. At this point stupid people insert some logical fallacy like 'God did it.' Not realizing that a) God is even more inscrutable than evolution. b) Occam's razor rules out including unnecessary components like a separate universe, supernatural forces, a Maker, etc when evolution can explain it all within the known observable universe. c) Who made God?

Perhaps the creation myth isn't the worst part about God, however. The afterlife is probably much worse. If there is an afterlife, it follows logically that everything you do in this life is of minimal importance. Instead of maximizing the welfare and good fortune of your fellow man, instead of trying to make a contribution to the future of mankind, there is a sudden priority override. Since a single person's life, if immortal, will feel and do more than the entire accumulated lifespan of everyone who will ever live in this universe, one immortal soul's fate is more important than the entire fate of the universe. With such a ridiculous and yet logical position, people will do one of two things -- seek personal salvation at the cost of all worldly interests, or seek the salvation of others at the cost of all worldly interests. Either way, the entire brain is fried, the programming becomes utterly senseless to the interests of life, humanity, or basic material reality. There is no current religion whose ticket to the afterlife is to maximize the worldly interests of the people of this universe. If so, it might be possible through sheer coincidence to be religious and still materialist and utilitarian. Instead the religions demand things in complete contradiction to our worldly needs. In Buddhism, people are supposed to stop caring about the world, meditate, and offer pacifism in the face of aggression. Instead of improving the material lot of man, they spend endless time trying to improve their spirits, which don't even exist -- but that doesn't stop them. India was mired in complete stagnation due to their beliefs and was the punching bag of any army that marauded through. Even today, India is the concentration of the greatest poverty and woe in the world outside of Africa. Westernizing influence for hundreds of years finds it very tough work to improve society in the face of a religion who has no interest in their own damn lives. And yes, Hinduism is different from Buddhism, but how different, really? Instead of caring about the world, you are supposed to simply accept it as the result of one's karma. If you believe in a divine justice ruling the world, you by default have no interest in imposing a personal justice on the world in defiance of God. You are born into your caste, and your only goal is to abide by the rules of your religion, in the hopes of being reincarnated into a different caste -- or the more ominous 'escaping the cycle of rebirth' which just means the ultimate goal of Hinduism is death. Whee.

For Islam, the best possible route to salvation is through martyrdom in the course of Jihad. Muhammed praises over and over again how dying in battle against the infidels is more favored by Allah than 40 years of fasting and praying. There is basically no sure ticket to paradise save through violent jihad, and the rewards of martyrs are much greater than non-martyrs anyway. Wherever the religion does hold sway, people are not allowed to pursue their worldly interests. Instead they are stuck in stagnation, endlessly repeating prayers five times a day, rejecting all science as contra-Islam, refusing to change any law code because it was established by God, even if one's material conditions are far different than the one's found in 600 AD Arabia. Islam does not promote worldly good, but since paradise is eternal, as is hell, the fate of one single soul's salvation or damnation is worth the slaughter of billions here on earth. After all, lifespans on earth are mere candlelight flickers in the face of immortality. Add up the lifespan of every infidel who lives today, or who will ever live, and then kill them all -- if it means Allah favors a single jihadi for his service, then overall a great good has occurred. All life combined is a mere candle flicker to immortality.

Christianity has the same problem. There's no point to this life. Jesus himself counsels people to disregard their worldly interests and look to the afterlife. "What use is there in laying up treasures on earth? People should seek to lay up treasure in heaven." A good Christian, one can derive from the teachings of the bible, is a missionary, an ascetic, a childless virgin, a meek, foolish, poor person, a pacifist who turns the other cheek when abused, and so on and so forth. There couldn't be a more suicidal religion designed if we tried. While Islam excels at promoting murder, Christianity excels at suicide. God actually favors virgins and the childless: As Paul wrote -- "It would be preferable if everyone stayed a virgin and single like me, but if they find that too difficult, it is (he grudgingly supposes) better to marry than to burn." What the hell is that? As though loving sex in the interest of perpetuating the species were immoral, illegitimate, or somehow disfavored in the eyes of God. I don't know of any religion save Christianity that promotes such an evil, diseased belief.

