Why a White Homeland?

Whenever I propose a White Homeland as the cure to all our ills, I'm afraid it sounds rather shallow.

There are plenty of white countries around the world, some are still up to 97% white -- and yet none of them are well off. Arguably, America is freer, richer, and healthier than they are -- and this at just a 60% white population. Why would simply increasing the percentage of whites in our country make us better off?

The answer, of course, is it wouldn't. The % of whites in your country is a necessary, but not a sufficient element for a utopia.

An all white nation would be a nice refreshing change from the bizarre aliens and strangers who surround us today, but truth to say, even a 90% white nation, with a good culture, is far better than a 100% white nation with a bad culture. The main benefit to an all white nation is being around people like yourself -- people who share your sense of aesthetics, people who share your values and morality, people who share your history and genealogy. It's good to be affirmed and loved for who you are, rather than rejected and despised. Now, this implies some sort of relativistic values system where it doesn't matter what we believe, only that we all agree on it. That's not what I mean. The race-soul of a people calls out for a belief system perfect for itself -- our genes cry out for a self-expression, a culture, that embodies our nature, that fulfills our natural wants. In the end, there is an ideal world for everyone, and that ideal world is much closer in nature between related genes than unrelated genes. Therefore, an artificial consensus simply imposed on people through brainwashing, peer pressure or government force doesn't please anyone. Nor can a natural consensus be derived from disparate elements. We are born Republican and Democrat, Religious and Atheist, and so on. (Don't take my word for it, read Rushton's Race, Evolution, and Behavior, that discovers our personality and beliefs are also influenced by heredity ie genes.)

Basically, when you see a group of people in disagreement, the best answer will almost always be to separate. Convincing people against their own instincts and feelings is not a long-term solution, nor is forcing them to ape the behavior we see as natural and good. Someone will always end up unhappy. Even in marriage, the best predictor that the marriage will be a happy one is how similar they are -- in education levels, wealth, looks, beliefs, and so on. An equally valid measure is to simply ask how genetically related they are, since all the previous things are hereditable. The closer people are related, the more likely they are to get along. Families are closer than normal because of how similar the people in the family are to each other -- not because of some magical bonding process that works just as well for step-children or adopted children. That's the gene-denialists position, that family love is an artificial construct and can be mimicked by unrelated people equally well. Standing in the face of this are the cold facts, like rates of child abuse twenty times as high when the father isn't related to the kids, or the fact that two adopted children make different sorts of friends and gravitate to different social circles, based on their different innate genes, even if they themselves have learned to get along. Most shocking, in twin adoption studies, twins separated by adoption at birth are more similar in personality and beliefs, than the same twins to their adoptive parents.

A nation will also feel 'closer,' more loving, more affirming and supportive to its people if they are more closely related. A nation should be a breeding ground for a certain type of soul, one that feels at home in that nation, who wouldn't have it any other way. What happened in every white country on Earth, however, whether it's 50% white or 97% white, is the same curse: It's been irredeemably judaized. An alien culture has supplanted the natural race-soul and the national 'home' of whites. Its values, aesthetics, looks, and beliefs have all been imposed by people outside of them. An alien culture has invaded and conquered everyone equally, whether the aliens actually live there or not. So all white homelands are equally badly off, because they've all uncritically accepted the same judaic nonsense as the USA. Christianity? Judaic nonsense. Multiculturalism? Judaic nonsense. Hollywood? Judaic nonsense. Materialism? Judaic nonsense. Tolerance? Judaic nonsense.

Take for example classical art versus modern art. Classical art is the expression of the European race soul, what Europeans when left to themselves decide to draw and sculpt and look at. Then jews came from somewhere or other, established themselves as the professors of art and art critics and controlled the newspapers that extolled all jewish aesthetics while denouncing all European aesthetics. Soon enough, Europeans had lost control of their own art and their tastes were being browbeaten into them by the authority figures at the top. The woeful herd nature of most humans, and their woefully low IQ in comparison to the Jewish invaders, made it hopeless to resist this sudden revolution. A revolution in taste that has sat sourly on our tongues ever since -- that we cannot quite express or explain, but makes us unhappy every day it lasts. The same with switching out the European styles of music with the jewish record labels that now control the music industry. Or the classical and gothic architecture with the jewish modern architecture, which always looks terrible -- but we have lost the ability to express what our architecture should look like, or why exactly we dislike how buildings are today. It's the same for our literature -- a Canon chosen by jews is quite different from the Canon chosen by Europeans. Our Founding Fathers, for instance, were reading Greek and Latin classics -- while our education consists of reading various PC tales about how wrong it is to discriminate. Recently the jews even had the chutzpah to make all high schoolers read "Riding the Bus with my Sister," where we learn all about the life of a retarded jewess ((Literally, I'm not kidding.), and presumably learn to feel oh so much sympathy and love for her. When jews write our canon and jews choose our canon, we will begin to hate reading and literature in general, it will make us unhappy to even be in school. The expressions of our European race soul, Dostoeveskey, Dickens, or Gibbon, rot in some corner while two bit hacks like To Kill a Mockingbird are read day in and day out.

A White Homeland would be distinct from a country which just happens to be white. The enormous, humongous, stupendous difference, would be that for the first time, we take control of our culture and design it to be by and for White people. We will scientifically zero in on what appeals, aesthetically, to white people. What is good WHITE art, as it were, what suits us most naturally, what makes our inner hearts sing. And then we will give it to our people. There will be a light step in our citizens, a sort of un-placeable happiness, where people can't even define why they have such nice days. But it will be everywhere, the expression of their race soul, the expression of the very best inside them, elevating and extolling them -- the buildings, the books, the music wafting on the wind, the store windows, the clothes we wear, can you imagine how many little things, how many little influences there are? The gilding on our silverware, the designs on our sheets -- there is room for art everywhere -- and each time there is a chance for it to be art that appeals to whites, that appeals to whites' whiteness, or art that appeals to jews, and forces whites to act and think like jews. (Or blacks, hispanics, asians, etc, if they were in power.)

It's not just our chance to recapture our art forms however. Just as vitally, we can teach history from a white perspective. We can create a white nobility, people who are exceptional at 'being white,' who have in spades the virtues we value in a person. Not money, not cunning, not anything jewish. If you want to look at a European virtue system, look back to Plato -- Courage, Justice, Wisdom, and Temperance. A nobility such as that, who could object to their rule? Where in modern society do our elected officials ever possess anything remotely similar to these virtues? It's easy enough to identify the seeds of these virtues on the playground, and it would be easy enough to continue promoting the kids who keep passing our tests, to enter that nobility. A true class of shepherds, who earn their rank every generation, rather than predators whose cunning, greed, and criminality are legend. Politicians are among the least trusted or respected classes -- why should it have to be that way? Because our race-soul was polluted and the culture that worked for thousands of years -- the ideals of the nobility and the aristocracy, were overturned by the jewish-communist belief in universal democracy. Even when the US Republic was founded, only around 1/4 of the people could vote in it. The same was true of England and other countries well into the 1900's. But the general creep of democratic-communism (where power is distributed equally regardless of merit) was definitely pushed by non-whites, who did not represent the instincts of the white race-soul.

It's obvious that there were faults in hereditary rule, and these faults were honestly addressed by people like Machiavelli, Montesquieu, and others. Sadly, these same people honestly critiqued democracy and held moderate positions on what we could do about the faults found in monarchies. When we return from the blight of democracy to the clean and pure air of the nobility, we can leave the faults of the past behind. Children inheriting power they did not merit, tyrants abusing their subjects, parasites collecting rent but not actually administering justice or defending the realm. Things like this are abuses of the system, they are not innate to it -- there were plenty of reigns by Good Kings and Good Emperors, golden ages of mankind. The art of choosing leaders who will always deliver like a Hadrian is simply a matter of scientific testing and training, it's impossible to believe that out of a pool of millions of candidates, no one is suited to the position or can succeed at it.

We can devote our money to the causes of the white race-soul. Particularly, our faustian curiosity and love of Truth. Rather than feeding Africa or converting people to Jesus worship, our charity can be to science projects. Like super-colliders, telescopes, fusion power, space travel, self-driven cars, stem cells, genetic engineering -- anything that catches our fancy. Again, the difference between a White Homeland, and a country full of whites, is for the first time ever, we can actually devote ourselves to ourselves. Not to outsiders, not to outside ideologies, but to our inner cores. It was whites who invented the scientific method -- we invented it, not anyone else -- and it's because science is what we're suited for. It's what we Should be doing. If there isn't a revolutionary science project being cooked up, if there isn't an enormous goal we are shooting for, our society grows pensive, lax, and weak. Whether it's the interstate highway system, landing on the moon within the decade, or sequencing the Human Genome, whites are at their best when the nation is pooled together chasing an exciting dream.

It took one year to build the Empire State Building. One year. Whites can do great things, when they're inspired to do great things, simply because they are great.

The so called 'Freedom Tower,' still doesn't have a single story or inch of scaffolding up. It's been 8 years. It's pathetic. This is what happens when the wind is taken out of our sails, when we aren't inspired to do anything but feed Africans or embrace immigrants. We never get anything DONE. We as a people are no longer DOING anything. The most aimless generation ever.

A White Homeland would be our first chance, as we are founding a new nation, to install an entirely new set of values and norms. A country full of whites, through sheer momentum, is stuck in a rut, a rut of accepted laws and customs, that it's impossible to break out of. For instance, the idea that women should have the right to choose who they marry, or even whether they marry at all. For the longest time, this was not a part of white culture -- it came from elsewhere. I honestly don't know where it came from. What I do know, is that the result is a societal wasteland headed for extinction. But it cannot be stopped, the momentum is simply too fierce. Women will not give up their right to hedonism and careerism, in countries where those rights have been long established, and children are raised expecting to have them as the norm. White women in the past were raised with the knowledge that they were meant to marry, have, and rear children. Since so many children died, they would commonly have to bear 10 children just to end up with two. It was hard work, it was a lifelong task. And these marriages were arranged by their parents -- women were generally asked for consent, but they weren't expected to go courting themselves, or to be the ones choosing their mates. They accepted these 'harsh' and 'slave-like' laws because that was just the way it was. It wasn't questioned or challenged, so they had no idea that they should question or challenge it. They had no idea they were living as 'sex-slaves.' For them, they were living a life of honor and virtue, they were making their family proud, and they were obeying God.

Based on people's perspectives, the same conditions can be terrible or gratifying and fulfilling. If we recast marriage as a duty and a privilege, if married women with children are the highest status women can have, they will accept it just as cheerfully as their predecessors did. But if we stay in the same old country, some 97% white country of today, all of its culture and institutions will make such a demand impossible. Women simply aren't geared to think like this anymore. I expect the whole sorry tale will play itself out to the very end, the spiraling death of the West, in all these 'countries full of whites,' because women will never give up their current privileged state -- and democracy will never be able to vote them out of said privileged state. It will take a new nation, a clean break, with clearly different priorities, to start at a healthier point. It isn't the number of whites that makes a white homeland, but how pro-white the nation is. A white homeland is a homeland designed to be pro-white, a homeland that is designed for whites to prosper and thrive in.

In a White Homeland, the environment can be protected up to OUR standards, not littered on and overcrowded and defiled by swarms of Indian, Chinese, Hispanic, or African slums. Whites love their mountains and moors, their forests and their rivers. We have a right to enjoy them the way God intended us to enjoy them. We have a right to wide open spaces. We have a right to a small population occupying a vast open countryside. Why? Because we are so productive with the land we use, that a country of a thousand whites is better than ten million blacks crammed cheek by jowl in the same space. Furthermore, after all we've given humanity -- from the car to the computer to the steam engine to Michelangelo to the very green revolution that allowed them to multiply their population endlessly -- we can claim any amount of land we please and we'd have earned it and more. We have a right to the land, we have a right to be the only ones on said land, and we have a right to have as many or as few children as we please on said land. To reach an equilibrium that suits US, our race-soul. Not thirty people to an apartment, not people sleeping in shifts on the same bed, not working hours for nickels because our jobs are always at risk by the hungry unemployed outside our doors who'd work for pennies.

Since countries full of whites have no immigration control, they can not protect their environment, their economy, their workers or their rights. A White Homeland would be different -- even if it had a smaller percentage of whites! By having the self assertiveness, by having white pride, by being pro-white, it would keep the country white, at the population we like, forever. Not for a couple more generations before the shoe drops -- not until we die of old age -- forever.

There isn't a single aspect of life, that couldn't be made better by designing the laws, the system, to better suit our natures. In a universalist country that intends to be 'fair' or 'balanced' towards all parties, of course the system can't be designed to benefit anyone. It would have to appeal equally to completely different people with completely different wants and needs. The more variety we input into a country, the more strained a government is to serve all its citizens equally. Eventually it becomes impossible and the state descends into civil war, but in the meantime, everyone equally is miserable. Muslims feel the country isn't suited enough to muslims, jews don't feel it is suited to jews, blacks don't feel it's suited to blacks, hispanics don't feel it's suited to hispanics, Asians don't feel it's suited to Asians, Indians don't feel it's suited to Indians, and Whites don't feel it's suited to Whites. And guess what? It isn't! It isn't suited to anyone! In a dreadful chimera such as the United States, with the heads of goats, lions, and snakes all mixed together into a single flame and poison belching body, there is no way even a single group can possibly be satisfied by the laws, looks, and feel of the whole. We can do much better than this. In every field in life, suiting it to our particular, not our universal nature, will always make it fit and feel better -- just like tailored suits! Countries full of whites, are still designed from a universal viewpoint. A White Homeland, is designed from a particularist viewpoint -- what is good for whites? What is the deepest expression of the European race-soul? The country that lives as the embodiment and answer to that question will be our utopia.

Could Atlas Shrugged Work Today?

Speaking of Ayn Rand, what of the Atlas Shrugged model of revolution? Is it more or less feasible than the Harold Covington model? More or less feasible than the Turner Diaries?

The essential premise of Atlas Shrugged is that without a small group of elites working night and day to advance and uphold modern civilization, it would all very quickly devolve back into the Dark Ages. The infrastructure would decay right alongside the philosophy, the technology would reverse right alongside people's virtue. Simply by stepping aside for a brief moment, elites could make their point to the astonished masses about how necessary they were, who would then beg for the elites to come back and set things right on the elite's terms. After this brief strike of the elites, civilization would return and the people would forevermore be grateful towards their betters.

This is hopelessly optimistic thinking. There are a million holes I can poke into this theory, but the first one that comes to mind is that Mexico is not currently in the Dark Ages. China went full blown communist, and yet it did not enter the dark ages. Heck, even Nigeria isn't in the dark ages anymore. The fact is, even in a horribly run society, infrastructure and technology can be maintained indefinitely. Cuba may be putting around in 1950's cars, but it is in fact still driving cars around. A torturous existence, worse than nothing, a net negative life, can be maintained indefinitely, sometimes it falls (like the USSR), but sometimes it doesn't. What if the elites went on strike, and people just struggled through it, soldiered on, and lived in wretched but stable conditions forever?

The next question is why would the elites ever rebel? They're the ones rolling in wealth, status, and power. It makes no sense for elites to have any qualms with present day society. Sure, in Atlas Shrugged, communism made it impossible for the elites to get ahead, but today's model is not communism, it's a plutocracy. People with money make the campaign donations that elect the politicians of their choosing. Said politicians turn around and give cushy favors and taxpayer dollars to the rich businessmen who supported them. Rinse, cycle, repeat. Elites, the money aristocracy, have no reason to bite the hand that feeds them. Today in America, the top 1% have a larger share of America's wealth than anytime in the last century at least. They are getting more powerful, richer, not weaker or poorer. It is the same for Mexico or any other tin-pot dictatorship. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer -- the poor never rule in any of these places. Though communism might be inherently unstable, plutocracies are extremely stable. The powerful are already in power, and they use their power to ensure they will stay in power. It's not that difficult a concept to maintain.

Plus, the elites of Atlas Shrugged thought too highly of themselves. There are more than enough smart people to fill all leadership roles in business, art, science, and government. Just look at the resumes of some of these high schoolers being rejected by Harvard. Perfect SAT's, 4.0 GPA's, tons of extra-curricular awards and olympiads, straight 5's on their AP tests. There is a vast, untapped sea of talent that our job market simply can't or won't support. Many of these people end up janitors or clerks because there is simply nothing society will pay them to do. If a thousand 'elites' whisked away one day to a secluded village in Colorado, ten million equally qualified elites, or barely less qualified elites, would be scrambling to get into those jobs, and would fulfill them just as well as the previous holders, or close enough to just as well, that nobody could tell the difference. There are more people with law degrees than can get law jobs, more people with engineering degrees than can get engineering jobs, and more people with science degrees than can get research grants. As technology improves, this situation will only get worse. Imagine some genius invents an easier coding language that makes it ten times as fast and simple to make a new computer program. What will happen to all the computer science majors who made a living writing code? You guessed it, nine in ten will be fired. In a world of massive unemployment, it's impossible for a strike to succeed. The same innovations in farming that reduced farm workers from 90% of the population to 1%, the same innovations in manufacturing that replaced blue collar workers with automated machines, will sooner or later replace high-end thinking jobs as well. Machines will be better at proscribing diseases based on people's symptoms than doctors, for instance (because their memory can be enormous and it never fails)-- they will also be better at performing the surgery. (Machines' hands don't shake and they don't get tired.)

The truth is, a human being is lucky to get a job, any job, in the world of today. Far from people needing our work, mental or physical, all essential jobs were filled eons ago, and most of what people do is worthless make-work. Vanity jobs that achieve nothing but our own self-esteem. For instance, anyone who makes less than 10 dollars an hour may as well not even work -- their work is so worthless it obviously shouldn't be done in the first place. Anyone receiving their money from the government is equally worthless work -- if the private market found no use for the job, then the job has no use period. For the last twenty or so years, however, these are the only two areas where job growth occurred -- shit jobs and endlessly inflated bureaucracies. In France it's something like for the last FIFTY years there hasn't been a single new job made in the private sector. After all, how much work is there really left to do in a society full of computers and machines?

The Industrial Revolution figured out how a single person working with a machine could make a thousand times as much cloth/needles/etc than the economy could the day before. Suppose people really wanted 20 times as many clothes as they currently had -- that would still require 49/50 of all textile workers to be laid off. The steam engine meant all manual labor became worthless, and a single liter of oil can generate as much work as 2400 hours of manual labor (or some ridiculous number like that, the point is the same regardless.) Farm labor, mining labor, all labor is now redundant.

But setting this aside, let's assume that all the elites at once went on strike, and they did this out of an idealistic urge to see the triumph of truth and justice, and no amount of money, wealth, or status could divert them from this sacred cause. The revolution would still fail. Why? I present to you South Africa!

In South Africa, blacks have managed to destroy their infrastructure, become the most violent country on Earth, infect around 1/4 of the population with the lethal AIDS virus, and in general dive directly back into the Dark Ages. Have they repented of their mistakes? Have they asked for whites, the elites, to take back over and set it all straight again? Have they learned the error of their ways? Has suffering made them realize that their betters really do deserve power? Of course not. Because hatred and envy are far more powerful emotions than self-interest or greed. Blacks would rather die than admit they were wrong. They would rather starve to death or die of AIDS than see a white person back in power. They would rather anarchy prevail than white men impose law and order. The whole dream that people will 'come to their senses' if you just let them suffer a while is again, hopeless naivety. As though communists were ever interested in material well being. As though communists' one goal hasn't always been to tear down their betters and destroy, out of pure envy, anything they themselves could not create. Communists, South Africa, is now better off than before. According to the human heart, it is better to be the King of Hell, than the servant of Heaven. King of a Dunghill, over lapdog of a Palace.

The real ending of Atlas Shrugged should have been something like this, "John Galt makes his speech, the government tells him to piss off, everything wrong about today is due to the legacy of capitalism, and everything will be perfect soon enough, the people agree and vote in yet another communist democratically for the next election, ad naseum." Do you really think people are reasonable? That people are intelligent? Only one in a thousand people are as intelligent John Galt's target audience. Only one in a thousand people even have sufficient grasp of the English language, sufficient capacity for logic, to even understand what he is saying. Even if they all agreed with him, it wouldn't change a thing. The envy and hatred of the remaining 999/1,000ths would simply tear us all limb from limb.

A revolt by the elites, for the elites, is a non-starter. It cannot happen.

Look at all the successful revolutions in the past 300 years! The Russian Revolution, done in the name of the poor -- Peace, Land, Bread. The French Revolution, done in the name of the poor -- Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. The American Revolution, done in the name of the middle class -- Life, Liberty, and Property. The Cuban revolution, Che Guevera and all that crap. Mao's revolution with his little red book, declaring peasants to be the true proletariat. And the National Socialist revolution, that proclaimed: Ein Reich, Ein Volk, Ein Fuhrer! Has there ever been a libertarian revolution in history? No. Has any successful revolution tried to appeal to the rich? No. Has every successful revolution been populist? Yes. Should we also bear a populist revolutionary message? YES! Who could have ever imagined a mass movement based on the one in a thousand intellectual and his right to amass wealth into an ever-more-concentrated singularity? The right for J.P. Morgan to own the world. Oh, sure! Let's all rally behind this! I can hear the pitchforks gathering now!

Whether we succeed or fail, it is clear what our slogan must be, the only slogan that has the tiniest sliver of a chance at success, something as simple and populist and broad and appealing and welcoming as the slogans that came before:

We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.

A revolution that anyone with a clean soul can accept and be a part of. A community that looks down on no one, cuts through all class divides, and tells someone they can have a purpose, a place, in our community however humble they might be. That all they are required do to be our equal, all they are required to do to be our comrade, our brothers -- is fight for the homeland. The white homeland our children can run and play in without fear. The white homeland with white picket fences and blonde flowing hair and white wedding dresses and peaceful white doves and pure white rainbows floating in the sky! This is it! This is the place you belong! This is where you can truly be someone! This is the future you were indispensable for making come true! This is the grave we will always, always, gather by, remember and honor -- every year a memorial to the independence you won will sing and surge through the line of your descendants for a thousand generations. God bless such a life! God bless such a death! God bless such a cause!

Now, a slightly different question might be asked: If Atlas Shrugged can't possibly be a blueprint for our revolution, could it still be our blueprint for living before the revolution? For instance, would it be wise to stop working, so that our tax dollars no longer support this Zionist Occupied Goverment? Would it be wise to stop marrying, until the marriage laws of old are returned and adultery and divorce banned? Would it be wise to stop voting, because democracy is a sham and doesn't deserve an ounce of legitimacy? Would it be wise to stop listening to the Television, because you know everything it says will always and only, ever be lies? Would it be wise to refuse to have children, because their fate outside our Homeland is a fate worse than death, and we should never bring another child onto the earth until we finally have a safe place to raise them again? Would it be wise to stop volunteering for the army, because this nation no longer deserves to be defended? Would it be wise to stop giving to charity, because no one has spared us any charity in ages? Would it be wise to stop attending church, since all they ever preach is poison?

This question is nettlesome. Yes, by completely withdrawing from the outside world, by completely withholding your services from the world, you help to weaken its foundations. At the same time, you weaken us even more. If we don't have children, who will teach racism to the next generation? If we don't make money, who will fund our revolution? If we don't join the army, who will know how to fight? If we don't live and act like winners, who will be convinced we are? So there are arguments for both sides. I still think the best thing to do in this inverted, insane world, is become rich, marry, and have lots of kids. We don't know when, or if, the revolution will ever get off the ground. It may not occur during our lifetime. In which case, we will have to lead normal everyday lives, our entire lives. The thought is disgusting, it's traumatic, but there it is. Someone has to carry the torch onwards to the next generation. For anyone in a position to do so, what can I say? Duty is heavier than a mountain, death is as light as a feather.

Tyranny:

According to Ayn Rand's masterpiece, We the Living, the three choices a human being has in the face of tyranny are 1) Kill yourself, 2) Kill your mind, 3) or Leave.

