Wonders of the Modern World:

Recently, some society or other released a new 7 wonders of the world.

Their choices can be found here: http://www.new7wonders.com/n7w/world

Out of the 7, there is only 1 European wonder of the world, the Colosseum. Latin America got a full 3 wonders of the world, it's apparently the cultural center of humanity and our greatest legacy on Earth.

I'm not satisfied with these results. I think they suck.

Instead I think I'll offer my own 7 wonders of the world. First, in a strict architectural sense:

1. Eiffel Tower.

















2. Hagia Sophia.






















3. Sistine Chapel.



















4. Parthenon.


















5. Pyramids of Egypt.




















6. Taj Mahal.

















7. Kremlin.























But we must recall that all buildings are built not just to look pretty, but with some function in mind. Due to this, all great buildings have some utilitarian role in mind, they aren't just to be looked at. The churches, temples, tombs, and world's fair proof-of-principle concepts listed above were all designed with a function that meant a great deal to the people of their era. The modern world is different. We don't have enough faith anymore to build a new cathedral or mosque to match the old ones. So it is important to ask ourselves, what structures we Are building in the modern age, that are of enormous scale, but funded anyway due to some function we find desirable. When you look at it through this lens, we can find a lot of more interesting targets for the title, 'modern wonder of the world.'

1. The US Flag on the Moon.
2. The International Space Station.
3. The map of the human genome.
4. The Large Hadron Collider.
5. Dolly the Sheep.
6. The nuclear submarine.
7. The World Wide Web.

I don't list either the first list, or the second list, in any particular order. I think they are all incredible achievements. I am perfectly willing to believe that I'm missing a few items, and should replace a few items listed. It doesn't matter. This is a good barometer of the true wonders of the world, and is accurate enough to make my point.

I think these are our most 'wonderful', hands down 'splashy' achievements not because they might be the most useful invention (like say, antibiotics, or transistors, or silicon chips), but because they evoke the same ancient spirit of creating magnificent, overawing landmarks and breakthroughs. The fact that man once walked on the moon, and the small little flag that dots the lunar landscape to prove it, has to be our proudest achievement in that vein. But the decades long project to create a continuously manned, scientifically useful, and comfortably, safely, cheaply habitable space station is also great stuff. The ISS constantly growing and morphing these last decades, moving steadily towards completion, using the united space programs of the entire civilized world, is a wonderful and splashy sight.

The fact that we can now clone life forms and take reproduction into our own hands is a signature breakthrough with huge potential across many fields, and the humble little sheep named Dolly will always go down in history as its representative. After billions of dollars and decades of work, our computers have finally given us a complete map of the human genome. Not only is this simply an enormous landmark of data over the most interesting topic in the universe, but it opens up the possibilities for genetic engineering and the discovery of how genes relate to intelligence, personality, disease, mental illness, sexual preference, and behavior. That endless string of letters is the answer to the questions that have dogged our philosophers and theologians for thousands of years.

The overlaying of virtual and physical reality into a new, parallel, e-world is something no one even imagined in the past. People are just as likely to interact online as in real life, digital content from music to movies is easily downloadable, shopping can be done at home, businesses can stay in touch with their workers and their products, and information previously unheard of or known only to a few scholars is available to everyone on earth for free. The world wide web has made us redefine reality, romance, communication and commerce, and continues to shape each generation's lives in new and unexpected ways.

The nuclear submarine encompasses an impressive display of independent technologies, and is the ultimate weapon in humanity's arsenal. With a nuclear power engine, it stealthily floats miles beneath the sea, using a specially constructed metal skin that can resist both water pressure and detection from above. Deep in its vaults lies the nuclear missle, combining a rocket that can send payloads into space and a nuclear weapon that can annihilate whole cities. Such a creation is on the level of ancient gods, it's hard to believe Thor or Zeus would stand any chance against it. A submarine can survive virtually any disaster, natural or man-made, and can stay underwater for months. The owner of a nuclear submarine, just one, is stronger than the majority of nations on Earth.

Deep beneath the mountains of Switzerland lies our newest microscope, the Large Hadron Collider. Using billions of dollars, endless vats of computers, magnets, cooling agents, miles of underwater tunnel, and thousands of highly trained scientists, we accelerate particles to near light speed and smash them together with unimaginable accuracy, just in hopes of seeing something we haven't seen before. As proof that man will go to any length to satisfy his curiosity, and having the real potential to finally make sense of the laws of physics that define our universe, the LHC cannot be rivaled in importance by anything else in science. The sheer scale of the project, the tininess of the subject they are studying, and the foundational aspect of what its discoveries mean for both the origin and destiny of the universe, makes the LHC as splashy as it gets.

Without political correctness' intervention, the architectural beauty of the world is centered in Europe. It contains 5 of the 7 wonders of the world. Both the pyramids and the taj mahal were built by Caucasians, which under a wider net would give us 7/7 wonders of the world.

Given that man's genius has always sought some function to its endeavors, rather than buildings for the sake of mere frippery, and given that religion has taken a back step to science in the modern age, it stands to reason that we should look at giant scientific works of the modern world as our new 'wonders.' From that viewpoint, whites have built 7/7 of the new wonders of the world as well.

So after looking at these lists, you have to come to a new conclusion: The greatest wonder of the ancient and the modern world, is the white race who built all the others.

Problems Only WN Can Solve:

Why do I keep saying America will fall and only white nationalism can possibly emerge in its wake? Do I have a crystal ball? Am I just indulging in fantasy?

No, and no. What I have is the force of history and the intelligence and knowledge to interpret the historical signs I see in front of me.

First, no diverse empire has ever held together in history. Eventually it always fractures along ethnic lines. The Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia are all recent examples of this. But in truth for centuries now we have seen examples of this -- When the European empires fell, hundreds of ethnic nations emerged in their wake. Some, like Hungary, in Europe. Some, like Iraq, emerging from the Ottomans. Some, like Venezuela, splitting off from 'Grande Colombia.' Some splitting from South Africa and becoming Swaziland. You see, it's everywhere. History has been utterly merciless to diversity for centuries now. As late as 1960, America was still 90% white. It was stable for centuries because it was not, in fact, diverse. Only in the 1980's did Mexican immigration pick up speed enough to start creating a truly diverse America. That has set the clock ticking -- no country has ever survived diversity, we have been in the midst of diversity for 30 years now. It's just a question of time. The stress builds every day. White flight proves whites are unwilling to live around non-whites, at any price. Eventually America will run out of places to flee, and whites will be forced to turn and fight for a land of their own instead. Current white attitudes, and a history of thousands of years, shows America is no more magical than any other section of mankind -- just like everyone else, we can't abide diversity. We want to live around people like ourselves. And like everyone else, we will eventually resort to civil war to secure this right.

The answer to diversity is a white ethno-state, set up in a sparsely populated but large landmass of the United States, the northwestern states and Alaska. Only white nationalism is offering people this solution. No other solution is viable. There is no other way to escape diversity. Therefore when the problem of diversity reaches a flash point, no one will seek out communism, libertarianism, christianity, or any other creed. They will see none of them have any solutions to their problem, and they will seek out white nationalism instead.

Second, the debt is approaching the level of a failed state. Once the majority of a country's GDP is spent on interest on its debt, it has become a failed state. It will either be seized by its creditors, or collapse in revolution, as the government fails to provide any services to its people while collecting massive taxes. This has also happened multiple times in history. Britain seized Egypt in the 1800's because its entire GDP was simply servicing interest on the debt to Britain. When Egypt threatened to not pay back its debt, Britain conquered Egypt and kept the interest payments coming. America's debt is impossible to pay back. It is now at 130 trillion. The interest on the debt is approaching 50% of all government spending. Once the baby boomers retire and start collecting social security and medicare, we are doomed. The extra benefits programs of Bush's prescription drugs, and now Obama's national health service, will only exacerbate the problem. The onerous provisions of cap and trade will bankrupt America that much sooner. Our endless wars overseas are only exacerbating our debt. Just like the Soviet Union collapsed from Afghanistan, Afghanistan is going to bankrupt and collapse America too. Neither republicans nor democrats have shown any ability to control deficit spending or eliminate debt. It will continue to rise, it cannot be paid off, and interest on the debt will reach such unpayable levels that a taxpayer revolt will follow.

White Nationalism has an easy answer to our debt problems. If we are a new nation, we don't owe a dime to anyone. We have nothing to do with the USA's debt, as we are no longer a part of the USA. A white separatist state would leave behind the decayed husk of the USA, which would still exist on paper, and would still be responsible for all of its debt and the people who have to answer to all of their creditors. We won't be. We will start with a new currency and a new budget, at a complete 0. A new beginning, total debt forgiveness for everyone, a clean slate. Considering how many people are in debt to their ears just to pay for necessities in America like housing, transportation, and education, total debt forgiveness to all the vampires who gave out these loans is a selling point only WN will offer. Come to our state and start over, this time with a citizen's dividend to help pay your way through life. That is the only answer. The old USA is bankrupt and can't do anything anymore about its headlong plummet into insolvency.

Third, modern employment is a shell game. Most people are not in fact in productive employment, they are pretending they are doing something and collecting pay checks from those they con -- either from tax payers, or from fools who buy their useless products and services because of a sufficiently persuasive advertisement. America is determined to exist for the sake of the super rich, who set public policy. They will continue to allow millions of unskilled immigrants into the country even with 20% unemployment rates. They will continue to take advantage of gullible and stupid people with all sorts of insurance, lawyers, debt, and luxury spending scams. Credit cards have interest rates at like 50%. This is just usury. Public bureaucrats who ostensibly were hired to take care of the poor, pocket all of the money for themselves and only take care of themselves. Teachers fail to teach their students the most basic abilities in math, reading, and writing. Kids are going to college incapable of converting fractions to decimals.

We are facing a dual problem, a giant employed workforce that do nothing but leech off of the productive, and a giant unemployed workforce that can't even do that. The answer isn't to get everyone back to work. There isn't enough work to do that. The answer is a new paradigm where work is not the center of life. First, we must stop immigration so that what work there is, is available to our citizens. Second, we must pay a citizen's dividend so that people without work can still live and raise children in our community. We should return to jobs based on manufacturing, extraction of natural resources, and high tech gadgets our geniuses can provide the outside world. As we will have high standards for our citizenry, and use eugenics from there to improve them, we will quickly have the best scientists and universities on Earth. Converting that into businesses that provide money is not that difficult. Imagine our experts going around building fusion power plants for China. That's a very large market, that only White Nationalism will achieve, because we are the only people on earth serious about creating genius (eugenics) educating genius (IQ tracking and schools for the gifted, not the remedial, put first), and employing genius (giving them the money they need to spend on science experiments of their choice). In America, some woeful amount of GDP is spent on research and development. Something less than 5%. All of it goes down the sink of maintenance costs, like medicare. By lowering our maintenance costs and honoring a more frugal living (and abolishing all parasitism that diverts our economy down sewer holes), we can save more money and sink it into science. By investing more in science, we can become the leaders of the world in technology. By becoming the leaders, we can create whole new markets that will both employ and enrich our citizenry.

Fourth, nihilism and hedonism have seized our youth culture and it is hurting them, and those around them, in incalculable ways. Anyone you ask, if offered a choice between being dumped, or beaten up, would choose being beaten up. But assault is banned and dumping is fine. Anyone on earth who was given a choice between losing their wallet, and losing their wife, would choose their wallet. But stealing is banned and divorce is fine. Anyone on earth who was given a choice between their house being burned down, and becoming addicted to a deadly chemical which warps their whole life around mindless highs and lows until they die, would choose for their houses to burn down. But arson is banned and drugs are fine. Anyone on earth would prefer to be groped or called a lecherous name, than their kid die in a drunk driving accident (whether it was their kid or the other driver.) And yet sexual harassment is banned and alcohol is legal.

In our bizarro world, the things that hurt us most, are all legal, and we have no legal recourse to avenge ourselves upon our victimizers. Whereas the things that hurt us least -- well, it's not like they are rigorously persecuted either. Crime gets almost as large a free pass as immorality in the new improved America. America has no intention of stopping this descent. Crime will rise in direct correlation to the demographics of our minorities. Feminism will continue to entrench itself, and hedonism will continue to spread, so long as broken homes perpetuate a vicious cycle into worse and worse behavior each generation. There is nothing communism, libertarianism, liberals, or Christianity can do to stop these trends, because none of them are willing to pass any law against them.

White nationalism is different. It grants that if a government is going to take away your right to redress your grievances, then it must redress your grievances itself. If we are not allowed to kill women who cheat on us, then the government must punish them, and prevent them from committing adultery, in the first place. If we are not allowed to seek out and kill anyone who hurts our family, the government must seek out and kill them first. If we are not allowed to enforce oaths like "till death do us part," then the government must enforce those oaths for us, by banning divorce in all but exceptional cases. If we are not allowed to protect our children by limiting their access to mental sewage, drug dealers, sluts, alcohol, and so on -- then the government must be willing to do so for us. The current US government requires all the children of America run a gauntlet of STD's, miscegenation, pre-marital sex, drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, depression, suicide, and crime before they hit 25. A parent of a single child, after investing his entire life into that child's happiness, must sit back and watch helplessly to see what will become of him, now that he is outside the parent's protection. More often than not, the result is horrible, and breaks their heart. Who speaks for them? Who offers any solace to them? Just as horrible though is a parent with five kids, who has to run the gauntlet five times, each time wondering if this is the loved one who society will corrupt, betray, and kill before he even had a chance to live. We need a government that addresses a parent's fears and a child's rights to grow up in an environment that's at least attempting to give them a good life. Attempting to provide a happy path for them to follow. Our commercials, our media, our stories, do nothing but celebrate vice and degeneracy. But the people who actually practice these creeds are not happy and vivacious like the stories show. They are depressed, suicidal, poor, diseased, despised, and ashamed of themselves. Nothing good comes from it. They are sold a bill of goods, conned. They are victims of a fraud perpetrated by their society. It said drug use, alcohol, cigarettes, free love, divorce, adultery, sodomy, and all the rest were the path to happiness and liberation, when in fact they are just a path to hell and an early death, making everyone else miserable around you as you go.

Eventually society will become so degenerate it will no longer be able to raise a functioning member of society. When the entire next generation of kids become homeless nymphomaniac druggees, society will no longer stand. At that point only a pure ethnostate that starts over from first principles, that unapologetically stamps out vice and sin, can save a state from economic and violent dissolution.

Fifth, the birth rates of the modern west are unsustainable. Any culture that fails to have 2.1 children per generation is doomed to eventual extinction. Whites in America are something like 1.7. Smarter whites have an even lower birth rate. Obviously, if your population keeps halving, and halving, and halving, each generation, eventually it disappears entirely. Given the state of marriage, the state of the economy, the state of our morals, there is no way people will spontaneously start having more kids. They can't afford them, and they are too selfish to have them or raise them. Many people have a genuine fear that even having children in this age is child abuse. If they have no hope that a white born today could have a good life in a majority-minority USA, they will simply not have kids as a mercy to them.

Libertarianism, communism, christianity, none of these people can solve the fertility rate, because none of them are willing to lay down a simple law. You MUST marry by age 20 and have 2 kids by age 25. That simple. White nationalism will do so, and in doing so, secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. That is the most essential law in the entire law code. More important even than immigration control. It is the absolute pillar of the new white ethno-state. Without it, all we have is ashes, old age, and death. Alongside this law, will be help provided by the government to make sure it is possible to follow it. The citizen's dividend, which can pay for a family of 4 even without any other job. Apprenticeships for children leaving school, so they have a real chance at a skilled job they enjoy. Moral education in the schools, so people get used to their duty and do not find it particularly harsh or onerous. And laws that forbid adultery and divorce, that help keep families together. And a military and police force willing to make sure no one can harm the children you do have.

Given that America is plunging into nihilist hedonism, unpayable debt, intolerable diversity, below replacement birth rates, and economic disaster, the question isn't why America would fail. The real question is how can anyone imagine it will survive? It is fated to fall. History demands it falls. The only way for it not to fall, at this point, would be technological inventions so dramatic they simply sweep the board of all preexisting conditions and start civilization over on a new level. Technology does not have much time left to do this. The collapse will be within 30-50 years. All of the problems listed above have no answer from the usual suspects. In fact, they are the people who created these problems in the first place. The biggest problem is they fail to recognize them as problems. The second largest is none of them have the guts to pass a law against them. If you don't have the guts to pass a law, you cannot solve any problem. If individuals could solve their own problems, they wouldn't exist in the first place. It's obvious, by the very existence of our problems, that individuals CANNOT solve them alone, that government IS needed to find solutions to them. Even so, libertarians, liberals, conservatives, all harp endlessly on how individuals, freedom, and the free market will find solutions to all of our problems. If they could have found a solution, they would have by now. All across the world fertility is extinction level for the white race. Every single government has responded by saying individuals will work it out themselves. Every single country continues to reproduce at extinction levels. What larger experiment is necessary to prove my point? Will they need the extra data of the next 30 years? Do any of them think fertility will turn around in that time? With mass immigration flooding all the available jobs and unemployment at 20%? Yeah, good luck with that.