The endless charity and missionary services sent to Africa, the endless foreign aid from western countries that are already deep in debt and can't take care of their own people, is all due to Christianity. Without this poisonous belief that sacrificing our worldly interests will help us reach heaven and avoid hell, all of our senseless actions would disappear. The same for our ridiculous mercy given to criminals, and Amy Biehl's parents hugging and forgiving their daughters' murderers. It's all due to the poisonous teachings of Christianity, it's all for the sake of salvation, it makes no sense whatsoever from the perspective of this life.

In short, any belief in an afterlife haywires and short circuits the normal logic of good and bad, right and wrong, beneficial and harmful. Anyone who believes that reaching the afterlife trumps all other values, cannot be a racist. Because all material interests, including the betterment of one's race, are as dust and dross to the religious. Anyone who believes in God and the afterlife, has no time for such petty and meaningless concerns, and will sacrifice them in an eye blink for their personal salvation. Such people can't be trusted to be racist, and can never truly be racist, no matter what they say. When the rubber hits the road, they know where their bread is buttered -- and it isn't anywhere in this world.

Furthermore, as almost every religion believes that God is currently dispensing justice onto this world, and is somehow overlooking and guiding the fate of mankind, it would be heresy to rebel against the status quo or seek to change anything. Religion introduces a force of inertia into all our dealings. If someone proposes eliminating gays or retards or criminals, we can always bet the religious will pipe up saying that these people are 'natural' and 'God-given' and that God would disapprove of trying to remake the world. They constantly talk about all the harm atheists cause by pursuing a material utopia as opposed to an utopian afterlife. Of course, they never mention how much harm they do to material utopians by pursuing an utopian afterlife at our expense. The fact that we are forced to live cheek by jowl with subhumans, thugs, braindead animals, degenerates and parasites all due to their divine plan is swept under the rug. Any belief in a divine plan, karma, or a secret justice underlying the dealings of our world discredits any attempt to change or remake the planet along racial lines. Or along any materialist, utilitarian lines. As far as they're concerned, God will work everything out for us, we should therefore do nothing and just go with the flow. In such barren soil, the extremism necessary for real change is incapable of growth.

Apart or separately, belief in God and religion completely eviscerates racism. Phony patchwork methods of trying to link racism to various biblical verses (which can be interpreted any way one pleases) did not save the Confederacy, and it will not save us. Confederates had all sorts of biblical pretexts for enslaving blacks, but no one bought it. Why? Because God would not have created blacks if he did not love them and wish them well, if he did not have some plan for them. The moment blacks were classified as having souls, the end was nigh. A single black person's salvation was more important than the worldly interest of the entire Confederacy. Even if slavery was necessary to the economy, even if getting rid of slavery would lead to high crime, interbreeding, and the rape of southern women -- what is any of that to the salvation of a single black soul? Since slavery was seen as imperiling to the souls of the slaves and slavers alike, all material concerns were considered -- correctly if there really is an afterlife -- to be utter irrelevancies.

The sooner racists abandon their religion the better. They are on illogical, non-solid ground. Simply desiring to have their cake and eat it too, they take on the logically contradictory belief that A) there is a God, an afterlife, a divine plan, and a creation myth and B) it's okay to upset all of these things for the sake of saving one's race. Sorry, buckos. If there is a God, your only allegiance can be to Him. Everything must be sacrificed to him, nothing is left for the race. Just give it up and go home to the nice cozy anti-racism all your fellow believers have already accepted. There is a reason religion is one of the leading promoters of anti-racism and racial suicide. It's because the logical conclusion of any religious person is the death of the white race. There is no avoiding it. Silly nonsense verses patched together from here and there, cannot offset the ultimate logic underlying the nature of God and the defined routes to heaven. If people aren't even supposed to preserve their own lives or have children, there can be no divine sanction for preserving the race. There is no value whatsoever in perpetuating life on this planet. According to Christianity, it would be better if everyone stopped having children and we could just get on with the afterlife portion of God's plan. According to Islam, unless you're willing to accept incredible hardship and tedium and obey all of Allah's wishes for the rest of time, and doom the planet to complete stagnation (until the sun explodes and we all die), you're a marked man and eventually Allah will send his minions to chop off your head. Either way you're fucked. All religions are anti-thetical to life, and thus to any attempt at preserving life, including the life of your race.

Pillar #2: Utilitarianism

Now that everyone left is a materialist, we must ask ourselves, what will we value in this material world? What will we define as Good or Bad? It's completely up to us, and depending on the choices we make, we can either get one step closer to racism, or eliminate any chance of reaching it. There are plenty of philosophies to choose from, all of them poisonous and destructive to humanity's future. There is only one philosophy that protects us and leads to a better world. This is utility -- measuring the goodness or badness of things, based on the overall impact they have on the happiness/well-being of life. Utilitarianism reaches radically different conclusions than any other belief system. In Utilitarianism, the ends justify the means. This is absolutely necessary if we are going to be racists. There is no other way. Being a racist, sexist, anti-semite, inevitably ends in harming someone, however little, and making someone somewhere worse off than they currently are under the present system. No matter how much we sugar the pill, until we accept that the ends justify the means, there will be no way to 'morally' move forward. All other moral systems thus fail.

For instance, as much as I love Kant, his categorical imperative "to treat people as end's in themselves," is hopelessly contradictory. If the well being of a single person is the end goal of existence, then everyone else's well being should be sacrificed for his sake. However, Kant says every single person's well being is the end goal of existence. Who, then, should be sacrificed to whom? It's impossible to promote everyone's well being at once. The moral system simply crashes, just like the golden rule. "Treat others as you would wish to be treated." But of course, I would wish to be treated like a God, or at least a King. I would want endless tribute, praise, wealth, and women to come free of charge. Therefore, how do I intend to treat everyone as well as I'd like to be treated? It's impossible to promote everyone's welfare to the ridiculous amount as to place it as the moral End of existence. Instead we must sacrifice all personal moral ends -- like objectivists who say individuals are the ends of existence -- and retreat to a more limited, sensible end that can encompass all people. A utilitarian's end is much more objective, it worries about the larger picture, and is thus able to stay self-consistent and actually implementable. A utilitarian says, treat these things of highest value, and do what you must so that the greatest amount of it exists in the 4 dimensional universe that is space and time. There are no contradictions, only road bumps. If something is good, but not as good as something else, we get rid of that good thing. If something is bad, but not as bad as something else, we implement the bad thing. We don't get hamstrung by stupid rules requiring we maximize good in reference to all possible subjects, we take the objective view that some people's lives will be made worse for the sake of others being made better.

We accept the very phrase of Kant: From the crooked timber of humanity, nothing ever did grow smooth.

What does this mean? It means that with the universe we were given, a universe that arrived through spontaneous chance and has no interest in our welfare, a universe where evil has as much survival value as good, a universe where natural forces proceed completely heedless of what life might wish for, we can not save everyone. We cannot help everyone. We can't treat everyone in the best possible way. We have to accept a crooked, non-smooth course that tries its best to minimize the suffering and maximize the happiness of our people, given the limitations nature has put upon us. Not following this path and mindlessly insisting that everyone be treated as sacrosanct and infinitely precious, just leads to contradictions and paradoxes, because that simply isn't the universe we live in. Wishing can't make it so.

There are numerous answers to what we should value in a materialist universe like our own.

Answer #1: The meaning of life is more and better life.
Answer #2: The meaning of life is to reach infinite power, complexity, intelligence, and resilience, the goal of all life forms as seen through the process of evolution on earth.
Answer #3: We are the eye through which the universe beholds itself and knows itself divine.
Answer #4: We are vessels of divinities much higher than ourselves, who by our existence, can express themselves through us: Truth, Beauty, and Love.

There are many other formulations, all right in their own way. For such a beautiful subject as what is good about the world, much can be said, much can be included, and it's rare to grasp the entire knot in a single statement. Suffice to say, Utility is aiming for truly splendid things. These ends really do justify the means. Reaching these ends really is meaningful and important. There is value without God giving us any. From an imperfect world, truly sacred and divine, perfect, moral absolutes can be reached -- given time and effort, we can accomplish anything.

