Blog Archive

Monday, July 5, 2010

Culture of Critique Reviewed:

I finally finished Culture of Critique, because I consider it  a necessary corpus of literature when discussing the Jewish Question.  I had always been told that all anyone need do is read Culture of Critique and they would become proper anti-semites.  I have also heard that Macdonald is an evil anti-semite and he writes nothing but hate-filled lies about jews in the book.  (This usually by anti-anti-semites who have never read the book.)  I'm sorry to say the book isn't in the least either of these descriptions.  Compared to the Bell Curve or Human Accomplishment, Race, Evolution, and Behavior, Wealth and IQ of Nations, Hart's Understanding Human History, The 10,000 Year Explosion, and other scientific books that really expand your mental horizons and change your mind about the world, this book is useless.

Culture of Critique doesn't tell us anything we didn't already know, unless we were living under a rock somewhere and avoiding any knowledge of the subject.  He wraps everything in sophisticated terminology instead of simple speech, and this somehow is supposed to make his argument stronger.  However, the strength of your argument isn't based on whether you use technical terms or normal English, it's based on the power of reasoning you use between the islands of facts, and the narrative you tell that strings the well-known facts together.  Here is what we know, and the Culture of Critique sets out to show through numerous citations:

Jews were over-represented among the communists in the Soviet Union, Europe, and the USA.  They participated to a great extent in the communist crimes and tyrannies of Europe, and were traitors and spies within the USA actively aiding the Soviet Union during the Cold War.  Karl Marx, of course, was a jew.

Sigmund Freud and his followers were jews.  They made up ridiculous explanations for people's behavior, used no scientific methodology to verify them, and applied said formulas to vilify whites and white cultural norms.

Franz Boas and his followers were jews.  Ashley Montagu, Margarat Mead, Stephen Gould, and Franz Boas all lied and broke the rules of science and ethics to push the idea that all races were exactly the same and interchangeable, and that all differences between races were purely due to the environment.  Later jewish liars like Jared Diamond continued this policy through influential books like "Guns, Germs, and Steel."  Due to the sheer volume of jewish liars in elite anthropological circles and the media that propagates these lies, they have managed to completely change the commoner's understanding of racial reality to America's permanent detriment.  If we don't relearn the common sense of our ancestors on these issues and somehow vanquish these jewish lies, we are absolutely doomed.

Emanuel Celler and other jews were the main opponents of immigration restriction, and the main forces behind the 1965 Immigration Act which has directly led to the genocide of America's founding stock.  All the jewish ethnic organizations, the American Jewish Congress and the like, spent every waking hour trying to get Congress to allow unlimited immigration of non-whites into this country, due to their hatred of any form of discrimination, no matter how light a touch, and no matter that it was directed against foreigners, not natives.  The death of the American nation is the direct responsibility of this Congress which passed the laws against the will of the people, who have always when polled desired less immigration and resented the loss of their white majority status.

Many jewish journalists are anti-American and have created a revisionist narrative of American, and European, history that demonizes whites and lionizes non-whites as 'heroes of suffering.'  Whether in academia or politics, jews have attempted to organize all non-whites as 'victims' and all whites as 'oppressors', which has caused all sorts of bad policies (like affirmative action), as well as bad blood between the corresponding ethnic groups.  Using jews' unique soapbox as the rulers of Hollywood, the New York Times, all the major news channels, Newsweek, etc, they have corrupted a normal, healthy, and natural love for one's own people into the greatest and worst sin in life.  It is better to be a rapist than a racist in America, you will get more sympathy and have a higher social status.  This creates enormous cognitive dissonance since everyone is born racist, and everyone who pretends to be anti-racist is plagued by feelings of guilt and shame by the knowledge that in truth they are doing everything they can to avoid blacks in the real world.  It also causes people to atomize themselves, disassociating from all groups since it is 'evil' to associate with the group they are naturally drawn to and want to form.  Putnam clearly shows this in his scientific study 'Bowling Alone.'

Macdonald's conclusion, based on these facts, is that jews are a hostile, destructive force aimed at white Americans.  That the two groups can never co-exist and one or the other must go.

But does one have to arrive at these conclusions?  There's an alternate explanation for every one of these facts, that is innocuous, innocent, or even admirable.  Jewish malice can't be proven just by what they did, it has to be proven by what they intended to do.