America is in the grip of a tyranny just as bad as communism, in fact worse than Soviet Russia. Soviet Russia, despite grinding its people down as much as it could, never imagined importing a new race of people into the country in order to genocide the native inhabitants. That was an innovation of the West. America took the lead in waging war against its own people through complete and total race-replacement immigration. America is in fact the worst government in human history, the most evil government to have ever lived. Even though China killed 35 million Chinese, they never imagined killing off all Chinese, or replacing Chinese with negroes after the slaughter was done. America, however, has taken an entire continent of whites and thrown it to the wolves. Not only the 200 million or so whites currently living in America, but all the whites who will never be born on our once mighty continent -- larger than Europe and thus holding the greatest potential as the cradle of the white race -- have been murdered forever. It is a crime of unspeakable magnitude, a tyranny beyond any bearing.

This insane behavior has been papered over by a paper-thin excuse, that all people are interchangeable parts, that it doesn't matter who exists and who doesn't, that white people have no reason to live anyway -- and that therefore killing off all whites and replacing them all with browns is not, in fact, a crime. This paper thin excuse does not work -- if people truly believed we were all interchangeable parts, you would not see the segregation of the races that everyone personally chooses in their private lives. The friends they make, the church they attend, the neighborhood they live in, the race they marry, all of it innately rebels against the theory that everyone is the same and interchangeable. Race matters. It matters to everyone. The race around whom we live is one of the most pivotal factors for human happiness possible.

What we are seeing then is not that the excuse is working, all people immediately see through it and declare it false in their own lives. Instead, the excuse is more subtle. People imagine that even though they happen to be racist, that the mythical person 'out there,' 'somewhere,' leads a completely multicultural, multiracial existence, just like the excuse says we should. These people, constantly portrayed in the media and tv shows and movies as absolutely loving diversity and always having a black 'best friend,' and a black 'boyfriend/girlfriend,' must be the majority. So each white individual assumes he is in the minority, and that even though the system does not work for him, it must work grandly for everyone else, or else why would the media have so many shows about it? This placates him, in essence, the white person 'takes one for the team.' The very collectivist loyalty that proves the theory of multiculturalism a lie, allows him to suffer for the greater good of all his white contemporaries who apparently all love diversity and can't have enough of it.

Next, the paper thin excuse is enforced in the same way Communism was enforced in Russia -- you never know when you are being spied on, who will betray you, who is the informer in your circle of friends -- you never know when it is safe to tell the truth. The fact is, everyone is a racist. We are born racist, we are born preferring our race, we are even born hating and fearing people of other races. We are attracted to people like ourselves and hate people who aren't like us. This evolved naturally because anyone who didn't feel these emotions, had no incentive to further their collective gene pool, and lost in competition with those who were enthusiastic pushers of their own collective gene pool. Evolution has so hard wired racism into everyone's brains, that this IN ITSELF proves racism is necessary for survival. That everyone who isn't racist, has already long gone extinct. It also proves that anyone who isn't racist today, is also destined for extinction. It is as suicidal to ignore this natural urge, as it is to stop breathing, eating, or reproducing, in some demented belief that we should 'rise above our instincts' and 'be better than our animal selves.'

So when people gather in a group and denounce racism, it isn't because a single person there believes it. It's because all of them are terrified of being singled out as the racist in the group and attacked by their peers. Their peers, likewise, are terrified when a friend or family member announces they are racist, for fear of guilt by association. They will then denounce in the loudest and most scathing tones their former friend or family member, in order to escape the tar brush of being implicated alongside their erstwhile intimate with the same crime. If you don't join in the attack on your peers, you will join in being attacked by your peers. Therefore we have a foolproof system, where everyone is actually racist, and yet no one can either be a racist or tolerate a racist in their midst.

How has racism become such a terrifying charge? Well, sometime around the 1950's, racism was blamed for slavery, the Holocaust, murder, war, poverty, and every other activity humans find repellent. If racists were responsible for everything that had ever gone wrong in human history, no one wanted to be a racist. There was even a on-the-surface good argument for this theory: The people who took slaves, genocided jews, murdered blacks in lynch mobs, invaded other people's lands, denied people jobs or services, so on and so forth -- WERE ALL RACISTS. This is proof positive that racism is the root of all evil, is it not? But of course it isn't, because they could just have easily said the people who did all those things all believed in breathing, or eating, and that therefore breathers and eaters are the root of all evil. By creating a false correlation between racism and evil (all good acts as well as evil acts were also done by racists), people decided that racism must be the ultimate evil and racists the darkest force in the universe. Just like the Soviets blamed everything on reactionaries and kulaks, today we are told that everything would be perfect if not for all the racists in our midst. Of course, since racism is as natural as breathing and eating, and since racism can only end when a group of people loses all wish to survive and dies just as soon as anti-breathers or anti-eaters would die, there will always be racists to blame for people's woes. Just like self-interest is as natural as breathing or eating, and self-interest will only end when a group loses all survival value and dies, and thus there will always be 'reactionaries' and 'kulaks' available for the Soviet Union to blame.

This game of first identifying a trait that everyone is born with, then blaming this trait for all evil that has ever happened, while ignoring the obvious good it must do for it to have evolved in humans in the first place, then attacking people for possessing this trait, is a tool of tyranny. There could be no better process for a tyranny to keep power than to make people feel guilty for possessing a trait they cannot help but have.

The truth is racism is not only the source of war, genocide, crime, oppression, and all that jazz. Racism is also the source of love, community, altruism, security, prosperity, meaning, identity, purpose, and pride. Racism is an absolute necessity in life and anyone who lacks it suffers and dies within a geological eyeblink. Scientific studies have already verified that people who take pride in their race are happier than those who do not. History has already shown what happens to any country that abandons its own people to foreigners (slavery and death). Putnam has already proven in his book 'Bowling Alone' what happens to the community life in the face of diversity. The very biology of the human being, our love for those related to us and fear of those unrelated to us, has the genetic stamp of approval of God almighty, our creator, evolution, that put it there for a reason. By piling all the sins of racism at racism's feet, while completely denying any of its benefits -- by ignoring the fact that racism like any other instinct can be abused -- that obesity does not mean eating is wrong, nor does hyperventilating prove breathing is wrong -- it has been possible to completely distort the argument to the point that racism is inexcusable and absolutely evil.

How do people deal with the fact that they discover themselves to be completely racist in all their decisions, while also believing that racism is absolutely evil? There is a lot of Orwellian doublethink. People pretend they are avoiding a 'culture,' or a 'bad environment,' when in fact all they are ever avoiding is non-whites. Then there are people who don't make any excuses for themselves, and feel miserable and guilty every day of their lives, self-flagellating themselves in private and public over how racist they are and how they cannot exorcise this inner demon. Then there are the people who manage to find one person they can relate to outside of their race, and thus pride themselves with clearly not being racist, while living in a white neighborhood, going to a white church, married to a white, with 9 out of 10 white friends, and so on. The schemes are various and multitudinous, but it all boils down to living a lie.

Living a lie is humiliating, it breaks the human spirit, it's degenerate. The results are swift and terrible. People who lived a lie in communist Russia fell to drinking, drug use, and the clearest of all symptoms of spiritual despair -- refusing to reproduce. Russia therefore has a third world standard of living among a first world people. They have been destroyed, annihilated, by living a lie, by living under the tyranny of a lie, by being made to feel guilty for who they are, by being forced to rebel against nature and reality, which made us the way we are for a reason. Now look at America and Europe -- alcohol and drugs used to be legal in our countries, there was even heroine available for consumption by all and sundry -- and yet not many people abused it. There were around 100,000 drug addicts in the entire United States when drugs were banned in the 1920's-1940's, less than 1% of the population. Now drugs, which we vigorously persecute and control with millions of law enforcement agents, are being used routinely by around 40% of the population. Alcohol used to be served to kids regularly and drunk every day by the peasants and nobility alike. They never had a problem with alcoholics like we do today, even with all our attempts to control alcohol consumption and keep it away from kids. The bars and New Year's Day celebrations of Russia and Britain today were never imagined by the rudest peasants of Russia or Britain of the 1800's.

Russia and the West have experienced convergent evolution. Even though different environmental factors were being applied to them, both peoples have adapted in the same way. The response to tyranny is always the same -- kill yourself, kill your mind, or leave. The response to feeling guilty, to living a lie, to being humiliated and ashamed, is always the same -- kill yourself, kill your mind, or leave. Both Russia and Europe has had a great exodus of people escaping to the far corners of the Earth. But there is another way to 'leave,' and that is not have children. If children are not born, they will effectively 'leave' this society, as will you, in time. People who can't bring themselves to commit suicide, can silently make sure they will not live in any sense of the word in the future, that no part of them will still exist to be oppressed and abused in the future. The birth rate of a people is a clear sign of their happiness, their spiritual health. When people feel confident and happy with themselves, they go on to have large families, like the baby boom after WWII. When they feel insecure and depressed, they have small families or none at all. This is where we stand today, and for the last 30 years this is where the West has stood. It is the greatest die off in our history. Worse than the black plague. Both Russia and Europe are killing their minds, they are rife with alcohol and drugs. Both Russia and Europe are killing themselves, suicide is much higher in modern life than it ever was in the 1800's or earlier, when people ostensibly had much lower living standards than today. It is spiritual health, mental health, not physical health, that determines suicide rates. Our technology has made us prosper materially, but nothing has nurtured our souls for a long time. The results should have been obvious as to what would happen if we rejected Nature and reality in favor of lies and tyranny, they are now clear from the simple facts of life all around us -- we are living in Hell and most of the West has already given up rather than live in it any longer.

Another way for people to 'leave' a tyrannical world, is to simply retreat into a tiny hole where the outside world can no longer touch them. Monasticism, secular style. These people feel completely alienated from the world, want nothing to do with it, and are in pain whenever they do have to interact with it. To divert their minds, they watch TV, play video games, read books, who knows what. Anything that doesn't involve the outside world is fine by them. These are the NEET's (Not in Education, Employment or Training.) and there are millions of them. People love to blame the victims, the NEET's themselves, for the phenomena of their existence, just as people love to blame suicides, alcoholics, and drug users for their choices, and yet it's obvious that it cannot be the individuals to blame. If the phenomena were all due to the failings and weakness of individuals, then the rates shouldn't change over the centuries, the same amount of people should have these failings and weaknesses every generation -- unless you can provide some sort of biological explanation for how one generation can be completely genetically unique, across the board, from all the generations that came before them who lacked these weaknesses. The alternative explanation, that society, the environment, has so drastically changed, that people who would have lived ordinary healthy lives in the past, are now driven to become NEET's, druggies, alcoholics, childless couples, or suicides, is the only explanation for this sudden upsurge in self-destruction.

Racism cannot possibly be to blame for societal self-immolation, as racism is always directed outwards against others, not inwards against one's own. In fact, it is the very lack of racism that is to blame for all of this. Racism is a society's immune system. It protects us against selfish individuals (cancer cells) from within, and from foreign invaders (viruses) from without. Just as there can be auto-immune disorders, racism can sometimes over leap its bounds and cause more harm than good -- look at the petty ethnic interests that sparked World War I and World War II for instance. But a total collapse of the immune system is not the solution to auto-immune disorders. Allowing selfish people to run roughshod over everyone around them, because 'individuals are all that matters,' allowing foreigners to invade, conquer, and despoil your lands 'because we are all equal,' is just as destructive as racism gone amok.

For fifty years now we have all been told to not be racist, that racism (and sexism, and anti-semitism, etc) is the source of all evil. For this reason, not a single inch of racism (or sexism, or anti-semitism, etc) has caused any of the problems of the modern era. Racism (or sexism, or anti-semitism, etc) cannot possibly be to blame for any of the hellish circumstances we find ourselves in today. And as it turns out, the world is now MUCH, MUCH more evil than it ever was before. This is not just a subjective statement of preference, it is objectively born out by the statistics of people's self-destroyed lives. Never have people been more depressed, more unhealthy, more self-destructive than today -- not once in history have birth rates depopulated a land more thoroughly than the black plague. It's a simple matter of cause and effect: First we banished racism, sexism, anti-semitism, homophobia, etc from the public sphere. Then we became the unhappiest people on earth and proceeded to kill ourselves off at a pace faster than the Black Death. Only a return to racism, sexism, and anti-semitism can possibly save us, because only by banishing these attitudes did we get here in the first place. C.S. Lewis once explained, that sometimes when people find they are lost and have strayed off the path, the only possible solution is to retrace their steps, go backwards until they have returned to where they started, and only then can they proceed forward again. In other words, progress is often simply returning to where we came from, when mistakes are made, there is nothing better than undoing the mistake.

When we got rid of racism, sexism, and anti-semitism, we doomed ourselves to today. A day where women have destroyed the family, children are no longer raised correctly, couples can no longer have meaningful and lasting relationships, and life can no longer be brought into the world. Where jews have destroyed our souls, by vilifying our history, replacing our uplifting epics with their degenerate lies in Hollywood and the media, and making us worship in their temples of holocaustianity, judeo-christianity and political correctness. Where other races steal the bread from our tables, the land from our ancestors, the birthright of our children, the language we speak, the government we ran, and even the wombs of our women, leaving us with nothing and nowhere for ourselves and our own. There is a direct link between all the problems society faces today, and the last fifty years we have lived in denial about the facts of life and the wisdom of our ancestors. (Who, UNIVERSALLY, were all racist, sexist, anti-semites, who I can quote ENDLESSLY from proving all of these points.) For anyone who wants a 'return to the good old days,' but refuses to return to the attitudes and philosophies and ideals that created the good old days, you are either cowards or hypocrites. A bunch of rotten fools who demand the benefits of something without ever undertaking its costs, its responsibilities, its actual creation.

It's clear as day that racism would not allow foreigners to waltz into our country, vote themselves welfare and take our jobs while raping our women.

It's clear as day sexism would not allow divorce, adultery, single motherhood or slut-spinsters who make a mockery of love.

It's clear as day that anti-semitism would not allow bank bailouts, media lies, filthy movies, or foreign wars for Israel.

All the ills of today would have been laughed away in scorn or slapped down with an iron fist of disdain a hundred years ago. No one would have stood for this shit, not for a single instant. When you take away all sanity and reason, every ability to protect ourselves and our society, what once was laughably simple and laughably easy to solve, is now an insurmountable dilemma threatening to drive us all to extinction. What a border guard or quiet talk could have solved yesterday, now requires an all out war today. This can't go on. What can't go on, won't go on. Either we continue our descent until every last person in the West has 1) killed themselves, 2) killed their mind, or 3) leaves, or we reverse our descent and return to the healthy society that once conquered the world and now can conquer the stars.

The Power of Imagery:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32387123/ns/health-behavior/

Read all about it. It turns out that if people are shown a fictional movie, and read a true account of the same subject, they will 50% of the time, one week later, when asked what truly happened, respond with the movie's version of events.

Alternatively, if the movie is the same as the text's true account, they will 50% more accurate in their recollections of the truth.

Basically a massive portion of the populace cannot be reached through the written word and is solely manipulable through tv and movie images.

Who controls Hollywood?


http://www.latimes.com/news/columnists/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,3844853.column

Well, here's a jew writing in the mainstream press the same answer we are 'radical', 'conspiracy theorists,' or 'nuts' when we say the same.

Jews control hollywood. If Jews control hollywood and the TV stations (which of course they do), this means they have the power to manipulate 50% of the population to such a point that even when they are given the truth to read, they will prefer the fantasy fiction on the screen.

Is this really an entertainment device? Or is it a weapon held at our jugular? If jews can make half the population believe anything jews want them to believe, in a democracy, this gives them total power over the country. Where do you think all these ridiculous lies come from? This is why jews cannot be allowed near a camera or a microphone, they broadcast poison and they use it to gain power over the rest of us. Whether jews live inside our country, or outside of it, their influence will be the same, if we allow a single one of their movies or TV shows to be shown. Basically, TV and movies are not the harmless 'fiction' that mature responsible adults can enjoy without psychological brainwashing. For the majority of the population, it is a weapon that enslaves them for life into a world of lies. They cannot distinguish between truth and fiction. If they see it happen, it must be true. That's as far as their lowly IQ ever goes. Then these brainwashed zombies turn around and vote for the jewish hand-picked candidates, because of what the movies and TV shows taught them was true and good. This drags the rest of us down with them, whether we were fooled or not. Commonly these zombie masses will exert peer pressure on us to conform to the movie-reality they have been sucked into, or they will divorce us, disown us, fire us from our jobs, and so on.

It's no good to be living in a population of 1/10 manipulators, 1/2 zombies, and 2/5 honest free men. The zombies are doomed due to their own weakness, so we can ignore them if we please. But what about the honest free men who just want to live in the clean air of truth and not be bullied by the losers around them? What about the 2/5 of the population which wants neither to manipulate, nor be manipulated? Do we just have to stand here and watch armies, legions of zombies be produced in hollywood factories to be ranged against us in their battles, peer pressure, economic pressure, elections, etc? If we do, we will be dragged down with them.

This is the curse of anyone who knows the truth, knows what is right, but will not act. He will be dragged down with everyone else. Despite what is inside his head, he will act like everyone else around him, and the consequences of society's acts will affect him just as much as anyone else. It is useless to be free of lies personally, the entire country must be purged of lies, brainwashing, and manipulation, or else you may as well be just as deceived as the next guy. And that means in this case, jews and all jewish thinking from the beginning of time to today must be purged from the country. That is, unless studies show that the inhabitants of said country are responsible enough, mature enough to watch lies for entertainment value, or for the edifying purpose of recognizing lies when they see them, and are no longer misled and controlled. We can hope through self-selection that our homeland would have less fools like the ones reported in the article, and that through eugenics we would soon overtake the IQ of our jewish overlords and thus see through all their trickery -- but at least to start with, what we need is an independent media making our own music, movies, television, religion and myths.

We need our children watching life-affirming values that inspire and reinforce their racial instincts. It could be as simple as showing the earlier Disney films, before jews took the company over -- Sleeping Beauty, Cinderalla. It could be showing Lord of the Rings and Star Wars. Braveheart, The Patriot, Gladiator. Stories where men are still men and they fight for something larger than themselves. For a free people, we need an extremely controlled media. It sounds paradoxical, and yet it is crucial. If lies are more believable than truth to the common eye, we can't pollute people's minds with even the most innocent of fictions. We become the guardians of Truth, by ruthlessly censoring any lie that might pass through the screen's pixels before it reaches our populace and changes their attitudes and behavior forever.

Humans were never adapted to look at seemingly real-life events, and assume they were false. This power came from technology just 100 years ago. For a couple million years, people assumed that if they saw it with their own eyes, it must be true. It will take a long time for our minds to catch up, evolutionarily, to the world we face today. Until then, we must treat the technology of motion pictures as carefully as the nuclear bomb. It's simply too dangerous in private hands.

Whenever I say jews control America, or jews control the world, people say that's impossible, there's too few of them, blah blah. And yet, when I point out that the entire world watches Hollywood movies, and that 50% of people when given a true account of what happens, still believe the movie they saw was the true version of events, and that therefore 50% of the world believes anything jews tell them -- they can't see how that yields jews control of the world? When I point out that 50% of the world's religions (by population) are based originally on the Torah, that giant stack of lies we call the Old Testament and the center piece of all jewish thinking, they imagine jews don't in the least control or influence them!

The fact is, you don't need political control over someone, if you have already lied them into supporting you through modern media or ancient scripture. The easily misled, the zombies, are completely tied up in the Jews' corner. And the free men, the ones that can't be fooled, are dragged down with the zombies due to the disparity in numbers. This amounts to total world power. How can it not? The study is right there. It speaks for itself. People have a right to know the truth and live according to its precepts. Whether they are stupid and gullible, or being dragged down by the stupid and gullible, it is still wrong to force them down the wrong path. If jews don't get that, if they insist on inserting lies into all of their news coverage, movies, music, magazines, and tv shows, then people have a right to live without jews and free of all jewish thinking from ever crossing their country's borders. What else can we do? Must we simply bow our heads and be their slaves forever? Must we be their cattle and lick their feet forever, as Israel's Prime Minister wished of us? I'm sorry, but I want better in life than that. I want white children all around the world, to have a better life than that. Whether it inconveniences jews or not.

Carrots and Sticks

How will we recruit the revolutionary vanguard needed to secure a white homeland? Obviously if we already had one, we could simply revolt. Since we don't have one, we must first convince people to become one. What's in it for them? We must show that their lives and their children's lives would be better off in a white homeland, than the USA. We must also provide a feasible plan proving the revolution would succeed if they try. I think the plan offered is feasible. I don't have exact knowledge or need exact knowledge on how the revolution could seize military hardware or nuclear weapons and point them outwards, while securing every street corner with a man with a gun. People better qualified than me, once they JOIN the revolution, can do this planning for us. But looking at it from 'above,' it just makes sense to me. In the end the only enemy America can throw at us is young white men of fighting age. No one else is worth a dime or has any military significance. If we corner the young white men with the guts to fight market, the war is won. It's won by default, whatever our plan is.

This doesn't mean women, children, and old people have no reason to live in a white homeland. They have every reason to do so. It just means that they aren't the people we have to convince. The people we have to convince are the ones who will be doing the killing and dying. Whoever else wants in is welcome, but the white men are going to be necessary.

So, what's in it for a white revolutionary? Why should he bother? What's wrong with America? Length of life is around 78, per capita GDP is 46,000 a year, crime isn't all that high in the suburbs, fancy new toys like iphones and computers are coming out every year, so what's the big deal? To say something like I did, that there is no future for white children outside a white homeland, that the men will be galley slaves and the women harem slaves, what on Earth am I smoking?

Like frogs who are being cooked slowly, whites have lost the perspective to notice the genocide being conducted against them. The genocide is insidious because it is slow and silent. If anyone imagines that in 100 years, these same rosy stats will be true of white Americans as they are today, they are absolutely deluded.

Where do I begin? How about with this. Since 1973, wages for the working class have not risen, even though worker productivity has doubled. Every extra dime you made was simply transferred to the wealthy -- you didn't see a dime out of your own effort and sacrifice for the last 40 years. The minimum wage has not kept up with inflation, you are getting poorer, not richer, as America ages.

Many of the people reading this, hopefully most of the people reading this, were not alive in 1973. They have never in their lives seen a pay raise, even though, and I stress, worker productivity has doubled. Do you think you will ever see a pay raise? Any pay raise that matches inflation, for the rest of your lives?

How do you imagine this pay raise will come about? You are competing with women, who have doubled the size of the workforce. You are competing with offshore workers, all 7 billion of the world's population. For jobs that have to be within our borders, you are competing with every last Jose and Marguerite, who can cross our border unopposed and take any job they like. Even though unemployment is now up to around 20 million in America, millions of immigrants, legal and illegal, are still being allowed in every year to compete for the remaining jobs.

The iron law of economics is supply and demand. If the supply of labor increases faster than the demand, the price of labor must go down to reach an equilibrium. That's your labor, bucko. Your labor will never be worth anything, because they have made damn sure your labor isn't worth anything. It will never improve -- in fact, it will get worse every year. I can simply PROMISE this. Demographics doesn't lie.

In 1950, a less productive economy, far less efficient and without any aid from computers, a man could get a job and support a family of 5. He could keep his same job his whole life, afford a house, a car, the white picket fence, the whole shebang. Then he could retire with a pension plan from his company, social security benefits, and plenty of kids willing to help out around the house. His wife wouldn't have to work a day in her life.

Now you tell me who is richer. 1950's America, or 2009? Sure, the stock market says we're richer. Sure, we have some new gizmos and toys. Sure, the houses are bigger (not that anyone lives in said houses, since our families are small to non-existent.) But are we really richer? Two people work, no job security, can't afford any kids, or anyone to raise the kids, social security is going bankrupt and won't help any of us, and the family is up in its ears in debt, and their nice big home is probably being foreclosed on. Traffic is heavier and we have to commute for hours just to get to and from work, adding yet more work for less pay. Do you get it yet, you poor deluded fools? They've stolen it from us. The American Dream is gone. And all that stock market money, that monopoly money they throw around in the quadrillions, is just a punch of baloney. The real facts on the ground do not reflect this wealth. Debt is not money, it's just playing pretend. Speculation isn't money, it's just playing pretend. Inflation isn't money, it's just playing pretend. Paper isn't money, it's just playing pretend. Real wealth is measured by real quality of life. In the past, a single man working normal hours could afford to support his entire family without going into debt and could retire in security, he wouldn't lose his job before then either.