The existence of objective moral absolutes is necessary for utilitarianism. Cultural and moral relativism, that posits no definite conclusion can be reached about what is good or bad, and thus we should just leave everything alone and go with the flow, is essentially the same problem as the religious people's 'divine plan.' Relativists, who are unsure of any value, cannot calculate whether blacks or whites are superior or inferior. They cannot calculate even whether bugs or humans are superior or inferior. Only moral absolutes with set laws and goals, can define who is superior or inferior. A superior person or object, is that which better furthers the ultimate goal of Utilitarianism -- whatever that goal might be. It is easy to understand, easy to see, and thus easy to decide. Once we know what we want, it's easy to see how best to go about getting it. The big step was deciding what we wanted, and deciding that the ends justify the means. Racism is a little step. Once we know we want the values listed above, it's obvious that the white race, and perhaps the east asians, are the people best able to achieve these ends. Then it becomes obvious that we should promote their interests over and above all other races on earth, for the sake of maximizing life's, mankind's, and Good's utility. Racism is usually defined as viewing one race as superior to another. But only utilitarianism arms people with an objective absolute that can measure races, or people, and decide who is superior and who is inferior. Without that code, we are left with a vague morass. Social contract theory? That says nothing about what the contract should be. Kantian golden rule formulas? That says everyone is to be equally valued regardless of their nature. Individualism? The same rule. Socratic formulas of ethics? But they only deal with personal virtues and avoid larger systems like the morality of societies and nations. All religions have already been discussed and dismissed. Relativism? But that simply says nothing is of value, since it's all in the eye of the beholder. There's no point to anything after that.

If you want to be a racist, you have to be a Materialist Utilitarian first. There is no other way. For all the weak of heart, who refuse to sanction hurting anyone or treating anyone as less than absolutely essential/pivotal/priceless, their journey ends here. Atheists who are not utilitarians, will end up in some morass of nihilism, relativism, Ayn Randian individual subjectivism, or simply incoherent wishes to see everyone happy and the beginning of the age of Aquarius. It's likely that somewhere in here they resort to the epicurean plan: 'eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow we die.' A utilitarian never dies --- we live in a four dimensional universe, and the actions we take today affect the entire rest of the future -- trillions of lives and billions of years to come, will all be shaped by what we do here and now. So long as we value those outcomes, it will be as important to us, how we affect the future long after we are dead, as it is to us how we've affected our loved ones today. We have no need to resort to despair or escapism, because we have a noble, higher calling, far better than drugs, drink, or sex. We have the fate of the universe in our hands. Our moral system is nothing less than remaking the world in our image, to become God and rule the world. Utilitarianism is the most hopeful, powerful, and aggrandizing belief possible. People are not helpless cogs in a system, like God's plan would have us be. We are actors on a giant stage with the highest stakes imaginable. We are the key to the world, the pivot, the fulcrum upon which destiny teeters. Though happiness may elude the Utilitarian, purpose and pride never does. Out of all the choices we can make in this crooked world, it's about the best we can hope for.

Pillar #3: Malthusianism

The third pillar of racism is belief in limited resources. The 'dismal science,' as Darwin's time period called it. Malthus reached a startling conclusion that had somehow eluded all previous eras: That life grew diametrically, and yet resource accumulation could only grow arithmetically. Therefore life had built into it the source of its own misery. No matter how efficient or powerful we become, we will not be able to satisfy everyone's desires completely. Even if people have only a 1% population growth rate, the law of exponents means this will translate into trillions and trillions of babies being born per second, deep in the future. There is no way to support this kind of population, not even with every star in the galaxy under our control. Ultimately, we will at some point have to decide on a stable, sustainable population. At that point, we will have to choose winners and losers. Who gets to live? Who do we not have space for? Who isn't 'spongeworthy' as Elayne would say? Every single person's existence on this planet, comes at the expense of someone else. They are taking up a space, devouring resources, that could have gone elsewhere. In a malthusian world, people have to justify their life, they can't just take it for granted.

We did not invent malthusianism, we discovered it. The nature of the universe is such, that there will always be limited resources, and that one person's gain is another's loss. Even having three children per family represents a massive 50% growth rate that is utterly unsustainable for even a short time on this earth. If we want some populations to rise, we must first make others fall. It isn't out of sadism or hatred that we wish others ill, it's because this is the way the world works, and when handed lemons, it's best to make lemonade. Life is a zero-sum game, those who recognize this, hardly made it that way. We just acknowledge it and follow the rules. Those who don't, perish along the wayside. Life is cruel, there is no room left for pussies.

In a world without malthusian limits, in a world of infinite resources, utilitarianism would not amount to much. We could simply give everyone everything, make some more trillions of people of all varied worths, and then give them everything as well. Since every additional person, no matter how mediocre, is better than nothing, we would have no ability to discriminate between people -- it's impossible to reach a 'bigger infinity' by promoting infinite good people over infinite average people. Infinity is simply infinity.