Ahh! I forgot dysgenics eventually lowering intelligence to the point that a modern technological society can no longer be maintained, another dagger to the heart of contemporary America. Another problem only WN can solve. I'd also point out a variety of environmental crisis coming our way, from global warming to water loss to topsoil loss, but I am not sure how bad they will really be. I will just point out it is possible environmental crisis will also add to America's woes, and that WN would rely on sustainability as a matter of course. Simply by switching to nuclear power and banning immigration, we would become the most green government on earth.

In any event, the point is this. America's problems are too large for anything to save our country, short of a miracle. All the other parties have no solutions to our problems. People in the midst of this collapse will continue to suffer, no matter how many parties and movements they turn to. Their continued suffering will make them continue searching and changing in the hopes of finding a solution. By default, everyone who turns to nationalism will stop searching or changing, because it is the right answer. This sorting process will result in everyone eventually, by random chance, evolving into white nationalists. At this point we will take power and solve all the problems on Earth. It is simply a syllogism. How can it not be this way? If we are right about the coming problems facing the earth, the problems only we talk about and everyone else refuses to believe even exist, much less need solutions, we will be the only group that can solve them. The only group people can turn to when the crisis arrives. Nationalism is therefore fated to be victorious, or was unnecessary all along, in which case it's better that we're not victorious. Either way we win. IF no crisis arrives and everything is magically perfect, then there was no need for nationalism and we can all just enjoy our peaceful and productive lives. If a crisis does arrive just like we predicted, then people will turn to us for their solutions and we will provide them, for our own lives and theirs, creating a utopia where we can all be happy again. I can't ask for more from either eventuality. The future is bright.

Communism < Conservatism < Liberalism < Islam < Nationalism.

I think this is an important topic, because it is my basis for all my optimism. Communism fell because it was unsustainable. It fell without even a bullet fired. It fell when people realized that there was a gap between their ideology and their reality. The gap could no longer be papered over by lies, it was simply too vast for anyone to not see it anymore. It could no longer be bullied or murdered into submission, because even the soldiers were going hungry, dying in Afghanistan, and ashamed of themselves. There were simply no pillars left for the state to continue, and so it ended. It ended suddenly, without warning, and without a shot fired. There was a collective last gasp of Soviet Man, and it simply died of old age.

The Soviet Union was less capable of long term survival than America is, as far as tyrannies go. For one thing, the rulers of Russia were Russians. This made it very hard for them to be cruel, to be inhuman, towards their own people. Somewhere in their hearts they still loved Mother Russia, and could not bring themselves to the same cruelties that the Georgian Stalin and his jewish comissaars did in the 1930's. America is firmly in the grip of minority rule. The 'slicer' coalition of jews at the top, and their low IQ legions at the bottom, have been dictating our discourse, what can and cannot be said, what can and cannot be thought, for decades. Our minority government is willing to do anything to us. Their open borders policy is genocide, they know it, and they revel in it. They feel nothing for us. Nothing but hatred and the desire to genocide us as quickly as they can. In comparison, Russia's rulers were saints.

Second, the Soviet Union did not have, for the most part, true believers among the populace. The United States does, and in ridiculously high numbers. Communism was not a religion, it was an economic model that promised to deliver people material wealth. This was a very bad system to base a tyranny on, because if it can't deliver the wealth, people have no reason to be loyal to the ideology. Islam is much better. It delivers all its goodies in paradise, after you are dead. There is no way to verify whether Islam is true or not. Therefore it can rule for eternity, and the people subject to it can think they are in fact happy and blessed to live under tyranny, penury, and brutality all their lives. I would say multiculturalism is somewhere in between. This is because the promise of multiculturalism is a spiritual good, that is delivered in the present.

The promise of multiculturalism is that blissful moment when you hold hands and sing kumbayah with people of all types, overcoming all differences for a spiritual union in the embrace of the brotherhood of man. It never has to actually happen in real life, simply imagining it is good enough for most liberals. Liberals who live in all white neighborhoods, who attend all white schools, who go to an all white church, and only marry other whites, still get the spiritual goods of the kumbayah song, rumbling throughout their lives in the back of their heads. "I am one of the good people, the chosen people, the blessed liberal who overcame hate and embraced love." There is no real way to quantify the 'good' that multiculturalism provides for these people. Feeling good about yourself, and gaining the approval of all your peers for evincing the right opinions about multiculturalism, is basically priceless. Even if the whole country is falling apart and the liberals are starving to death in basements hiding from machete wielding blacks, they will be thinking to themselves, "I am one of the good people, the people who embraced love, not hate. If only all those haters hadn't made the blacks so disadvantaged, if only we could have given them more, if only they had been raised differently, none of this would have happened. At least I'll die knowing I wasn't one of those awful racists. I will forgive the very blacks who come to slit my throat, and try one last time to hug them, to show them that really I was one of the good ones, the liberals, who embraced love."

This religious ecstasy will be the highlight of their lives. The more they suffer for diversity, for 'love,' for the brotherhood of man, the more elevated and spiritual and joyous they become. There is no point, no amount of destruction, that could convince them to change their minds. Then their life would have been in vain, and they wouldn't be the elect, the chosen, the blessed, the 'lovers.' They'd rather die than become a 'hater,' it is the new taboo, the unclean, the desecration. You can snort cocaine and have endless sex of all types with all people, and you are still pure. But if you think a nasty thought against a non-white group, you are defiled forever. Religious feeling does not go away simply because a religion has been discredited. Humans evolved to be religious. For one reason, it gave them a healthy respect for the unseen -- like germs and disease. For another, it helped promote order and cooperation between groups, which gave the obedient, the faithful, the meek, an edge over more fractious and infighting barbarians. There might also be further advantages, it might be a consolation for the suffering, a relief to the lonely, a strength to the warrior who would otherwise flee, there's so many benefits faith can provide the weak. Who wouldn't want an all-powerful, or at least very powerful, God on their side? Who wouldn't perform better, at any task, if an All-Knowing God were watching and would judge you in the afterlife? We are stuck with faith.

Liberals have chosen their faith. It is very difficult to convert people from their faith. Communism was not a faith -- liberalism, multiculturalism, is. But unlike Islam, it is a faith that can be shaken by reality. Because many of these liberals will find that, despite themselves, they really do hate the non-whites. That, after enough contact with them, it really has become too much. That they really do want out. That, after all, maybe there really is a limit to how much they can stomach. There are also the people who thought they were liberals, simply because no one had ever told them otherwise, but the moment they are forced to stop and think about it -- by being mugged by a black, or forced into bankruptcy, or divorced, or hurt by some socially approved group -- they suddenly realize they were never liberals to begin with. As non-whites hurt whites more and more often, these people will be the first to realize what a croc the whole thing is.

Liberalism also made the mistake of basing its creed on verifiable facts. It is very difficult to have faith in something when you know it isn't true. Liberalism's required fact, the foolish weakness it left in its armor, is that all people are essentially equal. That the only differences between men and women, whites and blacks, are superficial and bodily. That every single brain is a blank slate, of infinite potential. Just as communism was eventually rebutted by the fact that everyone was still poor, egalitarianism will eventually be rebutted by irrefutable scientific evidence that people are not equal and can never become equal, no matter what you do. This will occur when we find the gene(s) for intelligence. It is inevitable. The gene for intelligence is basically the same as when St. Paul said, "If Christ is not risen, there is no faith." If there is a gene for intelligence, there is no faith. That's it. It simply falls to dust forever. Certainly it is possible to doublethink, to somehow embrace a contradiction, to soldier on despite the nagging doubts in your head, but it's like a deer running after an arrow has already pierced its heart. All the hunter needs do is follow it a few hundred yards and let it die.

Liberalism will not outlive the generation that discovers the intelligence gene. It will die with them. What faith will then replace anti-racism? Like a pendulum's swing, it will of course BE racism. It will be a faith built on blood, nature, evolution, destiny. People will realize they are all born with a wyrd, a doom, a pre-existing identity, and that they are part of a vast sea of genes that are all them, that the race is all in it together. It will be the religion of the race-soul. The acknowledgment of human differences, followed by an exploration of what it means to be a member of your group, followed by an enlightened adherence to the 'type' you learn you represent. The Platonic Ideal of Whiteness will become the hero in our literature, the person our genes are telling us to be, to become, to grow into. And our faith will be judging ourselves, and others, on how closely we approach these ideals. It is clear to me what the ideals of the white race soul are, and what the platonic white man is -- a vessel of truth, beauty, and love. That is our race soul, that is our new religion. That is our staff to lean on, and our afterlife to look upon, our purpose to fulfill, our reason for being, our all in all. It is everything religion ever provided, and reality cannot break it because finally, for once, it is reality.

Our new taboos, our new desecrations, would be treason to the race. Would be acting in a manner not becoming to our race. Dishonor and disloyalty will be the two charges everyone trembles under and fears. The two charges they will do anything to avoid. And two charges we will, with righteous indignation, enforce to the hilt, just like liberalism currently legislates its morality in hate crime laws, anti-discrimination laws, etc. You can tell what morality is prevalent by what is illegal. Don't bother with the libertarian crap about how everything should be legal. Every age has its religious taboos, has some behavior banned that makes no sense, except from a religious point of view. It can be eating pork, or cows. It can be wearing magic underwear, or hats. But the law is deadly serious about it all the same. White Nationalism will be deadly serious about our laws too. You can tell a serious person from a non-serious, by his willingness to enforce his values with deadly, and righteous, justice. If his convictions have not yet reached that point, you can dismiss him as a non-entity. Anyone who won't show up for the fight doesn't matter. He will simply obey those who do. Liberals are in deadly earnest, there are thousands of people currently in jail all across Europe for questioning their creed. The communists weren't. In the end, they couldn't shoot on their own people anymore. Liberals can. Muslims can. And serious white nationalists can too.

Our myths like 'the day of the rope,' are not going anywhere. They show we are deadly serious about enforcing our values on our people, on tabooing the taboo. That is the sign of a healthy, and powerful, religion. A community that will not rot or change with the tides of fashion, because too many people are still willing to kill and die to defend it. You have to admire Islam -- after 1400 years there are still suicide bombers and assassins killing and dying to enforce their taboos. Do not badmouth the Prophet, do not become a loose woman, etc. Communism was a total lightweight. It lasted 70 years. Liberalism is probably somewhere in between. It has a higher inner strength than communism, (or libertarianism for that matter. Who has ever been a martyr for cutting government spending?) but much less than Islam, and much less than nationalism. Nationalism mobilized all the nations of Europe and made them bleed each other in the tens of millions. I don't mean dragging civilians by the hair and shooting them in the back of the head -- communism can kill helpless people in large batches. But communism couldn't save the USSR from the Wehrmacht, they were simply surrendering across the entire front. Stalin had to appeal to the people's patriotism, he had to stoop and call his people 'brothers' over the radio. In fact, it is still called the Great Patriotic War over there. Likewise, patriotism is what drove the Nazis to fight against overwhelming odds on all fronts, throughout the entire war. They were always outnumbered, outgunned, and surrounded. It didn't matter, they were nationalists, and nationalism is strong. The people answer to its call. Wave a flag and sing a national anthem, and the effect is electric. Tears spring into people's eyes. Our faith is incredibly powerful. Liberals recognize this, that is why they spend 24/7 denouncing us, and no other opposition. That is why they fight us day and night, not their deracinated Republican foes, not the aracial color blind libertarians, no one but us. They are terrified of us. Specifically, the anti-semites. Why? Because we are the only serious people. The only determined people. Anti-semites are the people who withstand the test of character. They know it is impossible for any threats to emerge from a group too cowardly to even name the jew, or tell the honest truth, or proclaim their real beliefs for the world to see. How can I identify the 'serious' white nationalists? Just look at our two stories of revolution. One is by Pierce, the other by Covington. The only two authors who wrote glowingly about a race war to save the white race, were both anti-semites. If philo-semites were serious, they would have just as bloody a story of their own, only, it wouldn't involve any antisemitism. You would expect scenes of massive slaughter and carnage, of heroes breaking all moral taboos and creating their own law wherever they went, of selfless sacrifice for the race no matter what the price -- where are their stories? Nowhere. Only anti-semites write serious pro-white literature about a serious pro-white future. The philo-semites, simply by having no vision of the future, having not even a fantasy of victory, can instantly be identified as the already defeated. The already crushed in spirit. They won't show up at the muster. They'll be muttering about having too many 'bad elements,' and 'being too socialist,' and 'making us look bad,' even after the bullets start to fly. They are the crushed in spirit and they will sit on the sidelines the whole war long. They are cowards. I'd be fine with jews in my country, so long as they apologized for what they as a group have done in the past, marry whites, and their kids marry whites, and their kids marry whites, (and so on), and adopt the same faith as the rest of us -- clinging to no shred of separate identity the moment they take on citizenship. They will either be wholly a member of the community, or not in our community at all. Assimilate or leave.

We don't need jews. If they won't abide by our terms, fuck them. There are six times as many intelligent whites as intelligent jews, in America alone. We did just fine without them before they arrived in the late 1800's, and we'll do just fine after they're gone. We don't need you. We don't need your approval. We don't need your help. We don't need you. If you want to join, fine. But it will be on our terms, and in service to us. Not you, not your tribe.

The same goes for any other assimilable minority. If you bring something to the table, if you're a swell guy, fine. But you will marry a white, and your children will marry whites, and their children will marry whites, and so on. And you will abandon your identity at the door. You will be an honorary aryan and go by nothing else. Your loyalty will be to the white race and no one else. If you don't love us, if your heart doesn't swell with pride when you read the constitution, or look at our statues, or salute our flag -- then leave. Assimilate or leave. Don't create a space in the culture for you, don't make us include you, don't try to widen our horizons or broaden our exclusiveness. Fit in or leave. Even advocacy that our nation 'should really be more about x' or 'should really include more y's' would be treason and you'd be gone or strung up on the nearest lamp post, depending on our mood. We don't need you. You're here because a white person loves you, and you love a white person. That was your ticket in, that was the good faith we saw in you. If that good faith was simply a pretense, then so is our tolerance. Our forbearance is also a pretense, liable to snap at the first hint that something has gone wrong. If you aren't confident that you belong here, don't come.

Why jump through all these hoops instead of just ban non-whites outright? Because part of the white race soul is objectivity and fairness. If they really, truly, objectively, are more qualified than a white, and more loyal to whites than a white, if they are closer to the platonic ideal of the white race soul than a white is, it would be a betrayal of our nature to turn them away. And a white homeland needs to first and foremost abide by our inner nature, or the cognitive dissonance will a) stillbirth the nation as it does not appeal to the European race soul as worthy to fight for. b) create cognitive dissonance in our populace as we read all the sob stories of people discriminated against for no good reason, even if the nation were to succeed, and the stress of this cognitive dissonance would rot us from within. It would make people less loyal, and more doubtful, over who is really in the right, and who is the moral side.

That is a moral high ground we cannot leave to our opponents. We cannot leave any morality to our opponents. ALL morality, ALL of it, will belong to us. We will have an absolute monopoly on the entire heart of the white race. If there is some part of whites we are not serving, then we have failed them. As a reflection of the white race soul, we must accept the white race's verdicts -- and one of them is fairness, objectivity, merit -- to set up standards, and judge people as individuals, not ahead of time, not summarily, not as a group.

This does not mean we can't have standards. We can have extremely high standards, standards that invalidate 99.9999% of all nonwhites and jews. So long as they are applied fairly and evenly, so long as there is a standard that can conceivably be met, whites will feel reassured that we are in the right and have the moral high ground. Citizenship being earned through love of country and adherence to its laws does not strike people as unfair. People being turned away, families being broken up, patriots who supported us from the beginning being less qualified than illiterate hillbillies -- that will break us, not them. Liberals would just love that. They'd focus all their cameras on it. It would be our undoing. That is not a moral high ground I am willing to cede.

