Why is it that people in Europe, constrained by all sorts of hate speech/holocaust denial laws, are able to speak freely on subjects Americans dare not touch, who have full constitutional protection for everything they say?
For instance, Denmark released a series of cartoons that mocked Muhammed, one showing Muhammed with a bomb in his turban. American newspapers and tv shows were unwilling to show the cartoons, even while reporting the rioting the Muslim world was engaged in over them.
Russia Today interviews people like Jared Taylor and Paul Craig Roberts, people the American media shuns.
When Ahmadinejad made a speech in the UN that simply mentioned that many people, not even himself, thought 9/11 was an inside job, all the American news corporations suddenly cut the feed and refused to let people listen to his point of view.
When Laura Schlessinger tries to explain to a caller that without being told the context of when her caller's husband's friends were saying 'nigger,' it was impossible to judge whether they were racist or not, considering blacks call themselves that all the time, she was shoved off the airways.
Solzhenitsyn's final work, '200 Years Together,' concerning the history of jewish-russian relations, has never been translated into English. It was translated into French, it's just that Americans are not allowed to read it. Solzhenistyn, the winner of the Nobel Prize for literature, and one of the greatest moralists of the 20th century, is apparently too bigoted and too full of 'hate speech' to be given a voice in America.
When James Watson says liberals assume all racial IQ's are the same, but all test scores say 'that isn't so,' he's fired from his job at the Cold Harbor lab he himself created. Even a nobel prize in biology is not enough authority to be allowed to speak on the subject of race and IQ, if it disagrees with political correctness.
And when Rick Sanchez says the exact same thing that Joel Stein says, that jews own the media, he is fired, while no one bats an eye at Joel Stein's article. Let's be clear about this. It is an indisputable fact that jews are the owners/CEO's of ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, Time magazine, the New York Times, Newsweek, and many other news outlets. Virtually the only important media they don't own is Rupert Murdoch's Fox News and his Wall Street Journal. Liberals constantly denounce these outlets as hateful and try to silence or fire their popular hosts, like Glenn Beck and Bill O'Reilly. Liberals have also attempted to pass laws specifically aimed at stopping Rush Limbaugh from being able to air his show on the radio. What media the jews don't own, they try to silence with every method available, from boycotts to legislation. Does this mean jews 'control' the media? I guess this is still up to personal judgment.
If you think jews own the media, but do not control it, because they are not influencing what is being reported but are being completely objective and unbiased, then jews don't 'control' the media. For jews to 'control' the media, they would have to be elevating some people and situations above their merit, and devaluing other people and situations below their merit. For those who like the reporting on ABC, NBC, CBS, the New York Times, and so on, they don't feel that any incorrect decisions were made. Nor do they feel that these incorrect decisions were made on the basis of the jewish owner's jewishness. Nor do they think that jews have any particular ethnic agenda which they are using media power to advance. Therefore it's nonsense, pure conspiracy theory, to say jews 'control' the media. For jews to 'control' the media, there would have to be some sort of monolithic jewish block that is putting out total propaganda and lies, while shielding Americans from the truth, all in order to advance some sort of monolithic, agreed-upon Jewish agenda. From this point of view, no one is fired for naming the Jew because they got too close to the truth for comfort, a truth that needs to be hidden from Americans and never spoken of publicly, they are fired for naming the jew because the statement is so crazy, so idiotic, so wrong that anyone who says it no longer deserves to be listened to or employed by anyone.
From this point of view, no one is punished for discussing jewish control of the media, they are punished for being lunatics, idiots, and inflammatory liars. If they had said some other lunatic, idiotic, inflammatory lie on air, like the moon is made of green cheese that the CIA set up in the 1960's to poison the water supplies of inner cities, they would have been fired for that too. No one is protecting the jews, or giving special treatment to the jews. It just so happens that most lunatic, idiotic, inflammatory liars seek out the jews like heat-seeking missiles to expel their lunatic raving fury on. The proximate cause of their firing was what they said about jews, but the ultimate cause was their own stupidity and insanity.