In a world of malthusian limits, stark choices present themselves. Every single baby on earth represents a unit: Such and such amount of energy, metals, water, trees, carbon dioxide, oxygen, phosphate, surface area, and so on must be devoted to this child. Those resources are now unavailable to any other prospective child, the opportunities of others are forever closed. Giving birth is an act of war with the entire world. It is a declaration that henceforth, you intend to double the devouring of resources for your own sake, and everyone else has to give way and give up their portion to make this so. The idea that people can generate the extra wealth that they then use to provide for the child is an illusion. Man cannot generate anything, we are incapable of creating new resources. All we can do is accumulate what was already there, and this in a world of entropy where every step we take only leads to less and less usable forms of energy. The more activity we do, the more quickly we break down the universe into a vast stellar void. There is no way to 'generate' wealth, or 'produce' resources. All we can do is devour and consume them. Life is like a gravity well. We begin at a great height, the accumulated energy of the sun, the supernovas that formed our elements that make up the earth, and the product of the big bang. We can only go down from here. We eat the sun in terms of fossil fuels, we eat the supernovas of the past in terms of nuclear power, and we eat the big bang every time we take a sip of h2o. Every time we eat something, we convert some of our potential life energy into kinetic (expressed) life energy, and descend further into the well. There is no way back up, our entire trajectory is downwards to oblivion. What we eat today, we can never get back tomorrow. Every resource used is gone forever.

People aren't really 'creating' wealth. What they are doing, is gathering it. By gathering up some oil, some water, some food, or some precious metals, we assume we somehow 'earned' it. However, it's impossible to earn that which you had no hand in making. All the person did is gather it. If he didn't gather it, it would've been available to someone else in the future. Nothing is gained from you, in particular, being the one who got it. That's just egoism. There is hardly any virtue in grabbing the Christmas turkey and devouring it whole before any other family member did. Saying how difficult it was to digest the whole thing, or how hard it was to cut the turkey, will not impress your family members. All they see is that you got the turkey and they didn't.

From this perspective, it's obvious that in order to maximize our resources, we must very carefully discriminate about who we give our resources, and who should fill these limited slots that life allows. We are living on borrowed time, with only so much money. Every purchase we make now simply depletes our bank account -- there is no way to replenish it -- the law of entropy does not allow such nonsense. Therefore, only the wisest and most deliberative of purchases should be made. With an eye towards scraping every last vestige out of every choice we make, we need to elongate and preserve as much good as we can out of the limited resources we have. Throwing away our entire bank account on a wild party or a new set of golf clubs is not reasonable. We have what we have, and it has to go the entire way, from life's beginning to life's end. It should be invested in that which yields the greatest glory, the greatest happiness, the greatest knowledge, the greatest power, the greatest security we can find. Immediately upon deciding that we are going to be frugal and careful with how we spend our limited resources, we must then decide who is the ideal life form to spend our resources on. Will it be ants? Bacteria? Bugs? Monkeys? Dogs? Blacks? Whites? Asians? Jews? Who will we trust with our bank account of limited goods? Who do we want to blow our wad on? We only get one chance, the money is never coming back. Who best deserves the future of mankind, who will get the most out of life, who can translate these limited goods into our highest values?

It's obvious to me who deserves our limited resources, who best achieves the valuable things about life, how to maximize our utility. The only race whose track record speaks for itself: the white race.

