Mass Immigration is Genocide:

Perhaps white people are too stupid to eat solid food. They have to have their information imparted to them as predigested mush, like apple sauce. The Bell Curve, Dysngenics, Why Race Matters, Race, Evolution, and Behavior, Understanding Human History, IQ and Global Inequality, and all the other books written by scientists to explain the scientific findings of the demographic realities of the world around us are just too hard for white people to understand. Whites are the stupidest and worst race on Earth precisely because they have no survival instinct. The first mistake whites make is they think that they aren't in danger. It's impossible to maintain a survival instinct if people, like dodos, are not frightened when hunters come to wring their necks.

But mass immigration does endanger our lives. Because I'm talking to babies who can't seem to understand the most simple realities that face our world, I'll break it down into as simple a list as possible. Here is how mass immigration into all white homelands imperils the survival of the white race:

1. Direct Action -- Whites are routinely killed in their homelands by non-whites. This is well documented in places like South Africa, that has 3,000+ white farmers murdered by non-whites since the end of Apartheid. These non-whites also enjoy raping and torturing their victims, just to spruce their genocide up. Outside of South Africa the same pattern is visible though. Black murder rates are 9 times that of whites, and half of their murders are directed at whites. This means that whites are 4 times as likely to be murdered by a black than by another white. That's not all though! Blacks and hispanics are commonly inept drivers, driving drunk, drugged, speeding, or just driving dumb. Recently, 15 people were killed by an out of control bus -- driven by a black. Much of the carnage and death on our roadways is due to non-white drivers.

The direct action continues though! 3,000 Americans were murdered on 9/11 because of legal immigrant non-white Muslims who rammed our planes into various buildings. Muslim American terrorists are continuously plotting and sometimes succeeding in adding to that total.

All of these direct actions pale before the possibility of a new genocide however. Once whites have become an outnumbered, powerless minority like the jews of Germany or the Armenians of Turkey, what is to stop non-whites from simply rounding us up and slaughtering us all? They have every reason to hate and resent us, due to all the racial grievances they have been nursing for centuries. They constantly sing about killing us in their rap music. The Nation of Islam teaches that we are inhuman, blue-eyed devils. Non-whites constantly demean us with terms like Ameri-KKK and cornpone Nazis, which infers that we are so evil we deserve to die. Furthermore, luminaries like Susan Sontag have called us the 'cancer of human history,' Noel Ignatiev says that the white race must be abolished, and Tim Wise joyously contemplates the day when the white race's heart stops beating.

The level of race hatred directed against whites by non-whites is so white-hot (to forgive the pun) that it would be insane to give non-whites the power to act upon their own fantasies and desires. Whites could laugh it all off as just non-whites 'venting steam' and once they're in power they will 'moderate themselves.' But why should we trust to that? Plenty of jews hoped Mein Kampf was Hitler just 'blowing steam' and that he'd 'moderate himself once he achieved high office.' That didn't work out too well for them, did it? Why should we repeat the same mistake, and not take seriously what non-whites actually think and say about us, and what they want to do to us? A popular South African song during Apartheid was "Kill the Boer, Kill the Farmer." Once Apartheid was over the popular song became a reality -- 3,000 white farmers have been murdered. It appears the blacks of South Africa didn't get that it was just 'a song' 'venting steam.'

2. Economic Competition: There is a finite amount of natural resources on Earth. Every non-white born in the world is competing with whites for said resources. Obviously, if a non-white consumes said resource, this resource is unavailable for a white to consume. If enough non-whites consume enough resources, there will be scarcities in vital goods and the white population will, of necessity, be forced to decrease since its former total is no longer supportable. This issue becomes even more acute when non-whites are allowed to immigrate directly inside our borders. Generally, nations are not so stupid that they would give away the bounty of their natural resources to outsiders for free. If we want to buy oil from Saudi Arabia, we have to pay them in an equivalent amount of goods or services. But the same is not true of people within our borders, who, as 'co-citizens,' have the same right to our natural resources, domestic jobs, tax dollars and land as native whites. The economic competition between humans is the exact same as two animals who compete over the same prey -- they are natural enemies, like lions and hyenas. Both can't survive, eventually one or the other claims the resources of an area for itself in a war, because there isn't enough prey to go around for an indefinite number of lions and hyenas. Any extra hyenas will require the lion population to go down, and vise versa. They are locked in a war of extermination wherever their hunting ranges overlap.

