9/11 Truth

http://www.ae911truth.org/flashmov11.htm

Watch this video, and then you tell me what the truth is.

I still don't know. I've watched many videos like '9/11 missing links,' 'loose change,' and read many sites claiming irrefutable proof 9/11 was an inside job. None of them approached the level of convincing to me. However, this video is different. Finally there appears the smoking gun, forensic evidence that is direct instead of circumstantial: traces of thermite byproducts in the pulverized dust from the world trade centers. There can be no innocent explanation for these chemicals. But can I trust this website? Maybe they are simply lying, or fabricating their data. How can I, a non-expert, know the technical issues they are discussing? Will other experts come in and show that these experts are full of shit, and I've simply been hoodwinked? Over and over again experts across the field have claimed a fire brought down all three WTC buildings and used all sorts of fancy jargon and computer simulations to prove their point. Are they lying? I'd prefer to go with my gut. Freefall collapses that look like controlled demolitions that fall perfectly inward three times in one day are probably exactly what they look like. Occam's razor should apply in all such controversies, and this one falls decidedly on the '9/11 Truthers' side.

I have always found the issue suspicious. Considering our history of false flag attacks and lies that have gotten us into practically every war in our history: the gulf of tomkin, the WMD that were supposedly in Iraq, the Lusitania, Pearl Harbor being deliberately provoked and deliberately leaving the people there vulnerable even though we knew the attack was coming through decoded intercepts, the mysterious sinking of the Maine -- our entire history is riddled with lies and false flag attacks. It would not be extraordinary or even surprising to find out yet another lie lies behind the inception of this 'war on terror.' The whole world is living multiple lies and delusions, there are nine lies being circulated in 'popular culture' for every one shred of truth. It is a lie that all races have equal genetic potential for high intelligence. It is a lie that any jews were gassed in the Holocaust, much less 6 million. It is a lie that men and women are the same and interchangeable. It is a lie that the gay lifestyle is healthy and normal. (In fact, it is so unhealthy that gays have a lower lifespan due to their behavior than smokers or drinkers could ever dream of -- perhaps as low as in their 40's. Nor is it 'healthy' for the society around them, gays are ten times as likely to be pedophiles, they have much higher rates of crime and mental illnesses in general, and every society which has embraced the gay lifestyle has soon after collapsed)

So would I be surprised if 9/11 were another lie? That liars at the top of our society have masterminded the murder of 3,000 people in cold blood, then used this lie to justify foreign wars that have killed hundreds of thousands more? No, that doesn't surprise me. There have been many more lies, all larger than this one, that are responsible for the deaths of millions. We would be naive to believe elites have ever once cared about their underlings, or treated us as anything but disposable trash, across history. It was a lie that the communist revolution would bring a worker's paradise. Instead it brought the deaths of 100 million innocent people, and the impoverishment of all the rest. Did that stop the liars from enacting their plans? Does it ever stop the liars from enacting their plans?

Maybe Gage is simply falsifying his data, maybe there's some innocent explanation for all this I can't fathom because I'm not an expert. Maybe. But this is the best video for 9/11 truth out there, nothing else even approaches the quality and expertise displayed by this presentation. The fact is new information is slipping out every year that keeps casting doubt on the official story. The fact is the government is hiding evidence from us, starting with their recycling of all the steel from those towers so that not a single investigator could check for evidence of explosives before the entire crime scene was whisked away. The fact is no independent investigation has been given full access to the on-board flight tapes or other relevant information like video tapes showing the pentagon attack, and that it's pointless for the government to investigate itself, when it's the main suspect of the crime!!! Absurd, and yet, this type of commission keeps churning out 'reports' on how innocent it is, as though we could trust a damn word they said on the matter. The fact is hundreds of eye-witnesses report explosions and molten steel, things a fire cannot produce. The fact is not a single one of the planes was intercepted by a seemingly criminally 'inept' air force--were they given a stand down order or something? Or perhaps they were distracted by the four simultaneous 'drills' the government inscrutably scheduled to be carried out that same day during the attacks. How fucking suspicious is that? If that doesn't raise alarm bells, what will? The fact that 'anti-terror' drills were also being done on 7/7, the day of the London bombings? It's as if we know ahead of time when these attacks are going to happen. Hmmmmmmm.

What relation does Al-Qaeda then have to the theory of a controlled demolition planned months in advance and merely set off under the cover of the plane strikes on 9/11? I have no idea. Every explanation possible sounds ludicrous on the face of it. Perhaps instead of speculating, it would be better to arrest and interrogate the members of our government and just find out what exactly they were thinking, how they planned it, what relations they have to Al Qaeda, etc. Then they can tell us directly how it happened, instead of us trying to piece it together in total darkness. I hear waterboarding got Khalid Sheik Mohammed to admit to planning the 9/11 attacks. Let's start waterboarding Bush, Cheney, Armitage, Feith, Rice, and all that gang and see if it yields equal fruit. What have we got to lose? I hear it's not even torture and just some harmless act of 'enhanced interrogation.' If they're innocent, surely we'd find out soon enough.