That is wealth. Numbers are pure imagination, they reflect nothing but the con games of the rich, who use endless arrays of numbers to move money around, produce nothing, and somehow skim their wealth off the top of the frothy mess. Even supposing America was much richer today, who cares? Who cares if only 1% of the people ever see any of these riches? Are we really happy because George Soros is a billionaire? What's in it for us? Where's our golden ticket? I'll tell you what, it's never coming. You'll never get out of debt, you'll never get that coveted raise or promotion, because the law of supply and demand is non-negotiable. Look around you, a million new immigrants every year come to take YOUR job. You think this is a recipe for riches? Yes, for the top 1%. For everyone else? Get ready to man your galley, slave.

If it wasn't bad enough being slaves to our corporations, the government is moving in to take what's left of our freedom and labor for itself. The government has decided to put America 72 trillion dollars into debt, a debt we the workers will have to somehow repay. How? God knows how. Nobody knows how. They just assume, magically, that it will work itself out when the day arrives. In a geriocracy where the old outnumber the young, it will be impossible for us, the workers, to ever cut social security, medicare, prescription drug benefits, or any of the curses they have loaded down on us via their pernicious votes. These chains will take out our pay in terms of FICA, payroll taxes, income taxes, until we bring home barely nothing -- which we'll then spend on student loans or mortgage loans or car loans all at 30% interest, and all stuff we never should have had to go into debt for in the first place, in a properly run society. Every rent payment you make is just that much theft -- first they make housing outrageously expensive with outrageous interest payments, then they charge you for not buying an impossible to afford house. When people's take home pay is around 10,000 a year, it's awfully hard to buy a 500,000 2 bedroom 2 bath house.

They've got you right where they want you, paying for nothing, and whatever property taxes the locals levy for their 'schools' (ie minority daycare centers, since whites no longer can afford children, teacher welfare payments, since white kids never learn anything at school, government brainwashing centers, since whites can't be trusted to raise their own kids) is passed directly down to your rent. There is no tax on the rich. Just as the corporate income tax simply adds to the price of our goods or cuts worker pay, property tax is simply charged to the people renting, and sales tax is simply transferred to the purchaser. Disproportionately, the poor have to pay the liquor and cigarette taxes too, because first the rich grind you down with shit jobs and shit respect, then when you try and cope with that by escapism, they nail you again with super high excise taxes. THE GAME NEVER ENDS. The fleecing never stops.

Whites didn't used to need giant houses (where no one lives because we no longer have children.) They didn't need long commutes either. This is the hidden cost of our 'diversity.' The high crime of non-whites leaves whites with two options. They can sit in the center of a third world hellhole, where living standards are as low as Africa, until they are raped or murdered. Many people are forced to do this, and listen to the gunshots and police sirens drone on every day and every night non-stop. Or you can buy a super-expensive home, way far away, where the bad guys can't reach you. And by playing this arms race of home bidding, hopefully you can always stay one step ahead of the minority criminal, one neighborhood ahead, one block ahead of the gunfire. This won't work forever, the federal government has already caught on and given 'section 8' housing subsidies alongside their HUD housing subsidies, so that wherever whites flee, no matter how much they pay, the infinite wealth of the government can plop a few enriching somalis or nigerians into the house next door -- and the gun shots and drug pushing will resume as normal.

Even if it did work, people are going massively into debt to buy something they don't want -- an expensive house -- because we are not allowed to buy the one thing we really want -- security. A safe place for our wife and kids to live and grow up in without anyone hurting them. You cannot buy that, nearly at any price, in today's America. And as the criminals stream in by the millions, the murderous and gang banging hispanics and blacks and arabs and everyone else on earth -- security will decrease every year from here to eternity. Outside a white homeland, no matter how big your empty house with no people living in it, you will never be safe. Your family will never be safe. You will never know when the cell phone call is your crying daughter. South African whites have giant houses too -- surrounded by blacks, it's all meaningless. They are being hunted down one by one. There isn't a single family that hasn't been attacked, or doesn't know someone who has.

What is your money worth if it can't buy a safe place to live? America is taxing you heavier than any government has a right to tax anyone, but it can't grant you the most basic role of the state -- security. It's quite willing to spend 400 billion a year on 'defense' (IE, invading and attacking random nations around the world), but it won't spend a single penny in YOUR defense. So what's the point? America has ceased fulfilling any of its responsibilities as a government, it ceased doing this long ago -- why should any of us support it? When is the last time our government has been on our side?

There is something just as vital being neglected here. If men cannot make a decent wage, something even more precious has been stolen from them: Their pride. A man who makes less than his wife, who lives on the dole, who can't get a job, who can't pay for kids -- who can't even attract a mate because his bank account isn't flush enough -- who is divorced the moment he falls through the cracks -- such men are pale shadows of the 1950's existence. Women can talk all they want about how money doesn't matter, but the statistics show just the opposite: Whenever women make more than their men in a family, the clock is ticking -- divorce rates skyrocket to near 100%. The women in their hearts despise you, and the men in their hearts despise themselves -- both people hate every second of their lives. Probably, they'll start cheating on you with men who make more money, and become more and more flagrant about these 'hints' until you get it and accept a divorce. There's no rhyme or reason to it, it is simply how nature built men and women. Men are supposed to be the providers and protectors, if we cease to fulfill this function, women are no longer attracted to us. They have absolutely no use for us. Women have more satisfying orgasms when they are told the man they are fucking is rich compared to when they are told he is poor. That's how ridiculous it is. When we throw out traditional gender roles, it's not like evolution disappears, or instincts disappear, with them. Instead all we get is chaos and destruction.

You are ground zero of this destruction. Corporations were eager to double the size of the workforce and thus depress wages, women were eager to abandon the hard work of child birth and play 'big shot,' walking around in high heels and coats and thinking highly of themselves with their liberal arts degrees and service jobs, and men? Well, men are sexist if they don't think this is the greatest thing in human history. Fuck men. Men are obsolete, they do nothing anymore, they're good for nothing but the galleys. Maybe they can pretend to be a vibrator if they're lucky.

Without pride, what is life worth? Without a husband and children a woman can love and support, what is her life worth? We are born to play out certain roles, we are only truly satisfied when we fulfill them -- all but the degenerate psychos at least -- but no one is fulfilling them anymore. A happy few here and there? Sure. Probably they hang out with the 1% crowd getting all of America's vaunted wealth. For everyone else, there's adultery, arguments, emptiness and ephemeral relationships that produce nothing but heartache. Relationships have been so skewered, so utterly overturned, by women in the workplace, that I doubt our fertility rate, divorce rate, or anything will recover. The nuclear family is doomed in America, and due to that, every child born in America is doomed to lack a nuclear family, and all the mental illnesses and problems caused thereby. Most children will never be born at all. Women are too 'busy' to do their one and only duty in life! This hurts everyone. The fatherless, the motherless, the childless, the husbandless, the wifeless, everyone. Everyone would be happier if we returned to the old ways. That isn't chauvinism, it's common sense. It's just as good for the women to live natural lives, than men. It's no good for anyone to live like this.

Do you get it yet, slave? Do you get why your 'life expectancy, 78 (years of loneliness and meaninglessness), 46,000 per capita (deposited directly into George Soros' bank account), is nothing at all? That America can offer you nothing and no reason to live? That any child you bring into this world, will only live to see Hell from beginning to end?

So there are the sticks. You will not have a rewarding or fruitful relationship, probably any time in your life. You will never make enough money to pay off your taxes and debts. You will never get ahead because some immigrant worker or outsourcer will always be tearing you back down. You will never be safe because the government will not enforce basic law and order and subhumans prowl your neighborhoods night and day. Your very genetic existence -- whether it is your own kids, or the entire white race, is being snuffed out by low birth rates plus territory destruction. You will literally have nothing left on this earth if you are born today, by the day you die. You will have lived to see every last white family, white nation, white landmark, destroyed and conquered, raped and pillaged from the Earth. If you build something bright and beautiful, you will live to see it torn down and smashed right in front of your eyes by the jealous and feral immigrants who took your land. If you invent something, you will live to see the technology forgotten and no longer maintained, and the products rust away in landfills. If you have children, you will live to seem them raped or murdered before you. If you save up a fortune, you will see it expropriated at the point of a gun. If you do ANYTHING, it will not outlive you. Your actions will no longer have any impact or any meaning -- you will no longer be able to help anyone but parasites and destroyers. You will not live in the heart or memory of anyone on earth. No one will visit your grave or mourn your passing.

Do you get it yet? The death of the white race isn't some theoretical construct. It means your life is meaningless, and no one will ever love you. It's the death of your immortal soul. It's the second death, the death of being forgotten, of the universe wiping all trace of you from its records. It's the worst fate that could ever befall anyone. Is that stick enough for you? Is that sensational enough to get you up off your ass and do something?

If not, don't worry, I still have the carrot portion of this deal.

Here are some carrots -- Freedom of Speech, Freedom to bear Arms, Freedom of Religion. The real bill of rights, the one that we no longer have and haven't had for a century or so. Decent jobs at high wages that you are absolutely assured to get -- no non-white competitors that can take it from you. True security, where crime is completely unheard of and people can leave everything unlocked without fear. A citizen's dividend that always keeps your head above water and out of debt, paid in full to everyone equally -- no special interests -- no rewards for bad behavior -- no minorities -- taken as a giant thank you for being a proud member of our country, mainly from the rich who don't need the money anyway. Lower taxes for everyone. Eugenics that means every generation will be better than the last. A space program that gives our nation a common destiny. Every man can find a wife, and every wife a man, because marriage is mandatory at 20 and two children are mandatory by 25, and while children are growing up, women can't work beyond maybe a part time job (afterwards, knock your socks off). Divorce will not be allowed without grounds. Adultery will not be allowed, period. Schools will teach something useful and be the high point of your child's day, not prison terms. Children will laugh and play outside again.

Your race will be safe, and your memory honored for all time. You will have made the largest impact in world history, because saving the white race is the most important thing anyone could possibly do in history. You can live in a world free of lies and hypocrisy -- you can finally breathe easy and say what you really feel without punishment. The media will no longer be mocking you on TV. The streets will be clean, the houses painted, and the air clear. Everything will look beautiful -- including every person you pass on the street -- white like you with hope and joy in their faces, like the hope and joy in yours. An end to all foreign wars. A nobility of merit, not of greed, that loves their people, instead of hates us, running the show. An end to over crowding, wide open spaces, and houses you can afford.

Can you see it yet? The happiness we can fight for, but will never be given to us? In that case, become a white nationalist, in the true sense of the word, and for Christ's sake, fight for a white nation.

We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. In the end all of this 'what's in it for me' bullshit has to stop anyway. I just have to look you in the eye and ask flat out if you are going to watch the blonde haired blue eyed children running around in the parks today die forever, or if you are going to do something to save them. Are you going to betray us or not? In one case, I hope I shoot you someday. In the other, welcome aboard.

White Men Deserve Better

Next I'll detail why white men of fighting age should join the Revolution and fight for a better future. Every year, of course, the vice clamps yet harder down upon us, and the reasons become more obvious to anyone. But the offsetting rise in propaganda, brainwashing, peer pressure, ostracism, and the like keep men in line.

Moreover, it seems six tools are used to keep the white men down above all others:

Ballots, Bribes, Bitching, Brainwashing, Blathering, and Bullying.

Accompanying these are the normally healthy white man's instincts -- the desire to protect the weak, the desire to be strong and independent and tough, the desire to win status and further his reproductive success, and the like instincts that are being used against us.

If we could get white men to see past their instincts and reflect on the larger pattern, how they are being manipulated and used to benefit everyone but themselves, that vague sense of discomfort, disquiet, and disdain for the modern world should erupt into a much hotter volcano of rage, hatred, and fanaticism. A level of emotion that can actually Do something about the world we find ourselves in. A level of emotion willing to kill and die for something better.

First, a list of how we've been wronged:

1. In World Wars I and II, we were told lies by various elites to engage in a completely pointless and fratricidal war. Tens of millions of people, mainly men, died uselessly killing their own brothers, to line various people's pockets and accomplish various people's dreams. White Men as a group were certainly not helped by these wars, they mark the beginning of our decline. Nothing good has come from these wars. The awful Versailles treaty and the Bolshevik Revolution that led to the death of a 100 million people came out of WWI. Out of WWII came the Iron Curtain and the Cold War, nearly obliterating all humanity and enslaving nearly one half of whites for 50 years. Russia has still not recovered from these two world wars and the resulting triumphs of communism -- if you ask me they never will. For comparative purposes, remember the worst tragedy in human history was the supposed death of '6 million jews.'

2. Women and Non-Whites were granted the vote, completely undermining our political power. However, they were not required to share any of our civic duty. We are still the majority of the taxpayers, the majority of the army, the majority of the great thinkers, the productive class that actually has to accomplish whatever our government decides our country should do. IE, one group votes to decide what we should do, and the other group goes out and does it. How is this fair? And yet, this is the practical effect of giving women and non-whites the vote -- white men have all been conscripted into endless labor and wars we wanted no part in, and our servitude will never end because we will never be the majority no matter how many thousands of years pass.

3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Freedom_Day In 1910, white men were paying 5% of their money into taxes. They worked for the government from January 1st to January 19th, and for the rest of the year they worked for themselves.

Today in 2010, we as a nation pay 28% of our money into taxes. We work until April 13 for the government, and are free from there on to work for ourselves. Given white men make more than women or non-whites, our tax burden is even higher. Obama has plans to dramatically raise taxes and therefore the problem only continues to worsen.

4. We have been saddled with outrageous spending programs that largely help everyone but ourselves: Social Security and Medicare for old women, since they live 5 years longer than us -- Medicaid and Welfare for women and non-whites, since they're the only ones who ever qualify for these programs. Every year white men work in order to enrich women or non-whites, and there's nothing we can do to stop it, because combined they outvote us every election. The cost to these programs are all set to skyrocket beyond anything we can imagine, to 60 trillion dollars of unpaid liabilities. At this point white men will be expected to work even harder for everyone else's gain.

5. We are sent to die in useless wars like Iraq, Afghanistan, and Vietnam, just to suit the ambitions, pockets, or dreamy ideals of the people in power. A tiny group of elites who lie us into war, inevitably making white men pay the lion's share for the achievement of their evil designs. Our blood is on their hands.

6. Every year, 500,000 white men are raped every year in the prison system. This far out scales the rape of all women raped outside the prison system. ((Not to mention how much more traumatic it is to be raped in prison by a black monster, than raped by your over-aggressive date or whatever in the outside world.)) Nothing is done to stop these rapes, there is no punishment for the men who do it, and there is no sympathy for the men who suffer. This goes well beyond cruel and unusual punishment, but simply because we are white men, no one gives a damn or will say a word in our defense. Most people find it funny and like to joke about our suffering.

7. Divorce courts have been situated so that women can unilaterally divorce their husbands for NO REASON. These 'no-fault' divorces invariably end up with women taking a major portion of the assets men have worked decades to earn, and invariably end up with custody of the children. If a man is lucky, he can see his children every now and then, but it's largely futile. The mother will poison the children against their Dad, the Dad will have little to nothing in common with the children he doesn't see often enough to have an impact on, and he'll never be there when he really wants to be there, or they really want him to be there for them. Half of all marriages end in divorce. 2/3 of the time, it was the woman who filed for the divorce. Women are as likely to cheat on their husbands as men. But unlike when men cheat, resulting only in heartbreak, when women cheat something much worse can occur -- often your own children won't even be yours. I can't get any good solid numbers, but don't be stunned if the number is around 10%. In this day and age, women simply can't be trusted. Their word means nothing. They are taught to view their word as meaning absolutely nothing. If it makes them happy, it's right, and damn the white male oppressor who gets in their way.

8. Men have no right to veto an abortion. Even if they'd adopt and raise the child on their own, the women are allowed to simply slaughter the child and move on.

9. Affirmative Action means a white man can't get the grades, the college entrance, the job, or the promotion he deserves. Affirmative Action is not a tiny 'thumb on the scale' but can be dramatic, insane numbers like a 50%, 100%, or infinite preference for anyone but a white man. White men find affirmative action so bad, they can't even be hired for government jobs.

10. Schools are designed to favor women's learning styles. The result is women get better grades and have become the majority of college goers, even though men have on average 5 IQ points more intelligence. Boys meanwhile are dosed with ritalin and literally tortured their whole way through the school system full of women teachers praising and rewarding girl students while dissing and neglecting boy students, and teaching constantly how evil and inferior white men are from 8am to 3pm via their english and history classes.

11. Around 1/3 of white women no longer even pursue children. Because of the necessity for a womb to have a child, this leaves well over a third of men to have no choice at all in the matter -- they are simply exterminated from the gene pool despite how good fathers they'd be or how much they'd love their children. The hatred women have developed for men and children means they can kill off hundreds of millions of us through this quiet non-participation in sexual reproduction, and we are allowed to do nothing in our own defense.

12. Women are more likely to initiate domestic abuse than men. And yet all the lifetime movies, all the schoolroom classes, all the media talk about is men domestically abusing women. This vicious libel leaves men unprotected and vilified.

13. Men commit suicide 4 times as often as women, we are more often the victims of crime and murder, but the only sob stories anyone ever tells are about when a woman dies: Natalie Holloway, or Stacy Peterson, or whoever the hell is on the TV at the time. No one gives a damn about our safety and no one has attempted to adjust public policy to protect the truly endangered sex's feelings.

14. White Men's thinking has been criminalized. While women and non-whites can say whatever they want: "the white race is the cancer of human history," or "women need men like a fish needs a bicycle," or "one settler, one bullet," if a man says anything 'hateful' or 'discriminatory' against women or gays or non-whites, they will be socially ostracized, fired, and possibly thrown in jail. Dozens of men around the world lay rotting in prison for verbally offending the wrong 'group.' Needless to say, there's never been any penalty for vilifying white men, nor is anyone rotting in prison for offending our sensibilities.

15. White men on TV are treated with total contempt, whether it is the show or the commercial, the men are stupid, incompetent, or evil. White men are portrayed as the criminal in every crime show, even though the vast majority of crime is done by non-whites. In fact, black WOMEN do more crime than white men. This culture of demonization encourages everyone watching it to punish us in real life, as though TV and reality were connected. Since women are the main target audience of most television shows and commercials, producers are encouraged to vilify men in this way and give women their hateful rush of delight they always get when looking down on us, their sexual adversary.

16. However, I'd say the greatest harm that was ever done to white men is when Honor was thrown in the trash and replaced with feminine virtues like tolerance, compassion, pacifism, etc. Men are good at being honest, they are good at being just, they are good at keeping their words. But when that is no longer highly regarded, when that no longer has any reward, men are forced to abandon the virtues that best fit them, and are forced to wear like drag queens the virtues of contemporary society. Of course, we always find ourselves unsuited for these virtues, and lacking in their possession compared to our 'more virtuous' women overlords. Women constantly reprimand us for not being as caring, tolerant, nice, or sympathetic as they are. They never praise us for being more honest or honorable than themselves. We have lost our very manhood and can only pretend to be pale imitations, second class women in this inverted world. The fact that our very fertility and testosterone levels have declined every generation show the physical feminization of our entire sex. We are becoming shriveled husks, fake women, weaker versions of the weaker sex. They are eradicating, physically, through some chemical in the air or just through the choking degeneracy of our culture, our very manhood.

Are you mad yet, slave? Do you want better yet, bottom of the totem pole? Apparently not! This all suits men just fine, even though this is just the tip of the iceberg and it only gets worse each year. Why do we say nothing, do nothing in protest? Why aren't we outraged? Why aren't we organizing to do something about this?

Like I said, they are skillful users of the tools they have: Ballots, Bribes, Bitching, Brainwashing, Blather, Bullying.

1. Ballots: So long as we accept the legitimacy of democracy, it doesn't matter what we think. They will always outvote us, always. The first tool we must rip from their hands is the vote. It is a weapon of war just as deadly as a nuclear bomb, and it has been waged relentlessly against us for a century!

2. Bribes: Some men can get very rich under this system, and find plenty of status and women. They will always prefer the status quo, even if it comes at our expense. Other men don't get much, but they are foolishly content with a beer in the fridge, a sports game on the television, and a meaningless life. They figure nothing matters so long as they can be 'happy.' They've lost the ability to be angry about anything, or care about anyone.

3. Bitching: Tons of men listen to the mewling whines of women and non-whites, get some giant complex of the great provider or great protector, and work endlessly to help these helpless masses. They enjoy being used, they want to be used. They couldn't stand even thinking about hurting anyone, what if they cried? No one wants to see a woman or child cry! If there is to be suffering in this world, let it be the men who suffer. We have stoic hearts and strong shoulders, we can carry everyone's weight on our back, in fact, the entire purpose and meaning of being a man is carrying everyone else's suffering and hardships on our own backs. We are like little Jesuses! Until we stop pitying them and start pitying ourselves, until we realize still water runs deep, until we realize that the squeaky wheel gets the grease, this con will continue forever.

4. Brainwashing: Due to the media and school system, men are never taught to think independently or the true facts of history. They are never taught to compare the actual positions of whites and non whites in society, or men and women in society. They are not taught to consider whether white men have done anything good in history, or have any rights of their own, or what role we should play in society. If you are raised in a completely twisted and deranged fashion, it's no wonder how few men are capable of reaching sound and healthy instincts and views.

5. Blathering: By this I mean men who say stupid crap like: "We should treat everyone as individuals," while ignoring that no one is treating US as individuals, but is preying on white men as a group. Or idealistic crap like "we should support all decent people of good morals," while ignoring how impossible this is under the current system that rewards degeneracy and corruption. Or "We can't be violent," when violence is ongoing every day against us, and not fighting back is simply suicide. The idealistic blather goes on and on, but mainly its goal is to make people powerless. To make people decide to do nothing. To make people decide that morally, they can do nothing. Idealistic Blather is often a mask for cowardice, when people know what they should do but don't want to pay the price to do it. But often enough, the people genuinely mean it, having had such a dumb or soft childhood, having never thought the implications of their 'virtue' through to the end results, that they are idiots through and through. Of course the main pushers of all this idealistic blather are rarely white men, even though they are shackled by accepting said beliefs.

6. Bullying: When any white man shows an ounce of courage or independence, everyone from all sides denounces him and forces him into groveling apologies. It is rare for any white man to stand up against charges like "racist!" "sexist!" "homophobe!" "anti-semite!" "nut!" "extremist!" "loser!" Instead they will crawl into their shells and bow and scrape for their reputation back. This verbal bullying which keeps everyone in line, keeps men from encouraging each other, or developing their mentality further along said lines. Without the ability to unite, encourage each other, and inform each other, men are always left cowering on their own, assuming they are alone, that they are isolated, that they are helpless, that they must be insane or evil to believe what they believe. So long as men are kept huddling by these worthless words, we will always be the slave class. The internet can stop this -- but courage has to play its part too. Eventually men are going to have to grow a pair and ignore all the insults flung at them -- come what may.

None of these tools are impossible to overcome. With the right mindset, none of them can stop a white lion. A white warrior. We cannot be plead with, bribed off, shouted down, sophistically misled, mind controlled, or out-voted, unless we want to be. The question is, are we going to sit here and take this crap forever? Or will we find out of the vast sea of 500 million white men worldwide, a MEASLY 3 MILLION who cannot be controlled? If there aren't enough good men left in the world to defend even a tiny corner of our existence, then oh well. Let the Asians have the Earth. We should all just die and go to Hell.

More Details and Benefits of the Revolution:

When you filter out the women, children, and elderly of any population, you are left with a very small core of men who are actually maintaining civilization.

