Some people are born miserable. Some people achieve misery. And some people have misery thrust upon them.
I have a lot of sympathy for the people born miserable, but my universal solution is that they not be born. If blacks cared about their offspring, they'd realize all they can ever give their children is the curse of existence -- not the gift of life. Then they'd voluntarily just stop having kids and let their accursed race die out. Their poverty, their crime, their disease, their illegitimacy, their drug abuse, their length of life, everything is at the bottom of every scale. It is so painful to live as a black person in the world, I think it's evil to give birth to one. I think it's evil to interbreed with a black person and give birth to HALF of a black child. What future can they possibly have? They will be the ugliest person in the group, and spend thousands trying to remotely improve their looks with hair straighteners and skin lightening cream. They will be abused and abandoned by their boyfriends. They will never understand the world around them, or enjoy any of its finer arts. They will limp through life on a string, probably in debt, going in and out of jail -- virtually every black male goes to jail at some point in their lives -- and almost all the women have an STD and are morbidly obese. This is the curse of existence. If blacks were the only living sentient beings (and let's not call them human, they are more unrelated to us than neanderthals genetically.), then I suppose from a heroic mindset I'd encourage them to live on so that someday they could evolve into something better. Since white people already exist, there is no need for that though. We are better and by dying off, blacks would leave us more natural resources for our own population growth. The best thing blacks could do for evolution is to go extinct and leave all their land and wealth to the more highly evolved species.
Instead, blacks are a perpetual albatross around the rest of the world's neck. Their crime bleeds out into the greater community. They interbreed with us and drag our children's genetics down. They take our money in social welfare, they vote for bad policies, they get our foreign aid to Africa. They coarsen the general culture by lowering standards of behavior and serving as a bad example to the whites around them. And their very existence requires everyone live a lie just to avoid offending their sensibilities. Living a lie, any lie, corrupts a soul and makes it easily bidden to slavery of any kind. Because we don't want to tell blacks the harsh truth that they are inhuman, that they are a universal curse, that they should go extinct, that they are inferior in every way to the rest of mankind -- we instead lie and cover it up. We teach them the exact reverse, even though everyone knows secretly how false it is. Everyone knows Africa is hell, Haiti is hell, Detroit is hell. Everyone knows not to interbreed with blacks, not to enter black areas of town, not to send their kids to black majority schools. We just can't say it. We are too polite, too kind to say it.
And yet it must be said. If we coddle these people, they will simply multiply their misery, until the whole world is covered with their ilk. When we relieved the famine in Ethiopia, we did not cure their misery (it is incurable, since it is in their nature and not an accident of circumstance), we just multiplied it three fold. Now there are 3 times as many Ethiopians, all just as miserable as when we originally intervened. It is better to not exist than to be a black, they are enduring the curse of existence, not the gift of life, and they must all secretly be cursing us for feeding them, curing their diseases, and forcing them to live. Life is a strange thing, no matter how bad it gets, no matter how miserable it gets, people want to live. Even if people are being tortured they try to live. Once you are born, it is too late, all rationality leaves the question. "To be, or not to be, that is the question." If people were rational, most of them would choose not to be. They'd see that there is more suffering than happiness in life, that the world is better off without them, than with them, and that life is a croc. But people aren't rational, there are instincts that trump all rational considerations, and the most basic one is people's survival instinct.
This is why people who are miserable and hate their lives don't commit suicide. They turn to alcohol, drugs, or some other mind-deadening agent. They turn to fantasies like religion to console them and avoid life's hard truths. Or they just endure, day after day, like that wonderful quote of Thoreau's:
"Most men lead lives of quiet desperation."
Can anyone reasonably believe that those fly-bitten, round-bellied, black skeleton children want to live? That they're better off alive than never having been born? We are all encouraged to save them, to relieve their suffering, but they never would have suffered at all, if their parents had done the responsible thing and not brought them into being. Even so, these children will not voluntarily extinguish their lives. Even though they can barely move and are food for worms, they will fight to go on living. This is grotesque. This is just masochism. Evolution has wired into our brains such a will to live, such a high pain tolerance, that billions of people around the world, must suffer all their lives instead of die a blissful death. Maybe someday we'll figure out the genes for the survival instinct and undo the harm they have done to the world, but meanwhile, the only way to fight this curse is to not have the children in the first place. To not bring into being the curse of existence on these poor innocent children.
Low IQ people are going to be miserable all their lives. They will get no respect, they will not understand anything, they will be poor and lacking in necessary goods like food, shelter, health, air conditioning or entertainment, their families will be broken homes, they'll probably be abused by a parent of lover, and they'll limp to the grave after 60 years of this rot without any power to change for the better, or the willpower to return themselves to the giant 0 in the sky that is death. In addition to all this suffering, they will enjoy no offsetting goods. They aren't intelligent enough to enjoy the beauty of art, music, or literature. They can't understand the truth, it's too complex for them. They will never love or be loved, the emotion requires too much self-discipline and future-time horizons to ever succeed. There is nothing they can live for. There is no solace they can take in higher goods to offset the pain, because they simply cannot reach them.
The same is true of people born with horrible diseases or handicaps, or the mentally insane, who cannot relate well to the rest of the world and thus inevitably become the world's enemy -- both harming society and being harmed by society every day they breathe.
They are born miserable. They should never have been born. The fault is on their parents, and the society that let them be born. The answer is to not let them be born. Wherever we have the power, we should be pushing for the merciful extinction of these types of people. The eugenic euthanasia of failed races and gene pools will be the greatest contributor to human happiness imaginable. Far better than new crops, new energy sources, or a cure to cancer, is simply having fitter children who can make their own good fortune and enjoy their lives with the power in their own bodies and minds. If nothing is wrong with them in the first place, they are far less likely to need help from others, or a miraculous technology to come rescue them. Starting at a higher base means less effort to excel, and less effort for the excellent, to try to uplift the others around them. Everyone wins. The unborn do not curse their fate or resent us for not being born. They don't exist. They feel nothing. We haven't harmed them in any way.
Then there are the people who had no reason to be miserable, but went out of their way to achieve it anyway. I hate these types, because not only do they squander their good fortune, but they tend to drag down everyone else around them too. You're a beautiful, bright girl with the whole world in front of you. But for some reason you get it in your head to be ambitious, or live on the wild side, or whatever. Because of your innate quality, boys will fall in love with you left and right, and yet due to your personality, they will only be betrayed and hurt every time they do so. In the end, the girl sacrifices all higher goods, all natural feelings, to her strange warped imagination or pleasures, and is left just as broken hearted as the people she hurt.
A recent study has shown that girls are less happy today than they've ever been.
http://equalwrites.blogspot.com/2009/09/maureen-dowd-on-happiness-discrepancies.html I have my theory for why, and it is because they are actively 'achieving misery.' Even though they have everything handed to them on a silver platter, they just had to have more. It was never good enough. Like usual, evolution is to blame. From an evolutionary point of view, it's worth feeling any amount of pain if it means increasing the quality of your children's genes. In that case, being a despised castoff mistress of some ultra-elite, is still preferable to being the loved and cherished wife of a normal guy. The only thing love and marriage has going for it, is if women's children die due to lack of resources because the husband isn't there. If women can provide for their own families, that consideration goes out the window. Now they can shoot for the moon, or just artificially inseminate themselves with high quality DNA. This does nothing for their happiness, but it scratches their evolutionary itch to sacrifice everything for the sake of finding a better man. The moment women were able to provide for themselves and their children, they started actively achieving misery as best they could.
They have made men miserable around the world, by never providing them a reliable wife or children, or divorcing them halfway through their children's lives and separating them from everyone they love. They have made themselves miserable, by having to overwork themselves, face constant disappointment and rejection from the alpha males they hunt, never have the children their emotions are equipped to yearn for, and throwing away the consolations of womanhood that used to prevail. Company. Security. Culture. No amount of material well being can solve this misery, because it is precisely due to affluence that it is brought about. Affluence allows us to make wrong decisions and get away with it. The core of misery in the developed world is always, always emotional. People know what happiness is like, they've probably felt it at various times in their life, but they are lost in a dark maze of nihilism, they cannot find their way to the promised land, the more they struggle for happiness, the tighter they are bound by misery's snares. No one has shown them the way.
People can say we look back on the past with rose colored glasses. But how does that account for the genuine fact that women have in all surveys been happier in the past than they are today? The fact is, if a law were passed requiring women, and men, settle down into monogamous marriage at age 20, and have two kids by age 25, and not divorce. If education was made to give people a sense of pride in their identity, and a goal they can strive for that is ennobling and virtuous. If drugs, alcohol, smoking, and all that ilk were banned because something much better was provided in its lieu -- love, beauty, and truth. And if material concerns no longer mattered because the citizen's dividend meant marriage and children was ALWAYS financially viable at the time evolution meant for us to marry and have kids, when our hormones our raging at us to do so -- when lust can be married to love and create that initial rush of feelings as the foundation of our eternal bonds instead of thrown away on men and women we no longer even remember or care for -- what an improvement in people's happiness! It isn't just a theory, it's a fact, based on the fact that women used to be happier, and that this was how women used to live.
When we have gone down the wrong path, the answer is not to wander around blindly, hoping to get lucky and strike upon the path again. The answer is to retrace our steps, to reverse ourselves, until we are exactly back to where we first fell off the way. We have gone the wrong way, by following our evolutionary urges, instead of our enlightened designs.
By acting like beasts, we fell into bestial relationships, bestial perversions, bestial selfishness and bestial sins. We must reject evolution's conclusions and forge our own path, one dedicated to our happiness as higher beings. We can evolve ourselves, through eugenics and genetic engineering -- we are the masters of our evolution from here on. We must never let evolution be the masters of us. We must never let survival instincts dictate who lives and who dies, we must never let mating instincts determine who gets laid and who doesn't, we must never let a sink or swim economy decide who can afford to live and who can't. These sorts of surrenders to 'nature' are a discredit to the human race. Humans control their environment, they determine their own fate, they are slaves to no one and nothing. Whatever instincts we currently have that work against our designs, must be quashed through peer pressure and indoctrination, or simply uprooted from our very genome through science. They cannot be allowed to continue to fester and pollute the human world with all the suffering they cause.
The most unfortunate people, are those who have done everything right, who had every power in them to be happy, but have had misery thrust upon them anyway. The people who were handsome, bright, energetic, well liked and affable towards all, simply cannot succeed in a world like ours. Certainly, a great many of them have lucked out and found happiness on this earth, I will not presume that no one is happy on earth anymore. But alongside them, are the millions of people who have been betrayed by fate to a misery wholly undeserved. Their parents divorced. Their job got outsourced. Their wife left them and took the kids. A random criminal killed someone they loved. A war that should never have been separated them from their wife, who then committed adultery, stole their money, and left them while they were away. These poor people, who did everything right in their lives, never had a chance. So long as evil rules at the head of our government, so long as evil goes unpunished in people's personal lives, so long as relativism, nihilism, and hedonism pollute every young child's mind instead of an ennobling philosophy that helps them be virtuous and compassionate, what chance do the innocent have? They educate themselves with the Great Books series and ignore TV. They ignore the lies of their teachers. They resist all the drugs offered to them. They even preserve their virginity until they are married. Nevertheless, they are as miserable as everyone else -- because the same can't be said of their wife. And through that one chink, that one weakness in their armor, they are brought down to the same level of misery as everyone else. Perhaps even a worse level of misery, because they know what great things they are missing. They know what happiness should be, and how very far from it they now are.
It is not right that our most virtuous and most talented people are suffering the worst. It is not right for a depraved society to drag down our finest specimens, the very purpose and meaning of life, these heroic individuals living godly lives, dragged down by suffering. Pure suffering. We cannot do it alone. We cannot be happy alone. It requires justice, it requires peace, it requires security, it requires virtue from our fellow man. Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom were simply college kids on a date, they did everything they could to be happy -- nevertheless they were abducted, raped, tortured, mutilated, and murdered. They died miserable, and the families who spent all that effort raising and caring for them, their souls died miserably on that day too. What was it all for? What's the use? If the world is determined to make you unhappy, if the world is determined to steal every last hope and every last good in your life, there's really nothing an individual can do.
For the sake of the happiness of those who have strayed, they must be raised correctly in the first place. Guard rails must be put on the Path to happiness, so that the bumbling fools do not wander off it, or fall off it to their doom. We must legislate morality, and require people act in their own best interest, because they are too stupid or instinctually/emotionally driven, to do the right thing themselves. Some libertarian could complain, that this is needless interference, and if people bring unhappiness upon themselves, that's their problem and we should look the other way. But it isn't just their problem. Once society is saturated with these fools, they drag everyone else down with them. They hurt the ones who stayed on the path as much as themselves. They hurt the families who tried so hard to support and raise them correctly, to be given a return of pierce nosed satanism or whatever. They hurt the nation that fought and died for them, so that they might live and carry on our soul, our traditions, our genes. It isn't just their problem. We have sacrificed for them, through a thousand generations, ancestors have sacrificed so much of their own time, effort, and energy, so that this one child may be born today. They did not sacrifice all of that, so that the kids could get piercings on their private parts and enjoy lesbian orgies until they overdose on cocaine. It wasn't for that. Children have the duty to take the gift of life, and pass it on, with value added, to the next generation. Parents have the duty to make this possible for their kids. Society has a duty to make this possible for its parents. And the individual has the duty to uphold society. Everything is interwoven. There is no individual, there can be no individual, because man is a herd animal. We reproduce sexually, which at least requires a unit of two. We simply are not built to 'sink or swim', either economically, emotionally, or morally. Ayn Rand's view of the universe is simply, factually wrong.
We will all be happy or sad together. We will all be safe or endangered together. We will all be rich or poor together. A body can't have lung cancer and ignore it by saying, 'well, what of it, that's just our lung. The rest of the body is still healthy.' If any part of the system is ill, we are all ill. If anything is wrong with anyone, there is something wrong with everyone. No man is an island, we are all attached to the main.
The cure to human happiness is A) don't have children that clearly cannot be happy. B) put guard rails on the journey of life so that people do not make obvious mistakes. C) allow our natural aristocracy of people who would choose without any requirements the good life, the holy life, to rule, so that virtue is defended by those who love it best. Utopia has been within reach ever since technology freed us from our past of drudgery. It is only a matter of understanding and will today. How long must we continue to suffer?
Monday, September 28, 2009
Thursday, September 24, 2009
What can we learn from North Korea?
This should be a rather short and simple post. Time and again, when people complain about how wretched various external agents are making their lives, they are countered with -- "These are just excuses. All of your problems actually stem from within, they are internal, and all you have to do is make an effort, and you would have a perfectly good life. All of your problems are due to your own laziness, and thus it is morally just that you are suffering from all of these perceived slights from the outside world. We don't have to do anything, it's all up to you to provide for yourself, regardless of how the system is set up."
This amazing argument is trotted out no matter how bad the environment is. You can point out statistics like 21% unemployment, and they'll still say it's your own fault for not having a job. You can point out statistics like 50% divorce rates, and they'll still say it's your own fault for your wife divorcing you. It never occurs to them that in the past, divorce was less than 1% of the population, illegitimacy less than 3% of children born, and so on. They are actually saying that over the last century, all people across the board became wicked, evil, lazy, morally depraved scum, and that is why each of them, individually, has come to such a bad end. If only they had made an effort, they too would've received a 1% divorce rate, a 3% illegitimacy rate, and so on. It is all due to a complete collapse in each individual's personal choices, he is at fault for everything bad that happens in his life. Just as his neighbor is at fault for everything bad that happens in his neighbor's life. And so on. It is merely a complete coincidence that people all became so morally depraved, evil, and lazy at the same time.
This theory is about as scientific as spontaneous generation. THINGS DON'T JUST HAPPEN. EVERYTHING HAPPENS FOR A REASON. If, all of a sudden, half the country is out of work, when before they were working. If, all of a sudden, half the country is divorced, when before they were married. If, all of a sudden, half the children are bastards, when before they were legitimate. It isn't because 'Everyone at the same time became lazy and refused to make an effort and brought it upon themselves.' That is a non-answer. For such an epidemic of laziness and non-effort to occur, supposing that WERE the problem, there would first have to be some sort of LAZINESS SPREADING AGENT that could so heavily infect the population from OUTSIDE. Since internally, people have never been this lazy in the last ten thousand years, and they'd always made the effort in the past, what is the cause of their sudden laziness now? How can it be inborn? If not inborn, where did it come from? Yet again we are now searching for EXTERNALS. Externals, not internals, largely determine the success and well being of each individual in a society.
And here is my scientific, absolute proof: North Korea and South Korea. The exact same people. The same language. The same genes. The same starting conditions. The same natural resources. Except in fifty years, South Korea was rich, free, and thriving. Meanwhile, North Korea was starving, dictatorial, isolated, oppressed, and tanking. If that isn't good enough for you, there is also East Berlin and West Berlin. The exact same starting conditions, the same people, the same language, and so on. But one was bustling, rich, and free. The other was poor, oppressed, and starving. We were actually donating the poor East Germans beef and oranges we felt so bad for them.
If everything is due to internals, if everyone is to blame, individually, for their own problems, how is it that these sweeping plagues of laziness stopped exactly at the borders of East Berlin and North Korea? Why were only these groups of people affected, while people exactly like them, just meters across the border, somehow individually were not lazy, did make an effort, and did succeed in life?
Do I really have to listen to this kind of crap or give it any kind of respect? Are people really still making this argument with the facts spread out in front of them? What matters isn't the individual, it's the State. If the State has good laws, the people within its borders thrive and succeed. If the State has bad laws, the people within their borders decline and fail. This is why we have book titles like "The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire." In the past, everyone took it for granted that the problems facing the Roman Empire were the systemic failures of the State. No one wrote "The Decline and Fall of Individuals living within the Roman Empire who Failed to Make an Effort." When Shirer wrote the "Rise and Fall of the Third Reich." He did not retitle it, with our new libertarian, individualist, objectivist, internal-only worldview, "The Rise and Fall of Individuals living within the Third Reich who Failed to Make an Effort and thus Lost the Battle of Stalingrad, which, if they just hadn't been Lazy, They Obviously Could have Achieved."
No one in their right minds has ever blamed the individual for the failures of a people or state. Perhaps it's reasonable to blame the individual -- if he's the dictator of your country -- SINCE HE'S MAKING THE LAWS. But no individual living under laws he hasn't written, is to blame for the effects of those laws on said individual. What we are seeing, is a wholesale effort by the victimizers, to blame the victims, for their own victimization.
You're an elite white liberal yuppie who drinks at starbucks every day, practicing at some law firm or brokerage house. You look down on the poor, the unemployed, the single, the divorced, the whatever, and you say: "Gee, I'd feel really bad if it were in fact my business, my voting habits, and my campaign donations that crafted the laws in which this type of society has been brought about. That would mean all their misery, all their blood and all their tears, is on my hands. I'd better not believe Communism was the cause of North Korea's problems, I'd better insist that it was because the North Korean people were lazy and did not make an effort. This way, I can continue drinking coffee and ignore the suffering of the masses underneath me."
I bet Kim Jong Il will agree with you. He isn't to blame, he did the best he could, he wrote all the right laws into his nation and zealously enforced them -- but his people did not make an effort. They were too lazy. That's the only reason Communism didn't succeed in North Korea. It isn't the lawmakers, or the law, or the culture, or the externals that hold North Korea back. Because Kim Jong Il is flawless, he is perfect, he can do no wrong. His laws are like the Koran's, straight from the mouth of God. No, it's because each individual North Korean, unlike their South Korean brothers and cousins right across the border, failed to make an effort.
This ludicrous libel, that anyone who suffers under a system, are themselves guilty of causing the suffering; that it's impossible to believe a system is unjust to anyone, or that anyone could suffer without having deserved it, is one of the greatest enablers of the status quo. It removes all guilt from the perpetrators. It removes all resentment from the victims, and replaces it with shame. Now people's anger is turned inwardly, against themselves, feeding on their own sores, driven into a frenzy of self hatred because no matter what they try, they just end up hurting themselves more. If that destructive force trapped in each heart of each suffering child without two parents, of each unemployed person, each soldier sent to far off Iraq, each victim of a woman's treacherous heart, each victim of crime, each guy who wasn't promoted because a lesbian handicapped black woman had to fill her affirmative action quota, was turned on the genuine perpetrators -- the people who voted for and crafted these laws, this culture, this system -- there would be a revolution and blood would flow in the streets. Instead we have the perfect system, the libertarian creed, that everything is just in our own heads. That we are imagining our persecution, inventing it out of thin air. That everything is actually perfect for everyone else, and we are the problem. Just some losers who can't get with the system, because of their own moral failings. This keeps everyone dormant, no matter how bad the world around them gets, no matter how bad their own lives get, they are shackled and tranquilized by the knowledge that they only have themselves to blame, that they just need to make an effort, and stop being lazy, and everything would come right. It is the perfect creed for slaves and slavers alike. But for free men, it is simply adding insult to injury. I may not have the power to stop your injuries, but I have the will, the moral strength, to utterly reject your insults. My problems are not my fault. They are your fault. I throw them in your teeth. I defy you. You cannot make me a slave inside my own soul.
Mind you, it is possible that people are insane, lazy, vicious, intemperate, or whatever, and that no system on earth could make them thrive. But we can never know whether that applies to our specific circumstances until we isolate the variables. Who isn't letting us carry out this experiment? You can guess these are the people most afraid of the answer that experiment would return. I'm perfectly willing to accept that all my problems are internal, caused by myself and nothing else. But before I admit that, I want to live in the environment of my choosing. Among the people I choose, among the culture I choose, among the beliefs I choose, among the laws I choose. I want to get rid of all the possible externals holding me back, and THEN SEE who is to blame. I won't accept any slurs until that day, just as I reject out of hand any slurs Kim Jong Il might throw at his North Korean people for 'not doing Communism right.'
Until every last individual is in the country of his choosing, reflecting the laws and culture he prefers, no one is to blame for their own problems. Romania understood who was to blame -- they dragged Cieucescu through the streets. And then their lives improved, the economy boomed, and the people were free again. Somehow, the 'malaise of lazy people who wouldn't make an effort' ended. It wasn't due to self-help books, therapy sessions, Jesus Christ, or Oprah. It was due to the overthrow of their government and the slaughter of their enemies. You can bet Romanians mocked anyone who blamed them for Communism's failure. When will whites mock and ignore anyone who blames them for liberalism's failure? Until we know where to place the blame, until we have the self-confidence to proclaim it is NOT OUR FAULT, we'll never have the courage to march on our enemies.
This amazing argument is trotted out no matter how bad the environment is. You can point out statistics like 21% unemployment, and they'll still say it's your own fault for not having a job. You can point out statistics like 50% divorce rates, and they'll still say it's your own fault for your wife divorcing you. It never occurs to them that in the past, divorce was less than 1% of the population, illegitimacy less than 3% of children born, and so on. They are actually saying that over the last century, all people across the board became wicked, evil, lazy, morally depraved scum, and that is why each of them, individually, has come to such a bad end. If only they had made an effort, they too would've received a 1% divorce rate, a 3% illegitimacy rate, and so on. It is all due to a complete collapse in each individual's personal choices, he is at fault for everything bad that happens in his life. Just as his neighbor is at fault for everything bad that happens in his neighbor's life. And so on. It is merely a complete coincidence that people all became so morally depraved, evil, and lazy at the same time.
This theory is about as scientific as spontaneous generation. THINGS DON'T JUST HAPPEN. EVERYTHING HAPPENS FOR A REASON. If, all of a sudden, half the country is out of work, when before they were working. If, all of a sudden, half the country is divorced, when before they were married. If, all of a sudden, half the children are bastards, when before they were legitimate. It isn't because 'Everyone at the same time became lazy and refused to make an effort and brought it upon themselves.' That is a non-answer. For such an epidemic of laziness and non-effort to occur, supposing that WERE the problem, there would first have to be some sort of LAZINESS SPREADING AGENT that could so heavily infect the population from OUTSIDE. Since internally, people have never been this lazy in the last ten thousand years, and they'd always made the effort in the past, what is the cause of their sudden laziness now? How can it be inborn? If not inborn, where did it come from? Yet again we are now searching for EXTERNALS. Externals, not internals, largely determine the success and well being of each individual in a society.
