I was right about the Maidan massacre:

https://the307.substack.com/p/how-a-false-flag-massacre-led-to

This article gives definitive proof that the Maidan Massacre, used as justification for the illegal overthrow of the freely and fairly elected pro-Russian President of Ukraine in 2014, was a false flag attack perpetrated by Ukrainian far-right activists, in the hopes of producing exactly the effect that it did produce.

The evidence was so overwhelming that the coup-government put the former regime police on trial and still couldn't secure a conviction.  The eyewitnesses in the trial all attested to the attacks coming from far-right Ukrainian sources.  It's practically unheard of to fail at a show trial when you've already become a Nazi dictatorship, but somehow Ukraine managed it.

The argument that Yakunovych's reign was illegitimate because he mass murdered innocent unarmed civilian protestors, and therefore it was okay to overthrow his government and put in a new, pro-Western government, against the will of the voters, is fully exposed as a complete lie.  With that understanding it suddenly becomes clear that the regions of Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk who refused to accept the coup-regime as their legitimate government were clearly in the right.  Why should they accept a Nazi overthrow of their elected government based upon a false flag massacre?  This then naturally flows to the next obvious understanding, that it was perfectly right and just to support Crimea, Donetsk and Luhansk's aspirations for independence and security from the terrorist coup-regime of Kiev.  Which means Russia did nothing wrong when it helped out its neighbors and saved them from this cruel fate.

Russia tried to compromise with the Nazi, terrorist coup-regime by giving Donetsk and Luhansk autonomy while staying part of Ukraine, but Ukraine duplicitously signed that agreement whilst planning all along to betray it after gaining sufficient military force to 'crush the rebels.'  Ukraine has openly admitted that they never planned to honor the Minsk accords and it was all a ruse, so that's not in question.

Russia only invaded Ukraine when it saw that all diplomacy had been exhausted because the other side were treacherous scum, on top of being Nazi terrorists who mass murdered civilians to achieve their political goals.  Who on Earth could blame invading a country in order to liberate it from treacherous Nazi terrorists?  How evil must a country be before you are allowed to invade it and topple its government?

Ukraine is the death capital of the world, with the highest death rate and the lowest birth rate on Earth.  It has mistreated its people more than Saddam Hussein did Iraq, Gaddafi did Libya, or Milosevic did Bosnia.  No other president bragged about shelling its own kindergartners, but Ukraine's president did.  If it's okay for the USA to intervene to stop evil dictators from oppressing their own people, then surely it is okay for Russia to do the same.  Under no moral system can these two principles 'it's okay when we do it but not when they do it,' coexist.  Even if you're some sort of sovereignty fanatic who thinks it isn't okay for any foreign country to ever intervene no matter how bad of a humanitarian catastrophe is occurring, there is no reason to react so one-sidedly against Russia while doing nothing to punish the USA and its allies.  Passing sanctions solely on Russia, or sending aid solely to Russia's opponent, or keeping solely Russia out of the Olympics and World Cup, makes no sense under this formula.  If you truly believe no one should ever intervene anywhere then prove it by punishing America first, who has done it far more often than Russia.  Then I'll believe you when you condemn Russia.