Blog Archive

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

The Moral Case Against Immigration:

If we do not have the power or the numbers to phenotypically express our genotype, by creating the environment our genes cry out for or shaping the world to resemble our inner spirits, we have effectively been eliminated, even if our bodies still walk around on the Earth. Even if our genes float around in the gene pool, we can no longer be ourselves, therefore we can no longer be. This is genocide, not by bullets, but by asphyxiation. A community needs a certain level of political power, cultural self-assertion, pride, territory and cohesion to express itself and its most cherished inner desires in the real world. Lacking these tools is like lacking oxygen. Depriving a community, a people, a race, of these tools is the same as depriving them of oxygen.

A white who can not express his genotype in the outside phenotypic world is like a caterpillar that can never transition to the next stage of his existence and become a butterfly. Caterpillars are technically alive, but the meaning of their existence has been robbed from them, the value of their existence has been robbed from them, and ultimately their ability to reproduce and secure their existence has been robbed from them. Turning a true nation of whites with a rich history, language and culture, like Germany or France, into a nation of white caterpillar grubs and larvae, surrounded and asphyxiated by cultural and genetic aliens, is genocide, no matter how cleverly and subtly the genocide is executed. All that matters is results. In the end death by asphyxiation and death by bullets reaches the equivalent end point.

The nations of Europe, North America, and Oceania we have considered permanent fixtures of the world are about to be completely and irrevocably wiped from the face of the Earth. Their names will remain, but the vitalizing force that gives them the character they have today will have been completely drained away. At some point a critical population threshold of non-whites, perhaps at 50%, perhaps at 90% of the population, will makes whites incapable of maintaining the culture, civilization, and way of life we take for granted today. Since I love the phenotypic expressions of these nations, I have no desire to eliminate them all and replace them with some mishmash of competing alien genes and cultures that have never shown themselves the equal of Europe's artistic, moral, physiological and technological greatness.

It is a tragedy to make rocks weep that the white race, who gave the world almost all of its good things, should go extinct right before it could find its freedom and safety in the stars. If even one majority white nation, anywhere on Earth, would give us a safe haven from mass immigration and mass asphyxiation, surely the world could spare us this much soil in thanks for all the inventions, all of the music, all of the economic empowerment we have shared with them. Is it too selfish, too greedy, too racist, to ask that even one nation of whites have the right to live and be itself in exchange for the billions of non-white lives we have saved and made possible through our discoveries in medicine, law, economics and agriculture?

Will no one grant us basic human rights, show any compassion, feel any gratitude, or display any twinge of conscience on our behalf? Is it fair for all white countries, and only white countries, to be the sole recipients of mass immigration and the sole race on Earth that is expected and demanded to become a vanishing minority in their own homelands? Is this justice? Is this compassion?

No comments: