What do you do when the women of your country genocide your own country by boycotting the next generation? Isn't genocide a crime? The complete annihilation of the South Korean genome and culture is underway, but because women are doing it apparently that's okay. Well I don't think it's okay. In fact, I have a solution to South Korea's woes, which I've written about many times -- mandatory marriage of all women by the age of 20 and mandatory birth of 2 children by the age of 25. The death penalty for anyone who refuses -- conveniently the Nuremburg trials already established that the penalty for genocide was death so I'm in keeping with international law.
This is the obvious and only solution to the entire female sex boycotting life. As though the elimination of all life on the southern Korean peninsula weren't reason enough for this law, it's also obvious that men cannot be expected to defend a country from aggression or pay its taxes when they get nothing in return from the women they're paying and defending. Men are acting like castrated eunuchs in this country, unable to have sex, marry or reproduce. Completely cut off from the meaning and joy of existence. And yet they keep toiling on, fervently patrolling and drilling in case of war with North Korea or China, working long hours for what? For whom? What good little worker and soldier ants they are. The most pathetic men on Earth.
South Korea is the most dramatic example, but a new stat out of Japan says the same thing. Even the lucky men who get married in that country, the ones with some little chance at sex with a woman, 2/3rds of them have nearly sexless or sexless lives. Their marriages are in name only, on paper only. They get nothing out of the marriage, yet again the situation only suits women -- who get male funds and companionship but offer nothing to their spouses in return.
In the ideal world I spelled out, one of the 10 commandments, the most central laws of the land, were that spouses could not deny physical or emotional affection and loyalty to their spouse. You cannot have a marriage where women don't offer the central currency they are meant to offer in return for the security a male in their life gives, that isn't an equal deal. It isn't even remotely equal.
Now you can say that most Japanese are old so it makes sense they don't have sex -- but that's not true. Old men want sex too, and if married their only recourse is with their old wives. They have as much a right to that sex as young men with young wives. If women don't like it, too bad, men don't like paying for new shoes or fending off pit bulls for their wives, or mowing the lawn or visiting the in-laws, but they do all of that because they feel obligated to make their wives happy. Women must do things to make men happy too. This should be so obvious, this isn't a radical argument, every religious book details the duties wives have towards their husbands, it's common sense.
If men continue to allow democracy to get in the way of a new rule book (since women outnumber men this new law can never be implemented by vote) they and their nation will simply go extinct. Nations and cultures which still require women to marry and have children and have sex with their husbands will repopulate the Earth. There is no future where women retain these anti-life and anti-reason rights. One way or another these women will disappear. The only question is whether we want a mostly western enlightenment, white or Asian genome in the future, with slight amendments to address ridiculous aberrations of freedom gone wild, or full Afghanistan/Rwanda. Those are your choices. This nightmare hellscape of only 4% of women wanting to actually engage in the physical fundamentals of life is not a choice that can possibly last more than 100 years.
Meanwhile, The Legend of El Cid S3 was apparently cancelled, so all the websites saying it would begin airing on the 7th were out of date. So much for my fun February and my 10th favorite tv show. Now that the story is left hanging on a cliffhanger, I'll have to find another tv show to replace it with. I suppose Seinfeld will do, I did watch it in full and enjoyed it all those years ago.
No comments:
Post a Comment