Communism is the weakest belief system, it lasted the shortest time, because it couldn't deliver on very simple promises and was exposed for a fraud immediately. Conservatism used to be strong, but now that Christianity has been exposed as absurd, with no divine retribution, no miracles, no cures outside of modern medicine, no reward for being Christian, with the origin of the universe and life and intelligence being explained by science, the religion is dead and the rats are leaving the ship. Likewise, all that nonsense about small government, liberty, low taxes, and so on is anemic and pathetic. It hasn't had any power since the articles of confederation and it's never coming back. People Want a strong government. They Want a society that looks after them and protects them. They Want to be part of something bigger than themselves. The only people who argued for liberty were just liars who were really fighting for race. Whether it was the Confederacy, the State's Rights movement opposed to desegregation, or the tax cutters who want to give less welfare to minorities, it is always just a veiled position on race. Racism Lite can never compete with principled, determined Racism. It can't even compete with liberalism. The sooner it dies the better.

Liberalism is strong for now, but it is built on a foundation of sand -- the scientific belief in the equality of mankind. Once that is dis-proven, it will be in the exact same situation that Christianity finds itself in today. The old people will cling to it, the young will mock it and discard it for good. All of society will be searching desperately for a new direction, this time founded on the truth.

Islam carries with it a poison pill -- its lack of innovation means it will always be scientifically, and thus militarily and economically, weak. Anyone with brains and courage can smash it in direct conflict. Islam has relied on the cowardice of its opponents, whose principles were not strong enough or coherent enough to stop their extremely principled and extremely focused goal of world conquest. It will break on the rocks of white nationalism. We are smarter, we are more ruthless, we are more innovative, we are more flexible, we are everything they can never be. If Islam attempted to fuck with a white nationalist Europe-Russia-America axis, God help them.

And so we arrive at nationalism. Looking at the European elections, we're around 10% of the populace already. In the past, we had total power. Science cannot discredit our claims because we are right. Our countries can't collapse because countries only collapse due to diversity. We cannot lose a war because nationalism creates the greatest warriors of all. Our economy can't collapse because we are devoted to science, genius, and equity. Our fertility can't collapse because we will require marriage and children. Our morals won't collapse because we will use censorship, education, and law to train our people onto another path. Our genome won't collapse because we will employ eugenics. Our government won't collapse because our nobility will enforce an unchanging constitution. Nationalism has no weaknesses, it only falls to an even more powerful nationalism. That's what sunk the Germans in World War I and World War II. If not for the same nationalist fervor in the hearts of their Russian, British, French, and American foes, they would have conquered the world. Nationalists DID conquer the world. Only after the European powers had conquered the whole world, did they fall to bickering amongst each other for the spoils. The most foolish, greedy, short sighted wars ever fought. But nevertheless, proof positive that nationalism is the strongest system on earth. All attempts to replace it will fail. Meanwhile, all other system's failures will be replaced by nationalism. It happened last time society was in disorder, it will happen again. It can't happen any other way.

Because the Beauty of the White Aryan Woman Must Not Perish From the Earth:

There's a great thread on Stormfront, http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?p=6911744.

They say a picture is worth a thousand words. So maybe a thousand pictures is worth a million words. A million reasons why the white race must live. Some of these girls are famous, some aren't. The point is, they're extremely beautiful, and if their genes are mixed with any other race, that beauty will be lost forever. The genes for these faces, these eyes, this hair, are all recessive. If mixed in with non-whites, they'll never appear again. The beauty of the white race is too high a price to pay for 'diversity,', 'enrichment,' 'vibrancy,' ethnic foods, 'tolerance,' or whatever the code word for genocide is today.

It isn't asking much to have a homeland where we can protect the beauty of our race, no more and no less than what we grant every last red-spottled peckingbird and northwest blue-tipped moth. The UN predicts whites will be only 2% of world population by the end of the century. Not a single country on Earth is reserved for us, a place we can call our own. They must all be shared. We must become the minority in every single one. Every other people gets their own homeland, where their unique genome is preserved, but we are required to give away every single one of ours. This is genocide, it is intentional, and there is nothing 'fair' or 'loving' about it.

These women don't need to be 'enriched.' They are fine as is. What they need to be is protected. If we aren't willing to fight for this, we aren't willing to fight for anything:

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Patience

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr57/nvsr57_14.pdf

Like the article on crime, I want white nationalists to realize just how minor our problems are today. Only by showing how minor, over-exaggerated, and inflated the arguments for white nationalism are today, can we understand why the sheeple do nothing and never respond to our concerns. It is the curse of intelligent people to have longer future time horizons than stupid people. We can see the future just as clearly as everyone else can see their immediate surroundings. To us, the future is already now, because it is already visible. But for them, it is invisible, it is infinitely far away, it would be like someone next to them announcing "Hey, I can see Paris from here! Wow, what a gorgeous day they're having."

Instead of admitting that their partner must have extremely good eyesight, they scoff and declare we can't see Paris. We can't see the future. Because the majority of people can see in color, we label those who don't see in color, 'color-blind.' They are the ostracized ones, the rejects. But imagine if only a few mutants could see in color. Whenever they said, "I can see colors. Look, the sky is blue, and grass is green," The majority color-blind population would scoff and call them deranged or liars. The sighted would be ostracized and rejected. Being intelligent is being a member of this sighted minority. Only one person in a thousand is as intelligent as me (140 IQ), and yet, I'm not even that smart. I know tons of people who are much smarter than me, friends and family, and great men of the past besides. This means that dumb people aren't just slightly dumb, I'm slightly dumb -- they're incredibly dumb. The mediocre, 100 IQ, 115 IQ, 85 IQ people could be described as color blind. They cannot see the future like we can, and they don't even believe it exists. They would rather demonize and suppress us, then allow us to lead on the basis of invisible forces they cannot understand. The intelligent are like priests and prophets, they deal with invisible, God-like forces beyond mortal comprehension. We are the interface between mankind and the invisible phenomena that control the world. Talking about thermodynamics, physics, chemistry, biology, and ethics to these people is about as meaningless gibberish as speaking in tongues or in Latin during Church. They might feel comforted that the 'priests are at work, and heaven has been pacified, the giant car gods will keep the engines running when we turn the key thanks to their intercession,' but they cannot comprehend what we are saying, or what the connection is between modern civilization and the fields intelligent people study and describe. There is such an absurd disconnect, that stupid people now use genetic testing to identify criminals and ancestors, but reject that same genetic testing when it shows A) our shared ancestry with other life forms, B) our evolved genetic differences between the races.

This is the same as using the car to get to work every day, but rejecting the principles of thermodynamics that make our engines run. It is absurd, and it is dangerous. If these stupid people are allowed to influence politics, they could well ban all cars, by somehow labeling the principles of thermodynamics heretical and evil. What they have done instead, is ban eugenics and discrimination, two blows whose long-term consequences, but not short-term, are the complete annihilation of the white race. To intelligent people, the moment you order the principles of thermodynamics to no longer be used, we say, "but this would mean banning cars." No one else sees it that way. They say that's nonsense, that's just scare-mongering. Look, there are cars everywhere. Likewise, when people ban eugenics and discrimination, open up our borders and encourage anyone who wants to have children with anyone who wants at public expense, intelligent people say, aghast, "But this means the annihilation of the white race. What you're calling for is the most massive genocide in history." Then stupid people scoff and say that's nonsense, it's just scare-mongering. Look, there are whites everywhere.

Short of a coup by the shadow elites, the only way to teach stupid people the truth about these matters, is to let things happen. Eventually even stupid people will be able to see what we already see, by virtue of the time horizon becoming closer. Just as those with bad eyesight can eventually see the same things as those with good eyesight, once they get close enough, stupid people will eventually see the same truths smart people did, once the future gets close enough. Waiting on stupid people to see the same things smart people do is extremely frustrating, because it means there is no advantage in being smart. I can see the future first, but no one will believe me until they can see it. This means I may as well have had as bad eyesight as them, because nothing will change until that threshold of eyesight is reached. Evolutionarily, intelligence allowed people with long future sight the ability to predict and avoid disasters. For instance, if a beach's water suddenly receded, smart people would think, "This is dangerous, I'm leaving." While stupid people would say 'hey neat,' and go collect starfish as the tsunami rolls in. If smart and stupid people watch a giant block of ice fall into one side of the lake, while they're standing on the other side, smart people think, "The ripple of that water from the impact is right now crossing the lake, it will soon reach this side and drown us, I need to run." Stupid people will think, "hey, that's pretty, wow." Not in the least aware that water of the same lake is linked to each other, and what happens to one side eventually impacts the other side as well.

Unfortunately, the nature of our problem does not allow smart people to avoid this disaster. Smart people are just as endangered by mass immigration as dumb people. No matter where we run inside the country, we are still subject to the law code constructed by our diverse overlords. They can rob us, rape us, steal our children, and kill us, and there's nothing we can do to stop them. The communists, in fact, specifically sought out the smart people and killed them first, wherever they came to power. Smart people cannot avoid risk when the threat is the entire assembled community they live among turning on them. The likelihood of our community turning on us increases, the less racial solidarity we have with our fellow countrymen. It approaches near 100% certainty, when we allow races with age-old ethnic grievances to become our masters: hispanics (we stole their land and genocided the Indians) blacks (slavery and jim crow) jews (the holocaust), asians (colonialism, discrimination), muslims (Palestine, the Iraq war, being infidels in general), everyone has their reason to hate us. Everyone is itching for a chance at revenge.

At this point I'd rather be ruled by alien invaders than fellow humans of any other race. They all hate us and have it in for us. They say so openly and brag about what they'll do once they come to power. We already know the jewish modus operandi, the USSR told us what will become of dissident intellectuals. It's the gulag or the shot to the back of the head for us. We already know that the gringos will be cleansed from Atzlan, and hispanics won't be content until we 'go back to Europe.' We already know what blacks intend to do once they get in power -- one long riot of torture, rape, and murder like the LA riots -- they'll drag us out of our trucks and throw bricks at our head, or kidnap us while we're on a date, rape both the man and the woman indiscriminately, pour bleach on us, throw us in a trash bag, and then have a hearty breakfast of ham and eggs together as we slowly suffocate.

And as civilized as Asians appear, we have to remember that just 50 years ago, these were the same Japanese who murdered millions of chinese and ruthlessly executed our prisoners of war during WW II. These are the same Chinese who murdered tens of millions of their own people for holding 'bad thoughts,' and specifically targeted the intelligentsia during the cultural revolution. These are the same Cambodians who took everyone out of the cities and left them to die in open fields, killing everyone who wore glasses as 'bourgeois,' and then cut out their livers and ate them during the communist revolution. Asians are chillingly heartless people. They still eat cute animals like dogs and abuse animals regularly without any hint of empathy or compassion. If there were some ideological justification for cutting us down, Asians as a group would all gather around and do it, as coldly and mechanically as whatever convinced them to kill their own people fifty years ago. Personally, I feel much safer among my own people. People who love me, because I'm just like them. People who share genes with me, so have no evolutionary desire to stamp me out. People who share a language, history, culture, and looks with me, so they do not feel threatened by me, or have any particular animus towards me for not fitting in. Jewish and Asian genocides have killed far more people than black crime ever has. Being among high IQ people is no protection. Only being around people who love you is safe. Everything else is a recipe for disaster. Mind you, there are individuals among the other races who do love us, and they should be dealt with on a case by case basis -- but they should not hold us hostage, or require we all die just so as not to incur the risk that we might mistreat them. People of good heart and good intentions, if we unfairly discriminate against them, would say, "I understand this is for the survival of the white race, whom I love, and therefore I forgive you." If they don't have a good heart or good intentions, we owe nothing to them anyway. There is no moral reason why a few good apples require we accept barrels and barrels of bad apples and rot our entire genome to corruption, depravity, and death. The crime done to white people by not discriminating at all, is far worse than the crime done to non-whites by discriminating too rigorously. Anyone who says otherwise is no longer a compassionate humanist trying to objectively lower the pain in the world, but a lying, mendacious ethnic warrior (or race traitor if they are white) who is just saying whatever it takes to keep us disarmed and supine while they go about their slow and steady slaughter.

As for muslims, we only need to see how ruthlessly they strangle out all minorities to see what they would do. When muslims first conquer a region, it is primarily non-muslim. But slowly and surely, the native culture is wiped out. The ancient Persian religion is nearly gone in Iran. The hindus have been driven out of pakistan and Bangladesh. The christians of the middle east are nearly eliminated. The greeks of asia minor ethnic cleansed from what is now Turkey. And the serbs driven out of their historic land of Kosovo. Islam does not brook dissent and it does not allow intellectual progress. While northwest Europe was going through the Renaissance, the Age of Discovery, and the Enlightenment -- while Europe was discovering the laws of math, electricity, steam, perspective, chords and melodies, cannons, vaccines, and inventing the modern world -- the Ottoman Empire did nothing. While Europe had invented the printing press and was churning out classics for the entire populace to read, study, and admire, the Ottoman Empire did nothing. Massive numbers of whites lived within the borders of the Ottoman Empire. The genetic potential of the Ottomans to participate in this progress, to at least mimic and adopt the progress being made around them, was entirely possible. However, all the whites who lived under Islam were completely unproductive. They made no invention, they made no art, they made no science, they made nothing.

In other words, Islam cannot achieve anything itself, and anyone it conquers is equally ruined, regardless of what quality they would have shown had they lived under anything else but Islam. Islam is so destructive that nothing survives in its wake. Just look at the living standards and nobel prizes of any majority muslim state. It now makes up one quarter of the human population and is spreading on all continents. Isolationism and individualism cannot oppose a force this powerful. Libertarianism has no answer to the threat of Islam. Only white racial solidarity creates a bloc of power strong enough to impede the progress of this menacing force. It has to exist across all of Europe, all of Russia, and all of North America, at least to the extent that we Americans do not interfere with Europe as they take the drastic actions necessary to save themselves. Like usual, smart people around the world are crying out with all their might about the threat of Islam and the future in an Islamic state. As usual, people in the present say this is nonsense, there are non-muslims all around them, and Islam isn't currently in power, so there's nothing to fear. Describing the future to stupid people is like describing colors to the blind. It's just impossible. It's like banging your head against a wall.

What we can do is make a clear record of both our warnings before the calamity happens, and our solutions for how to avoid it/overcome it. Once the worst has come to pass, there will be one golden, shining, brilliant moment, when the collective stupid sheeple of mankind get on their knees, admit we were right from the start, and beg for guidance. Beg us to take control and save them and set things right, in just the manner we said we needed to. This one, tiny, sliver of opportunity, will be at the hair's breath between us and extinction. They will ignore the problem until it can no longer be ignored, they will turn to smart people's guidance and direction, the people who were right all along, at the last second, and then one second before we would be totally exterminated, intelligent white people will finally have the collective power of their community to wield in constructing an utopia instead. It has happened before -- when Jamestown was on the brink of extinction, it turned to the strong leadership of John Smith. When Germany had fallen to ruins, it turned to the strong leadership of the Nazis. Chile had Pinochet. France had Napoleon. England had Cromwell. Russia had Lenin. Rome had Augustus, Vaspasian, and Constatine. In times of turmoil, strong leaders are finally welcomed by the people, and in the space of a few years, they effect revolutionary change on their societies. They completely overturn all previous trends and create a new world, nothing like what came before.

A time of incredible turmoil, as bad as the French Revolution, the Russian Revolution, the 1930's Weimar Germany, the American Revolution, the time of troubles, or any other period in world history, is coming. The storm is coming. History has taught us that with every time of turmoil, a strong leader is chosen by the people to steer them out of it, and their will is bent like heated iron to the new mold. Only terrible calamities can loosen people's hearts, weaken people's wills, to stop and listen to their betters. To their superiors. To their natural born leaders. Then the people can be reforged, in the heat of peril and adversity, into a shining new republic more beautiful than anything has been for centuries. (Until long use and rust cycle it back to ruin again.)

This is why it's so important to tell the truth now. To establish credibility, not with the present age, which will always mock and scorn us, but with the future age, when they look back and see we were right all along. If we are the same dissembling liars as everyone else, we cannot emerge as the voice of guidance and reason when the calamity appears. When people look back to see who had predicted this, who was right all along, who was telling them the truth instead of honeysweet lies, they will find -- who? Sarah Palin? Angela Merkel? Or straight forward, truth telling, plain dealing people who do not flinch at words like 'We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.'

This is why we must reject Christianity root and branch. Not because it makes us more popular. Because Christianity is a lie. This is why we must entertain conspiracy theories and revisionism. Not because it makes us more popular, but because the truth is more complicated than people are being led to believe. This is why we must oppose and hate jews. Not because it makes us more popular. But because the jews really do hate and oppose us. No matter what we pretend otherwise, their voting records, their media outlets, their campaign donations, their organizations (ADL, SPLC, ACLU) all tell the same story. We must not allow popularity, or pure squeamishness and fear of ostracism, to derail us in the world of today. Because we are not fighting to be heard in the world of today. We are fighting to be heard in the future, when people will be desperate for the truth, and will only follow the one group brave enough, confident enough, and principled enough to hold steady from start to finish, and do whatever must be done, and say whatever must be said, and believe whatever must be believed. It is a test of character. It is a test of character whether people accept the holocaust, despite the fact of our never finding any documents, any gassed bodies, any mass graves, any photographs, any effective gas chambers or crematoria, any prussian blue stains, any anything that would indicate a Holocaust really occurred. If people can be browbeaten into admitting the holocaust on the basis of such flimsy evidence, simply out of fear of ostracism, they certainly can't lead us a century from now, when courage will be everything and truth our only salvation.