If, on the other hand, you feel that jews are a monolithic block intent on advancing their own, agreed upon monolithic jewish agenda through the power of the media, by silencing people of merit and promoting people without merit, then there is nothing wrong with reporting the factual, self-evident truth that jews 'control' the media as well as 'own' the media. I belong to this second group. All the conditions for the statement, 'jews control the media,' have been cleared.
Here's my evidence. 80% of jews voted for Obama. Jews are a monolithic block in their beliefs and politics. They are the most liberal group in America, and the secret power behind liberalism in general, providing all the best opinion-makers, all the money, and a hugely disproportionate share of the politicians for the Democratic party. Jews make up 1/3 of the supreme court, and America has around 11 Jewish senators, all Democrats, which is five times as high a population as their population in the general public. It would be absurd to claim Jews aren't monolithic, at least the powerful jews who concern us on the 'far-right,' when all 3 of these Supreme Court justices and all 11 of these Senators are liberals who always side with the left. That's not just monolithic, that's unanimous. Powerful jews form a monolithic block for the left.
Next, all jews share the same monlithic interest. They did not get together in a secret cabal to spell out the jewish agenda and put their conspiracy to a vote. They all independently came to the same conclusion about what they, as jews, wanted to see happen. This monolithic ethnic interest was very simple, prevent Shoah II.
Jews, you see, don't want to die. They don't want their families to die. They don't want their race/ethnicity to die. So they all, independently, derived a specifically jewish agenda, which is, stop the targeting and mass murder of jews. This is different from being against murder, or mass murder, in general. Jews have no real interest in preventing communist massacres, or black crime, or other killers who don't target jews. But they become extremely interested and motivated in stopping any killer, or any would-be-killer, who seems interested in the topics that lead back to the jews. This includes all nationalists, all racists, all Christians, all Muslims, all fascists, and who knows who else. Jews have an especially sensitive sense of smell and they can detect, from light years away, any ideology that might threaten Jews with another pogrom. They have a keen sense of and knowledge of History, know that all sorts of different groups and different avenues always come to the same conclusion to kill all the Jews, from Cossacks to Catholics, and they are ever-vigilant to 'nip that sort of thing in the bud.' This is the jewish ethnic agenda. In order to guarantee their survival, they will nip all movements that might in the future, or have in the past, ever threatened Jewry. Since almost the entire world has hated jews and attempted to massacre them from the beginning of time, Jews are basically eternally at war with all other races and all other ideologies on Earth. They are the outsiders continually at war with the whole world, and there can be no compromise -- either all other ideologies must be squelched or Jews will be immolated in a new Shoah as sure as water is wet.
Jews can't be blamed for their survival instincts. What they can be blamed for is their behavior that led to the whole world's universal hatred, and oppression, of jews. Their treachery against their host nations, their strange manners and habits that distinguished them from their neighbors, their clannishness that refused to out-marry or assimilate, their usurious interest rates, their willingness to engage in despicable acts, like pimping, for money, their pandering to the powerful at the price of the peasantry, and recently, their backing of evil movements like Communism, Freudianism, and Boazian Egalitarianism. They can also be blamed for embarking on a project to destroy the whole world just to preserve themselves. Their selfish desire to live comes at too heavy a price. Squelching all groups and all ideologies that might threaten jews is too broad an attack, it's little different from genociding the entire rest of the world in a 'pre-emptive strike of self-defense.' This level of paranoia is unacceptable. Taking reasonable measures to avert the most dangerous precursors of a new Shoah in a limited, directed fashion is one thing, but suppressing any speech about anything, even topics completely removed from Jews, like Muslim religious beliefs or black crime rates, is going too far.