Non-whites have additional advantages over whites when it comes to economic competition. For one thing, they are ruthless. Non-whites are willing to vote themselves money and live on the dole, while most whites are too ashamed to do the same. This means whites, every year, lose trillions of dollars they produced, fair and square, themselves, and non-whites gain trillions of dollars they voted themselves as 'co-citizen' immigrants. These trillions of dollars lost to the white community reduce our carrying capacity, because they could have been spent on more white children. In turn, they increase the carrying capacity of non-whites, who promptly use the money to have more non-white children. Since everyone has a vote, this strategy will eventually mean non-whites, as the future majority, can vote themselves ALL the money whites make, and thus make it impossible for whites to support their own children -- we will be tax slaves who live only to support non-white children until the bitter end.

For another, non-whites are willing to live in much worse conditions than whites. They seem to be inured to pain and misfortune, or somehow insensible to it. In any event, this gives them a decisive advantage in terms of pushing us out of our economic niche. They can work under worse conditions, for less pay, than white workers are willing to offer. Just looking at the work conditions in China, where people never even leave their factories and work 18 hour days, getting to visit their families maybe twice a year, all for nickles an hour, fills a white heart with dread. How can we compete with that? We can't. And yet, if we don't have a job, we can't support a family. Through sheer pain tolerance, non-whites can steal away our livelihoods and thus our reproductive future. Whites are not willing to significantly lower their quality of life. If they can't provide a nice house, a nice school, etc for their children, they simply forgo having them. Non-whites have no such considerations, however. They simply reproduce and let fate work it out. This means that non-white economic competition need only depress white wages and employment in order to dramatically decrease our birth rates -- it is unnecessary to completely impoverish or unemploy whites to genocide us, white instincts will take care of the rest if you just make us economically uncomfortable.

3. Miscegenation: Obviously if a white reproduces with a non-white, their children will no longer be white. The white race would die out tomorrow if all whites married and reproduced exclusively with non-whites. Every time a white decides to reproduce with a non-white, that is another blow to the white race's survival, because our precious resource of a fertile woman has been diverted away from our race's survival and continuation. Homogeneous white communities don't have to worry about this, and even majority white countries generally marry between themselves. However, a majority non-white country will rapidly increase the number of white race mixers, simply because these are the men and women they find themselves around and thus get romantically involved with. Each new generation would subsequently be even more non-white. It will be more difficult each generation for a white to meet another white, that could give birth to a new white child -- and progressively easier for a white to meet a compatible non-white they fall in love with, and thus give birth to a non-white child. Sooner or later the last white line of descent would decide to marry a non-white, and the white race will die. The only way whites can survive as a race is to cut themselves off from non-whites, so that they don't race-mix. Non-whites are 90% of the world's population. If we mate randomly, instead of exclusively with other whites, the white race would lose 9/10 of its current population. The next generation would be 99% non-white and 1% white. If that group mated randomly, 99% of remaining whites on Earth would have non-white children, and only the white population of the world would become 1% of 1%, ie .01%. Repeat another generation of random, unsegregated mating and -- get it? The number of whites becomes infinitesimally low. It reaches zero.

Mass immigration is white genocide because it introduces non-white romantic partners to whites in an ever-increasing flood. At some point, somewhere down the long line of generations, every white will make the decision to marry and reproduce with a non-white, so long as the opportunity is easily available and the example constantly surrounds them. To make matters worse, the media and the government have glamorized and encouraged race-mixing, such that the white race will die off at an even more rapid rate than mere chance would indicate. Even more ominous is the looming thundercloud of forced racial integration for the sake of 'national harmony' or 'racial unity.' Does it sound crazy? Why? Liberals have been calling for the complete mixing of the white race into a 'coffee colored brown' for decades. They say it is the only final solution to racism, which is the greatest evil on Earth. Requiring that whites marry non-whites, when liberals think that whites and non-whites are interchangeable and only racism could justify not finding a perfect life partner among another race, is not especially onerous in their minds. Since everyone could still find a loving soulmate among members of another race, they aren't hurting anyone -- they're simply helping the country heal its divisions and ending the great evil of racism once and for all.