Look at what blacks do with our world. They turn it into fly-blown rape and murder carnivals, where no one thinks an intelligent thought in their lives, and no building even reaches a second story. Or look at what India has done with itself, or the Aztecs, or the australian aborigines. They are all pathetic, it goes from stagnant and insignificant, to outright vicious and negative. It would be better that life simply did not exist at all, than life be represented by the Aztecs. I swear, there is more suffering and evil in the world, than any good could possibly recompense, with them at the helm. Asians are a more tricky question. They were seemingly inept at reaching Truth, the ideals of abstract logic, math, and science completely passed them by. They weren't very loving either, romance was muted and pair bonding was weak, men did not feel heavily invested in their wives. The relationship between civilians and leaders was also unloving. People were treated disgracefully, often mutilated or enslaved, and they died in droves every time a famine came due to high taxes or warmongering luxurious court nobles. Asians did have a fine aesthetic sense and an eye to beauty. They are themselves noble and beautiful bodies and forms, which they can take pride in. If Asians could somehow be tinkered with and altered enough, it's possible they really would be a worthy investment in the future. They could be our best representative and the best inheritor of this limited resource universe that can only afford to support the best. What about jews? To me, the answer is obvious. A race that was founded on bloody conflict and has done nothing but prey on others their entire existence long, cannot be considered the epitome of mankind or the wave of the future. Despite all the achievements their intelligence can lay claim to, their morality suffers so acutely that it's hard to differentiate them from the Aztecs. How is it possible that this one single tribe has been kicked out of 50 different countries, all of whom at first welcomed them and wished them well? How is it possible that empires collapse wherever jews go, like a black plague? First it was the Roman Empire, then Poland, Russia, Germany, and now America. Who can have faith in a group of people who have destroyed everything they ever touched and laid to ruin every country they ever inhabited? Is Israel supposed to make me feel better? That is one of the most wretched countries on earth, full of violence and oppression, poor and backwards, and unlikely to even survive another century. Should humanity be one giant Israel? You've got to do better than that. Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, and China are far superior to that model. It's simply no contest. Intelligence isn't enough. If you don't have a soul, if you're a bloodsucking plague, it doesn't matter how intelligently you go about your life cycle. It doesn't matter if you're a sentient disease! The question is, is this a path to more truth, beauty, and love? For a race that still celebrates its slaughter of egyptians and babylonians as religious holidays every year, I'd say they're a group that is furthest from such ideals.

However, there is one group I have faith in. Perhaps not the whites of today, but definitely the whites of yesteryear. As Human Accomplishment (by charles murray) shows, practically every achievement ever made, has been made by whites. White greeks, white romans, white renaissance, white enlightenment, white industrial revolution, white scientific age, white age of discovery, white everything. No matter where you look, anything good on earth, is probably due to some white male who invented it or discovered it was true. That's not all, whites are uniquely beautiful in their physical form. Not only to other whites, but all mankind wishes they were pale, colorful in hair and eye, tall, and hormonally feminine/masculine as we are. We are the measuring stick of beauty. The blacks try to rape us, the arabs bought our women at twice the price for slaves, the Indians use skin bleaching treatments to look more like us, and so on.

Not only that, but whites are the basis for the romantic love that so enriches our lives. The idea of chivalry, of women's innate gentleness, wisdom and virtue, of monogamous marriage, and of romantic love and courtship, are virtually unique to whites. The warmth of emotion we feel for our children is also unique. Blacks and other low IQ groups don't even attempt to rear their children, just leaving them feral on the streets to tend for themselves. Asians do care deeply for their children, but in such a strict and cold manner, that it leaves the children very unhappy throughout. An Asian helping their kid probably has strict curfews, requires they study a lot, forbids them from dating until they're out of college, and so on. Sure, it works, and they rear their children to succeed in life, but it isn't the love I'm searching for. There is something incredibly heartwarming about a happy home. A happy home is like a holy grail. When one comes upon children who laugh, parents who gaze at each other lovingly, and siblings who stand up for each other or look after one another, you have reached heaven. A white heaven. A feature of life so rarely seen anywhere else, unique to our Jane Austen novel existence, our white spirit. Gazing upon a story where a little sister takes care of her older sister when she's sick or helps her finish her homework because she's hopelessly airheaded, is something deeply more satisfying than watching a kid pass a test or eat healthily due to a parent's diligent oversight.

So one thing is clear, in a malthusian universe like ours, where every baby counts, and every person living means someone else can never be born -- not now, and not in the future, as the resource is entropically lost forever -- we should be looking for people who are best capable of progress, people who are happy, and people who already are closest to our ideal man. Even if Asians were closer to perfection, their lack of progress would be a worrisome factor. Only whites have shown themselves capable of great leaps of innovation and change. Only whites produce revolution after revolution, each dramatically more impressive than the last. We change our music, our art, our literature, and our knowledge of chemistry, biology, math, and physics at a blazing speed. Every other day we come out with a patent for some new invention. For instance, we just discovered how to make sperm cells from stem cells. Where were the africans who made that invention possible? Where were the mexicans? It always falls to the white man to make progress. Without us, where would the world be? What are the odds it would ever improve again? When you add everything up, the answer is clear. Utility wise, the average white is more valuable than the average non-white on earth. They are the best of humanity, the best life can offer. Therefore, maximizing whites while minimizing all other races and lifeforms, is the best possible path for our future.