And here is my scientific, absolute proof: North Korea and South Korea. The exact same people. The same language. The same genes. The same starting conditions. The same natural resources. Except in fifty years, South Korea was rich, free, and thriving. Meanwhile, North Korea was starving, dictatorial, isolated, oppressed, and tanking. If that isn't good enough for you, there is also East Berlin and West Berlin. The exact same starting conditions, the same people, the same language, and so on. But one was bustling, rich, and free. The other was poor, oppressed, and starving. We were actually donating the poor East Germans beef and oranges we felt so bad for them.
If everything is due to internals, if everyone is to blame, individually, for their own problems, how is it that these sweeping plagues of laziness stopped exactly at the borders of East Berlin and North Korea? Why were only these groups of people affected, while people exactly like them, just meters across the border, somehow individually were not lazy, did make an effort, and did succeed in life?
Do I really have to listen to this kind of crap or give it any kind of respect? Are people really still making this argument with the facts spread out in front of them? What matters isn't the individual, it's the State. If the State has good laws, the people within its borders thrive and succeed. If the State has bad laws, the people within their borders decline and fail. This is why we have book titles like "The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire." In the past, everyone took it for granted that the problems facing the Roman Empire were the systemic failures of the State. No one wrote "The Decline and Fall of Individuals living within the Roman Empire who Failed to Make an Effort." When Shirer wrote the "Rise and Fall of the Third Reich." He did not retitle it, with our new libertarian, individualist, objectivist, internal-only worldview, "The Rise and Fall of Individuals living within the Third Reich who Failed to Make an Effort and thus Lost the Battle of Stalingrad, which, if they just hadn't been Lazy, They Obviously Could have Achieved."
No one in their right minds has ever blamed the individual for the failures of a people or state. Perhaps it's reasonable to blame the individual -- if he's the dictator of your country -- SINCE HE'S MAKING THE LAWS. But no individual living under laws he hasn't written, is to blame for the effects of those laws on said individual. What we are seeing, is a wholesale effort by the victimizers, to blame the victims, for their own victimization.
You're an elite white liberal yuppie who drinks at starbucks every day, practicing at some law firm or brokerage house. You look down on the poor, the unemployed, the single, the divorced, the whatever, and you say: "Gee, I'd feel really bad if it were in fact my business, my voting habits, and my campaign donations that crafted the laws in which this type of society has been brought about. That would mean all their misery, all their blood and all their tears, is on my hands. I'd better not believe Communism was the cause of North Korea's problems, I'd better insist that it was because the North Korean people were lazy and did not make an effort. This way, I can continue drinking coffee and ignore the suffering of the masses underneath me."
I bet Kim Jong Il will agree with you. He isn't to blame, he did the best he could, he wrote all the right laws into his nation and zealously enforced them -- but his people did not make an effort. They were too lazy. That's the only reason Communism didn't succeed in North Korea. It isn't the lawmakers, or the law, or the culture, or the externals that hold North Korea back. Because Kim Jong Il is flawless, he is perfect, he can do no wrong. His laws are like the Koran's, straight from the mouth of God. No, it's because each individual North Korean, unlike their South Korean brothers and cousins right across the border, failed to make an effort.
This ludicrous libel, that anyone who suffers under a system, are themselves guilty of causing the suffering; that it's impossible to believe a system is unjust to anyone, or that anyone could suffer without having deserved it, is one of the greatest enablers of the status quo. It removes all guilt from the perpetrators. It removes all resentment from the victims, and replaces it with shame. Now people's anger is turned inwardly, against themselves, feeding on their own sores, driven into a frenzy of self hatred because no matter what they try, they just end up hurting themselves more. If that destructive force trapped in each heart of each suffering child without two parents, of each unemployed person, each soldier sent to far off Iraq, each victim of a woman's treacherous heart, each victim of crime, each guy who wasn't promoted because a lesbian handicapped black woman had to fill her affirmative action quota, was turned on the genuine perpetrators -- the people who voted for and crafted these laws, this culture, this system -- there would be a revolution and blood would flow in the streets. Instead we have the perfect system, the libertarian creed, that everything is just in our own heads. That we are imagining our persecution, inventing it out of thin air. That everything is actually perfect for everyone else, and we are the problem. Just some losers who can't get with the system, because of their own moral failings. This keeps everyone dormant, no matter how bad the world around them gets, no matter how bad their own lives get, they are shackled and tranquilized by the knowledge that they only have themselves to blame, that they just need to make an effort, and stop being lazy, and everything would come right. It is the perfect creed for slaves and slavers alike. But for free men, it is simply adding insult to injury. I may not have the power to stop your injuries, but I have the will, the moral strength, to utterly reject your insults. My problems are not my fault. They are your fault. I throw them in your teeth. I defy you. You cannot make me a slave inside my own soul.
Mind you, it is possible that people are insane, lazy, vicious, intemperate, or whatever, and that no system on earth could make them thrive. But we can never know whether that applies to our specific circumstances until we isolate the variables. Who isn't letting us carry out this experiment? You can guess these are the people most afraid of the answer that experiment would return. I'm perfectly willing to accept that all my problems are internal, caused by myself and nothing else. But before I admit that, I want to live in the environment of my choosing. Among the people I choose, among the culture I choose, among the beliefs I choose, among the laws I choose. I want to get rid of all the possible externals holding me back, and THEN SEE who is to blame. I won't accept any slurs until that day, just as I reject out of hand any slurs Kim Jong Il might throw at his North Korean people for 'not doing Communism right.'
Until every last individual is in the country of his choosing, reflecting the laws and culture he prefers, no one is to blame for their own problems. Romania understood who was to blame -- they dragged Cieucescu through the streets. And then their lives improved, the economy boomed, and the people were free again. Somehow, the 'malaise of lazy people who wouldn't make an effort' ended. It wasn't due to self-help books, therapy sessions, Jesus Christ, or Oprah. It was due to the overthrow of their government and the slaughter of their enemies. You can bet Romanians mocked anyone who blamed them for Communism's failure. When will whites mock and ignore anyone who blames them for liberalism's failure? Until we know where to place the blame, until we have the self-confidence to proclaim it is NOT OUR FAULT, we'll never have the courage to march on our enemies.
Wednesday, September 23, 2009
Modern Employment
We have around 21% unemployment in America today. http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data
This doesn't even take into account students, children, retirees, housewives, prisoners, and so on. Perhaps if we added it all up, we'd have over 50% of the population not actually employed. Since employment and the wages and healthcare benefits derived thereof are the foundation of our society, what does it mean when the majority of people no longer even fit into this foundation?
It means that the majority of people in our society are made into marginal, disrespected pariahs, who feel intensely guilty, ashamed, or resentful because they cannot fit into a society that increasingly has no interest in or accomodation for their existence. (and, we can imagine, just wishes they would go die in a hole somewhere and stop bothering us.)
It isn't just America facing this problem, the whole world is in a crisis, or will soon be in a crisis, of redundant population. I believe the world is overpopulated, but really that's not the issue. It is still possible to feed, clothe, and provide shelter for everyone alive on earth, even if that is not environmentally sustainable forever. The real issue is population redundancy. It's when people exist, and there are still resources to provide for them, but there is no place for them in society. They can't enter the workforce. No one loves them. No one respects them. They have no role to play and no connection to the outside world. How high is the population redundancy rate? Terrifying.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/xx.html
As you can see, 40.5% of the labor force is occupied in agriculture. And yet, in a modern technological society, say the USA, only .6% of the population is engaged in farming, foresting, and fishing combined. .6%! The USA was built out of farmers and is some of the richest farmland on earth. Dozens of states are best known for their massive farmlands, from Iowa to Montana, from Texas to North Carolina, even California has a giant agricultural industry. And yet, for all that, it only occupies .6% of the labor force. We can imagine then that this .6% number is not because the USA neglects farming, but because it has no use in employing any additional numbers. Machines can produce more crops per acre, cheaper, than any additional manpower. Let's say the people in America employed in farming alone is .5% and ignore our lumberjacks and fishermen. This is a useful number, because, lo and behold, this means 40% of the world's population is in fact redundant. They continue to till their fields with their hoes, and shovels, and clear rocks from the ground, pound in posts with mallets, feed their pigs and chickens by hand, milk their cows by hand, and so on. They think they are productive. People still think they are 'good' people, the salt of the earth, and they can still probably find wives and have children. But if modern technology ever caught up to them, they would suddenly realize it was much more efficient for 40% of the workforce to be lined up and mowed down by a machine gun, and the remaining .5% to consolidate all the farmland into giant machine-tended fields.
Lining them all up and gunning them down with a machine gun is perhaps the more merciful tactic. Suppose instead we simply bankrupt them through capitalist competition and then buy out their land to set up our commercial machine run farms on. These people will then be wandering around homeless, perhaps taken in by relatives, or flooding already overpopulated cities in search of work where there is none to be had. They will likely be single, spat upon, despised, mocked, and abused. The women can always turn to prostitution or somesuch, where they will gradually sicken and die of AIDS, but is that really better than the machine-gun line either?
The truth is, a billion+ people are living in a time warp. They are farming, but they are losing money every day they farm. They are working, but their work is worse than useless. They are simply taking up valuable land that could be exploited much better if they would just get off it and hand it over to the machines and overseers that currently rule the USA's agribusiness. These people have no economic worth. It looks like they're employed, but their employment is no different than say, being employed to move a sheet of glass back and forth across a road. Or to dig a hole and then fill it back in with dirt, over and over. If they currently receive respect and love from their community, it is only because their community is as equally backwards as they are, living in the same time warp, and unaware, like Brazilian tribesmen in the rainforest, at just how comical and futile all their activity is to the outside world.
A billion people who will sooner or later through globalization be economically displaced is bad enough. (Even worse would be if they were never displaced, because then they would go on their dirty manual stone age lives forever, until the sun blew up, scratching a meager existence out of the earth when everyone else has moved on to higher productivity and thus great riches and comforts.) But who is to say it will stop there? I don't think farming is the only sector modern machinery has made redundant, it's just the most obvious.
Manufacturing can largely be done by machines now. The involvement of humans is declining per product made. The same is true of resource extraction. Mining in China may still be a matter of men with shovels chiseling through rocks, but in the modern world it's usually just a guy on the surface staring at his computer terminal. Transportation is another job that is being, or could be, completely automated. Mailmen could be replaced by email. Truckers could be replaced by automatic trains (why not? Japan has them already.) Or if that isn't good enough, DARPA has already succeeded in making cars that drive themselves. If the cars can't navigate human traffic conditions yet, we could just build a lane for them alone, so that computer driven trucks would always be seen going endlessly back and forth like red blood cells throughout the nation, never sleeping, day or night, and thus far more efficient than any human could attempt.
Shopping markets don't actually need clerks, you can simply check yourself out at the computer. The same is true of gas stations, where you simply fill your tank up, swipe your credit card through, and drive off. There may need to be one or two humans overlooking the whole enterprise, but again, machines have replaced most of the labor force.
Anything involving muscle power is gone. The military is also simply ornamental these days. The power of nuclear missles is sufficient to destroy any army of any number of humans, or the country they come from, such that humans can no longer really serve a purpose on the battlefield. All current wars fought by human beings are not wars of self defense, where nuclear weapons would be sufficient, they are wars of choice, fought out of pure luxury. If most of the military were fired like they should be, it would become even more apparent how utterly useless men, in particular, were for any job anymore.
I'm afraid most employment these days is not real. It is entirely illusionary, just like the subsistence farmers who spend all day every day collecting chicken eggs by hand, hoeing their fields by hand, planting seeds by hand, and so on, living hand to mouth and a drought away from ruin. These people aren't really employed, they're simply ossified fossils trapped in amber. You could call them zoos of neolithic mankind. Everyone else has moved on, they serve no real purpose to the rest of us, and are just a eminent domain away from being eradicated. (like the brazilian rainforest tribes). The population of the Earth that has been or could be replaced by machine labor is not just one billion, it's billions. Every year this number will grow, not shrink, as computers become ever faster and more able.
But what of re-education and job training? Isn't the capitalist system about firing people so that they can develop new skills and create new jobs and make us all wealthier?
Well yes, that's the concept. But it completely ignores IQ. For one thing, most subsistence farmers are dead as door nails dumb. They live in India or Africa, with IQ's of 70-80. They could never be trained to operate machinery, start their own business, or do anything else of use that the 'vibrant capitalist free market' could wish of them. Maybe there is a high demand for time travel tourism, and in a perfect world, all the people unemployed by machines could just turn into time travel tour guides. But the fact is, people who are unemployed are not capable of just switching to some other job specialty. They never got a decent education in the first place, there's no infrastructure available to give them a decent education now, and even if there were, they'd be too dumb to take advantage of it. So if they can't be turned into 20th dimensional quantum pill inventors, like the capitalist model says they should be doing, what are we going to do with our redundant population?
The modern answer has been atrocious. Through heavy taxation, governments have managed to hire practically 1/2 the workforce into government jobs. What do these people do? Nothing, really. They push paper around. They stamp forms. They issue licenses. They inspect homes. They manage other government workers. They basically pick up glass and move it back and forth across roads. This is incredibly expensive, but it's also demoralizing. When people are working, they want to see something good come out of their work. A happy customer. A beautiful finished good. A hearty field of grain. A bridge or a road people can use. Work like that is fulfilling, it's good for the soul, it makes people feel like they're making a difference. When people simply stare into computer consoles or fill in files all day, how can they deceive themselves that they're doing anything but collecting welfare? And how can the outside world view them as anything but obnoxious, interfering parasites constantly taxing and regulating the genuine working world? Bossing around their betters because they were too inferior to actually achieve anything?
The other answer has been equally vile. There are people who have found niches in the modern economy, not by out-achieving their machine-equivalents, but by using their intelligence and understanding of the human psyche, to prey off the rest of us. This is called 'customer service,' 'sales,' 'marketing,' 'advertising,' 'lawyers,' 'brokers,' another 25% of the entire labor force. Not to mention anyone who owns a retail store is just one giant walking advertisement. All manufactured goods could be kept in concrete warehouses without any windows or any people looking after them. If someone wanted a product, they could order it online, and then it could be shipped directly from the warehouse to the buyer in a few days. The advantage of the retail outlet isn't that 'all-important 3 days faster,' because that's completely offset by the extra expense needed to have small stores with people dotted all around the country offering these goods. The real advantage is the prospect of placing the products in such an appealing fashion, that people will spontaneously choose to buy something they didn't need and hadn't even thought of getting. With that in mind, we can place all retail sales as just another segment of the advertising economy.
Why does advertising exist? In the age of the internet, if people want something -- a job, a house, a car, a book, a washing machine -- they can simply type it into a search engine and find exactly the product they need. This is the exact opposite of advertising, which seeks to intrude on people's time or senses and convince them to spontaneously buy something they didn't actually want before. The entire modern economy is about getting people to buy stuff they didn't actually want, through subliminal messages and careful psychological manipulations, like placing attractive women next to the products, or showing really cool people using the product that you could be like, and so on. People, by watching these ads, are generally trying to buy status, women, friends, power, or some other ineffable product. Instead all they ever get is plastic junk, which breaks or is eventually stowed away in the garage/attic, never to be seen again. They never learn though. How could they? The people being conned have a lower IQ than the conmen. And no matter how hard they try to learn not to buy stuff, they are competing with people who spend their entire lives learning how to MAKE them buy stuff. The sales departments, the marketing departments, spent 8 years in college learning how to trick you into buying their product, then spent the next 40 years of their working lives continuously improving on and innovating from that knowledge. What's a low IQ person who, after all, has to spend at least some time thinking about HIS job to do in defense against this all out blitz? It's the same with lawyers and brokers, insurance agents and all the rest -- people who spend their lives advertising to people about how much they're needed, how great it would be to buy their services, when in fact all of these people should be avoided like the plague. They are the vampire elite, they get rich off of the lifeblood of others -- their quarrels, their fears, their greed, any vice you have, there is a group of people eager to coax you into living by it to their gain.
In a properly run society, we would simply ban vampirism. People should not be allowed to profit off of, or encourage, the mistakes and vices of others. If anything, people should be employed to minimize other people's mistakes and vices, not inflate them all while skimming a salary from it off the top. In that case, all of these jobs would also become redundant.
What jobs aren't redundant, from an objective point of view?
The military should be reduced to near nothing.
The bureaucracy should be reduced to near nothing.
Transportation, Farming, and Resource Extraction should be automated.
Advertising, Marketing and Sales should be replaced by internet search engines.
Retail stores should be replaced by warehouses and online stores.
Vampiric practices like usury, divorce courts, health insurance, should all be banned.
Clerks should just be computer checkout stations.
Manufacturing can be nearly automated.
Okay, so who is actually employed? Who isn't redundant? Maybe now you can grasp why the majority of America's people are already redundant, because we are furthest along the internal logic of a technological society? Can you also see why none of these jobs are coming back? That the unemployed, are going to stay unemployed, and only grow, as time goes by? Can you also see that it's no better to employ redundant populations in parasitic makework than to not employ them at all?
What we're left with is the tiny sector of the economy that's still valuable. Construction, Repairmen, Doctors + Nurses, Teachers, Police, Firemen, Scientists, Engineers, Artists, Entertainers, Architects, Managers.
Add to these groups, the tiny fraction necessary for all the other fields, like for instance the .5% of Americans who are still farmers and are essential, the manufacturers who can't be automated, and so on.
Most of the positions our economy still needs to fill require a high IQ. Therefore we can ignore them as a possibility in employing our redundant populations. This narrows it down to nurses who tend to our elderly, teachers and day care centers that provide for our kids, construction workers, repairmen, and firemen who tend to our buildings, and police who protect us from each other. Let's look at this a little more closely to see just how distorted the modern economy is:
Couldn't we remove and nurses for the elderly by just having children take care of their own parents in their own homes, or just letting them die if they're so far gone no one can treat them? Furthermore, couldn't we remove teachers and day care centers, by having parents raise their own kids instead of out source it to other women? Out of the truly productive jobs, most of them were dealt with in the past by stay-at-home moms. Housewives. The remainder -- construction workers, repairmen, police and firemen, are all traditional masculine roles. They could be filled by those good ol' 9-5 jobs where men left their wives with a kiss and came back to a steaming hot dinner. As for the high IQ jobs of management, art, science, engineering, etc, that has always been a place almost solely reserved for men. Restricting women from employment does not actually hurt the economy -- because the true economic function of women has never BEEN in the economy.
The most productive task imaginable in humanity is bearing children. The second most productive task imaginable, is rearing children. Women already do the two most important jobs in life, and no one else can do them. They are built to do them, and they are excellent at the task, far surpassing men. That IS their contribution to the economy. The economy, in fact, exists solely to keep them, and the children, provided for while the women go about doing this all-important work. Men are not the center of life, we are at the bare fringe, the edge. We are the icing on the cake. They can do without us, and it looks like they intend to do without us for the most part, from here on. If we wish to continue existing on this planet as a non-redundant, non-despised, non-exiled population, it will take a reevaluation of values. Are people valuable because they can get a job? Because they can make money? Because they fulfill some vital task in the economy? Or is it because of something else?
My viewpoint is 'something else.' People are valuable insofar as they experience, and create the experience of, love, beauty, and truth. A person who believes the Truth is valuable, whether he ever picks up a shovel in his life. A person who gazes adoringly at Nature, or Women, or a math equation, is valuable, whether he ever harvests a crop or not. A person who loves his wife, his children, his friends, or even his dog, is valuable, whether he hammers a nail or not.
Even more valuable than the above, though predicated upon the value of the above, (as there would be no use in creating love, beauty, or truth, if no one enjoyed possessing it.) are the scientists, philosophers, artists, architects, etc, who create new wealth and value to the universe, the ex nihilo cornucopias that grace us with masterpieces in every field. The economy may have no use for them, the economy may never reward them (just look at poor Nietzsche, Tchaikovsky, or Socrates), but Nature is the grander for their existence, and the people who drunk of their fruit.
Through this prism, there is no redundant population. People are valuable not insofar as their material productivity (which is largely zero for the majority of mankind), but instead for their emotional productivity. The most emotionally productive people on earth are white people. They have all the genius artists and scientists. They are the most eager to embrace the Truth, wherever it leads them, and upset old traditional Errors and Customs that get in the way. They are the most loving people on earth -- towards each other, towards outsiders, towards their wife and children, even towards animals. Whites are the most beautiful people on earth. Therefore, through this new criterion of value, not economic, it becomes clear that
A) the redundant population is those people who cannot enjoy love, beauty, or truth. Or cause more harm to it than they add benefit to it. (So, basically, blacks and jews? :). In truth this cuts through all races, though disproportionately.)
B) Though many non-white people are valuable, in a world of finite resources, the greatest allocation of value would be to promote the welfare of the most valuable people. In this case, we should at all costs preserve our most precious sample of mankind, the white race. And secondarily, where there is a necessary conflict of interests, we should support the whites, not their enemies, regardless of how good they might be.
Armed with this new tool of insight, what should modern employment look like? Let's keep the necessary jobs, by all means. But let's cut all the other jobs. The redundant jobs. Instead of people working for prestige and wages, even though all their work is parasitic, or makework, and could easily be replaced by machines or simply not done anymore, let's give them prestige and wages for free, and let them go home already.
Free wages = The Citizen's Dividend. Our recognition as a people that many of us cannot be measured by our economic productivity, and that the value of our existence is not a simple matter of what job we can hold. That so long as we have the money, we will show that we do value people's existence, whether they work or not, and we think it's worth our effort and resources, that they go on living. We value parents. We value siblings. We value spouses. We value grandparents. We value nature-lovers. We value people who watch TV or read books or play video games. We value people who excel at their sport or hobby, dancing, music, painting, gardening, whatever. We value good friends. We value everyone who has a positive attitude on life, and helps to spread that joy to their community.
Free Prestige = Mandatory Marriage and Children. The purpose of status is to acquire more women and thus more reproductive opportunity. The 'currency' of status is sex. The only way to freely and equally distribute status through a community, is to uphold nuclear, monogamous, unending marriage for everyone. This way from the highest executive to the lowest dog-catcher, there is still someone who loves you and has eyes only for you. If they don't love you, oh well, they'll learn to get by making love to you, because there's no better option allowed. And your children will love you, because they, at least, can't help but look up to their mother or father. You will have a place, a role, in society. You will be someone's spouse, someone's parent, someone's sibling, someone's SOMETHING, your whole life. This is freely distributed status, this is prestige in the ultimate sense -- you are no longer on the outside of life looking in. You're in the very middle of it, the very core of its expression, in the cycle of death and rebirth. You will be the most important person in the world to someone. You'll have the power to change someone's life. So make it for the better. ;).
Why should everyone capable of truth, beauty, and love, be given these communist distributions of wealth and status? Because they earned it. Under my system, they earned it, just like everyone else did. They earned it by being who they were, and having some part of the absolute Good, the Goddess-seeds, of Love, Beauty, and Truth in their souls. They didn't earn as much wealth as the best of us, they only earned the living wage pittance of the citizen's dividend. They didn't earn the most attractive wife/husband, they only earned whoever settled for them before they hit 20. There is still a huge field for competition, for self-enrichment, for distinguishment. That's not the issue. The issue is, we can either have some basic floor for our community, where we do not let people fall off the edge of the world because they have no purpose in life whatsoever, and no value whatsoever to the rest of the living (and mind you, increasingly, the segment of the population that qualifies for this designation is over 50%), or whether we let the world go to the wolves, and it becomes a place suited only to the super-rich, the alpha males, and the women who father bastards off of them and toil away at all the shit jobs underneath. A worldwide harem, complete with beta male eunechs and slaves everywhere outside, looking enviously in, and wishing they had never been born.
The logic of the technological system will, sooner or later, complete its transformation of the world into super wealth concentrations (10% of the population owning 70% of the wealth), alpha male reproducers who impregnate all the women, self-employed women raising their children alone, and endless droves of bachelors and whores who exist on the margins of life, or are simply snuffed out entirely. This logic only continues so long as we continue to live as homo economicus.