For the same reason, we MUST be atheists. We cannot live in a fairy land when our adherence to Truth, and our Neitzschean will to power, will be the difference between life and death. If we peddle the same old lies, the same old truisms, what hope do we have of separating from the pack? If we all go to heaven after we die anyway, what's the point in struggle? What's the point in resistance? What's the point in trying to survive? If love your neighbor as yourself really is the golden rule, the absolute law above all others in morality, why should we value ourselves more highly than others? Why should we hurt others to save ourselves? Why should we do anything but be the blessed meek, poor, and downtrodden, who when slapped, turn the other cheek?

Of course holding to the truth is painful. Of course belonging to a minority of a minority of a minority is painful. Only those willing to suffer pain should be allowed to inflict it. This is a test of our character, of our devotion. If we are willing to hurt others to achieve our goals, we must be willing to hurt ourselves twice as much. When the storm does come, people will want to know who is brave, who is true, and who is strong. It will not be hypocrites, dissemblers, moderates, cowards, or fairy tale peddlers. It will be the truth tellers. The people who went wherever the Truth led, no matter how high the price, and told everyone else what lay on the other side. It doesn't even have to mean we are more accurate, more right, in our opinions than others. That is mere humbug. What it means is that we were inspired by a love of truth in everything we said, whereas the inspiration of other people when they spoke was not truth, but always some mean, base material motivation that only happened to be right, like a broken clock twice a day. It means that if we believe something, we say it, and not something else. That is our test of character. That is what it means to deserve victory, to deserve the mantle of leadership, to deserve followers.

Hitler didn't receive much support in 1924 during the beer hall putsch. Nevertheless, the same person who was not granted leadership then, was elected to become Germany's leader in 1933. Why? Because he had not swerved from his course in between. Just because what we say now does not get us into power now, doesn't mean what we are saying is wrong, or we should start saying something different. If you want to get into power, the best thing you could do is become a democrat, second best, would be to become a republican. We don't want power at the price of principle. What we want is power to enforce our principles. That power cannot exist if we aren't given legitimacy, given the reins of leadership, under the program our principles call for. We must wait for the people to come to us, we cannot go to them, without losing the sacred ground, the haven, the refuge, we have built for ourselves and them. It is like standing in a magic circle of salt, with ghosts and spirits floating all around, and calling out to people to come inside, to come inside the magic circle, where it is safe. The people disagree, they urge us to leave the circle and join them. They say they'll follow us wherever, so long as we first leave the magic circle. This does not save the people, it only dooms ourselves along with them. No matter what, we must stay in the magic circle, where the demons and spirits cannot reach us. All we can do is wait for others to listen to us, and come to us. To where we stand. To the ramparts of courage that cannot be breached and the fortress of wisdom that cannot be stormed. It is the only safe place on Earth.

Neitzsche was never even popular at any point in his life. He was never recognized, he died lonely, unmarried, insane. Today he is recognized as one of the greatest 10 philosophers to have ever lived in history. Tomorrow, who knows, his reputation might even be higher. Nietzsche was the first to realize that Christianity was an attack by the jews on Rome -- the white race. An undermining of our principles and values that made us strong, and a corruption that had ruined the white race and rendered us incapable of self-defense against any other group. When people list the crimes jews have committed against whites, importing that awful religion has to come at the very head. When people discuss the extent of jewish power, the 2 billion people who mindlessly worship and believe an entirely jewish concoction must be counted as their greatest strength of all. White Nationalists are too afraid to point this out, for fear of upsetting Christians. This won't do. Idiots who attack Christians, but praise jews, and idiots who attack jews, but praise Christians, are both alike in dignity. Christianity is the jewish extended phenotype. The Vikings, the Greeks, the ancient Germanic tribes, and the Romans who battled them, are our extended phenotype. They are what whites produce under their own guidance, under their own beliefs, under their own culture, in their own native soil. White Nationalists should feel closer to the native products of our own people than the foreign imports of our greatest and longest foe, who has done nothing but undermine, betray, and exploit us ever since we met. Who opened the gates to Constantinople? The jewish quarter. Who opened the gates to Seville to the Muslims? The jews. Who, whom? Who, whom? Who opened the gates to the 1965 immigration into America? The jews. Jews have done nothing but open gates to our enemies for the last two thousand years. For God's sake, it's time we caught on to their game.

Regardless, what I mean to say is that present popularity does not predict future impact. We should not sacrifice future impact to present popularity. That is suicide. It's abject surrender. Our movement has nothing to do with the present, it is about saving the future. The future of the white race, the future of our children, and the future of mankind.

Now, turning to the link I provided: we find that 776.5 people died in 2006, per 100,000. Or .78%. Out of those 776.5, we recall from last post that 6 of them were murdered. Leaving the other 771 dead to other causes. Why would people be worried about murder in the United States, a mere .7% of the total deaths that year?

When we scroll down to the meat of the study, page 5, we get a table of the causes of death and the percentages thereof:

Heart Disease, 26%. Cancer, 23%. Stroke, 5.7%. Chronic Lower Respiratory Disease (80% of which is caused by smoking): 5.1%. Accidents: 5%. Diabetes: 3%. Alzheimer's: 3%. Flu: 2.3%. Kidney Disease: 1.9%. Sepsis (Inflammation due to infections:) 1.4%. Suicide: 1.4%. Liver Disease: 1.1%. Hypertension: 1%. Parkinson's Disease: .8% Homicide: .8%. Everything Else: 18.5% (I wonder if drug overdoses is included here, or in 'accidents'? I wish the table were more detailed, but I guess this is all we get.)

Now, if you're a public policy maker, and you're worried about present day America, what should be your priorities? #1, obesity. #2, smoking. #3, car accidents, drugs, workplace dangers, safety in general. #4: stem cells, so that we can cure alzheimer's and other diseases. Suicide and homicide don't even enter the picture. People aren't miserable enough to kill themselves, so obviously solving problems like atomization, broken homes, and adultery are not important. Murder isn't common, so obviously stuff like minority crime and rioting is not important.

Sure enough, we find Congress thinking about one thing, and one thing only, in America today. Health Care! How to provide more health care, cheaper, and better than before, to save all these people from needless death. Very noble of them, but like usual, with an incredibly short time horizon. No one is asking where we are going to get the money to pay for this. No one is asking how we can afford health care with an aging demographic. No one is asking why we should spend more money preventing deaths instead of encouraging new births. Because all of that is an issue for the future, for the invisible beyond. The people understand their worries and their concerns of the day -- health care! Diabetes! Cancer! They will wear plenty of ribbons and go on plenty of marches for those causes. But no one will rally to fight crime, or stop adultery, or increase fertility. All of these problems are minor today, and only become calamitous in the future. They are invisible to the crowds. And here we have the gall to tell people that they must sacrifice their current concerns, their current priorities, for the sake of improving our situation in the future. That they must forgo free health care, so that they can afford to have more children using the citizen's dividend. That they must give in to cancer, so that the cancer of dysgenics doesn't wipe out modern civilization. That we can do nothing about brain strokes, because what really matters is what our kids are learning in school. We are like the grinch who stole Christmas. We are no fun at all. All we say is give, give, give, do, do, do, and the reward is always in some indeterminate future, that they'll probably never see.

That isn't a strong position to argue from. Though I do think it is a winner for white nationalists to slam down on vice. The real killers in the world are alcohol induced drunk driving, smoking, obesity -- vice. If we legislated against vice, we would have the healthiest people on Earth, with the longest lived, highest quality of life, and the cheapest health care costs imaginable. So very simple. And yet so impossible, so long as we believe individual freedom is more important than the general welfare. That is just one instance of how the whole can be made better by a sturdy discipline of the parts. It is also why libertarians are such false friends. They really have nothing to do with us. Just because they are also opposed to the status quo, doesn't mean there is any room whatsoever for their beliefs or plans in our country. They are more like a hyperdegenerate version of the country we already have. They aren't the cure, they are more like the principled extreme of what is already killing us. Too much freedom, too little responsibility.

But imagine a world where not .8%, but 20% of people die by homicide. Imagine another 20% die by suicide. Imagine not 20% of people are unemployed, but 80% of people are unemployed. Imagine hell. Or Detroit. People's priorities, at this point, will shift away from breast cancer, and towards civic regeneration. It cannot be otherwise. For the same reason people are only concerned with heart attacks today, they will only be concerned with black attacks tomorrow. And the only people with the answer will be those evil white nationalists they disparaged from the start.

The liberals will say 20% homicides is a small price to pay for our enriching, vibrant diversity. The libertarians will say 80% unemployment is a small price to pay for our free market economy. The Christians will say this is all because we didn't have faith and the solution is to pray to God and repent our sins. And the people, utterly disheartened, will sneer in contempt at every single bullshit phrase that leaves their mouth, and they'll ask themselves, WHO, WHO, WHO is prepared to save us? Who is prepared to give me a better life? Who is telling me the truth? Who is brave enough to act? Who wants change? Who has a plan? Who has a solution? Who is willing to help me?

The only people who meet that criteria will be us. We are the only ones with a plan. We are the only ones who can help the average joe achieve a better life. We are the only ones with a solution to the problems of the future. We are the only ones not mouthing platitudes and truisms, fiddling while Rome burns. And they'll flock to us, like they always do -- johnny come latelies, probably blaming us for not convincing them earlier, and complaining about how we should make all sorts of changes once they're on board. But they'll come, they'll follow, and we will prevail. I just cannot see any other movement or philosophy delivering us from the woes of tomorrow. In a multiple choice question, simply by eliminating all other options, the last answer must be the correct one. People will bubble in 'white nationalism' on their scantrons, and dreams will become reality.

What else could possibly happen? Does anyone imagine Christianity could save our country? That non-discrimination will usher in an age of abundance and good will for all? That freedom will mean everyone suddenly starts making the right decisions for themselves, unlike the last fifty years where they have made nothing but mistakes? That democracy will vote in the perfect bipartisan government that defeats the very debt they caused? The wars they got us into? The social programs they originally passed? The taxes they originally raised? Come now. It's impossible. There is one small possibility, that technology will simply invent away all our problems. I have perfect respect for anyone who suggests that. But supposing it doesn't, there is nowhere else people could turn. All other ideologies are bankrupt and completely incapable of handling the problems of tomorrow. All of them. They are so absurdly, laughably wrong, that they will collapse like a house of cards. All of them. And if everything else collapses and we are still standing, like the three little pigs, the remainder will all run to take shelter under us. It's just natural. It can't proceed any other way.

All we have to do is make our stand, and stick to it. Persevere, and wait. Victory is inevitable, because we are the only people who believe the truth, and reality answers to the truth. As in, all nations not built on truth, collapse to reality. Leaving only one people, one idea, one movement left -- the one that's built on truth. It's just tautologically so. When the time is right, we will be given power, and we will build our new homeland, our utopia, and it will be the stuff of dreams. It will be worth all the pain, all the rejection, all the frustration, all the bullshit that came before. It will redeem humanity and show why life even exists at all. It will be our gateway to the stars. It's worth waiting for. It's worth persevering for. It's worth staying true to. It's worth not compromising or negotiating away. It's worth our lives, our fortunes, and our sacred honor.

2012 Review

So I just watched the movie '2012.' It was entertaining, I suppose, but only in that morbid way that perhaps boys dissecting frogs and worms enjoy during science class.

The problem with the story was the number of unspoken assumptions that were extremely liberal and soul-destroying. The second problem was the number of spoken lines that endorsed liberal, soul-destroying values. Like, "We're all children of the earth." and "All religions share the same basic values." This God damned refrain about universality, sameness, one-ness, when obviously there are enormous differences between the peoples of the Earth and their beliefs, that have resulted in enormous differences in our living standards and culture, some of which are far superior to others. If we lose sight of that, we risk losing the Sistine Chapel and the Eiffel Tower to the mud hut and the shanty town. Why can't people recognize how important our DIFFERENCES are? Far more important than any similarities we might share? It is our differences that define us, that shape our identity. It is how we are different from inanimate matter, not what similarities we share, that makes us alive. It is how we are different form non-sentient beings, not what similarities we share, that make us human. And it is how we are different from primitives, not what similarities we share, that make us civilized.

Another basic problem with the movie was the main character was divorced. He had to compete for his ex-wife and children's love with an absolute nobody named Gordon. He barely got to see his family, and when he did, Gordon was jealous and constantly trying to interfere and minimize what contact he had. Jackson (the name of the main character) had already lost his son, who just called him by his name, Jackson, and said they weren't family anymore. His daughter still loved him, but she was obviously so traumatized by the divorce, that she still wet her bed every night, even at age 7.

Why had this woman, Kate, divorced him? Why had she destroyed the lives of her young son and daughter? Why had she abandoned her husband to the wolves of lonely bachelorhood, and heart-rending separation from his children who have been turned against him? Because, she says, "He had tunnel vision." He spent too much time on his work, writing, and didn't pay enough attention to her. That's right. He didn't cheat on her. He didn't beat her. He didn't have a drinking problem. He wasn't in jail. He didn't even call her a bad name. He had "tunnel vision." That's all it takes for a woman to destroy her family today, and guiltlessly, shamelessly, blame it on the man. I hate her and the world that made her. She is the source of 90% of all human misery on the earth today.

The movie conveniently kills off Gordon, letting Jackson reunite with his family. But that only happens in movies. In real life, the pain would have just gone on and on, forever. The children would have grown up, married, and divorced themselves, for equally specious reasons. As would their children, on and on. Each learning from their parents how to ruin their own lives, and not knowing any better than they had been taught. Furthermore, Kate never had to apologize, or even admit that what she had done had hurt anyone. Because Gordon conveniently died, she never had to face the fact that the true father of her kids was banished, even though he was infinitely superior both as a husband and a father than his replacement, and still loved them with all his heart -- and all because of her. Instead, the world just magically makes sure that the one person who deserves to be in pain, is the one person who never feels it. Jackson feels it, Gordon feels it, the kids feel it -- but she never does. She never has to answer for what her actions have caused. It's just a free ride from start to finish. No one even rebukes her for what she's done.

My next problem is the ending. The survivors of mankind are a complete mishmash of all races, languages, and cultures. They all connect together and decide to dock in South Africa, "humanity coming back to its cradle," and apparently will form a new, more perfect union of mankind as one nation. The christian, western calendar is erased and everything has started over at year 1. You get the feeling that the liberals want a disaster like this to occur. It killed two birds with one stone: First, it saved the environment by ridding the Earth of its pestilent overpopulation, reducing humanity from 7 billion to 400,000. Second, the 400,000 were from all peoples and places, forever eradicating all borders and conflicts between the survivors. It would be a one-world government in harmony with nature from here on.

Think how horrifying it would have been to the liberal mind if America had learned of this coming disaster, secretly built an 'ark' to preserve only high IQ white people, and had ridden out the storm whereas the rest of the world died. Then we could dock in Rome and declare, "At last the world belongs to us, clean of all mud people, forever." Then an inspirational Ride of the Valkyries by Wagner and eagle banners being unfurled and the closing credits. LOL. The howls of hatred and indignation. And yet, that would be a far better outcome than this global metissage the movie portrayed, which is just as horrifying to my eyes.

But there was another interesting choice made. At first we were told there were secret spaceships being built. If they had been space ships, then each spaceship, the Chinese, the Japanese, the European, the American, could have launched into space and separated, colonizing their own planet in some star far far away. It would have been an incredibly hopeful story, where people could finally separate and would never have to deal with diversity again. But the liberals hate that idea, they never want to leave the earth. Instead they force us to stay in 'arks' that are seaworthy, but not spaceworthy. Then when the crisis ends, they all dock together and unload their passengers in one spot, where they will be united forever as one nation, under Mud. What a revolting surprise twist. I suppose people could argue that we don't have the technology to build space ships yet, and this was more realistic. But when dealing with fantasy, people can craft whatever dreams they want. The fact is we were sold the liberal dream instead of the dreams of Heinlein, Asimov, and E.E Doc Smith.

All I can say is American media cannot give us good dreams, good inspirations, or good aspirations. We must either sink deep into our past to find literature and movies worth viewing, or we must look abroad, to the land of the Rising Sun (Code Geass comes to mind.) Or, you can read the Northwest Quartet by Harold Covington. In there you can find all the inspiration, family values, utopian future, and heroic white men AND women you couldn't find in 2012. How I'd love to see a movie made of THAT. Maybe once we've won. ^_^.

