In Russia we can see the future:
the States Statistic Service reports that as of 2020 73 percent of Russian marriages ended in divorce, with 48 percent divorcing before having children. But mainly the new national goal set out by Putin is hard to achieve because a significant number of Russian women—51 percent—simply don’t want to give birth.
So what happens to the 51% of men who wanted sons and daughters of their own but now, because 51% of women don't want to be bothered to do their one and only purpose in life, what their entire brains and bodies were designed for, their future is forever cut off? Do these people have no right to life? Does a country and a culture as a whole have no right to continue existing? Because Russia's birth rate is apparently 1.5 right now, but with half of all Russian women boycotting giving birth you can bet that number is going to keep sinking from here.
But perhaps even more disturbing than the end of life is the end of love. 73% of Russian marriages end in divorce. Half of those end so quickly you can't even get a girl pregnant first. This is ridiculous. This is laughable. You call that marriage? You have a 3/4 chance of being dumped after a few short years while still having no kids. Even if you miraculously did manage to have a kid, of course after the divorce the woman would get custody and you'd never see them again anyway.
So, over half of Russian men have zero chance, none at all, of reproducing, because over half of Russian women aren't interested in giving birth. Then 3/4 of the remainder also have no chance of having kids because either they're divorced before a child is born or after a child is born which makes no difference either way. I suppose there is some slight overlap between married Russian women and women who don't want children, but why on Earth would a man marry a woman who refuses to have kids? You promise to pay her for life in exchange for exactly nothing? The overlap, whatever it might be, is minimal. So let's assume it doesn't exist and do the math. In Russia you as a man have a 1/4 of 1/2 chance of having a kid = 1/8. One in 8 Russian men get to live the life God and Nature intended for them, designed for them, and instinctually rewarded them with happiness for living. The other 7/8 are shit out of luck.
No wonder all Russian men drink themselves into oblivion by age 60. What do they have to live for? They can't marry, they can't reproduce, even if they do (foolishly) marry all it means is they're instantly divorced and lose half their assets and have to pay alimony forever in exchange for nothing. If 3/4 of all men in Russia are betrayed by the person they love most in the world it's no wonder they're depressed.
This is a nightmare hellscape. I mock Americans for marrying when there's a 50% divorce rate, but here in Russia marriage has been honed to perfection, a 75% divorce rate and no kids so never a real marriage to begin with. For the Americans who figured a coin toss between heaven and hell was a worthwhile gamble, well now it's 75%, now you'd have to win two coin tosses in a row to get heaven while 3/4 of the time it's hell. Is that also worth risking?
And what happens when the divorce rate reaches 90%? 95%? What's to stop women? They seem to hate men so much that, given the chance, they always divorce and they never reproduce. Not even Elon Musk, Brad Pitt, Bill Gates or Kanye West was good enough. This is women's liberation all across the world. When will the trend reverse? In time for any men alive today to have any hope of anything? And by what mechanism will the trend reverse if no laws are changed? What will cause women to rethink their lives and decide to become loving brides and mothers again?
There is only one solution to this Russian dystopian future. Or the South Korean dystopian future. Or anywhere you look's dystopian future -- Mandatory marriage by age 20 and mandatory two children by age 25, with adultery and divorce of course banned. This is the only way to break the momentum of feminism and restore the universe to the sane moral and natural order of the past 10,000 years. Humanity cannot live like this. We are genuinely going extinct due to women's liberation. But perhaps more importantly Russian men are so sad that they simply cannot live under this regime. American men can't live either. What do you think the cause of the opioid epidemic is? Men who can't get women or children. It's always the same people dying and it's always the same people who are killing them -- renegade women who want to pretend to be something other than women and do something other than what women do.
For 10,000 years, all across the world, men and women found happiness and satisfaction within the boundaries of marriage and children and the world's population and civilization grew ever upwards. Then in 1950 we decided to abolish marriage and children in order to super-please women and now, other than women, everyone else on Earth is dead, dying, or unborn. Marriage is already a compromise we show women because we like women and don't wish them unhappiness. At any moment men could simply enslave all women across the Earth and force them to serve us, give birth to our children, or die. But instead, bizarrely, we live in a world where women have enslaved men, take our money as 'taxes' despite not giving birth or sex, and laugh as we perish in misery from alcohol or fentanyl, and all they had to do was ask. They didn't fight a war or risk their lives for this new world order. They never bested us in any competition. They asked for the right to screw us over so royally that all men's lives are hopeless at birth, and we gave it to them freely.
Why? Because of the moral theory of 'rights,' replacing 'utility.' Under a theory of 'rights,' women cannot be blamed for inaction. If they choose not to love a man, or not to keep loving a man after saying they will, or not to give birth to a child, or not to stay pregnant even if a baby is growing in their womb, or anything at all, so long as they're choosing not to do something that is their right. And indeed if there were such a thing as rights we would be required to honor women's 'choice' as they choose to destroy the world. In fact this could be used as a negative proof that 'rights' aren't an effective moral theory after all, since this is the inevitable result. But it's all imaginary. No one has rights. We live in a society. In order to coexist we must compromise. We must cooperate. Everyone has to do their part. We don't have rights. We have duties. Responsibilities. Yes, women too. Not just soldiers, not just men. Women too.
If men do their duty, which is to make a living and obey the law and fight off foreigners, they should have a right to wives and children (in abundance!).
And if women do their duty, which is to make a man happy and bear and raise his children, they should have a right to a loving husband, grateful children, protection and provision.
You do your duty first then you have a right. That's justice. That's also the only way humanity survives. You can stick with 'freedom' and 'rights' as your morality and die or you can switch to utilitarianism and justice and live. This isn't a difficult decision folks. . .
Honestly, I'm so sick of women. I'm 5'11" and weigh 170 lbs, which is less than the weight of the average white woman. (171 lbs. Non-white, non-asian women weigh even more) Do you realize what disgusting blobs they must be to weigh more than me at my height? These women have no virtue, no looks, no abilities (they consume more in taxes than they pay and most of their jobs are phony quota/government hires in the first place), they vote the wrong way, they're sluts, they're traitors, they're barren, they're detestable through and through. The greatest inventions in history will be the artificial womb and the artificial girlfriend. Male genius should be used to replace women entirely, since they are now completely and utterly useless to serve any end imaginable. The moment we make these inventions I promise to 'free' women to enjoy their 'rights' forevermore. No male will ever pay them any attention or any money again, so they can enjoy their 'freedom' to starve all they like on their own.
In other news, Kimetsu no Yaiba will be airing this fall. That part makes sense. What I don't get is it will also be airing this winter, ostensibly still covering the same arc the fall is covering. The arc is 30 chapters long, so even if you're lollygagging that should only take 15 episodes. If you wanted you could cover it in 10 episodes. So why on Earth does it plan on a 26 episode run? There's something amiss. The best explanation is it also secretly covers the next arc, the swordsmith village arc, which is 28 chapters long. Then it all mathematically fits together. But if that's the case, why not just announce that? Why pretend it's all the yukaku-hen?
I guess all we can do is wait and see. Best case scenario, we get an extra arc animated. Worst case scenario, we get oodles of filler that ruins even the arc we were originally promised. That's quite the wide range. . .
No comments:
Post a Comment