Why a White Homeland?

Whenever I propose a White Homeland as the cure to all our ills, I'm afraid it sounds rather shallow.

There are plenty of white countries around the world, some are still up to 97% white -- and yet none of them are well off. Arguably, America is freer, richer, and healthier than they are -- and this at just a 60% white population. Why would simply increasing the percentage of whites in our country make us better off?

The answer, of course, is it wouldn't. The % of whites in your country is a necessary, but not a sufficient element for a utopia.

An all white nation would be a nice refreshing change from the bizarre aliens and strangers who surround us today, but truth to say, even a 90% white nation, with a good culture, is far better than a 100% white nation with a bad culture. The main benefit to an all white nation is being around people like yourself -- people who share your sense of aesthetics, people who share your values and morality, people who share your history and genealogy. It's good to be affirmed and loved for who you are, rather than rejected and despised. Now, this implies some sort of relativistic values system where it doesn't matter what we believe, only that we all agree on it. That's not what I mean. The race-soul of a people calls out for a belief system perfect for itself -- our genes cry out for a self-expression, a culture, that embodies our nature, that fulfills our natural wants. In the end, there is an ideal world for everyone, and that ideal world is much closer in nature between related genes than unrelated genes. Therefore, an artificial consensus simply imposed on people through brainwashing, peer pressure or government force doesn't please anyone. Nor can a natural consensus be derived from disparate elements. We are born Republican and Democrat, Religious and Atheist, and so on. (Don't take my word for it, read Rushton's Race, Evolution, and Behavior, that discovers our personality and beliefs are also influenced by heredity ie genes.)

Basically, when you see a group of people in disagreement, the best answer will almost always be to separate. Convincing people against their own instincts and feelings is not a long-term solution, nor is forcing them to ape the behavior we see as natural and good. Someone will always end up unhappy. Even in marriage, the best predictor that the marriage will be a happy one is how similar they are -- in education levels, wealth, looks, beliefs, and so on. An equally valid measure is to simply ask how genetically related they are, since all the previous things are hereditable. The closer people are related, the more likely they are to get along. Families are closer than normal because of how similar the people in the family are to each other -- not because of some magical bonding process that works just as well for step-children or adopted children. That's the gene-denialists position, that family love is an artificial construct and can be mimicked by unrelated people equally well. Standing in the face of this are the cold facts, like rates of child abuse twenty times as high when the father isn't related to the kids, or the fact that two adopted children make different sorts of friends and gravitate to different social circles, based on their different innate genes, even if they themselves have learned to get along. Most shocking, in twin adoption studies, twins separated by adoption at birth are more similar in personality and beliefs, than the same twins to their adoptive parents.

A nation will also feel 'closer,' more loving, more affirming and supportive to its people if they are more closely related. A nation should be a breeding ground for a certain type of soul, one that feels at home in that nation, who wouldn't have it any other way. What happened in every white country on Earth, however, whether it's 50% white or 97% white, is the same curse: It's been irredeemably judaized. An alien culture has supplanted the natural race-soul and the national 'home' of whites. Its values, aesthetics, looks, and beliefs have all been imposed by people outside of them. An alien culture has invaded and conquered everyone equally, whether the aliens actually live there or not. So all white homelands are equally badly off, because they've all uncritically accepted the same judaic nonsense as the USA. Christianity? Judaic nonsense. Multiculturalism? Judaic nonsense. Hollywood? Judaic nonsense. Materialism? Judaic nonsense. Tolerance? Judaic nonsense.

Take for example classical art versus modern art. Classical art is the expression of the European race soul, what Europeans when left to themselves decide to draw and sculpt and look at. Then jews came from somewhere or other, established themselves as the professors of art and art critics and controlled the newspapers that extolled all jewish aesthetics while denouncing all European aesthetics. Soon enough, Europeans had lost control of their own art and their tastes were being browbeaten into them by the authority figures at the top. The woeful herd nature of most humans, and their woefully low IQ in comparison to the Jewish invaders, made it hopeless to resist this sudden revolution. A revolution in taste that has sat sourly on our tongues ever since -- that we cannot quite express or explain, but makes us unhappy every day it lasts. The same with switching out the European styles of music with the jewish record labels that now control the music industry. Or the classical and gothic architecture with the jewish modern architecture, which always looks terrible -- but we have lost the ability to express what our architecture should look like, or why exactly we dislike how buildings are today. It's the same for our literature -- a Canon chosen by jews is quite different from the Canon chosen by Europeans. Our Founding Fathers, for instance, were reading Greek and Latin classics -- while our education consists of reading various PC tales about how wrong it is to discriminate. Recently the jews even had the chutzpah to make all high schoolers read "Riding the Bus with my Sister," where we learn all about the life of a retarded jewess ((Literally, I'm not kidding.), and presumably learn to feel oh so much sympathy and love for her. When jews write our canon and jews choose our canon, we will begin to hate reading and literature in general, it will make us unhappy to even be in school. The expressions of our European race soul, Dostoeveskey, Dickens, or Gibbon, rot in some corner while two bit hacks like To Kill a Mockingbird are read day in and day out.

A White Homeland would be distinct from a country which just happens to be white. The enormous, humongous, stupendous difference, would be that for the first time, we take control of our culture and design it to be by and for White people. We will scientifically zero in on what appeals, aesthetically, to white people. What is good WHITE art, as it were, what suits us most naturally, what makes our inner hearts sing. And then we will give it to our people. There will be a light step in our citizens, a sort of un-placeable happiness, where people can't even define why they have such nice days. But it will be everywhere, the expression of their race soul, the expression of the very best inside them, elevating and extolling them -- the buildings, the books, the music wafting on the wind, the store windows, the clothes we wear, can you imagine how many little things, how many little influences there are? The gilding on our silverware, the designs on our sheets -- there is room for art everywhere -- and each time there is a chance for it to be art that appeals to whites, that appeals to whites' whiteness, or art that appeals to jews, and forces whites to act and think like jews. (Or blacks, hispanics, asians, etc, if they were in power.)

It's not just our chance to recapture our art forms however. Just as vitally, we can teach history from a white perspective. We can create a white nobility, people who are exceptional at 'being white,' who have in spades the virtues we value in a person. Not money, not cunning, not anything jewish. If you want to look at a European virtue system, look back to Plato -- Courage, Justice, Wisdom, and Temperance. A nobility such as that, who could object to their rule? Where in modern society do our elected officials ever possess anything remotely similar to these virtues? It's easy enough to identify the seeds of these virtues on the playground, and it would be easy enough to continue promoting the kids who keep passing our tests, to enter that nobility. A true class of shepherds, who earn their rank every generation, rather than predators whose cunning, greed, and criminality are legend. Politicians are among the least trusted or respected classes -- why should it have to be that way? Because our race-soul was polluted and the culture that worked for thousands of years -- the ideals of the nobility and the aristocracy, were overturned by the jewish-communist belief in universal democracy. Even when the US Republic was founded, only around 1/4 of the people could vote in it. The same was true of England and other countries well into the 1900's. But the general creep of democratic-communism (where power is distributed equally regardless of merit) was definitely pushed by non-whites, who did not represent the instincts of the white race-soul.

It's obvious that there were faults in hereditary rule, and these faults were honestly addressed by people like Machiavelli, Montesquieu, and others. Sadly, these same people honestly critiqued democracy and held moderate positions on what we could do about the faults found in monarchies. When we return from the blight of democracy to the clean and pure air of the nobility, we can leave the faults of the past behind. Children inheriting power they did not merit, tyrants abusing their subjects, parasites collecting rent but not actually administering justice or defending the realm. Things like this are abuses of the system, they are not innate to it -- there were plenty of reigns by Good Kings and Good Emperors, golden ages of mankind. The art of choosing leaders who will always deliver like a Hadrian is simply a matter of scientific testing and training, it's impossible to believe that out of a pool of millions of candidates, no one is suited to the position or can succeed at it.

We can devote our money to the causes of the white race-soul. Particularly, our faustian curiosity and love of Truth. Rather than feeding Africa or converting people to Jesus worship, our charity can be to science projects. Like super-colliders, telescopes, fusion power, space travel, self-driven cars, stem cells, genetic engineering -- anything that catches our fancy. Again, the difference between a White Homeland, and a country full of whites, is for the first time ever, we can actually devote ourselves to ourselves. Not to outsiders, not to outside ideologies, but to our inner cores. It was whites who invented the scientific method -- we invented it, not anyone else -- and it's because science is what we're suited for. It's what we Should be doing. If there isn't a revolutionary science project being cooked up, if there isn't an enormous goal we are shooting for, our society grows pensive, lax, and weak. Whether it's the interstate highway system, landing on the moon within the decade, or sequencing the Human Genome, whites are at their best when the nation is pooled together chasing an exciting dream.

It took one year to build the Empire State Building. One year. Whites can do great things, when they're inspired to do great things, simply because they are great.

The so called 'Freedom Tower,' still doesn't have a single story or inch of scaffolding up. It's been 8 years. It's pathetic. This is what happens when the wind is taken out of our sails, when we aren't inspired to do anything but feed Africans or embrace immigrants. We never get anything DONE. We as a people are no longer DOING anything. The most aimless generation ever.

A White Homeland would be our first chance, as we are founding a new nation, to install an entirely new set of values and norms. A country full of whites, through sheer momentum, is stuck in a rut, a rut of accepted laws and customs, that it's impossible to break out of. For instance, the idea that women should have the right to choose who they marry, or even whether they marry at all. For the longest time, this was not a part of white culture -- it came from elsewhere. I honestly don't know where it came from. What I do know, is that the result is a societal wasteland headed for extinction. But it cannot be stopped, the momentum is simply too fierce. Women will not give up their right to hedonism and careerism, in countries where those rights have been long established, and children are raised expecting to have them as the norm. White women in the past were raised with the knowledge that they were meant to marry, have, and rear children. Since so many children died, they would commonly have to bear 10 children just to end up with two. It was hard work, it was a lifelong task. And these marriages were arranged by their parents -- women were generally asked for consent, but they weren't expected to go courting themselves, or to be the ones choosing their mates. They accepted these 'harsh' and 'slave-like' laws because that was just the way it was. It wasn't questioned or challenged, so they had no idea that they should question or challenge it. They had no idea they were living as 'sex-slaves.' For them, they were living a life of honor and virtue, they were making their family proud, and they were obeying God.

Based on people's perspectives, the same conditions can be terrible or gratifying and fulfilling. If we recast marriage as a duty and a privilege, if married women with children are the highest status women can have, they will accept it just as cheerfully as their predecessors did. But if we stay in the same old country, some 97% white country of today, all of its culture and institutions will make such a demand impossible. Women simply aren't geared to think like this anymore. I expect the whole sorry tale will play itself out to the very end, the spiraling death of the West, in all these 'countries full of whites,' because women will never give up their current privileged state -- and democracy will never be able to vote them out of said privileged state. It will take a new nation, a clean break, with clearly different priorities, to start at a healthier point. It isn't the number of whites that makes a white homeland, but how pro-white the nation is. A white homeland is a homeland designed to be pro-white, a homeland that is designed for whites to prosper and thrive in.

In a White Homeland, the environment can be protected up to OUR standards, not littered on and overcrowded and defiled by swarms of Indian, Chinese, Hispanic, or African slums. Whites love their mountains and moors, their forests and their rivers. We have a right to enjoy them the way God intended us to enjoy them. We have a right to wide open spaces. We have a right to a small population occupying a vast open countryside. Why? Because we are so productive with the land we use, that a country of a thousand whites is better than ten million blacks crammed cheek by jowl in the same space. Furthermore, after all we've given humanity -- from the car to the computer to the steam engine to Michelangelo to the very green revolution that allowed them to multiply their population endlessly -- we can claim any amount of land we please and we'd have earned it and more. We have a right to the land, we have a right to be the only ones on said land, and we have a right to have as many or as few children as we please on said land. To reach an equilibrium that suits US, our race-soul. Not thirty people to an apartment, not people sleeping in shifts on the same bed, not working hours for nickels because our jobs are always at risk by the hungry unemployed outside our doors who'd work for pennies.

Since countries full of whites have no immigration control, they can not protect their environment, their economy, their workers or their rights. A White Homeland would be different -- even if it had a smaller percentage of whites! By having the self assertiveness, by having white pride, by being pro-white, it would keep the country white, at the population we like, forever. Not for a couple more generations before the shoe drops -- not until we die of old age -- forever.

There isn't a single aspect of life, that couldn't be made better by designing the laws, the system, to better suit our natures. In a universalist country that intends to be 'fair' or 'balanced' towards all parties, of course the system can't be designed to benefit anyone. It would have to appeal equally to completely different people with completely different wants and needs. The more variety we input into a country, the more strained a government is to serve all its citizens equally. Eventually it becomes impossible and the state descends into civil war, but in the meantime, everyone equally is miserable. Muslims feel the country isn't suited enough to muslims, jews don't feel it is suited to jews, blacks don't feel it's suited to blacks, hispanics don't feel it's suited to hispanics, Asians don't feel it's suited to Asians, Indians don't feel it's suited to Indians, and Whites don't feel it's suited to Whites. And guess what? It isn't! It isn't suited to anyone! In a dreadful chimera such as the United States, with the heads of goats, lions, and snakes all mixed together into a single flame and poison belching body, there is no way even a single group can possibly be satisfied by the laws, looks, and feel of the whole. We can do much better than this. In every field in life, suiting it to our particular, not our universal nature, will always make it fit and feel better -- just like tailored suits! Countries full of whites, are still designed from a universal viewpoint. A White Homeland, is designed from a particularist viewpoint -- what is good for whites? What is the deepest expression of the European race-soul? The country that lives as the embodiment and answer to that question will be our utopia.

Could Atlas Shrugged Work Today?

Speaking of Ayn Rand, what of the Atlas Shrugged model of revolution? Is it more or less feasible than the Harold Covington model? More or less feasible than the Turner Diaries?

The essential premise of Atlas Shrugged is that without a small group of elites working night and day to advance and uphold modern civilization, it would all very quickly devolve back into the Dark Ages. The infrastructure would decay right alongside the philosophy, the technology would reverse right alongside people's virtue. Simply by stepping aside for a brief moment, elites could make their point to the astonished masses about how necessary they were, who would then beg for the elites to come back and set things right on the elite's terms. After this brief strike of the elites, civilization would return and the people would forevermore be grateful towards their betters.

This is hopelessly optimistic thinking. There are a million holes I can poke into this theory, but the first one that comes to mind is that Mexico is not currently in the Dark Ages. China went full blown communist, and yet it did not enter the dark ages. Heck, even Nigeria isn't in the dark ages anymore. The fact is, even in a horribly run society, infrastructure and technology can be maintained indefinitely. Cuba may be putting around in 1950's cars, but it is in fact still driving cars around. A torturous existence, worse than nothing, a net negative life, can be maintained indefinitely, sometimes it falls (like the USSR), but sometimes it doesn't. What if the elites went on strike, and people just struggled through it, soldiered on, and lived in wretched but stable conditions forever?

The next question is why would the elites ever rebel? They're the ones rolling in wealth, status, and power. It makes no sense for elites to have any qualms with present day society. Sure, in Atlas Shrugged, communism made it impossible for the elites to get ahead, but today's model is not communism, it's a plutocracy. People with money make the campaign donations that elect the politicians of their choosing. Said politicians turn around and give cushy favors and taxpayer dollars to the rich businessmen who supported them. Rinse, cycle, repeat. Elites, the money aristocracy, have no reason to bite the hand that feeds them. Today in America, the top 1% have a larger share of America's wealth than anytime in the last century at least. They are getting more powerful, richer, not weaker or poorer. It is the same for Mexico or any other tin-pot dictatorship. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer -- the poor never rule in any of these places. Though communism might be inherently unstable, plutocracies are extremely stable. The powerful are already in power, and they use their power to ensure they will stay in power. It's not that difficult a concept to maintain.

Plus, the elites of Atlas Shrugged thought too highly of themselves. There are more than enough smart people to fill all leadership roles in business, art, science, and government. Just look at the resumes of some of these high schoolers being rejected by Harvard. Perfect SAT's, 4.0 GPA's, tons of extra-curricular awards and olympiads, straight 5's on their AP tests. There is a vast, untapped sea of talent that our job market simply can't or won't support. Many of these people end up janitors or clerks because there is simply nothing society will pay them to do. If a thousand 'elites' whisked away one day to a secluded village in Colorado, ten million equally qualified elites, or barely less qualified elites, would be scrambling to get into those jobs, and would fulfill them just as well as the previous holders, or close enough to just as well, that nobody could tell the difference. There are more people with law degrees than can get law jobs, more people with engineering degrees than can get engineering jobs, and more people with science degrees than can get research grants. As technology improves, this situation will only get worse. Imagine some genius invents an easier coding language that makes it ten times as fast and simple to make a new computer program. What will happen to all the computer science majors who made a living writing code? You guessed it, nine in ten will be fired. In a world of massive unemployment, it's impossible for a strike to succeed. The same innovations in farming that reduced farm workers from 90% of the population to 1%, the same innovations in manufacturing that replaced blue collar workers with automated machines, will sooner or later replace high-end thinking jobs as well. Machines will be better at proscribing diseases based on people's symptoms than doctors, for instance (because their memory can be enormous and it never fails)-- they will also be better at performing the surgery. (Machines' hands don't shake and they don't get tired.)

The truth is, a human being is lucky to get a job, any job, in the world of today. Far from people needing our work, mental or physical, all essential jobs were filled eons ago, and most of what people do is worthless make-work. Vanity jobs that achieve nothing but our own self-esteem. For instance, anyone who makes less than 10 dollars an hour may as well not even work -- their work is so worthless it obviously shouldn't be done in the first place. Anyone receiving their money from the government is equally worthless work -- if the private market found no use for the job, then the job has no use period. For the last twenty or so years, however, these are the only two areas where job growth occurred -- shit jobs and endlessly inflated bureaucracies. In France it's something like for the last FIFTY years there hasn't been a single new job made in the private sector. After all, how much work is there really left to do in a society full of computers and machines?

The Industrial Revolution figured out how a single person working with a machine could make a thousand times as much cloth/needles/etc than the economy could the day before. Suppose people really wanted 20 times as many clothes as they currently had -- that would still require 49/50 of all textile workers to be laid off. The steam engine meant all manual labor became worthless, and a single liter of oil can generate as much work as 2400 hours of manual labor (or some ridiculous number like that, the point is the same regardless.) Farm labor, mining labor, all labor is now redundant.

But setting this aside, let's assume that all the elites at once went on strike, and they did this out of an idealistic urge to see the triumph of truth and justice, and no amount of money, wealth, or status could divert them from this sacred cause. The revolution would still fail. Why? I present to you South Africa!

In South Africa, blacks have managed to destroy their infrastructure, become the most violent country on Earth, infect around 1/4 of the population with the lethal AIDS virus, and in general dive directly back into the Dark Ages. Have they repented of their mistakes? Have they asked for whites, the elites, to take back over and set it all straight again? Have they learned the error of their ways? Has suffering made them realize that their betters really do deserve power? Of course not. Because hatred and envy are far more powerful emotions than self-interest or greed. Blacks would rather die than admit they were wrong. They would rather starve to death or die of AIDS than see a white person back in power. They would rather anarchy prevail than white men impose law and order. The whole dream that people will 'come to their senses' if you just let them suffer a while is again, hopeless naivety. As though communists were ever interested in material well being. As though communists' one goal hasn't always been to tear down their betters and destroy, out of pure envy, anything they themselves could not create. Communists, South Africa, is now better off than before. According to the human heart, it is better to be the King of Hell, than the servant of Heaven. King of a Dunghill, over lapdog of a Palace.

The real ending of Atlas Shrugged should have been something like this, "John Galt makes his speech, the government tells him to piss off, everything wrong about today is due to the legacy of capitalism, and everything will be perfect soon enough, the people agree and vote in yet another communist democratically for the next election, ad naseum." Do you really think people are reasonable? That people are intelligent? Only one in a thousand people are as intelligent John Galt's target audience. Only one in a thousand people even have sufficient grasp of the English language, sufficient capacity for logic, to even understand what he is saying. Even if they all agreed with him, it wouldn't change a thing. The envy and hatred of the remaining 999/1,000ths would simply tear us all limb from limb.

A revolt by the elites, for the elites, is a non-starter. It cannot happen.

Look at all the successful revolutions in the past 300 years! The Russian Revolution, done in the name of the poor -- Peace, Land, Bread. The French Revolution, done in the name of the poor -- Liberty, Equality, Fraternity. The American Revolution, done in the name of the middle class -- Life, Liberty, and Property. The Cuban revolution, Che Guevera and all that crap. Mao's revolution with his little red book, declaring peasants to be the true proletariat. And the National Socialist revolution, that proclaimed: Ein Reich, Ein Volk, Ein Fuhrer! Has there ever been a libertarian revolution in history? No. Has any successful revolution tried to appeal to the rich? No. Has every successful revolution been populist? Yes. Should we also bear a populist revolutionary message? YES! Who could have ever imagined a mass movement based on the one in a thousand intellectual and his right to amass wealth into an ever-more-concentrated singularity? The right for J.P. Morgan to own the world. Oh, sure! Let's all rally behind this! I can hear the pitchforks gathering now!

Whether we succeed or fail, it is clear what our slogan must be, the only slogan that has the tiniest sliver of a chance at success, something as simple and populist and broad and appealing and welcoming as the slogans that came before:

We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children.

A revolution that anyone with a clean soul can accept and be a part of. A community that looks down on no one, cuts through all class divides, and tells someone they can have a purpose, a place, in our community however humble they might be. That all they are required do to be our equal, all they are required to do to be our comrade, our brothers -- is fight for the homeland. The white homeland our children can run and play in without fear. The white homeland with white picket fences and blonde flowing hair and white wedding dresses and peaceful white doves and pure white rainbows floating in the sky! This is it! This is the place you belong! This is where you can truly be someone! This is the future you were indispensable for making come true! This is the grave we will always, always, gather by, remember and honor -- every year a memorial to the independence you won will sing and surge through the line of your descendants for a thousand generations. God bless such a life! God bless such a death! God bless such a cause!

Now, a slightly different question might be asked: If Atlas Shrugged can't possibly be a blueprint for our revolution, could it still be our blueprint for living before the revolution? For instance, would it be wise to stop working, so that our tax dollars no longer support this Zionist Occupied Goverment? Would it be wise to stop marrying, until the marriage laws of old are returned and adultery and divorce banned? Would it be wise to stop voting, because democracy is a sham and doesn't deserve an ounce of legitimacy? Would it be wise to stop listening to the Television, because you know everything it says will always and only, ever be lies? Would it be wise to refuse to have children, because their fate outside our Homeland is a fate worse than death, and we should never bring another child onto the earth until we finally have a safe place to raise them again? Would it be wise to stop volunteering for the army, because this nation no longer deserves to be defended? Would it be wise to stop giving to charity, because no one has spared us any charity in ages? Would it be wise to stop attending church, since all they ever preach is poison?

This question is nettlesome. Yes, by completely withdrawing from the outside world, by completely withholding your services from the world, you help to weaken its foundations. At the same time, you weaken us even more. If we don't have children, who will teach racism to the next generation? If we don't make money, who will fund our revolution? If we don't join the army, who will know how to fight? If we don't live and act like winners, who will be convinced we are? So there are arguments for both sides. I still think the best thing to do in this inverted, insane world, is become rich, marry, and have lots of kids. We don't know when, or if, the revolution will ever get off the ground. It may not occur during our lifetime. In which case, we will have to lead normal everyday lives, our entire lives. The thought is disgusting, it's traumatic, but there it is. Someone has to carry the torch onwards to the next generation. For anyone in a position to do so, what can I say? Duty is heavier than a mountain, death is as light as a feather.

Tyranny:

According to Ayn Rand's masterpiece, We the Living, the three choices a human being has in the face of tyranny are 1) Kill yourself, 2) Kill your mind, 3) or Leave.

America is in the grip of a tyranny just as bad as communism, in fact worse than Soviet Russia. Soviet Russia, despite grinding its people down as much as it could, never imagined importing a new race of people into the country in order to genocide the native inhabitants. That was an innovation of the West. America took the lead in waging war against its own people through complete and total race-replacement immigration. America is in fact the worst government in human history, the most evil government to have ever lived. Even though China killed 35 million Chinese, they never imagined killing off all Chinese, or replacing Chinese with negroes after the slaughter was done. America, however, has taken an entire continent of whites and thrown it to the wolves. Not only the 200 million or so whites currently living in America, but all the whites who will never be born on our once mighty continent -- larger than Europe and thus holding the greatest potential as the cradle of the white race -- have been murdered forever. It is a crime of unspeakable magnitude, a tyranny beyond any bearing.

This insane behavior has been papered over by a paper-thin excuse, that all people are interchangeable parts, that it doesn't matter who exists and who doesn't, that white people have no reason to live anyway -- and that therefore killing off all whites and replacing them all with browns is not, in fact, a crime. This paper thin excuse does not work -- if people truly believed we were all interchangeable parts, you would not see the segregation of the races that everyone personally chooses in their private lives. The friends they make, the church they attend, the neighborhood they live in, the race they marry, all of it innately rebels against the theory that everyone is the same and interchangeable. Race matters. It matters to everyone. The race around whom we live is one of the most pivotal factors for human happiness possible.

What we are seeing then is not that the excuse is working, all people immediately see through it and declare it false in their own lives. Instead, the excuse is more subtle. People imagine that even though they happen to be racist, that the mythical person 'out there,' 'somewhere,' leads a completely multicultural, multiracial existence, just like the excuse says we should. These people, constantly portrayed in the media and tv shows and movies as absolutely loving diversity and always having a black 'best friend,' and a black 'boyfriend/girlfriend,' must be the majority. So each white individual assumes he is in the minority, and that even though the system does not work for him, it must work grandly for everyone else, or else why would the media have so many shows about it? This placates him, in essence, the white person 'takes one for the team.' The very collectivist loyalty that proves the theory of multiculturalism a lie, allows him to suffer for the greater good of all his white contemporaries who apparently all love diversity and can't have enough of it.

Next, the paper thin excuse is enforced in the same way Communism was enforced in Russia -- you never know when you are being spied on, who will betray you, who is the informer in your circle of friends -- you never know when it is safe to tell the truth. The fact is, everyone is a racist. We are born racist, we are born preferring our race, we are even born hating and fearing people of other races. We are attracted to people like ourselves and hate people who aren't like us. This evolved naturally because anyone who didn't feel these emotions, had no incentive to further their collective gene pool, and lost in competition with those who were enthusiastic pushers of their own collective gene pool. Evolution has so hard wired racism into everyone's brains, that this IN ITSELF proves racism is necessary for survival. That everyone who isn't racist, has already long gone extinct. It also proves that anyone who isn't racist today, is also destined for extinction. It is as suicidal to ignore this natural urge, as it is to stop breathing, eating, or reproducing, in some demented belief that we should 'rise above our instincts' and 'be better than our animal selves.'

So when people gather in a group and denounce racism, it isn't because a single person there believes it. It's because all of them are terrified of being singled out as the racist in the group and attacked by their peers. Their peers, likewise, are terrified when a friend or family member announces they are racist, for fear of guilt by association. They will then denounce in the loudest and most scathing tones their former friend or family member, in order to escape the tar brush of being implicated alongside their erstwhile intimate with the same crime. If you don't join in the attack on your peers, you will join in being attacked by your peers. Therefore we have a foolproof system, where everyone is actually racist, and yet no one can either be a racist or tolerate a racist in their midst.

How has racism become such a terrifying charge? Well, sometime around the 1950's, racism was blamed for slavery, the Holocaust, murder, war, poverty, and every other activity humans find repellent. If racists were responsible for everything that had ever gone wrong in human history, no one wanted to be a racist. There was even a on-the-surface good argument for this theory: The people who took slaves, genocided jews, murdered blacks in lynch mobs, invaded other people's lands, denied people jobs or services, so on and so forth -- WERE ALL RACISTS. This is proof positive that racism is the root of all evil, is it not? But of course it isn't, because they could just have easily said the people who did all those things all believed in breathing, or eating, and that therefore breathers and eaters are the root of all evil. By creating a false correlation between racism and evil (all good acts as well as evil acts were also done by racists), people decided that racism must be the ultimate evil and racists the darkest force in the universe. Just like the Soviets blamed everything on reactionaries and kulaks, today we are told that everything would be perfect if not for all the racists in our midst. Of course, since racism is as natural as breathing and eating, and since racism can only end when a group of people loses all wish to survive and dies just as soon as anti-breathers or anti-eaters would die, there will always be racists to blame for people's woes. Just like self-interest is as natural as breathing or eating, and self-interest will only end when a group loses all survival value and dies, and thus there will always be 'reactionaries' and 'kulaks' available for the Soviet Union to blame.

This game of first identifying a trait that everyone is born with, then blaming this trait for all evil that has ever happened, while ignoring the obvious good it must do for it to have evolved in humans in the first place, then attacking people for possessing this trait, is a tool of tyranny. There could be no better process for a tyranny to keep power than to make people feel guilty for possessing a trait they cannot help but have.

The truth is racism is not only the source of war, genocide, crime, oppression, and all that jazz. Racism is also the source of love, community, altruism, security, prosperity, meaning, identity, purpose, and pride. Racism is an absolute necessity in life and anyone who lacks it suffers and dies within a geological eyeblink. Scientific studies have already verified that people who take pride in their race are happier than those who do not. History has already shown what happens to any country that abandons its own people to foreigners (slavery and death). Putnam has already proven in his book 'Bowling Alone' what happens to the community life in the face of diversity. The very biology of the human being, our love for those related to us and fear of those unrelated to us, has the genetic stamp of approval of God almighty, our creator, evolution, that put it there for a reason. By piling all the sins of racism at racism's feet, while completely denying any of its benefits -- by ignoring the fact that racism like any other instinct can be abused -- that obesity does not mean eating is wrong, nor does hyperventilating prove breathing is wrong -- it has been possible to completely distort the argument to the point that racism is inexcusable and absolutely evil.

How do people deal with the fact that they discover themselves to be completely racist in all their decisions, while also believing that racism is absolutely evil? There is a lot of Orwellian doublethink. People pretend they are avoiding a 'culture,' or a 'bad environment,' when in fact all they are ever avoiding is non-whites. Then there are people who don't make any excuses for themselves, and feel miserable and guilty every day of their lives, self-flagellating themselves in private and public over how racist they are and how they cannot exorcise this inner demon. Then there are the people who manage to find one person they can relate to outside of their race, and thus pride themselves with clearly not being racist, while living in a white neighborhood, going to a white church, married to a white, with 9 out of 10 white friends, and so on. The schemes are various and multitudinous, but it all boils down to living a lie.

Living a lie is humiliating, it breaks the human spirit, it's degenerate. The results are swift and terrible. People who lived a lie in communist Russia fell to drinking, drug use, and the clearest of all symptoms of spiritual despair -- refusing to reproduce. Russia therefore has a third world standard of living among a first world people. They have been destroyed, annihilated, by living a lie, by living under the tyranny of a lie, by being made to feel guilty for who they are, by being forced to rebel against nature and reality, which made us the way we are for a reason. Now look at America and Europe -- alcohol and drugs used to be legal in our countries, there was even heroine available for consumption by all and sundry -- and yet not many people abused it. There were around 100,000 drug addicts in the entire United States when drugs were banned in the 1920's-1940's, less than 1% of the population. Now drugs, which we vigorously persecute and control with millions of law enforcement agents, are being used routinely by around 40% of the population. Alcohol used to be served to kids regularly and drunk every day by the peasants and nobility alike. They never had a problem with alcoholics like we do today, even with all our attempts to control alcohol consumption and keep it away from kids. The bars and New Year's Day celebrations of Russia and Britain today were never imagined by the rudest peasants of Russia or Britain of the 1800's.

Russia and the West have experienced convergent evolution. Even though different environmental factors were being applied to them, both peoples have adapted in the same way. The response to tyranny is always the same -- kill yourself, kill your mind, or leave. The response to feeling guilty, to living a lie, to being humiliated and ashamed, is always the same -- kill yourself, kill your mind, or leave. Both Russia and Europe has had a great exodus of people escaping to the far corners of the Earth. But there is another way to 'leave,' and that is not have children. If children are not born, they will effectively 'leave' this society, as will you, in time. People who can't bring themselves to commit suicide, can silently make sure they will not live in any sense of the word in the future, that no part of them will still exist to be oppressed and abused in the future. The birth rate of a people is a clear sign of their happiness, their spiritual health. When people feel confident and happy with themselves, they go on to have large families, like the baby boom after WWII. When they feel insecure and depressed, they have small families or none at all. This is where we stand today, and for the last 30 years this is where the West has stood. It is the greatest die off in our history. Worse than the black plague. Both Russia and Europe are killing their minds, they are rife with alcohol and drugs. Both Russia and Europe are killing themselves, suicide is much higher in modern life than it ever was in the 1800's or earlier, when people ostensibly had much lower living standards than today. It is spiritual health, mental health, not physical health, that determines suicide rates. Our technology has made us prosper materially, but nothing has nurtured our souls for a long time. The results should have been obvious as to what would happen if we rejected Nature and reality in favor of lies and tyranny, they are now clear from the simple facts of life all around us -- we are living in Hell and most of the West has already given up rather than live in it any longer.

Another way for people to 'leave' a tyrannical world, is to simply retreat into a tiny hole where the outside world can no longer touch them. Monasticism, secular style. These people feel completely alienated from the world, want nothing to do with it, and are in pain whenever they do have to interact with it. To divert their minds, they watch TV, play video games, read books, who knows what. Anything that doesn't involve the outside world is fine by them. These are the NEET's (Not in Education, Employment or Training.) and there are millions of them. People love to blame the victims, the NEET's themselves, for the phenomena of their existence, just as people love to blame suicides, alcoholics, and drug users for their choices, and yet it's obvious that it cannot be the individuals to blame. If the phenomena were all due to the failings and weakness of individuals, then the rates shouldn't change over the centuries, the same amount of people should have these failings and weaknesses every generation -- unless you can provide some sort of biological explanation for how one generation can be completely genetically unique, across the board, from all the generations that came before them who lacked these weaknesses. The alternative explanation, that society, the environment, has so drastically changed, that people who would have lived ordinary healthy lives in the past, are now driven to become NEET's, druggies, alcoholics, childless couples, or suicides, is the only explanation for this sudden upsurge in self-destruction.

Racism cannot possibly be to blame for societal self-immolation, as racism is always directed outwards against others, not inwards against one's own. In fact, it is the very lack of racism that is to blame for all of this. Racism is a society's immune system. It protects us against selfish individuals (cancer cells) from within, and from foreign invaders (viruses) from without. Just as there can be auto-immune disorders, racism can sometimes over leap its bounds and cause more harm than good -- look at the petty ethnic interests that sparked World War I and World War II for instance. But a total collapse of the immune system is not the solution to auto-immune disorders. Allowing selfish people to run roughshod over everyone around them, because 'individuals are all that matters,' allowing foreigners to invade, conquer, and despoil your lands 'because we are all equal,' is just as destructive as racism gone amok.

For fifty years now we have all been told to not be racist, that racism (and sexism, and anti-semitism, etc) is the source of all evil. For this reason, not a single inch of racism (or sexism, or anti-semitism, etc) has caused any of the problems of the modern era. Racism (or sexism, or anti-semitism, etc) cannot possibly be to blame for any of the hellish circumstances we find ourselves in today. And as it turns out, the world is now MUCH, MUCH more evil than it ever was before. This is not just a subjective statement of preference, it is objectively born out by the statistics of people's self-destroyed lives. Never have people been more depressed, more unhealthy, more self-destructive than today -- not once in history have birth rates depopulated a land more thoroughly than the black plague. It's a simple matter of cause and effect: First we banished racism, sexism, anti-semitism, homophobia, etc from the public sphere. Then we became the unhappiest people on earth and proceeded to kill ourselves off at a pace faster than the Black Death. Only a return to racism, sexism, and anti-semitism can possibly save us, because only by banishing these attitudes did we get here in the first place. C.S. Lewis once explained, that sometimes when people find they are lost and have strayed off the path, the only possible solution is to retrace their steps, go backwards until they have returned to where they started, and only then can they proceed forward again. In other words, progress is often simply returning to where we came from, when mistakes are made, there is nothing better than undoing the mistake.

When we got rid of racism, sexism, and anti-semitism, we doomed ourselves to today. A day where women have destroyed the family, children are no longer raised correctly, couples can no longer have meaningful and lasting relationships, and life can no longer be brought into the world. Where jews have destroyed our souls, by vilifying our history, replacing our uplifting epics with their degenerate lies in Hollywood and the media, and making us worship in their temples of holocaustianity, judeo-christianity and political correctness. Where other races steal the bread from our tables, the land from our ancestors, the birthright of our children, the language we speak, the government we ran, and even the wombs of our women, leaving us with nothing and nowhere for ourselves and our own. There is a direct link between all the problems society faces today, and the last fifty years we have lived in denial about the facts of life and the wisdom of our ancestors. (Who, UNIVERSALLY, were all racist, sexist, anti-semites, who I can quote ENDLESSLY from proving all of these points.) For anyone who wants a 'return to the good old days,' but refuses to return to the attitudes and philosophies and ideals that created the good old days, you are either cowards or hypocrites. A bunch of rotten fools who demand the benefits of something without ever undertaking its costs, its responsibilities, its actual creation.

It's clear as day that racism would not allow foreigners to waltz into our country, vote themselves welfare and take our jobs while raping our women.

It's clear as day sexism would not allow divorce, adultery, single motherhood or slut-spinsters who make a mockery of love.

It's clear as day that anti-semitism would not allow bank bailouts, media lies, filthy movies, or foreign wars for Israel.

All the ills of today would have been laughed away in scorn or slapped down with an iron fist of disdain a hundred years ago. No one would have stood for this shit, not for a single instant. When you take away all sanity and reason, every ability to protect ourselves and our society, what once was laughably simple and laughably easy to solve, is now an insurmountable dilemma threatening to drive us all to extinction. What a border guard or quiet talk could have solved yesterday, now requires an all out war today. This can't go on. What can't go on, won't go on. Either we continue our descent until every last person in the West has 1) killed themselves, 2) killed their mind, or 3) leaves, or we reverse our descent and return to the healthy society that once conquered the world and now can conquer the stars.

The Power of Imagery:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/32387123/ns/health-behavior/

Read all about it. It turns out that if people are shown a fictional movie, and read a true account of the same subject, they will 50% of the time, one week later, when asked what truly happened, respond with the movie's version of events.

Alternatively, if the movie is the same as the text's true account, they will 50% more accurate in their recollections of the truth.

Basically a massive portion of the populace cannot be reached through the written word and is solely manipulable through tv and movie images.

Who controls Hollywood?


http://www.latimes.com/news/columnists/la-oe-stein19-2008dec19,0,3844853.column

Well, here's a jew writing in the mainstream press the same answer we are 'radical', 'conspiracy theorists,' or 'nuts' when we say the same.

Jews control hollywood. If Jews control hollywood and the TV stations (which of course they do), this means they have the power to manipulate 50% of the population to such a point that even when they are given the truth to read, they will prefer the fantasy fiction on the screen.

Is this really an entertainment device? Or is it a weapon held at our jugular? If jews can make half the population believe anything jews want them to believe, in a democracy, this gives them total power over the country. Where do you think all these ridiculous lies come from? This is why jews cannot be allowed near a camera or a microphone, they broadcast poison and they use it to gain power over the rest of us. Whether jews live inside our country, or outside of it, their influence will be the same, if we allow a single one of their movies or TV shows to be shown. Basically, TV and movies are not the harmless 'fiction' that mature responsible adults can enjoy without psychological brainwashing. For the majority of the population, it is a weapon that enslaves them for life into a world of lies. They cannot distinguish between truth and fiction. If they see it happen, it must be true. That's as far as their lowly IQ ever goes. Then these brainwashed zombies turn around and vote for the jewish hand-picked candidates, because of what the movies and TV shows taught them was true and good. This drags the rest of us down with them, whether we were fooled or not. Commonly these zombie masses will exert peer pressure on us to conform to the movie-reality they have been sucked into, or they will divorce us, disown us, fire us from our jobs, and so on.

It's no good to be living in a population of 1/10 manipulators, 1/2 zombies, and 2/5 honest free men. The zombies are doomed due to their own weakness, so we can ignore them if we please. But what about the honest free men who just want to live in the clean air of truth and not be bullied by the losers around them? What about the 2/5 of the population which wants neither to manipulate, nor be manipulated? Do we just have to stand here and watch armies, legions of zombies be produced in hollywood factories to be ranged against us in their battles, peer pressure, economic pressure, elections, etc? If we do, we will be dragged down with them.

This is the curse of anyone who knows the truth, knows what is right, but will not act. He will be dragged down with everyone else. Despite what is inside his head, he will act like everyone else around him, and the consequences of society's acts will affect him just as much as anyone else. It is useless to be free of lies personally, the entire country must be purged of lies, brainwashing, and manipulation, or else you may as well be just as deceived as the next guy. And that means in this case, jews and all jewish thinking from the beginning of time to today must be purged from the country. That is, unless studies show that the inhabitants of said country are responsible enough, mature enough to watch lies for entertainment value, or for the edifying purpose of recognizing lies when they see them, and are no longer misled and controlled. We can hope through self-selection that our homeland would have less fools like the ones reported in the article, and that through eugenics we would soon overtake the IQ of our jewish overlords and thus see through all their trickery -- but at least to start with, what we need is an independent media making our own music, movies, television, religion and myths.

We need our children watching life-affirming values that inspire and reinforce their racial instincts. It could be as simple as showing the earlier Disney films, before jews took the company over -- Sleeping Beauty, Cinderalla. It could be showing Lord of the Rings and Star Wars. Braveheart, The Patriot, Gladiator. Stories where men are still men and they fight for something larger than themselves. For a free people, we need an extremely controlled media. It sounds paradoxical, and yet it is crucial. If lies are more believable than truth to the common eye, we can't pollute people's minds with even the most innocent of fictions. We become the guardians of Truth, by ruthlessly censoring any lie that might pass through the screen's pixels before it reaches our populace and changes their attitudes and behavior forever.

Humans were never adapted to look at seemingly real-life events, and assume they were false. This power came from technology just 100 years ago. For a couple million years, people assumed that if they saw it with their own eyes, it must be true. It will take a long time for our minds to catch up, evolutionarily, to the world we face today. Until then, we must treat the technology of motion pictures as carefully as the nuclear bomb. It's simply too dangerous in private hands.

Whenever I say jews control America, or jews control the world, people say that's impossible, there's too few of them, blah blah. And yet, when I point out that the entire world watches Hollywood movies, and that 50% of people when given a true account of what happens, still believe the movie they saw was the true version of events, and that therefore 50% of the world believes anything jews tell them -- they can't see how that yields jews control of the world? When I point out that 50% of the world's religions (by population) are based originally on the Torah, that giant stack of lies we call the Old Testament and the center piece of all jewish thinking, they imagine jews don't in the least control or influence them!

The fact is, you don't need political control over someone, if you have already lied them into supporting you through modern media or ancient scripture. The easily misled, the zombies, are completely tied up in the Jews' corner. And the free men, the ones that can't be fooled, are dragged down with the zombies due to the disparity in numbers. This amounts to total world power. How can it not? The study is right there. It speaks for itself. People have a right to know the truth and live according to its precepts. Whether they are stupid and gullible, or being dragged down by the stupid and gullible, it is still wrong to force them down the wrong path. If jews don't get that, if they insist on inserting lies into all of their news coverage, movies, music, magazines, and tv shows, then people have a right to live without jews and free of all jewish thinking from ever crossing their country's borders. What else can we do? Must we simply bow our heads and be their slaves forever? Must we be their cattle and lick their feet forever, as Israel's Prime Minister wished of us? I'm sorry, but I want better in life than that. I want white children all around the world, to have a better life than that. Whether it inconveniences jews or not.

Carrots and Sticks

How will we recruit the revolutionary vanguard needed to secure a white homeland? Obviously if we already had one, we could simply revolt. Since we don't have one, we must first convince people to become one. What's in it for them? We must show that their lives and their children's lives would be better off in a white homeland, than the USA. We must also provide a feasible plan proving the revolution would succeed if they try. I think the plan offered is feasible. I don't have exact knowledge or need exact knowledge on how the revolution could seize military hardware or nuclear weapons and point them outwards, while securing every street corner with a man with a gun. People better qualified than me, once they JOIN the revolution, can do this planning for us. But looking at it from 'above,' it just makes sense to me. In the end the only enemy America can throw at us is young white men of fighting age. No one else is worth a dime or has any military significance. If we corner the young white men with the guts to fight market, the war is won. It's won by default, whatever our plan is.

This doesn't mean women, children, and old people have no reason to live in a white homeland. They have every reason to do so. It just means that they aren't the people we have to convince. The people we have to convince are the ones who will be doing the killing and dying. Whoever else wants in is welcome, but the white men are going to be necessary.

So, what's in it for a white revolutionary? Why should he bother? What's wrong with America? Length of life is around 78, per capita GDP is 46,000 a year, crime isn't all that high in the suburbs, fancy new toys like iphones and computers are coming out every year, so what's the big deal? To say something like I did, that there is no future for white children outside a white homeland, that the men will be galley slaves and the women harem slaves, what on Earth am I smoking?

Like frogs who are being cooked slowly, whites have lost the perspective to notice the genocide being conducted against them. The genocide is insidious because it is slow and silent. If anyone imagines that in 100 years, these same rosy stats will be true of white Americans as they are today, they are absolutely deluded.

Where do I begin? How about with this. Since 1973, wages for the working class have not risen, even though worker productivity has doubled. Every extra dime you made was simply transferred to the wealthy -- you didn't see a dime out of your own effort and sacrifice for the last 40 years. The minimum wage has not kept up with inflation, you are getting poorer, not richer, as America ages.

Many of the people reading this, hopefully most of the people reading this, were not alive in 1973. They have never in their lives seen a pay raise, even though, and I stress, worker productivity has doubled. Do you think you will ever see a pay raise? Any pay raise that matches inflation, for the rest of your lives?

How do you imagine this pay raise will come about? You are competing with women, who have doubled the size of the workforce. You are competing with offshore workers, all 7 billion of the world's population. For jobs that have to be within our borders, you are competing with every last Jose and Marguerite, who can cross our border unopposed and take any job they like. Even though unemployment is now up to around 20 million in America, millions of immigrants, legal and illegal, are still being allowed in every year to compete for the remaining jobs.

The iron law of economics is supply and demand. If the supply of labor increases faster than the demand, the price of labor must go down to reach an equilibrium. That's your labor, bucko. Your labor will never be worth anything, because they have made damn sure your labor isn't worth anything. It will never improve -- in fact, it will get worse every year. I can simply PROMISE this. Demographics doesn't lie.

In 1950, a less productive economy, far less efficient and without any aid from computers, a man could get a job and support a family of 5. He could keep his same job his whole life, afford a house, a car, the white picket fence, the whole shebang. Then he could retire with a pension plan from his company, social security benefits, and plenty of kids willing to help out around the house. His wife wouldn't have to work a day in her life.

Now you tell me who is richer. 1950's America, or 2009? Sure, the stock market says we're richer. Sure, we have some new gizmos and toys. Sure, the houses are bigger (not that anyone lives in said houses, since our families are small to non-existent.) But are we really richer? Two people work, no job security, can't afford any kids, or anyone to raise the kids, social security is going bankrupt and won't help any of us, and the family is up in its ears in debt, and their nice big home is probably being foreclosed on. Traffic is heavier and we have to commute for hours just to get to and from work, adding yet more work for less pay. Do you get it yet, you poor deluded fools? They've stolen it from us. The American Dream is gone. And all that stock market money, that monopoly money they throw around in the quadrillions, is just a punch of baloney. The real facts on the ground do not reflect this wealth. Debt is not money, it's just playing pretend. Speculation isn't money, it's just playing pretend. Inflation isn't money, it's just playing pretend. Paper isn't money, it's just playing pretend. Real wealth is measured by real quality of life. In the past, a single man working normal hours could afford to support his entire family without going into debt and could retire in security, he wouldn't lose his job before then either.

That is wealth. Numbers are pure imagination, they reflect nothing but the con games of the rich, who use endless arrays of numbers to move money around, produce nothing, and somehow skim their wealth off the top of the frothy mess. Even supposing America was much richer today, who cares? Who cares if only 1% of the people ever see any of these riches? Are we really happy because George Soros is a billionaire? What's in it for us? Where's our golden ticket? I'll tell you what, it's never coming. You'll never get out of debt, you'll never get that coveted raise or promotion, because the law of supply and demand is non-negotiable. Look around you, a million new immigrants every year come to take YOUR job. You think this is a recipe for riches? Yes, for the top 1%. For everyone else? Get ready to man your galley, slave.

If it wasn't bad enough being slaves to our corporations, the government is moving in to take what's left of our freedom and labor for itself. The government has decided to put America 72 trillion dollars into debt, a debt we the workers will have to somehow repay. How? God knows how. Nobody knows how. They just assume, magically, that it will work itself out when the day arrives. In a geriocracy where the old outnumber the young, it will be impossible for us, the workers, to ever cut social security, medicare, prescription drug benefits, or any of the curses they have loaded down on us via their pernicious votes. These chains will take out our pay in terms of FICA, payroll taxes, income taxes, until we bring home barely nothing -- which we'll then spend on student loans or mortgage loans or car loans all at 30% interest, and all stuff we never should have had to go into debt for in the first place, in a properly run society. Every rent payment you make is just that much theft -- first they make housing outrageously expensive with outrageous interest payments, then they charge you for not buying an impossible to afford house. When people's take home pay is around 10,000 a year, it's awfully hard to buy a 500,000 2 bedroom 2 bath house.

They've got you right where they want you, paying for nothing, and whatever property taxes the locals levy for their 'schools' (ie minority daycare centers, since whites no longer can afford children, teacher welfare payments, since white kids never learn anything at school, government brainwashing centers, since whites can't be trusted to raise their own kids) is passed directly down to your rent. There is no tax on the rich. Just as the corporate income tax simply adds to the price of our goods or cuts worker pay, property tax is simply charged to the people renting, and sales tax is simply transferred to the purchaser. Disproportionately, the poor have to pay the liquor and cigarette taxes too, because first the rich grind you down with shit jobs and shit respect, then when you try and cope with that by escapism, they nail you again with super high excise taxes. THE GAME NEVER ENDS. The fleecing never stops.

Whites didn't used to need giant houses (where no one lives because we no longer have children.) They didn't need long commutes either. This is the hidden cost of our 'diversity.' The high crime of non-whites leaves whites with two options. They can sit in the center of a third world hellhole, where living standards are as low as Africa, until they are raped or murdered. Many people are forced to do this, and listen to the gunshots and police sirens drone on every day and every night non-stop. Or you can buy a super-expensive home, way far away, where the bad guys can't reach you. And by playing this arms race of home bidding, hopefully you can always stay one step ahead of the minority criminal, one neighborhood ahead, one block ahead of the gunfire. This won't work forever, the federal government has already caught on and given 'section 8' housing subsidies alongside their HUD housing subsidies, so that wherever whites flee, no matter how much they pay, the infinite wealth of the government can plop a few enriching somalis or nigerians into the house next door -- and the gun shots and drug pushing will resume as normal.

Even if it did work, people are going massively into debt to buy something they don't want -- an expensive house -- because we are not allowed to buy the one thing we really want -- security. A safe place for our wife and kids to live and grow up in without anyone hurting them. You cannot buy that, nearly at any price, in today's America. And as the criminals stream in by the millions, the murderous and gang banging hispanics and blacks and arabs and everyone else on earth -- security will decrease every year from here to eternity. Outside a white homeland, no matter how big your empty house with no people living in it, you will never be safe. Your family will never be safe. You will never know when the cell phone call is your crying daughter. South African whites have giant houses too -- surrounded by blacks, it's all meaningless. They are being hunted down one by one. There isn't a single family that hasn't been attacked, or doesn't know someone who has.

What is your money worth if it can't buy a safe place to live? America is taxing you heavier than any government has a right to tax anyone, but it can't grant you the most basic role of the state -- security. It's quite willing to spend 400 billion a year on 'defense' (IE, invading and attacking random nations around the world), but it won't spend a single penny in YOUR defense. So what's the point? America has ceased fulfilling any of its responsibilities as a government, it ceased doing this long ago -- why should any of us support it? When is the last time our government has been on our side?

There is something just as vital being neglected here. If men cannot make a decent wage, something even more precious has been stolen from them: Their pride. A man who makes less than his wife, who lives on the dole, who can't get a job, who can't pay for kids -- who can't even attract a mate because his bank account isn't flush enough -- who is divorced the moment he falls through the cracks -- such men are pale shadows of the 1950's existence. Women can talk all they want about how money doesn't matter, but the statistics show just the opposite: Whenever women make more than their men in a family, the clock is ticking -- divorce rates skyrocket to near 100%. The women in their hearts despise you, and the men in their hearts despise themselves -- both people hate every second of their lives. Probably, they'll start cheating on you with men who make more money, and become more and more flagrant about these 'hints' until you get it and accept a divorce. There's no rhyme or reason to it, it is simply how nature built men and women. Men are supposed to be the providers and protectors, if we cease to fulfill this function, women are no longer attracted to us. They have absolutely no use for us. Women have more satisfying orgasms when they are told the man they are fucking is rich compared to when they are told he is poor. That's how ridiculous it is. When we throw out traditional gender roles, it's not like evolution disappears, or instincts disappear, with them. Instead all we get is chaos and destruction.

You are ground zero of this destruction. Corporations were eager to double the size of the workforce and thus depress wages, women were eager to abandon the hard work of child birth and play 'big shot,' walking around in high heels and coats and thinking highly of themselves with their liberal arts degrees and service jobs, and men? Well, men are sexist if they don't think this is the greatest thing in human history. Fuck men. Men are obsolete, they do nothing anymore, they're good for nothing but the galleys. Maybe they can pretend to be a vibrator if they're lucky.

Without pride, what is life worth? Without a husband and children a woman can love and support, what is her life worth? We are born to play out certain roles, we are only truly satisfied when we fulfill them -- all but the degenerate psychos at least -- but no one is fulfilling them anymore. A happy few here and there? Sure. Probably they hang out with the 1% crowd getting all of America's vaunted wealth. For everyone else, there's adultery, arguments, emptiness and ephemeral relationships that produce nothing but heartache. Relationships have been so skewered, so utterly overturned, by women in the workplace, that I doubt our fertility rate, divorce rate, or anything will recover. The nuclear family is doomed in America, and due to that, every child born in America is doomed to lack a nuclear family, and all the mental illnesses and problems caused thereby. Most children will never be born at all. Women are too 'busy' to do their one and only duty in life! This hurts everyone. The fatherless, the motherless, the childless, the husbandless, the wifeless, everyone. Everyone would be happier if we returned to the old ways. That isn't chauvinism, it's common sense. It's just as good for the women to live natural lives, than men. It's no good for anyone to live like this.

Do you get it yet, slave? Do you get why your 'life expectancy, 78 (years of loneliness and meaninglessness), 46,000 per capita (deposited directly into George Soros' bank account), is nothing at all? That America can offer you nothing and no reason to live? That any child you bring into this world, will only live to see Hell from beginning to end?

So there are the sticks. You will not have a rewarding or fruitful relationship, probably any time in your life. You will never make enough money to pay off your taxes and debts. You will never get ahead because some immigrant worker or outsourcer will always be tearing you back down. You will never be safe because the government will not enforce basic law and order and subhumans prowl your neighborhoods night and day. Your very genetic existence -- whether it is your own kids, or the entire white race, is being snuffed out by low birth rates plus territory destruction. You will literally have nothing left on this earth if you are born today, by the day you die. You will have lived to see every last white family, white nation, white landmark, destroyed and conquered, raped and pillaged from the Earth. If you build something bright and beautiful, you will live to see it torn down and smashed right in front of your eyes by the jealous and feral immigrants who took your land. If you invent something, you will live to see the technology forgotten and no longer maintained, and the products rust away in landfills. If you have children, you will live to seem them raped or murdered before you. If you save up a fortune, you will see it expropriated at the point of a gun. If you do ANYTHING, it will not outlive you. Your actions will no longer have any impact or any meaning -- you will no longer be able to help anyone but parasites and destroyers. You will not live in the heart or memory of anyone on earth. No one will visit your grave or mourn your passing.

Do you get it yet? The death of the white race isn't some theoretical construct. It means your life is meaningless, and no one will ever love you. It's the death of your immortal soul. It's the second death, the death of being forgotten, of the universe wiping all trace of you from its records. It's the worst fate that could ever befall anyone. Is that stick enough for you? Is that sensational enough to get you up off your ass and do something?

If not, don't worry, I still have the carrot portion of this deal.

Here are some carrots -- Freedom of Speech, Freedom to bear Arms, Freedom of Religion. The real bill of rights, the one that we no longer have and haven't had for a century or so. Decent jobs at high wages that you are absolutely assured to get -- no non-white competitors that can take it from you. True security, where crime is completely unheard of and people can leave everything unlocked without fear. A citizen's dividend that always keeps your head above water and out of debt, paid in full to everyone equally -- no special interests -- no rewards for bad behavior -- no minorities -- taken as a giant thank you for being a proud member of our country, mainly from the rich who don't need the money anyway. Lower taxes for everyone. Eugenics that means every generation will be better than the last. A space program that gives our nation a common destiny. Every man can find a wife, and every wife a man, because marriage is mandatory at 20 and two children are mandatory by 25, and while children are growing up, women can't work beyond maybe a part time job (afterwards, knock your socks off). Divorce will not be allowed without grounds. Adultery will not be allowed, period. Schools will teach something useful and be the high point of your child's day, not prison terms. Children will laugh and play outside again.

Your race will be safe, and your memory honored for all time. You will have made the largest impact in world history, because saving the white race is the most important thing anyone could possibly do in history. You can live in a world free of lies and hypocrisy -- you can finally breathe easy and say what you really feel without punishment. The media will no longer be mocking you on TV. The streets will be clean, the houses painted, and the air clear. Everything will look beautiful -- including every person you pass on the street -- white like you with hope and joy in their faces, like the hope and joy in yours. An end to all foreign wars. A nobility of merit, not of greed, that loves their people, instead of hates us, running the show. An end to over crowding, wide open spaces, and houses you can afford.

Can you see it yet? The happiness we can fight for, but will never be given to us? In that case, become a white nationalist, in the true sense of the word, and for Christ's sake, fight for a white nation.

We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. In the end all of this 'what's in it for me' bullshit has to stop anyway. I just have to look you in the eye and ask flat out if you are going to watch the blonde haired blue eyed children running around in the parks today die forever, or if you are going to do something to save them. Are you going to betray us or not? In one case, I hope I shoot you someday. In the other, welcome aboard.

White Men Deserve Better

Next I'll detail why white men of fighting age should join the Revolution and fight for a better future. Every year, of course, the vice clamps yet harder down upon us, and the reasons become more obvious to anyone. But the offsetting rise in propaganda, brainwashing, peer pressure, ostracism, and the like keep men in line.

Moreover, it seems six tools are used to keep the white men down above all others:

Ballots, Bribes, Bitching, Brainwashing, Blathering, and Bullying.

Accompanying these are the normally healthy white man's instincts -- the desire to protect the weak, the desire to be strong and independent and tough, the desire to win status and further his reproductive success, and the like instincts that are being used against us.

If we could get white men to see past their instincts and reflect on the larger pattern, how they are being manipulated and used to benefit everyone but themselves, that vague sense of discomfort, disquiet, and disdain for the modern world should erupt into a much hotter volcano of rage, hatred, and fanaticism. A level of emotion that can actually Do something about the world we find ourselves in. A level of emotion willing to kill and die for something better.