Capitalism, Pros and Cons:

IQ and the Wealth of Nations is a very good book. It basically looks at the per capita GDP of every country on Earth, and finds two defining factors that each account for about 1/2 of GDP. The level of freedom in the economy, and the IQ of the people. As economic freedom grows, so too does per capita GDP.

Singapore is one of the freest, smartest countries on Earth. Go figure, it's also one of the richest. The USA is dumber than Europe and Japan, but because we have lower taxes and fewer regulations, we earn tens of thousands of dollars per person more than them. It sounds like a slam dunk. How can anyone be against economic freedom when the results are so clear? When the data is in and capitalism has won?

Not so fast. There are more ways to look at an economy than per capita GDP. One is the GINI index. Basically, it doesn't really matter if the country is enormously wealthy, if only 1% of the country has any money, and everyone else is dirt poor. America has a higher level of poverty than countries that only have, in gross, 2/3 our GDP. America has something like 40 million uninsured people, whereas every other country offers public health care to all their citizens. America has higher unemployment and less job security once you are hired than the rest of the developed world.

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ee.html

EU: unemployment: 7.2% (2008 est.)
Japan: unemployment: 4% (2008 est.)

Gini Index: From least equal to most, USA comes in 44th, Japan comes in 74th, and the EU comes in 106th. (South Korea was just under it at 105th.) So basically, the rest of the developed world has a far better life for their poor than we do. We can blame this on our minorities, but that's not really the problem. There were practically no Hispanics in this country in the 1970's, and the poor were being shafted then too. In fact, even though worker productivity has risen 45% since the 1970's, worker's wages have not risen at all. Every single extra dime has simply gone into the deep pockets of the super rich. Vanished without a trace. The importation of hispanics is just one aspect of America's favoring of the rich over the poor -- by creating a massive supply of labor, they keep the price down and the poor screwed. Obviously this favoring of the rich over the poor had to exist ahead of time, for such a policy to be enacted in the first place.

Much of America's wealth is illusory, since we have yet to face the music of our outstanding obligations. Simply paying interest on this debt will eventually require our entire GDP. How are we richer than the EU or Japan then?

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

Just watching this clock tick is dizzying: The national debt per citizen is $39,000. This hasn't stopped Americans from recklessly spending on themselves either. Even more enormous is America's private debt:

$54,348 per citizen.

Contrast this to 'savings per adult' : $2,755. That's right, we are 20 times further in debt than we have savings. How is this sustainable? How can this possibly be considered part of GDP? Debt money is not real money, it is slavery. It is simply human bondage without the needless overhead that is foremen or whips.

But this one really takes the cake. Add up the projected costs of our social programs when the baby boomers retire: Social Security, Medicare, Bush's wonderful prescription drug plan, and now each citizen apparently will have to fork over $344,585 to pay our bills.

Add it all up and our country is now 135 trillion dollars in debt. Each individual's share is 437,887. This isn't the wealthiest country in the world. It's a debt wracked insane asylum.

So now we have three objections to capitalism: Poverty, Unemployment, and Debt are higher in countries with lower taxes and less regulation. The only thing that seems to be higher is raw GDP.

Paradoxically, we are told that in order to be the richest country in the world, we cannot afford health care, housing, college educations, or anything else to be funded by the government. Basically, to be rich, everyone is on their own -- and yet the net effect of this, is that instead everyone but a lucky few are poor. An incredible new study has come out, showing that 1/2 of all American children are on food stamps at some point in their life. http://www.wtop.com/?nid=106&sid=1801434 If 1/2 of families cannot even feed their children, we are not the richest country on Earth, regardless of what the GDP numbers say.

It actually reminds me of the Soviet Union. Every year, they would post 7% growth, talk about the economic boom, and about how the 5 year plan was working and everyone was bursting at the seams with exuberance. And yet, all we had to do was look at the endless Russian bread lines, waiting days in freezing temperatures for their meager ration, to see it was all a lie. Russia could no longer feed its own people -- it was bankrupt, whatever the numbers wizards at the top were saying. Today in America we are doing it all over again. "The richest country in the world," 1/2 of which have to stand in bread lines to gain their next meal. Give me a break.

If this is wealth, Singapore can keep it. I don't want to be wealthy anymore. I want the normal things in life: Health, jobs, food, shelter, education. The things we apparently cannot afford, if we are to be 'wealthy.' According to capitalists, the way to be wealthy is to never purchase anything with our wealth. As though we were in some sort of buddhist ascetic cult, our wealth corresponds directly to how much we 'save' by not 'wasting' it on 'luxuries' like health, food, or housing. As a nation, we are offering people voodoo numbers on paper, "look, America is wealthy! Look at our giant GDP! Boy the stock market sure is high today!" Instead of any actual goods or services -- health care, college education, affordable housing, jobs, anything.

This does not mean we have to raise taxes or pass more regulations. Actually, we could slash taxes and slash regulations. What it does mean is we need to be smarter about how America distributes its wealth. There is no reason to give so much money to so few people as the top 1%, anyone who earns over a million dollars in some bonus or other is just morally repulsive. I don't care how they earned it. All production stems from the natural resources of the earth and the collective human capital of the people, and no one can have a just monopoly of these fruits. Furthermore, money has a marginal utility. The first thousand dollars can keep you fed and save your life from a torturous death of wracking hunger or pitiful disease. The next can give you light, heat, and water. The next thousand can pay for transportation, entertainment, and a roof over your head. Once you get to a million dollars, what are you going to buy? A cool car? A yacht? Some shoes? No one on earth should have to go hungry for the sake of some rich person buying their 100th pair of shoes. It is a moral outrage. Human life is not worthless, but the enjoyments of the rich are. Any system that comes to the opposite conclusion in how it distributes its money, in what money is being used to buy, is evil and should be destroyed.

Likewise, there is no reason to fund so many failed social programs that don't deliver any real product to the recipients, and exist solely to employ the bureaucracy that oversees them. All of the socialist attempts to remove disparities in wealth are full of corruption, fraud, and waste. They are full of moral hazard. For instance, you can't receive welfare until you are a single mom. A married mom receives nothing. This is obscene. This is evil. For instance, name some program where money is given to the needy -- you will find more goes to paying the salaries of the government, than is ever actually given to those in need. Whereas charities manage to spend 90 cents on the poor and 10 cents on themselves, the government spends 90 cents on themselves and 10 cents on the poor. Most people agree, most people have agreed ever since the heart wrenching stories of Charles Dickens, that we should relieve the suffering of our poor as best we can. Unfortunately, this noble purpose has been hijacked by greedy parasites who divert the money to themselves. We all agree it is moral to help the poor, we already pay the taxes so that we can help the poor -- but the poor are never helped. They rot away in slums, in prisons, in homeless shelters and tent cities all across America all the same. Ever since LBJ declared a War on Poverty in America, we have spent trillions to try and help the poor. But somehow, the poverty rate has only increased. If we had simply HANDED EACH AND EVERY POOR PERSON A MILLION DOLLARS IN AMERICA, we could have solved poverty for all time, and saved money besides. But we didn't. Instead of the citizen's dividend, we have endless bureaucratic social programs -- H.U.D, social security, medicare, medicaid, welfare, blah blah blah.

Likewise, there is no reason to fund a military as large as the rest of the world combined, have army bases in 140 different countries, and wage a war on terror with a non-existent enemy that poses zero threat to our country. Assume 9/11 was caused by Islamic terror. Assume if we do nothing, they will cause a new 9/11 every 10 years (about the same gap between the first WTC bombing, and the plane attacks, where we were in fact doing nothing.) That's 3,000 dead every ten years, or 300 dead a year. We lose 40,000 people every year to car accidents, but no one has declared war on cars or invaded Japan to stop their rolling out of death-factory toyotas and hondas. "Any nation that harbors cars, supports cars, or builds cars, is also a car-killer. You're either with us, or you're against us." Why has sanity completely left us when it comes to terrorism? What are we so afraid of? Suppose they get a nuke and drop it on one of our cities -- the nukes they make are weak, weaker even than the ones we used on Hiroshima. Nevertheless, let's assume they kill 100,000 people! That's 2.5 years of car accidents. We have done nothing to prevent car accidents, and yet, they are 4 times as deadly as being nuked every 10 years. SO MUCH FOR THE WAR ON TERROR. God I hate the lies our media has fed our people. The insane, ridiculous spending on this war, while our people waste away at home, is the epitome of misplaced spending priorities.

Likewise, in a country bursting at the seams with oil, coal, uranium, wind, solar, and tidal energy supplies, it is outrageous that we spend hundreds of billions every year to buy power from abroad. Americans are spending enormous amounts on energy, money that is lost to our economy every year as it floats away to distant lands, not because we lack the energy and have no choice, but because environmentalists have denied us the fruits of our own soil. Offshore, enormous patches of oil belong to American coastal waters, that we cannot touch. Alaska cannot be developed because some caribou or another might be disturbed. Wind Turbines can't be built because it 'hurts the view.' Nuclear power plants can't be made because 'they might blow up.' Mind you, more people have died from mining coal in the last 50 years than all the nuclear power plant explosions in history, but let's ignore that and focus on sensationalism instead of cold facts. We can't extract natural gas or shale oil or do anything else, because Obama wants to get rid of all fossil fuels and impose a draconian cap and trade system that will send us into the new dark age. Obama insists we can not have food or heating for our houses, that this just 'isn't going to happen.': http://hotair.com/archives/2008/05/19/obama-lets-eat-less-so-that-we-can-lead-by-example-on-climate-change-by-eating-less/

AND I QUOTE: “We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times … and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK,” Obama said.

“That’s not leadership. That’s not going to happen,” he added.

America has vast natural resources. We probably have more than Russia, whose entire economy is based on natural resources. Instead of creating jobs and selling our incredible bounty to the rest of the earth for profit, all the while keeping energy costs low at home, we have Obama's plan to 'not eat all we want' and 'keep our houses unheated.' This is not wealth. Wealth is building a new nuclear power plant every year. Wealth is setting up a wind farm from north dakota all the way down to Texas. Wealth is paving the mojave desert in solar panels. Wealth is giving every citizen a free utility bill due to our ridiculous amounts of energy lying all around us that we could develop for nearly nothing. Cap and Trade is not wealth. The dark ages are not wealth. Famine is not wealth.

Likewise, a consumer economy is in and of itself, a misplaced priority. If spending were used to improve people's quality of life, instead of social status or hedonism, just think of the savings we could accrue! If there were such a thing as a 'dignified poor,' if people didn't have to be rich to afford a wife and family, or have their voices heard, or be admired for their abilities in other fields -- like say their virtue, their honesty, their intelligence, their wisdom, their kindness to others, their skill at sports or games, their devotion to Good, or their respect for these same traits in others -- all the money currently spent on fancy furniture, fancy clothes, fancy cars, fancy houses, fancy restaurants, fancy phones, fancy college degrees, and fancy God Knows What, could be distributed to the people for necessities instead. They say 70% of America's economy is 'consumer driven.' In other words, is based on nothing. No manufacturing, no farming, nothing of any use is going on. When 70% of your economy is based on absolutely nothing, you have a problem, but you also have an opportunity -- it means there is a vast surplus of wealth out there, which could go to a vast number of good causes. It could get us into space. . .or it could give us hair spray and lipstick. It could give us artificial intelligence. . .or it could give us moving talking toys that break after two weeks. It could give us bioengineering. . . or it could give us fast food. The fact that we have been wasting such incredible sums of wealth on utter crap, while giving our scientists and artists shoe string budgets that can't achieve anything, is simply a crime. And we wonder why there isn't any great science or art being done anymore!

This is just the tip of the iceberg. The easiest way to improve our lives would be to simply separate from the people who hurt us. The bankers at the top, the criminals at the bottom, and all the feminist voters inbetween. What vast sums of money could we save if we weren't paying for every single mother who couldn't bother to marry anyone and requires our support instead? For every druggee who can't get his act together? For every Bernie Madoff who hasn't been caught yet?

My point is this. Capitalism is just a tool. It's a way to make money. It makes more money than any other system. The more capitalist your society is, the more money you make. But money is worthless, wealth is worthless, if it isn't spent in a life-affirming, moral, and virtuous way. We as a community have a right to prioritize where we want our money to go. We as a community have a right to create moral standards about how money is invested, who it is given to, and what kind of products we should sell or buy. We as a community have a right to value things of no economic worth, and devalue things of high economic worth, based on a higher order of being than the soulless machinery of materialism. We as a community have a right to throw off the chains of debt, which is simply a modern form of slavery, that trap every single child born in our country with a crushing burden of 440 thousand dollars owed before they take their first step. We as a community have a right to FORM a community, a community consisting of, for the sake of, and run by ourselves. Capitalism is in the way of these rights. Instead of these rights, capitalism banishes them all and gives only one right to mankind -- property rights. This is a very poor bargain if you ask me. Between the two sets of rights, I prefer the first. Property is theft, it's just an arbitrary license given to some people to control the lives and land of others, backed by government guns. 'Property Rights', are just the new Orwellian terms for endless debt slavery, monopolies, parasitism, fraud, gross disparities in wealth, millions of people in jail, tens of millions out of work, and hundreds of millions facing the genocide of their entire race by their cheap labor mechano-ant hive people replacements. Enough is enough. I see what capitalism has in store for us. It is awful. It is horrifying. It is enough. Capitalism had its chance, and look what it has done. A crime that can never be forgiven or forgotten -- it has declared war on its own people.

It's time we started fighting back.

Why Nobody Cares About Minority Crime:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2009/oct/13/homicide-rates-country-murder-data

Here we have a helpful list of the murder rates around the world. At the top of the world are Columbia and El Salvador -- hispanics. After them is Cote d'Ivoir and South Africa -- blacks.

The list is even more impressive than that. The top 13 countries for murder are all hispanic or black. At number 14 you have Russia, that basket case of post-communist oppression that has never recovered since. Then the list proceeds as before, listing hispanic and black countries in Africa, Central America, or South America, on down to number #26, the Philippines. The Phillippines might be due to the insurgency waged by the muslim separatists on the island. Or it might just be that the muslims are thugs, or the Phillippines could just be an example of none-too-bright southeast asians being typically none-too-bright.

After this you must go down to #32 to meet the next non-hispanic, non-black country, North Korea. Well, we can chalk that up to communist terror and move on. You must then descend until #51 to get the next non-hispanic, non-black country. Burma. That dictatorial isolationist regime that's as poor and dumb as a door nail. Quickly after this in non-hispanic, non-black states is #53, Papua New Guinea. I can't say much about this, except the tribes there still practice cannibalism and raid each other with spears, so I guess it's not too big a surprise.

Next on our list of non-hispanic, non-black murder rates is #61, Mongolia. Everyone knows the mongols are bloodthirsty, so I guess that's good enough an explanation for me.

#65 is Kazakhstan. I suppose the combination of communism and Islam wasn't very salubrious for this country's murder rate.

#67 is East Timor. Poverty? Post-Traumatic-Stress-Syndrome from the attempted genocide of them by Indonesia? Typical southeast asian stupidity?

#75 is Lithuania. Communism's lasting effects? But from here on it trickles out, most of the countries are non-hispanic and non-black, mostly because we have already listed practically every hispanic and black country that exists.

The USA's murder rate stood at 5.9, just below Cuba and just above Chile. Compare this to Japan, who stands at the bottom, with a murder rate of .5. That's right, in Japan, for every 200,000 people, one is murdered per year.

A lot of lessons can be gleaned from this table.

Lesson #1: Hispanics are just as deadly as blacks. South and Central America are liberally interspersed with Africa in no apparent pattern, and Latinos even lead the pack, ahead of even South Africa.

Lesson #2: Out of the top 75 countries, only 9 are non-black, non-hispanic. IE: 12%. 88% of countries with high murder rates are black or hispanic. They are the overwhelming source of the problem that is crime on Earth.

Lesson #3: The highest murder rate is 61.1 per 100,000, in Columbia. Or in other words, .06% of the population is murdered every year. If your 'natural' lifespan is 70 years, your chance of being murdered somewhere in there is 4.28%. Perhaps a little frightening, but teenagers have probably taken far higher risks with their lives in all sorts of damn fool stunts. But even this is not accurate, because everyone knows crime tends to affect gang members, drug users, poor people, and all that ilk disproportionately. IE, if you keep your nose clean and stay out of trouble, the likelihood that you will be murdered is probably half this. So now we're talking 2.14%. People have far more to fear from smoking or heart attacks than murder, even in the most murderous country on Earth.

