A couple weeks ago, a string of murders in Texas were ascribed to the evil 'white supremacist' Aryan Brotherhood gang. It turned out to be utterly false, with a coworker striving for promotion to be the actual culprit, but the press still ran 'white supremacist terrorists' for weeks in the headlines so their attack has already succeeded.
The absurdity of this libel has so many parts. Not only were the Aryan Brotherhood innocent of the deed, but the Aryan Brotherhood isn't in any sense a political movement, but simply a prison gang that unites around race to defend itself (because you can bet hispanic and black prisoners unite around race to attack other prisoners inside prison, in which case who else can you rely on as a white prisoner but the other odd men out?) If the Aryan Brotherhood is engaged in a string of murders, it is precisely because they're a gang of criminals, it has absolutely nothing to do with any political ideology. Even supposing they were 'white supremacists' in abstract, it would have been irrelevant and had nothing to do with their murder spree. Why would a white supremacist kill prosecutors? Prosecutors are a white supremacist's best friend -- they put oodles of black and hispanic males behind bars where they no longer pollute our streets or our gene pools. The last person a white supremacist would kill on Earth is a district attorney.
A white supremacist terrorist would at the very least be targeting non-whites for random murders. If he wished to be a little more cerebral about his activities, he would target liberal spokesmen for the other side -- for instance Tim Wise who is always mouthing off about how evil whites are. He would make clear what the other side's crimes were and why white supremacist ideals require the sinner to be judged accordingly. Anything short of this isn't a 'terror' attack, it's just a routine crime, with no motive except the wish to kill and destroy, much like every other criminal on Earth.
A perfect example of this is J.T. Ready. J.T. Ready was a troubled man who got a dishonorable discharge from the military, joined a Neo-Nazi group, and finally got tired of it all and murdered his entire family and then himself. How exactly were his 'white supremacist' beliefs related to his murder of four other whites, including a white infant girl named Lily? J.T. Ready's Nazism is no more relevant than his Mormonism in a case like this, and yet it was still constantly referred to in the headline discussions of his crime. Apparently, if any criminal has politically incorrect beliefs, even beliefs that directly say you should not kill fellow white people, your politically incorrect beliefs are still the cause of your crime, according to the media.
When crazy killers Adam Lanza and James Holmes went on their mad sprees, they were immediately framed as 'white supremacist terrorists.' American Renaissance was somehow blamed as the ringleader of the murders. This despite the fact that in both cases they were indiscriminately killing white children, the very antithesis of the 14 words -- 'we must secure a homeland for our people and a future for white children.' As it turned out, neither of them were remotely related to any racist ideology, nor would it have mattered if they were, because they were clinically insane and not thinking rationally in the first place. The same is true of Anders Breivik. Certified insane, it shouldn't matter what his ideology is because insane people do insane things regardless of what ostensible beliefs they hold inside their head. But even assuming he was sane, he was not a white supremacist terrorist. Breivik went to a summer camp in Norway and killed eighty kids, almost all of them white children. This is absolute madness. How does this support the 14 words? How is this in line with pro-white ideology of any type? If Breivik has to be identified with some sort of ideology, you could call him an 'anti-liberal'. He hated and detested liberals so much that he went and murdered a bunch of kids in a liberal summer camp where they were being trained to become the next political leaders of the Labor party. If he were truly anti-muslim, he would have targeted Muslims for mass murder, not white children, so I don't think he even deserves that ideology as a title. But there is no white supremacist on Earth who designates white children raised to be liberals by the entire social system, education system, parents, media, etc, as legitimate targets for mass murder because they ascribe to the wrong views about immigration or race. Harold Covington, violent Nazi rhetorician extraordinaire, over and over stressed that children of any race were not legitimate targets of terrorism. White supremacists want to save these children from the bad influences leading them down the wrong path, and want to shield these children from the harm non-whites inevitably cause them after immigrating in to to be their neighbors. The entire movement was founded for the sake of white children.
The Oklahoma City bomber was not a white supremacist terrorist, because he murdered white children. He set up a giant truck bomb at a giant daycare center for God's sake! In Oklahoma City, a city chock full of whites, he decides to blow up a daycare center full of white babies to protest Bill Clinton's violent crackdowns on other 'out of mainstream' groups like the Branch Dravidians. This may be described as a 'Constitutionalist' or a 'Patriot' or something, but what kind of 'white supremacist' kills other whites, specifically targeting innocent white babies, in order to lodge a protest against the government? How is it possible that every single 'white supremacist terrorist' in the news specifically targets white babies like a homing missile? You would think that if they truly cared about white people, they could have found an effective way to launch a terror attack that did not primarily affect the people they loved most. That their targets always involve white children proves the white race is not their highest priority and therefore they are not white supremacists by definition.
Humorously, the only 'terror rampage' that fits what an actual 'white supremacist terrorist' would look like -- a string of murders of random blacks in Tulsa in retaliation for a string of black-on-white murders in Tulsa -- was perpetrated by an American Indian. He apparently was fed up with the black race and took matters up into his own hands, without ever once reading about Nazi ideology or the Bell Curve. I do not believe a single, actual 'white supremacist' terror attack has occurred in decades, despite being blamed for every single crime in America.
And now we come to the Boston Marathon bombers. Ludicrously, the media immediately blamed 'white supremacist terrorists' for a bombing that, yet again, killed an eight year old white child. The bomb was ignited in Boston, a white city, during a marathon, a Stuff White People Like event, in a crowd brimming over with white onlookers. How retarded would a white supremacist terrorist have to be to decide this was the best target in America to bomb? Couldn't he have set the bomb off in L.A., Baltimore, Detroit, or St. Louis or somewhere? Before the media accuses white supremacist Nazis of attacks, shouldn't they at least try to make some sort of logical leap where these terrorists would first have some motive to have done the attack they are accused of?
In fact, the bombers were the usual suspects, Muslim jihadist Chechen immigrants who shouldn't have even been allowed into America in the first place. Just like the 9-11 hijackers, who were all allowed to immigrate into America legally before perpetrating their terrorist attacks, we have kept the floodgates open to Muslim immigrants and invited in terrorists from all over the world to come and do harm to us. After 9-11, Muslim immigration to America actually increased instead of decreased. Under the current mad American government, Islam is a religion of peace and Chechnya is even more peacefully Muslim than all other Muslim lands, and therefore these immigrants were both cream of the crop diversity enrichers. Just like we didn't learn from the original Islamic terror attacks, we won't learn from this Islamic terror attack either, and we will continue to insist that Islam, whose holy book reads, and I quote, "Slay the infidel wherever you find him," is a religion of peace, and that Islam had nothing to do with the terror attacks that went off a few days ago.
It turns out that 'white supremacism,' far from being the cause of these terrorist attacks, would have been the solution. If white supremacists had power, this terror attack never would have occurred, because Muslim Chechen terrorists wouldn't have been allowed to immigrate into America in the first place. In fact, white supremacists' very purpose for being is to protect white people from non-white scum like this. It is why the ideology was born in the first place, and it is the entire motivation and goal of the ideology in the long run -- a country free of black criminal thugs, Hispanic drug gangs, Muslim terrorists, Jewish calumniators (like David Sirota), and so on, where white people can be themselves -- safe, free, without constantly being shamed or guilted about all things diverse, where they aren't actively discriminated against in college admissions, hiring, and promotions, where no lawsuits can be brought against them for hiring who they felt was best for the job, where people can tell the truth without losing their jobs, where neighborhoods don't go bad and property values don't plummet, where taxes are low and wages are high, where everyone gets along because everyone is on the same page, where people can be proud of themselves and their heritage, where education supports white pride instead of undermines it by telling the truth about our great ancestors who invented every good artistic and scientific innovation on Earth and spread their vastly superior culture and technology all across the world, enriching billions of non-whites and literally saving them from starvation out of our own beneficence.
How many false accusations are going to be made about 'white supremacist terrorists' before they ever actually ask white supremacists who they are, what they want, and why they want it? How many times must whites be framed for crimes they didn't do, that don't make logical sense for why they would do them, before justice is demanded and the other side is given a voice?
No comments:
Post a Comment