http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/left-right/how-to-win-whistleblowing/
"To understand why your actions will be so devastatingly effective, we begin by acknowledging that America as we know it is not salvageable.
Its demographic and financial burdens are insuperable and will mean hyperinflation within the next few years with crackup to ineluctably follow. What is worth fighting for is not the United States per se, but the chance to define the ideological conversation in the aftermath."
"In the rubble of what was America, men with nothing to lose will be able to speak freely for the first time in decades …"
So you heard it folks. The most respectable, mainstream proponents of white advocacy are absolutely certain that America is not salvageable, that our burdens are insuperable, there will be hyperinflation within the next few years and America will fall apart and cease to exist inevitably and soon thereafter. America at this time will apparently be reduced to rubble as well. But, the good news is, we'll all be able to speak 'freely' at the time!
Where should I start with this argument? A) If we are doomed then there's no point worrying any further about the future. B) No one likes to listen to downers and pessimists, it just brings us down with them. C) These people are going to look ridiculous in a couple years when hyperinflation hasn't occurred. And no, 10% inflation is not hyperinflation. Hyperinflation is Zimbabwe. D) These people underestimate America, and by showing their contempt for such a venerable country and such a capable people, subtly show they cannot love Americans and thus have no right to lead America. E) It is obvious that this writer is more interested in his chance to 'speak freely' than distressed by the pain and suffering of an entire continent (and in fact the whole world would collapse if America collapsed, due to global trade) being reduced to 'rubble.' IE, the writer is a sociopath.
There is no more respectable group, no 'better' spokesmen for the movement. American Renaissance rarely actually says anything, preferring to retreat behind useless academic historical research and news links to other people. Vdare is fully onboard with the 'collapse chorus' and publishes numerous writers who talk of doomsday regularly. For instance, Donald Collins in a recent post complained about the rising tsunami of world population growth drowning us all. I agree that world population is overshooting sustainability, but again the threat is magnified into a doomsday. Poor people consume far fewer resources than rich people, and they only burden their own local environment. Therefore high population density only means local misery in the third world -- they will have no effect on world civilization and world progress. The portion of world trade coming out of Africa is like 1%. IE, the high population growth will not translate into their consumption of our natural resources, nor were we gaining any of their natural resources that will now be lost to the 1st world by greater local consumption. Africa is a non-entity and whether its population is high or low, it will have no effect on the rest of the world -- unless we allow them to emigrate here. Therefore the solution, like always, is to cut off immigration and preserve our white, civilized majority populations. This solution just so happens to have majority support in polls in both America and Europe, and is therefore completely viable in our political future.
Meanwhile, let's talk about good news that contrasts with the collapse chorus predictions. Half Sigma has a very interesting post up:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/found-genes-that-make-kids-smart/story-e6frg6nf-1225926421510
"SCIENTISTS have identified more than 200 genes potentially associated with academic performance in schoolchildren.
Those schoolchildren possessing the "right" combinations achieved significantly better results in numeracy, literacy and science.
The finding emerged from a study of more than 4000 British children to pinpoint the genes and genetic combinations that influence reasoning skills and general intelligence.
One of its main conclusions is that intelligence is controlled by a network of thousands of genes with each making just a small contribution to overall intelligence, rather than the handful of powerful genes that scientists once predicted.
The researchers believe their work could eventually lead to genetic tests to predict babies' academic potential."
This is the sort of study I've been waiting for. Released to a normal newspaper, we have normal scientists stating matter-of-factly that they have found genes for intelligence. They also report matter-of-factly that they could design a test that will predict the intelligence of your child upon birth. All of this is heresy to liberals. How many more studies like this until the entire liberal lie breaks down and the waters of truth start overflowing the dam?
"The scale of the search needed to track down all the genes involved in complex areas such as intelligence was beyond scientists' abilities until recently. The deployment of computers means they can now begin to work out the interactions of these genes."
It isn't just our improving computers though. We also have improved genome sequencing that is faster and cheaper every year. Soon genome sequencing will take a day and cost $1,000, so cheap that we could sequence the entire genome of everyone living on Earth. With that kind of data to observe, even the subtlest statistical trends will stand out like a sore thumb. Therefore, even the genes with the minutest impact on intelligence will all be easily identifiable, and then biologically determined racial IQ gaps will be verifiable once and for all. Not only will this free whites from the accusations that we are the cause of non-white failure, it will give whites a powerful argument for why they should have the right to not be miscegenated and colonized away into oblivion, and it will give scientists a future prospect at genetic engineering that could give all humans the intelligence genes we today find only in our most superior specimens. Talk about a bright future!
All it takes is time for the truth to prevail. This is because all real-world observations verify the Truth but discredit lies. Eventually the evidence mounts up because scientists keep making more and more empirical observations, and then a scientific revolution occurs and the lies are swept away. It happened for Copernicus vs. Aristotle, it happened for Darwin vs. Creationism, and it will happen for Rushton vs. Boaz too. It's frustrating to realize the truth one hundred years ahead of your time, but it is very rare for the truth to lose out in the end against lies. It isn't like people are returning to flat earth theories now that we know the Earth is round. Truth is slow and steady.
Also, the Republicans are going to win in a landslide this coming November. By seizing power, they will help prevent A) the worst abuses of the Obamacare bill, B) Amnesty, C) Cap & Trade, D) Any other crazy Democratic ideas. I wrote in an earlier post that America would simply be destroyed if Obama managed to pass Amnesty, get rid of all the bush tax cuts, and pass cap and trade all in the midst of a depression. There was just no way we could recover economically from so many bad bills. But things looked a little brighter when Scott Brown won the senate seat in Massachusetts, and now they're looking much brighter with the polls favoring Republicans all across the nation. My fears have been averted and, as it turns out, none of said bills passed. The Bush tax cuts will largely remain, cap and trade won't pass, Amnesty won't pass, and the great recession is clearing up.
On the technological front, a car just demonstrated in an X-prize competition a 100 miles per gallon capability, about three times as good as our current automobile fleet. Another source of energy efficiency is Intel's coming memristor chips in our next generation of computers. Memristors are great at reducing heat and thus lowering the energy demands to cool our servers. Through energy efficiency we can make our current fossil fuels go further than the doom and gloom predictors, and meanwhile alternative energy is making continuous progress to pick up the slack.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power
"The World Wind Energy Association forecast that, by 2010, over 200 GW of capacity would have been installed worldwide,[55] up from 73.9 GW at the end of 2006, implying an anticipated net growth rate of more than 28% per year."
30% growth per year isn't too shabby. Furthermore, the cost of new wind installations is no higher than new coal or natural gas plants. The future of energy, which is the basic source of all economic well-being, is bright.
No comments:
Post a Comment