Only 15 percent of young men today, 18 to 35 years of age, are married. Just over half of Americans between the ages of 18 and 34 — 51 percent of them — said they do not have a steady romantic partner, according to data from the General Social Survey released this week.
Another percentage of the population may technically be dating/married, but the woman is overweight, liberal (and thus pure evil), old, treacherous or obnoxious, and the experience is net negative. These aren't the winners of the dating world, they're the biggest losers of all.
The only experience these men can have with regards to one of the most fundamental aspects of human existence -- love and sex, the beauty of the female form, romantic coupling, bonding, falling in love -- is through anime, manga and visual novels, ie 'porn' according to Andrew Anglin. He wants to deprive the vast majority of men of one of the greatest joys in life and one of the most redeeming aspects of modernity.
In their place he offers nothing. A vast gaping hole. He offers no hope for how these men could get into a relationship or get married, and in fact counsels against interacting with women on any basis. He just wants to eradicate an entire sector of the human brain and the emotional spectrum like a lobotomist.
This is the very definition of a pied piper. His advice would lead only to depression, despair and death.
Instead, I believe in men's liberation. We should make our own sexual and romantic partners and our own children through the power of technology. For now that means visual novels and surrogacy. In the future it could be artificial intelligence robot partners, virtual reality girlfriends, and artificial wombs. The more men get serious about this issue, the more money and smarts invested into it, the faster the future will come. But already, in the present, men's liberation offers men all the honey of life with none of the drawbacks. Andrew Anglin, alternatively, wants to ban all hope and joy and make this the last generation of mankind. I thought he was joking when he started hoping for nuclear annihilation, but I guess he's serious. When you start attacking the reproductive instinct you've gone full nihilist.
Asexuals are not praiseworthy or admirable figures. Not being attracted to women is only one step away from homosexuality or transexuality. Normal, healthy men should have and should enjoy normal, healthy heterosexual appetites. Why would a traditionalist try to disrupt this God given instinct that's seen humanity through for thousands of years of happiness and fruitfulness?
In general, right wing extremists need to stop giving personal reformation advice. The problem is not with the individual. If it were the individual, it wouldn't be the vast majority of Americans all experiencing the same problem, all of a sudden, all at the same time, for the first time in human history. In the 1800's the average man in America had eight children. They were no better than us. They were short, lower IQ, illiterate, drank, smoke, regularly beat their wife and kids, practiced slavery, believed in silly fairy tales, went to war at the drop of a hat, etc, etc. They no more deserved wives and children than the men who can't get anyone today. This isn't about staying in shape, avoiding sinful habits, going to college, getting good grades, approaching women with 'game,' or any other guru advice. It is a systemic, system wide toxic environment.
In the current system, due to overpopulation, worldwide interconnectivity and automation, good jobs are extremely scarce, which makes it difficult to 'establish' yourself as a family provider. It also makes it hard to have children who you believe could reasonably succeed in this environment as well, which means reproducing willy-nilly would be irresponsible.
Women are responding to these real issues by becoming providers themselves, which creates a vicious cycle in that instinctually they are repulsed by men lower than themselves, so the higher they climb up the career ladder the less men they could possibly love.
And then on top of these technological, unavoidable changes, we have this toxic liberal culture which preaches to women to actively hate men, avoid love and marriage and children, divorce, abort, go gay, get a sex change, do drugs, etc, etc. This preaching occurs everywhere -- in churches, in schools, in universities, on tv, in the movie theaters, the newspapers, everywhere, everywhere you turn. They are saturated in this anti-marriage sludge from the day they're born. To make matters worse, women are especially conformist and feel anxious and unsettled whenever they find themselves in an ideological minority.
It isn't a man's fault if he can't find a marriage partner in a world like this. There is no personal advice or guru lifestyle change he can undergo to make things better. Obviously becoming rich, high status, famous, powerful, etc, won't hurt. For anyone who can do that, more power to ya, but remember, even Brad Pitt and Elon Musk are constantly divorced and losing parental rights.
Men's liberation sidesteps the entire issue by getting what you need without the need of anyone else's consent (which will never happen so there's no point even trying anymore). If you interact with fantasy girls they can't say 'no.' If you hire surrogates, all you need is money and the child is yours for life. No one can take that experience from you. It is the only practical solution in the modern world.
The other solution is to form a new country with mandatory marriage laws, creating by force the circumstances necessary for love, marriage and children, and eliminating the toxic liberal culture which turns women away from it from the cradle onwards. With the liberal brainwashing gone, marriage a fact of life, women's conformist attitudes would reinforce marriage instead of undermining it. We could harness that natural pliancy in our favor, and then everything would change.
This new nation would also ban immigration so there wouldn't be overpopulation. There is no stopping trade or technology (if you did the neighboring countries would just conquer and annihilate you just like what happened to the Amerindians or other primitive cultures so there's no point even trying), but trade and technology alone isn't enough to spoil our God-given instincts towards love and family formation. It's the toxic combination of trade, automation, liberal brainwashing and overpopulation that's driving us to extinction. Yes, automation may present a headwind to family formation, but it's nothing a mandatory marriage law couldn't overcome. In a new nation dedicated to marriage any anti-marriage sentiments would be swamped by pro-marriage sentiments and marriage would take the field.
It would require millions of devotees to initiate the project. They could all be men -- not a problem -- with surrogacy the nation would have as many women as men want soon enough, this time correctly raised to have conservative values. There just needs to be enough numbers to create a viable economy, espirit de corps, and military strength that others have to take us seriously.
There are millions of us right now, all reading Daily Stormer right now, but they aren't being gathered together to form a new nation which would solve all our problems. Instead they are being told that we must accept a non-white American future and battle on the edges of marginal policy reforms like opposing gay marriage or reducing H-1B visas. Andrew Anglin recently admitted straight out that if he got his way America would remain full of non-whites and we'd all just have to get along with each other in a multicultural mishmash. This isn't a recipe for survival. It's the voice of exhaustion, of despair, of surrender. If we aren't one people we can't possibly enforce a united ethos, logos or pathos. We have to be one race and one culture and one belief or 'we' aren't anything. We'll be so busy infighting that even the solvable problems will be unsolvable.
The moment we became one united people (and race is a binding tie stronger than any other, and thus a necessary component of unity), we could take all that excess energy that used to be spent infighting in America with our enemies and dedicate it instead to investing in our future. First would be family formation, then prosperity, artistic excellence, scientific innovation, and lastly the stars. We should have gone fifty years ago, but we were bogged down by diversity. A new nation would take us there. The infinite deep, where overpopulation is impossible and enemies can never hurt us again.
Anything short of a new nation won't take us anywhere. The moment you give up on white nationalism, you've given up on a united people following a united, new, legal and philosophical code. Which means you've given up on the future. Andrew Anglin is just hoping to muddle through life in the America of today, taking what wins he can and accepting our losses as inescapable. It's impossible to form a family in America today? Okay, don't even feel attracted to women whatsoever. Surrender. It's impossible to stay a white majority? Okay, don't even try to stay white. Live among non-whites and get along.
Millions of potential revolutionaries full of life and passion and soul, wanting to be and do the right thing, are being told to give up and muddle through. His posts are enervating. His life one of sardonic, wry acceptance of defeat.
Right now, personally, via men's liberation, people can still succeed in life, right now, in the America of today, needing nothing outside of their own agency to change.
There is no reason to despair or give up on anything good in life.
And right now, there are sufficient people of good character and quality ability that we could come together and form a new nation which could become utopia. There is nothing stopping us except despair itself. Except Andrew Anglin's bad advice!
No comments:
Post a Comment