Once non-whites become the majority, we could be rounded up and killed via direct action. Or we could be forced to marry non-whites en masse. There's no telling what non-whites have planned for the white race once they are in power. Either path means our extinction.


4. Despair: There is one other way non-whites and mass immigration threatens the physical existence of the white race. They are killing our souls. Whites who live in cities have far lower birth rates than whites who live in the suburbs. Why? There are all sorts of reasons, like the economic cost (partially due to economic competition from non-whites) of buying a home large enough for a family within the confines of a city. But an unmentioned reason is the presence of diversity. Instinctively, whites feel like they are in occupied territory, a conquered and humiliated people. We know we are 'beta,' and the other races are our masters. That is why we can be fired or ostracized if we ever say anything or do anything to non-whites, but non-whites can get away with saying or doing anything to whites and still be respected and prosperous. Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Jeremiah Wright, and Louis Farrakhan can say or do anything, even incite mob murder, and get away with it. But whites can't drop cotton balls on a sidewalk without being expelled from our white-founded and white-funded universities.

Whites, being the 'betas' of the wolf pack that is our country, have less testosterone, or basically 'joy of life,' and look less prestigious to potential mating partners. The 'alphas,' the non-whites who enjoy societal privileges over us simply because they are non-white and we are the hated, detested, racist, evil, Nazi white race, look better to potential female mates than we do. Another reason whites are driven to despair is that they are forced to mouth politically correct lies, just like the soviets were forced to mouth communist lies, regarding race. These lies are so painful to voice, and guard against, day in and day out, they produce such a psychic strain, that whites turn to drugs and drink just to forget about it all. Russia is a psychically destroyed nation that had to live a lie a few decades too long. Their birth rate has never recovered, nor has their alcoholism or drug use rates gone down. Their freedom was too little too late. But who will give us freedom from political correctness so long as non-whites are in our midst? And how many whites despair and self-destruct within this strait jacket of lies, just like the Russians did under the Soviet Union?

This is just one example of how despair might work, however. How many other ways does despair depress our birth rates? Imagine a white who feels it's simply too dangerous to have children 'in this day and age.' That of course means, in an age where we're surrounded by feral, violent non-whites on all sides. Imagine a white who has been taught since birth that we are the 'cancer of human history' and therefore believes it is an act of virtue to not continue our race's existence, thus refusing to marry or have children? This act of virtuous despair is so tragic there are no words for it. People are instinctively happier, more confident, and more extroverted when surrounded by their own race. This is just scientific fact. Robert Putnam has well documented this in his book Bowling Alone. Whites who are happy, confident, and extroverted will have more chances to find someone they can marry and start a family with than whites who are depressed, despairing, and alienated. In this way, diversity is a silent killer, a silent sterilizer of the white race wherever it spreads.

The despair extends to the absolute mess non-whites make of the environment. Whites don't want to bring babies into the world when they are surrounded by loud boom boxes, gunshots, graffitti, litter, and all the other wonders of living among non-whites. They want a quiet, picturesque place that they can sing lullabies to their children in, while perhaps gamboling over wet green fields of lush grass and flowers. Whites create an environment wherein whites can raise their own children, but non-whites create environments wherein whites can't even bear the thought of having children or trying to raise them. Non-whites, as I've mentioned before, are completely inured to these difficulties, through their higher pain-tolerance, and will just have babies anyway -- crackhouse be damned. Whites couldn't have a child if they lived on the same block as a crackhouse -- blacks will have crack-babies. The difference is stark. Non-whites spread ennui, apathy, alienation and despair among whites. They are called names, humiliated, depressed, abused, and threatened, to the point that they just don't love life anymore. Whites who don't love life anymore, wouldn't be so cruel as to give life to a new generation of white children.

Non-whites, by lowering the quality of life of whites, lower the spiritual grace of whites. Whites with downcast spirits can't summon the energy or desire to carry out the most basic function of life: marry, reproduce, and raise the next generation. Non-whites are Soulcutter, from Fred Saberhagen's book of swords:

The Tyrant's Blade no blood hath spilled
But doth the spirit carve
Soulcutter hath no body killed
But many left to starve.

So much for white people's first mistake when it comes to thinking about mass immigration.