The logic of my value system gives everyone a seat at the table, while also distinguishing better from worse. It does not reward evil, or equate evil to good, but instead vigorously defends itself against it -- whether they be poor like blacks, or rich like Jews. A system that is better at protecting the white race from replacement, than any economic system, which practically guarantees our demise. A system that more accurately captures the whole of human experience, and explains what exactly it means to be human, and what it means to be a good human, rather than just a piss-poor machine that has to sleep 1/3 of the time.
And if the rich and powerful won't go along with it, because they don't see why it would be worth the effort if they can't get all the money and all the women to themselves, well let them hire us as their servants then. We could be governesses, nannies, butlers, maids, cooks, whatever. They could leave the kids in our hands and go out wining and dining every day. Just stop making us work at truly worthless jobs, at least give us the same level of self-respect, as the poor used to have in the 1800's. Lifelong employment in a kind of 'second home', your customers being the same family you've helped raise generation after generation, is not so bad. Those jobs may be largely vanity jobs, but they could relieve some time and energy off the hands of our betters. It is some service to them, however little. And we want to live. We want to have a family. Is that so much to ask?
A citizen's dividend and mandatory monogamous marriage is enough to give everyone a meaningful, productive, and happy life. Productive because the most productive activity possible is to bear and raise children, no matter what else you manage in life. Happy because you were given the means to do so and recognized the inherent value in doing it. Meaningful because opening our souls to Truth Beauty and Love, are the only meaningful acts in life. They're what the animals, and the rocks, and the machines, cannot do. They are our keys to divinity. To the sacred. To man qua man.
As a bonus, it's the only objective, universal belief system that requires whites as a race are preserved, until we ourselves agree that we are redundant and no longer needed. It is internally and externally consistent. It does not play favorites. It simply sets forth a principle, and then holds onto it like a badger. That is the kind of thinking people can respect.
This doesn't even take into account students, children, retirees, housewives, prisoners, and so on. Perhaps if we added it all up, we'd have over 50% of the population not actually employed. Since employment and the wages and healthcare benefits derived thereof are the foundation of our society, what does it mean when the majority of people no longer even fit into this foundation?
It means that the majority of people in our society are made into marginal, disrespected pariahs, who feel intensely guilty, ashamed, or resentful because they cannot fit into a society that increasingly has no interest in or accomodation for their existence. (and, we can imagine, just wishes they would go die in a hole somewhere and stop bothering us.)
It isn't just America facing this problem, the whole world is in a crisis, or will soon be in a crisis, of redundant population. I believe the world is overpopulated, but really that's not the issue. It is still possible to feed, clothe, and provide shelter for everyone alive on earth, even if that is not environmentally sustainable forever. The real issue is population redundancy. It's when people exist, and there are still resources to provide for them, but there is no place for them in society. They can't enter the workforce. No one loves them. No one respects them. They have no role to play and no connection to the outside world. How high is the population redundancy rate? Terrifying.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/xx.html
As you can see, 40.5% of the labor force is occupied in agriculture. And yet, in a modern technological society, say the USA, only .6% of the population is engaged in farming, foresting, and fishing combined. .6%! The USA was built out of farmers and is some of the richest farmland on earth. Dozens of states are best known for their massive farmlands, from Iowa to Montana, from Texas to North Carolina, even California has a giant agricultural industry. And yet, for all that, it only occupies .6% of the labor force. We can imagine then that this .6% number is not because the USA neglects farming, but because it has no use in employing any additional numbers. Machines can produce more crops per acre, cheaper, than any additional manpower. Let's say the people in America employed in farming alone is .5% and ignore our lumberjacks and fishermen. This is a useful number, because, lo and behold, this means 40% of the world's population is in fact redundant. They continue to till their fields with their hoes, and shovels, and clear rocks from the ground, pound in posts with mallets, feed their pigs and chickens by hand, milk their cows by hand, and so on. They think they are productive. People still think they are 'good' people, the salt of the earth, and they can still probably find wives and have children. But if modern technology ever caught up to them, they would suddenly realize it was much more efficient for 40% of the workforce to be lined up and mowed down by a machine gun, and the remaining .5% to consolidate all the farmland into giant machine-tended fields.
Lining them all up and gunning them down with a machine gun is perhaps the more merciful tactic. Suppose instead we simply bankrupt them through capitalist competition and then buy out their land to set up our commercial machine run farms on. These people will then be wandering around homeless, perhaps taken in by relatives, or flooding already overpopulated cities in search of work where there is none to be had. They will likely be single, spat upon, despised, mocked, and abused. The women can always turn to prostitution or somesuch, where they will gradually sicken and die of AIDS, but is that really better than the machine-gun line either?
The truth is, a billion+ people are living in a time warp. They are farming, but they are losing money every day they farm. They are working, but their work is worse than useless. They are simply taking up valuable land that could be exploited much better if they would just get off it and hand it over to the machines and overseers that currently rule the USA's agribusiness. These people have no economic worth. It looks like they're employed, but their employment is no different than say, being employed to move a sheet of glass back and forth across a road. Or to dig a hole and then fill it back in with dirt, over and over. If they currently receive respect and love from their community, it is only because their community is as equally backwards as they are, living in the same time warp, and unaware, like Brazilian tribesmen in the rainforest, at just how comical and futile all their activity is to the outside world.
A billion people who will sooner or later through globalization be economically displaced is bad enough. (Even worse would be if they were never displaced, because then they would go on their dirty manual stone age lives forever, until the sun blew up, scratching a meager existence out of the earth when everyone else has moved on to higher productivity and thus great riches and comforts.) But who is to say it will stop there? I don't think farming is the only sector modern machinery has made redundant, it's just the most obvious.
Manufacturing can largely be done by machines now. The involvement of humans is declining per product made. The same is true of resource extraction. Mining in China may still be a matter of men with shovels chiseling through rocks, but in the modern world it's usually just a guy on the surface staring at his computer terminal. Transportation is another job that is being, or could be, completely automated. Mailmen could be replaced by email. Truckers could be replaced by automatic trains (why not? Japan has them already.) Or if that isn't good enough, DARPA has already succeeded in making cars that drive themselves. If the cars can't navigate human traffic conditions yet, we could just build a lane for them alone, so that computer driven trucks would always be seen going endlessly back and forth like red blood cells throughout the nation, never sleeping, day or night, and thus far more efficient than any human could attempt.
Shopping markets don't actually need clerks, you can simply check yourself out at the computer. The same is true of gas stations, where you simply fill your tank up, swipe your credit card through, and drive off. There may need to be one or two humans overlooking the whole enterprise, but again, machines have replaced most of the labor force.
Anything involving muscle power is gone. The military is also simply ornamental these days. The power of nuclear missles is sufficient to destroy any army of any number of humans, or the country they come from, such that humans can no longer really serve a purpose on the battlefield. All current wars fought by human beings are not wars of self defense, where nuclear weapons would be sufficient, they are wars of choice, fought out of pure luxury. If most of the military were fired like they should be, it would become even more apparent how utterly useless men, in particular, were for any job anymore.
I'm afraid most employment these days is not real. It is entirely illusionary, just like the subsistence farmers who spend all day every day collecting chicken eggs by hand, hoeing their fields by hand, planting seeds by hand, and so on, living hand to mouth and a drought away from ruin. These people aren't really employed, they're simply ossified fossils trapped in amber. You could call them zoos of neolithic mankind. Everyone else has moved on, they serve no real purpose to the rest of us, and are just a eminent domain away from being eradicated. (like the brazilian rainforest tribes). The population of the Earth that has been or could be replaced by machine labor is not just one billion, it's billions. Every year this number will grow, not shrink, as computers become ever faster and more able.
But what of re-education and job training? Isn't the capitalist system about firing people so that they can develop new skills and create new jobs and make us all wealthier?
Well yes, that's the concept. But it completely ignores IQ. For one thing, most subsistence farmers are dead as door nails dumb. They live in India or Africa, with IQ's of 70-80. They could never be trained to operate machinery, start their own business, or do anything else of use that the 'vibrant capitalist free market' could wish of them. Maybe there is a high demand for time travel tourism, and in a perfect world, all the people unemployed by machines could just turn into time travel tour guides. But the fact is, people who are unemployed are not capable of just switching to some other job specialty. They never got a decent education in the first place, there's no infrastructure available to give them a decent education now, and even if there were, they'd be too dumb to take advantage of it. So if they can't be turned into 20th dimensional quantum pill inventors, like the capitalist model says they should be doing, what are we going to do with our redundant population?
The modern answer has been atrocious. Through heavy taxation, governments have managed to hire practically 1/2 the workforce into government jobs. What do these people do? Nothing, really. They push paper around. They stamp forms. They issue licenses. They inspect homes. They manage other government workers. They basically pick up glass and move it back and forth across roads. This is incredibly expensive, but it's also demoralizing. When people are working, they want to see something good come out of their work. A happy customer. A beautiful finished good. A hearty field of grain. A bridge or a road people can use. Work like that is fulfilling, it's good for the soul, it makes people feel like they're making a difference. When people simply stare into computer consoles or fill in files all day, how can they deceive themselves that they're doing anything but collecting welfare? And how can the outside world view them as anything but obnoxious, interfering parasites constantly taxing and regulating the genuine working world? Bossing around their betters because they were too inferior to actually achieve anything?
The other answer has been equally vile. There are people who have found niches in the modern economy, not by out-achieving their machine-equivalents, but by using their intelligence and understanding of the human psyche, to prey off the rest of us. This is called 'customer service,' 'sales,' 'marketing,' 'advertising,' 'lawyers,' 'brokers,' another 25% of the entire labor force. Not to mention anyone who owns a retail store is just one giant walking advertisement. All manufactured goods could be kept in concrete warehouses without any windows or any people looking after them. If someone wanted a product, they could order it online, and then it could be shipped directly from the warehouse to the buyer in a few days. The advantage of the retail outlet isn't that 'all-important 3 days faster,' because that's completely offset by the extra expense needed to have small stores with people dotted all around the country offering these goods. The real advantage is the prospect of placing the products in such an appealing fashion, that people will spontaneously choose to buy something they didn't need and hadn't even thought of getting. With that in mind, we can place all retail sales as just another segment of the advertising economy.
Why does advertising exist? In the age of the internet, if people want something -- a job, a house, a car, a book, a washing machine -- they can simply type it into a search engine and find exactly the product they need. This is the exact opposite of advertising, which seeks to intrude on people's time or senses and convince them to spontaneously buy something they didn't actually want before. The entire modern economy is about getting people to buy stuff they didn't actually want, through subliminal messages and careful psychological manipulations, like placing attractive women next to the products, or showing really cool people using the product that you could be like, and so on. People, by watching these ads, are generally trying to buy status, women, friends, power, or some other ineffable product. Instead all they ever get is plastic junk, which breaks or is eventually stowed away in the garage/attic, never to be seen again. They never learn though. How could they? The people being conned have a lower IQ than the conmen. And no matter how hard they try to learn not to buy stuff, they are competing with people who spend their entire lives learning how to MAKE them buy stuff. The sales departments, the marketing departments, spent 8 years in college learning how to trick you into buying their product, then spent the next 40 years of their working lives continuously improving on and innovating from that knowledge. What's a low IQ person who, after all, has to spend at least some time thinking about HIS job to do in defense against this all out blitz? It's the same with lawyers and brokers, insurance agents and all the rest -- people who spend their lives advertising to people about how much they're needed, how great it would be to buy their services, when in fact all of these people should be avoided like the plague. They are the vampire elite, they get rich off of the lifeblood of others -- their quarrels, their fears, their greed, any vice you have, there is a group of people eager to coax you into living by it to their gain.
In a properly run society, we would simply ban vampirism. People should not be allowed to profit off of, or encourage, the mistakes and vices of others. If anything, people should be employed to minimize other people's mistakes and vices, not inflate them all while skimming a salary from it off the top. In that case, all of these jobs would also become redundant.
What jobs aren't redundant, from an objective point of view?
The military should be reduced to near nothing.
The bureaucracy should be reduced to near nothing.
Transportation, Farming, and Resource Extraction should be automated.
Advertising, Marketing and Sales should be replaced by internet search engines.
Retail stores should be replaced by warehouses and online stores.
Vampiric practices like usury, divorce courts, health insurance, should all be banned.
Clerks should just be computer checkout stations.
Manufacturing can be nearly automated.
Okay, so who is actually employed? Who isn't redundant? Maybe now you can grasp why the majority of America's people are already redundant, because we are furthest along the internal logic of a technological society? Can you also see why none of these jobs are coming back? That the unemployed, are going to stay unemployed, and only grow, as time goes by? Can you also see that it's no better to employ redundant populations in parasitic makework than to not employ them at all?
What we're left with is the tiny sector of the economy that's still valuable. Construction, Repairmen, Doctors + Nurses, Teachers, Police, Firemen, Scientists, Engineers, Artists, Entertainers, Architects, Managers.
Add to these groups, the tiny fraction necessary for all the other fields, like for instance the .5% of Americans who are still farmers and are essential, the manufacturers who can't be automated, and so on.
Most of the positions our economy still needs to fill require a high IQ. Therefore we can ignore them as a possibility in employing our redundant populations. This narrows it down to nurses who tend to our elderly, teachers and day care centers that provide for our kids, construction workers, repairmen, and firemen who tend to our buildings, and police who protect us from each other. Let's look at this a little more closely to see just how distorted the modern economy is:
Couldn't we remove and nurses for the elderly by just having children take care of their own parents in their own homes, or just letting them die if they're so far gone no one can treat them? Furthermore, couldn't we remove teachers and day care centers, by having parents raise their own kids instead of out source it to other women? Out of the truly productive jobs, most of them were dealt with in the past by stay-at-home moms. Housewives. The remainder -- construction workers, repairmen, police and firemen, are all traditional masculine roles. They could be filled by those good ol' 9-5 jobs where men left their wives with a kiss and came back to a steaming hot dinner. As for the high IQ jobs of management, art, science, engineering, etc, that has always been a place almost solely reserved for men. Restricting women from employment does not actually hurt the economy -- because the true economic function of women has never BEEN in the economy.
The most productive task imaginable in humanity is bearing children. The second most productive task imaginable, is rearing children. Women already do the two most important jobs in life, and no one else can do them. They are built to do them, and they are excellent at the task, far surpassing men. That IS their contribution to the economy. The economy, in fact, exists solely to keep them, and the children, provided for while the women go about doing this all-important work. Men are not the center of life, we are at the bare fringe, the edge. We are the icing on the cake. They can do without us, and it looks like they intend to do without us for the most part, from here on. If we wish to continue existing on this planet as a non-redundant, non-despised, non-exiled population, it will take a reevaluation of values. Are people valuable because they can get a job? Because they can make money? Because they fulfill some vital task in the economy? Or is it because of something else?
My viewpoint is 'something else.' People are valuable insofar as they experience, and create the experience of, love, beauty, and truth. A person who believes the Truth is valuable, whether he ever picks up a shovel in his life. A person who gazes adoringly at Nature, or Women, or a math equation, is valuable, whether he ever harvests a crop or not. A person who loves his wife, his children, his friends, or even his dog, is valuable, whether he hammers a nail or not.
Even more valuable than the above, though predicated upon the value of the above, (as there would be no use in creating love, beauty, or truth, if no one enjoyed possessing it.) are the scientists, philosophers, artists, architects, etc, who create new wealth and value to the universe, the ex nihilo cornucopias that grace us with masterpieces in every field. The economy may have no use for them, the economy may never reward them (just look at poor Nietzsche, Tchaikovsky, or Socrates), but Nature is the grander for their existence, and the people who drunk of their fruit.
Through this prism, there is no redundant population. People are valuable not insofar as their material productivity (which is largely zero for the majority of mankind), but instead for their emotional productivity. The most emotionally productive people on earth are white people. They have all the genius artists and scientists. They are the most eager to embrace the Truth, wherever it leads them, and upset old traditional Errors and Customs that get in the way. They are the most loving people on earth -- towards each other, towards outsiders, towards their wife and children, even towards animals. Whites are the most beautiful people on earth. Therefore, through this new criterion of value, not economic, it becomes clear that
A) the redundant population is those people who cannot enjoy love, beauty, or truth. Or cause more harm to it than they add benefit to it. (So, basically, blacks and jews? :). In truth this cuts through all races, though disproportionately.)
B) Though many non-white people are valuable, in a world of finite resources, the greatest allocation of value would be to promote the welfare of the most valuable people. In this case, we should at all costs preserve our most precious sample of mankind, the white race. And secondarily, where there is a necessary conflict of interests, we should support the whites, not their enemies, regardless of how good they might be.
Armed with this new tool of insight, what should modern employment look like? Let's keep the necessary jobs, by all means. But let's cut all the other jobs. The redundant jobs. Instead of people working for prestige and wages, even though all their work is parasitic, or makework, and could easily be replaced by machines or simply not done anymore, let's give them prestige and wages for free, and let them go home already.
Free wages = The Citizen's Dividend. Our recognition as a people that many of us cannot be measured by our economic productivity, and that the value of our existence is not a simple matter of what job we can hold. That so long as we have the money, we will show that we do value people's existence, whether they work or not, and we think it's worth our effort and resources, that they go on living. We value parents. We value siblings. We value spouses. We value grandparents. We value nature-lovers. We value people who watch TV or read books or play video games. We value people who excel at their sport or hobby, dancing, music, painting, gardening, whatever. We value good friends. We value everyone who has a positive attitude on life, and helps to spread that joy to their community.
Free Prestige = Mandatory Marriage and Children. The purpose of status is to acquire more women and thus more reproductive opportunity. The 'currency' of status is sex. The only way to freely and equally distribute status through a community, is to uphold nuclear, monogamous, unending marriage for everyone. This way from the highest executive to the lowest dog-catcher, there is still someone who loves you and has eyes only for you. If they don't love you, oh well, they'll learn to get by making love to you, because there's no better option allowed. And your children will love you, because they, at least, can't help but look up to their mother or father. You will have a place, a role, in society. You will be someone's spouse, someone's parent, someone's sibling, someone's SOMETHING, your whole life. This is freely distributed status, this is prestige in the ultimate sense -- you are no longer on the outside of life looking in. You're in the very middle of it, the very core of its expression, in the cycle of death and rebirth. You will be the most important person in the world to someone. You'll have the power to change someone's life. So make it for the better. ;).
Why should everyone capable of truth, beauty, and love, be given these communist distributions of wealth and status? Because they earned it. Under my system, they earned it, just like everyone else did. They earned it by being who they were, and having some part of the absolute Good, the Goddess-seeds, of Love, Beauty, and Truth in their souls. They didn't earn as much wealth as the best of us, they only earned the living wage pittance of the citizen's dividend. They didn't earn the most attractive wife/husband, they only earned whoever settled for them before they hit 20. There is still a huge field for competition, for self-enrichment, for distinguishment. That's not the issue. The issue is, we can either have some basic floor for our community, where we do not let people fall off the edge of the world because they have no purpose in life whatsoever, and no value whatsoever to the rest of the living (and mind you, increasingly, the segment of the population that qualifies for this designation is over 50%), or whether we let the world go to the wolves, and it becomes a place suited only to the super-rich, the alpha males, and the women who father bastards off of them and toil away at all the shit jobs underneath. A worldwide harem, complete with beta male eunechs and slaves everywhere outside, looking enviously in, and wishing they had never been born.
The logic of the technological system will, sooner or later, complete its transformation of the world into super wealth concentrations (10% of the population owning 70% of the wealth), alpha male reproducers who impregnate all the women, self-employed women raising their children alone, and endless droves of bachelors and whores who exist on the margins of life, or are simply snuffed out entirely. This logic only continues so long as we continue to live as homo economicus.
The logic of my value system gives everyone a seat at the table, while also distinguishing better from worse. It does not reward evil, or equate evil to good, but instead vigorously defends itself against it -- whether they be poor like blacks, or rich like Jews. A system that is better at protecting the white race from replacement, than any economic system, which practically guarantees our demise. A system that more accurately captures the whole of human experience, and explains what exactly it means to be human, and what it means to be a good human, rather than just a piss-poor machine that has to sleep 1/3 of the time.
And if the rich and powerful won't go along with it, because they don't see why it would be worth the effort if they can't get all the money and all the women to themselves, well let them hire us as their servants then. We could be governesses, nannies, butlers, maids, cooks, whatever. They could leave the kids in our hands and go out wining and dining every day. Just stop making us work at truly worthless jobs, at least give us the same level of self-respect, as the poor used to have in the 1800's. Lifelong employment in a kind of 'second home', your customers being the same family you've helped raise generation after generation, is not so bad. Those jobs may be largely vanity jobs, but they could relieve some time and energy off the hands of our betters. It is some service to them, however little. And we want to live. We want to have a family. Is that so much to ask?
A citizen's dividend and mandatory monogamous marriage is enough to give everyone a meaningful, productive, and happy life. Productive because the most productive activity possible is to bear and raise children, no matter what else you manage in life. Happy because you were given the means to do so and recognized the inherent value in doing it. Meaningful because opening our souls to Truth Beauty and Love, are the only meaningful acts in life. They're what the animals, and the rocks, and the machines, cannot do. They are our keys to divinity. To the sacred. To man qua man.
As a bonus, it's the only objective, universal belief system that requires whites as a race are preserved, until we ourselves agree that we are redundant and no longer needed. It is internally and externally consistent. It does not play favorites. It simply sets forth a principle, and then holds onto it like a badger. That is the kind of thinking people can respect.
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
The jigsaw puzzle comes together:
http://whiskeys-place.blogspot.com/2009/09/ashley-madison-marriage-redefined.html
I encourage everyone to read this post and study his graphs and statistics, that bear out everything I've been saying.
Of course, Whiskey's failure is to suggest any cure to these problems. That's where unafraid truth tellers have to step in and propose the unthinkable, rather than just whine about how bad things are and maintain their social status among their peers by not rocking the boat: A law that requires everyone marry by age 20 and have 2 children by age 25 while banning adultery would solve this societal collapse neatly and efficiently. Until we stop pitying the poor women who have to 'settle' on their high school sweetheart or someone their parents introduced them to or someone who scientific tests show would be a good match, and start pitying the poor men of today who will never get anyone, ever, change won't happen. As a utilitarian, the question is simple. Would we be happier or sadder, as a whole, if people were required to marry and have two children each by age 25 and adultery were banned? Is today's current society, so well shown in its degeneracy by Whiskey's post, more or less calamitous to the people living in it, than one where marriage was required by age 20 and divorce was nearly impossible and adultery outright illegal?
Once it's established that the world would in fact be a better place if the nuclear family were restored, even if it means trampling over the individual rights of women to headhunt for alpha males, or lead soulless hedonistic lives of endless debauchery, or genocide the entire race by not having children, then what are we waiting for?
Like pieces to an enormous puzzle, it's obvious what the law code of the White Republic should look like:
Aristocracy will replace Democracy.
The Citizen's Dividend will replace Socialism.
The Nuclear Family will replace Women's Liberation.
Eugenics will replace dysgenics.
Science will replace religion.
Truth, Beauty, and Love, will replace Tolerance, Equality, and Freedom.
Homogeneity will replace diversity.
Montessori Schooling and Moral Training will replace Public Education.
IQ and Personality tests will replace Credentialism/College.
Apprenticeships will replace College/Job Training/Temp Workers.
Profit Sharing ala stock market will replace interest bearing loans.
Government mints will replace the Federal Reserve.
Carefully chosen books, music, movies will replace the influence of the jews.
There are a variety of problems facing the modern world. There is no single cause for our people's decline. It is an extremely complex and multifaceted problem. The creation of a new state is the only clean slate that can address them all simultaneously.
The problems with democracy are well documented, the benefits of aristocracy are obvious. Rule by our betters is superior to rule by our inferiors.
The citizen's dividend's benefits are well documented, it is obviously superior to socialism. Everyone getting a living wage simply for existing, is better than endless targeted programs that inflate the bureaucracy, fail to deliver the promised products, needless interference with the free market, rule by special interests, and all the rest of the corruption. It would also be cheaper than the taxes we are already spending and doesn't create any debt like socialism has. (to the tune of 70 trillion dollars of unpaid liabilities.)