Let's take for instance jewish adherence to communism.  Considering that communists allowed jews upward mobility while the czar kept them poor, out of elite positions, and occasionally slaughtered jews to the extent of hundred of thousands of victims, one could quickly see why jews had to support Communism as their only escape from an unjust hell.  Likewise, jewish communists in Eastern Europe had all previously been oppressed and kept in ghettos under the previous nationalist governments of that time.  Why exactly wouldn't they be revolutionaries attempting to subvert their host nations?  The American Revolution was fought over a stamp tax -- we hardly have reason to complain when jews stage revolutions in the face of much greater abuses.  Stalin was a Georgian and Lenin was only 1/4 jewish, so we can never really know how bloody a jewish communist reign would have been.  For all we know all the blood was the fault of the gentiles, and the jews only wanted freedom and safety for themselves, but had to follow orders out of fear of incurring their higher-ups wrath.

Jews who lived abroad would obviously wish the Soviet Union to succeed, since it was the only protection jews had against the anti-semitism of the native folk of Russia.  Their spying, funding, and treason for the Soviet Union makes sense if they were just trying to help out their own, not trying to hurt America.  There is no serious support for communism among jews in America or Russia today.

Jews in the early 1900's could well question the technical veracity of an infant science like genetics.  This is a century before the first human genome is even sequenced, there was no hard proof of genetic differences beneath the skin between the races.  There still, to this day, is no hard proof of genetic differences.  Hopefully, as the price of genetic sequencing goes down, we will be able to find the genes for intelligence, personality, and behavior.  We will then be able to compare and contrast the races in terms of their proportions of these important genes.  None of this has been done yet, and so it makes sense for jews to claim it isn't true.  After all, jews are the first victims of race science.  The Nazis used it against them, so why wouldn't everyone else?  Jews would rather everyone were the exact same genetically, so that people could no longer discriminate against them.  So long as the science remains within doubt, why should we insist on the absolute worst interpretation of the data, the one interpretation that practically screams for hatred, war, genocide, and a new Holocaust?  It may be frustrating to deal with jewish liars deterring our progress in sociobiology, but unless we can somehow give assurances that none of our conclusions will be detrimental to their well-being, it only makes sense from a perspective of self-defense to do everything they can to stop us.

As for the original opposition to immigration restriction, this was before World War II, where all jews everywhere were oppressed and under the threat of genocide in their host nations.  It only makes sense jews would want America to present open arms to their confederates abroad.  After the war, they resented the immigration policy all the more because the Holocaust they had feared had happened and we hadn't accepted the jews of Europe in time to save them.  To make sure such a mistake will 'never happen again,' they have fought for open immigration laws and against discrimination.  Furthermore, jews have no fear of economic competition from foreign immigrants because they are the smartest people on Earth.  Therefore no amount of immigrants will ever threaten jewish power or success.  They get all the benefits of immigration, cheap labor, cultural pluralism that acts as camouflage, etc, without any of the costs.  Jews are just acting out of self-interest by promoting mass immigration.  Why wouldn't they lobby for more of it?

A lot of America's history is racist, sexist, tyrannical, bloody, and evil.  It's no wonder jewish journalists picked up on these themes and tried to make whites feel guilty about them.  It is their experience that racists will always come for the jews first, above all other groups, and that therefore teaching anti-racism is necessary for self-defense.  Jews would prefer a group of ashamed, individualistic, atomized whites who won't organize to oust jews from their positions of wealth and power.  Any white organization will be primarily aimed at plundering or killing jews, since jews are the only serious economic and status competitors with whites in America.  Therefore jews have to strike 'preemptively' by keeping us down, so that we won't keep them down, like every other white group has done to them in the past.

This doesn't make jews angels or saints, but it does make them normal and human.  Why wouldn't whites, in the same position as jews, act the exact same way we see jews acting?  If a white group had the same history and position as jews did in some other society, would we have acted any differently?  If whites hadn't caused jews legitimate fear and pain, maybe they wouldn't have done any of these things.  There's no way to know now who is to blame for what.  It isn't true that jews were never oppressed in America and thus have no right to fear American whites.  Not only was jewish immigration restricted in their time of need, whites set up quotas against jews entering prestigious universities and used other exclusionary mechanisms to keep jews out of the power and wealth their merit would have earned in a level playing field.  Since we acted the exact same way in principle, if not in degree, as the Russians and Poles acted towards their jews, they had every reason to fear and resent us.