According to the CIA World Factbook, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html there are 100 million men aged 15-64 in the USA. The country is 65% white (supposedly), so that would leave 65 million white men. However this is a bit off, because many non-whites are on average younger than whites. It would be more likely to say there are something like 75 million white men in this category. Median age for men of the country is 35 years old. This helps us know how many men of fighting age we're really discussing here, with a cutoff of say 40 instead of the rather absurd 64. For every white male above age 35, there's one below age 35. So these 75 million whites should split largely past the cutoff age. 15-35 should be as numerous as 35-55, so that gives us around 40 million white men of fighting age.

These forty million white men must someday conquer the country that has stabbed them in the back for the last hundred years or so, though said betrayal has been rapidly accelerating in the last few decades. In a country of 300 million people, that's 13% of the population. As in, with white men of fighting age alone, we have sufficient numbers for a revolution. They would be up against women, children, aged grannies, and the non-white men (around 15 million) who are historically well known for being some of the weakest and easiest pushovers in wartime possible. I'm not worried about ANY of those groups. However, if say, 20 million white men attempted a revolution, and had to fight 20 million white men, 15 million non-white men, a gaggle of old people, children, and women, it becomes much dicier. First off, so long as we keep this a white men vs. non-white men thing, we can butcher only non-whites to secure the existence of our people. Second, the closer a war's sides are, the more bloody the battles become. If one side has overwhelming force, hardly anyone has to die. If the sides are evenly matched, the war just goes on forever -- like the horrors of WWI. That's why we should try very hard to recruit white men into a revolutionary mindset -- we want them to be signing the petition and we don't really need anyone else whether they sign it or not. If say, 3/4 of white men of fighting age (15-40) are in on the conspiracy, we could rather quickly disarm or take prisoner those who weren't in on the conspiracy, make it very clear how outnumbered and out-serioused the remaining white males were, and then concentrate all our firepower on the non-white men in our midst and go for a real turkey shoot. I wouldn't bet on victory without that kind of majority.

So now we've narrowed it down to 30 million white men who are needed to win a revolutionary war against the 300 million citizenry at large. Humorously, that puts us exactly back to my ballot: 'If 10% of the people revolt, I will revolt.' 10% seems to be the magic number -- so long as it includes 75% of white men of fighting age. With that kind of majority, the battle will be short, it will be relatively bloodless (for both sides), and it will go in our favor. Afterwards we can do whatever we like with the remaining population, with the basic knowledge that anyone who disagrees with our decisions has only one other option and that is to die. By the time we are ready to revolt, we will also be ready to make the revolt stick -- all thoughts of mercy, morality, compassion, justice, etc will out the window and the traditional tactics of the weak, voting bribing and whining, will mean nothing to us.

If we can't garner this 75% of white men country-wide, it is easy enough to scale down to a smaller segment of the country. Say we can't find 30 million white men with guts, we can only find 3 million. All hope isn't lost, the revolt could still be staged (though admittedly a much dicier one.) Instead of trying to retake and dictate to all of America however, it could be for a small piece of America.

Look at the populations of these states: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_population

Wyoming: 532,000
North Dakota: 641,000
Alaska: 686,000
South Dakota: 804,000
Montana: 967,000
Idaho: 1,523,000

Add them all up, you have a population of: 5,153,000.

That's right, nearly half of America's real estate has all of 5 million people in it. That's ripe territory for a two stage revolution. First, we move to those states, preferably with women and children who love and support us. Second, we revolt and seize all those states, preferably with as little bloodshed as possible, and massive overwhelming numbers. We then work ASAP to use the military bases in these regions, the nuclear silos, and the like to hold the rest of the USA at bay, and make them think twice before invading and crushing our little rebellion. Because it impacts very few American's lives to lose a giant chunk of America that has stubbornly neglected to be occupied by anyone anyway, because no one wants to get nuked for 'flyover country,' and because we are extremely dangerous sons-of-bitches no one wants to fuck with anyway, it should be possible to secure an existence for our people and a future for white children.

Three million men can revolt and occupy half the United States and, without more than a few shots fired, stare down the US government and the whole world. Hard to believe eh? But I've already run the numbers by you and they are solid. From there we could do a number of things, including invite anyone who agrees with our principles into this nearly empty quarter of America. With additional numbers from the US and the entire white world (all of whom by then will be desperate for escape from their multicult hellholes), we could soon have a truly populated nation, much larger than most countries on earth, and with the people to settle, reproduce, and hold our precious sovereign soil. There could be nothing more precious than a white homeland for the whole world's refugees as the 21st century winds down and demolishes every last country whites previously ruled. naturally everyone stuck within our suddenly declared borders who wished to leave, or we had no wish to be here, could emigrate or be deported respectively. After enough of these population transfers (and at most we're talking about deporting a meager 5 million people here), our country would be composed of pure White Nationalists. A healthy country with no cancers of unassimillable subhumans breeding in their midst, and no poisonous ideologies being whispered in the classrooms or on our TV screens.

There may well be a lot more men than women in this country, maybe a lot of men will be fighting with no hope of personal reproductive success. Who cares? The next generation of children will come out all right: 50% men, 50% women. That first generation of women may need to be a little heroic in their efforts to help people our country, but it should soon simmer down. And it is self-evident that children raised in a healthy white nationalist environment, without poison from abroad telling them to do unnatural things like race-mixing, homosexuality, careerism, or whore-mongering, will fit perfectly well into marriage and children and the true beginning of our white nation. For all the men who fought for the rights of other men and other women to have healthy, free, white children -- isn't that reward enough? First off, we're all genetically related, so they are in fact your children. Second off, this was our dream, it's enough to see it realized before we die -- it doesn't matter who. Third, if you have children outside this zone of safety, they would probably be miserable anyway. What future does the white race have outside our homeland? Any? I don't see any. Just rape, theft, and eventually murder for every last one of us. The men will be worked as galley-slaves, paying 99% taxes, while the women will work the harems, pimped out and kept high on drugs.

The flag for when the revolution is on will be when 75% of the white men of fighting age in these remotely settled states have signed onto the petition. That will require so little of us! So very little is necessary to stand up against our government, with nukes vs. nukes, planes vs. planes. A few million men, and the courage of our convictions.

After the war is won and our independence is granted, we could even set up a confederacy type government with little federal oversight except for free trade, common currency, common defense and the like. On the local scale, people could organize into yet purer communities of a single faith (or lack thereof), single political model (libertarian, anarchist, national socialist, communist, socialist, who cares? It will only be on that community's head and it won't adversely affect anyone who doesn't want to be a part of it.), and single philosophical model (criminal code, harsh or lenient? marriage, arranged or voluntary? gays, in or out? Abortion, legal or illegal?)

Every remaining controversy between white nationalists can thus be resolved without anyone oppressing or abusing anyone. It will be settled on the local level, people will sort themselves to where they feel most comfortable, and most importantly, it will not imperil our ability to maintain a strong front against the outside world, and keep the common defense necessary to defend our incredibly precious territory, the last white territory on earth.

Someday, if our enemies weaken or we grow in strength, centuries down the line, we could attempt to grab some more land from our friendly neighbors. However, that seems rather pointless, when the entire universe full of innumerable planets awaits us in Space. If our white homeland built, say, a space elevator, and sent a colony to Mars, or to Alpha Centauri, or just into the depths of space where no one will find us again -- we'll have infinite resources, and we'll truly be separated from our enemies once and for all. All local concerns about the Earth's territory will become petty and superfluous. The main benefit of a white homeland is not the temporary rescue of our race from complete annihilation in the outside world -- it is the chance to colonize space with the right sort of people, and be free of non-whites (or simply retarded whites who can't get their heads on straight) forever. That's where all of our excess energy should be pointed, and believe me, with the power of eugenics and the strength of our dedication, we CAN be the leaders of any technology we damn well choose to be. White Separatism can only truly exist among the stars -- our future has nothing to do with the outside world, nor is any conflict with the outside world desirable. Manifest Destiny no longer points west, it points UP.

I see no weak point in this plan. If people don't adopt it, if they aren't actually willing to fight for a white nation, they simply aren't white nationalists. That's how I feel. Hopefully 3 million others will grow to feel the same way, and soon.

If Violence is the Answer, How do we Win?

With the previously enunciated rule from the last post in mind: Law is determined not by voting blocks but by young men willing to do violence, we must then turn to the question, how can a violent revolution succeed?

I imagine a few different ways. One is detailed in Heinlein's book, where a group of five soldiers or so happen upon a storehouse of super high tech devices, and decide to launch a revolution against their Chinese Overlords single-handedly. I'm not sure what the title of the book was, but basically it endorsed the idea of the Yellow Menace and a new American Revolution for grandma and apple pie. So long as even a few whites survive, this revolution will always be possible. We don't know yet what kind of super-technology the future could hold, but it may be enough to completely even the odds between the few and the many. If the few strike first, it could give them the decisive advantage. This is why all hope is never lost, so long as there's even twenty or so white people left on earth. So long as some sort of racist secret society struggles through the centuries, always keeping its heart and gene line pure, it could always burst back out and achieve our salvation, with the help of super technology/ WMD. This one relies on inventions we don't have, but basically my advice would be for people to have children, indoctrinate said children, and don't miscegenate. Someday the tide might turn. The wheel of fortune turns, and those who were once on top now find themselves on the bottom. Nothing stays the same forever.

The next solution is the same hunker down idea, but with a twist. Instead of coming upon some super technology, instead of becoming miraculously stronger, we simply wait for everyone else to get weaker. For instance, if we wait long enough Africa will no doubt return to a spear-wielding society with no working cars, guns, or electricity. At that point it would be much easier to defeat them in battle, just by keeping what we already have. This of course doesn't work so long as they can feed off an enslaved producer class, so the first thing people must do when they hunker down, is completely detach themselves from the system. Go 'off the grid.' So long as our minds, morals, and muscles are fueling society, we can obviously never become stronger than it -- as a part cannot outweigh the whole. Atlas Shrugged also believed in the hunker down strategy -- escape the grid, refuse to contribute anything to the country, and let it wind down like a dying clock. If we are right and their behavior is evil and destructive, it will eventually catch up to them.

The problem with this idea is the prediction that any foreign society that isn't ideal, will eventually result in complete barbarism and self-destruction. This isn't necessarily the case. It's highly possible for countries like Iran, Pakistan, Mexico, or Indonesia to build a relatively powerful, prosperous, and stable nation that will never collapse in on itself. It's one thing to try and 'out wait' Zimbabwe, it's another entirely to try and out wait China. I don't believe waiting can weaken an occupying nation beyond a certain point. We can watch it descend gradually to its base level of worth, and then it will hum along at that base level forever. This does imply we'd gain something by waiting and letting people degenerate to the level they can sustain without us, but it doesn't imply that this level will be weaker than our own. It will probably still be much stronger!

Therefore terrorism and sabotage will be necessary to continue bringing down these entities after their natural decline has stopped. Which of course means the revolution will be on and the enemy would no longer turn a blind eye to us. Without sufficient numbers, we'd simply be crushed. There has to be a way to gain power on our side while the enemy weakens, so that when the war begins we have a reasonable chance.

How does the Revolution gain power? The best way is for non-whites, plutocrats, etc. to abuse the hell out of us. Especially young white males of military age. When white men can no longer find a job, can no longer afford their rent/mortgage, can no longer afford a family, are no longer attractive to white women for lack of said money/status, when they are ridiculed by the press and tv shows, demonized as the source of all the country's woes, taught in public school that they should be women or gays because men are evil, so on and so forth -- an extremely molten hot core of bitterness, frustration, and rage will be in the hearts of every white male who walks the streets. Currently it is economically possible for a white male to gain money, power, women, and status. Even though the odds are slanted against him, his natural merit makes up the difference. This is true even in South Africa. No matter how repressive the regime, it takes quite a lot of repression to keep a white male down. The general public belief of white men right now is 'suck it up,' and 'tough' whenever a white male complains about the disadvantages he faces. It will take more repression, much more, before white men admit to themselves and to each other that 'sucking it up' and 'trying harder' is no longer enough. That remaining within the system is a surefire recipe for destruction, that they really are screwed.

But I guarantee you much more is coming. Even for South Africa, they haven't even seen the beginning! There will be a day when the greedy, envious, hateful minority mass will decide to once and for all deprive white men of everything they have, regardless of what it takes to keep him down, regardless of how much that even hurts their own economy and well-being. The fact is, taxes are going to have to rise, probably to around 100%, to sustain just our current financial plans. The debt, medicare, social security, and so on will reach such astronomical costs that we will move to a communist state, where all income is collected, then redistributed to the Party chosen winners and losers. There's simply not enough money as things stand, to leave the currently biased but bearable tax system in place. I also believe that all savings will be seized by the government, sooner or later. Either through the use of hyperinflation, that makes all savings meaningless, or some sort of tax on savings that takes 10% each year, through a 100% estate tax, or SOMETHING. Minorities, ultimately, will not allow whites to accumulate wealth and power in a country whites do not govern or control. Eventually whites will be forced out of their land and houses, just like in Zimbabwe, and squatters will move in to take the accumulated centuries worth of work white men have invested into the land. Minorities don't know when to quit, their envy and hatred knows no bounds. Therefore, white men will sooner or later admit they are being given a raw deal, and will cease looking for self-reliance and rugged independence as answers. Collective, violent resistance at that point will look more attractive. And of course, this is where we gain the sudden influx in power and numbers we need to take on the decaying and degenerate tyrannical state.

Once people are enraged enough that all their petty concerns about morality (but we might hurt someoneeeeee!) (but what about the innocentssssssssss!) will no longer handcuff them, and all the boastful arrogance of (be a man!), (suck it up!), (solve your own problems!) will fall on deaf ears as people finally convince themselves that the world around them is indeed not their fault, and their personal tribulations really aren't of their own making, the revolution will have a mighty army indeed.

Do I expect both of these things to come to pass? I don't know. So much is uncertain in the future, including how minorities will treat us when they take over, whether a more moderate republican-style platform is adopted, whether technology produces vast wealth that can delay the inevitable, and so on. But I hope they treat us like total shit and take every last dime we own, because the sooner this war occurs the better. The longer we wait, the more of them, and the less of us, there will be. From here until the revolution, that math will continue inexorably against us. Obama is a heartening step in the right direction. The idiot has abused us so flagrantly so quickly, that his popularity is already down to 47%. We need about 30, 50 more years of this crap, and I think the inner fire of the white male would be sufficiently stoked for blood.

To clarify how exactly we could win the war when it begins, let's do a thought experiment. Say 50% of the country is sick of minorities and wants to be free to live in a white homeland actually geared to benefiting themselves. We have an internet database, say it's in code language (a poll asking whether violets or roses are better) or encrypted (0111000101011001), where people simply go online and drop their vote into the mailbox. On it is written:

"If 50% of the populace agrees to revolt, I will revolt with them." In this way, we avoid the trap of the airline hijackers: Suppose you've got a hijacker with a gun, he's holding 40 people hostage. If all 40 people rushed him at once, at most he'd kill 1 or 2, and 38 lives would be saved. However, if 1 or 2 people rushed the hijacker, they'd simply die for nothing, never standing a chance. Therefore everyone, fearing the crowd won't support them, is cowed into simply letting the hijacker having his way. As we currently know, the 'hijacker's way' in terms of the white race is our total extinction. That's the only interpretation of the massive birth rates, immigration into all our homelands, financial shakedowns of white tax payers, anti-white demonization in the schools and media, and the continuous encouragement of our miscegenation into a proper 'coffee brown worldwide monotone.'

With some sort of secure internet, mail-in database, or something, (message board? cell phone text logs?) we can overcome the hijacker's dilemma. We will know that the crowd has our back, and our sacrifice will a) not be likely b) not be in vain.

At the magic last sign up onto our petition, a coded email, buzzer beep, or the like would go out to everyone who had signed up, and we would all know simultaneously that the war was on -- the revolution had begun, and we were to join it. With this sort of surprise massive coordination, where we could live among everyone else as though we were perfectly fine with our society, the revolution could be organized and sprung without anyone having a chance to find countermeasures to it. With 50% of the population, all we would have to do is know one person personally that was not on the list of petitioners, (a secret gang sign? A tie of a certain pattern, whatever.) pick up our gun (or if guns have been confiscated, kitchen knife), find that person and kill him. By the end of the day if 50% of people kill one political opponent, we would automatically be 100% of the population and the war would be won. The one day war, with probably very few casualties on our side.

50% is a bit dreamy, so let's do the same experiment with fewer numbers. Let's say only 10% sign off. "If 10% of people agree to revolt, I will revolt." Has anything important changed? It would be even nicer to have some guns this time, granted. But the result would still be the same. You would know 9 people who had not signed the list, get your knives or baseball bats, sneak into their houses in the middle of the night, and get to butchering until the odds had been dramatically evened in your favor. My biggest worry would be that the US army would be heavily armed and armored and have enough sentries this kind of policy wouldn't work. However, all we need to solve that is the same 10% of people within the army willing to revolt. At the given cue, they would simply roll a grenade into their barracks, turn their machine gun to the guys left and right of them, or otherwise slaughter in a surprise assault before the others knew what hit them. Even the submarines, carriers, jet fighters, and every other weapon is vulnerable to this tactic. A bunch of people armed and suddenly blazing away at their comrades and 'friends' before the other side knows the war is on, can dramatically even even 1 to 10 odds. I suppose if we want to be careful, the rule should read something like, "If 10% of the population at large and 10% of the military currently in arms agrees to revolt, I will revolt."

Better to be safe than sorry. The revolution must win if we as a people are to survive.

Even outnumbered 9 to 1, another important question will be: How many of our opponents are women? How many of them are elderly? We could even spare all of those types, and simply concentrate on butchering the men who foolishly serve said demographics at their own expense. If we defang the political ambitions of women and elderly, such that they can't enforce them through their muscle men on the rest of us, it doesn't really matter what goes on in their pretty little heads. Then it would look more like 1 to 3 odds, now wouldn't it?

How many of our opponents are non-whites? As far as our military history goes, even Japanese only managed an exchange ratio of 10 to 1. As in, it takes 10 Japanese, some of the smartest and bravest people on earth, to take down a single white male in battle. Now maybe technology has changed in the meantime, but I don't care how you slice it -- white battles in our past are even more lopsided elsewhere. Cortez took out the entire Incan empire, Clive took out the entire Indian army (who was, by the way, better equipped and armed, with more cannons than the british), at the battle of blood river, a few South Africans took out an entire army of Zulus, with nothing more than single-fire bullets, a cannon or two, horses and sabers. If we are surrounded by minority men, not to mention kumbayah-singing women and ghoulish elderly, I wouldn't be too worried once the shooting starts. The only men we have any reason to fear, are our own. Hopefully most of them will have already signed up for OUR side.

After the war is won (and even with 10% of the military/population, I feel we would win hands down, due to the poor quality of our opponents, the fire in our hearts, and the suddenness of the surprise.), I wouldn't worry too much about political resistance of the survivors. People would quickly see where their bread is buttered, and white males would no longer take any crap from anyone. Whether it is vampire elderly trying to suck our lifeblood to squeeze out another few years of their prune-juice lives, or feminazis trying to push us out of existence and deprive us of any meaningful role but sex toy (or will even that be soon gone and lesbianism the sensible replacement for all women?), none of them have the guts or the psyche to fight and kill their way to their desires. All they ever knew how to do was vote and whine. We were stupid enough to let them vote, and we were stupid enough to listen to them whine and actually feel sorry for all their imagined woes, while ignoring our very own chains -- by the time the revolution occurs, those mistakes will be long gone, and our enemies will therefore be utterly powerless and ready to accept the new deal we give them.

What about the outside world? Would they take kindly to this type of maneuver? Certainly not, but then, what are they going to do about it? Supposing we reclaim the entirety of the USA through this lightning ambush, we would gain alongside it a giant nuclear arsenal that could easily keep the world at bay, and the natural resources to weather any amount of sanctions and trade boycotts they could attempt. Supposing we even claimed a few states that happened to include nuclear silos or reactors, the truth would still stand -- no one who didn't want to evaporate into a mushroom cloud would have much chance to say anything to us. In the end, the facts on the ground rule world diplomacy. No one's invaded North Korea yet, have they? And yet a white nationalist revolution would be far larger, more populous, and more heavily nuclear armed than North Korea can ever dream of.

I like this scenario the best, because it doesn't rely on our enemy decaying to nothing without any effort on our part, and it doesn't rely on miracle technologies that we may never receive. Like I say, what's holding this plan back most is the fact that most white males, as foolish as it is, still believe in the macho self-reliance way, and think anyone who can't hack it, is just a loser they have no sympathy for. White males, when they do fail, blame themselves instead of anyone else, even though affirmative action is so obviously, blatantly set against them. White males still feel so much empathy for their crying grannies and whiny women, that they strive to do anything they can to please them, even though it's obvious neither group has ever once thought of us or tried to alleviate our pain. ((Whites have a higher suicide rate than blacks, young people have a higher suicide rate than old people, and males have a suicide rate 4 TIMES as high as females, and yet all you EVER HEAR is whining, endless WHINING, from blacks, grannies, and women about how we men have to do more for them and are oppressing them!)) White men have a head full of stupid and a heart full of lovey-dovey soapy nonsense, and this will continue for quite a while. They are also the most deadly force on earth, and I for one would never want to go up against them. So long as their heads and hearts are full of cobwebs, the whole project of violent revolution is a non-starter. But someday it will change. I think it's already changing. I think Obama is full of 'hope' and 'change,' the hope and change I want to see, and I hope many of his successors keep piling it on just like this, all across the world.

Someday the white lion will roar.

THE BEGINNINGS (Kipling)
(1915, published 1917)

It was not part of their blood,
It came to them very late,
With long arrears to make good,
When the Saxon began to hate.

They were not easily moved,
They were icy — willing to wait
Till every count should be proved,
Ere the Saxon began to hate.

Their voices were even and low.
Their eyes were level and straight.
There was neither sign nor show
When the Saxon began to hate.

It was not preached to the crowd.
It was not taught by the state.
No man spoke it aloud
When the Saxon began to hate.

It was not suddenly bred.
It will not swiftly abate.
Through the chilled years ahead,
When Time shall count from the date
That the Saxon began to hate.

The Devil's Bargain:

First, everyone should read this link, another fine article by the BNP displaying exactly what the white race is facing, and how inherently unjust it is for everyone but whites to have the right to their own territory, government, and existence. I don't really believe in natural rights falling from the sky and pelting people on the head in order to remind them to be good boys and girls, that's a fairy tale dream. Any rights we have, exist only by our willingness through violence to enforce them, and the only judiciary third worlders will ever obey is the law of the gun. However, so long as we are going to pretend that these rights exist, they should apply to everyone equally, including the white race. The liberal viewpoint is inherently contradictory:

http://bnp.org.uk/2009/08/who-are-the-minorities/

It should be obvious to anyone that either war or extinction is coming. That there is no democratic or peaceful solution to the problems outlined in that article. Nationalist parties have failed to generate enough public approval and time has run out for the white race. The next generation has already been born, our supplanters are almost entirely third world, and most of the births even in white homelands are actually from third world immigrants, not ourselves. For kids in the 0-5 range in the USA, for instance, the majority are non-white. True Americans are therefore incapable of garnering majority approval or democratic power after the next three elections or so. Given that we whites decided to elect a communist racist mulatto illegal alien to be our president, and given that the Republican party refuses to represent white people's interests so there is no legitimate alternative to Obama, I don't have much faith that the next three election cycles are going to suddenly wise up and stop this nonsense while we still can.

Furthermore, the white race continues to subsidize and pay for the birth rates of the third world, and continues to allow excess population to immigrate to our own territory, thus allowing for the population growth of a planet already groaning over an unsustainable population to skyrocket endlessly. In 2000 there were 6 billion people on earth, by 2012 there will be 7 billion. What idiot thought this would be a good thing? How are the six billion current inhabitants helped by being crowded in with this next billion? Did we find a billion people's worth of extra oil laying around? Extra steel? Extra farmland? Extra city streets? Extra water? Extra anything? No, we just crowded them in, overburdened our infrastructure and environment, and hoped it would somehow magically work out. Of course it hasn't worked out. We are in a worldwide depression and it's obvious to anyone that the idea of 'perpetual growth' hasn't worked. Only birth control and eugenics can save the third world from itself, and us from the third world. Every other policy spells doom for the entire planet and a depression unlike anything we see today -- the return of a dark age where technology is no longer maintained or invented, and thus can no longer bear the load of an ever increasing BEAST of perpetual breeding, followed by a world war over the last remaining resources and civilized territories (China?) which could well end in nuclear annihilation of the majority of mankind.