The Nuclear Family, as enforced by a set of laws that read: Adultery is illegal, Divorce is practically impossible (less than 1%), Marriage is required by age 20, 2 children are required by age 25, women cannot work more than part time until their children are raised. Reinforced by the power of the Citizen's Dividend that ensures the financial contribution of the wife in a marriage, and the security of the children they have, whether the parents have a job or not.
Eugenics, as enforced by laws that read: Children with known genetic errors will be screened and aborted. Parents who are clearly dysfunctional via IQ or personality or health testing, or exhibit atrocious behavior unfitting of a parent will no longer be allowed to have children. Parents of good genes, high IQ, and good behavior, will be elevated to the nobility and can pass this title onto their children, with all the power, privilege, status and wealth that goes with it. However the children's children will not gain nobility from their grandparents, but will again only be nobility if their parents deserve it. This 'phasing-out' of hereditary privilege allows downward and upward mobility, but also rewards nobles who have large families, and gives a certain measure of stability and self-awareness to noble children. The death penalty for all felony crime will also have a eugenic effect. If you cannot follow the rules, we don't want you.
Science over religion: Principally through our education, but also at home, parents should pass these teachings down to their children. That all organized religions are simply charlatans and liars, that miracles do not exist, that everything happens for a reason that science can discover and explain. Only by relying on science can we achieve our full potential, as masters of the universe and the pinnacle of evolution. Without science, we will all die like ants when this world inevitably is destroyed by other humans, disease, meteors, flooding, lack of CO2, the sun exploding, a supernova of a nearby star, etc. God has never saved anyone and never will, no afterlife awaits us except in the blood of our descendants and the seeds we plant in their minds.
A new morality -- That our life has a deep and wonderful meaning, because we can experience Love, Beauty, and Truth, and our goal is to make the whole universe resonate with these three themes, an otherwise empty meaningless dead void. That these three Goods are absolute and inviolate, and it is the duty of all people to be moral and uphold them in every moment and choice of their lives. That these goods are so Good, that any means necessary to achieve them, are themselves moral thereby.
That no man can serve two masters, and therefore no nation can serve two people's, two cultures, two goals, two dreams, or two of anything. That in order to succeed at something, everyone must unite behind it. That we have an important, absolute goal, and there is no room for anyone who doesn't believe in it or contribute to it. In short, that only a homogeneous nation, not a diverse nation, has any worth. This homogeneity need not be genetic, though I suspect it largely would be, because beliefs, personality, and IQ are genetic -- but it must be strictly upkept and enforced, through education to those born (or exile of those who can't fit in), and strict immigration controls for those who wish in. However, those who are non-white, should have to marry whites, and whites should always be at least 90% of the population, for the sake of civic unity and stability.
A new education, as outlined in my 'towards a new education' plan, and elaborated upon by any well-meaning thinkers, that serves the true goal of creating a moral individual who can discern right from wrong and true from false, with a firm identity, in accordance with the overall culture and wishes of their ancestors.
IQ tracking and personality tests (which already are scientifically valid, but we should work to improve dramatically. . .just look how successful eharmony was at quantifying what makes a good match for marriage, by relying on personality tests.), to replace college and credentialism. College is a waste of time and money. Aside from a few obscure roles, a living breathing teacher is not necessary to obtain knowledge. Lectures could simply be posted online, forums could chat online and a pool of students/instructors could answer whatever questions you currently had, and so on. Extremely bright people should not be wasting time or money getting a piece of paper saying what a simple IQ test could verify in 15 minutes -- I'm smart and should be given a good job with lots of responsibility. Charles Murray already proved in the bell curve that IQ was a better indicator of job productivity than a college degree in that field. It's time to close down this worthless racket, and in doing so, give men back the jobs they have lost to women, who are better at college but worse at the job itself.
Apprenticeships, years where businesses train their own employees at their own expense, will replace all current job training, college, and the like. If a business wants a good worker, it should have to make one. If a job really is extremely complex and requires years to learn, then people should be taught by actually being on the job, watching the people doing it, being guided through the steps, not in some classroom learning about it theoretically. Just as its easier to learn a language through submersion in the actual country it's spoken in than years of classroom teaching, it is easier to learn a job by doing, than by hearing about it in a classroom for years. Businesses will no longer have endless access to foreign labor, or H-1B visas, or whatever, and therefore if they want workers, they will have to invest in them. The citizen's dividend will also require people are paid a decent wage -- or they won't even bother working. Stuff it, fat cats. This would also solve all our unemployment problems.
In order to avoid the trap of endless debt, loans will no longer be issued to fund people's dreams or aspirations. If someone wants to found a business, a bank can offer to fund it in return for a % of the profits, just like the maritime ventures during the age of exploration. The same for all other capital expenditures. As far as consumption goes, people will have to rely on buying big ticket items with their citizen's dividend they've been saving up. Or their parent's citizen's dividend, or their rich uncle's citizen's dividend, etc. People will no longer consume more than they can afford, or use more money than our country actually has to offer.
There will no longer be inflation or funny money. The federal reserve is toast. All money will stand for some real product or value that our country has actually produced. As technology improves, prices should go down, not up, every year. Since there are no loans anymore, deflation would have no adverse affect on anyone, it would just quietly make everyone richer as time went by. Of course, if there isn't enough money to conduct business efficiently, we can always mint more. But it will be at our public discretion, not made by capitalists smoking cigars behind closed rooms.
Suitable entertainment and stories for such a society will be dredged up from our thousands of years of cultural history, new media supported by the government or private citizens will create new, suitable, and carefully supervised entertainment. The sewage pipe of Hollywood's influence that drowned America will not be allowed to re-appear. Mental Pollution will be considered just as important as physical pollution.
Have I left parts of the system out? No doubt. But the point is, everything has to be changed at once. There is no single problem afflicting the world today, it's a multitude of problems, arising out of a multitude of different groups. Corporations are robbing the proletariat blind. Immigrants are diversifying and fracturing our civic unity. Stupid people are outbreeding smart people. Crime is everywhere. Men can no longer find life partners, women are no longer having children. Morality has turned into a charade, where simply mouthing the right platitudes is more important than people's own behavior. Bureaucrats are paper pushing our tax dollars around but delivering no valuable service. Entertainment has become debased, and debases its audience in turn. Education is indoctrinating people into the wrong beliefs, and not providing any useful skills. Religion is hopelessly outdated and suitable only for superstitious cave men, not a technological society that requires science for everything we do. So on and so forth. There are problems everywhere -- but the proper system, the proper law code, can solve all of them simultaneously. With the right laws, we can form a righteous people and a righteous nation. It is possible to create a utopia, totalitarianism does work. We simply have to take into account human nature, and build our laws around this nature, instead of trying to violate it. Furthermore, by concentrating on eugenics (and later genetic engineering), we can shape our people into any mold we please, thus getting rid of the roadblock of human nature altogether. In a dozen generations we could have any sort of people we desired.
What's important is partially the innate power level of the people who form the nation, but desperately more so, their philosophical dedication to the cause. If the people simply stick to these laws, we will succeed. Just like Solon or Lycurgus, who handed down their laws to Athens and Sparta, with the strict condition that they must be obeyed and stuck to unchanged forever, gave those people a 500 year golden age, unrivaled by anything else on Earth at the time -- this law code, so long as it is revered and upkept, will make us the greatest people in history. Dedication to the cause, to the laws, to the culture, to the nation, to the chain of being that is ancestors, the present, and descendants all united in one single body for one great purpose -- this is our true strength. By it we succeed or fail, everything else can be provided by the law, even our intelligence, even our personalities, can be raised by successful application of the law -- but dedication to the law must come of our own free wills first. What we need is a nation of true believers, not of slaves or oppressed folk or conscripts. With true believers, anything is possible. So for now, we delineate this new vision, this new clean slate we are replacing everything with, and recruit the true believers we need. There are enough desperately miserable people on earth, enough people driven to the brink by what is happening in this world, that there should always be converts willing to listen to our dreams. When we're strong enough, we implement it -- and the new history of a new people, with a new philosophy, with a new law code, with a new everything, will begin.
Better than everything that came before. Better than anyone who came before. The hope of the universe.
I encourage everyone to read this post and study his graphs and statistics, that bear out everything I've been saying.
Of course, Whiskey's failure is to suggest any cure to these problems. That's where unafraid truth tellers have to step in and propose the unthinkable, rather than just whine about how bad things are and maintain their social status among their peers by not rocking the boat: A law that requires everyone marry by age 20 and have 2 children by age 25 while banning adultery would solve this societal collapse neatly and efficiently. Until we stop pitying the poor women who have to 'settle' on their high school sweetheart or someone their parents introduced them to or someone who scientific tests show would be a good match, and start pitying the poor men of today who will never get anyone, ever, change won't happen. As a utilitarian, the question is simple. Would we be happier or sadder, as a whole, if people were required to marry and have two children each by age 25 and adultery were banned? Is today's current society, so well shown in its degeneracy by Whiskey's post, more or less calamitous to the people living in it, than one where marriage was required by age 20 and divorce was nearly impossible and adultery outright illegal?
Once it's established that the world would in fact be a better place if the nuclear family were restored, even if it means trampling over the individual rights of women to headhunt for alpha males, or lead soulless hedonistic lives of endless debauchery, or genocide the entire race by not having children, then what are we waiting for?
Like pieces to an enormous puzzle, it's obvious what the law code of the White Republic should look like:
Aristocracy will replace Democracy.
The Citizen's Dividend will replace Socialism.
The Nuclear Family will replace Women's Liberation.
Eugenics will replace dysgenics.
Science will replace religion.
Truth, Beauty, and Love, will replace Tolerance, Equality, and Freedom.
Homogeneity will replace diversity.
Montessori Schooling and Moral Training will replace Public Education.
IQ and Personality tests will replace Credentialism/College.
Apprenticeships will replace College/Job Training/Temp Workers.
Profit Sharing ala stock market will replace interest bearing loans.
Government mints will replace the Federal Reserve.
Carefully chosen books, music, movies will replace the influence of the jews.
There are a variety of problems facing the modern world. There is no single cause for our people's decline. It is an extremely complex and multifaceted problem. The creation of a new state is the only clean slate that can address them all simultaneously.
The problems with democracy are well documented, the benefits of aristocracy are obvious. Rule by our betters is superior to rule by our inferiors.
The citizen's dividend's benefits are well documented, it is obviously superior to socialism. Everyone getting a living wage simply for existing, is better than endless targeted programs that inflate the bureaucracy, fail to deliver the promised products, needless interference with the free market, rule by special interests, and all the rest of the corruption. It would also be cheaper than the taxes we are already spending and doesn't create any debt like socialism has. (to the tune of 70 trillion dollars of unpaid liabilities.)
The Nuclear Family, as enforced by a set of laws that read: Adultery is illegal, Divorce is practically impossible (less than 1%), Marriage is required by age 20, 2 children are required by age 25, women cannot work more than part time until their children are raised. Reinforced by the power of the Citizen's Dividend that ensures the financial contribution of the wife in a marriage, and the security of the children they have, whether the parents have a job or not.
Eugenics, as enforced by laws that read: Children with known genetic errors will be screened and aborted. Parents who are clearly dysfunctional via IQ or personality or health testing, or exhibit atrocious behavior unfitting of a parent will no longer be allowed to have children. Parents of good genes, high IQ, and good behavior, will be elevated to the nobility and can pass this title onto their children, with all the power, privilege, status and wealth that goes with it. However the children's children will not gain nobility from their grandparents, but will again only be nobility if their parents deserve it. This 'phasing-out' of hereditary privilege allows downward and upward mobility, but also rewards nobles who have large families, and gives a certain measure of stability and self-awareness to noble children. The death penalty for all felony crime will also have a eugenic effect. If you cannot follow the rules, we don't want you.
Science over religion: Principally through our education, but also at home, parents should pass these teachings down to their children. That all organized religions are simply charlatans and liars, that miracles do not exist, that everything happens for a reason that science can discover and explain. Only by relying on science can we achieve our full potential, as masters of the universe and the pinnacle of evolution. Without science, we will all die like ants when this world inevitably is destroyed by other humans, disease, meteors, flooding, lack of CO2, the sun exploding, a supernova of a nearby star, etc. God has never saved anyone and never will, no afterlife awaits us except in the blood of our descendants and the seeds we plant in their minds.
A new morality -- That our life has a deep and wonderful meaning, because we can experience Love, Beauty, and Truth, and our goal is to make the whole universe resonate with these three themes, an otherwise empty meaningless dead void. That these three Goods are absolute and inviolate, and it is the duty of all people to be moral and uphold them in every moment and choice of their lives. That these goods are so Good, that any means necessary to achieve them, are themselves moral thereby.
That no man can serve two masters, and therefore no nation can serve two people's, two cultures, two goals, two dreams, or two of anything. That in order to succeed at something, everyone must unite behind it. That we have an important, absolute goal, and there is no room for anyone who doesn't believe in it or contribute to it. In short, that only a homogeneous nation, not a diverse nation, has any worth. This homogeneity need not be genetic, though I suspect it largely would be, because beliefs, personality, and IQ are genetic -- but it must be strictly upkept and enforced, through education to those born (or exile of those who can't fit in), and strict immigration controls for those who wish in. However, those who are non-white, should have to marry whites, and whites should always be at least 90% of the population, for the sake of civic unity and stability.
A new education, as outlined in my 'towards a new education' plan, and elaborated upon by any well-meaning thinkers, that serves the true goal of creating a moral individual who can discern right from wrong and true from false, with a firm identity, in accordance with the overall culture and wishes of their ancestors.
IQ tracking and personality tests (which already are scientifically valid, but we should work to improve dramatically. . .just look how successful eharmony was at quantifying what makes a good match for marriage, by relying on personality tests.), to replace college and credentialism. College is a waste of time and money. Aside from a few obscure roles, a living breathing teacher is not necessary to obtain knowledge. Lectures could simply be posted online, forums could chat online and a pool of students/instructors could answer whatever questions you currently had, and so on. Extremely bright people should not be wasting time or money getting a piece of paper saying what a simple IQ test could verify in 15 minutes -- I'm smart and should be given a good job with lots of responsibility. Charles Murray already proved in the bell curve that IQ was a better indicator of job productivity than a college degree in that field. It's time to close down this worthless racket, and in doing so, give men back the jobs they have lost to women, who are better at college but worse at the job itself.
Apprenticeships, years where businesses train their own employees at their own expense, will replace all current job training, college, and the like. If a business wants a good worker, it should have to make one. If a job really is extremely complex and requires years to learn, then people should be taught by actually being on the job, watching the people doing it, being guided through the steps, not in some classroom learning about it theoretically. Just as its easier to learn a language through submersion in the actual country it's spoken in than years of classroom teaching, it is easier to learn a job by doing, than by hearing about it in a classroom for years. Businesses will no longer have endless access to foreign labor, or H-1B visas, or whatever, and therefore if they want workers, they will have to invest in them. The citizen's dividend will also require people are paid a decent wage -- or they won't even bother working. Stuff it, fat cats. This would also solve all our unemployment problems.
In order to avoid the trap of endless debt, loans will no longer be issued to fund people's dreams or aspirations. If someone wants to found a business, a bank can offer to fund it in return for a % of the profits, just like the maritime ventures during the age of exploration. The same for all other capital expenditures. As far as consumption goes, people will have to rely on buying big ticket items with their citizen's dividend they've been saving up. Or their parent's citizen's dividend, or their rich uncle's citizen's dividend, etc. People will no longer consume more than they can afford, or use more money than our country actually has to offer.
There will no longer be inflation or funny money. The federal reserve is toast. All money will stand for some real product or value that our country has actually produced. As technology improves, prices should go down, not up, every year. Since there are no loans anymore, deflation would have no adverse affect on anyone, it would just quietly make everyone richer as time went by. Of course, if there isn't enough money to conduct business efficiently, we can always mint more. But it will be at our public discretion, not made by capitalists smoking cigars behind closed rooms.
Suitable entertainment and stories for such a society will be dredged up from our thousands of years of cultural history, new media supported by the government or private citizens will create new, suitable, and carefully supervised entertainment. The sewage pipe of Hollywood's influence that drowned America will not be allowed to re-appear. Mental Pollution will be considered just as important as physical pollution.
Have I left parts of the system out? No doubt. But the point is, everything has to be changed at once. There is no single problem afflicting the world today, it's a multitude of problems, arising out of a multitude of different groups. Corporations are robbing the proletariat blind. Immigrants are diversifying and fracturing our civic unity. Stupid people are outbreeding smart people. Crime is everywhere. Men can no longer find life partners, women are no longer having children. Morality has turned into a charade, where simply mouthing the right platitudes is more important than people's own behavior. Bureaucrats are paper pushing our tax dollars around but delivering no valuable service. Entertainment has become debased, and debases its audience in turn. Education is indoctrinating people into the wrong beliefs, and not providing any useful skills. Religion is hopelessly outdated and suitable only for superstitious cave men, not a technological society that requires science for everything we do. So on and so forth. There are problems everywhere -- but the proper system, the proper law code, can solve all of them simultaneously. With the right laws, we can form a righteous people and a righteous nation. It is possible to create a utopia, totalitarianism does work. We simply have to take into account human nature, and build our laws around this nature, instead of trying to violate it. Furthermore, by concentrating on eugenics (and later genetic engineering), we can shape our people into any mold we please, thus getting rid of the roadblock of human nature altogether. In a dozen generations we could have any sort of people we desired.
What's important is partially the innate power level of the people who form the nation, but desperately more so, their philosophical dedication to the cause. If the people simply stick to these laws, we will succeed. Just like Solon or Lycurgus, who handed down their laws to Athens and Sparta, with the strict condition that they must be obeyed and stuck to unchanged forever, gave those people a 500 year golden age, unrivaled by anything else on Earth at the time -- this law code, so long as it is revered and upkept, will make us the greatest people in history. Dedication to the cause, to the laws, to the culture, to the nation, to the chain of being that is ancestors, the present, and descendants all united in one single body for one great purpose -- this is our true strength. By it we succeed or fail, everything else can be provided by the law, even our intelligence, even our personalities, can be raised by successful application of the law -- but dedication to the law must come of our own free wills first. What we need is a nation of true believers, not of slaves or oppressed folk or conscripts. With true believers, anything is possible. So for now, we delineate this new vision, this new clean slate we are replacing everything with, and recruit the true believers we need. There are enough desperately miserable people on earth, enough people driven to the brink by what is happening in this world, that there should always be converts willing to listen to our dreams. When we're strong enough, we implement it -- and the new history of a new people, with a new philosophy, with a new law code, with a new everything, will begin.
Better than everything that came before. Better than anyone who came before. The hope of the universe.
Monday, September 14, 2009
Green Shoots? Yeah Right.
There is nothing more amazing than optimism. It stuns me every time I see it. It is unfathomable, unbelievable, every time it crosses a human face. And yet there it is, eternally shining, eternally mouthing the same old lines: "Tomorrow is another day!"
What is there to be so happy about? What is there to be hopeful about? There are a few good developments in computers and some other arcane fields of science. Stem cells, super colliders, carbon nanotubes, and all that jazz. Even here, it's a far cry from the pace of invention we used to sustain. Aside from the internet in 1990 and the computer in 1970 or so, we haven't done anything important in ages. Our space program was more developed in the 1960's than it is today -- at least back then we were regularly journeying to the moon and back. The car was invented in 1900. Genetically modified crops have only allowed a population boom which has ultimately made us worse off. The Refrigerator, Telephone, Telegram, railroads (that used to run much faster than the ones we use today!), the light bulb, everything was invented in the 1800's. Even antibiotics were discovered early in the 20th century -- ever since then we've been fighting a losing battle as the diseases evolve to be immune to them all. My point being, the standard of living and the material possessions we are surrounded with, are not largely different from a man of 1900! Meanwhile, by several other measures, we have declined ferociously.
IQ has gone down this entire century. Don't bother me with the wretched flynn effect. There's no way in hell joe schmoe of today is 20 IQ points smarter than the average newspaper reader of the 1700's was (read the political arguments going on in those days, that all adults were expected to keep up with, like Thomas Paine's Common Sense or the Federalist Papers); There is no way in hell Diane Feinstein is 20 IQ points smarter than Thomas Jefferson, the stamp of man who used to belong to our government. Go back into the past and you see towering geniuses everywhere, inventing, discovering, debating, creating, on a level no one of the 21st century hopes to approach. You also see a better mannered, better educated, better dressed, better behaved lower and middle class, than anything we have today. By no possible measure are we smarter than our forebears, except by the wretched Flynn effect continuously trotted out to defy human biodiversity.
Furthermore, it is only natural that when a High IQ population like whites goes from 30% of world population, to 10% of world population, smaller now than even the number of blacks (read, monkey-men) in the world, that worldwide IQ has dropped precipitously since 1900. It is only getting worse. All the population projections have us continuing to collapse, alongside our East Asian brethren who also refuse to breed, and prolific races like Arabs, Africans, and Hispanics continuously expanding into the breach. How can there be hope for a world that has lost all its smartest members? Not only between races, but within races, the smartest people have the fewest children, the dumbest people have the most children. The formula is a total disaster, and no one is doing anything to stop it. Intelligence is being bred out of the human genome. We are devolving to fit current circumstances, an environment that rewards liars, thieves, and beggars above all others. Just as the cuckoo bird, the mosquito, and the cockroach have all found successful niches in the game of life, the human being is evolving into a parasitic species, one that succeeds only upon the backs of their victims, and never accomplishes anything for itself. Since no one is stopping them, why shouldn't they continue to do so? There are no rules in the game of life, only war -- just as the animal kingdom has its parasites, humanity also has the potential for parasitism. If the environment rewards such behavior with higher birth rates and financial success, that is what humanity will become. There is no stopping mother nature! And don't think this is some sort of long term process that isn't important. In just three or four generations, Russian scientists had completely changed the nature of the foxes they bred. Under heavy enough selective pressures, evolution can occur in an eyeblink. Today we are under these heavy selective pressures --
More people are 'dying' off today (by not having children) than during the Black Plague. How many generations do you think it took to evolve a resistance against the Black Plague, considering you died if you didn't have it? Yeah, that's right, probably less than four. Now consider this: If this enormous die-off goes on for three or four generations (let's start the clock at 1960, after the baby boom), do you think humans won't have evolved just as radically, just as much? Or think about it like this -- there might well be 100 year olds sitting around who are just like humanity used to be -- independent, intelligent, well mannered, proud. At the same time, 5 additional generations have already been born and raised, each of them suffering a severe cutback on the same scale as the black plague, every single one of them under heavy selective pressure to be a liar, a thief, and a beggar -- every single one of them under heavy selective pressure to be unintelligent -- because intelligence is the kiss of death -- because intelligent women no longer have 'time' for the whole messy business of reproduction, and getting that new fancy car or pearl necklace (because I deserve it!) absolutely has to come first.
Do you really think that mankind can withstand that kind of selective pressure? On one side, rewarding liars (machiavellian insurance agents, bankers, speculators, advertisers, politicians, lobbyists, lawyers), thieves (criminals and voters who vote for socialist handouts), and beggars (refugees, welfare recipients, beneficiaries of charity and technology they did not invent and could not maintain without outside help.), with enormous population booms the like of which the world has never seen: Going from the 2 billion population of 1950 to the 7 billion of today -- an almost four fold increase. And on the other hand - ! Oh God, the horrible reality of the other hand -- ! The few decent, honorable, intelligent, productive classes, having on average 1 child per two parents, for five generations in a row, such that at the beginning there were 32 great-great-great-grandparents, there is now only one child.
Let's repeat this! World population has quadrupled. The population of smart, honest, good newborns is now 1/32 of what it used to be. The proportion of smart people to dumb people on earth, then, is 1/128th what it used to be. That evolutionary pressure is the severest one can possibly imagine, it is completely changing the nature of mankind. The good people of the world have been stricken low by nothing short of a nuclear holocaust, the near complete annihilation of their existence. Meanwhile the termites, frogs, and pond scum, have quadrupled, spreading like some oil spill into the depths and breadth of the gene pool.
WE HAVE NOTHING TO BE HAPPY ABOUT.