Lesson #4: In the age of tribal warfare, where the food supply was limited and hunter gatherers had to kill their enemies to feed themselves, around 33% of males died by murder. This translates to 16.5% of the general population. This is four times as high as the current highest murder rate on Earth, Columbia, at 4.28%. People evolved to be unruffled and undisturbed, to think it natural and quite safe, to live in a country with a murder rate 4 times as high as the current highest rate on Earth.

Lesson #5: So long as non-black, non-hispanics can stay segregated from blacks and hispanics living in their country, there will be no increase in risk to their lives. It is far easier to just move to an upper class area where poor blacks and hispanics can't follow, than fight a revolutionary war to stamp out crime.

Lesson #6: Muslims are less criminal than whites, or at the very least extremely peaceful, in their own lands. What we are seeing is not a racial problem, endemic to the population. It is either jihad, an active desire to wreak havoc on the infidel, or some sort of liberal explanation -- the pain of losing your roots, culture shock, poverty, not fitting in (racism?) -- that is causing muslims in Europe to resort to crime. I do not think it is jihad. Very few people are motivated by their religions to do anything in life, other than mouth hypocritical prayers and lying oaths they never heed again. Christians are just as likely to be sluts as atheists, and the same goes for their criminality. No one takes their religion seriously anymore, it's just window dressing. I don't see how Islam can survive the secularism of Europe, where everything is mocked and deconstructed, and pleasure is the only game in town. You will find that muslims in Europe probably never go to their mosques, listen to rock music, drink alcohol and fornicate outside of marriage. They will still call themselves muslim, but their religion controls their behavior in no way.

Jihadis tend to be highly educated, highly devoted idealists. There is very little overlap between this group, and common thugs who do street crime. They are doctors, like in the London plot. Or army majors, like at Ft. Hood. The threat of terrorism from these lone fanatics is so vanishingly small, that worrying about it is about as rational as worrying about an asteroid killing you. The threat of islamic terrorism is completely overblown and hyped, so as to achieve a political agenda. For the neo-cons, this is to invade the world. For white nationalists, it is to restrict immigration. It's all a con-game, like in 1984, where all the countries stayed in permanent war. They must keep you afraid so that you will stay controlled, so that the government agenda can keep grinding on and on without any opposition.

I think a third perspective must be taken on this, a Darwinian perspective. Muslims find themselves competing with non-muslims for access to money, status, and women. Naturally they become hostile and deadly to their racial competitors, and seek to assert power and dominance over the out-group. While they are completely at peace around 'people like themselves' back at home, they have been transformed into a feral sort of pack hunting predator in Europe, simply because there is now an outsider competing for their turf. Since Muslims cannot win a fair competition for money, status, or women -- (their IQ is too low, they are uglier than us), all they can do is resort to violence to try and even the odds. Hence, crime in Europe, especially rape and gang rape, the most basic assertion of darwinian dominance possible, explodes. There is probably very little difference between muslim youth crime, and gypsy youth crime. Same low IQ, same foreign race status, same pack behavior. So much for the threat of 'islam.' So much for people opposing someone's 'beliefs,' not their 'race.' This fig leaf which is used, which ostensibly claims that if all muslims would just convert to Christianity, it wouldn't matter how many immigrated to Europe, (and who believes anyone is really saying that? who believes opposition to muslim immigration is really that shallow?) is obviously just a cowardly opposition to immigration on the basis of racial competition. Until we identify the real problem with muslim immigration, we will be completely unable to effectively argue against it.

Here's why: People can sense dishonesty instinctively. When you start going on about the dangers of Islamic terrorism, everyone knows you're inherently dishonest, because there is no danger of Islamic terrorism. It is such a vanishingly small threat, that fighting to ban asbestos in buildings makes far more sense. If you argue about muslim crime, they will instantly point out that the most criminal muslims are the least religious, and that Muslim nations have some of the lowest crime rates on Earth, so Islam can hardly be the source of crime. Then people will say: "Face it, you're just racist, all of this crap about Islam is a lie."

And they will be right! The only real argument is: "To arms, to arms, our race is under attack! The foreigner has come for our land and our women! To arms, to arms! Up, countrymen, and let's make a slaughter of it!" This instinctual self-defense of the homeland, of the gene pool, is highly laudable, and the only basis for survival (that's why we have such instincts in the first place, they evolved, because everyone who lacked them has died out long ago.) But this irrational desire to live can even be multiplied in strength by the quite rational argument, that we should not allow the inferior to supplant the superior, and in the case of muslim immigration, we are allowing just that. The total level of human happiness and progress will decline, if we allow such a thing to happen. Even this is a racial argument though, because it insists on races having inherent, hereditable natures -- personality, behavior, and IQ -- and that the white race is superior to the brown race in these fields. If characteristics are mutable and not racially fixed, then whatever faults muslims have, they can be removed by education and other liberal programs, there is no reason to make a fuss about such minor, temporary problems, or discriminate against or deport people on such a flimsy basis.

Either you fight with full sincerity and honesty, without apologizing or feeling guilty for the foundation of your reasoning. IE, either you stand simply and forthrightly as a racist, or you are a coward and a liar, and no one should listen to you, because none of your arguments make any sense. Basically it's like this: IF racial differences and darwinism are true, then racism is the only possible effective state policy. IF racial differences and darwinism are not true, then liberalism is the only rational and effective state policy. Anyone squirming around inbetween these poles is a non-entity, irrational, and should be ignored.

Lesson #7: Fighting crime seems like a winner, the most obvious winner possible, for white nationalism. But it isn't. this is because there isn't enough crime to affect anyone even as things stand. There isn't even enough crime in Columbia to affect the average civilian anytime in his life. So what if we fight crime? Crime isn't what people are worried about in the first place. If crime ever does become a problem, there are plenty of ways to fight it, like Giuliani did, even with a black and hispanic population. The real issues people are struggling with in their daily lives are: drugs, alcohol, broken homes, smoking, obesity, health care, unemployment, poverty, loneliness, adultery, divorce, etc. Who cares about crime? More people are hurt every day by what they inject into their own bodies, than what any criminal is trying to stab or shoot your with. White Nationalists proposing radical solutions to issues like black crime come off as nuts. "She swallowed the spider to kill the fly." What people need to understand is that White Nationalism is not just an answer to black crime (a non-issue in most people's lives.) It is an answer to the woes that afflict them every day, that really are clear and present dangers in their lives:

It is the answer to poverty. It is the answer to unemployment. It is the answer to vice. It is the answer to broken homes. It is the answer to loneliness. It is the answer to adultery. Basically, if white nationalism does not introduce a program that takes on the true powers, the true dangers that threaten our people, we are irrelevant. The true dangers that threaten our people are A) the libertarian creed that people can hurt themselves in any way they please, and don't have to morally answer to anyone for what they do. B) That sex, and marriage, is a personal issue, that divorce is a personal issue, that single motherhood is a personal issue, and people morally don't have to answer to anyone for anything they do in the entire field of courtship, love, romance, sex, reproduction, and child care. ((Which is the majority of life!)) C) The libertarian creed that the economy is perfect 'just the way it is,' and that the accumulation of 70% of the wealth into 1% of the population is 'natural and just.' That soaring unemployment is just the 'weak getting what they deserve,' and that the fraud of banks, lawyers, advertisers, and lobbyists is 'perfectly legitimate economic activity.' D) The liberal creed that immigration and reproduction are 'human rights' that cannot be interfered with, but are a completely personal issue, that no one has to morally answer to anyone for their choices.

What you really find, when you look into these issues, is that the true enemy is unaccountability. We have reached a point where no one has to take responsibility for their actions, or their impact on the health of the group. The rich don't take any responsibility for how their business activity affects the poor. Women don't take any responsibility for how their romantic choices affect the men they betray, or the children they hurt. Immigrants don't take any responsibility for how they affect the culture and well-being of their hosts. Individuals don't take any responsibility for how their vices hurt their families and the people who rely on them. Parents don't take any responsibility for the likelihood of their children being truly productive members of society, or just social burdens that others will have to carry. Everyone wants to toss the hot potato to someone else. Someone, somewhere has to pay the butcher's bill. Every time, someone has to pay. It's like karma. If something negative is released into the world, no matter how many times you toss the potato, someone is going to get hurt. Divorcing the people hurt, from the people causing the pain, is a gross injustice. It also creates a complete moral vacuum where the activity is left totally unchecked. IE, if the people who cause pain are also the ones feeling the pain, there is a negative feedback loop and eventually their bad behavior stops. But if the people causing the pain, and the people feeling the pain, are different, there is no negative feedback loop, and the behavior is completely unconstrained.

In a properly run society, those who cause pain are held accountable, and forced to feel an equal degree of pain, or even more, until their behavior adapts to the hard reality that they will not get away with this crap, or they are simply erased. In a moral anarchy like our country faces today, there is no consequence for wrong-doing or hurting others. Everyone is free to do whatever they want, to whoever they want, and no one will even call them a bad name for it. White nationalism is about restoring order and discipline to this vagabond world. To create moral rules and laws, where before there was only anarchy. The consequences will be swift and extremely beneficial -- just like restoring order to New Orleans after Katrina, or LA after the riots. Anarchy never works, it always brings out the worst in people, and until it is put down by force, it runs wild like a firehose gushing water and snaking around the ground uncontrollably from the sheer force of its life energy.

For the last century or so, we have attempted to give people complete personal freedom, ie, anarchy, as the standard for their lives. It has not worked. White Nationalism is the voice of sanity, calling people back to the recognition of authority, of law, of order. As it turns out, 99% of all harm done to people right now, is not due to crime, but completely legal activity. The real crime of the century, is that everything is legal. That's where our energy must be directed, and that's where people must discover there is another way.

Phenotype, not Genotype:

I've made this clear thousands of times, but people are still apparently confused as to why exactly I am pro-white, and anti-jew.

I believe in absolute, objective, universal morality. I am not a relativist. I do not give special privileges to whites over any other group. If whites were the worst race on Earth, I'd hate whites the most, and I'd probably be lobbying all sorts of groups to resist the white menace, regardless of the fact that I am white. My personal situation has nothing to do with right and wrong, good and evil, superior and inferior. This simply isn't the case though. In fact, we find that of all groups, jews are the absolute worst, and whites are the absolute best. This is a very inconvenient truth. But it is the truth. I believe in Truth and follow wherever it leads. I don't believe in 'whiteness' and follow wherever 'whiteness' leads. Whites have earned my loyalty through their behavior, just as jews have earned my hostility through their behavior. Not because of any particular string of AGCT's on their DNA strip. Not because I might share some string of AGCT's with someone else somewhere. Who cares? I certainly don't. Existence is not moral, only behavior can be moral or immoral. A rock exists. Humans act.

Truth does not exist somewhere 'out there.' It isn't a resource you can mine from a mountainside, nor is it a star we can build a rocket ship and fly over to. It is a moment in time, when a synapse fires, actively, thinking something true. It's when a mind, somewhere, has grasped the truth and is currently creating it, ex nihilo, in that most masterfully complex of all forces in the universe, the mind.

Beauty isn't just sitting there, or doing its own thing. It exists only at a split second in time, when a synapse fires, looking at something, and realizes this is beautiful. When the mind has fully grasped just how awe inspiring X is, when there is a sort of snapping into place of appreciation for what they are reflecting upon, there, and no where else, is beauty. It is there only then, and no other time. For beauty to be resurrected, the synapses would have to fire again, or some other mind would have to come along and experience the same revelation. Between those times, it is gone again. There is no beauty in an uninhabited planet, no matter what the view.

Love isn't just floating around, it doesn't make clouds and rain, or shoot arrows at people. Love is a frozen moment in time, when your synapses fire, and you realize, this is a part of me. When a mind transcends its narrow self and identifies with the other, becoming a larger whole. "Love is the recognition of the other into the conceptualization of the self." It is a thought, an active process ongoing in the mind, it is a verb.

Good is a verb. It is due to intelligence, and is the product of thought. Emotions are also a part of thought, emotions are just conclusions, thought out conclusions, just like logic is. All good is contained in the intelligent mind thinking various good thoughts. When the brain stops, so too does all morality. There is nothing left in that husk, just as there is nothing of value in a dead universe, an unintelligent amoeba, or, much worse, someone who works actively to suppress all good thoughts in the world.

And this is why jews are the worst people on Earth. For over a century now, their boazian school of Anthropology, their politics, their liberalism, has been dedicated to suppressing the truth. They have stopped all progress in science, politics, and ethics, cold. They have banned eugenics, which could have made people infinitely happier, fitter, wiser, and more intelligent than they are today. They have caused dysgenics, by flooding the people who were already more evolved, with people who were already less evolved. They are actively destroying any chance for intelligence to inherit the earth, and are pushing with all their might for bestiality and barbarism to reign instead. It doesn't really matter why. It just matters that this is absolutely, unchallengeably, what they are doing.

Jews have done everything in their power to destroy Beauty. They replaced the beautiful architecture and art of the European, with the ugly and twisted corruption of modern art. They have replaced the soaring heights of Classical music, opera, and ballet, with rap, sitcoms, and grinding. They have even promoted race mixing, destroying the inherent beauty of the white race by polluting it with all sorts of inferior breeds that can only possibly make it worse. They have striven relentlessly to lower people's moral standards, so that previously sublime experiences like sex have become cheap and ugly, even disgusting and perverse. Jews, no one else, did this. Freud, the jewish pornographers, the whole hollywood media. They cannot escape culpability for these crimes.

Jews are at the forefront of destroying love. They use their tool, 'deconstructionism,' to deconstruct all relationships, all bonds, between mankind. They have destroyed, quite intentionally, even announcing this as their avowed goal, a person's love for his nation, his homeland, his extended family, his nuclear family, his ancestry, his faith, his traditions, his language, his culture, even his wife. Leaving him with nothing. Loving nothing, and unloved by anyone. The jews claim that by deconstructing all 'prejudices,' all 'silly hangups,' they have freed people to love only those they choose to love. And yet, once you have removed absolutely everything to cleave to, and are 'completely free' as an individual, you no longer CAN love anyone or anything. The entire point of love is to subsume your individuality into something more, something else, something better. A perfect individual is incapable of love. A lover can never be an individual, looking out only for himself, concerned only with his own well-being. By promoting selfishness, self-centeredness, and destroying all possible ties, making even marriage 'a silly tradition with no purpose,' so that people must live all their lives single, or jumping ice floe to ice floe with temporary fling after temporary fling -- jews have made a full out assault on love. Their media has done it, their universities have done it, even their laws have done it -- promoting homosexual marriage, or distributing condoms in school, or providing welfare benefits to unmarried, but not married mothers.

If anyone wants to pretend jews are not behind the media, the deconstructionism of the universities, the modern art museums, pornography, miscegenation, immigration, and boazian egalitarianism, be my guest. The facts are the facts, they cannot be denied, they're available for anyone who wants to look up the prominent names and ethnicity behind every single one of these movements. I don't care why they do it, I just hate and oppose them for doing it. There is no excuse for evil. What they are doing is evil. They are stomping out all the light in the world, and turning the future into a dark age. An age more miserable than anything that came before, regardless of all our material wealth. Because at least in the past you could marry and have children. You could be around a community that knew and accepted you. You could learn your history and teach it to your kids, without becoming a thought criminal. You could speak your native tongue and expect to be understood.

Jews are the most evil people on earth. Their mass murder of white Russians under Lenin and Stalin is just the tip of the iceberg. Far worse is their murder of white souls, the ones who were born with the capacity for and a yearning towards love, beauty, and truth, but have been hoodwinked, deceived, seduced into egoism, degeneracy, and lies. Jews not engaged in this behavior are of course exempt from my previous criticism. But they are such a vanishing minority (remember, 80% voted for Obama, and all the liberalism he represents), that it is proper to speak of jews as a group participating in these crimes. To say otherwise is just denying reality. It isn't a few rogue jews. Boaz and Freud and Marx are not a few rogue jews, they are the most admired and followed jews by all the other jews. Jews love these guys. They support them at all times, everywhere, in all fields. Jews were the most fervent proponents of communism, both in the USSR and the USA, they are still the most fervent proponents of socialism. They are the largest supporters of Freudian psychology, denouncing white alternatives like Jung. The intellectual heirs of Boaz in the field of anthropology are Jared Diamond, a jew, and Gould, a jew, both absolute liars who know full well everything they say is bullshit.