It sounds like science fiction, neh? And yet, just re-read the link, and you tell me where the world is supposed to fit all of our newborn mud people all over the earth. You tell me how non-existent white populations are supposed to take care of Africans after we are dead and gone, who meanwhile have tripled in size since their last Ethiopian famine without any corresponding increase in productivity. The logic is inexorable.

How have people been lulled into putting up with this? How is it that an entire race, a billion people, could be hoodwinked into signing away their very existence on this earth, in just a couple hundred years?

Obviously there will always be liars ready to take advantage of the gullible, groups seeking their own self-interest at our expense. But that's only natural, and given the uncaring and evil-rewarding nature of evolution, we can hardly sulk or pout that it isn't right or fair. Of course it isn't right or fair, but that's the way it is. A people who does not develop a physical self-defense will be invaded and brutalized. A people who does not develop a mental self-defense will be deluded and brainwashed. Given these circumstances, it's up to us to develop the mental and physical power necessary to defend ourselves. It really isn't that hard -- after all, every other country on earth isn't facing an extinction level crisis. It's only us. We're the weakest people on earth -- of course we're being picked on. Who wouldn't? On general principles, simply for being the sniveling cowards we are, I'd join in and hit the white race a couple times too!

My suggestion is that whites long ago made a bargain with the devil: Peace and Prosperity today, take my soul tomorrow! This was all the easier given they wouldn't actually have to face the consequences of their actions. When's the last time parents cared about the fate of their children or grandchildren? The divorce and illegitimacy rates show how little they care, their politics is just one more symptom of their utter disregard for the future and utterly selfish lives. Just look at this doomsday clock:

http://www.usdebtclock.org/

The numbers are astronomical. These are all decisions made by parents that give present-day benefits for future costs:

12 trillion dollar national debt.
7 trillion dollar personal debt.
12 trillion dollar federal bailouts.
300 billion a year tax cost servicing interest on the national debt.
216 billion trade deficit this year.
59 trillion dollars of unfunded liabilities.

Who in their right mind thinks we can pay for these things? Or thinks we have any moral duty to pay for these things? Why should one person get benefits and another pay the costs? Why should children be saddled with their parents and grandparents outrageous medical costs? Why should children have to pay the national debt our parents borrowed? We never agreed to these policies, we never voted them in, and yet we still have to pay the taxes that fund them? Due to this massive hoodwink, our ancestors have sold us all down the river for their short stay in paradise.

Because the true cost of massive non-white immigration is loss of territory and government control, and that cost has not yet been paid, the current generation can enjoy all the benefits of massive non-white immigration (cheap labor) while we pay all the costs (annihilation.) This is yet another shell game earlier generations have played with us, leaving us to pick up the tab, the moment when the shit really hits the fan, while basking in their private yachts or private swimming pools or whatever old people do as they celebrate our doom.

Because the true cost of resource depletion is only paid when we actually run out, current generations can enjoy the most wasteful extravagance imaginable, leaving us to pay the bill. If they want to use up all our oil without building any nuclear plants, if they want to water their golf courses or irrigate rice in the middle of deserts, they see no reason why not. After all, you can't bring the world's natural resources with you after death, so we may as well destroy them all while we're alive, right? Let's not let a single fish swim in the sea past our 90th birthday, so long as it means one more seafood salad for us! Therefore it is our generation that has to face the crisis of global warming (if it's true), water depletion, peak oil, runs on all of our remaining metals, animal extinction, and lord knows what.

Because the true cost of illegitimacy and divorce spirals through generations of maladaptive behavior that in turn influences THEIR kids and THEIR kids, parents have gained all the benefits of an individualist and free-wheeling romantic life, and left all the costs to their children to try and pick up the pieces. Despite the hundreds of studies showing it is better for children to have a mother and a father, the majority of children no longer receive this -- their most basic right and due in life.

I'm sure I could go on and on, but I've made my point. Whites have made a deal with the Devil. They have found a way to carve out their own personal pleasure on this earth, and they have thrown everyone else to the wolves. As a massive voting block which, in a democracy, always gets its way, this generation of older whites always outnumbers the children who aren't even allowed to vote, and the 20's and 30's crowd who can never outvote the 40's+. It's like spitting into a hurricane, casting a vote on election day. You know full well who is going to receive all the money, all the benefits, and all the laws -- that aged granny over there with a cane.

There is no reason why we must honor the agreements of our parents or grandparents. There is no reason we have to pay the Devil's Bargain. If we resort to the true tabernacle, the rule of the gun, I'd like to see the elderly enforce their god damned policies of overspending, overtaxing, overcrowding and overconsuming everything that isn't bolted down to the ground. The law is not determined by voting blocks. It will always ultimately boil down to the number of young men of military age who are willing to FIGHT for their country.

Long ago Thomas Paine wrote in the Rights of Man that the living are not beholden to the contracts of the dead, that we are not some sort of ghost empire where justice and antiquity are synonymous. We don't have to pay these debts, any of them. We don't have to keep these immigrants our parents let in, any of them. We don't have to fund social security, medicare, or the prescription drug benefit. We don't have to continue fighting the wars they got us into, or hold the same moral precepts they do, or retain a constitution or government inherently flawed that got us here. Universal Democracy in America has only lasted for around 80 years, and look where it's brought us. It's an obviously failed model, far worse than the republic that came before it, with limited voting rights, and probably even the Republic was far worse than what we could think up now, in a more modern and enlightened age. Every legacy they have left us, we have no reason to accept. If we do, we accept our extinction -- it is the inevitable result of their legacy, the legacy of unthinking selfishness that asked only for money, power, security, do-gooder wishy-washy self-ennobling altruistic highs, immortality and conspicuous consumption to stroke their egos -- the whole damned Devil's Bargain from top to bottom.

Someday the debt clock should read, from top to bottom, one giant line of $0's.

Someday we must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children, our own homeland as outlined by the very UN as our natural right to have and to hold, in perpetuity.

Someday our environment should be sustainable and our children should inherit the same opportunities as we ourselves enjoyed, in terms of jobs, living space, water, climate, health, and everything else.

Someday the world's population must be controlled and shrunk back to a sane level -- in 1950 it was 2 billion -- in less than one lifetime, look what a monster it has become, a monster that benefits no one -- not those here today, not those who are to come.

Someday we must take a hard look at the religions, politics, and traditions handed down to us by our ancestors, and eliminate all of the harmful, irrational, and destructive beliefs they either imagined up or themselves inherited from the Dark Age's of the past.

Someday we must return to the nuclear family, and an economy that justifies and supports the nuclear family, so that all our children can have a mother and a father.

Every single thing wrong with the earth, is the responsibility of those humans who came before us. We aren't to blame for any of it, and we don't have to put up with any of it. Any generation that wishes, can make a clean break with the past, and with the generations still living, but already undead ghouls due to their life of feeding like cannibals off the corpses of the future for their own present gain. We have the right and the duty to do so, if we are going to preserve anything good on this Earth -- if we love anything or anyone at all.

Towards a New Education:

Education is perhaps the most critical activity in life, competing only with pair-bonding. Between reproduction and child rearing, everything else is practically a footnote. The money people make in all their various jobs is simply to fund reproduction and child rearing (from an evolutionary and thus, healthy point of view), and a full half of the world's population was, until recent times, devoted solely to this task (for good reason, since it was the most important task worthy of said devotion). Just as it would be criminally insane to neglect the reproductive process by allowing anyone to willy-nilly mate and have offspring, regardless of the likely genes they will pass on to their kids, without any attempt to improve the next generation through various advantageous genes that give them mental and physical health, high IQ, good looks and so on -- it would be criminally insane to neglect the education and rearing of our children once they are born.

Of course, in modern America, we manage to do both.

Not for lack of funds. Currently our schools are aflush with more money than they've ever had before. Nor for lack of trying, endless 'bold' and 'innovative' education systems are implemented across America, with cadres of loyal and impassioned teachers ready to teach them. Sadly, all of this money and all of this energy goes to waste, for lack of knowledge.

As the quote goes, 'My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.'

I have already addressed the need for eugenics. Any society not willing to cull its runts and reward its champions is doomed to degeneration and ultimately death. There is no future for the white race, or humanity, without the re-implementation of eugenics, the same science we have used since the beginning on all of our animals and crops to produce the wondrous results we have today from them. The same science Spartans and Romans took as a matter of course and our own Supreme Court justices agreed with not so long ago ("Three generations of idiots is enough.") Corn and apples didn't start off the way we see them today, they were generally a few inches in size, tasted terrible, were impossible to harvest and so on. Careful cultivation of the traits we found most desirable in these crops rewarded us over thousands of years, until we see the enormous, sweet, seedless apples that appear at our supermarkets today. Eugenics works. We know it works. And we use it everywhere around us, our whole society is built upon it, from our pet dogs to our steak dinners. To not apply it to the most critical life form of all, humanity, is cruelty to those who should never have been born, and cruelty to all those who must live around them and absorb their external costs from being born. It is not good for anyone, when net negative life is brought into this world. When someone can expect a short, diseased, demented, or dull life of pain, rejection, failure, and frustration, you are not protecting them. You are not giving them the 'gift' of life, but only the curse of existence. If you love life, you would spare them this fate -- and spare all of their family members, neighbors, and countrymen from having to endure their costs they impose on others. A mother with three healthy children and one insane child, has no time or energy for the three healthy children to spare. She will have to constantly put up with things most people never face in their lives, and she has to endure the heartbreak of loving someone doomed to pain and death. Due to motherly instincts, she might well want to sacrifice herself, her family, and the entire nation for the sake of this one insane child -- but that doesn't mean her choice is rational or right. A utilitarian has to know where to draw the line for the greater good, such emotions are luxuries we simply cannot afford.

Marriages break up over problem children. Other children are neglected. Millions of dollars are spent trying to fit them into the outside world, money that could have been spent on completely healthy kids and paved their roads to good fortune. And no, we cannot spend infinite money on both the 'healthy' and the 'unhealthy' kids, there is a limited amount of money, and there is a limited number of kids on earth. Even if we had a million dollars for every single healthy child alive (which we don't), that would still not imply we could afford a dysgenic birth -- because we could always have a new, healthy kid instead and give the money to THAT child. A child who will now never be born, because the money is lost forever.

Therefore, before addressing a new education plan, we must first lay down the iron law of eugenics -- no insane people, no retards, no congentinally handicapped, no criminal psychopaths, or whatever will even be entering the system in the future. They will be weeded out before birth. Either through screening and abortion, or simply not granting certain parents the right to breed for fear of the results, we Will ensure the quality of our children's genes. We will not give them the curse of existence -- every child born will be born with the gift of life.

Furthermore, I have no real interest in crafting an education plan that would work in a multi-racial multicult. It has problems we have no reason to be dealing with, and would be utterly insane to agree to deal with. Stupid third worlders, or simply alien minded Asians, will of course need a different school system than whites, because they are different and a different environment is best for every different genome. People with different religions, nationalities, belief systems and languages cannot be educated in the same classrooms about the same things -- everyone's interests and world views are so fractured, that no single education program could possibly benefit them all. There is no point in having kids if we cannot raise them to be like ourselves -- parents have a right to raise their children, to have allies in their children, to love their children and be loved by their children, to have children inherit the best in their parents, and not some foreign influence that like a cuckoo bird has the parents do all the work but the alien meme gain all the benefits thereof. Therefore the education program MUST be suited to reinforcing children with the knowledge and character that their parents wish them to have, something utterly impossible in a multiracial multicult.

If a child wishes to rebel against their parents, shave their heads, put on some robes, stop eating meat, and sing Hare Krishna for the rest of their lives -- fine. But they can do it after they leave the home and after their parents stop supporting them financially and through their time and energy. The school system will have no part in it, nor will their childhood have any part in such acts of defiance. Adults are at least owed this much by society for the sacrifice and effort they've made into giving us our new generation. Plus, it takes a pretty sickly culture, to not even want to see itself replicated into the future, or inherited by anyone. If our children do rebel, it should be seen as a tragedy, not a triumph. We should certainly not be co-conspirators to our own annihilation. If nothing of ourselves is passed down to our kids, then we really will die. Forgotten forever. That's not something we should be wishing on ourselves, or helping make possible, even if it is unavoidable.

A great deal of our educational woes could be fixed by just these two measures, eugenics and homogeneity. A school where parents can without fear send their kids, knowing that they will still be their kids when they get back home -- that they won't have been insulted, raped, or sold drugs during class -- that they haven't been taught homosexuality is healthy and normal at their age -- that no one made them feel guilty for who they are or the color of their skin -- that their kids are safe in society's hands while they are away.

However, this is just the beginning. We need nothing less than a complete re-invention of the purpose and nature of education, if we truly wish to fulfill our duty to our children -- and the society these children will soon be unleashed on and inherit. First off, there is only one job for a child, and it is a worthy job -- more worthy than any job anyone works on earth: The child is the father of the man.

Every day, every hour, children are developing themselves into tomorrow's adults. Tomorrows workers, tomorrow's parents, tomorrow's spouses, tomorrow's everything. As children start off with intelligence less than a dog, zero knowledge, zero ability to communicate, they can't even sit up or roll over, and are even incapable of digesting any food save milk for the first six months, children clearly have a long way to go between birth and full societal functionality. Every time a child bridges that gap, a near miracle has occurred on earth. A herculean, titanic task only ignored due to its commonality is carried out, something that far dwarfs the work parents are doing in those same twenty years. I don't care how hard what an adult is doing -- they're hardly learning how to walk, eat, speak, see, deal with other people, increasing their IQ tenfold, increasing their muscles tenfold, developing their ability to reproduce through huge hormonal influxes and bodily transformations, downloading the acquired wisdom and knowledge of all human history, and so on.

Adults should not boast of all the work they do while complaining about how easy kids have it -- it is precisely the opposite, even before school was invented to add even more burdens to a child's life. We have it easy, they're the ones struggling to even walk and talk, they're the ones jumping for joy for having reached something way up high, they're the ones who start off with zero friends and zero lovers to share the burden with -- they're the ones who must somehow acquire everything -- they're the ones born naked into this world -- and they're the ones helpless to protect themselves, should anyone seek to hurt instead of help their growth. Don't ever take a child's burdens lightly.

It is important to then realize that what a child needs, what is so crucial adults provide, is Help in fulfilling their task.

A child born among wolves will never raise himself. He will be semi-retarded, wild, with no language, a wretched immune system and no ability to learn even if he is adopted later. Children need us, they need us because they're accomplishing something impossibly hard, and what they need from us is to help them accomplish their one and only mission: to become men. Does this sound obvious or silly? Sadly, it's not obvious -- because in this very world, today, we have completely refused to help them in this task. If we had, we would've adopted the Montessori Method long ago. Instead our only advice for kids is to sit down, shut up, hurry up, and leave us alone.

Kids are not meant to sit down. They are not meant to sit in classrooms 8 hours a day every day. They are meant to be running around, climbing things, throwing things, developing their bodies, their motor skills, and their senses. They KNOW what they are meant to do, they have the instinctive desire to do it, they are only happy when they are developing themselves. But every time they try, every time they fidget or even ask to go to the bathroom, we slam down on them and tell them they are wicked, stupid, and evil for trying to move, and order them to return to their chair (Prison) immediately.

Kids are not meant to shut up. They are meant to be constantly practicing their language skills, to be in constant social communication to learn how to fit in to the wider world and associate with strangers, to make friends, to fall in love, and to express their wants and needs to their elders. They KNOW what they are meant to do, they have the instinctive desire to do it, they are only happy when they are developing these skills. But every time they try, every time they chat or ask for your attention, we slam down on them and tell them they are wicked, stupid and evil for trying to talk, and order them to return to silence (Prison) immediately.

Kids are not meant to hurry up. They are meant to be constantly practicing the skill or task they are focused on. They are meant to elongate all their measures so that they can understand each part separately, they are meant to repeat the same actions over and over because they don't perfectly grasp them the first time, they are meant to wander off and do constantly different activities than the one you originally tasked them to do that catch their attention, because they are difficult or new and thus demand their attention. Every time we force a child to hurry up, they completely lose track of what they were doing, they lose the chance to develop themselves, to learn the new lesson they wanted to learn, and they grow petulant and unhappy. The cause of most tantrums and fights is the instinctual rebellion of the child when the parent will not let him carry out his primary mission -- to become the father of the man. If it takes a long time for a child to put on his clothes or tie his shoes or sound out a word or spell or go on a walk or anything else -- LEAVE HIM ALONE. He's doing something critically important -- something far more important than you are doing, whether you're a nuclear physicist or whatever, he is creating an adult human being ex nihilo, he is the closest thing to God on this earth -- so you can just wait.

Children need order to learn. If their home environment, or school environment, is constantly and bewilderingly changing around them, they will never get a proper sense for things. Children want to go somewhere, come back, and find all the objects still in their place. This is why they love the game of peekaboo. Every time you cover your face, and then reveal it as being the exact same as when the face 'left,' the child is delighted to see this principal of order, of meeting expectations, being met. How many parents are providing this for their kids? Of course, on the opposite side, are the parents who make their homes prisons, where a child is not allowed to touch anything because they will 'mess it up.' And yet, it is the child's home as much as your own! His unhappiness matters as much as yours, his work is as valuable as yours, and he never chose to be born -- you chose for him to be born. You can not bring life into this world, and then resent them for living in it. Sorry, no.

A child needs objects suited just for them. I do not mean toys. I mean plates, silverware, and furniture that is their size and can be used by them. I mean rooms they can do what they like in. I mean objects they are allowed to carry, chores they are allowed to help their parents complete -- like cooking or setting the table or cleaning or feeding the pet. Children cannot be exiled from their own homes, with nothing suited to them. Children need their own games, books, and materials that can occupy their minds while at home -- no different from their parents watching the tv or on the computer. Children need safe streets, siblings, or neighbors they can run outside to play with. Children need their parent's attention and the right to be listened to and watched and praised. This stuff should be obvious -- but how many kids actually receive these things? Why is it any wonder so many grow up so dysfunctional??

Once children have settled into a school and met friends, it is cruel to move and disrupt this orderly routine. It destroys all their hard work and it may not even be possible to repair. Once children love and need their parents, it is cruel to divorce or introduce new ones. It destroys their trust and imperils them whenever someone unrelated is in the home. How many children are hurt every year by parents' selfishness? Where is the conscience of our society, who can hurt them so often with never so much as an apology for what we've done?

The first step for education is to provide an orderly home and school environment, one without crime, without divorce, without constant uprooting, without tv as the substitute parents at home, and so on. A hands on parenting system, ideally with a mother IN THE HOME (and yes, a mother, a father is not biologically suited to the task and will fail if they try.) A child could really use siblings to share their living space with, and have minds more closely in tune with their own, that can understand and enjoy their company -- and using eugenics that disallows the birth of some people, we can easily allow for families to have 3, 4, or more kids in the families that will work and do provide a good home environment. Having a single child is in itself child abuse. It was never intended in nature -- being alone is about the worst thing that can ever happen to you -- and a child whose mind works differently from an adult's, is always alone no matter how many adults he's around.

Now let's say we finally get them into school. As far as I'm concerned, there is nothing more I can say than adopt the Montessori system. They have perfected the early education of children and doing anything else than what they say is foolish and destructive. I will therefore skip ahead, leaving childhood education to the geniuses who have explored that field, and trust our kids to them.

I do have some ideas for later education, however, that might not yet have been instituted. (Say, 10 years of age up) The four complaints children generally have about school are these:

1. They never get enough sleep.
2. They are worked too hard.
3. Everything they do is pointless.
4. No one respects them.

Children are 100% right about all four. This is a tragedy, considering, yet again, that children are doing the hardest and most miraculous work out of all of us. There are some easy fixes we can make so that school can be a happy place, a place they look forward to, a gift we give to our children and a helpmate to their task of self-development.

We will solve the sleep problem! Sleep deprivation is torture. Not only is it a large factor to straight unhappiness, it slows growth, makes people sick, fat, irritable, and dull. Even if they are slightly sleep deprived, the effects mount over time, and of course if they are continuously sleep deprived they will go insane. This helps no one, they hardly learn better in a state of complete zombiehood. Nor are they to blame. For one thing, people can't control when they get sleepy and when they want to wake up, it is an internal biological clock telling them these things. Second, there is no way on earth for a child to do all his schoolwork, all his homework, and all his chores -- and get enough sleep. Children need more sleep than adults, 10 hours is not in the least too much, but especially as teenagers, they are lucky to get 6 -- or even 4. Certainly, a child can blow off all their homework, sleep through class, and therefore solve their problem -- but then they are yelled at and flunked and grounded by their parents, etc, etc. A choice between scylla and charybdis is no choice at all.

In order to give children the sleep they need, we will have two classes every day, a morning class and an evening class. Morning class will go from 9am to 3pm. Evening class will go from 5pm to 11pm. The classes will be the same. Every day, children can attend either the morning or the evening class, and will count as having attended for that day. They are not required to attend all morning classes or all evening classes -- the flexibility is there for a reason. Supposing a child falls asleep at 8am, he can still make it to evening class with 8 hours of sleep. Supposing the child falls asleep at 12am, he can still make it to morning class with 8 hours of sleep. What a godsend! You can sleep when you are sleepy, and wake up when you aren't sleepy --- AND MAKE IT TO CLASS.

How did I shave off 2 hours of school? Simple -- take out lunch and recess, let kids drink and snack during class, there is no reason people can't eat and listen to a teacher, or drink and read a textbook, or solve problems while sucking on a peppermint. The whole situation is artificial, a sop to the teachers wishing to make their lives easier, instead of to the kids who are truly working the hard job -- and aren't getting paid a dime for it. Take out PE or other useless electorals the kids don't want, like art. If they want to pursue a hobby, they can always do so outside of class -- if you just give them the time by not filling it all up with school. I can also save everyone time by giving people a single Kindle, instead of a dozen books, and thus remove their need to visit any lockers. This also removes the need for people to switch classrooms. If anyone should switch classrooms, it should be the teachers only. If people need to go to the restroom, they should be allowed to go, no questions asked. Without blacks and hispanics mucking up the system, we can trust our children to not be smoking or screwing the moment they're out of side -- and raised originally in the montessori system, their self-discipline will already be top notch. Furthermore, by tracking students by IQ, we can surround them with people of like intelligence and give them tasks equal to their minds. This would eliminate all the wasted time spent trying to help a particularly remedial student to catch up with the rest of the class. Bam! Time savings, and a lot of boredom saved too. Also, a lot more friendships will be made when people are around people like themselves -- and lovers -- a good thing since there is no reason for marriage to wait past peak fertility and peak eugenic health of said fertilized eggs (teens, early 20's).

When these kids, who are always fully rested at school, get home from a less draining six hours of high mental effort, they can relax in the same way adults can -- their job is done for the day and they don't have any homework. Why should an indignity no adult is willing to undergo, working once they've finally gotten home (or if they do work at home, they make sure to get highly recompensed for it), be visited universally on all of our kids? If you can't teach them enough during class, save it for tomorrow. Like I said in the beginning, with children, there should be no such word as hurry up. They won't have to stay up trying to write out some essay for the next ten hours because they can't think of anything to say until the school bell rings again demanding their attendance. They can just go to sleep, knowing their job is done, and they can take pride in what they achieved or learned that day.

I know one worry parents have with this flexible schedule is kids will be home without them, or it will be difficult to transport their kids to school, and so on. But you are forgetting a critical part of this thought experiment: Mothers should be staying at home in the first place, there is no crime on our streets because eugenics because white separatism has already saved us from that blight, and children have older siblings, or simply the good example of Montessori schooling to make them eminently capable of handling themselves while you're gone. If a child needs to reach school, they could simply ride there on their bikes -- NOTHING WILL HAPPEN TO THEM AND NO ONE WILL HURT THEM. It's the miracle of a truly white world, something we should reclaim as the birthright of every child.