Conservatives are bragging about their million man march on Washington D.C. Let it be ten million! Do you honestly think the democrats will ever lose another election, once amnesty is passed? Do you really think blacks and mexicans, jews and asians, women and gays, won't march in the hundreds of millions to the polls come 2012, and vote in another socialist just like they did this election? What is a million people in the USA???? If those million people had signed my petition and agreed to fight their way into a new future, then yes, it would mean something. But a million cowards who want to wave signs around before bowing to the 'legitimate rule' of democracy and communism, don't mean a damn thing. McCain got well over a million votes -- who fucking gives a damn if a million people make a peaceful demonstration that yes, they are still McCain supporters????? Because that is all the 'conservative right' has to offer. More and more of the same garbage! The same liberal horse-shit they pretend to oppose! Republicans have been president for the majority of 1950 to today. During that time, has a single social program been repealed? Have we gained any freedom? Is our tax burden any lighter? Of course not. We have more regulations, higher taxes, and a debt of 70 trillion dollars we can never, ever repay. THANKS REPUBLICANS. Let's have a great tea party and get another Republican back in office, who will save us from the evil democrats! Don't make me laugh, don't make me CHOKE on this LIE, this FARCE, that is the two party system!
Republicans dream that they can somehow spike the health care bill. First off, they can't. The democrats have complete control of Congress and the Presidency. But let's ignore that. Why don't we just focus on the fact that health prices have risen, skyrocketed, beyond all imagination, since 1950. At the same time, the health of Americans has plummeted since 1950. What did they think would happen? First off, we've imported and bred nothing but morons for half a century, all of whom don't take care of themselves. Obesity, fetal alcohol syndrome, AIDS, diabetes, all of this is weighing our medical system down, and all of it is largely found among minorities. Second, our mental health has gone so far down, that practically half the country is designated insane and in need of happy pills! Let me repeat, in 1900, when heroin, opium, and all the rest was legal, there were only 100,000 drug users in America. Now around 40% of the population uses drugs, even though we have fought a 'War on Drugs' for two decades and have sentencing penalties higher than for murderers. Now add in Prozac, Ritalin, and all the rest of our happy pills -- ! I'm sure we're getting near 100% at this rate, a nation-wide insane asylum with everyone taking their pills to avoid complete mental breakdowns every day. Oh yes, happy days are here again. The best proof that the good times are truly rolling, is that everyone has to be on medication just to wake up in the morning or go to sleep at night. All of this while health care fetches a higher and higher share of people's budgets. It's practically 20% of the entire economy -- but has it cured any of us? Are any of us healthier than we used to be? Of course not. You cannot destroy the family, you cannot destroy all healthy beliefs and ideals, you cannot flood our country with unhealthy idiots, and improve our health -- physical or mental.
How's this for health care reform? Abort all babies with genetic diseases. Return to the model of the nuclear family. Keep a mother at home to love and cherish her children, so they grow up emotionally healthy. Marry at an early age, before betrayals loneliness and lies have shredded every heart into black nihilist despair, and then have children and love them just like you were loved as children by your parents. Improve the IQ of the population through self-selecting migration followed by matching birth rates of individuals to their high or low IQ. Let old people die of old age and don't drag on their lives indefinitely -- teach people that death is nothing because our blood and our work continues as one collective beating heart that will never fade, that will inherit the stars thanks to the work we do today. In that way, all the modern causes of poor health -- obesity, smoking, STD's, alcohol, drugs, gunshot wounds, all of it would disappear. In its place would be a healthy people who never needed any health care. We could lower the price of health care to 1% of GDP or something, and everyone could afford it easily. But there is no program on earth, however you juggle the numbers, that can fund the health of a suicidal people. A country that gathers up a giant bonfire and then sets itself aflame, is trying to hire firefighters to come put the fire out, all the while heaping on more fuel, more gasoline, more matches and burning themselves at a frenzied pace. It's an unimaginable sight, straight from Dante's Inferno -- pure madness!
Unemployment is 'leveling off,' they say. Well that's great, that's just dandy. Unemployment can now stay leveled off at 20% or so, what a fine number to level off at. No one is going to get hired, because, let's be honest, we haven't created any new jobs in something like 20 years. The only jobs these days come from government, who hires people to take money from other people and give it to other people, while taking a cut for themselves in this organized thievery. A REAL JOB that actually PRODUCES SOMETHING -- when's the last time such a job was created in America? We have lost millions of jobs in manufacturing. Farming requires massive subsidies to even stay afloat. Here is how bad it's gotten -- women are now a larger percentage of the workforce than men. Does this mean women are more productive than men? Well, no. It just means that men can no longer find any real jobs, while women are still quite handily finding fake jobs -- teachers that don't teach anything in public schools, bureaucrats who steal our money for 'our own good,' luxury goods designers like clothes and cosmetics no one needs, clerks who smile to their customers and waitresses who serve their tables earning minimum wage.
Meanwhile a few sharks at the top earn, on average, $700,000 a year. These bankers and brokers and financial analysts and what have you, who just lost our country 12 trillion dollars -- are earning $700,000 a year for having done so. That's right. If you hold up a store and steal a hundred dollars, America throws you in jail for five years. But if you hold up the American taxpayer for 12 trillion dollars, we tell them a job well done and hand them a $700,000 bonus on the side. The most blatant theft in history has higher rewards in a year than anything a humble American can ever hope to earn, in his entire life. What is the point of working in the face of such a disheartening fact? What is the point in effort, or production, or anything, when staring at these fat cat's paychecks? Rather than work, why don't we just drag every single rich person out of their homes, shoot them, and take their money? It could support the rest of us for the rest of our lives. It would also be the first gleam of justice in the last fifty years for the American worker.
Let's talk about immigration. The BNP has won 2 seats. Immigration is down with the lower economy in the USA. Whee! Let's all cheer! Oh wait, in both the UK and the USA, over 50% of children born are non-white. That means IMMIGRATION DOESN'T MEAN JACK SHIT ANYMORE. The immigration debate is over, it's now utterly meaningless. Whether a billion new immigrants flood into our countries, or we shut the door and don't let a single one in, we are already doomed to become extinct in our own homelands. So how about we NOT talk about immigration, since the whole debate is now pointless, meaningless puffery? There is only one debate left concerning immigrants -- either you support A) mass deportations, B) secession, C) wholesale liquidations, D) The extinction of all whites worldwide. While we've been debating immigration this year, a million new immigrants entered the USA, another million entered Europe. The debate is over, we lost. It is too late to curtail immigration anymore, the dam is burst and the waters are flooding in, unchecked, unstopped, unrestricted by anyone or anything. The future is hopeless. All the sites like Vdare, Amren, FAIR, NumbersUSA, all of them are whistling past the graveyard. They pretend like all we have to do is stop non-white immigration and everything will be fine. When in fact they all know, just like I do, just like the liberals know, that we will be a non-white majority either way, and the only difference will be a decade forward or back now. And all these cowards, afraid of upsetting their audience, afraid of telling the truth, afraid of endorsing the only actions that could truly save our people, endlessly whine to the wind, getting nowhere. Like a flywheel connected to nothing, the hamsters just spin and spin inside. Maybe they're right. Maybe no one will support measures A, B, or C. But in that case they should just give up and endorse D like everyone else has. Because if we don't support A, B, or C, then we're just as doomed, no matter what else we say or do.
The stock market is up? From what? It used to be at 14,000. Now it's at 9,500. Taking into account inflation, do such numbers even mean anything? The dollar today is worth 4 cents of the 1913 dollar. So the Dow Jones was at 80 in 1913, which equates to 2,000 in today's dollars. But wait -- we're forgetting population! Naturally the stock market's size should increase as the population of America increases. The population was 97 million people then, so let's just round to 100 million. Today it's around 307 million. So let's just round to 300 million. So, the stock market should naturally be three times as high as it was in 1913. So now we're up to 6,000 in today's dollars, per capita. That's right, in real terms, our stock market is one third larger than it was in 1913. A great recovery from March 2008, where the stock market was at 6,547. That's right, at a certain point in this depression, we had actually managed to lower our economy to the SAME LEVEL OF WEALTH AS 1913 AMERICA. After all the financial gimmicks and lying wizardry is done, the American people are no richer than we were in 1913, per capita, or barely richer than we were then. Meanwhile, we have become tens of times more productive in terms of $ per hour worked. We have completely industrialized our economy, gone from a sleepy rural life to a world leading powerhouse, the richest country on Earth, etc -- and yet after all that, where has the money gone? It has been criminally frittered away, wasted, destroyed, and stolen by both our parasitic elites and parasitic underclass. The value of the United States is no higher, despite all of the inventions and all of the productivity gains and all of the oil we've burnt and all the computers we use and everything, because of the saboteurs, the sharks in our midst!
Now instead of being vastly wealthy on the backs of our vast natural resources and machine powered labor and computerized information processing -- we are 70 trillion dollars in debt. I wonder how indebted America was in 1913? I bet their financial prospects were a bit better than ours! Apparently 2 billion dollars (is that inflation adjusted? Who knows, so let's say it was 50 billion dollars, inflation adjusted, and 150 billion dollars, population adjusted.) 150 billion dollars, whew! That's a bit less than 70 trillion. Lucky them. As far as I'm concerned the economy was healthier back then -- they had a brighter future than we do.
The economy will not recover, it's obvious why it CANNOT recover. Demographics is destiny. If we are going to be a third world people, we will have a third world economy. If blacks and hispanics are going to turn America into a giant Los Angeles, then we'll be as bankrupt as California. There cannot be a more obvious, more stark, more apparent truth than the ghost town of Detroit. That's our future, it's the only future America can have, because that is the race that has supplanted us. We who sailed the oceans, tamed the lightning bolt and landed on the moon. Disgusting.
But even supposing other races could be as intelligent and productive as ourselves, the economy has never prospered anyway. So long as 99% of our wealth is wasted on unproductive work and parasites, on meaningless wars, health care for people Nature meant to die of old age, welfare moms with 30 kids and zero dads, 300 pairs of shoes per woman, interest on all of our debts, giant fat bonuses for bankers and lawyers who have made a career out of legalized theft -- it's not like the economy could ever prosper anyway. Like any terminally ill patient, it's obvious that the virus has overcome our immune system, is rapidly reproducing, outnumbers all of our still healthy blood cells, t cells, and lymphocytes, and is tearing away at our last reserves of vitality even as we speak.
Productive workers have long been outnumbered, outgunned, and overpowered by the evil liars and thieves around them. Despite heroic advances in technology, despite heroic advances in world trade, despite heroic advancements in infrastructure, the number of liars, beggars, and thieves has bankrupted us anyway. Their rapaciousness far outstrips our innovation, it is a black hole and we are already inside the event horizon.
Illegitimacy rates used to be around 3% Now they're around 50% in Europe, 40% in the USA. The numbers climb every year. In a couple generations, there will be no such thing as marriage. It is impossible in a climate where women make more money than men, where alpha males monopolize all the breeding stock, where adultery and serial polygamy are glamorized as high status and desirable in all the media. There are no green shoots here. Every year is more dismal than the last. Around the world, hundreds of millions of men are left single with no hope of ever having a family. Psychologically unsuited to compete with the gang-bangers and bar room bikers who inhabit the lower classes and reproduce like rabbits, but through intellectual or emotional impairment, also incapable of seizing that 'top 10%' niche where men become glamorous and sexy again with the infinite wealth and status high class girls dream about. These men have nothing to look forward to in life, nothing. Whether they are in China (where men outnumber women by hundreds of millions), Japan (where the average age of a woman marrying is now 30), Europe (50% illegitimacy rate) or the USA (50% divorce rate), it's all over. The men of 1900 could pretty well be assured of having a wife and two kids. Even if they had a small house, or no house at all. Even if they died young in the railroads or the coal mines. They could get out of school, and expect to shortly have an arm around their wife's waist, and a baby bouncing on their knee. (God, it hurts just imagining that kind of happiness, and yet to them it would have sounded like nothing special at all!) That was the birthright of our ancestors. Today. . .nothing. We can expect nothing. If we don't fit into the 'top 10%' or the 'bottom feeding pond scum' demographic section, we can expect to never marry, never have children, and just die. Just hurry up and die -- that's all our women want from us, that's all they're going to want from us, so long as this culture is maintained.
There's no hope in other directions as well. For instance, evolution was discovered by Charles Darwin in 1860, Capitalism was invented by Adam Smith in 1776 or so. Even though both have been scientifically proven beyond all doubt, today there are as few adherents to either as ever! Instead 50% of America are still mind-numbingly stupid creationists. Instead socialism, which has failed over and over and over again, is in power all over the globe. In 1800, most of the world was still ruled by an aristocracy, a constitutional monarch, or some other elite that lived by a code of honor and tradition. Today we are all mobocracys, voting by the lowest common denominator, ruled by idiots instead of geniuses. And while Michelangelo was being funded by the government of Florence in the 1500's, and Shakespeare hosted by Queen Elizabeth in the 1600's, today entertainers cater to the crowd -- and their entertainment is just as stupid, low, and crass as the crowd they entertain. Brittney Spears. Michael Jackson. You get the idea.
Artistically, we have regressed. Ideologically, we have become relativists and nihilists, where before we were the philosophers of the Enlightenment. Where race realism was apparent to every last man on the street, now barely 1% dare to breathe its name. Where sodomy was reviled everywhere, now we allow gays to marry and adopt children. Everything is going backwards, regressing, just like the genetics of our people. Regressing further and further backwards, into the new dark ages. Even machines cannot save us from ourselves and our poisoned, awful beliefs. Our decline is visible all around us. The Empire State Building was built in a year. It was built in 1930. The 'Freedom Tower' hasn't built a single floor in 8 years. It has all the modern technology and materials of 2009 to work with. It has a population three times as large to hire from. It has everything, the vast resources of the entire United States of America -- and it cannot build a damn first floor in eight years. Does this sound like an upward moving nation? Does this sing of progress? Is this cause for optimism? For hope?
In 1900 we were writing about journeys to the moon and the center of the earth. In 2009 we write about vampires sucking each other's blood. Is this cause for hope?
Let's face it. There are no green shoots. Nothing is going right. We aren't making any progress. We have no cause for optimism.
There are ways to improve our situation, but they narrow down to two basic acts: A technological singularity that replaces mankind, or a violent revolution that founds a new nation for a new, carefully selected and carefully bred and carefully led people. We can hope for one or the other, and nothing else. Our energy should be dedicated to one or the other, and nothing else. We should argue for one or the other, and nothing else. We should endorse one or the other, and nothing else. The flakey conservatives who crow over one meaningless victory or another, one hopeful sign or another, are just the opium of the malcontents. A safety valve. While taking pride in delaying the health care bill, or winning another meaningless election, or defeating the Iraqi insurgents, or whatever, the inexorable trends keep closing in, and the water keeps rising and rising over our heads. It is as senseless to believe in a conservative victory today, as to imagine the battle of the bulge was the great turning of the tides and the Nazis would win WWII from here out. By God, I have the deepest respect for the people who fought the Battle of Berlin, with no hope at all in their breasts, blaring out the Gotterdamerung over their radios, instead of any further military orders! Those people are feasting in Valhalla. But the German who died thinking they were just about to turn the tide, who thought the Battle of the Bulge, or Kursk, or some other meaningless short victory, was a 'green shoot' leading towards the promised land -- you pitiable poor deluded souls!
Let's not charm ourselves with will o' the wisps of false hopes. Let's not weaken ourselves with siren songs of empty prospects. It is beneath us. Reality is grim, we must be even grimmer. The world is harsh, we must be even harsher. That is the only path out of our nightmare.
What is there to be so happy about? What is there to be hopeful about? There are a few good developments in computers and some other arcane fields of science. Stem cells, super colliders, carbon nanotubes, and all that jazz. Even here, it's a far cry from the pace of invention we used to sustain. Aside from the internet in 1990 and the computer in 1970 or so, we haven't done anything important in ages. Our space program was more developed in the 1960's than it is today -- at least back then we were regularly journeying to the moon and back. The car was invented in 1900. Genetically modified crops have only allowed a population boom which has ultimately made us worse off. The Refrigerator, Telephone, Telegram, railroads (that used to run much faster than the ones we use today!), the light bulb, everything was invented in the 1800's. Even antibiotics were discovered early in the 20th century -- ever since then we've been fighting a losing battle as the diseases evolve to be immune to them all. My point being, the standard of living and the material possessions we are surrounded with, are not largely different from a man of 1900! Meanwhile, by several other measures, we have declined ferociously.
IQ has gone down this entire century. Don't bother me with the wretched flynn effect. There's no way in hell joe schmoe of today is 20 IQ points smarter than the average newspaper reader of the 1700's was (read the political arguments going on in those days, that all adults were expected to keep up with, like Thomas Paine's Common Sense or the Federalist Papers); There is no way in hell Diane Feinstein is 20 IQ points smarter than Thomas Jefferson, the stamp of man who used to belong to our government. Go back into the past and you see towering geniuses everywhere, inventing, discovering, debating, creating, on a level no one of the 21st century hopes to approach. You also see a better mannered, better educated, better dressed, better behaved lower and middle class, than anything we have today. By no possible measure are we smarter than our forebears, except by the wretched Flynn effect continuously trotted out to defy human biodiversity.
Furthermore, it is only natural that when a High IQ population like whites goes from 30% of world population, to 10% of world population, smaller now than even the number of blacks (read, monkey-men) in the world, that worldwide IQ has dropped precipitously since 1900. It is only getting worse. All the population projections have us continuing to collapse, alongside our East Asian brethren who also refuse to breed, and prolific races like Arabs, Africans, and Hispanics continuously expanding into the breach. How can there be hope for a world that has lost all its smartest members? Not only between races, but within races, the smartest people have the fewest children, the dumbest people have the most children. The formula is a total disaster, and no one is doing anything to stop it. Intelligence is being bred out of the human genome. We are devolving to fit current circumstances, an environment that rewards liars, thieves, and beggars above all others. Just as the cuckoo bird, the mosquito, and the cockroach have all found successful niches in the game of life, the human being is evolving into a parasitic species, one that succeeds only upon the backs of their victims, and never accomplishes anything for itself. Since no one is stopping them, why shouldn't they continue to do so? There are no rules in the game of life, only war -- just as the animal kingdom has its parasites, humanity also has the potential for parasitism. If the environment rewards such behavior with higher birth rates and financial success, that is what humanity will become. There is no stopping mother nature! And don't think this is some sort of long term process that isn't important. In just three or four generations, Russian scientists had completely changed the nature of the foxes they bred. Under heavy enough selective pressures, evolution can occur in an eyeblink. Today we are under these heavy selective pressures --
More people are 'dying' off today (by not having children) than during the Black Plague. How many generations do you think it took to evolve a resistance against the Black Plague, considering you died if you didn't have it? Yeah, that's right, probably less than four. Now consider this: If this enormous die-off goes on for three or four generations (let's start the clock at 1960, after the baby boom), do you think humans won't have evolved just as radically, just as much? Or think about it like this -- there might well be 100 year olds sitting around who are just like humanity used to be -- independent, intelligent, well mannered, proud. At the same time, 5 additional generations have already been born and raised, each of them suffering a severe cutback on the same scale as the black plague, every single one of them under heavy selective pressure to be a liar, a thief, and a beggar -- every single one of them under heavy selective pressure to be unintelligent -- because intelligence is the kiss of death -- because intelligent women no longer have 'time' for the whole messy business of reproduction, and getting that new fancy car or pearl necklace (because I deserve it!) absolutely has to come first.
Do you really think that mankind can withstand that kind of selective pressure? On one side, rewarding liars (machiavellian insurance agents, bankers, speculators, advertisers, politicians, lobbyists, lawyers), thieves (criminals and voters who vote for socialist handouts), and beggars (refugees, welfare recipients, beneficiaries of charity and technology they did not invent and could not maintain without outside help.), with enormous population booms the like of which the world has never seen: Going from the 2 billion population of 1950 to the 7 billion of today -- an almost four fold increase. And on the other hand - ! Oh God, the horrible reality of the other hand -- ! The few decent, honorable, intelligent, productive classes, having on average 1 child per two parents, for five generations in a row, such that at the beginning there were 32 great-great-great-grandparents, there is now only one child.
Let's repeat this! World population has quadrupled. The population of smart, honest, good newborns is now 1/32 of what it used to be. The proportion of smart people to dumb people on earth, then, is 1/128th what it used to be. That evolutionary pressure is the severest one can possibly imagine, it is completely changing the nature of mankind. The good people of the world have been stricken low by nothing short of a nuclear holocaust, the near complete annihilation of their existence. Meanwhile the termites, frogs, and pond scum, have quadrupled, spreading like some oil spill into the depths and breadth of the gene pool.
WE HAVE NOTHING TO BE HAPPY ABOUT.
Conservatives are bragging about their million man march on Washington D.C. Let it be ten million! Do you honestly think the democrats will ever lose another election, once amnesty is passed? Do you really think blacks and mexicans, jews and asians, women and gays, won't march in the hundreds of millions to the polls come 2012, and vote in another socialist just like they did this election? What is a million people in the USA???? If those million people had signed my petition and agreed to fight their way into a new future, then yes, it would mean something. But a million cowards who want to wave signs around before bowing to the 'legitimate rule' of democracy and communism, don't mean a damn thing. McCain got well over a million votes -- who fucking gives a damn if a million people make a peaceful demonstration that yes, they are still McCain supporters????? Because that is all the 'conservative right' has to offer. More and more of the same garbage! The same liberal horse-shit they pretend to oppose! Republicans have been president for the majority of 1950 to today. During that time, has a single social program been repealed? Have we gained any freedom? Is our tax burden any lighter? Of course not. We have more regulations, higher taxes, and a debt of 70 trillion dollars we can never, ever repay. THANKS REPUBLICANS. Let's have a great tea party and get another Republican back in office, who will save us from the evil democrats! Don't make me laugh, don't make me CHOKE on this LIE, this FARCE, that is the two party system!
Republicans dream that they can somehow spike the health care bill. First off, they can't. The democrats have complete control of Congress and the Presidency. But let's ignore that. Why don't we just focus on the fact that health prices have risen, skyrocketed, beyond all imagination, since 1950. At the same time, the health of Americans has plummeted since 1950. What did they think would happen? First off, we've imported and bred nothing but morons for half a century, all of whom don't take care of themselves. Obesity, fetal alcohol syndrome, AIDS, diabetes, all of this is weighing our medical system down, and all of it is largely found among minorities. Second, our mental health has gone so far down, that practically half the country is designated insane and in need of happy pills! Let me repeat, in 1900, when heroin, opium, and all the rest was legal, there were only 100,000 drug users in America. Now around 40% of the population uses drugs, even though we have fought a 'War on Drugs' for two decades and have sentencing penalties higher than for murderers. Now add in Prozac, Ritalin, and all the rest of our happy pills -- ! I'm sure we're getting near 100% at this rate, a nation-wide insane asylum with everyone taking their pills to avoid complete mental breakdowns every day. Oh yes, happy days are here again. The best proof that the good times are truly rolling, is that everyone has to be on medication just to wake up in the morning or go to sleep at night. All of this while health care fetches a higher and higher share of people's budgets. It's practically 20% of the entire economy -- but has it cured any of us? Are any of us healthier than we used to be? Of course not. You cannot destroy the family, you cannot destroy all healthy beliefs and ideals, you cannot flood our country with unhealthy idiots, and improve our health -- physical or mental.
How's this for health care reform? Abort all babies with genetic diseases. Return to the model of the nuclear family. Keep a mother at home to love and cherish her children, so they grow up emotionally healthy. Marry at an early age, before betrayals loneliness and lies have shredded every heart into black nihilist despair, and then have children and love them just like you were loved as children by your parents. Improve the IQ of the population through self-selecting migration followed by matching birth rates of individuals to their high or low IQ. Let old people die of old age and don't drag on their lives indefinitely -- teach people that death is nothing because our blood and our work continues as one collective beating heart that will never fade, that will inherit the stars thanks to the work we do today. In that way, all the modern causes of poor health -- obesity, smoking, STD's, alcohol, drugs, gunshot wounds, all of it would disappear. In its place would be a healthy people who never needed any health care. We could lower the price of health care to 1% of GDP or something, and everyone could afford it easily. But there is no program on earth, however you juggle the numbers, that can fund the health of a suicidal people. A country that gathers up a giant bonfire and then sets itself aflame, is trying to hire firefighters to come put the fire out, all the while heaping on more fuel, more gasoline, more matches and burning themselves at a frenzied pace. It's an unimaginable sight, straight from Dante's Inferno -- pure madness!