It may be true that with all the conflict between jews and whites over the last century, it is impossible for us to ever understand or trust one another again.  But then, we haven't even tried yet.  No one has asked everyone to set aside their fears and resentments and begin a new age of love and harmony.  Jews have a 50% out-marriage rate in America.  If whites love jews enough, we can love them all to death.  The entire jewish race would be wiped out without any violence or pain, and jews would no longer view their interests as separate or endangered by the white majority.  If jews stopped fearing whites because there was no division between jews and whites, they would stop all of their self-interested, white-hostile behaviors that provoke anti-semitism.  Anti-semites, in turn, would cease to exist, allowing jews to assimilate with the rest of the white majority.  Yes, this might mean jews rise to the top of all our wealth and status barometers due to their merit, but who cares?  So long as they do the job right, it's as good as any other group of leaders/rulers.  If our fair and loving treatment of jews gets them to stop fearing us and start identifying with us, maybe they won't constantly be trying to undermine and demonize white Americans.  How do we know it won't work until we try?  Why do whites need to be at the top of petty things like wealth or status anyway?  In a socialist state, everyone will have enough material goods to get by.  As for status, people can find high status outside of their jobs.  It's not the end of the world to be second best.

Furthermore, loving and embracing jews is a lot more likely to work than denouncing and opposing them, given that they have a complete stranglehold on power in contemporary America.  There is no way to dethrone jews from their current position, so we may as well get used to it.  If you can't beat 'em, join 'em.  Literally.  Marry them!  No better solution presents itself, no other practical solution ever will.  If we make known that no genetic knowledge or scientific advancements will convince us to turn on the jews, maybe they'd let sociobiology and eugenics progress as well.  We don't know until we try.

I don't think anyone's primary motive for their actions is hatred.  It is always love.  Whites acting in their own self-interest shouldn't be called 'racists', and jews acting in their own interest shouldn't be called 'vermin.'  Instead we should find ways that benefit both groups equally and allow us to get along.  This world isn't so grim that one person's self-interest is automatically to the detriment of another's.  Trade involves two consenting parties who think they got the better end of the deal.  Marriage partners both think themselves blessed to have gotten the spouse they did.  For the same reason, jews and whites can live together if they want to.  It's up to whites to offer a political program appealing enough to jews, and it's up to jews to bury their fears and their insular marriage practices and embrace the white majority.  This is happening in the real world, far away from anti-semitic internet forums.  If anti-semites don't muck it up by scaring the jews all over again back into their holes, like groundhogs refusing to come out in February, maybe we can solve this issue in a couple generations -- a blink of the historic eye.  And if we're wrong and jews really are inveterately hostile to whites, wouldn't it be better to have first exposed the proof of this, and removed all jewish excuses for their behavior, beforehand?  Wouldn't anti-semitism have wider appeal once it's been decisively proven that whites are spotless and perfect and jews are evil and malicious?  So far whites have killed and oppressed jews from one end of the world to the other, while during the same century jews have won half the world's nobel prizes and helped cure polio.  Who exactly is looking like the villain after all the slates are tallied?

Give jews a hundred years of rope to hang themselves with.  If, after a hundred years of scrupulously non-threatening, fair, and even doting behavior whites bestow on jews, they still hate us and spend every waking hour trying to find new ways to make us miserable, maybe more people would lend credence to the idea that 'jews are our misfortune' and take up the pitchforks as anti-semites desire.  As things currently stand, jews are far too powerful AND far too liked for any such attempt.  Common sense should get anti-semites to give their arguments a rest.

P.S:  Wizard's First Rule:  "People are stupid, they will believe what they want to believe, or fear is true."  This completely explains jewish behavior, without having to resort to malice.  Jews fear various things are true about white Americans, and are acting in all sorts of ways to prevent the realization of these fears.  Because they are afraid, they aren't rational in assessing the level of risk white Americans present.  Jews also want to believe other things are true, like the equality of mankind, the possibility of achieving full economic equality, non-discrimination, everyone being judged as an individual, or not even being judged at all, etc.  Since these are all theoretically very nice dreams, there is a heavy pressure to be irrational about the chances of their success, and discount evidence that contradicts them.  Everyone does it, non-jews and jews alike.

P.P.S:  Reducing jewish fears and granting jewish dreams is the easiest way to cure them of their stupidity.

No comments: