There goes East Asia:

East Asia has also fallen to the wayside against white competition.  All that's left is Morocco from the non-white world.  Croatia beat Japan and Brazil slaughtered South Korea.  And yes, Brazil is white.  Their team is whiter than France's.

When it comes to peak athletics, the World Cup and the Olympics, whites stand alone.  They hog all the glory.  In fact, not a single non-white team has ever won the World Cup.  This World Cup had the same painful lesson for the world to bear: no matter how many chances you get or how high your population grows, you still can't beat little white countries like Croatia.  We're so far superior that no other advantages add up to anything.  Anyone can play soccer, it's a very cheap game to hold, so no excuses about 'differences in opportunity' hold water here.  Besides, Croatia and Brazil are poorer than Japan and South Korea.  Soccer is a combination of skill and athleticism and nothing else.  No expensive equipment, no specific body type, height and strength don't matter.  It's a contest of pure merit and when held whites always win.

The only argument you can make is that sports don't matter at all, but then you move into whites vs. everybody else in terms of Nobel Prizes or Fields Medals and, whaddyaknow, the exact same story plays out.  In any objective contest it will always be whites first, East Asians second, everybody else nowhere.

Japanese art is far superior to white art, but that's a 'subjective' contest where no objective parameters can be agreed upon.  I actually think East Asians are the best race simply because of Japan's entertainment industry, which produces hundreds or thousands of works equivalent to our very best (Star Wars, Firefly, Lord of the Rings, etc.)  When you're that outnumbered in terms of truly moving, inspiring, beautiful works of art it's time to throw in the towel.  But anti-racists don't value anime or video games so they can't actually make that argument.  By their standards whites win at everything, including art.  So who am I to argue?

I think technology is sufficiently simple to produce/advance that East Asians could handle the future fine without whites, so what really matters is who produces the best cultures, the best places for people to live in.  That, obviously, is Japan.  Peaceful, intact families, rich, free, beautiful and fun, there is nothing lacking in Japan.  It still holds to traditional morality while innovative enough to come out with dozens of new world accomplishment class artistic franchises and hey, they reached the top 16 in the World Cup, that's good enough.  Whites may have high specs, but they use all that talent to push world destroying ideas like war with Russia, stopping global warming, inverting every child's gender, legalizing drugs, no longer enforcing criminal law because it has a disparate impact on blacks, open borders, unleashing bioweapons on the world via 'gain of function' research, etc., so what good is their talent?  All they're talented in these days is destruction.  Japan and to a lesser extent Taiwan/China/S. Korea are talented at creation.  I know what matters more to me.

The era when whites were the best race in the world was from Ancient Greece until 1914.  Starting with World War I, whites stopped using their talent for creation and started on a long and glorious streak of destruction.  First they destroyed each other, and now they're trying to destroy the world.  The nuclear bomb is tick, tick, ticking as we speak.  I identify with the white tradition pre 1914, but I have nothing but disgust for whites post 1914.  They're a threat to the future of the species and life in general, they offer nothing to any future timeline.  The best thing they could do is kill themselves off more quickly so they don't come up with any more insidious, sinister schemes that might drag Japan down with them.

Meanwhile, I promoted 'Masquerade' by ClariS to 5-star, demoting 'Vector Industries,' an instrumental piece by Shinji Hosoe from Xenosaga 2 to make room.  I got tired of the beep-beep background beat in Vector after hearing it 170 times and this new vocal piece from Shadows House seems like just the thing to fill in the gap.

I also finished sorting my 3-star music into instrumentals and vocals.  The final tally was 401 vocal songs for a total of 1.1 days of playtime, vs. 699 instrumental songs for a total of 1.5 days, so just barely staying within the 600's like the previous two lists, and really no larger a gap of playtime than the 4-star was.  Vocal pieces held their own in this list too.  I don't think the 2-star and 1-star list will do as well because I believe vocal pieces are in general higher quality than instrumentals so they should be clustered nearer the top than the bottom, but we'll see.