Unemployment is 'leveling off,' they say. Well that's great, that's just dandy. Unemployment can now stay leveled off at 20% or so, what a fine number to level off at. No one is going to get hired, because, let's be honest, we haven't created any new jobs in something like 20 years. The only jobs these days come from government, who hires people to take money from other people and give it to other people, while taking a cut for themselves in this organized thievery. A REAL JOB that actually PRODUCES SOMETHING -- when's the last time such a job was created in America? We have lost millions of jobs in manufacturing. Farming requires massive subsidies to even stay afloat. Here is how bad it's gotten -- women are now a larger percentage of the workforce than men. Does this mean women are more productive than men? Well, no. It just means that men can no longer find any real jobs, while women are still quite handily finding fake jobs -- teachers that don't teach anything in public schools, bureaucrats who steal our money for 'our own good,' luxury goods designers like clothes and cosmetics no one needs, clerks who smile to their customers and waitresses who serve their tables earning minimum wage.
Meanwhile a few sharks at the top earn, on average, $700,000 a year. These bankers and brokers and financial analysts and what have you, who just lost our country 12 trillion dollars -- are earning $700,000 a year for having done so. That's right. If you hold up a store and steal a hundred dollars, America throws you in jail for five years. But if you hold up the American taxpayer for 12 trillion dollars, we tell them a job well done and hand them a $700,000 bonus on the side. The most blatant theft in history has higher rewards in a year than anything a humble American can ever hope to earn, in his entire life. What is the point of working in the face of such a disheartening fact? What is the point in effort, or production, or anything, when staring at these fat cat's paychecks? Rather than work, why don't we just drag every single rich person out of their homes, shoot them, and take their money? It could support the rest of us for the rest of our lives. It would also be the first gleam of justice in the last fifty years for the American worker.
Let's talk about immigration. The BNP has won 2 seats. Immigration is down with the lower economy in the USA. Whee! Let's all cheer! Oh wait, in both the UK and the USA, over 50% of children born are non-white. That means IMMIGRATION DOESN'T MEAN JACK SHIT ANYMORE. The immigration debate is over, it's now utterly meaningless. Whether a billion new immigrants flood into our countries, or we shut the door and don't let a single one in, we are already doomed to become extinct in our own homelands. So how about we NOT talk about immigration, since the whole debate is now pointless, meaningless puffery? There is only one debate left concerning immigrants -- either you support A) mass deportations, B) secession, C) wholesale liquidations, D) The extinction of all whites worldwide. While we've been debating immigration this year, a million new immigrants entered the USA, another million entered Europe. The debate is over, we lost. It is too late to curtail immigration anymore, the dam is burst and the waters are flooding in, unchecked, unstopped, unrestricted by anyone or anything. The future is hopeless. All the sites like Vdare, Amren, FAIR, NumbersUSA, all of them are whistling past the graveyard. They pretend like all we have to do is stop non-white immigration and everything will be fine. When in fact they all know, just like I do, just like the liberals know, that we will be a non-white majority either way, and the only difference will be a decade forward or back now. And all these cowards, afraid of upsetting their audience, afraid of telling the truth, afraid of endorsing the only actions that could truly save our people, endlessly whine to the wind, getting nowhere. Like a flywheel connected to nothing, the hamsters just spin and spin inside. Maybe they're right. Maybe no one will support measures A, B, or C. But in that case they should just give up and endorse D like everyone else has. Because if we don't support A, B, or C, then we're just as doomed, no matter what else we say or do.
The stock market is up? From what? It used to be at 14,000. Now it's at 9,500. Taking into account inflation, do such numbers even mean anything? The dollar today is worth 4 cents of the 1913 dollar. So the Dow Jones was at 80 in 1913, which equates to 2,000 in today's dollars. But wait -- we're forgetting population! Naturally the stock market's size should increase as the population of America increases. The population was 97 million people then, so let's just round to 100 million. Today it's around 307 million. So let's just round to 300 million. So, the stock market should naturally be three times as high as it was in 1913. So now we're up to 6,000 in today's dollars, per capita. That's right, in real terms, our stock market is one third larger than it was in 1913. A great recovery from March 2008, where the stock market was at 6,547. That's right, at a certain point in this depression, we had actually managed to lower our economy to the SAME LEVEL OF WEALTH AS 1913 AMERICA. After all the financial gimmicks and lying wizardry is done, the American people are no richer than we were in 1913, per capita, or barely richer than we were then. Meanwhile, we have become tens of times more productive in terms of $ per hour worked. We have completely industrialized our economy, gone from a sleepy rural life to a world leading powerhouse, the richest country on Earth, etc -- and yet after all that, where has the money gone? It has been criminally frittered away, wasted, destroyed, and stolen by both our parasitic elites and parasitic underclass. The value of the United States is no higher, despite all of the inventions and all of the productivity gains and all of the oil we've burnt and all the computers we use and everything, because of the saboteurs, the sharks in our midst!
Now instead of being vastly wealthy on the backs of our vast natural resources and machine powered labor and computerized information processing -- we are 70 trillion dollars in debt. I wonder how indebted America was in 1913? I bet their financial prospects were a bit better than ours! Apparently 2 billion dollars (is that inflation adjusted? Who knows, so let's say it was 50 billion dollars, inflation adjusted, and 150 billion dollars, population adjusted.) 150 billion dollars, whew! That's a bit less than 70 trillion. Lucky them. As far as I'm concerned the economy was healthier back then -- they had a brighter future than we do.
The economy will not recover, it's obvious why it CANNOT recover. Demographics is destiny. If we are going to be a third world people, we will have a third world economy. If blacks and hispanics are going to turn America into a giant Los Angeles, then we'll be as bankrupt as California. There cannot be a more obvious, more stark, more apparent truth than the ghost town of Detroit. That's our future, it's the only future America can have, because that is the race that has supplanted us. We who sailed the oceans, tamed the lightning bolt and landed on the moon. Disgusting.
But even supposing other races could be as intelligent and productive as ourselves, the economy has never prospered anyway. So long as 99% of our wealth is wasted on unproductive work and parasites, on meaningless wars, health care for people Nature meant to die of old age, welfare moms with 30 kids and zero dads, 300 pairs of shoes per woman, interest on all of our debts, giant fat bonuses for bankers and lawyers who have made a career out of legalized theft -- it's not like the economy could ever prosper anyway. Like any terminally ill patient, it's obvious that the virus has overcome our immune system, is rapidly reproducing, outnumbers all of our still healthy blood cells, t cells, and lymphocytes, and is tearing away at our last reserves of vitality even as we speak.
Productive workers have long been outnumbered, outgunned, and overpowered by the evil liars and thieves around them. Despite heroic advances in technology, despite heroic advances in world trade, despite heroic advancements in infrastructure, the number of liars, beggars, and thieves has bankrupted us anyway. Their rapaciousness far outstrips our innovation, it is a black hole and we are already inside the event horizon.
Illegitimacy rates used to be around 3% Now they're around 50% in Europe, 40% in the USA. The numbers climb every year. In a couple generations, there will be no such thing as marriage. It is impossible in a climate where women make more money than men, where alpha males monopolize all the breeding stock, where adultery and serial polygamy are glamorized as high status and desirable in all the media. There are no green shoots here. Every year is more dismal than the last. Around the world, hundreds of millions of men are left single with no hope of ever having a family. Psychologically unsuited to compete with the gang-bangers and bar room bikers who inhabit the lower classes and reproduce like rabbits, but through intellectual or emotional impairment, also incapable of seizing that 'top 10%' niche where men become glamorous and sexy again with the infinite wealth and status high class girls dream about. These men have nothing to look forward to in life, nothing. Whether they are in China (where men outnumber women by hundreds of millions), Japan (where the average age of a woman marrying is now 30), Europe (50% illegitimacy rate) or the USA (50% divorce rate), it's all over. The men of 1900 could pretty well be assured of having a wife and two kids. Even if they had a small house, or no house at all. Even if they died young in the railroads or the coal mines. They could get out of school, and expect to shortly have an arm around their wife's waist, and a baby bouncing on their knee. (God, it hurts just imagining that kind of happiness, and yet to them it would have sounded like nothing special at all!) That was the birthright of our ancestors. Today. . .nothing. We can expect nothing. If we don't fit into the 'top 10%' or the 'bottom feeding pond scum' demographic section, we can expect to never marry, never have children, and just die. Just hurry up and die -- that's all our women want from us, that's all they're going to want from us, so long as this culture is maintained.
There's no hope in other directions as well. For instance, evolution was discovered by Charles Darwin in 1860, Capitalism was invented by Adam Smith in 1776 or so. Even though both have been scientifically proven beyond all doubt, today there are as few adherents to either as ever! Instead 50% of America are still mind-numbingly stupid creationists. Instead socialism, which has failed over and over and over again, is in power all over the globe. In 1800, most of the world was still ruled by an aristocracy, a constitutional monarch, or some other elite that lived by a code of honor and tradition. Today we are all mobocracys, voting by the lowest common denominator, ruled by idiots instead of geniuses. And while Michelangelo was being funded by the government of Florence in the 1500's, and Shakespeare hosted by Queen Elizabeth in the 1600's, today entertainers cater to the crowd -- and their entertainment is just as stupid, low, and crass as the crowd they entertain. Brittney Spears. Michael Jackson. You get the idea.
Artistically, we have regressed. Ideologically, we have become relativists and nihilists, where before we were the philosophers of the Enlightenment. Where race realism was apparent to every last man on the street, now barely 1% dare to breathe its name. Where sodomy was reviled everywhere, now we allow gays to marry and adopt children. Everything is going backwards, regressing, just like the genetics of our people. Regressing further and further backwards, into the new dark ages. Even machines cannot save us from ourselves and our poisoned, awful beliefs. Our decline is visible all around us. The Empire State Building was built in a year. It was built in 1930. The 'Freedom Tower' hasn't built a single floor in 8 years. It has all the modern technology and materials of 2009 to work with. It has a population three times as large to hire from. It has everything, the vast resources of the entire United States of America -- and it cannot build a damn first floor in eight years. Does this sound like an upward moving nation? Does this sing of progress? Is this cause for optimism? For hope?
In 1900 we were writing about journeys to the moon and the center of the earth. In 2009 we write about vampires sucking each other's blood. Is this cause for hope?
Let's face it. There are no green shoots. Nothing is going right. We aren't making any progress. We have no cause for optimism.
There are ways to improve our situation, but they narrow down to two basic acts: A technological singularity that replaces mankind, or a violent revolution that founds a new nation for a new, carefully selected and carefully bred and carefully led people. We can hope for one or the other, and nothing else. Our energy should be dedicated to one or the other, and nothing else. We should argue for one or the other, and nothing else. We should endorse one or the other, and nothing else. The flakey conservatives who crow over one meaningless victory or another, one hopeful sign or another, are just the opium of the malcontents. A safety valve. While taking pride in delaying the health care bill, or winning another meaningless election, or defeating the Iraqi insurgents, or whatever, the inexorable trends keep closing in, and the water keeps rising and rising over our heads. It is as senseless to believe in a conservative victory today, as to imagine the battle of the bulge was the great turning of the tides and the Nazis would win WWII from here out. By God, I have the deepest respect for the people who fought the Battle of Berlin, with no hope at all in their breasts, blaring out the Gotterdamerung over their radios, instead of any further military orders! Those people are feasting in Valhalla. But the German who died thinking they were just about to turn the tide, who thought the Battle of the Bulge, or Kursk, or some other meaningless short victory, was a 'green shoot' leading towards the promised land -- you pitiable poor deluded souls!
Let's not charm ourselves with will o' the wisps of false hopes. Let's not weaken ourselves with siren songs of empty prospects. It is beneath us. Reality is grim, we must be even grimmer. The world is harsh, we must be even harsher. That is the only path out of our nightmare.
Saturday, September 12, 2009
Great Anime Openings:
If someone is unwilling to watch even a single anime episode or movie, maybe it would be easier to show off, instead, simply the openings (and/or endings) of these animes, and thus the amazing range of music, art, and stories anime has to offer. There isn't as great a collection of art as my previous post outside of the louvre, and hopefully these little snippets can prove it:
Haruhi Suzumiya:
K-ON!:
AIR:
Record of Lodoss War:
Stellvia:
Higurashi no Naku Koro Ni:
Crest of the Stars:
Card Captor Sakura:
Sailor Moon:
Cowboy Bebop:
Naruto:
One Piece:
Whether it's high fantasy, science fiction, school life, romance, horror, fighting, or any other genre, anime has it covered, and has it covered well. Isn't it time to begin?
Haruhi Suzumiya:
K-ON!:
AIR:
Record of Lodoss War:
Stellvia:
Higurashi no Naku Koro Ni:
Crest of the Stars:
Card Captor Sakura:
Sailor Moon:
Cowboy Bebop:
Naruto:
One Piece:
Whether it's high fantasy, science fiction, school life, romance, horror, fighting, or any other genre, anime has it covered, and has it covered well. Isn't it time to begin?
Anime IS the alternative media:
American media is hopelessly liberal, hopelessly commercialized, and hopelessly judaized. Hollywood produces about a dozen holocaust movies a year, and in-between you are welcome to watch blacks playing ball games, or women overcoming their abusive husbands, or gays finding their one true love, or any other story so long as it's incredibly boring/disgusting/stupid.
Sadly, this media extends into who is and isn't published, so we cannot seek to escape the mind deadening TV sets with intellectually stimulating books. Instead we just get more of the same. Harry Potter is the flagship of modern publishing, but what was that story really?
The moral of the story of Harry Potter is we shouldn't discriminate against 'mudbloods,' or try to preserve someone's heritage or abilities. Even though magic was clearly a trait passed down through genetics, and that you were much more likely to have magical children born from magical parents, we were supposed to allow muggles into all our institutions and breed the magical race out of existence. This was suppose to occur at the same time as the normal race-mixing was proceeding, harry with cho, ginny with Dean ((asian and black, at least according to the movies.)) It was one giant orgy of non-discrimination and fighting the evil dark wizard racists who threatened this multicultural utopia. No matter how well a story is written, when you're rooting for the bad guys and can't stand the wussy good guys who won't even cast 'kill' spells on their opponents, you grow tired of western literature quickly.
Or take Twilight, a book about how an ordinary jane is magically the most attractive girl on earth to a host of super-powered, immortal, handsome, intelligent, charming, seductive, and 'dangerous' men. We can read all about how exciting it is to hang out with them, how much classical music and ballroom dancing they know, how strong and fast they are, and what a rush it is to never know whether they'll attack you the very next second. All the more fun, said girl has a harem of boys all eagerly vying for this role of superhuman boyfriend, so if she ever gets angry or bored with one, she can always switch to another. What kind of moral is there to this story? Every girl deserves not one but five princes who are simultaneously infinitely wealthy and devoted and infinitely fickle and dangerous? Are these the sort of expectations we should be setting up in our teenage girl's heads? It is basically porn -- In fact, the best selling books have always been porn for girls. For every Heinlein or Asimov, there's a million 'Dangerous Desires' printed and bought every year.
It is rare for a good movie to come out in America. Lord of the Rings is good, Braveheart is good, Ironman was good, a few others. But it's like picking through the wreckage of an earthquake or fire for the few scraps of your home that haven't been destroyed. TV is even more hopeless. Most of it is designed for girls, so that's out right from the beginning. All of it teaches the same multicult pap that we get in school and our churches -- white men are always the criminals, women are stronger than men in every fight, race mixing is the norm, at least 30% of the population is gay, etc. The stories also have no plot and no message. It's either the same story every time -- 'guy enters hospital, hilarity ensues,' 'guy enters courtroom, hilarity ensues,' 'cops find dead body, hilarity ensues,' -- or it's just empty soap operas or 'sitcoms' with no attempt at any plot. Once I was watching a tv show set in the west, about a family moving west in a covered wagon. I thought, 'here's a story that can't go wrong!' The girls were in old fashioned dresses, everyone within sight was white, the father even had a commanding presence the daughters would obey. But the dream didn't last long -- sure enough, somehow or other, it managed to throw in a gathering of kids at the front lawn of a school, racing each other to a tree and back. And sure enough, after proper encouragement by the girl's elders that "You can do anything if you try," and "Don't let people tease you, stand up to them," the girl challenged the fastest boy to a race, and IN HER LONG SKIRT beat him handily, making him the laughing stock of the community and the girl the newly crowned heroine of diversity and emancipation.
It's incredibly frustrating. Even in our music, songs with barely any intelligence above a frog's: "baby baby hold me tight, never let me go baby" and endless beats and repeating refrains, have replaced the songs of yore, both our rich folk music powered by pipes and fiddles, and our rich classical music powered by pianos or symphonies or opera choruses. Like usual, there is a great deal of good modern music, if you just look long enough and pick through the wreckage carefully -- but when people have never even heard the ancient music of the greatest musicians to ever live -- Beethoven, Bach, Mozart, Wagner, Haydn, Handel -- they shouldn't BE scrabbling around the landfills of modern music like starving dogs for some tiny chance at a meal.
Whites have no guidance about what to read, watch, or listen to. No one offers them a course outline on the Great Books of the western world, no one gives them the itunes collection of 'Wagner's complete operas.' Kids, when left to their own devices, will devour nothing but jewish garbage all their waking lives. But there is one alternative media that kids love, that boys love, that whites can love far more than anything the jews have to offer.
Anime and video games. Out of Japan comes dozens of tv shows every year, dozens of manga series, dozens of roleplaying games, dozens of sweeping modern orchestral soundtracks, everything a consumer need consume his entire life. There is no political correctness to any of it. Just good old fashioned story telling. The stories have plots -- they start and then they end, having delivered a series of important changes in-between. The stories have meaning, the level of dialogue in the anime is at the highest philosophical level. Tough questions are posed, tough choices are made by tough characters, and true emotions are displayed by true heroes, that could inspire anyone. There are plenty of tough, kick-butt girls in anime, but almost all of them still wear skirts and ribbons. And they still blush when complimented, or act cute, or cook -- ! It's at least 50 years behind the 'modern woman' image shown in the western media.
It's rare for me to cry, or care at all, from watching a western show. But in anime it's much more common. I cried when sephiroth killed aeris. I didn't cry when Snape killed dumbledor. The two are like light and darkness! The stories made in Japan have heart, they have passion, they have people trying their best, which makes you want them to be happy -- and it's horrible when they aren't! If you want to raise a healthy white child, if you want to cleanse your own mind from the tendrils of jewish brainwashing, there is only Japan. There is only the beautiful, spectacular, and incredible world of anime. This tiny island produces the majority of good art in the world, and has for the last 30 years. This tiny island is the cultural capital of the world, without it we'd have nothing -- with it, we have everything. All you ever need to know, you can learn from anime! Anime depicts the best of all possible worlds and the best of all possible people, men and women, each pursuing their respective roles, each great in their own way.
For most Americans, they have some sort of prejudice or hangup against anime. "The art style is too childish," or "anime is just porn," or "I don't want to read the subtitles." This is all nonsense. The Japanese language is one of the most beautiful on earth, a vowel between every consonant, and the voice actors hired in Japan are on the same scale as Tom Cruise or Val Kilmer is over here -- all dubbed anime is butchered anime. As for anime being childish, the large eyes are beautiful and they're expressive, far better than the shit for cartoons we make over here, that are intentionally ugly and poorly drawn, and the topics and themes are always much more adult -- so much so that Americans are constantly censoring anime before letting it reach our kid's eyes. As far as porn goes, maybe they are drawn to be a little aesthetically pleasing, but the odds that a boy and a girl will even kiss on screen, is about 1/100th what you'd see from any typical american alternative. Compared to Dawson's Creek or whatever, anime is porn??? They have more respect for relationships, sex and love than we've had for decades.
With that in mind, everyone should drop what they are doing, sell their tv's, cancel their cable, and stop going to the theaters. Instead they should visit sites like:
http://anime-media.com/ or http://www.anilinkz.com/ And start streaming one marvelous anime after another. Commercial free. Expense free. PC free. But, don't stop at that. It's important to watch the best shows first, so that one doesn't get disenchanted or disillusioned with their bright new horizons. It's also important that people don't have to invest massive chunks of time into it at first, before they realize just how worth it, it is. For that purpose, I've even included a list of the all time greatest anime people should watch, in the order of short movies and OAV's first, and long series later:
1. Kiki's Delivery Service.
2. Mononoke Hime.
3. The Girl Who Leapt Through Time.
4. Grave of the Fireflies.
5. Fatal Fury.
6. Macross Plus.
7. Ninja Scroll.
8. Read or Die.
9. Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind.
Ok. Now for mid-length series of amazing quality:
1. K-ON!
2. REC.
3. Record of Lodoss War OAV.
4. AIR.
5. The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya.
6. Tengen Toppa Gurrenn Lagann.
7. Battle Athletes OAV.
8. RG Veda.
9. Iria: Zeiram the Animation.
10. Shamanic Princess.
11. Bastard!
Ok. Now for full seasons of goodness and joy:
1. Code Geass.
2. Cowboy Bebop.
3. Kanon.
4. Mahoromatic.
5. Martian Successor Nadesico.
7. Samurai Champloo.
8. Stellvia.
9. Utawarerumono.
10. Valkyria Chronicles.
11. Berserk.
12. Basilisk.
13. Evangelion.
And now for the sweeping epics of perfection:
1. Higurashi no Naku Koro.
2. Maho Shojo Lyrical Nanoha.
3. Sailor Moon.
4. Dragonball Z.
5. One Piece.
6. Naruto.
7. Inuyasha.
8. Ranma 1/2.
9. Rurouni Kenshin.
10. 12 Kingdoms.
11. Crest of the Stars.
12. Hayate no Gotoku.
13. Card Captor Sakura.
14. Full Metal Panic!
15. Zero no Tsukaima.
16. Prince of Tennis.
17. Vandread.
Looking at this collection of titles, the relative sparsity of good stories out of the west is all the more dreadful. Here's 50 titles that can compete with the best of the best out of Western media: Firefly, or Gilmore Girls, or Star Wars, or Lord of the Rings. Once you get into the right mood, the right mindset, you can glean so much more from each episode, than before you've understood their culture and language, too. Once you get over your holdups, and start searching for what's great inside each story, it truly becomes a prize. It'll make you laugh, cry, and rethink your life. It's just that great. It's what story telling was always meant to do -- and sadly, until we get our own media, it's the best we can possibly have.
Sadly, this media extends into who is and isn't published, so we cannot seek to escape the mind deadening TV sets with intellectually stimulating books. Instead we just get more of the same. Harry Potter is the flagship of modern publishing, but what was that story really?
The moral of the story of Harry Potter is we shouldn't discriminate against 'mudbloods,' or try to preserve someone's heritage or abilities. Even though magic was clearly a trait passed down through genetics, and that you were much more likely to have magical children born from magical parents, we were supposed to allow muggles into all our institutions and breed the magical race out of existence. This was suppose to occur at the same time as the normal race-mixing was proceeding, harry with cho, ginny with Dean ((asian and black, at least according to the movies.)) It was one giant orgy of non-discrimination and fighting the evil dark wizard racists who threatened this multicultural utopia. No matter how well a story is written, when you're rooting for the bad guys and can't stand the wussy good guys who won't even cast 'kill' spells on their opponents, you grow tired of western literature quickly.
Or take Twilight, a book about how an ordinary jane is magically the most attractive girl on earth to a host of super-powered, immortal, handsome, intelligent, charming, seductive, and 'dangerous' men. We can read all about how exciting it is to hang out with them, how much classical music and ballroom dancing they know, how strong and fast they are, and what a rush it is to never know whether they'll attack you the very next second. All the more fun, said girl has a harem of boys all eagerly vying for this role of superhuman boyfriend, so if she ever gets angry or bored with one, she can always switch to another. What kind of moral is there to this story? Every girl deserves not one but five princes who are simultaneously infinitely wealthy and devoted and infinitely fickle and dangerous? Are these the sort of expectations we should be setting up in our teenage girl's heads? It is basically porn -- In fact, the best selling books have always been porn for girls. For every Heinlein or Asimov, there's a million 'Dangerous Desires' printed and bought every year.