First, a list of how we've been wronged:

1. In World Wars I and II, we were told lies by various elites to engage in a completely pointless and fratricidal war. Tens of millions of people, mainly men, died uselessly killing their own brothers, to line various people's pockets and accomplish various people's dreams. White Men as a group were certainly not helped by these wars, they mark the beginning of our decline. Nothing good has come from these wars. The awful Versailles treaty and the Bolshevik Revolution that led to the death of a 100 million people came out of WWI. Out of WWII came the Iron Curtain and the Cold War, nearly obliterating all humanity and enslaving nearly one half of whites for 50 years. Russia has still not recovered from these two world wars and the resulting triumphs of communism -- if you ask me they never will. For comparative purposes, remember the worst tragedy in human history was the supposed death of '6 million jews.'

2. Women and Non-Whites were granted the vote, completely undermining our political power. However, they were not required to share any of our civic duty. We are still the majority of the taxpayers, the majority of the army, the majority of the great thinkers, the productive class that actually has to accomplish whatever our government decides our country should do. IE, one group votes to decide what we should do, and the other group goes out and does it. How is this fair? And yet, this is the practical effect of giving women and non-whites the vote -- white men have all been conscripted into endless labor and wars we wanted no part in, and our servitude will never end because we will never be the majority no matter how many thousands of years pass.

3. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Freedom_Day In 1910, white men were paying 5% of their money into taxes. They worked for the government from January 1st to January 19th, and for the rest of the year they worked for themselves.

Today in 2010, we as a nation pay 28% of our money into taxes. We work until April 13 for the government, and are free from there on to work for ourselves. Given white men make more than women or non-whites, our tax burden is even higher. Obama has plans to dramatically raise taxes and therefore the problem only continues to worsen.

4. We have been saddled with outrageous spending programs that largely help everyone but ourselves: Social Security and Medicare for old women, since they live 5 years longer than us -- Medicaid and Welfare for women and non-whites, since they're the only ones who ever qualify for these programs. Every year white men work in order to enrich women or non-whites, and there's nothing we can do to stop it, because combined they outvote us every election. The cost to these programs are all set to skyrocket beyond anything we can imagine, to 60 trillion dollars of unpaid liabilities. At this point white men will be expected to work even harder for everyone else's gain.

5. We are sent to die in useless wars like Iraq, Afghanistan, and Vietnam, just to suit the ambitions, pockets, or dreamy ideals of the people in power. A tiny group of elites who lie us into war, inevitably making white men pay the lion's share for the achievement of their evil designs. Our blood is on their hands.

6. Every year, 500,000 white men are raped every year in the prison system. This far out scales the rape of all women raped outside the prison system. ((Not to mention how much more traumatic it is to be raped in prison by a black monster, than raped by your over-aggressive date or whatever in the outside world.)) Nothing is done to stop these rapes, there is no punishment for the men who do it, and there is no sympathy for the men who suffer. This goes well beyond cruel and unusual punishment, but simply because we are white men, no one gives a damn or will say a word in our defense. Most people find it funny and like to joke about our suffering.

7. Divorce courts have been situated so that women can unilaterally divorce their husbands for NO REASON. These 'no-fault' divorces invariably end up with women taking a major portion of the assets men have worked decades to earn, and invariably end up with custody of the children. If a man is lucky, he can see his children every now and then, but it's largely futile. The mother will poison the children against their Dad, the Dad will have little to nothing in common with the children he doesn't see often enough to have an impact on, and he'll never be there when he really wants to be there, or they really want him to be there for them. Half of all marriages end in divorce. 2/3 of the time, it was the woman who filed for the divorce. Women are as likely to cheat on their husbands as men. But unlike when men cheat, resulting only in heartbreak, when women cheat something much worse can occur -- often your own children won't even be yours. I can't get any good solid numbers, but don't be stunned if the number is around 10%. In this day and age, women simply can't be trusted. Their word means nothing. They are taught to view their word as meaning absolutely nothing. If it makes them happy, it's right, and damn the white male oppressor who gets in their way.

8. Men have no right to veto an abortion. Even if they'd adopt and raise the child on their own, the women are allowed to simply slaughter the child and move on.

9. Affirmative Action means a white man can't get the grades, the college entrance, the job, or the promotion he deserves. Affirmative Action is not a tiny 'thumb on the scale' but can be dramatic, insane numbers like a 50%, 100%, or infinite preference for anyone but a white man. White men find affirmative action so bad, they can't even be hired for government jobs.

10. Schools are designed to favor women's learning styles. The result is women get better grades and have become the majority of college goers, even though men have on average 5 IQ points more intelligence. Boys meanwhile are dosed with ritalin and literally tortured their whole way through the school system full of women teachers praising and rewarding girl students while dissing and neglecting boy students, and teaching constantly how evil and inferior white men are from 8am to 3pm via their english and history classes.

11. Around 1/3 of white women no longer even pursue children. Because of the necessity for a womb to have a child, this leaves well over a third of men to have no choice at all in the matter -- they are simply exterminated from the gene pool despite how good fathers they'd be or how much they'd love their children. The hatred women have developed for men and children means they can kill off hundreds of millions of us through this quiet non-participation in sexual reproduction, and we are allowed to do nothing in our own defense.

12. Women are more likely to initiate domestic abuse than men. And yet all the lifetime movies, all the schoolroom classes, all the media talk about is men domestically abusing women. This vicious libel leaves men unprotected and vilified.

13. Men commit suicide 4 times as often as women, we are more often the victims of crime and murder, but the only sob stories anyone ever tells are about when a woman dies: Natalie Holloway, or Stacy Peterson, or whoever the hell is on the TV at the time. No one gives a damn about our safety and no one has attempted to adjust public policy to protect the truly endangered sex's feelings.

14. White Men's thinking has been criminalized. While women and non-whites can say whatever they want: "the white race is the cancer of human history," or "women need men like a fish needs a bicycle," or "one settler, one bullet," if a man says anything 'hateful' or 'discriminatory' against women or gays or non-whites, they will be socially ostracized, fired, and possibly thrown in jail. Dozens of men around the world lay rotting in prison for verbally offending the wrong 'group.' Needless to say, there's never been any penalty for vilifying white men, nor is anyone rotting in prison for offending our sensibilities.

15. White men on TV are treated with total contempt, whether it is the show or the commercial, the men are stupid, incompetent, or evil. White men are portrayed as the criminal in every crime show, even though the vast majority of crime is done by non-whites. In fact, black WOMEN do more crime than white men. This culture of demonization encourages everyone watching it to punish us in real life, as though TV and reality were connected. Since women are the main target audience of most television shows and commercials, producers are encouraged to vilify men in this way and give women their hateful rush of delight they always get when looking down on us, their sexual adversary.

16. However, I'd say the greatest harm that was ever done to white men is when Honor was thrown in the trash and replaced with feminine virtues like tolerance, compassion, pacifism, etc. Men are good at being honest, they are good at being just, they are good at keeping their words. But when that is no longer highly regarded, when that no longer has any reward, men are forced to abandon the virtues that best fit them, and are forced to wear like drag queens the virtues of contemporary society. Of course, we always find ourselves unsuited for these virtues, and lacking in their possession compared to our 'more virtuous' women overlords. Women constantly reprimand us for not being as caring, tolerant, nice, or sympathetic as they are. They never praise us for being more honest or honorable than themselves. We have lost our very manhood and can only pretend to be pale imitations, second class women in this inverted world. The fact that our very fertility and testosterone levels have declined every generation show the physical feminization of our entire sex. We are becoming shriveled husks, fake women, weaker versions of the weaker sex. They are eradicating, physically, through some chemical in the air or just through the choking degeneracy of our culture, our very manhood.

Are you mad yet, slave? Do you want better yet, bottom of the totem pole? Apparently not! This all suits men just fine, even though this is just the tip of the iceberg and it only gets worse each year. Why do we say nothing, do nothing in protest? Why aren't we outraged? Why aren't we organizing to do something about this?

Like I said, they are skillful users of the tools they have: Ballots, Bribes, Bitching, Brainwashing, Blather, Bullying.

1. Ballots: So long as we accept the legitimacy of democracy, it doesn't matter what we think. They will always outvote us, always. The first tool we must rip from their hands is the vote. It is a weapon of war just as deadly as a nuclear bomb, and it has been waged relentlessly against us for a century!

2. Bribes: Some men can get very rich under this system, and find plenty of status and women. They will always prefer the status quo, even if it comes at our expense. Other men don't get much, but they are foolishly content with a beer in the fridge, a sports game on the television, and a meaningless life. They figure nothing matters so long as they can be 'happy.' They've lost the ability to be angry about anything, or care about anyone.

3. Bitching: Tons of men listen to the mewling whines of women and non-whites, get some giant complex of the great provider or great protector, and work endlessly to help these helpless masses. They enjoy being used, they want to be used. They couldn't stand even thinking about hurting anyone, what if they cried? No one wants to see a woman or child cry! If there is to be suffering in this world, let it be the men who suffer. We have stoic hearts and strong shoulders, we can carry everyone's weight on our back, in fact, the entire purpose and meaning of being a man is carrying everyone else's suffering and hardships on our own backs. We are like little Jesuses! Until we stop pitying them and start pitying ourselves, until we realize still water runs deep, until we realize that the squeaky wheel gets the grease, this con will continue forever.

4. Brainwashing: Due to the media and school system, men are never taught to think independently or the true facts of history. They are never taught to compare the actual positions of whites and non whites in society, or men and women in society. They are not taught to consider whether white men have done anything good in history, or have any rights of their own, or what role we should play in society. If you are raised in a completely twisted and deranged fashion, it's no wonder how few men are capable of reaching sound and healthy instincts and views.