The second mistake whites make is that they think all humans are interchangeable parts and therefore their replacement by foreigners is meaningless and trivial. In this case, the death of the white race is meaningless, so long as it was finished off in a non-violent manner. Even if I can prove mass immigration inevitably leads to our extinction, I can't say this is a 'bad' thing until I prove whites' second mistake. Unlike what whites think, there are meaningful genetic differences between races. If one race replaces another, it will not be the exact equivalent -- it will be either superior or inferior to the race they just replaced. If that race is superior, fine. But if it's inferior, that shouldn't be fine. Life's goal is to evolve, not devolve. Why should we intentionally allow the future to be a worse place than the present? That's disgraceful.

All scientists agree that there are group-level genetic differences between the races. All scientists agree that intelligence is an emergent property of our brains, which is an emergent property of whatever genes code for how we build our brains from the fetus on up to adulthood. All scientists agree that higher intelligence leads to superior quality of life, for the individual and the nation as a whole. All scientists know that identical twins raised in different households have more closely correlated IQ scores than fraternal twins raised in the same household. This categorically requires that genes, not the environment, MUST be the primary determining factor regarding IQ.

However, there is still uncertainty when it comes to this debate because people do not know precisely what genes code for intelligence, or how they do so. It is into this gap of scientific knowledge that the anti-racists have inserted their lies, claiming that all gaps in IQ between the races are due to 'poverty' or maybe 'racism,' environmental conditions supposedly far harsher than those experienced by separated identical twins, rather than genetics. It is the exact same method that creationists argue against evolution, claiming that because darwinism hasn't completely explained the mechanisms behind every evolutionary step in life's history, we should instead believe in creationism. Racism as the ur-cause of everything is the same as God being the ur-cause of everything. No one ever needs to offer proof or evidence for these theories, they only argue negatively: "Since you can't absolutely prove evolution is true, Creationism is true," and "Since you can't absolutely prove what genes code for intelligence, Racism must be the cause of racial IQ differences."

Racism is never scientifically defined or quantified. People who experience a bad word or dirty look one time in their life can suffer a 15 IQ loss just as easily as people who saw a lynching or cross burning. Apparently, all degrees of racism equally reduce blacks by one standard deviation of IQ, no matter how harsh or light the racism was. In this anti-scientific manner, the anti-racists claim we don't have enough proof for our arguments, while giving the most absurd just-so stories, without any scientific methodology themselves, for every single topic we bring up.

The fact that people of non-European, non-East-Asian descent are genetically less intelligent cannot be proven until we discover the genes for intelligence and physically count them in the various races. This discovery will come sooner or later. With sequencing technology going down in price every year, we will eventually have a statistical sample of sequenced DNA so vast that even the most minute, subtle genes that affect intelligence will be identifiable. At this point, we can simply count which race has what intelligence genes, add them up, and definitively prove the genetic average intellect of each race. We can then show that there is a closer correlation between how many intelligence genes people have and their IQ scores than poverty or how racially oppressed people have been in their lives, and thus forever silence the 'talking points' of the lying side. This event can't happen soon enough. There are already multiple studies looking for these genes. The nail in the coffin will come -- in the next few years or decades, but definitely within our lifetime.

I need time to prove that whites' ideas about races being interchangeable are mistaken. But if we go ahead with mass immigration now, there won't be time to prove why such a course is such a terrible idea, by the time we discover mass immigration is wrong because the races aren't interchangeable, it will have already happened and doomed us all. Prudence dictates that mass immigration at least be ceased until this scientific inquiry can be completed. It is not just a 'given' that all peoples are interchangeable, it is almost CERTAIN that they are not. A few years, or tens of years, at most is all that is required. Surely people could spare the white race just a few more years, since we've been alive for tens of thousands of years as a unique genetic entity, to scientifically resolve the question of whether our unique genes 'matter' or not? What is the rush to kill us off for, on just a mere, unfounded premise that we are interchangeable? Shouldn't it be proven we're interchangeable, BEFORE a decision to genocide a group is made, rather than the current system that only by proving we aren't interchangeable do we have the right to CALL OFF a genocide already in process?

Since we are dealing in an issue of life and death, any scientific doubt should FAVOR the white race, not HARM it. The fact that scientific doubt on the issue has been manipulated to mean it's okay to genocide the white race off the face of the Earth shows our anti-racist opponents are not honest or fair dealers, and their intentions are far from benevolent.