Blacks are just beasts, one can't expect your dog to win a nobel prize in physics, or compose a wonderful love story like Homer's Oddyssey. It's obvious blacks are just destroyers, they are too inept to do anything else. It's like putting an elephant in a china shop. Who thought to put the elephant into the china shop? Who encouraged immigration? Who ended segregation? Jews. Jews! The people who put the elephant in the china shop, against the strenuous objections of the owners of the china shop, the builders of the china, and all the onlookers who said it would not work, were jews. There is nothing to say about blacks, they are so hopelessly out of their depth, such hopeless pawns of their masters, that nothing they do or say matters. I don't listen to dogs barking, or blacks talking. Jews are different. Jews are the smartest people on earth. They are in full control of their faculties. They know full well the consequences of their actions. They know what they are doing. They know they are hunting down the light of the world and extinguishing it, lantern by lantern, until there is no truth, beauty, or love left. No one left who can appreciate it, no one left who can create it, no moral being left. Either people's faculties are simply insufficient to reach the level of morality, like the beastmen blacks, or their souls have been so crippled and tortured by the culture around them, that all higher things are lost forever -- like the yobs of the UK.

For these actions they knowingly perpetrate on the rest of the world, jews are practically Satan incarnate. Not because they have a string of AGCT's that repeat in one pattern instead of another. Not because their DNA reads "TTCGTCA". But because of their behavior. Their actions. What they've done to this poor, poor world.

Conversely, I don't give a damn about the genetic code of whites. If tomorrow our entire DNA string were scrambled and we were changed into something utterly different, without a trace left of our entire genome, but it didn't change our behavior, I wouldn't give a damn. DNA is just a tool. If our brains were all digitized, we were given new, metallic bodies, and we discarded DNA forever, what has been lost? Nothing, nothing important. We used one technology, DNA, to live as humans. Now we're using another technology, AI, to live as robots. Who cares? I don't. Whatever works. Whatever produces results. How obvious is this? What matters is whether our new digital brains are more capable of producing and appreciating truth, beauty, and love. That's it. If they are, then it's time to switch over. If they aren't, we should stay the same.

Whites are the greatest invention on earth. They were invented around 30,000 years ago, and have continued to evolve ever since. Nature produced, through random chance, the best combination so far of a moral being. A vessel with the intelligence to fathom good thoughts, and the benevolence to actually yearn for them. Blacks lack the first, jews lack the second. Whites have both. We are the best invention Nature has accidentally happened upon. In Nature's quest for power and survival, it handed us a beautiful, loving, truthful race, the crown jewel of morality and value. But we aren't perfect. We could still do better. There is no reason to stop here, or confuse the means with the end. The white genome is simply the means, a tool, a technology, towards our end -- Truth, Beauty, Love. If there is a better means, a better tool, than the white genome, we should use that instead. If this better means or tool is the asian genome, then so much the worse for us. We are simply obsolete, like the buggy whip, and should be discarded into the scrap heap of history. But this isn't the case, and thus our duty remains. To preserve the white race, so that we can preserve love, beauty, and truth, the fast diminishing light of this world.

Why am I so certain whites are the best? Because of our record. Cast your eyes back on our heritage. Is there anything so grand? So incredible? So spectacular? No. No matter how you measure it, not even close. Charles Murray's book, Human Accomplishment, is the final word on this issue. There is simply nothing more to say. In science and in the arts, white men are the source of at least 90% of all human accomplishment. 90% of truth and 90% of beauty, straight off the bat. Then we must recall that whites were the first people on earth to adopt monogamous marriage, that many cultures didn't even have a word for love, before we provided it to them, and that our treatment of women was the best on earth, and the final loop in the knot is done. Whites are the most loving people on earth. We're even more loving towards animals, and other races, the most altruistic, caring, giving people on earth. Due to the malevolence of others who take advantage of our naivety, this is a flaw. But among ourselves, it's just wonderful.

We are a race of titans. We so dwarf all the rest of mankind, that the white race is worth more than all of them combined. I can't even imagine how this point is debatable. Everyone on earth reads Shakespeare and gazes at Michelangelo's David. No one reads 'the tales of the aztec cannibal xeuztucucu' or whatever the hell amerindians came up with. No one goes to look at their skull racks of all the enemies they've killed. A few people read The Tale of Genji and Sun Tzu's Art of War. Neither compare in the least to Dostoevsky. Why can I say that? Because I've read all three. I've read the Persian Book of Kings, it's pathetic, long-winded, repetitive, and ignoble. It isn't worth a verse of the Iliad. It isn't worth a verse of the Aeneid! I've read the Bhagivad Gita, the Koran, they're nothing to our philosophers -- Plato, Aristotle, Nietzsche, Kant, Plotinus, Hume -- why can I say that? Because I've read all of them too. All of them. All the greats. And the greatest of the non-whites are the mediocre nobody's among whites. They just can't compete. It is hopeless. We are light years of evolution ahead of them. Or rather, we WERE light years ahead of them, until jews got a stranglehold on our culture, and made it the pathetic mess we see today. Today, the best art, the best philosophy, comes from Japan. But the best Japan has, still can't compete with the best the white race had. Nor can it compete with the best whites could have again.

We are the once and future king.

Not because our genome reads "ACGGTCT". But because of our record. I am proud to be white, not because "ACGGTCT" is just an amazingly proud sequence of nucleotides, but because Goethe was white, and so was Euclid, and so was Beethoven. I'm a part of them, and they're a part of me, biologically, historically, culturally. I love them, and so they are me. And that is why their accomplishments are my own, and I can take pride in 'other people's things.' I am not just me, but everyone and everything I love. I can take pride in anything I love, because it's mine, I've incorporated it into myself. Beethoven's music is not just Beethoven's, beauty is produced in the brain that captures it, in the electric lightning flash of thought, that says, "this is beautiful." Beethoven couldn't do that on his own. He needed me too. I was part of the glory of his music -- the brain that could appreciate it, is a tool just like the instruments that play the music. His music is my music, is our music, and the beauty produced is the beauty I produced, with my head, with my heart, due to who I am. It was my accomplishment too. Neitzsche's philosophy is not just his, it's mine too. Because I understood it, reinterpreted it, applied it to the world of today. I thought it just like he did, it is mine too. Words that go unread produce nothing, only the brain that perceives and understands them, can bring them to life. I brought them to life, that makes me not as good as him, but good nonetheless. Proud nonetheless, to have done my part in creating truth in this world.

I get loads of hostility from people, because I attach no value to the white genotype. You're right, I don't. I attach a lot of value to the white phenotype, and I realize the white genotype is a tool that helps achieve the white phenotype. A tool that could be improved or replaced, and should be, but for now is the best we have. That's all it can be, because existence is not good, only actions are good. Love is a verb. Truth is a verb. Beauty is a verb. White is an adjective. It's not even a noun. ::laughs:: There's no comparison between the two. One is a minor detail, a mere tool, the other is our reason for being. Confusing the two is myopic and degrading. Who would ever be loyal to something less intelligent than we are? A collection of non-sentient genes? Why don't we worship dirt while we're at it? Ridiculous. I reserve my worship for higher things, the transcendental portion of our brains, our highest heights -- where we get a glimpse of how angels must think, but can never quite stay in their realm.

If white nationalism means a blind loyalty to a string of fucking letters, then to hell with white nationalism. If it means preserving the white race so that we can inherit the stars, then not only I, but many millions of people could rally behind it. Then it might, just might, actually happen. You can't appeal to people on the basis of nucleotide strings. I can't believe I even have to explain this, I can't believe I'm even saying this to ostensible adults. White nationalism is a Vision. It is an ideal. Ideals are not material. A materialist, biological reductionist, construction of our cause, is as worthless and unappealing as the communists who came before. Or the relativists and hedonists to either side. If they can't see this, then they are blind.

Another Explanation for the Citizen's Dividend:

The main objection to the citizen's dividend is that people don't have to work to earn it. It's just free money. People immediately begin to imagine a bunch of ill-dressed 'scroungers,' 'looters,' 'moochers,' and every other horror they've gotten used to ascribing to welfare.

This is unfortunate, because there are so many differences between the citizen's dividend, and welfare. For one thing, people Do earn their citizen's dividend. How? By being a good citizen.

I ask a lot out of Vinlanders. Not all of it is fun or easy. For one thing, they have to marry by age 20, have two kids by age 25, and they can't divorce. Adultery would be a crime and even pre-marital sex would have severe pressure put against it. Compared to the easy going lives of today, where people avoid all personal responsibility when it comes to sex, or their genetic responsibility to their ancestors and descendants when it comes to reproduction, I'm asking a lot MORE from my citizens than America does today.

Gays can't even fulfill my requirements for citizenship, marriage and two children, so they'd have to leave the country, that's certainly a hard row for them to hoe. Bisexuals would have to restrict themselves to members of the other sex. All sorts of other degeneracy, like promiscuity, polygamy, prostitution, trans-sexuals, transvestites, and who knows what, would also be gone. Everyone would have to live a decent, normal lifestyle behind doors. That's certainly asking a lot from Americans today, who have lost all sight of simple, decent, human, moral values.

Certainly the primary duty of Vinlanders is to actually have and raise children. This could even be magnified. for instance, it might be the duty of low IQ Vinlanders, or Vinlanders with various genetic ailments like a history of mental illness, to not have any children, have only one child, or at least screen their children and abort if the tests come out poorly. Likewise, it could be the duty of the nobility, people with high IQ and good personalities and stellar records of character, to have more than just two children. To have four or five, and raise them all with the utmost care and affection. This is asking a lot from a people habituated to spending their time and money on themselves. Our elites are the most to blame in this field. It's true they don't divorce or cheat as much as their inferiors, but they selfishly hoard their superior genes to themselves, leaving nothing for the next generation, by having the fewest kids of all demographic segments. The amount of effort and sacrifice of their personal interests I'm asking from them, to have and raise at least two kids, if not more, is certainly more expensive than the Citizen's Dividend they receive in the mail.

Women who are required to actually raise their kids, rather than send them off to daycare and then boarding school for life, certainly won't think the Citizen's Dividend is adequate reimbursement. And yet, it is meant as a reimbursement. It's meant as a measure that we value the work of women, that we value in real terms, the effort it takes to raise kids and do chores. That we can't do the important stuff in life, only these heroic women can, but at the very least we can ease the burden and take the financial aspect of worry off their minds. We ask a lot from couples to stay together through thick and thin, like all the centuries of old, but at least we can remove poverty as a source of marital friction. With both citizens, that's 24,000 a year, free and clear, from the government, to spend how you will. Enough to support both parents and both children, even if they can't find anything else.

The Citizen's Dividend reimburses so many other things too. If you can't find a job because we allow free trade and your job is outsourced, or we invest in technology and you become redundant, we feel your pain. We can't retard our economy especially for you, but what we can do, is not abandon you to a life of penury. We can give you a Citizen's Dividend, and it's also an apology. We're sorry society has no place for your work. We're sorry we've made you redundant. But you're never worthless, no one thinks that, the whole country still embraces you as one of our own, and that is why we are happy to give you this Citizen's Dividend, every year, for your entire life, come what may. We will be revoking all the socialist programs of today, the endless tax credits, the welfare, the corporate subsidies, the medicare, the social security. We'll even be instituting a regressive, flat sales tax that hits the poor as hard as the rich. A Citizen's Dividend is your reimbursement for all of this. It's not that we don't want to help you, it's that socialism doesn't work and doesn't succeed in helping people. It is wasteful and breeds huge numbers of parasites who get between the money and the people -- bureaucrats, businesses, whoever. For every dollar of socialism that reaches the people, something like 5 dollars was collected in taxes. The citizen's dividend is the exact opposite. We take five dollars, and we return five dollars. It means we can help people five times as much as before, at the exact same price.

Why would people resent the 'free money' of the Citizen's Dividend when they are fine with the socialism of today? It is the same thing, only infinitely more efficient and helpful to those in need. And if you're the sort who doesn't want to give a crust of bread to anyone anywhere, then you should STILL support the citizen's dividend, because it requires less in taxes, is less punishing to the rich, and at least you get a lot of your money back, in the citizen's dividend that arrives at your door. Just consider it a strange method of giving yourself money, and let it lie. It's fine to be a stingy curmudgeon, but most people want to help others. The young, the elderly, the sick, the poor, the unfortunate, and the misfit. The citizen's dividend is the best compromise you'll ever reach. Charles Murray is a libertarian and it was the compromise he came to, the closest thing to libertarianism society will ever adopt. If he can stomach it, so can you.

In Vinland, I've repeatedly said felony offenses would all carry the death penalty. Criminals are largely genetic, and we want them out of our gene pool, and out of our hair, permanently. It would also be a much faster system, no 12 years of appeals on ridiculous and specious grounds like in America today. For the sacrifice citizens have to make, to stop being criminals and have some discipline in their lives, there is -- the Citizen's Dividend. Thank you for not being a criminal, and here's a simple reason why you don't have to do crime -- you're already taken care of. No one is the guy from Les Miserables, stealing bread to feed his starving sister's family (not even his own! It wasn't even his irresponsible breeding!). The citizen's dividend simultaneously says, "Thank you for not being a criminal, and you have no further excuse for being a criminal, so mind your manners or it's off to the gallows with you." The gain in security is more than worth the cost of 'buying' people off. The cost of crime, and the criminal justice system used to fight it, is astronomical. All of that cost will vanish in Vinland, but in return, you'll have to pay the taxes that fund the citizen's dividend. It is the only way our carrot and stick plan of "Death penalty if you go wrong," "A good life if you are a good citizen who plays by the rules," can work.

If you're ever walking alone on a street at night, grumbling about all those 'moochers' receiving their dividend in the mail (no more and no less than you receive in your mail!), pause for a moment and notice how incredibly safe you are. How incredibly safe your wife and children are. How different this country is from the America that came before. Perhaps it didn't give away 'free money', like we do, but is that really important, compared to the fact that it gave criminals 'free license' to rape, rob, and murder you? Consider it a trade well worth making, it really is a reasonable exchange.

There's more to being a good citizen of Vinland. So far you have to a) marry, not divorce, and not cheat. b) have children (or not have children, as the case may be.) c) give up all deviant sexual behavior. d) face competition from all around the world in a ruthless capitalist system of only rewarding winners with jobs and wages. e) Give up all socialist benefits you may have previously had or expected to receive. f) face the death penalty if you do a serious crime. G) Pay a flat sales tax.

Women have to stay at home and raise their kids to adulthood, working only in a manner consistent with the child's benefit. That's asking a lot from them, but, it's no more than was asked of them for the thousands of years of human history, and at least this time they won't be single mothers, and they'll have the citizen's dividend.

Men have to be prepared to fight. Vinland will probably be born in battle, and will only survive through battle. Endless haters will seek to blot us out, just like the monarchs who marched on the French Republic, the war of 1812 America had to fight just to assert its independence yet again to Britain, and the Nazis assaulted from every side. Independence is never easy. A male citizen of Vinland first has to fight for it, and his children have to fight to keep it. Perhaps nukes will make conventional war impossible and men won't have to fight in that sense. But there will be an ongoing war all the same -- people trying to cross our borders illegally, propaganda being showered on us from abroad about how evil we are, rebels trying to upset our constitutional order, and only the strength and determination of our male citizenry will be able to preserve peace and order in such trying circumstances. The fact that men stand ready, that they support the constitutional order with all their hearts, that they will kill and die to keep our laws and preserve our people, is absolutely necessary for the survival of our Republic. Paying the men whose hearts stand ready to defend the homeland, with a Citizen's Dividend that thanks them for doing so -- for being the loyal, brave, and true white warriors they are -- is the least we can do. Like I say, it may have nothing to do with the military. It may just be that they rebuke, angrily and with passion, subverters of our nation from without and from within, and will not stand for intellectual sewage polluting their country from their friends or family -- that in and of itself is fighting. Is standing ready. Is deploying for the homeland. A citizen's dividend for such heartfelt citizens, is only fair. They love their nation enough to preserve it, so why don't we love them enough to preserve them? It's give and take.

There's more. People currently enjoy the right to vote. In Vinland, they won't. Giving people the vote was a mistake. Most people are not qualified to make the best choices for their nation's history. Only a select few we can trust will rise to those ranks. Perhaps they'll vote among themselves, or perhaps some iron dictator will just give decrees to an obedient bureacracy, or perhaps it will be some kind of complicated aristocratic division of powers full of checks and balances. In any event, the average citizen will be far removed from the seat of power. Even though the vote is largely meaningless and most people have never once achieved anything by voting, it's still a sacrifice to basically let go of the wheel and have faith in others to do what is right. To lose all say in your own life. We recognize your sacrifice, and all we can give as a return, is a country that takes better care of you, than any country you could've voted in. Part of that is the citizen's dividend. Part of it is crime prevention. Part of it is demanding moral behavior from yourself and those around you. But it all adds up. You lose the vote, in return, you receive the kind of nation you always wished you could have voted for. That's the kind of recompense we need to give people, for their loss of direct power they once enjoyed.