It is rare for a good movie to come out in America. Lord of the Rings is good, Braveheart is good, Ironman was good, a few others. But it's like picking through the wreckage of an earthquake or fire for the few scraps of your home that haven't been destroyed. TV is even more hopeless. Most of it is designed for girls, so that's out right from the beginning. All of it teaches the same multicult pap that we get in school and our churches -- white men are always the criminals, women are stronger than men in every fight, race mixing is the norm, at least 30% of the population is gay, etc. The stories also have no plot and no message. It's either the same story every time -- 'guy enters hospital, hilarity ensues,' 'guy enters courtroom, hilarity ensues,' 'cops find dead body, hilarity ensues,' -- or it's just empty soap operas or 'sitcoms' with no attempt at any plot. Once I was watching a tv show set in the west, about a family moving west in a covered wagon. I thought, 'here's a story that can't go wrong!' The girls were in old fashioned dresses, everyone within sight was white, the father even had a commanding presence the daughters would obey. But the dream didn't last long -- sure enough, somehow or other, it managed to throw in a gathering of kids at the front lawn of a school, racing each other to a tree and back. And sure enough, after proper encouragement by the girl's elders that "You can do anything if you try," and "Don't let people tease you, stand up to them," the girl challenged the fastest boy to a race, and IN HER LONG SKIRT beat him handily, making him the laughing stock of the community and the girl the newly crowned heroine of diversity and emancipation.
It's incredibly frustrating. Even in our music, songs with barely any intelligence above a frog's: "baby baby hold me tight, never let me go baby" and endless beats and repeating refrains, have replaced the songs of yore, both our rich folk music powered by pipes and fiddles, and our rich classical music powered by pianos or symphonies or opera choruses. Like usual, there is a great deal of good modern music, if you just look long enough and pick through the wreckage carefully -- but when people have never even heard the ancient music of the greatest musicians to ever live -- Beethoven, Bach, Mozart, Wagner, Haydn, Handel -- they shouldn't BE scrabbling around the landfills of modern music like starving dogs for some tiny chance at a meal.
Whites have no guidance about what to read, watch, or listen to. No one offers them a course outline on the Great Books of the western world, no one gives them the itunes collection of 'Wagner's complete operas.' Kids, when left to their own devices, will devour nothing but jewish garbage all their waking lives. But there is one alternative media that kids love, that boys love, that whites can love far more than anything the jews have to offer.
Anime and video games. Out of Japan comes dozens of tv shows every year, dozens of manga series, dozens of roleplaying games, dozens of sweeping modern orchestral soundtracks, everything a consumer need consume his entire life. There is no political correctness to any of it. Just good old fashioned story telling. The stories have plots -- they start and then they end, having delivered a series of important changes in-between. The stories have meaning, the level of dialogue in the anime is at the highest philosophical level. Tough questions are posed, tough choices are made by tough characters, and true emotions are displayed by true heroes, that could inspire anyone. There are plenty of tough, kick-butt girls in anime, but almost all of them still wear skirts and ribbons. And they still blush when complimented, or act cute, or cook -- ! It's at least 50 years behind the 'modern woman' image shown in the western media.
It's rare for me to cry, or care at all, from watching a western show. But in anime it's much more common. I cried when sephiroth killed aeris. I didn't cry when Snape killed dumbledor. The two are like light and darkness! The stories made in Japan have heart, they have passion, they have people trying their best, which makes you want them to be happy -- and it's horrible when they aren't! If you want to raise a healthy white child, if you want to cleanse your own mind from the tendrils of jewish brainwashing, there is only Japan. There is only the beautiful, spectacular, and incredible world of anime. This tiny island produces the majority of good art in the world, and has for the last 30 years. This tiny island is the cultural capital of the world, without it we'd have nothing -- with it, we have everything. All you ever need to know, you can learn from anime! Anime depicts the best of all possible worlds and the best of all possible people, men and women, each pursuing their respective roles, each great in their own way.
For most Americans, they have some sort of prejudice or hangup against anime. "The art style is too childish," or "anime is just porn," or "I don't want to read the subtitles." This is all nonsense. The Japanese language is one of the most beautiful on earth, a vowel between every consonant, and the voice actors hired in Japan are on the same scale as Tom Cruise or Val Kilmer is over here -- all dubbed anime is butchered anime. As for anime being childish, the large eyes are beautiful and they're expressive, far better than the shit for cartoons we make over here, that are intentionally ugly and poorly drawn, and the topics and themes are always much more adult -- so much so that Americans are constantly censoring anime before letting it reach our kid's eyes. As far as porn goes, maybe they are drawn to be a little aesthetically pleasing, but the odds that a boy and a girl will even kiss on screen, is about 1/100th what you'd see from any typical american alternative. Compared to Dawson's Creek or whatever, anime is porn??? They have more respect for relationships, sex and love than we've had for decades.
With that in mind, everyone should drop what they are doing, sell their tv's, cancel their cable, and stop going to the theaters. Instead they should visit sites like:
http://anime-media.com/ or http://www.anilinkz.com/ And start streaming one marvelous anime after another. Commercial free. Expense free. PC free. But, don't stop at that. It's important to watch the best shows first, so that one doesn't get disenchanted or disillusioned with their bright new horizons. It's also important that people don't have to invest massive chunks of time into it at first, before they realize just how worth it, it is. For that purpose, I've even included a list of the all time greatest anime people should watch, in the order of short movies and OAV's first, and long series later:
1. Kiki's Delivery Service.
2. Mononoke Hime.
3. The Girl Who Leapt Through Time.
4. Grave of the Fireflies.
5. Fatal Fury.
6. Macross Plus.
7. Ninja Scroll.
8. Read or Die.
9. Nausicaa of the Valley of the Wind.
Ok. Now for mid-length series of amazing quality:
1. K-ON!
2. REC.
3. Record of Lodoss War OAV.
4. AIR.
5. The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya.
6. Tengen Toppa Gurrenn Lagann.
7. Battle Athletes OAV.
8. RG Veda.
9. Iria: Zeiram the Animation.
10. Shamanic Princess.
11. Bastard!
Ok. Now for full seasons of goodness and joy:
1. Code Geass.
2. Cowboy Bebop.
3. Kanon.
4. Mahoromatic.
5. Martian Successor Nadesico.
7. Samurai Champloo.
8. Stellvia.
9. Utawarerumono.
10. Valkyria Chronicles.
11. Berserk.
12. Basilisk.
13. Evangelion.
And now for the sweeping epics of perfection:
1. Higurashi no Naku Koro.
2. Maho Shojo Lyrical Nanoha.
3. Sailor Moon.
4. Dragonball Z.
5. One Piece.
6. Naruto.
7. Inuyasha.
8. Ranma 1/2.
9. Rurouni Kenshin.
10. 12 Kingdoms.
11. Crest of the Stars.
12. Hayate no Gotoku.
13. Card Captor Sakura.
14. Full Metal Panic!
15. Zero no Tsukaima.
16. Prince of Tennis.
17. Vandread.
Looking at this collection of titles, the relative sparsity of good stories out of the west is all the more dreadful. Here's 50 titles that can compete with the best of the best out of Western media: Firefly, or Gilmore Girls, or Star Wars, or Lord of the Rings. Once you get into the right mood, the right mindset, you can glean so much more from each episode, than before you've understood their culture and language, too. Once you get over your holdups, and start searching for what's great inside each story, it truly becomes a prize. It'll make you laugh, cry, and rethink your life. It's just that great. It's what story telling was always meant to do -- and sadly, until we get our own media, it's the best we can possibly have.
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Jews Must Stop Reminding us of Our Crimes and Take Responsiblity For Their Own:
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v14/v14n1p-4_Weber.html
Just read the above link. Furthermore, it's dubious to call the Georgian, Stalin, a white (ie European) anyway. From that viewpoint, whites were solely the victims of the USSR, never the perpetrators. World War II was mainly a war between expansionist Germany and expansionist Bolshevism -- had Nazi Germany not invaded the USSR, the USSR would have invaded Nazi Germany. ((And yes, we have the official documented secret war plans of Stalin to prove this.)) http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/stalwarplans.html
Sadly, if France and the UK and the USA had simply minded their own business and stayed out of the fight, WW II could have stopped the evil Soviet Union before it had conquered and oppressed half of Europe, before it overthrew China and handed it to Mao (who went on to kill another 50 million people), before the Cold War, before Vietnam, before Afghanistan and the resulting support of Al Qaeda, before 9/11, before the entire timeline of misfortune the last 60 years have been. Anyone who complains that Nazi Germany, by killing some handful of jews (six million at most), is a worse timeline than the hundred million victims of communism, is basically declaring jews a divine and superhuman race, worth more than the lives of any number of goyish cattle. Anyone who complains that Nazi Germany conquering Russia up to the Urals (which was the full extent of Hitler's and Germany's plans, as repeated endlessly by their personal diaries, speeches, Mein Kampf, and every other source -- not world conquest) is unacceptable, must turn a blind eye to the alternative -- the USSR conquering half of Europe, including half of Germany. Why is this preferable? Is the USSR well known for being a better ruler and more civilized occupier than Nazi Germany? And yet, wherever Nazi Germany did occupy a country, its citizens were treated with respect and civility -- there are no horror stories of German invaders in France, Norway, or Italy -- but there are countless documented horror stories of what the USSR did when they invaded: rape and murder on an unprecedented scale, killing millions of ethnic Germans for no conceivable reason except that they could. Wherever Germans did treat natives with hostility, it was due to the nature of their enemy -- the USSR never signed the Geneva convention and never abided by any rules of war to the Germans, so Germany saw no reason to abide by the Geneva Convention or the rules of war to the Soviets. The Soviets chose the way they wished Germany to treat them through their own cruelty and barbarism.
Hungary, Poland, and Czechoslovakia can narrate their own horror stories about Soviet Occupation in the ensuing 50 years. So can the Baltics, who upon being reconquered in the 1940's as the Germans retreated, were slaughtered on a massive scale for daring to resist the Soviet Empire. I suspect if you simply took a poll today of any of these conquered countries, whether they had wished Nazi Germany had continued to occupy them for the next 50 years, or the USSR, they would all have supported Germany -- in fact most of Eastern Europe did support Nazi Germany -- they were fighting on the front lines side by side with the Germans for that very reason -- to avoid Soviet occupation at any price.
So now we have a Holocaust, which may or may not have happened (there is a complete lack of evidence in the form of any official document or any mass grave/gassed body at the supposed 'death camps'), that at most killed 6 million people, weighed against the horrors of communism, which under Lenin killed some 10 million people, and is directly the responsibility of the jewish people, followed by Stalin killing ten million more, indirectly the responsibility of the jewish people, and Mao killing 50 million more (plus Cambodia, Vietnam, etc killing their own millions), all indirectly the responsibility of the USSR's support, which in turn is the fault of jews, who created the USSR (and invented the very idea of Communism).
Not only this, but jews were instrumental in passing the 1965 Immigration Act, the Civil Rights Act, and various liberal laws into the United States ever since. 80% of jews voted for Obama and jews provided the majority of his campaign donations. This is by no means irregular but is the norm in all of America's elections, liberalism has always been the bulwark of jews and almost all the communist party members and spies for the USSR in the USA were jews. These liberal laws are all the direct responsibility of jews, and therefore the 37,000 white women raped per year by black men in America, the demographic overthrow of the once 90% white nation to a minority white nation in less than a century, affirmative action, the bank bailouts (money that mainly went from the jewish controlled Federal Reserve to jewish owned banks like Goldman Sachs), and perpetual debt that will forever cripple the middle class whites of America.
It may be that the worst crime of the 20th century was not, in fact, the Bolshevik Revolution, it was the 1965 Immigration Act that destroyed an entire continent of whites who had the brightest, freest, and richest future on the globe. Either way, jews are responsible for both.
Furthermore, jews own Hollywood and control almost all broadcasting stations, newspapers, magazines, and music records. http://www.libreopinion.com/members/standarteslc/jewishquestion03.html Therefore, everything they say using these devices, and the consequences that ensue from people listening to what they say, is the direct responsibility of jews. There is no doubt that movies, television, and music have all been extremely liberal, multicultural, multiracial, feminist, pro-gay, hedonistic, and in general nothing but rot and sewage. There is also no doubt that this media has had a dramatic impact on people's minds and behavior (see http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32387123/ns/health-behavior/). Just as people are responsible for what values and morals they propagate at the pulpit, what they teach their children, and among their friends -- people are responsible for the values and morals they teach in their stories, whether fictional or non-fiction, and the effect these have on society at large. Jews have the ancient responsibility of being the source of what's taught on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday (Islam, Judaism, and Christianity.) But now they have the added responsibility of what is being taught 24/7, 7 days a week, 365 days a year, on every glowing box, every sheet of printed paper, every singer's lyrics on Earth. When everything they teach is poison, it's no wonder the world is a poisonous place to live in.
Jews also have a special responsibility, and that is the fact that they have an IQ of 115. A full standard deviation above the verbal IQ's of both Asians and Whites. This gives them a special power to lie, deceive, manipulate and control all the other races of the world -- who are too stupid to keep up with their smooth tongues and sharp brains, or pierce through the haze of lies jews can so easily weave. As Spiderman taught us (itself a story by Stan Lee, a jew), 'with great power comes great responsibility.' The ability for jews to use their verbal IQ to convince people of anything, however absurd, must be paired with the responsibility to be scrupulously fair and honest with this power -- or else they commit a deep sin against all of us. Fraud and Force are equally oppressive tools, just as it is never right to oppress or enslave others with the excuse "I'm stronger than them so it's okay," it is also inexcusable to enslave others with lies through the excuse, "I'm smarter than them so it's okay." Instead of being the most honest and circumspect people on Earth, aware that like Giants anything they say will be listened to and thus they must watch their every step to avoid crushing the ant-like intellects of their lessers, they simply glory in their strength and use every inch of it to pursue their own interests at everyone else's expense.
As Shakespeare once said: "O, it is excellent to have a giant's strength, but it is tyrannous to use it like a giant." Trust the greatest writer of all time (who is also White, by the way), to say my point rather well.
Going back to my previous point, that Hitler did not 'start' WW II anymore than France, Britain, or the USSR started it, and that jews were instrumental in both the great depression and the Versailles treaty that so antagonized Germany in the first place and brought Hitler to power, the greatest crime of Whites in the 20th century was World War II, where '50 million people died.' First off, all of these casualties were of other whites, so whatever evil whites have done, we owe an apology to no one else for our actions, nor do we owe blacks, hispanics, muslims, Indians, or any other group our land for having perpetrated WW II. Second, jews should take as much responsibility for World War II as whites, given their influential advisers who surrounded Stalin (Ehrenburg), Roosevelt (Morgenthau), and Churchill (Lindemann). There's even evidence all of these world leaders were partially jewish themselves. The relatively minor crime of the Holocaust, in comparison to the losses we suffered during WWII (Germany alone lost more people than the over-inflated figure of 6 million jews twice-fold), cannot in the least compare to the direct losses whites suffered at the hands of jews just a decade before under Lenin's bolshevik ravaging of Russia. I have no interest sparing any sympathy for jews who refuse to accept any blame or spare any sympathy for their victims. Why should we be held to a higher moral standard than they hold themselves?
Anti-semitism is a reaction to jewish behavior, to the damage jews have caused to whites in the past, and still cause every day to whites in the present. If jews want to stop being hated, they must apologize for everything they've ever done, take responsibility for their crimes and the blood of the innocents on their hands, and then cease and desist perpetuating their crimes on those of us who still remain! It is not our job to stop hating jews, it's theirs. It is much worse to deny the jewish crimes against whites, than white crimes against jews -- because A) the crimes of the jews are on an entirely larger scale. B) the crimes of the jews are infinitely more documented and proven. Until they get it through their head that morality is a world of universal standards, of give and take, that you cannot denounce others for the motes in their eyes while you refuse to address the beam in your own eyes, anti-semitism is the moral high ground and the healthy and sensible reaction of all people to any contact with Jews. Anti-semitism is the same as saying 'anti murderers,' 'anti rapists,' 'anti thieves,' 'anti liars,' 'anti hypocrites,' 'anti genociders,' 'anti perverters.' Why shouldn't we be against these things? Jewish behavior makes them the most hated people in world history. Not only whites hate them, but everyone does. Blacks hate them, the Middle East hates them, everyone hates them. What are the odds that the entire world is 'prejudiced' and 'mean-spirited,' as opposed to the jews being genuinely responsible for the ill feelings they breed? Jews try to make anti-semites feel like they are in the minority, or some sort of low class buffoons. The only problem is, anti-semitism is the majority opinion of the world, across time and space, and is also shared by the greatest western thinkers of all time: from Cicero to Shakespeare to Luther to Voltaire to Kant.
If I'm to be grouped with that kind of company, well then throw me into the briar patch. ::rolls eyes:: Even so, I have nothing against jews personally. I love Mark Rosewater, who designs Magic the Gathering. I love Vanessa Carlton, who plays the piano. I love Joss Whedon, who wrote Firefly. This isn't about any jew personally, it is about Jews. Jews are the only people on earth who have never apologized or felt sorry for anything they've ever done. They consider themselves a chosen people, above morality, who can do whatever they want and can never be reproached for any of it. If anyone denounces a jew, it's because they are prejudiced and evil -- it can never be because the jew is genuinely to blame for anything -- ever. Whether jews are caught in the white prostitution rings that enslave 500,000 white women a year, or organ harvesting rings in New Jersey, or ponzi schemes to the order of 50 billion dollars -- jews are never in the wrong. Jews are never to blame. Jews are never bad. Jews don't have to apologize or take responsibility for anything. I am sorry, but Man is a moral being. If we don't have morals, we are no better than animals. Morality is our key to the divine, the sacred, the valuable aspects of life -- any group that jettisons such a central concept is no longer within the pale of humanity. Either they must return to a world of morals, responsibilities, guilt, shame, and universal absolutes -- or they must be put down like any other rabid dog who can no longer listen to reason and infects everything they touch with yet more madness and death.
It is up to Jews, not whites, whether they wish to be hated, hunted, and despised for the rest of time -- or whether they wish to assimilate and rejoin the human fold. The jews cannot win, they will never win, this horrible war they have declared on the rest of the world. Time and again they have been struck down, exiled, scattered, or killed, but they never learn, not from a thousand repetitions. Sooner or later it WILL catch up to them. Every year they toss white phosphorous gas on Gazan children, skim a few trillion dollars of tax dollars off the world economy for themsleves, or throw prisoners of conscience into jail all across Europe for offending jewish sensibilities -- the hatred for them grows and grows. For every action, an equal and opposite reaction. The fires of hatred have been stoked for the past 100 years against them, and jews must be living in a fantasy world, to think it will never rebound against them, that no one will ever be strong enough to oppose them, or exact vengeance upon them, someday in the future! For their own sake and ours (their victims), I wish jews would realize that time is running out.
Just read the above link. Furthermore, it's dubious to call the Georgian, Stalin, a white (ie European) anyway. From that viewpoint, whites were solely the victims of the USSR, never the perpetrators. World War II was mainly a war between expansionist Germany and expansionist Bolshevism -- had Nazi Germany not invaded the USSR, the USSR would have invaded Nazi Germany. ((And yes, we have the official documented secret war plans of Stalin to prove this.)) http://www.wintersonnenwende.com/scriptorium/english/archives/articles/stalwarplans.html
Sadly, if France and the UK and the USA had simply minded their own business and stayed out of the fight, WW II could have stopped the evil Soviet Union before it had conquered and oppressed half of Europe, before it overthrew China and handed it to Mao (who went on to kill another 50 million people), before the Cold War, before Vietnam, before Afghanistan and the resulting support of Al Qaeda, before 9/11, before the entire timeline of misfortune the last 60 years have been. Anyone who complains that Nazi Germany, by killing some handful of jews (six million at most), is a worse timeline than the hundred million victims of communism, is basically declaring jews a divine and superhuman race, worth more than the lives of any number of goyish cattle. Anyone who complains that Nazi Germany conquering Russia up to the Urals (which was the full extent of Hitler's and Germany's plans, as repeated endlessly by their personal diaries, speeches, Mein Kampf, and every other source -- not world conquest) is unacceptable, must turn a blind eye to the alternative -- the USSR conquering half of Europe, including half of Germany. Why is this preferable? Is the USSR well known for being a better ruler and more civilized occupier than Nazi Germany? And yet, wherever Nazi Germany did occupy a country, its citizens were treated with respect and civility -- there are no horror stories of German invaders in France, Norway, or Italy -- but there are countless documented horror stories of what the USSR did when they invaded: rape and murder on an unprecedented scale, killing millions of ethnic Germans for no conceivable reason except that they could. Wherever Germans did treat natives with hostility, it was due to the nature of their enemy -- the USSR never signed the Geneva convention and never abided by any rules of war to the Germans, so Germany saw no reason to abide by the Geneva Convention or the rules of war to the Soviets. The Soviets chose the way they wished Germany to treat them through their own cruelty and barbarism.
Hungary, Poland, and Czechoslovakia can narrate their own horror stories about Soviet Occupation in the ensuing 50 years. So can the Baltics, who upon being reconquered in the 1940's as the Germans retreated, were slaughtered on a massive scale for daring to resist the Soviet Empire. I suspect if you simply took a poll today of any of these conquered countries, whether they had wished Nazi Germany had continued to occupy them for the next 50 years, or the USSR, they would all have supported Germany -- in fact most of Eastern Europe did support Nazi Germany -- they were fighting on the front lines side by side with the Germans for that very reason -- to avoid Soviet occupation at any price.
So now we have a Holocaust, which may or may not have happened (there is a complete lack of evidence in the form of any official document or any mass grave/gassed body at the supposed 'death camps'), that at most killed 6 million people, weighed against the horrors of communism, which under Lenin killed some 10 million people, and is directly the responsibility of the jewish people, followed by Stalin killing ten million more, indirectly the responsibility of the jewish people, and Mao killing 50 million more (plus Cambodia, Vietnam, etc killing their own millions), all indirectly the responsibility of the USSR's support, which in turn is the fault of jews, who created the USSR (and invented the very idea of Communism).
Not only this, but jews were instrumental in passing the 1965 Immigration Act, the Civil Rights Act, and various liberal laws into the United States ever since. 80% of jews voted for Obama and jews provided the majority of his campaign donations. This is by no means irregular but is the norm in all of America's elections, liberalism has always been the bulwark of jews and almost all the communist party members and spies for the USSR in the USA were jews. These liberal laws are all the direct responsibility of jews, and therefore the 37,000 white women raped per year by black men in America, the demographic overthrow of the once 90% white nation to a minority white nation in less than a century, affirmative action, the bank bailouts (money that mainly went from the jewish controlled Federal Reserve to jewish owned banks like Goldman Sachs), and perpetual debt that will forever cripple the middle class whites of America.
It may be that the worst crime of the 20th century was not, in fact, the Bolshevik Revolution, it was the 1965 Immigration Act that destroyed an entire continent of whites who had the brightest, freest, and richest future on the globe. Either way, jews are responsible for both.
Furthermore, jews own Hollywood and control almost all broadcasting stations, newspapers, magazines, and music records. http://www.libreopinion.com/members/standarteslc/jewishquestion03.html Therefore, everything they say using these devices, and the consequences that ensue from people listening to what they say, is the direct responsibility of jews. There is no doubt that movies, television, and music have all been extremely liberal, multicultural, multiracial, feminist, pro-gay, hedonistic, and in general nothing but rot and sewage. There is also no doubt that this media has had a dramatic impact on people's minds and behavior (see http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32387123/ns/health-behavior/). Just as people are responsible for what values and morals they propagate at the pulpit, what they teach their children, and among their friends -- people are responsible for the values and morals they teach in their stories, whether fictional or non-fiction, and the effect these have on society at large. Jews have the ancient responsibility of being the source of what's taught on Friday, Saturday, and Sunday (Islam, Judaism, and Christianity.) But now they have the added responsibility of what is being taught 24/7, 7 days a week, 365 days a year, on every glowing box, every sheet of printed paper, every singer's lyrics on Earth. When everything they teach is poison, it's no wonder the world is a poisonous place to live in.