We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. The ability for teens to sleep a healthy 8 hours a day is just one benefit of such a bright new world. :).

Therefore problems 1 and 2 are solved. The next issue is number 3: Everything they do is pointless. I have hoped to change that by IQ tracking, so that children are actually learning at a rate suited to them (and thus, developing themselves into a man, the goal and desire of all children, and the one thing that makes them happy, truly happy, ie content, satisfied, fulfilled.) However, it isn't just the difficulty of the material that is at issue, but the very nature of the material as well. Most kids learn junk that they later instantly forget, or topics that even their parents know nothing about and discarded decades ago. Whether it is science, math, or history, children feel it has nothing to do with them, it's all bullshit, and that it exists solely to plague them and employ teachers who really aren't teaching a single thing of use or interest.

One thing we should seriously consider is ending school at around age 14, and letting children get on with their lives by becoming apprentices to some job or other. Teenagers are not meant to sit around forever -- at least many of them are thoroughly sick of the routine. For those academic types who never met a calculus problem or poem they didn't love, school could continue. But there's no reason every child has to keep attending. The basics are done, they can read and write and add and subtract, they can work together with others and filter the essence of what someone is saying from all the dross. They can tell right from wrong, and true from false -- and that's the most vital education anyone can ever have.

With that in mind, a high school education need not be 'pointless' like it so often is today. I don't think it's pointless to read a book you love, learn from the author some important truth, then communicate that truth you learned to your classmates and friends in an excited and revelatory manner. I'd say instead, that's about the high point of life -- the very meaning of existence. There are endless books and material that provide just these sorts of experiences. It doesn't even have to be a book -- it could be a go board, a tennis ring, a classical orchestra piece you have to help play with your violin, or a national science quiz held at the capital with all the best schools fielding their best. My point is the same, there is still so much wonder to be had at school -- beauty, truth, and love. Friends, dates, or that all so important crafting of identity -- who you are, where you came from, what you'd like to see the world become. An education that allowed students to pursue these interests, while not forcing them to pursue their non-interests, is more beneficial to all parties. Teachers enjoy students who enjoy what they are being taught. Students enjoy teachers who teach something they enjoy. This shouldn't be such a hard pairing to make. There is no reason for our young adults to be pursuing anything else but a meaningful existence and a self-development they can endorse and embrace into their hearts. I know what I was doing, whenever I was allowed to read a book of my choice -- Russian Literature. I read the entirety of War and Peace for one essay, and the entire Gulag Archipelago for another. Aimlessness was hardly the result, I worked twice as hard as I would have been forced to, because I loved the work so much. Why not give all children that chance? Or at least the high IQ ones we've already tracked to be together thus far??

There are tons of things worth learning, in a future white nation, I would dearly hope some portion of this will be history and philosophy that improves and strengthens children's indoctrination into the beliefs of their parents. I want children proud of their heritage and determined to fulfill it in their lives and their children. I will settle for nothing less, nor should any of us. As the saying goes, the next revolution is forever.

Let's make sure we teach white history, white culture, white values, and white pride in our school system, from age 5 all the way to 18, and in a way they'll enjoy and with the honesty that never comes off as 'phoney', that dreaded word from Catcher in the Rye, which realistically showed a child's complete contempt for the society of his age. ((A contempt I share!)) Let's banish the holocaust, sex ed, recycling and global warming crap forever. Children will believe anything they're told, but they hate being lied to or manipulated -- it is a precious trust we'll only have once. Let's teach them the truth and nothing but the truth, so help us God.

For the last part, the solution is simple. Let's honor the work our children are doing every day. Let's not measure it by grades, or by chores, or by the number of times they say 'sir' or 'ma'am.' Let's measure it by the best measure we have: their own happiness and satisfaction with who they are and what they've become. Most children today are desperately unhappy, whether they have A's or not. They are telling us, either silently or forthrightly, every day how failed our system is. Artificial measures from outside are never as good as Nature's own -- instincts exist for a reason, evolution made us who we are for a reason. If your children are laughing, happy, and eager to talk to you about their days -- if they aren't slitting their wrists, drinking, or shooting something up -- we're on the right track towards a new education.

If our children are happy, we should be happy with them. And I mean happy, the whole shebang. Happy, content, proud, energetic, alive, satisfied. If our kids love themselves, we should love them too. If after 18 years, you still haven't shared with them your favorite music, books, food, movies and hobbies, and they're left with nothing to do all day but drink and sleep around -- then shame on you. Not on them. If our children leave the door with their heads held high, knowing right from wrong, and true from false, it doesn't matter how much money they make, or what job they get. We should respect every one of them, all the same. Every single child has earned their keep. It's the adults who rarely do. :P.

Questions [And Answers] for White Nationalism:

Earlier at Guywhite's site, I posted a rather lengthy comment because I wanted to know what he thought about these issues. I agree they are the trickiest questions in the white nationalist world, and that people of good character and sound thinking can have multiple and conflicting answers on any of them. I think I have an answer to these questions, but unlike more basic questions like 'what causes black crime?', I do not think I have all the answers, or that my answers are necessarily the Truth.

In case people were wondering though, I'll answer the questions in brackets, which was not included in my comment to Guywhite:






The Color of Crime and Hispanics: A Statistical Portrait available at Amren.com says basically all we need to know about blacks and hispanics.

Alternatively, people could read admirable books like IQ and Global Inequality, Race, Evolution, and Behavior, or The Bell Curve to learn the definitive science on the issue of whites vs. 'the rest of the world.' Rushton, Lynn, Jensen, and others have heroically researched and proven that IQ is the best predictor of a person's or nation's success, and that it is genetic and thus outside the reach of socialist reformers.

The arabs, pakistanis, and persians have a double whammy of low IQs and one of the worst cultures/religions on earth. It is obvious they are a menace to the outside world and a misery to themselves.

There is no need to belabor these issues because they are all clear as day for anyone to see who takes the most cursory interest in the field.

The only mysteries of racial thinking concern Jews, Whites and Asians.

I think the deepest mysteries about race are this:

1. Why are Asians, who are so smart, so prone to bad government and the resulting poverty?

[They are closer to a hive mind than the rest of humanity is, like ants and bees. They respect authority too much and groupthink leads to boxes of bad policies they cannot climb their way out of, for lack of any creative dissident pointing the way.]

2. Why are Asians, who have such low crime rates, so prone to cruelty, oppression, and genocide? (Japan vs. China, Mongols vs. the world, China under Mao, etc)

[Individual life means little to Asians, who think of things in terms of groups. The slaughter of 1/3 of Cambodia's population was quickly made up for by population growth in the following decades. If the new population is more politically ideal than the old one, what was the harm in it?]

3. Why are Asians, who are so smart, so under-represented in the fields of Human Accomplishment?

[They are not abstract thinkers. They never developed, for instance, the rules of geometry, which Euclid did in Europe before Christ, or tried to decipher the rule under girding the motions of the planets, like Newton and Kepler did after Christ. They just made mechanical birds and star charts instead. Abstract, creative thinking that deals with issues invisible to all but the mind's eye is the true fountainhead of greatness.]

4. Is there an environmental solution to the above problems facing Asians? If so, what? If it is genetic, could interbreeding Asians with whites or Jews remove those genetic disorders and create a superior breed of mankind?

[I think intelligence is fluid enough, and that furthermore whites have given them such a head start (by introducing them to abstract thinking, individual rights, the scientific method and so on), that Asians can take it from here. They could right all their wrongs just through a change in education and governmental policy. Asians are within striking distance, if they just don't mess up, of conquering the world and making it a wonderful place to live in besides.]
* * * *

1. Why are Jews, who are so smart, so prone to support bad governments and the resulting economic and political chaos?

[Because while it hurts everyone around them, it enriches and improves the fate of jews as a group. The only question they ever ask themselves is, 'Is it good for the jews?']

2. Why have Jews lived among whites for two thousand years, been hated and persecuted this entire time, but refuse to either a) leave or b) assimilate into the white race? Does any minority have a right to live alongside a majority while not assimilating to it?

[Starting with a religion hellbent on separatism and double standards, followed by hundreds of generations of intra-jewish breeding that relied on outwitting or somehow despoiling their goyim neighbors, Jews have both a genetic and cultural evolution towards parasitism and group conflict. The answer is no, minorities don't have a right to live among a group with which they have nothing in common.]

3. Why is it that whenever something really bad happens, a jew is nearby? ((1965 Immigration Act, Weimar Germany, Russian Revolution, fall of Constantinople, invasion of Spain.))

[It could be a coincidence, simply because jews are everywhere, in good times and bad, and we are simply magnifying the averse role of jews compared to other groups. Or more likely, because every single time jews decided these disasters would be 'good for the jews.']

4. Is there an environmental solution to the above problems facing Jews? If so, what? If it is genetic, could interbreeding with whites or Asians remove those genetic disorders and create a superior breed of mankind?

[There doesn't seem to be any environmental solution. Jews are stubborn and headstrong, and refuse to ever take responsibility for their actions or apologize to others for their wrongdoing. In addition, jews wield such power, that they are never even confronted or taught that what they are doing is wrong, so they blithely go on doing it without the intellectual/moral challengings that would lead to jewish enlightenment on these matters. I am heartened by jewish intermarriage rates, around 50% of all jews per generation are casting their jewishness aside, and most of those children go on to marry non-jews as well. This is the longterm genetic solution to the problem, which only a jewish resurgence in anti-miscegenation racism can now stop. Unfortunately, this long term solution will probably be too little too late for the white race, which is approaching its own endgame simultaneously.]
* * *

1. Are the whites of today in any sense related to the whites of our ancient and glorious past? Or is our generation the dysgenic and decultured remnants of our forefathers? More particularly, did some event like the urbanization of our population, the two World Wars, or modern technology create such a massive overhaul on our environment/gene pool, that it caused us to evolve towards an entirely different, and seemingly inferior, mold?

[I don't know what it is, but I do have a very strong sense that we are not what we used to be. Though soft-hearted universalism can be found in our earliest American and European thinkers, I can't imagine anyone in the past going to such lengths of self-destruction and self-excoriation as we have today, this is unprecedented in all of white history. The fact that sperm counts and male fertility amongst whites continues to decrease every generation points to a more primal explanation for the effeminate politics we have today.]

2. Given whites are the premier leaders of Human Accomplishment, why do we score lower than Asians and Jews on all the IQ tests, and why are we poorer, less represented in elite institutions and more prone to violent crime than the Jews and Asians who live among us?

[There is a nobility to the aryan mind not yet captured in IQ tests. It has little to do with raw processing power, and more with how we view the world and what seems beautiful and desirable to us. Our love of truth and fearless devotion to unpopular or unlikely causes is our greatest strength. No jew or Asian has ever nailed his objections to his church on the door with his name signed to it like Martin Luther. The offset to these advantages is we failed to develop the strengths the other races have, and don't seem to be effective in direct competition with them.]

3. What will become of the white race? We are the only race on earth threatened with extinction, because we are the only race on earth that has embraced its own extinction. ((Remember the people of Portland cheering when Bill Clinton announced America would soon be majority non-white?)) Is this strange white psychosis that stretches from New Zealand to Iceland, America to Brazil, and is absent from all other races, proof that we deserve to die?

[Ultimately, yes. Evolution is pitiless and I hardly wish to entrust the universe to a race so wishy-washy that it cannot even keep itself alive, reproduce at replacement levels, guard its own territory, have some pride in itself, and so on. If whites are destroyed, good riddance. Hopefully a remnant of a remnant that never bought into all this egalitarian heterogeneous nonsense will survive and restore the white race to its former glory. If whites do try to escape their doom with violent resistance at the last moment, expect the same story as WWII, a tiny but plucky nation taking on the entire world and ultimately doomed to defeat. It would have been better if we had resisted through a peaceful political process when we still had the chance -- in the 1960's. Now, as Yoda said, matters are worse.]

4. Is there an environmental solution to the above problems facing whites? If so, what? If it is genetic, could interbreeding with Jews or Asians remove those genetic disorders and create a superior breed of mankind?

[There are of course dozens of environmental solutions, starting with separatism, a retooling of our education system, a citizen's dividend, a return to gender norms and the centrality of the nuclear family, and so on. But without the political will to impose these environmental solutions, I see little solution but a giant genetic purging of all the fools who got us into this. Not by us, but by nature and the other races that are feeding on our corpse! Once they have stripped away all the dead wood, so long as racists have a fierce will to survive and carry on, they will one day be a polished diamond in both environment and genes. Perhaps by interbreeding with jews and asians, we could gain a little of their ruthlessness, clannishness, and intelligence, things we desperately need to survive in the modern age. But it can't be so much, that we lose the good traits we already have. It would have to be a very precise dosage indeed.]
* * *

Is all racial thinking irrelevant because soon genetic engineering will completely obliterate the current genetic distinctions between groups? Should we simply ignore race, sex, politics, religion, sexual orientation, ethnicity, and all other topics and become 'Futurists' who rely on a technological solution instead?

[Yes and no. When the futurist options become available, we should of course endorse them. But if they become available is a big question, as well as when. Meanwhile, we still have to survive to reach that day, and furthermore, we are surrounded by the suffering victims of the current era who get little consolation that hundreds of years from now everything will be alright. We are Gondor, technology is Rohan. Gondor had to fight every day to survive long enough for Rohan to arrive. If Gondor had not kept its mind on the present, its citizens would never have reached the future. There is no reason to abandon the fight just because Rohan is riding to our aid, in fact, that makes us have every reason to redouble our efforts and fight to the very last breath, because there is more hope that final victory will be ours in the end and it's not all in vain.]

What's Wrong with Argentina?

What's wrong with Argentina?

https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ar.html

GDP per capita (purchasing power parity): $14,200 (2008 est.)

This is tied with Mexico, and just behind Libya. Other luminaries that are richer than Argentina include Gabon, Malaysia, Croatia, and Oman.

Household income or consumption by percentage share:
lowest 10%: 1%
highest 10%: 35% (January-March 2007)

That produces a gini index score of 49, the 27th most unequal wealth in the world. First is Namibia, second is South Africa, and Zimbabwe barely squeaks ahead of Argentina at 24. Wealth inequalities such as these generally denote corruption and tyranny, but sometimes they are due to two hugely differing races with differing IQ and thus wealth-creating power inhabiting the same living space. Could that be Argentina's excuse?

Ethnic groups:
white (mostly Spanish and Italian) 97%, mestizo (mixed white and Amerindian ancestry), Amerindian, or other non-white groups 3%

Nope. Argentina is practically the whitest country on earth. 97% white! And the remainder are nearly half white! By God just look at that number. It's every white nationalist's dream. Heck, I'd be willing to include far more non-whites than 3%. There are no blacks driving down Argentina's economy, crime rates, unemployment, and so on. There are no evil muslim terrorists plotting bombings or airline hijackings. There are no sharia finance institutions or burqas assaulting women's rights. There are no hispanic gangs, drug problems, or illiteracy, everyone there speaks Spanish so there's no language barriers, and so on. Every single problem whites gripe about concerning minorities does not exist here. And yet for all that, Argentina is managing to TIE Mexico in GDP, have a less fair distribution of wealth than Mexico (a stratified society with whites at the top and hispanics underneath), have high unemployment, a shaky democracy constantly punctuated by dictatorial coups, and so on. What the hell is wrong with Argentina? There is not a single factor whites can pin on 'under-performing minorities' as the vector of this strangely demented and failed state.

But an antisemite wouldn't be surprised:

Religions:
nominally Roman Catholic 92% (less than 20% practicing), Protestant 2%, Jewish 2%, other 4%

Like every country infected with jews, Argentina is a basket case. Politically, economically, it tosses from crisis to crisis, all for seemingly no reason, but always somehow fitting jewish stereotypes.

"Argentina benefits from rich natural resources, a highly literate population, an export-oriented agricultural sector, and a diversified industrial base. Although one of the world's wealthiest countries 100 years ago, Argentina suffered during most of the 20th century from recurring economic crises, persistent fiscal and current account deficits, high inflation, mounting external debt, and capital flight. A severe depression, growing public and external indebtedness, and a bank run culminated in 2001 in the most serious economic, social, and political crisis in the country's turbulent history."



What happened? Why was such a seemingly wonderful country brought to its knees? Bank runs, hyperinflation, massive debt, horribly unequal wealth distributions -- why this sounds like the mirror image of Weimar Germany! Half a world away, across an ocean, it's as though the same exact narrative was playing out before our eyes! What could have possibly changed at the turn of the 20th century to bring about this sad, sad tale?

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/vjw/Argentina.html

"In the late 19th century, a third wave of immigration fleeing poverty and pogroms in Russia, and other Eastern Europe countries, moved to Argentina because of its open door policy of immigration. These Jews became known as "Rusos" and became active in Argentinian society."

"Between 1906 and 1912, Jewish immigration increased at a rate of 13,000 immigrants per year. Most of the immigrants were Ashkenazi Jews from Europe, but a number of Sephardic Jews from Morocco and the Ottoman Empire also settled in Argentina. By 1920, more than 150,000 Jews were living in Argentina."

Say no more! I think I'm getting the jist of it already. Jews had worn out their current hosts and sucked them dry, and were looking for new healthy prey that was still too naive to grasp the danger of allowing in this particular set of immigrants. This is the jewish modus operandi. Destroy your host nation, then immigrate to a country that hasn't recently felt your sting and can't connect the dots. Repeat. Eventually jewish malfeasance becomes such an ancient part of the country's history (like how in the UK jews had not been in the country for centuries before Cromwell invited them back in), that they forget all about it, see a bunch of poor innocent victims yearning to be free, and clasp them back to their bosoms like long lost brothers.

Now, people will say, correlation is not causation. A sudden influx of jewish immigrants leading to the fall of a great, prosperous, and all-white nation and then into a state of seemingly perpetual economic and political chaos, why, that could just be pure coincidence. Yes, maybe it could be. But at the same time, that implies there must be some other explanation for this sudden U-turn of Argentina's luck. And it can't be because of blacks, muslims, hispanics, or any of the traditional scapegoats jews like to wave in front of our eyes to divert our attention from the real problem. So what was it? Oh, I can hear the chant already: "We did it to ourselves!" Yes, all of a sudden, starting at the beginning of the 20th century, whites decided they didn't want to be a wealthy country, they wanted to be paying usurious debt fees on everything instead, debase their currency, and nationalize/destroy all of their savings. This is because the very nature of white genetics is always yearning and striving for these policies, from the year 2,000 BC starting in the first homeric epics to the modern age, all whites ever talk about is their love of usury, debasing currency, and bank runs. It's just such a natural and unchangeable aspect of our character, we can't drive it out no matter how far we run or wherever we hide on earth. Come on! Who does this sound like? Which stereotype does this fit? Which history of previous behavior does this fit? Which tribe does this more accurately describe?

If there is not a good chain of evidence connecting correlation to causation between the arrival of jews in Argentina, and the fall of Argentina's relative fortune vis a vis the world, there is an even LOOSER chain of evidence connecting a sudden white psychosis at the beginning of the 20th century, which would lead them to do all of this to themselves. For people interested in finding out the truth, occam's razor would at least give a provisional conclusion: "Between the two theories, the jews are more likely to deserve the blame." All it would take next is a simple social experiment, "Let's see what Argentina would look like without their jews," and if there's a sudden restoration of the economy, well, I guess the question is solved. Unfortunately, it is nearly impossible to conduct this experiment, and you can bet the forces of world jewry (international finance, international media, political influence) would be leveled on Argentina lickety split the moment Argentina ever tried such a thing. Therefore, we can never get a final answer on this question. All we can do is surmise, based on the facts we have before us, who exactly destroyed Argentina, and made a 97% white country, a place so brimming with potential that it could easily be the greatest nation on earth, equal to Mexico and worse than Libya.

Suicide or homicide? The same question we ask ourselves about Russia, Germany, Rome, the USA, South Africa and Eastern Europe, we could just as well ask about Argentina. But the one factor that never seems to change, is that the 'suicide rates' of white countries certainly shoots up, the day after they invite their jews in. If, magically, it really were the fault of whites, the conclusion would be the same: "Whites have a genetic weakness, the source of all our troubles. Yes, you see, we are allergic to jews! The moment we see a jew, walk by a jew in the street, or even hear a jew's voice, we fall into conniptions. And even though the jews are completely innocent and have never done anything wrong in their entire history, unfortunately, every single white nation they live within, automatically self-destructs. Therefore, due to our own weakness and unaccountable stupidity, we must ask jews to stay away and leave us alone! Just as the extreme weakness of bubble boys is surely to blame for all of a bubble boy's woes, the answer is still to keep all other people a safe distance away from bubble boys. Surely whites, even with this allergy to jews, still have the right to life? Surely we, who do so well whenever jews aren't arround, should not simply be eradicated for this in-all-other-ways-perfect genome that can handle anything else, but cannot handle being around jews, and spontaneously causes us to commit suicide the moment they appear?"

Whether jews have any malice, or even any blame at all for the destruction of the white countries within which they reside, is in the end irrelevant. All we have is a data set of white countries where, inevitably, the well being of whites falls as the population of jews in the country increases. For pro-white thinkers, this data set should speak for itself. There is no real reason to inquire into the causes or seek explanations or even to point the finger of blame -- the data set simply speaks for itself and the conclusion is obvious. Whites are at their best when jews are not around them, they can thrive perfectly well without jews. Whites are at their worst when around jews, they suffer the worst economic and political misfortunes and their culture degenerates into something much worse than what came before. With such a clear track record, the response is also clear -- WHETHER JEWS ARE TO BLAME OR NOT -- the jews must leave, so that we might live.

This is the advantage of results oriented thinking. We don't have to know the root causes of crime -- Chief Bratton with policing alone just reduced crime in Los Angeles by 50%. 50%! He cut crime in half, in a city that is increasingly poor, black, hispanic, unemployed, etc. This is because no matter who is to blame, or what caused it, a firm hand by the government can solve anything.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-legacy6-2009aug06,0,1853323.story

All we have to know is the solutions. The solution is obvious. The long tragedy of white-jewish coexistence, just like the long tragedy of white-gypsy coexistence, must come to an end, so that no more tragedies can ever occur again. We have enough cases, enough history, enough separate and yet clearly correlated events, that the conclusion is inevitable. We are no longer speaking about coincidences here, we are looking at a pattern -- a pattern of hate, violence, poverty, death and ruin that stretches back thousands of years. Enough is enough.

Deconstructing 'Reconquista'

First off, here's the link to the essay I'll be taking apart line by line, simply because it angers me too much to watch so many lies strung together in a row without anyone brave enough to challenge him on them. Since almost all anti-anti-semite arguments sound the same in the end, it's a good chance to address the entire boatload of these thinkers by attacking in detail a single version of their endlessly repeated nostrums. It's truly amazing how often people can connect all the dots when it comes to racism, but fail at the most crucial and important step. Is it truly ignorance? Or is it simply cowardice? I guess we'll never know.

In any event, the best way to address this essay is to simply interject my counter-arguments in brackets wherever I see he is going wrong, while allowing the speech to flow interrupted where I am uninterested or in agreement. So if it's not in brackets, it's his voice, when it is, it's my voice. Simple enough?:

http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2009/07/from-titans-to-lemmings-part-4.html

From Titans To Lemmings: The Suicide Of The White Race

By Reconquista

4. Slaying David, Crippling Britannia

Background

So far in this series of essays discussing the serious predicament the white race currently faces, I have tried to explain what I believe to be the lemming-like suicide of the white race and by lemming-like I am asserting that the white race is knowingly choosing to behave in ways which will assure its own destruction.

Central to the series is the way Marxist ideology has been embraced by the white race whose societies impose Multiculturalism and Liberalism in the trivial pursuit to establish equality between all races and all peoples. I have attempted to describe how these ideologies are being imposed upon white societies through the creation of numerous minority groups - e.g. blacks, asylum seekers, criminals, Muslims, homosexuals, women, animals, planet earth etc. - groups who are portrayed as oppressed victims of the powerful strong majority. [Who championed these minority groups? Who portrayed them as oppressed victims in the media? Who funded their campaigns for equality and liberation? How do powerless people overthrow the powerful oppressors? Wouldn't they need powerful allies, since they obviously were helpless and oppressed up until this point when left on their own?]

