No Allied soldiers liberated any death camps. All camps where, presumably, gassings occurred, were liberated by the Soviets. We only have their word that what happened there is what they said happened. All official Holocaust historians agree that all camps liberated by USA/Brits were normal concentration camps, and the deaths were due to starvation and disease, which wouldn't have occurred except for the allied bombing campaigns disrupting the railroad supply network. The Red Cross constantly inspected the camps and said the facilities were humane and made no mention of lethal gas chambers at Auschwitz or anywhere else.
There is no prussian blue coloring on the wall of the supposed Auschwitz death-gas chamber. There is on the nearby known delousing facility. The Polish study simply picked up a larger concentration of the gas than the Rudolf study, it's visibly apparent that no blue stain exists.
Not all jews have to be liars for their account of the Holocaust to be false. We have the word of two 'eye-witnesses' that some 100,000, 400,000, or whatever jews died at Belzec. Only two jews have to be liars for this to not be the case. All other jews are just repeating what they've heard. There are no photographs or autopsies of gassed jewish corpses. There is no internal documentation among Germans talking about gassed jews. There are a handful of witnesses who say they worked in the gas chambers, but when you investigate their stories they fall apart -- for instance they cleared away bodies that would have been lethal to handle without even wearing gloves, shirts, or gas masks after just 'leaving the door open' to clear out the air. The Treblinka account is based entirely on a few eyewitnesses as taken down by soviet propaganda officer (and jew) Vassily Grossman. In that story were lurid tales of scooping up fat and pouring it back on to open fires that burnt piles of jewish bodies into nothingness, and other descriptions that the laws of physics simply don't allow. Not all jews have to be liars, in fact, only Vassily Grossman, or the people he talked to, have to be liars.
Convicting anyone of anything based solely on eye witness testimony is ridiculous. Van Pelt, a Holocaust historian, has admitted that there is no concrete evidence for 99% of the Holocaust. By that standard the witch hunts that killed tens of thousands of innocent women must also have been true, because only 'lunatics' would claim 'all peasants are liars' or 'all christians are liars.'
http://globalfire.tv/nj/10en/history/99pct_a_lie.htm
Jews who talked about their families being separated and never seeing them again does not mean they died. It could just mean they separated and never saw each other again. Or it could mean they died of natural causes. In any event, it isn't the defense's responsibility to explain what happened to jews during WWII. It is the prosecutions responsibility to prove Germany intentionally killed them. Since they have a handful of eye witness testimonies that, when examined, are too ridiculous or unscientific to believe, and their own experts agree they have no other source of evidence, the prosecution has no case.
The easiest way to check the orthodox Holocaust history is to dig up the mass graves where supposedly millions of jews were buried at Treblinka, Belzec, etc. It does not matter that these same jews were later burnt to an untraceable ash leaving (again supposedly) no evidence whatsoever, because the mere fact that the mass graves were created means they must still be there in the form of disturbed, mixed together dirt layers and unpacked earth. This is just simple physics, any objective investigation could immediately find said mass graves, we even know from eye witness testimony where they are supposed to be. Mass graves from all other mass murders in history have been uncovered, but none have been found for the most famous one in history.
If the Holocaust occurred, and it is so easy to prove it, why has no one gone ahead and proven it by discovering these mass graves? The Holocaust is the one genocide in history that left no bodies, or even graves that once held bodies, behind. Isn't that in the least fishy?
If you were serious about arguing with Holocaust Deniers, you should first watch 1/3 of the Holocaust, and read Dissecting the Holocaust, which is a compendium of research articles from all the most important holocaust revisionist scholars. Since you are ignorant of the true state of Holocaust research, how can you have any opinion on the matter? If you have all this time to attack anti-semites and holocaust deniers, you have the time to read Dissecting the Holocaust and watch 1/3 of the Holocaust. If you were confident in your opinions they could stand the force of inquiry and challenge.
Meanwhile, Steve Sailer in his article today again proves the extent of Jewish power.
http://vdare.com/
Steve Sailer says jews control hollywood, are 35% of the Forbes 400 and 50% of the Atlantic 50. He says they are now the de facto rulers of America.
"Thus, American Jews should realize that, like the Protestant elite of yore, their privileged position as a de facto leadership caste bestows upon themselves corresponding duties to conserve the long-term well-being of the United States--"
You have said that anti-semites have never proven you wrong on the facts, ever, about anything. But you were the one who said jews didn't have any serious power in America, and that the extent of jewish power was very small, no more than Episcopalians. You made many mentions about how 2% of the population couldn't control the other 98%. So which is it? Is Steve Sailer another lunatic in need of medication, or were you factually wrong about something?
Could it be that the reason why the Holocaust has been so overblown and distorted is because jews are extremely powerful, especially in sensitive places like the media, which shapes public perception of past, present, and future? Could it be that the proverb -- "winners write the history books." is actually true and not just an anti-semitic canard? Why is the Holocaust the one event in history it is illegal to question in many countries around the world? What are they afraid people will find out from an independent, objective, scientific investigation?
Attacking people who disagree with you as 'losers' and 'lunatics' is the exact same tactic you object to when anti-semites call you a 'fbi agent' or 'married to a jew.'
If all anti-semites disappeared tomorrow you still wouldn't have the power to ban affirmative action or stop immigration. This is because the elites do not listen to the people, no matter how reasonably they frame their arguments. We have poll after poll showing the opinion of our elites does not match the opinion of any religious or racial group, here or in Europe. You dismiss all these polls which show the elites are to blame, and instead blame anti-semites for all our problems. Why do you want to scapegoat anti-semites and holocaust deniers for things we aren't responsible for? Do you seriously think elites are thinking to themselves, "Well, we'd listen to what the average jew has to say, (who when polled is against further immigration), only there are too many anti-semites and holocaust deniers among these jews, so we refuse to listen to such lunacy." The idea is ludicrous. Therefore your entire reason for writing, "defeat the anti-semites so that we can finally end immigration," is equally ludicrous.
No comments:
Post a Comment