Jews also have a special responsibility, and that is the fact that they have an IQ of 115. A full standard deviation above the verbal IQ's of both Asians and Whites. This gives them a special power to lie, deceive, manipulate and control all the other races of the world -- who are too stupid to keep up with their smooth tongues and sharp brains, or pierce through the haze of lies jews can so easily weave. As Spiderman taught us (itself a story by Stan Lee, a jew), 'with great power comes great responsibility.' The ability for jews to use their verbal IQ to convince people of anything, however absurd, must be paired with the responsibility to be scrupulously fair and honest with this power -- or else they commit a deep sin against all of us. Fraud and Force are equally oppressive tools, just as it is never right to oppress or enslave others with the excuse "I'm stronger than them so it's okay," it is also inexcusable to enslave others with lies through the excuse, "I'm smarter than them so it's okay." Instead of being the most honest and circumspect people on Earth, aware that like Giants anything they say will be listened to and thus they must watch their every step to avoid crushing the ant-like intellects of their lessers, they simply glory in their strength and use every inch of it to pursue their own interests at everyone else's expense.
As Shakespeare once said: "O, it is excellent to have a giant's strength, but it is tyrannous to use it like a giant." Trust the greatest writer of all time (who is also White, by the way), to say my point rather well.
Going back to my previous point, that Hitler did not 'start' WW II anymore than France, Britain, or the USSR started it, and that jews were instrumental in both the great depression and the Versailles treaty that so antagonized Germany in the first place and brought Hitler to power, the greatest crime of Whites in the 20th century was World War II, where '50 million people died.' First off, all of these casualties were of other whites, so whatever evil whites have done, we owe an apology to no one else for our actions, nor do we owe blacks, hispanics, muslims, Indians, or any other group our land for having perpetrated WW II. Second, jews should take as much responsibility for World War II as whites, given their influential advisers who surrounded Stalin (Ehrenburg), Roosevelt (Morgenthau), and Churchill (Lindemann). There's even evidence all of these world leaders were partially jewish themselves. The relatively minor crime of the Holocaust, in comparison to the losses we suffered during WWII (Germany alone lost more people than the over-inflated figure of 6 million jews twice-fold), cannot in the least compare to the direct losses whites suffered at the hands of jews just a decade before under Lenin's bolshevik ravaging of Russia. I have no interest sparing any sympathy for jews who refuse to accept any blame or spare any sympathy for their victims. Why should we be held to a higher moral standard than they hold themselves?
Anti-semitism is a reaction to jewish behavior, to the damage jews have caused to whites in the past, and still cause every day to whites in the present. If jews want to stop being hated, they must apologize for everything they've ever done, take responsibility for their crimes and the blood of the innocents on their hands, and then cease and desist perpetuating their crimes on those of us who still remain! It is not our job to stop hating jews, it's theirs. It is much worse to deny the jewish crimes against whites, than white crimes against jews -- because A) the crimes of the jews are on an entirely larger scale. B) the crimes of the jews are infinitely more documented and proven. Until they get it through their head that morality is a world of universal standards, of give and take, that you cannot denounce others for the motes in their eyes while you refuse to address the beam in your own eyes, anti-semitism is the moral high ground and the healthy and sensible reaction of all people to any contact with Jews. Anti-semitism is the same as saying 'anti murderers,' 'anti rapists,' 'anti thieves,' 'anti liars,' 'anti hypocrites,' 'anti genociders,' 'anti perverters.' Why shouldn't we be against these things? Jewish behavior makes them the most hated people in world history. Not only whites hate them, but everyone does. Blacks hate them, the Middle East hates them, everyone hates them. What are the odds that the entire world is 'prejudiced' and 'mean-spirited,' as opposed to the jews being genuinely responsible for the ill feelings they breed? Jews try to make anti-semites feel like they are in the minority, or some sort of low class buffoons. The only problem is, anti-semitism is the majority opinion of the world, across time and space, and is also shared by the greatest western thinkers of all time: from Cicero to Shakespeare to Luther to Voltaire to Kant.
If I'm to be grouped with that kind of company, well then throw me into the briar patch. ::rolls eyes:: Even so, I have nothing against jews personally. I love Mark Rosewater, who designs Magic the Gathering. I love Vanessa Carlton, who plays the piano. I love Joss Whedon, who wrote Firefly. This isn't about any jew personally, it is about Jews. Jews are the only people on earth who have never apologized or felt sorry for anything they've ever done. They consider themselves a chosen people, above morality, who can do whatever they want and can never be reproached for any of it. If anyone denounces a jew, it's because they are prejudiced and evil -- it can never be because the jew is genuinely to blame for anything -- ever. Whether jews are caught in the white prostitution rings that enslave 500,000 white women a year, or organ harvesting rings in New Jersey, or ponzi schemes to the order of 50 billion dollars -- jews are never in the wrong. Jews are never to blame. Jews are never bad. Jews don't have to apologize or take responsibility for anything. I am sorry, but Man is a moral being. If we don't have morals, we are no better than animals. Morality is our key to the divine, the sacred, the valuable aspects of life -- any group that jettisons such a central concept is no longer within the pale of humanity. Either they must return to a world of morals, responsibilities, guilt, shame, and universal absolutes -- or they must be put down like any other rabid dog who can no longer listen to reason and infects everything they touch with yet more madness and death.
It is up to Jews, not whites, whether they wish to be hated, hunted, and despised for the rest of time -- or whether they wish to assimilate and rejoin the human fold. The jews cannot win, they will never win, this horrible war they have declared on the rest of the world. Time and again they have been struck down, exiled, scattered, or killed, but they never learn, not from a thousand repetitions. Sooner or later it WILL catch up to them. Every year they toss white phosphorous gas on Gazan children, skim a few trillion dollars of tax dollars off the world economy for themsleves, or throw prisoners of conscience into jail all across Europe for offending jewish sensibilities -- the hatred for them grows and grows. For every action, an equal and opposite reaction. The fires of hatred have been stoked for the past 100 years against them, and jews must be living in a fantasy world, to think it will never rebound against them, that no one will ever be strong enough to oppose them, or exact vengeance upon them, someday in the future! For their own sake and ours (their victims), I wish jews would realize that time is running out.
Sunday, September 6, 2009
30 to 50 Years
I predict a complete collapse of the present order within 30 to 50 years. I don't have any magical powers of foresight, but there are basically three alternate timelines the world could now go down:
1. Gradual collapse model. In this model, there is no flash point, there is no 'before and after,' things just generally degrade and wind down to a more sustainable level of poverty and development. This would be much like the end of the Roman Empire and people slowly winding down to feudalism. The manufacturing sector and trade sectors of the economy were abandoned, populations shrank, and everyone took up farming and ground out a miserable existence, isolated from even the nearby villages a few miles away.
For our modern times, it means that as the white population shrinks, more and more of the economy stands on the shoulders of the mexicans and blacks, who shrink the economy to something they can achieve and produce. We will have the economy of Mexico or Columbia or Ghana or something, each year getting slightly worse off until we reach some stable floor that even other races can maintain.
It remains an open question whether Asians will inherit the earth or simply die off like we did, a victim to their own success and prosperity. Asian birth rates are as low as white birth rates, and there is little evidence that they haven't bought into the multicultural dogma -- it is more likely that being poorer, they just haven't been as juicy targets for mass immigration as we have. Their time will soon come after ours, any day now I expect Japan to surrender and open their borders to mass immigration, which will be the East's death knell and probably the saddest day in human history.
Supposing Asians do die off, the sub races of the world would level everything to a much lower order of civilization than anything whites or asians achieved. Then it would be a race against time to see if they evolved into a higher order of Man or the sun blew up and humanity died off. It is quite possible that if, say, Islam took over, that we would be caught in an endless non-evolving cycle that manages to perfectly stop all progress. A 'brave new world' where the system has been ground to a complete halt with no prospect for change. It is also possible that there would be a niche for a new intelligent race to evolve and take over, and with the proper culture of expansionism and self-confidence, could achieve the same goals we had, only much later than we could have achieved them. Only time could tell.
2. Total Collapse Model: Under this theory, the restriction of resources and overpopulation of the earth does not sit well in people's throats, and they resolve to do something about it rather than lay down and die. This would galvanize not only whites and Asians to preserve themselves, but also blacks, Indians, hispanics and all the rest would be clawing at each other's throats for that last scrap of food or oil or shelter. In fact, what we could see is say, food riots among poor urban blacks spreading out into the suburbs where they start butchering and eating the white yuppies around them, followed by an immense backlash of white vigilante justice rounding up and killing black 'savages,' and then the military fissioning across various tribal and philosophical fault lines and an enormous civil war that would be mimicked all across the world -- muslims vs. europeans vs. europeon liberals, elite whites in south america vs. commoner hispanics, russians vs. muslims/turks, indian guest workers vs. saudi overlords, and so on. If conditions become harsh enough, fast enough, that people are shocked by their change in fortune, it could radicalize everyone and let them feel that violence is worth the gamble.
In this constant pressure of poor vs. rich revolutions, race wars, and civil wars, white nationalists could carve out their own living space and fight like badgers to hold onto it as the outside world descends into chaos. With no organized body to resist our move, our greater intellect and higher morale would secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. This would be the best chance for whites, and what we have to be hoping for as America's, and Europe's, future.
Is it possible for the economy to collapse so thoroughly so soon? I think so, and it's based on the idea that most of today's wealth is illusory. If IQ and wealth are closely related like Lynn says, the dysgenic trends around the world are going to show up eventually in our wealth-creating power. If no cheap alternative to fossil fuels can be found, and fossil fuels are depleted in the next few decades, the entire modern economy will come to a grinding halt. If parasites really do outnumber producers, in terms of corporate welfare and poverty welfare, of jewish bankers skimming off the top and black criminals raiding from the bottom, there is no mathematical way for us to end up rich and prosperous. Today's economy is structurally and inherently unstable, floating on bubble after bubble of imagined but not real wealth, living off a future debt we can never repay, and relying on consumers who can't afford anything they buy. If Global Warming is true, much of our living space will become unlivable -- too hot, underwater, or who knows what, adding yet higher costs to everyone's lives.
As each generation of children gets further removed from any sense of family stability, when grandparents and even great grandparents have always been divorced and all children across the board are illegitimate with mothers inviting new boyfriends into the house every other week, all concepts of morality will vanish and life will become a hedonistic storm of manic-depression and short time horizons inimical to child-rearing or economic success. Mental illness, drug use, alcohol abuse, suicides and NEETS will expand exponentially until there is practically no one left to run the country. Collapse will start in the souls of our children and then explode outwards into the 'real world' of jobs and health.
I also predict that in 30 to 50 years, no one will care much about Hitler, Martin Luther King, apartheid, segregation, or the Holocaust. It will all be relegated to the dustbin of history, and as all our studies show, our education courses are so incompetent at teaching history, that no college graduate by then will know what century WWII even occurred in, just like nobody knows what century the Civil War occurred in now. In the face of complete ignorance and no living link to any 'repression' or 'genocide' of minorities (which will sound meaningless to them since whites will be the minority in all countries whites live in and non-whites the majority), whites will be less interested in feeling guilty and more interested in the clear and present abuses and dangers they themselves face every day. World War II was 70 years ago, that already sounds incredibly ancient, sometime just after the thirty years war or the crusades. What about when it was 120 years ago? Is anyone going to be mentioning WWII every two seconds as their proof of every argument then? We may as well mention Hannibal crossing the Alps or the battle at Avincourt.
Therefore the total collapse model will involve a total collapse of the economy, a total collapse of today's popular culture and priorities, a total collapse of the family, a total collapse of the environment, a total collapse of racial and ethnic and religious harmony (think of the sudden massacre by the hutus against the tutsis), and a total collapse of the world's population (which I also predict, in this scheme, will have skyrocketed to something like 12 or 15 billion, not the rosy 9 billion of the UN, which predicts that magically, blacks will get their reproduction rates under control.) With so many things falling apart, it will become possible for new worlds to be built. Those with the most will to power will emerge at the top in a collapsed world, just as today the most mealy mouthed suck up lying scum are best situated to wealth and high status today. When environments change, 'survival of the fittest' also changes. Racism may not be suitable to 'get ahead' today, but tomorrow it will be the only game in town.
3. Technological Singularity: Under this theory we avoid all the current issues by simply inventing our way out of it. Suppose we invent a new food source 100 times as efficient as all current ones. We invent a new power source that solves global warming and provides infinite free energy for everyone. We invent computers to do all our thinking for us so it doesn't matter what our IQ is anymore. We invent robots to raise our children and care for our elderly, and so on. Or we discover the key to immortality, can genetically engineer ourselves to be super smart, super pretty and super well behaved at all times. There is boundless power within science to change any aspect of our lives. Once we cross the threshold of a technological singularity (wherein one invention leads to the next which leads to the next in a chain reaction we can no longer stop or avoid, pulling us into the center of a new science world we can't even imagine today like a whirlpool), it doesn't matter what was going on within humanity before. It doesn't matter what we do now, what happened in the past, or what we'll be doing in the future as the technology begins to cascade -- it becomes a force of its own, perhaps even supplanting our existence with sentient machines or bacterial colonies or superhumans.
Someday science fiction will become science fact. So long as we continue discovering and inventing, we always approach closer to the day of technological singularity. Our video games have already incorporated motion sensing virtual reality technology. Our computer chips are already reaching the atomic scale. And so on. Before we know it, we'll have passed the event horizon and humanity will become a footnote. People are constantly warning about the perils of this technology or that one, it's hard to believe that when you look at the vast array of technologies, all of which contain their own cataclysmic perils, we'll be able to avoid them all. One invention or another is going to change reality forever, and it is simply too enticing to avoid them all, given how many benefits each one yields.
Of course, this is just one possible timeline, I'm not saying it's inevitable, just that this is how it would come about, if this timeline were the future.
Conclusion: So with all this spread out in front of us, the question is, what should we be doing today? If timeline = #1, there's really nothing we can do. I would say die with dignity and grace at an old age, enjoy your current life with moderation and resignation, and pray that Asia does not follow our example. If timeline = #2, become psychologically and physically able to fight, die, and kill for the cause, constantly tell everyone you know of the coming crisis whites face and our need to unite around new philosophical principles, and then when the facts keep following your prophecies, prove that you were right all along and become a leader of our underground organization and eventual overground government. Have a large family and indoctrinate them all into the cause, single handedly raising the number of soldiers for the cause by multiplying your ideals and your genes. If timeline = #3, support scientific endeavors and research, join in on the research yourself if you are mentally suited to it, ignore the outside world and concentrate on atoms, cells, and the nuts and bolts of infinite power while the kids argue over meaningless things like health care and immigration.
One thing we can't do is preempt the natural playing out of the future. The momentum is simply too fierce, the power of the status quo too immeasurable, to stop the juggernaut from rolling all the way to its intended destiny. Stepping in the way of such a force only means getting crushed underneath it. We must instead watch from the side until the momentum is gone and the wheel has reached the bottom of the hill. It won't be long now, either way, before the status quo turns on itself, and like a snake eating its own tail, becomes all the power necessary to destroy its own limitless power. Just sit back and buy some popcorn, it's going to be a heck of a show.
1. Gradual collapse model. In this model, there is no flash point, there is no 'before and after,' things just generally degrade and wind down to a more sustainable level of poverty and development. This would be much like the end of the Roman Empire and people slowly winding down to feudalism. The manufacturing sector and trade sectors of the economy were abandoned, populations shrank, and everyone took up farming and ground out a miserable existence, isolated from even the nearby villages a few miles away.
For our modern times, it means that as the white population shrinks, more and more of the economy stands on the shoulders of the mexicans and blacks, who shrink the economy to something they can achieve and produce. We will have the economy of Mexico or Columbia or Ghana or something, each year getting slightly worse off until we reach some stable floor that even other races can maintain.
It remains an open question whether Asians will inherit the earth or simply die off like we did, a victim to their own success and prosperity. Asian birth rates are as low as white birth rates, and there is little evidence that they haven't bought into the multicultural dogma -- it is more likely that being poorer, they just haven't been as juicy targets for mass immigration as we have. Their time will soon come after ours, any day now I expect Japan to surrender and open their borders to mass immigration, which will be the East's death knell and probably the saddest day in human history.
Supposing Asians do die off, the sub races of the world would level everything to a much lower order of civilization than anything whites or asians achieved. Then it would be a race against time to see if they evolved into a higher order of Man or the sun blew up and humanity died off. It is quite possible that if, say, Islam took over, that we would be caught in an endless non-evolving cycle that manages to perfectly stop all progress. A 'brave new world' where the system has been ground to a complete halt with no prospect for change. It is also possible that there would be a niche for a new intelligent race to evolve and take over, and with the proper culture of expansionism and self-confidence, could achieve the same goals we had, only much later than we could have achieved them. Only time could tell.
2. Total Collapse Model: Under this theory, the restriction of resources and overpopulation of the earth does not sit well in people's throats, and they resolve to do something about it rather than lay down and die. This would galvanize not only whites and Asians to preserve themselves, but also blacks, Indians, hispanics and all the rest would be clawing at each other's throats for that last scrap of food or oil or shelter. In fact, what we could see is say, food riots among poor urban blacks spreading out into the suburbs where they start butchering and eating the white yuppies around them, followed by an immense backlash of white vigilante justice rounding up and killing black 'savages,' and then the military fissioning across various tribal and philosophical fault lines and an enormous civil war that would be mimicked all across the world -- muslims vs. europeans vs. europeon liberals, elite whites in south america vs. commoner hispanics, russians vs. muslims/turks, indian guest workers vs. saudi overlords, and so on. If conditions become harsh enough, fast enough, that people are shocked by their change in fortune, it could radicalize everyone and let them feel that violence is worth the gamble.
In this constant pressure of poor vs. rich revolutions, race wars, and civil wars, white nationalists could carve out their own living space and fight like badgers to hold onto it as the outside world descends into chaos. With no organized body to resist our move, our greater intellect and higher morale would secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. This would be the best chance for whites, and what we have to be hoping for as America's, and Europe's, future.
Is it possible for the economy to collapse so thoroughly so soon? I think so, and it's based on the idea that most of today's wealth is illusory. If IQ and wealth are closely related like Lynn says, the dysgenic trends around the world are going to show up eventually in our wealth-creating power. If no cheap alternative to fossil fuels can be found, and fossil fuels are depleted in the next few decades, the entire modern economy will come to a grinding halt. If parasites really do outnumber producers, in terms of corporate welfare and poverty welfare, of jewish bankers skimming off the top and black criminals raiding from the bottom, there is no mathematical way for us to end up rich and prosperous. Today's economy is structurally and inherently unstable, floating on bubble after bubble of imagined but not real wealth, living off a future debt we can never repay, and relying on consumers who can't afford anything they buy. If Global Warming is true, much of our living space will become unlivable -- too hot, underwater, or who knows what, adding yet higher costs to everyone's lives.
As each generation of children gets further removed from any sense of family stability, when grandparents and even great grandparents have always been divorced and all children across the board are illegitimate with mothers inviting new boyfriends into the house every other week, all concepts of morality will vanish and life will become a hedonistic storm of manic-depression and short time horizons inimical to child-rearing or economic success. Mental illness, drug use, alcohol abuse, suicides and NEETS will expand exponentially until there is practically no one left to run the country. Collapse will start in the souls of our children and then explode outwards into the 'real world' of jobs and health.
I also predict that in 30 to 50 years, no one will care much about Hitler, Martin Luther King, apartheid, segregation, or the Holocaust. It will all be relegated to the dustbin of history, and as all our studies show, our education courses are so incompetent at teaching history, that no college graduate by then will know what century WWII even occurred in, just like nobody knows what century the Civil War occurred in now. In the face of complete ignorance and no living link to any 'repression' or 'genocide' of minorities (which will sound meaningless to them since whites will be the minority in all countries whites live in and non-whites the majority), whites will be less interested in feeling guilty and more interested in the clear and present abuses and dangers they themselves face every day. World War II was 70 years ago, that already sounds incredibly ancient, sometime just after the thirty years war or the crusades. What about when it was 120 years ago? Is anyone going to be mentioning WWII every two seconds as their proof of every argument then? We may as well mention Hannibal crossing the Alps or the battle at Avincourt.
Therefore the total collapse model will involve a total collapse of the economy, a total collapse of today's popular culture and priorities, a total collapse of the family, a total collapse of the environment, a total collapse of racial and ethnic and religious harmony (think of the sudden massacre by the hutus against the tutsis), and a total collapse of the world's population (which I also predict, in this scheme, will have skyrocketed to something like 12 or 15 billion, not the rosy 9 billion of the UN, which predicts that magically, blacks will get their reproduction rates under control.) With so many things falling apart, it will become possible for new worlds to be built. Those with the most will to power will emerge at the top in a collapsed world, just as today the most mealy mouthed suck up lying scum are best situated to wealth and high status today. When environments change, 'survival of the fittest' also changes. Racism may not be suitable to 'get ahead' today, but tomorrow it will be the only game in town.
3. Technological Singularity: Under this theory we avoid all the current issues by simply inventing our way out of it. Suppose we invent a new food source 100 times as efficient as all current ones. We invent a new power source that solves global warming and provides infinite free energy for everyone. We invent computers to do all our thinking for us so it doesn't matter what our IQ is anymore. We invent robots to raise our children and care for our elderly, and so on. Or we discover the key to immortality, can genetically engineer ourselves to be super smart, super pretty and super well behaved at all times. There is boundless power within science to change any aspect of our lives. Once we cross the threshold of a technological singularity (wherein one invention leads to the next which leads to the next in a chain reaction we can no longer stop or avoid, pulling us into the center of a new science world we can't even imagine today like a whirlpool), it doesn't matter what was going on within humanity before. It doesn't matter what we do now, what happened in the past, or what we'll be doing in the future as the technology begins to cascade -- it becomes a force of its own, perhaps even supplanting our existence with sentient machines or bacterial colonies or superhumans.
Someday science fiction will become science fact. So long as we continue discovering and inventing, we always approach closer to the day of technological singularity. Our video games have already incorporated motion sensing virtual reality technology. Our computer chips are already reaching the atomic scale. And so on. Before we know it, we'll have passed the event horizon and humanity will become a footnote. People are constantly warning about the perils of this technology or that one, it's hard to believe that when you look at the vast array of technologies, all of which contain their own cataclysmic perils, we'll be able to avoid them all. One invention or another is going to change reality forever, and it is simply too enticing to avoid them all, given how many benefits each one yields.
Of course, this is just one possible timeline, I'm not saying it's inevitable, just that this is how it would come about, if this timeline were the future.
Conclusion: So with all this spread out in front of us, the question is, what should we be doing today? If timeline = #1, there's really nothing we can do. I would say die with dignity and grace at an old age, enjoy your current life with moderation and resignation, and pray that Asia does not follow our example. If timeline = #2, become psychologically and physically able to fight, die, and kill for the cause, constantly tell everyone you know of the coming crisis whites face and our need to unite around new philosophical principles, and then when the facts keep following your prophecies, prove that you were right all along and become a leader of our underground organization and eventual overground government. Have a large family and indoctrinate them all into the cause, single handedly raising the number of soldiers for the cause by multiplying your ideals and your genes. If timeline = #3, support scientific endeavors and research, join in on the research yourself if you are mentally suited to it, ignore the outside world and concentrate on atoms, cells, and the nuts and bolts of infinite power while the kids argue over meaningless things like health care and immigration.
One thing we can't do is preempt the natural playing out of the future. The momentum is simply too fierce, the power of the status quo too immeasurable, to stop the juggernaut from rolling all the way to its intended destiny. Stepping in the way of such a force only means getting crushed underneath it. We must instead watch from the side until the momentum is gone and the wheel has reached the bottom of the hill. It won't be long now, either way, before the status quo turns on itself, and like a snake eating its own tail, becomes all the power necessary to destroy its own limitless power. Just sit back and buy some popcorn, it's going to be a heck of a show.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)