Multiculturalism and Liberalism is being forced upon white societies by force and by deploying a moral inversion that is fundamental to Christianity and identified by the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche whereby the strong and the powerful are always portrayed as immoral and the weak whereas the wretched and the oppressed are the moral and the good. Nietzsche described Christianity as "The religion of pity" because of this flaw and he predicted that the West - white societies - would abandon the Christian religion but cling steadfastly to this moral inversion of the weak and oppressed as being moral and noble.

I firmly believe Nietzsche's analysis of Christianity and his prediction of how the West would maintain the moral inversion he identified were both totally accurate and it is this pity for the weak that is enabling alien invaders to colonise and flourish throughout the West along with the destruction of traditional values and morals that once made the west so strong. [Strange that he ignores the part where Neitzsche denounces Christianity as the invention of jews full of ressentiment for being conquered by the Romans, and that Christianity was always designed as the spiritual revenge of world jewry on their Roman oppressors. Strange that he ignores the fact that Neitzsche hated jews and the Christian religion they created as a poison for the healthy and noble European west that existed until that time. I mean, if he fully agrees with Neitzsche, why exactly is he attacking anti-semites? Practically every important philosopher in European history has been anti-semitic, from Voltaire to Kant to Fichte. As far as trusting the word of the great philosophers of the past go, our conclusion should only be one thing -- in the company of such giants, far be it from us to disagree.]

But there is one minority group that is singled out as being the root cause of the West's problems. They are a minority group despised by Marxists and Liberals and, I'm sad to say, equally despised by a section of British Nationalists and other nationalist groups. The Marxists despise them for the very reasons I am describing in these essays, some Nationalists hate them for this reason too but they also hate them for a very different, convenient but ultimately self-destructive reason as we shall now see.

I am of course talking about the Jews and as a very proud, white British Nationalist who is absolutely fed-up of reading ill-informed, hate-filled and often asinine comments around British Nationalist blogs about Jews I believe it is now time for the various myths and excuses trotted out to justify Jew hatred to be challenged. [If only! The only myths and excuses trotted out are strawmen he finds useful to challenge and confront. The honest and actual reasons to hate jews are conveniently ignored, because he cannot refute them. Quite typical of anti-anti-semite arguing styles. Attack the weakest link -- ignore everything else.] Because if this nonsense continues it is going to damage British Nationalism and therefore, serve to promote the interests of all of the enemies who are destroying our land.

Know Your Enemy

So who are the enemies of Great Britain and how do British Nationalists empower our enemies by joining in with this nasty Jew hate-fest? It is vitally important to identify our enemies because if we do not correctly identify them then we handicap ourselves. Here in no particular order are the enemies who are busily destroying Great Britain along with other Western societies in the pursuit of their desire to first turn whites into a minority, then to wipe them out:

The Left - Marxists, Communists, Multiculturalists, Liberals, Socialists. Not all are malicious, along with the dyed-in-the-wool West-hating Marxist/Socialist raving red nutjobs are the well-meaning but totally misguided and terminally naive Liberals. Useful idiots who provide oxygen for the enemy, an enemy who will one day turn on them too. [Marx was a jew, as was Boaz, as was the Frankfurt School. The founders of leftism, marxism, socialism, egalitarianism, etc, were all jews and their main backers have always been jews. Jews voted 80% for Obama and funded over half the democratic party's campaign. Jews are directly responsible for Obama's victory, and the victory of the democratic party in general, and boast quite openly about this. It is absurd to say 'leftists, not jews are the enemy' because the terms are synonymous. Obviously when we speak in generalizations, we do not mean every single jew is a leftist marxist liberal, we just mean jews are the leadership and vanguard, the most powerful section of the leftist, marxist, liberal scene. Confronting the left without confronting jews would be like trying to sack everyone but the quarterback of the opposing team. That's a rather fruitless defense if you ask me.]

Islam - The goal of EVERY Muslim is to establish the single global ummeh - "fight the infidel until the world belongs solely to Allah" . There is nothing more they desire than the conquest of the West and they are prosecuting Islamic jihad in a number of ways both violent and non-violent. Islam has declared war on Great Britain - unlike Judaism - and presents perhaps the most serious threat to the entire West and and that includes Israel. [Islam, like Christianity, is an offshoot of Judaism and shares many of the same characteristics. Judaism says in the Talmud 'even the best of gentiles should be killed.' Islam likewise says 'slay the infidel wherever you find him.' The religious and racial hate of 'us against the entire world' is transferred perfectly between the two religions. The call for genocide of their enemies and their boasting of the massacres they did for their God and their religion are in both the old testament and the Koran. There is no point condemning Islam if you aren't equally willing to condemn Judaism. Half the Koran is practically ripped from the Bible/Talmud and inserted word for word. Why would people so evil as muslims rely so heavily on a judaic source? The answer is obvious, they're peas in a pod. Here is Menechim Begin's dream of a world jewish caliphate:

"Our race is the Master Race. We Jews are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves."

(Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin in a speech to the Knesset quoted by Amnon Kapeliouk, Begin and the Beasts," New Statesman, June 25, 1982)

Hard to tell apart from muslims, aren't they? But of course, they both come from the same semitic stock, so it's hardly surprising how many similarities they share with each other.]

The Black Race - Look at what has happened to whites in Africa since the end of colonial rule and look at what blacks have done in the US and the UK. Blacks blame whites for all of their many failings and the level of racist hatred blacks have directed upon whites in Britain, the US, South Africa and Zimbabwe is appalling.

Global Capitalists: Note the word GLOBAL. There is nothing wrong with Capitalism, but Global Capitalism is evil and it is causing enormous harm to the West. In this I include the huge banking corporations who thanks to their greed and incompetence have had to be bailed out by taxpayers. Politicians of all faiths and all parties betrayed their people and instead of serving their own people served the Global Capitalists instead. Not content with that they then allowed cheap foreign labour to take the jobs of British workers during a recession. Thus, each of the main political parties have sold-out their own people and along with their support for the colonisation of Britain via mass immigration, are ipso facto now at war with the British people. [But who are these mystery 'Global Capitalists' and 'huge banking corporations' ? Are they perhaps related to the Rothschilds? Do they have something to do with Goldman Sachs? Who are the most famous international bankers of all time? Jews! Obviously not all bankers and global capitalists are jews, but again who is the vanguard and core of this group? Who are the real power players within this group? Are they disproportionately jewish? Majority jewish? Either way, again all we are denouncing here is jews, with a ridiculous smokescreen thrown in-between to obfuscate the very clear and simple issue that stands before us.]

The Western Media - From Hollywood movies to Porn flicks, from commercial broadcasters like Sky to state broadcasters such as the BBC, from world respected newspapers such as The Times to the free local papers, the media is now a Multicultural propaganda machine that makes Pravda look like The Beano. [Who controls Hollywood? Who produces/directs/edits Hollywood movies, either majority or disproportionately? Who stands at the heart of the porn industry? Who owns or edits most newspaper companies, tv news stations, news magazines, etc around the world? Jews! Again perhaps not every single newspaper, tv station, magazine and hollywood movie is a jewish production, but who is the vanguard and core of this group of malefactors? Who is the driving force? Is it disproportionately jewish? Majority jewish? It doesn't matter, the point remains the same.] As they brainwash the British people with a continual stream of lies and deceptions to condition the British people into accepting their own demise, the Western Media have also declared war on their own people. Not all of the Western media is owned by Jews [ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN are all owned by jews. Fox news is the only holdout. So yes, not 'all' the western media, but who cares? 'Almost all' is sufficient to get the job done. What a useless caveat, who cares if all, most, or simply a disproportionate number of our enemies are jews? If jews are worse than average, that is more than enough of a reason to hate jews as a group, just like we would any other group that is worse than average -- like black criminals, Islamic terrorists, or Mexican drunk drivers. Why does this logic suddenly disappear and require a whole new standard of evidence to be worthy of criticism when it comes to jews?] and it certainly is not predominantly staffed by Jews, not by a long chalk. [Who cares whether the gophers and handgrip #3's are jewish or not? The people who decide the content are jews, and they're the only ones who matter. This is the kind of bullshit reconquista attempts as refutations of the facts simply staring us all in the face.]

Now I can hear the cries of Jew-hating Nationalists as though they were next to me: "Yes Recon, they all are, but the Jews are behind all of this, they control the world, they're responsible for all of it IT'S THE JOOOOZ!" [Why do they always assume we can't spell jews right? It's the Jews, not the Jooz. Furthermore, there is no need for jews to be behind it 'all', or for jews to control the world. All we need to establish is whether they have a disproportionate impact on the world over and above their numbers, whether they are an overall net negative to white interests, and thus whether jewish power is a welcome or unwelcome reality. Do jews control the entire world? The majority? Or a disproportionate amount? Either way the point remains the same. Are jews behind all of it? The majority of it? Or a disproportionate amount? Either way the point remains the same. Like usual anti-anti-semites want to challenge a ridiculous belief like jews are behind 'all' of it or control the 'whole' world, while refusing to discuss whether jews are behind a disproportionately large part of it or control a disproportionately large power hold in the world. When will they stop attacking strawmen and start addressing the real fears and concerns we anti-semites have about the jewish influence in the media, the financial sectors, among the leftist/communist circles, in American politics, etc? Is it ever a good time to confront the jews, regardless of how little they are to blame? If they are even 1% to blame, then we should criticize them at some point, right? Right?]

To which I simply respond by highlighting the worst of our enemies, the enemy who is doing more damage to Western societies and the white race than any other:

OUR OWN PEOPLE. That is, the majority of indigenous Britons who have willingly accepted guilt, self-loathing, treason, cowardice and pity as worthy virtues and who have swallowed the Multicultural vomit spoon-fed to them by the ruling elite and who simply do not have the wit or the will to defend the freedom paid for in blood that they deem to be their right. Let's look at this in more detail. [Who here doesn't have the wit or the will to resist the PC vomit he has been fed? This very author is too PC to confront the real danger to the white race, the jews, and spends his entire time attacking the symptoms of our decline instead of the cause -- the secondary infections instead of the primary infection. Every country that has ever allowed jews into their country has eventually collapsed, or thrown them back out. Every single one. Germany did not willingly accept guilt, self-loathing, treason, cowardice and pity as worthy virtues. Half of Europe marched as their allies into Stalin's bolshevik evil empire, standing up for pride, self-veneration, duty, courage and ruthlessness. Who stopped them? Who broke their will and bombed their cities to ruins? Who butchered millions of them even after the war was over in an endless orgy of revenge? Not all of 'our own people' are to blame. A good many of them in the present, a great deal of them in the past, are utterly blameless for what has now occurred. As the song goes, 'if only it hadn't snowed.']

If I Were A Rich Man

The most common smear I hear against the Jews is the charge of avarice, and it goes something like this: "The Jew is motivated by greed and money and the Jew is never satisfied. They own all the world's banks and control most of the world's money." [Is this really the most common? If so, it's certainly not what I'm interested in. My greatest objection to jews is their backing of evil political, religious, and philosophical movements that undermine and destroy anyone who adopts them. They spread poison with almost every word they speak, whether it is Christianity, Marxism, Boazian Egalitarianism, Libertinism, Homosexuality or Feminism. It's always the jews with the most outrageous, most obnoxious, and most seductively convincing lies that destroy everyone who listens, like the Sirens of the Oddyssey. Only a country free of jews and all jewish thinking can forge a healthy political environment, philosophy, and religion for itself. Sadly, this hasn't been an option for whites ever since the days of Rome -- O for a crown of unstained air! What a jubilee our children could have if they were ever freed from jewish lies forever!]

First, if anyone seriously believes that only the Jews are avaricious then they must be barking mad! ALL races containing multiple faiths are motivated by money, the desire for wealth is not limited solely to Jews and to suggest so is plain folly. There are avaricious Christians, Muslims, Sikhs, Hindus etc. [This is absurd. It's like saying there are criminals among all races. That was never the issue or the question. The question is, are jews disproportionately avaricious, money-hungry, greedy, deceitful, cheats, frauds, etc? Just like the question is whether blacks are disproportionately criminal, or muslims are disproportionately terrorists. What a false equivalence, what an obfuscation! It's always the same with this guy.] but look at the group who will most often use this smear against the Jews, those moral beacons on the left, our socialist enemies. Whilst telling all and sundry "everybody is equal" they were were busy plunging their grabbing grubby paws into the public purse lining their own pockets to pay for all manner of luxuries, not forgetting socialist politicians who were busy playing the property market with tax-payers' money.

The black race is also as avaricious as any other. [What, are you seriously saying that every single race is exactly equally avaricious? What does 'as any other' mean? Who else is the most avaricious in your viewpoint? Where do the jews score in this scale? Top? Middle? Bottom? Please tell.] The problem with blacks is that they will steal the white man's wealth - and they have just look at Rhodesia and South Africa - but won't contribute anything whatsoever to take humanity forward. Unless of course you consider gangsta rap with its lust for bling and violent sex as being an enriching contribution?

Hmm, not contributing anything of worth to humanity yet demand riches - no wonder African blacks embrace Marxism so readily, they have so much in common. Stealing the wealth created by others because they are incapable of creating anything of worth to earn it being the most obvious. [And yet this is exactly the complaint of whites against jews. Jews never create wealth, they simply steal it from others, using various tricks like usury, fraud, lawyering, political pull, insider trading, etc. You never see a jew pushing a plow or banging some iron with a hammer, it's always the same thing -- buying and selling, buying and selling, moving money around, advertising this or that, but in the end -- never making a damn thing of value. Blacks are incompetent at the whole 'produce nothing but demand great riches scheme,' whereas jews are extremely competent and effective, one of the richest groups of people on earth. Between the two, which should we be more worried about?]

Perhaps the second accusation, that the Jews control the world's money flow because they own the banks carries a little more weight. Without doubt many financial institutions are owned or controlled by Jews but the Jews no longer exercise as much control as people think. It is also prudent to realise that not all Jews are Jews just as all Christians are not Christians. [What a hopelessly deluded statement! Not all jews are jews??? What the hell does that mean? Not all cats are cats, some are actually dogs? Jews are a race, not a religion. Many jews are in fact atheists. If a Pole abandons his religion, does he cease to be Polish? Do Jews just lack any ethnicity? And yet, genotype mappings can always distinguish jews from other ethnic groups -- you might want to discuss this theory of 'not all jews are jews' with said computers. As for the rest of us, we can only stare in wide-eyed horror at the sheer stupidity of such a statement.] The Jews, just like whites, are affected by self-loathing, guilt and self-hatred and are also cursed by Marxism-Liberalism. More on this later, but do please be aware of the existence of JINO: Jews In Name Only. [Jews in name only? A jew is a jew is a jew. Whether the jew hates jews, or calls himself a martian, or converts to Islam, he will always be a jew because no one can change their own genes -- I can't stop being white, a black can't stop being black, but somehow the magical jew is a chameleon who can be any race/ethnicity they choose to be. What a marvel the Chosen people are.] They too hate their own and are going about destroying their own as well.

The biggest transfer of wealth in human history - a transfer that is ongoing - has been the transfer of US$13 trillion from the oil-thirsty West to the Middle East. [Nonsense. The biggest wealth transfer in history has been Social Security and Medicare, from young people to old people. Or the fact that most dollars are earned by men, but spent by women, would easily qualify as the largest wealth transfer in history. Or heck, all the money spent on children rather than the parents who earned the money, would easily qualify as the largest wealth transfer in history. First define your terms, before this statement can make any logical sense. How is a business transaction freely enacted by both parties a wealth transfer anyway??] It has resulted in a catastrophic resurgence of Islam - that's Islam, not misnomers such as "Radical Islam" or "Militant Islam" or "Extreme Islam" - and one country in particular is using its enormous unearned wealth to spread Islam in the West: Saudi Arabia. [Unearned wealth? Fine, but only if we admit all the money we make from our natural resources are also unearned. All of our water, farmland, fish, steel, etc that we are blessed with should also go into the unearned category and then we can see where the exact trade balance lies. Until then, this is just a rhetorical slap in the face. I don't see American, British, and Canadian businesses giving away for free the oil they dig up on our own soil, but apparently this is what we want from the middle east. Funny how that works.]

Saudi Arabia is at war with Britain - make that the West but let's keep it to Britain, after all we're British Nationalists. The Saudis are funding the building of Mosques throughout our land, they are funding the establishment of Islamic Centres in our towns and cities, they are funding legal jihad and provide the financial clout behind organisations working hard to promote Islam and silence critics and who now wield considerable political influence in British politics - e.g. Lord Ahmed who threatened to mobilise an army of 10,000 Muslims should Dutch MP Geert Wilders be afforded free speech in the House of Lords - and Islamic lobby groups and organisations such as The Muslim Council of Britain. With the oil-weapon, the Saudis can manipulate the oil-dependant West and does so frequently.

And let's not forget that Saudi Arabia committed an act of war on September 11th 2001, murdering 3000 people in an act of Islamic jihad committed predominantly by Saudis. [Since when did rogue criminals who happened to be Saudi mean the legitimate government and people of Saudi Arabia are collectively guilty for their actions? How did Saudi Arabia declare war on us because a handful of terrorists happened to come from Saudi Arabia? Under this logic, Israel declared war on the United States when their jets strafed our USS Liberty during the 1967 war. Heck, they were even the official air force of Israel, and yet we give them a free pass. But when terrorists who are not acting on the behalf of the state come from a muslim land, suddenly that means their entire country is at fault and at war with us.] It is the Saudis who are bankrolling Islamic jihad terror groups such as Muslim League Worldwide, International Islamic Relief Organisation, Islamic Association for Palestine, Al Qaeda and The Taliban, those lovely examples of Islamic tolerance and peace who not only commit the most heinous acts of barbarity against their own people, the Taliban are sending British soldiers home in coffins much to the delight of Muslims in the UK who also enjoy abusing British soldiers returning from active service over in Iraq and Afghanistan. [They're killing British because the British are over there, just like British would kill Afghans or Iraqis if Afghanistan's or Iraq's army attempted to invade the UK, overthrow the government, and put in a new one then occupy the UK for 50 years to make sure the country was 'stable.' What an absurd accusation: "We invaded their countries and then they started shooting at us, those bastards! The perfidy! The utter evil of the Islamic world is finally laid bare to the world!"]

Amazingly, Saudi Arabia is deemed an ally of Great Britain and the United States. Oh, and Saudi Arabia forbids Jews to enter their Kingdom and if you think you as a kuffar fare any better, think again. Kuffars are forbidden to enter the cities of Mecca and Medina on pain of death [Isn't that better? Jews can't enter the entire kingdom, but the rest of us can go everywhere but two cities in the country. How are the two equivalent?] and I will bet you a pound to a pinch of the proverbial that you will not find many Christian churches or Christians in that delightful country and if anyone was stupid enough to preach Christianity there and demand Saudi school-kids be fed pork and study Christianity they'd be killed in a heart-beat. [Didn't this article start with the premise that Christianity has destroyed the west, like Nietzsche warned? Why are we suddenly worried about Christianity not being allowed to be spread? Wouldn't this rightfully be seen as a self-defense technique against an already admittedly evil and poisonous creed?]

And as Christians are persecuted and driven out of almost every single nation in the Middle East, only one nation provides a safe place for Christians to practice their faith in the region. [Again, didn't we earlier establish that Christianity is pure evil? What's so bad about driving it out of the middle east? Shouldn't we drive it out of the whole world? Furthermore, how on earth do whites find themselves magically teleported to the Middle east where they can no longer worship their giant jew in the sky? Why is this such a pressing issue for the white race, that we be allowed to worship the divine jew-boy jesus, in countries we don't even live in and never will?] It's the same one Jew haters throughout the West marched against in their millions in 2009, screaming for the Jews to be sent back to the ovens or to the gas in reference to an event in Jewish history that they often claim simply didn't happen. [The two statements are not in any way contradictory. Whether the Holocaust happened or not is a factual question, not a moral or ethical question. "Jews to the gas" is a moral/ethical/political argument, concerned with the present, completely independent of what exactly happened during WWII in various concentration camps. Many of the leading scientists in the Holocaust Revisionist camp are not in the least anti-semitic or even racist. David Cole is even a jew! The factual question, and the ethical/moral questions surrounding it, can never be conflated, and should never be.]

So to those who hate the Jews let me ask this:

Are synagogues being built throughout our lands and are Jews committing acts of terror against Britons to establish Judaism as the dominant religion? [Dominant religion? No. Dominant race? That's another question. It was jews who blew up the british King David Hotel and killed plenty of British in the 1940's. Jews were quite willing to commit terrorism against Britain when it suited their purposes, and they have always honored and defended those acts, even made the perpetrators high ranking officials in their government. Will you condemn their terrorism?] Is Israel - a country facing exactly the same Islamic jihad as the West - funding Jewish terror organisations enabling them to commit murderous acts of violence against innocent people in every country where Jews co-exist alongside people of other faiths? Are your children being force-fed kosher meals in schools, [No, but God help someone who wants to buy non-kosher pickles at the supermarket!] are Jews raping your teenage girls [Well, to be fair, they are leaders of an international sex-slave ring that kidnaps or tricks teenage girls into forced prostitution for life, does that count?] and are Jews waging a legal war against anyone who dares criticise the Jewish religion? [You mean, like all the people who are currently in jail for denying the Holocaust or criticizing jews in any way? The jews are the master of speech suppression and the most oppressive thought police of all. Islam is only trying to use a tool long since put into place by jews for the sake of jews. Call it the law of unintended consequences.]

But the evil Zionist-Jew-Nazis are controlling the world, right? [Or maybe they're a disproportionately powerful group within the world, who have a net negative influence on the world? The world is not pure black and white you know, it's possible for there to be a shade of grey -- somewhere between jews control the whole world, and jews have no power whatsoever and have no influence whatsoever on the course the world has taken. Just a thought.]

More food for thought:

Of the 13,155,000 Jews in the world, 300,000 live in the UK. Of the estimated 1.3 BILLION Muslims, two million live in the UK and I can tell you that along with their 1 billion fellow Muslims they will not be controlled by Jews, "the descendants of apes and pigs" as their prophet Mohammed referred to them, no way whatsoever.

Hate Not Reason

I find it very difficult understand this rabid hatred for the Jewish people displayed by a few British Nationalists. With the left-wing red rabble I can understand it because the reds absolutely despise success because success is evidence of inequality. Since the Jews returned to their homeland of Israel from around 1870, Israel has developed into a first-world nation, the sole democracy in the Middle East and a nation that shines like a beacon when compared to the brutal and retarded Islamic garbage dumps that surround it. [What would you expect? Ashkhenazi jews have an IQ of 115 on average, arabs have an average IQ in the 80's. What kind of achievement is it to outcompete arabs at anything? The real comparison is Israel vs. Europe, Israel vs. the USA, Israel vs. Australia, or Israel vs. Japan. As it turns out, given their IQ potential, Israel has made a piss-poor show of itself and has typically shown itself incapable of crafting a viable nation anyone would want to live in. I'd rather be among whites or asians than jews any day. Envy their success? Spare me, Israel probably won't last even 50 more years.]

Yet the Jew-haters will rant and rave about Zionists as if these people are the most evil people on planet earth, indeed, they will claim the Zionists are controlling the entire world and that they are going to destroy all non Jews. I'm sure you'll have heard some unbalanced individual spewing out numerous Zionist conspiracy theories all based on suspicion and the flimsiest of evidence, e.g. that the Mossad were behind 9/11. [I never did understand the word 'zionist.' It's no more wrong to invade and occupy Israel than it is to invade and occupy the Americas or Australia. It was an underdeveloped landmass full of primitive peoples who didn't deserve it, and the Jews took it from them. Good for the jews. Now if only all of them would go to Israel and complete their conquest -- out of our hair and lives forever. Hitler was a Zionist. He helped fund and support the transfer of Jews to Israel before the war started. No one's problem is with jews in Israel who mind their own business and take care of their own lives. Our problem is with the jewish diaspora that undermines their hosts wherever they go, and stubbornly refuses to leave. Jews, not zionists, are the issue. As for the 9/11 conspiracy, the jury is still out on that. Given that jews have already performed two recent false flag attacks -- the USS liberty and the Lavon affair, it's hardly beyond their moral faculty. And given the USA has lied about several other war-starting events -- the Lusitania, Pearl Harbor, the Zimmerman Telegram, the Gulf of Tomkin, the Boston Massacre, the Kuwaiti babies in incubators, the WMD in Iraq, etc, etc, it would be no surprise if they lied to get into this War on Terror either. Only the facts can discover if this was an internal or external attack -- and these facts can only be gathered once we open up a new, complete, and thorough investigation of 9/11 that gives equal and transparent information to both sides of the issue.]

These are the same people who cannot wait to label the Israelis as "Nazis" whenever Israel has the affront to defend itself against Islamic jihad, a jihad waged by proxy by Iran and, yes,you're right, Saudi Arabia who finance and equip the fanatical Muslim jihad organisations HAMAS, Fatah and Hizballah to "drive the Jews into the sea" in full accordance with Islamic Sharia law. Funny how the Western media and the Jew-haters never mention how Sharia law is the core reason for this conflict isn't it? [Isn't the core reason for the conflict the fact that the jews invaded Palestine via mass immigration then conquered massive additional territory in a series of aggressive and expansionist wars? If the jews weren't there, ipso facto, there would be no conflict either.]

That most people in the West believe this jihad is all about the persecution of "Palestinians" and their "right of return" to their state of "Palestine" that is being "illegally occupied" by Israel shows how clueless the West is about Islam and how eager Jew-haters are to give vent to their intense anti-Jew hatred instead of understanding how this conflict is being played on the world stage to establish the global ummeh, therefore, how this conflict affects Britain.

I have written about this previously but the fact that there has never ever been a state called "Palestine" and therefore, no such people as "Palestinians" doesn't get in the way of the haters. [Before humans left Africa, there was never a state called 'Britain' and no such people as 'British' either. Does this mean a British people and a British state can never emerge in the future? Befuddling logic. The fact is, the recent history of the Palestinian people has shaped them into a distinct ethnic group and territory, they exist now, so it hardly matters whether they ever existed in the past. If Kosovo and East Timor deserve their independence, why doesn't Palestine?]

Nor does the fact that the Saudis and their puppet Yasser Arafat used the threat of Islamic terror to force Europe to not only fund with taxpayers' money the "Palestinian Cause" but also to increase Muslim immigration into Europe and the Europeans cowered and they still cower.

So Israel defends itself against an Islamic jihad being funded by the US, Europe, Saudi Arabia and Iran and is labelled as "Nazi Jews" for doing so.

But what's been happening while the Jew haters have been chewing their comfort blankets [Huh? Isn't this a little much?] and blaming the Jews, is that Muslims around the world are committing the same heinous acts the Jew haters lyingly accuse Israel and the Jews of. And those who worship a prophet who was a paedophile and a murderer of Jews hate the Jews more than anybody else does and you know what? They hate you the dirty kuffar even more [That's impossible by definition, they can't hate the jews more than anyone else, and hate us even more. . .], and it doesn't matter if you hate Jews or not.

First comes Saturday then comes Sunday, first the Jews then the Christians. Then the Buddhists, the Hindus, the Sikhs the Zoroastrians, the atheists, the Liberals, the Multiculturalists - ALL KUFFARS until all of the world belongs to Islam. And all of the groups mentioned in this paragraph are being enriched by the "religion of peace" as you read this essay. [Yes, assuming muslims were any threat to the white race, their announced goal to conquer the world would be frightening. But honestly, who's afraid of a bunch of retarded desert nomads who are stuck in the dark ages? The real threat is the race that has 115 IQ, far smarter than our own -- not the one with 80 IQ we could wipe out whenever we pleased. Who is stopping us from resisting Islam? Who is preaching love of the stranger, arguing for mass immigration, campaigning for pacifism and surrender? Remove the jewish poison in our midst, remove the jews and all their jewish thinking, from Christianity to Communism, and Islam would never be a threat to us. Nor would anyone or anything else. The source of all threats and our only vulnerability is jews, and jewish thinking -- get rid of that, and everything, everything else is cleaned up with them.]

This conflict in the Middle East begs a question:

If the Jews are trying to control the world why is it they can't even control Israel? [Maybe their best method of control is from the shadows, not direct government? Just a thought.] They've already given up the Sinai, they've given up Gaza, they pulled out of Southern Lebanon, they've allowed Arab refugees - not Palestinians - to flourish in Judea and Samaria (The West Bank as the Muslims and their allies want you to believe) and they've also given them a third of Jerusalem. This in addition to the loss of Jordan, half of the land of Israel which was originally promised to the Jews. And in Israel, these Arab refugees enjoy more rights and freedoms than they would be afforded in ANY Islamic country.

For all of this, the Israelis and the Jews have earned the hatred of the world and the murderous terror attacks of HAMAS, Fatah and Hizballah. If Israel and the West had any sense at all, they would kick-out every single Muslim back to the Islamic cesspits where their beasts spawned them and where they and their retarded, brutal evil death cult truly belong. And if they dared attack any other nation then they face the severe consequences.

But we can't have that can we? Oh no, instead, whites join in the Jew hate-fest whilst pandering and cowering before an evil enemy who not only imposes Islam on the West, it gets the myopic, gullible, Liberal-Multicultural fools to pay for their own destruction. These the same simple-minded hate-filled useful idiots who scream "Kill the Jews!" as their own society is destroyed by Muslims before their very eyes. [Is it wrong to fight AIDS when we're continuously infected with Tuberculosis? Or are we only allowed to ever fight tuberculosis and never, ever address the root cause?]

So blinded are they by their hatred and stupidity they cannot see it. They cannot see the thousands of Buddhists slaughtered in Thailand. The millions of Hindus slaughtered in India - who also lost a large part of its land to Muslims. They cannot see the extermination of the Zoroastrians and Bahias in Iran. They cannot see the Jews murdered by suicide bombers in Israel or Jewish children cowering in fear from rocket attacks deliberately launched at them as they are on their way to school but they're Jews so who cares and besides, those "poor oppressed Palestinians" are only firing piddling little fireworks right? Nor can they see the thousands of Christians executed and mutilated in Iraq, Pakistan, Indonesia, Turkey, Egypt, Nigeria, Somalia, The Sudan. [Are they white Christians? If they aren't white Christians, why the hell should we care?]

Of course they can't because IT'S THE JOOZ innit?

Please. Instead of hating the Jews, let's wake up to the very real nightmare of Islamic jihad before it's too late. [How are we going to wake up when Jews still control the media and still preach nothing but love and tolerance and political correctness from dawn to dusk? Isn't this putting the cart before the horse?]

Lessons From History

One aspect surrounding Jew-hatred involves a quite nauseating and frankly misguided admiration of Adolf Hitler and Nazi Germany. I have read on various Nationalist blogs comments about Adolf Hitler being some kind of champion for the white race. This is the same Adolf Hitler whose insanity [What credible historian thinks Hitler was insane?] caused the deaths of millions of whites right after millions of whites had been slaughtered on the killing fields of France and Belgium just 20 years previous. [Wasn't it France and Britain who declared war on Germany? Who exactly caused the deaths of all those millions? We're the ones who firebombed Dresden.]

But many of the people making these comments do not seem to understand that Hitler was not about "White supremacy" but Aryan supremacy. He held all other races - including Anglo-Saxons, Celts and Picts [Bullshit, Hitler had a deep admiration for Britain and never wanted to go to war with the UK. He never once categorized the British people as inferior.]- as biologically inferior to the Nordic Aryan [You idiot, anglo-saxons ARE nordic aryans] and would've had no trouble at all in exterminating inferior non-Aryan races [Considering he had no such plans or statements to that effect, this is quite a stretch, don't you think?]- who many of these Hitler admirers belong to - but why let facts spoil a good "sieg heil" from these misguided, wannabee Nazis.

There are also the questions surrounding the Holocaust, those who deny it ever took place and those who like to have a pissing contest [Huh? So it doesn't matter whether 1 million or 6 million died due to an unplanned accident or a planned brutal homicidal campaign intent on genocide? That's just a pissing contest?] about what the real numbers of victims actually were. But whose history is being denied here - is it solely the Jewish history? [Not at all, I also deny the soviet history that claimed Katyn was done by the Nazis. The Soviets lied about that, just like they lied about the Holocaust, just like they lied and pretended they were victims of WWII when they had already drawn up attack plans on Germany and were marshaling their forces for an attack into Europe themselves before Hitler's preemptive strike got a leg up on them.]

Most definitely not because it also denies British, American, Canadian, Polish and Russian histories because it was their soldiers who liberated the death camps [Only Russians ever liberated 'death camps.' Every camp freed in the west was a concentration camp with absolutely no gassings. All Holocaust scholars agree there were no gas chambers or gassings in any of the camps liberated by non-Russians.] and who the deniers accuse as "liars". [I only really need to accuse the Russians of lying, something the Soviet Union constantly did throughout its history.] Are we seriously to believe that after almost a year of heavy and intense fighting the allies and the Russians decided to embark on such a grand deception? And how convenient of them all to agree, along with the support of the International Red Cross [What are you talking about? The Red Cross reported over and over again the concentration camps were humane and the nazis weren't conducting a genocidal campaign against the jews], the International media [you mean the jewish dominated media?], the citizens imprisoned in the camps [you mean jews?] and of course, the Nazis and the German people [you mean the Germans tortured into confessions before being hanged?], including those who committed the atrocities and those who witnessed them along with those white Germans who were victims of their own master race.

Isn't it a tad odd that only this aspect of WWII is denied? There is no denial of British WWII history: Dunkirk, The Blitz, Arnhem, D-Day, or the dreadful abuse endured by allied POWs in Japanese camps. [Yes, because all of these things are well documented, with video evidence, actual corpses, and so on. All we have for the Holocaust is eye witness testimony that claims all the corpses of this awful atrocity were turned to ash and dumped into a river, all the documents detailing the massacre were burned or written in code, etc. We have zero physical evidence of the Holocaust, we have all the evidence we need of every other event during WWII. Why shouldn't we doubt people who only offer their own 'word' as proof of such a heinous and unfeasible claim?] Only the "Jewish" holocaust - Jewish history - is denied. And along with denying the "Jewish Holocaust", the history of other victims is denied too. Ignored by these Jew haters are the 4 million other victims of the Nazis: Gypsies, Slavs, the mentally and physically handicapped, the political dissenters, Christians, members of the white race including women just take the camp at Ravensbrueck, where Jewish prisoners were the minority, as being one notorious example from the 55,000 concentration camps established by the Nazis throughout Europe. Kind of all those European nations to play an active part in creating this "Jewish Myth". [No one denies concentration camps -- America also had concentration camps. The question is whether the jews were gassed in genocide death camps or not. That is the unique evil of the Holocaust, everything else is completely unimportant.]

That number doesn't include the death camp at Jasenovac, run by the Croatian Ustashe, the beloved allies of the Nazis. I wonder if this is denied too? If so, we can add the Serbs to our growing list of liars and deceivers.

What is telling for me about the Holocaust is that those who perpetrated it didn't deny it, indeed, many were defiant about it to the end, monsters such as Irme Grese and Adolf Eichmann. [Eichmann? Who confessed to ridiculous things after being tortured at the hands of Israelis? Give me a break.] The trial of Klaus Barbie in France in the late 1980's also re-enforced this because the prosecution didn't deny that he'd committed war crimes but that those who aided him were still at large in the very government that was prosecuting him.

One thing I will agree on with the Jew haters is that the Jews have hijacked the holocaust and depicted it as solely an atrocity committed against Jews when it most certainly was not and stating so does not diminish from what the Jews suffered but by hijacking it they diminish the suffering of other races and peoples and I condemn them without reservation for it. [Gee. thanks. Could you also condemn them for pretending the Holocaust was the worst slaughter in history, even though Stalin, Mao, Japan, Ghengis Khan, Islam's Jihads and the Aztecs all did far worse? Could you condemn them for shoving the Holocaust down white children's throats who never did these crimes, aren't even related to anyone who did these crimes, and yet are taught from age five up to feel guilty for them?]

Another accusation thrown at those who defend the Jews is one of re-writing history, an accusation I find somewhat amusing. If the Jews have been such a threat throughout British history and they damaged Great Britain so badly, well how did Great Britain manage to build the greatest Empire the world has ever seen? [You do realize that British people also rose up and massacred the jews in Britain throughout British history, and that British monarchs seized jewish property and even expelled all jews from England for centuries? Perhaps the British Empire didn't tolerate jewish malfeasance back then as much as they do now.]

Yet these are the people who vote for the British National Party because they want to make Britain great again! I'm really glad they feel this way, I do too but I wish they'd drop this glaring contradiction. The British Empire was so mighty because it was built largely on Judeo-Christian foundations [No, it was mighty because it was built on anglo-saxon foundations, combined with the Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution. Those two filthy religions were never of any use to Britain at all.] and let's remember that the systems of commerce that brought trade all around the Empire and contributed to Britain's wealth were developed in the main by Jews. [Hello? Adam Smith?]

Blame Game

When discussing the current dire situation the West is now in, the blame for the situation is always laid at the door of the Jews. When it comes to Marxism, Jew haters will claim Marx was a Jew but fail to mention that his family had converted to Lutheran Christianity. [That's because Jew is a race, not a religion.] But Marx isn't the only figure to have influenced the left, the philosophy of Antonio Gramsci, founding member of the Italian Communist Party is also greatly admired by the leftards and he was not a Jew.

Jew haters conveniently blame the Jews for the current situation the West is in and will claim Multiculturalism for example, has been imposed upon the West by the ruling Jewish elite who want to destroy the West. I reject this absolutely. Jews are not responsible for the nightmare of Multiculturalism and to single out one race for blame is ridiculous. Are some Jews involved in enforcing Multiculturalism? Of course. But there are also blacks, Asians, Orientals, Arabs and of course whites including leading Christians who are all involved in inflicting this unnatural and destructive social experiment upon the British people. [But who is at the vanguard? Who is disproportionately represented? Who forms the hardened core of the enemy? Who has the intelligence to actually be dangerous?]

But the elite who are imposing Multiculturalism in Great Britain have only been able to do so because the majority of the British people have chosen to accept it. In addition to the malicious - the Marxists and the Socialists - there have been the naive Liberals who went along with it because they truly believe in the fantasy of a rainbow utopia, a Shangria-La where the lion lies down with the lamb, where all of the races live side-by-side in peace and tranquillity. All races that is except the Jews because they'd only spoil it no doubt.

I'm sure Jew-haters will now say something like: "Yes, but these naive fools have been betrayed and lied to, they trusted those who brainwashed them and those doing the brainwashing are the Jews."

To which I say: Ignorance is not an excuse for stupidity and it isn't just the Jews who are doing the brainwashing, other races have noticed the suicidal stupidity of the West and are busy exploiting it.

This last point is absolutely crucial to this essay and is something every British Nationalist I believe needs to have a very clear awareness of. Blaming the Jews is nothing more than an excuse, it is an opt-out, a get-out-of-jail card that absolves our own people from the responsibility of the mess THEY have created. Throughout these essays I have tried to explain how the white race is behaving in ways that fly in the face of nature by WILLINGLY accepting the Multicultural ideology, indeed many British people - and of the white race as a whole - are amongst the most vehement defenders of this destructive and unnatural ideology.

Let me make it clear: The Jews didn't force Britons to gorge themselves on porn, to sink themselves into ever-increasing debt, to consume with insatiable greed the cheap foreign goods that flooded Britain. The Jews didn't force Britons to watch their Hollywood movies, to read Jewish and Marxist-Liberal propaganda through their media and the Jews didn't force anybody to vote for corrupt, devious, treacherous and avaricious politicians - politicians who come from a variety of backgrounds - native Brits, Catholics, Protestants, atheists, blacks, Muslims and Jews. The Jews didn't vote them in and what these traitors have done to their own people wasn't solely conducted by Jews and it has caused Britain far more harm than any other race has, including the Jews. [Force or fraud, it's the same either way. Jews lie, people die.]

Clear evidence of this was provided in a timely manner by the good people of Norwich in the recent by-election. In a year where the economy has collapsed, where taxpayers bailed out the banks, where slave ships returned to British ports and where the sickening greed of politicians from the lib/lab/con one party con-trick was exposed for all to see - ironically, in the Jew-controlled media - these rational and intelligent Britons did what they have always done and voted for these incompetent, greedy, self-serving, duplicitous thieves in their thousands. The Jews didn't put a gun to their heads to make them vote this way, they voted willingly and in full knowledge of what the politicians had done to them. [After fifty years of being conditioned that racism and anti-semitism were the worst crimes on earth, who exactly is left to vote for their own rational self-interest? Who hasn't been brainwashed to self-destruct via the education system, holocaust literature, social ostracism, peer pressure and the lying media to vote the wrong way? Voters can't help voting the wrong way when they are fed lies and threats from the day they're born to never, ever vote BNP. It takes people with great wit and great will to oppose such forces, usually at great cost to their own personal lives. It's a miracle anyone votes BNP, expecting everyone to do so is just ridiculous.]

In the last essay, I discussed Einstein's definition of insanity and applied it to the behaviour of the white race. And Norwich provided the perfect example of people doing the same things over and over again and expecting different results. It is absolute insanity, no question about it.

The Jews are infected with this suicidal madness too, Jews like George Soros and the anti-Israel "Jewish" lobby group J-Street who continue to make demands on tiny Israel to give up its land to the Arabs in return for a non-existent peace. In so doing, these juicidal Jews are aiding the current global Islamic jihad and they are far more useful to the enemy than any other Jew.

Diverting Attention

Blaming the Jews doesn't just detract from the root cause of the problem - the suicidal stupidity of the majority of the white race [And yet we can't help being stupid. Intelligence is genetic and we are stuck with a 100 IQ average, 15 points behind jews who can therefore lie and lie and lie and we'll never catch on. I've endorsed eugenics to get rid of our suicidal stupidity. How about you? In the meantime, what do you propose to do about it? Continue getting taken advantage of by high IQ lying jews for another couple centuries and hope we somehow survive to see the eugenics program bear fruit?]- it also diverts attention greatly from the responsibility other races bear for the grave damage they have maliciously inflicted upon Great Britain. Races such as the African and the Afro-Caribbean black, parasites who have invaded our nation, sponged off our welfare system, introduced their retarded culture including gang culture with its drug abuse and tribal violence. Then there are blacks who've made careers out of being black, blaming the white race for all of the many failings of blacks and screaming "WAYCISS" at anyone who disagrees with them, demanding more and more "positive discrimination" to handicap the native Briton so the black invader prospers - at the expense of the now weakened indigenous Briton.

Blacks never accept responsibility for their failures, they always blame another race, another tribe, another person for their own short-comings and I reject this absolutely. Blaming the Jews is exactly the same as blacks blaming the whites and throughout the West, [It's not exactly the same, for the precise reason that we are telling the truth, but they are lying. Suppose a girl claimed her life had been devastated by the continuous sexual molestation her step-father had done to her as a kid, but it turned out to be completely false and he was innocent. Now another girl says the exact same thing, but this time we have dna evidence, video tapes, and it's absolutely certain she's telling the truth. Is her accusation the exact same? Is she on the same level as the girl who lied and has no excuse for her emotional problems? Or is she allowed to protest abuse and injustice and ask for help against the pain that has been inflicted on her? Apparently not, according to Reconquista.] blacks are using the hate-crime of racism to colonise us whilst deceitfully blaming whites for the mess Africa is in.

Yet back in the lands of Africa, the whites have been almost ethnically cleansed from Zimbabwe, the Boers are facing an ongoing genocide and whites in South Africa are facing an escalating violent and anti-white racist crime-wave. All in addition to the appalling horrors blacks inflict on their own people. The behaviour of blacks has nothing to do with the Jews, blacks and blacks alone are responsible and nothing should distract from that uncomfortable truth.

Along with many other parasitical races who see Great Britain and the British people as a life-support system, who invade our land, grab as much as they can and give little if anything in return, these white-hating invaders present a much more serious threat than the Jews and we shouldn't allow ourselves to be distracted from that. [Jewish parasitism is much more insidious because it doesn't just stop at your money. It seeps into your very brains and makes you want to serve jews -- witness the evangelical christians who would do anything for God's chosen people and Israel -- or this very author who would do anything to excuse jews for the many sins they've committed against our people. A nation can survive its fools and even its ambitious, but it can never survive treason from within.]

Conclusion

Blaming the Jews for the plight of the white race will only render British Nationalists powerless. [That may be true, that's certainly why Nick Griffen gave up talking about the jews, even though he knows the score. Nick Griffen denied the Holocaust and hung out with David Duke/Don Black in the past, but now he sings the merry old tune that Jews are the best thing since sliced bread. This is obviously just a tactical maneuver, but you seem so stupid that you actually believe in it. I don't believe any political party will ever succeed that doesn't tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. But in any event, we should agree to at least not tell lies. A healthy blanket of silence, a complete refusal to comment one way or the other, is infinitely preferable to lying and groveling at the feet of our jewish handlers. Have some self-respect, at least enough dignity to say nothing at all. Don't attack us on the right with the courage and sacrifice that dared to oppose the most powerful people on Earth, for your sake, not our own.] The Jews are not responsible for this situation, whites are. The sooner we accept this, the sooner we accept that we are responsible for what has happened and therefore we accept that we and we alone are responsible for getting ourselves out of it. Blame is an excuse and an admittance of inferiority and there is no way I will ever admit that I as a white man - a proud white Briton - will ever admit anyone from any other race is superior to my own and that includes the Jews. [I'll readily admit a group is superior to me, if they are superior to my group. It's only objectively fair. However, jews are only superior at lying, at ruthlessness, at cheating, and other such traits. Their intelligence is largely used for one purpose -- how to lie, cheat, and poison everyone around them. I hardly want to be superior to Jews in this field, and therefore I quite readily cede the entire field to them. Who wants to be the best evil doers on earth? They can have it. The white race is the greatest race on earth, when it comes to things that matter. Our love of truth, our love of love, and our love of beauty is absolutely unparalleled. Our contributions to all three fields are absolutely unmatched. Just read Human Accomplishment if you have any doubts. Blacks can run faster all they want, and Jews can lie better all they want, I'm content with what I have, the most moral race on earth.]

What I resent the most when I read Jew-hating comments on BNP supporting blogs is the damage that they do to the efforts of all the BNP supporters and activists who are working tirelessly and determinedly to try and save our country and our people from being destroyed. All of their good work can be scuppered in a moment, all undermined by this crass and self-destructive hatred of a people who do not present anywhere near the level of threat to Britain as either Islam or mass immigration or the EU. Yes I know some comments are left by the red retards who will do anything to damage the cause of British Nationalism but still Jew-hating nationalists remain. This Jew hatred turns people off from the more important message that the BNP are trying to promote: That Britain is for the British people, that the British people have a right to their identity and their nation and the world has to accept this.

Those who do not are our enemies no matter what race, creed or colour they are and that includes those who have placed our people in great peril: The white race themselves.


*************************************************************************************

Racism is pretty well established, but anti-semitism is still hotly debated. I don't think anyone needs another article proving blacks are stupid, Islam is evil, or Mexicans are drug dealers. The only topic that still seems up in the air, among all the racist circles of the world, is the precise role and place of Jews in all this. Because jews are intelligent and gain most of their money through legal, though not moral, means, whites are continuously deluded into thinking they are a benign or positive enrichment in our lives. Nothing could be further from the truth. The same horrible catastrophe that struck Weimar Germany, Soviet Russia, Rome and Egypt will strike us down too. It's only a matter of time. We can fight AIDS or TB, the primary infection or endless secondary infections, the root cause, or the symptoms. One way, we at least have a chance at victory. The other way, we are doomed to die. How hard a choice can this be?