Furthermore, it is impossible to grant Jews their wish to be immune from criticism so long as they are so rich and powerful in the modern world. Jews want to be immune from criticism because criticism might lead to Shoah II. But those who criticize jews are doing so as a necessity to avoid the horrible plans jews have in store for them. Jews want a completely mongrelized, socialist, individualist world where whites have long since ceased to exist and been replaced by some sort of 'coffee-colored, color-blind' love and peace hippy-dom. Every day they are using their powerful positions in the economy, the media, and the government to enact this dream. If we cannot criticize them, we cannot oppose them, which means they will achieve their dream by default. The inability to criticize jews directly leads to the genocide of the white race. Meanwhile, jews think the ability to criticize jews directly leads to the genocide of the jewish race. Obviously one or the other of us has to give. Obviously the best solution for this issue is separation, where jews no longer have to live in fear of their white neighbors, and we will be unable to round them up and gas them since they are no longer within our state boundaries, and whites no longer have to fear the economic, media, and political power of jews, because they will no longer have any influence on what happens within our own borders. But so long as we don't separate, whites will have to continue opposing jews, and getting other people to oppose jews, until they bend on this jewish dream of white genocide. This is non-negotiable.
The third element to jewish control of the media, (I have covered the fact that jews all have one monolithic belief, liberalism, and that jews are advancing a specifically jewish agenda, prevent Shoah II), is that the media lies. It squelches news that hurts their agenda, and promotes news to unreasonable levels that helps their agenda. I have ample evidence for this case too. Complete non-entities, like Guy Harrisson and Richard Nisbett, are allowed to publish their anti-racist, egalitarian nonsense, but real scientists like Rushton, Jensen, Lynn, and Murray are shunted aside or demonized. This is the absolute foundation, the Big Lie that the media uses to distort our world. Jews refuse to publish the scientific findings on race and intelligence due to their particular jewish agenda, the fear of giving people genetic grounds for discrimination (which might someday lead to discrimination against jews because of their distinct genetics.) Another example of jewish bias in reporting is their reporting of crime news. When a gay or a black is killed due to a hate crime, the media goes into a frenzy of week long reporting and hand-wringing about the growing tide of 'hate' in America. But when a white is killed in a hate crime, like the horrendous murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom (The Knoxville Horror, let's try to keep this in our memory even though it's been years, such a terrible death and the media cover-up involving it should never be forgiven.), the national media is completely silent. Not a single NBC/ABC/CBS story on the rape, torture, mutilation, and murder of two innocent white college kids out on a date who had never met the blacks who killed them before. This is in line with the thousands of black on white, or hispanic on white, rapes and murders that are never reported, because they weren't motivated by 'hate' and therefore don't matter to jews, but certainly do matter to the victims of black and hispanic crime. Our crime reporting is so censored and biased, that it no longer even mentions the race of the criminal and the race of the victim, unless it is a white on minority crime, in which case the race issue is talked about front and center all day every day.
Another instance of media bias is the favorable reporting in America towards Israel. Israel is a pariah state that most of the world, including Europe, despises. But you wouldn't believe that if you followed the US media. Here, Israel is always supported no matter what they do, whether it's killing a thousand civilians in Gaza because two of their troops were kidnapped, or killing ten blockade runners because they were trying to bring non-violent supplies to the Gaza Strip. Israel can duplicitously engage in peace talks on one hand, while actively building settlements against UN resolutions on the other, and the American media doesn't bat an eye. Even the sheer amount of attention given to Israel is bias, in and of itself. If Israel were treated properly, it would be given as much news coverage as Armenia or Bulgaria or some other flyspeck country. Instead, at least an hour out of every day is devoted to discussing who did what to whom in Israel. "2 people injured due to tripping over the stairs in Israel today" is treated like urgent, breaking news in the American media. Obviously the only explanation for this level of interest is that jews care more about Israel than the rest of the world and can never get enough news about their homeland.