On that note, the demand for moral behavior is another sacrifice. No more smoking, drinking, taking drugs, gambling for money, cheating, sleeping around, hiring prostitutes, whatever. The vices end here. Innocent fun is innocent fun. Vice is vice. There will no longer be a conflation between the two. The piercings, tatoos, hair dyes, and all the rest of the 'I'm a rebel, hear me roar,' crap is gone. We expect decent, well behaved, fully dressed men and women who are proud of themselves and take care of themselves. The scenes of British night life, where everyone is puking drunk, stumbling into hospitals emaciated from heroine use, or wearing next to nothing but still crying because the guy you wanted turned you down -- are over. This kind of activity not only kills each person individually, it kills the whole nation. It's a rot without borders. It impacts everything around you, and everyone ends up paying the price. The eventual price is the fall of your nation to invaders and the extinction of your people. First comes the private nihilism of vice ridden lives, then the public nihilism of failing to upkeep your infra-structure, raise your children correctly, follow the law, and eventually surrendering all your borders to outsiders. It's happened over and over, from Rome to the UK of today. We can't let it happen again.

Our people have to be better than everyone else. It is possible to live a life free of vice and degeneracy. It's hard. It requires discipline and it requires devotion. But it's possible. it's been done before, not only by exceptional individuals, but entire societies -- like Victorian England, or the Spartans. Whites are capable of a holy life, and it will be that much easier, when the law legislates it, your peers expect it, and you are born into it. When every single tv show or movie is told in such a way to support it, so that you aren't led astray. Our country will use its laws to do its part, we will create a culture and education that supports you in your efforts to go cold turkey from all vice. But we recognize it is a sacrifice on your part, the sacrifice of many worlds of experience, some of it apparently very seductive and pleasant, considering how many people follow that path. But it is not our path. It will not be tolerated here, among us. We expect more from our citizens than just the average guy. And in return, we provide a Citizen's Dividend. "Thank you for being above average. Thank you for refraining from vice and degeneracy, which is the death knell of all nations. Thank you for doing your part in upholding your souls, and the souls of your children and the nation's soul. As respect and gratitude for doing your part, here is the Citizen's Dividend, that leaves no good deed unrewarded. We are aware of all you are doing for your country, and the country wants to do what we can for you. So here is a small part of that, the Citizen's Dividend."

A citizen of Vinland is practically a hero, a super-elite, of America today. He or she has so much to do, and so much he or she can't do, and so much he or she had but will have to give up -- that the citizen's dividend has been paid for in full. Every single one of them has earned it. It isn't free money. It's money to those deserving few, who managed to become citizens of Vinland, and are already the greatest friends, lovers, neighbors, husbands, wives, and countrymen you could ever ask for. Who have earned it through a rigorous number of sacrifices and qualifications, such that their conduct more than pays for the pitiful minimum standard of living we provide. These are not the 'moochers,' 'looters,' 'hobos,' and 'welfare recipients' you pictured at the beginning of the article. They are citizens. Citizens of Vinland. They are just as qualified as you are, to BE a citizen of Vinland. They went through fire to be here, to live here, and they are good, decent people. People no one should be angry at helping. People no one should look down on or resent just for living. They aren't going to be a bunch of unwashed, drunk, low IQ madmen like the picture of welfare recipients today. They don't go around burning stuff and trashing cars for fun between checks. They are citizens. Citizens of Vinland. Your extended family. The people who love what you love, and love you. Who loved you without ever knowing you, just for who you are, and accepted and supported you from start to finish. Who better than to give a little something to? Who better to pay taxes to? Who better to reward with a small portion of your wealth? If you're the unfortunate one, it's you who will be taken care of. If they are, it's you who will take care of them. But you're all fellow citizens. A handpicked, self-chosen few, who walked through fire together. The divide of 'providers' and 'parasites' just doesn't fit here. Not between family and friends. Not between comrades. Don't you see?

They earned it. Just like you have. Everyone has, who has what it takes, to be a citizen of Vinland.

White Nationalism is Future Oriented, and Thus the Future is With White Nationalism:

Old people remember a lot of unhelpful things. They remember the KKK marching around in terrorist-like intimidation tactics, shrouded in masks, carrying out bombings on innocent black girls in churches. They remember the nazis gassing 6 million jews, even though it never happened. They remember the pain of WW II and the joy of victory over this 'most evil of all foes.' They remember segregation, that nasty practice where blacks have their own water fountains and park benches, and can't even pollute whites with their presence -- when we're the ones who enslaved them and brought them, by force, to live alongside us! They remember crushing black poverty, where blacks were uneducated and lived in mud huts, without water or electricity, in the very midst of white prosperity and technology of the 1950's. They probably remember white trash, who were busy chewing tobacco or getting in drunken fistfights, making snide comments about 'niggers,' without realizing they were more shameful than the blacks they were insulting.

There is a lot to cringe over, and regret, in the racism of the past. It was not scientifically informed. It was not upper class. It was not defensive. It was not effective. For instance, South African Apartheid wanted to keep blacks in the country, doing menial labor, but refused to let them vote or hold political office. This kind of dual class citizen is an obvious injustice. Everyone should be treated equally by the law. White Nationalism is different, we don't want to oppress or control or demean anyone -- we want to separate from them, form our own country, and not HAVE any blacks to oppress, control, or demean. We don't want to terrorize blacks with white sheets over our head, and occasionally throw bombs into black churches -- because we don't want any blacks in the first place! We don't want blacks living in mud huts, or to call blacks crude names -- because we don't ever want to interact with a black in our life.

The right to separate from others, to right to found a community of shared values and shared characteristics, where everyone freely condones the nation's laws and system, should not be such a moral scandal. The land we ask for is of little economic worth and sparsely inhabited, and in any event, we have paid for over and over already. In white inventions that help feed the world, in white charity that has given trillions to non-whites, in white peacekeeping, in white foreign investments, in white disease inoculations, in white law codes that have freed hundreds of millions of people from barbarism. We have done our part. A tiny corner of the world where whites can live in peace among themselves, is not so much to ask in return. Billions of non-whites alive today, have only whites to thank. The nobel prize winner who recently died, the white who invented new strains of corn for mexico and elsewhere, ON HIS OWN has earned whites the right to the Northwest United States.

Why do people object to white nationalism? It can't be because it hurts and oppresses non-whites. We have no non-whites to hurt or oppress. We have no minorities to genocide. We have nobody to segregate from or apartheid on. We can't verb anyone! ::laughs:: If people object to the initial cost of the sorting, well why don't they object to California then? More people have been displaced from California than would have to be displaced from the Northwest Republic. Millions of whites have had to pull up stakes and retreat from the now majority-minority, bankrupt state of California. Who spoke for them? Who sympathized with them? After World War II, tens of millions of Germans were ethnically cleansed from their historic homelands (they didn't cross the border, the border crossed them.) in eastern Europe, two million of them died in the wretched circumstances -- a genocide twice as bad as the one done to the jews or the Armenians. Who sympathizes with them? Who cares about them? I don't believe people are crying their eyes out over the imagined plight of forced deportations of the handful of non-whites in the Northwest United States. It must be something else, if it were just humanitarian pity, that humanitarian pity would be spread evenly across the world, and apply to everyone. Not just people displaced by white nationalism. In any event, there are hundreds of ways we could pay just compensation, or exchange the value of property white nationalists hold in America for the value non-whites hold in the Northwest, even steven. It would not be a trail of tears. It would be such a minor cost, that the car accidents that deprive America of 40,000 people every year, is a greater tragedy than the entire process of deportations, a one time cost we will never pay again.

Are they afraid of the threat we would pose as a military on the rest of the world? Let me assure you, white nationalists want nothing to do with non-whites ever again. We have no reason to conquer or meddle in the lives of others -- we are completely disgusted with the outside world and wish for nothing but to be left alone. The last thing we'd want, after finally being free of outside interference, is to go out abroad again and collect a new set of non-whites to yet again be living within our borders!

Are they afraid America would be weaker and less economically sound without us? But why? If all races are equal, they should be able to make do with whoever lives in the US. In fact, since racists are all losers and 'the worst kind of scum,' they should be happy to see us all leave. Aren't we the ones causing all the friction between the races? Aren't we the ones keeping non-whites down? Aren't we the ones who cause all the problems in America? Without us, America should prosper to unheard of new heights. It's as though they secretly agree with us that whites are the only useful people and they need every last one of them to serve as economic assets in this fast-tanking world. But in that case, it's obvious to any neutral observer who is the oppressor, and who is the oppressed. If the real objection to whites leaving the US, is we are necessary to continue being serfs and slaves to the multicult empire that is America, then surely any third neutral party can agree that's a pathetic and unjustifiable argument that no one should have to listen to.

Are they afraid that the white nationalist example would be a 'beacon on the hill?' Are they like the kings who invaded the French Republic, for fear that it would upset the rule of monarchy across the continent, if a single Republic were allowed to stand? But this is again a rather crude argument, to a neutral third party's point of view. If our only threat to the outside world, is that we would make such a convincing argument in our own favor, such a great example to be emulated, that soon the whole world would adopt our wisdom and seek to prosper and succeed like we have, then how are we harming anyone? We would instead be the cause of great good in the world, despite the current rulers losing their power, because by definition we were an example that inspired others to emulate us.

Or do they oppose us simply because we lack the numbers to be taken seriously? The argument could go, "White nationalists are a smaller minority than even mormons. Mormons aren't allowed the state of Utah, so why should you be given Montana?" From this standpoint, whites want all the territory of the United States, and can't be bothered to share with crackpot lunatic fringes as though we are equal to the mainstream. But this argument isn't very good either. In polls, 20% of Americans currently wish to secede from the USA. We are hardly a small minority. Not only that, but huge numbers of whites consistently answer poll questions where they say that blacks, for instance, are lower IQ than whites. Huge numbers of whites want a return to the nuclear family. Huge numbers of whites want lower taxes and less socialism. Huge numbers of whites want to stop immigration. Huge numbers of whites want english to be the official language of the USA. And so on. We aren't on the lunatic fringe, there is a deep current of white opinion, that agrees with us on every single issue, but is too afraid to speak out or demand justice.

Do people object to the plans white nationalists have for the country they would found? On this I agree. If your argument is, "Yes, in abstract, a white republic in the northwest is justifiable, but when I look at the horrible system white nationalists plan to erect in that territory, I object to it, simply because it is a terrible plan that would only lead to misery and ruin." As founders of a new nation, we should first work out a decent constitution that really would lead to a good life for those who live under it. I want a country that's not only 'decent,' but the hope of the universe, the best that's ever been. Since no two white nationalists can agree on what makes a good country, and many endorse the silliest things, an outsider can simply say "white nationalists are not serious and thus can't be taken seriously."

There is progress on this front. Many white nationalists are settling behind darwinian evolution, scientific racism, eugenics, atheism, the citizen's dividend, the nuclear family, a love of the Classics of music and literature, a platonic class of nobility who serve as 'custodians' of the law and the state, and so on. Many white nationalists are willing to let eminent and well intentioned non-whites, including jews, into their new country, and base their discrimination not on prejudice but post-judice. They are willing to treat individuals as individuals, and weigh them on their own merits, when considering whether they should be allowed to emigrate to our country or not. Without any recognized leader and without any '12-point plan,' white nationalists couldn't found a country, or form a constitution, even if we were handed the Northwest. In that case, the USA has a perfectly valid objection to handing us the land. This will change.

New blood will join the ranks of white nationalism, old blood will leave it or die of old age. Christianity is losing its hold on the world. Genetics is making new revelations that soon everyone will have to admit is true, like the heritability of intelligence and personality. Young people will have far worse love lives, than the old people who came before them, and will feel far more passionate for conservative morality and draconian laws to enforce it. Basically, the more reality plays out, the more it reveals, clearer and clearer, the obvious and correct solution to our problems. The more history that is made, the more we can learn from history. The more existence, the more Truth in the universe. Eventually even the most dim-witted among us, cannot help but see, with crystal clear sight, the correct course of action, the correct leader and the correct constitution, for a new nation. It might take a century, it might take centuries for all I know. But eventually every false belief will have been discredited, or tried and failed, and only the Truth will remain. Because no matter how often the truth is tested, no matter how often the truth is disputed, no matter how often the truth is put on trial, it always turns out to be the truth. That is the incredible advantage of Truth over all lies. Reality is on the side of Truth, it will never betray it, and therefore, Truth cannot help but win. It cannot help but win in science, and it cannot help but win in politics. It just needs more time.

Many whites object to white nationalism, because they think America is perfect exactly the way it is. This will also change. Old people, who still remember the glory days of America landing on the moon, winning WW II, winning the Cold War, or just walking in beautiful parks and eating apple pie, will soon die out. The new generations will not have any fond memories of America. They will not have any reason to be patriotic. They will have no loyalty to a state that has done nothing but abuse and denigrate them all their lives. You can bet the girl who was gang raped for two hours in Richmond, California, where 12 bystanders sat and watched but not a single one tried to help, or called the police, does not think very highly of America. You can bet the 20% of Americans who are unemployed, and told their jobs 'aren't coming back,' don't think highly of America. You can bet a lot of people won't think highly of America, once we are majority minority, nothing works, everything is falling apart, crime is everywhere, and your vote is powerless to stop it because it is always overshadowed by the massive numbers of blacks and hispanics voting the other way. This issue will take care of itself, in time. The amount of suffering that is necessary to teach whites, in their very bones, that America is a terrible country, not suitable for habitation, may be regrettable, but if it propels people to found a new nation then it is worth it. In the long run, perhaps we need to learn these lessons, and until we have, we just aren't philosophically equipped to form a decent country that has recognized, addressed, and overcome the systemic weaknesses that plague the USA.

There is even a class of people who feel the white race no longer deserves to live, because of how suicidally they have behaved for the last century. They have a point, but there are innocents alongside the guilty. Certainly, I have no interest in preserving Christians, liberals, nihilists, or other white groups who have caused the very mess we are in today, but there has always been a core of white resistance that has resisted the status quo, and deserves their freedom and their chance in life. We don't fight for the fools and the cowards, but the good people who, like us, have earned their right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. There are still millions of them, a seed that will one day inhabit space and bloom into the most beautiful of world-trees. They are extremely precious people who need to be preserved, because both genetically and culturally, they are the best life has to offer. They are the eye through which the universe beholds itself and knows itself divine. Without them, there is only death and ugliness in a limitless horizon. They have to be preserved. For their ability to enrich the future almost infinitely, they are infinitely valuable themselves.

White independence is useless if we carry the same systemic flaws, the same failed beliefs, that ruined America and Europe in the first place. Whites were once 100% homogeneous and free, but their bad philosophy has gotten us to where we are today. Simply resetting the clock at 100% homogeneous and free, changes nothing. The same flaws will develop into the exact same conditions in the new country, as was true of the old. Therefore a white republic must first be preceded by an effective new pro-white philosophy. A system of thought and values that promotes a good life and an effective nation. Until white nationalists formulate and accept this philosophy, until they routinize it and have a disciplined adherence to it -- as disciplined as the 14 words being adopted by every single spokesman for whites and mentioned over and over again until every last white on earth knows what we stand for and why -- we cannot form a new nation, we wouldn't succeed in building it, and we have no right to one anyway.

If we take care of our philosophy, reality will take care of the rest. We have a long ways to go. Simple truths like atheism and evolution, that all facts on earth bear out clearly and for all to see, aren't even accepted. Higher logical conclusions like utilitarianism, the absolute and universal goods (love, beauty, and truth), the importance of virtue, the right to a citizen's dividend, valuing people for who they are instead of what they can do, are all beyond the average white nationalist. They are like little children who don't know how to swim in the oceans of deep thought that validate our cause. Somehow, these people must be shepherded towards enlightenment, step by tottering step. It's the same as last post -- deserve victory. If we are not the sort of people who would form a fine nation, a splendid nation, then we don't deserve one. The appropriate philosophy on life is necessary to a good life, it is by definition impossible for this to be otherwise. (If some other view were the key to a good life, then THAT would be the appropriate philosophy!) We don't currently hold the appropriate philosophy on life. This is quite clear from the endless errors I see white nationalists make, on an endless variety of questions, and all seemingly haphazardly and without principle. No one even argues logically, starting with a premise of what they value, and leading to a conclusion about what needs to be done to champion it. Every view is isolated and seemingly picked from the nether at random, to support whatever biased effort they're currently making. This sort of 'philosophy' won't do. It won't do at all.

Deserve victory. Become a clear sighted person, that light can travel through, without refraction or distortion. Become a well of truth, that water can stream through without pollution or corruption. Become a citizen of the kingdom of heaven, before demanding citizenship for a kingdom on earth. Your citizenship in the first, is your only ticket, your only passport, to your citizenship in the second. It just won't happen any other way.