5. Blathering: By this I mean men who say stupid crap like: "We should treat everyone as individuals," while ignoring that no one is treating US as individuals, but is preying on white men as a group. Or idealistic crap like "we should support all decent people of good morals," while ignoring how impossible this is under the current system that rewards degeneracy and corruption. Or "We can't be violent," when violence is ongoing every day against us, and not fighting back is simply suicide. The idealistic blather goes on and on, but mainly its goal is to make people powerless. To make people decide to do nothing. To make people decide that morally, they can do nothing. Idealistic Blather is often a mask for cowardice, when people know what they should do but don't want to pay the price to do it. But often enough, the people genuinely mean it, having had such a dumb or soft childhood, having never thought the implications of their 'virtue' through to the end results, that they are idiots through and through. Of course the main pushers of all this idealistic blather are rarely white men, even though they are shackled by accepting said beliefs.

6. Bullying: When any white man shows an ounce of courage or independence, everyone from all sides denounces him and forces him into groveling apologies. It is rare for any white man to stand up against charges like "racist!" "sexist!" "homophobe!" "anti-semite!" "nut!" "extremist!" "loser!" Instead they will crawl into their shells and bow and scrape for their reputation back. This verbal bullying which keeps everyone in line, keeps men from encouraging each other, or developing their mentality further along said lines. Without the ability to unite, encourage each other, and inform each other, men are always left cowering on their own, assuming they are alone, that they are isolated, that they are helpless, that they must be insane or evil to believe what they believe. So long as men are kept huddling by these worthless words, we will always be the slave class. The internet can stop this -- but courage has to play its part too. Eventually men are going to have to grow a pair and ignore all the insults flung at them -- come what may.

None of these tools are impossible to overcome. With the right mindset, none of them can stop a white lion. A white warrior. We cannot be plead with, bribed off, shouted down, sophistically misled, mind controlled, or out-voted, unless we want to be. The question is, are we going to sit here and take this crap forever? Or will we find out of the vast sea of 500 million white men worldwide, a MEASLY 3 MILLION who cannot be controlled? If there aren't enough good men left in the world to defend even a tiny corner of our existence, then oh well. Let the Asians have the Earth. We should all just die and go to Hell.

More Details and Benefits of the Revolution:

When you filter out the women, children, and elderly of any population, you are left with a very small core of men who are actually maintaining civilization.

According to the CIA World Factbook, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html there are 100 million men aged 15-64 in the USA. The country is 65% white (supposedly), so that would leave 65 million white men. However this is a bit off, because many non-whites are on average younger than whites. It would be more likely to say there are something like 75 million white men in this category. Median age for men of the country is 35 years old. This helps us know how many men of fighting age we're really discussing here, with a cutoff of say 40 instead of the rather absurd 64. For every white male above age 35, there's one below age 35. So these 75 million whites should split largely past the cutoff age. 15-35 should be as numerous as 35-55, so that gives us around 40 million white men of fighting age.

These forty million white men must someday conquer the country that has stabbed them in the back for the last hundred years or so, though said betrayal has been rapidly accelerating in the last few decades. In a country of 300 million people, that's 13% of the population. As in, with white men of fighting age alone, we have sufficient numbers for a revolution. They would be up against women, children, aged grannies, and the non-white men (around 15 million) who are historically well known for being some of the weakest and easiest pushovers in wartime possible. I'm not worried about ANY of those groups. However, if say, 20 million white men attempted a revolution, and had to fight 20 million white men, 15 million non-white men, a gaggle of old people, children, and women, it becomes much dicier. First off, so long as we keep this a white men vs. non-white men thing, we can butcher only non-whites to secure the existence of our people. Second, the closer a war's sides are, the more bloody the battles become. If one side has overwhelming force, hardly anyone has to die. If the sides are evenly matched, the war just goes on forever -- like the horrors of WWI. That's why we should try very hard to recruit white men into a revolutionary mindset -- we want them to be signing the petition and we don't really need anyone else whether they sign it or not. If say, 3/4 of white men of fighting age (15-40) are in on the conspiracy, we could rather quickly disarm or take prisoner those who weren't in on the conspiracy, make it very clear how outnumbered and out-serioused the remaining white males were, and then concentrate all our firepower on the non-white men in our midst and go for a real turkey shoot. I wouldn't bet on victory without that kind of majority.

So now we've narrowed it down to 30 million white men who are needed to win a revolutionary war against the 300 million citizenry at large. Humorously, that puts us exactly back to my ballot: 'If 10% of the people revolt, I will revolt.' 10% seems to be the magic number -- so long as it includes 75% of white men of fighting age. With that kind of majority, the battle will be short, it will be relatively bloodless (for both sides), and it will go in our favor. Afterwards we can do whatever we like with the remaining population, with the basic knowledge that anyone who disagrees with our decisions has only one other option and that is to die. By the time we are ready to revolt, we will also be ready to make the revolt stick -- all thoughts of mercy, morality, compassion, justice, etc will out the window and the traditional tactics of the weak, voting bribing and whining, will mean nothing to us.

If we can't garner this 75% of white men country-wide, it is easy enough to scale down to a smaller segment of the country. Say we can't find 30 million white men with guts, we can only find 3 million. All hope isn't lost, the revolt could still be staged (though admittedly a much dicier one.) Instead of trying to retake and dictate to all of America however, it could be for a small piece of America.

Look at the populations of these states: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_and_territories_by_population

Wyoming: 532,000
North Dakota: 641,000
Alaska: 686,000
South Dakota: 804,000
Montana: 967,000
Idaho: 1,523,000

Add them all up, you have a population of: 5,153,000.

That's right, nearly half of America's real estate has all of 5 million people in it. That's ripe territory for a two stage revolution. First, we move to those states, preferably with women and children who love and support us. Second, we revolt and seize all those states, preferably with as little bloodshed as possible, and massive overwhelming numbers. We then work ASAP to use the military bases in these regions, the nuclear silos, and the like to hold the rest of the USA at bay, and make them think twice before invading and crushing our little rebellion. Because it impacts very few American's lives to lose a giant chunk of America that has stubbornly neglected to be occupied by anyone anyway, because no one wants to get nuked for 'flyover country,' and because we are extremely dangerous sons-of-bitches no one wants to fuck with anyway, it should be possible to secure an existence for our people and a future for white children.

Three million men can revolt and occupy half the United States and, without more than a few shots fired, stare down the US government and the whole world. Hard to believe eh? But I've already run the numbers by you and they are solid. From there we could do a number of things, including invite anyone who agrees with our principles into this nearly empty quarter of America. With additional numbers from the US and the entire white world (all of whom by then will be desperate for escape from their multicult hellholes), we could soon have a truly populated nation, much larger than most countries on earth, and with the people to settle, reproduce, and hold our precious sovereign soil. There could be nothing more precious than a white homeland for the whole world's refugees as the 21st century winds down and demolishes every last country whites previously ruled. naturally everyone stuck within our suddenly declared borders who wished to leave, or we had no wish to be here, could emigrate or be deported respectively. After enough of these population transfers (and at most we're talking about deporting a meager 5 million people here), our country would be composed of pure White Nationalists. A healthy country with no cancers of unassimillable subhumans breeding in their midst, and no poisonous ideologies being whispered in the classrooms or on our TV screens.

There may well be a lot more men than women in this country, maybe a lot of men will be fighting with no hope of personal reproductive success. Who cares? The next generation of children will come out all right: 50% men, 50% women. That first generation of women may need to be a little heroic in their efforts to help people our country, but it should soon simmer down. And it is self-evident that children raised in a healthy white nationalist environment, without poison from abroad telling them to do unnatural things like race-mixing, homosexuality, careerism, or whore-mongering, will fit perfectly well into marriage and children and the true beginning of our white nation. For all the men who fought for the rights of other men and other women to have healthy, free, white children -- isn't that reward enough? First off, we're all genetically related, so they are in fact your children. Second off, this was our dream, it's enough to see it realized before we die -- it doesn't matter who. Third, if you have children outside this zone of safety, they would probably be miserable anyway. What future does the white race have outside our homeland? Any? I don't see any. Just rape, theft, and eventually murder for every last one of us. The men will be worked as galley-slaves, paying 99% taxes, while the women will work the harems, pimped out and kept high on drugs.

The flag for when the revolution is on will be when 75% of the white men of fighting age in these remotely settled states have signed onto the petition. That will require so little of us! So very little is necessary to stand up against our government, with nukes vs. nukes, planes vs. planes. A few million men, and the courage of our convictions.

After the war is won and our independence is granted, we could even set up a confederacy type government with little federal oversight except for free trade, common currency, common defense and the like. On the local scale, people could organize into yet purer communities of a single faith (or lack thereof), single political model (libertarian, anarchist, national socialist, communist, socialist, who cares? It will only be on that community's head and it won't adversely affect anyone who doesn't want to be a part of it.), and single philosophical model (criminal code, harsh or lenient? marriage, arranged or voluntary? gays, in or out? Abortion, legal or illegal?)

Every remaining controversy between white nationalists can thus be resolved without anyone oppressing or abusing anyone. It will be settled on the local level, people will sort themselves to where they feel most comfortable, and most importantly, it will not imperil our ability to maintain a strong front against the outside world, and keep the common defense necessary to defend our incredibly precious territory, the last white territory on earth.

Someday, if our enemies weaken or we grow in strength, centuries down the line, we could attempt to grab some more land from our friendly neighbors. However, that seems rather pointless, when the entire universe full of innumerable planets awaits us in Space. If our white homeland built, say, a space elevator, and sent a colony to Mars, or to Alpha Centauri, or just into the depths of space where no one will find us again -- we'll have infinite resources, and we'll truly be separated from our enemies once and for all. All local concerns about the Earth's territory will become petty and superfluous. The main benefit of a white homeland is not the temporary rescue of our race from complete annihilation in the outside world -- it is the chance to colonize space with the right sort of people, and be free of non-whites (or simply retarded whites who can't get their heads on straight) forever. That's where all of our excess energy should be pointed, and believe me, with the power of eugenics and the strength of our dedication, we CAN be the leaders of any technology we damn well choose to be. White Separatism can only truly exist among the stars -- our future has nothing to do with the outside world, nor is any conflict with the outside world desirable. Manifest Destiny no longer points west, it points UP.

I see no weak point in this plan. If people don't adopt it, if they aren't actually willing to fight for a white nation, they simply aren't white nationalists. That's how I feel. Hopefully 3 million others will grow to feel the same way, and soon.