Jews controlling the media might not be a big deal if only jews were on our side. Instead, jews hate us and want us dead. This is the only explanation for the names they call us, and their agenda to 'abolish the white race' which they have called 'the cancer of human history.' Their calls for mass immigration all have to do with removing the last chance for a 'white, nazi based political party coming to power in the United States,' and have nothing to do with our own economic or spiritual well being. Jews want one thing, to forever break the back of white power, in whatever form -- cultural, religious, political, or economic -- so that we can never threaten them again. They feel America especially belongs to them, since it has the most jews in the world, and therefore in America especially, nothing can be said that threatens a new Shoah. Jews control the media to promote the hatred and genocide of whites -- those who say anything against this agenda are silenced via the same Jewish control of the media. They use their multitudes of media outlets to shape popular opinion, who never get to hear the other side in a calm and rational, fully contextualized and explained manner, so that anyone who says anything against the jewish agenda is first demonized, ridiculed, and ostracized, then fired from any prominent job so that he no longer has the power to oppose jewish power.
People like Thilo Sarazhin are some of jewry's scalps. Thilo Sarazhin is a realist, he says Jews all share a specific genetic profile, which millions of genetic scatterplots have already shown to be true. He also says that Muslims are bad for Germany because they are too stupid, poor, violent, and unassimilable to be an acceptable replacement for native Germans. This goes too close to Shoah II, Thilo Sarazhin "knows too much." The knowledge that jews are a genetic group, distinguishable from whites, and that some minorities are inferior to whites, is so close to Shoah II, it only takes a few more steps to the gas chambers. Therefore Thilo Sarazhin was demonized in the press and fired from his job as a Central European Banker. However, Thilo Sarazhin was a champion of ordinary whites and was attempting to defend his homeland, Germany, and his people, his kin, from a muslim invasion and takeover which is destroying Germany as we speak. He was a good man, a hero, a hero in any other age, that jews have now made into an unemployed villain. This isn't right. Whites should stop letting our own heroes be savaged and destroyed by jews. To do that, we need to reclaim control of our institutions of power -- both our economic ones, so that jews can no longer fire anyone, and our media ones, so that jews can no longer convince other people to fire enemies of the jews, but heroes of our own folk. Alternatively, we need to assimilate jews into whites so that even if jews control all our institutions, it is as whites, and in ways that benefit whites, rather than as outsiders, and in ways that disarm and destroy us. Alternatively, we need to separate from jews so that they can no longer have any influence whatsoever on the future of the white race. There are tons of non-violent, peaceful, simple solutions to the Jewish Problem. But no one can speak because jewish power is so complete that we'll all lose our status, our friends, our money, and our jobs if we say the tiniest little peep. Look at Rick Sanchez, he said Jews are bigoted against non-liberals, they don't treat our concerns or rationale seriously, but instead just dismiss us out of hand as 'ignorant' and 'hateful.' This is obviously true. He went on to say that jews are not an oppressed minority, and are in fact some of the most powerful people in America. This is also obviously true. But he was fired within one day of saying his comments. He is now groveling in apology for what he said, not even man enough to stick to his guns. The same as James Watson, and Laura Schlessinger, and so many other cowards. First they lose their reputations and jobs, then they lose their dignity with their groveling, lying apologies for finally saying what they really thought for once in their lives.
How I despise cowards! Their apologies justify the treatment meted out to them, and undermine others who would like to stand up for and defend them, and overthrow the jewish stranglehold on our freedom of speech. Every time someone apologizes for telling the truth, the truth dies a little in the human soul. White cowards and jewish tyrants are equally to blame.
We need someone who speaks truth to power without apologizing and without temporizing and without backing away. Someone who cannot be moved by public disapproval or economic concerns. We don't need just 'someone' like that. We needs lots of them. Millions of white warriors who do not cower in the face of the enemy. White lions. With that, we could regain true freedom of speech, not just our legal right to say what we want, but our right to be heard, without being unfairly demonized, ostracized, or penalized through the losing of our job for telling the truth. If enough people stick together and say 'no more of this crap,' the ostracism, and the economic penalties, would wash away. The millions of whites could support each other and be immune to the baneful attention of their jewish enemies. But so long as we stay this cowering, groveling Rick Sanchez types, nothing will ever be done.
No comments:
Post a Comment