Just as obviously as racism, other conclusions follow. For instance, straights lead a better life than gays, so eliminating gays so that there is more room for straights, becomes sensible. Intelligent people lead better lives than dumb people, so eliminating dumb people so there is more room for smart people, becomes sensible. Mentally insane and retarded cripples are less valuable than healthy babies, so we should eliminate them, free up the resources, and spend those resources on new children with real potential and value. Discrimination is pretty universal, it doesn't stop on just race. Once it's clear one life form is superior to another, there's very little left to argue about, except how we should go about replacing the latter with the former. The idea that the inferior should simply stick around, and be left to its own devices, that it should be allowed to prosper and even triumph, is absurd.

The calculation needn't be this crude however. There is no reason why we can't favor exceptional non-whites over whites. There is no reason why we can't favor some whites over others. There is no reason why we can't seek to bestow 'whiteness' on nonwhites and thus convert them into more of us, instead of exterminate them and have more babies ourselves. There is no reason why we couldn't try to interbreed and create new characteristics that ameliorate the faults of others, or accentuate their strengths. There is still a lot of latitude on where to go from here. However, there is no way to avoid becoming a racist antisemite. There is no way to not believe in white racial superiority, there is no way to not be disgusted with the lifestyles and behavior of jews and blacks, there is no way to be neutral when it comes to white racial suicide, there is no way to avoid the truth that the future by all rights belongs to us and we of all people have the past to prove it. All of these things make you racist by default, regardless of the means you choose to employ to pursue your values. Whether the means are fluffy or vicious, the ends will justify them. Es ist mir egal, as the Germans would phrase it. I don't care how we get to where we need to be, I just care that we get there. Anything that works, we should do that. In the face of the trillions of people yet to come and the quality of their lives, any suffering we cause in the world of today is meaningless. Any harm we cause will be made up in the billions of years to come, amid lifeforms so grand we have no conception of their worth, that we and we alone made possible, through the actions we took here and now. Their existence justifies anything we might do to make them possible, just as their loss is immeasurably higher than any loss we might suffer today. Therefore, we should be willing to sacrifice anything, and destroy anything, that gets in their existence's way. Fanaticism is the logical consequence of Atheist Materialist Utilitarian Malthusianism, and it's sheer nonsense to be a moderate once you've come this far. Sheer cowardice.

By pushing for Atheism, Utilitarianism, or Malthusianism, you are a shadow warrior for racism, homophobia, cognitive elitism, antisemitism, and so on. By arguing against Atheism, Utilitarianism, or Malthusianism, you are a shadow warrior for the death of the white race and a new dark age. Whether people realize it or not, the battlelines are not fought at 'racism' vs. 'anti-racism.' They are fought at a much deeper level, between God vs. Man, Objective vs. Subjective, Absolute vs. Relative, the belief that we can 'earn' and 'produce' vs. the dismal science that we can only consume and the 2nd law of thermodynamics is our doom. Unless all your ducks are in a row, racism will never be the sensible alternative. Unless we get everyone else's philosophical ducks in a row, they will never conclude that they should be racists.

Buchanen showed how fruitless it was to be a religious racist in his article about evolution, the same is true of anyone who attempts to be pro-white, but cannot get their philosophical act together. Unless you stand on sound logical principles, you'll inevitably falter at some point. For instance, you won't accept the ends justify the means, and thus you'll be powerless to implement the only program that could possibly save the white race. Or you'll grow weary of the world and put your hope in the next life sorting everything out for you. Or you'll give up and turn to drugs and alcohol. Or you'll think we can somehow build our way out of our structural difficulties, by just making a little more money or a little better technology, that can eventually solve all our problems. The mistakes are many, the path narrow. We'll never get anywhere, until our feet stand firmly upon the one and only Truth that governs this world. From there, we can achieve anything. Without it, we'll never amount to a farthing.

If atheist utilitarian malthusianism ever became the dominant philosophy of the earth, you can bet racism would succeed in the course of around two days or so -- everyone would agree with it and endorse it heartily. Until these beliefs dominate the earth, racism will always be an undesirable fringe -- even if you scream until you're blue in the face. The choice is yours. Champion racism's prerequisites, or abandon them and thus racism as well. You can't have it both ways.