But our government would never attack our own people right? They would never kill innocent civilians, right? Tell that to the branch dravidians at Waco. Tell that to the wife of Randy Weaver at Ruby Ridge. Tell that to the nearly 200 people who mysteriously died that were connected to Bill Clinton in various sleazy ways on the Clinton Death List. There is an undercurrent of murder by our government constantly hovering in the background, the lies are simply overwhelming and many who have spoken out have ended up dead. Car accidents, plane accidents, 'suicides', and 'unexplained deaths' have claimed the lives of numerous opponents of the powers that be. George Patton. George Lincoln Rockwell. Jorg Haider. (and that's just the George's!! O.O) Charles Lindbergh's child. Huey Long. Pim Fortuyn. The more you look into it, the scarier it gets. There is another world operating beneath the world we are painted by the media, full of governments murdering political enemies just like we saw with the Communists. It is pure naivety to believe anything different. 9/11 fits perfectly well into this shadow world of death and murder for political ends. In this world, it isn't extraordinary, it's predictable.

Did the jews pull off 9/11? It's quite possible. The jew Silverstein recently became the owner of the buildings just a few months before the attacks. Jewish Mossad agents were caught dancing in glee on top of a white van taping the world trade center's destruction. ((they were, of course, later arrested without explanation and fled back to Israel.)) Jewish security agencies oversaw the flight security systems that failed to catch any of the hijackers before they boarded their planes. Mossad agents were tracking Atta and lived right alongside him the days before the attack. And jews, of course, gained the most from the 9/11 attacks. Because of 9/11, we were sent into two hopeless wars for Israel that have done nothing but waste trillions of dollars and antagonize the muslim world.

But how am I, a layman with no special access to the shadow world of intelligence, spies, government secret meetings, Mossad and so on supposed to come to an informed conclusion about these things? I can't. Maybe someday we will discover in some secret archives documents proving a jewish connection to 9/11 -- just as 50 or a 100 years later we are discovering soviet archives documenting the massacre at Katyn forest, a massacre they denied during their entire reign up until 1990. It's obvious jews couldn't have done it without the US government knowing about it and colluding with it. So in the end, we are back to the same nightmare alliance of jews and white elites with their genocidal campaign against middle class whites all across the world. Is it any surprise that they'd be working together in this matter as well? When are they not trying to kill us, lie to us, or steal our money? Across history, the birth rates of the peasant class in Europe have always been below replacement (considering the constant famine and plagues) whereas the nobility have always been above replacement (it helps to have a harem, or just good health!). Regularly branches of the nobility would end up filling the positions of the ever dwindling peasantry and citizenry (all cities were death traps and population sinks until about 1900) and repeating the endless cycle. They never showed the working class mercy then, they never worried what the human price was of their taxes, tithes, and luxurious living back then. Why would they start caring now? They treat us like cattle, and that's all we'll ever be to them. Sending cattle to the slaughter is the right of all cattle owners, and if it somehow is to their advantage, why would they think twice before giving the okay?

In the end, I am going to continue sitting on the fence. I don't think there's enough evidence to say what happened on 9/11. What I do want is a more thorough investigation, with much more collection and analysis of evidence, than we currently have managed. Eight years after the attacks, most Americans and most people across the world still believe our governments are lying to us about 9/11. It's time to shine the light of truth onto this most mysterious of days and answer the unanswered questions we all have. That there is a possibility it was an inside job, considering the physical evidence we currently have, the eyewitness reports, the lies about everything else our government tells us, the history of false flag attacks that have gotten us into previous wars, and the heartlessness of our elites toward us as displayed by their genocidal policies of immigration already -- is indisputable. If this possibility turns out to not hold water, fine. There is no reason to believe our government is guilty of every single suspicion I hold against it, or every single atrocity that occurs on earth. But if it does hold water, it's part of a larger pattern of lies and atrocities that have spanned centuries. And it's also part of waking up America to the horrible agenda being waged against it on all levels. If the government is lying about 9/11, what else is it lying about?

The truth about 9/11 is thus a powerful tool for the Truth in general. If the government is lying to us about 9/11, people will suddenly realize BIG LIES are running their entire lives. That lies are getting us into wars, costing trillions of dollars, killing millions of people, and that liars at the very top are successfully hiding these lies for decades and centuries from the general public. If 9/11 was a conspiracy, how many other conspiracies are out there, still undiscovered? How many other conspiracies must we be on guard against? 9/11 Truth is a gateway to Truth in general. Therefore a full investigation into all the claims alleged about 9/11 by independent experts from all across the globe is necessary. Furthermore, if the physical evidence is convincing, we must arrest and interrogate all possible members of the conspiracy in the government all the way down to the people who planted the bombs. Only then will the full story of that day come to light.

Frankly, if the Holocaust is a hoax (and all physical evidence says it is), then I can believe anything. Absolutely anything could be a lie. 9/11 wouldn't surprise me at all. Compared to the Holocaust, it's piss in the wind. And regardless of whether it's true or false, it changes nothing about the larger picture.

Whether the Holocaust happened or not, whether 9/11 was an inside job or not, immigration continues the silent genocide of every white nation on earth. Whether jews are good people or not, whether gays are good people or not, immigration continues the silent genocide of every white nation on earth. If immigration isn't stopped, everything else is irrelevant. I am simply terrified by the consequences of this worldwide migration. In fifty to one hundred years, a race as old as time and responsible for 90% of everything good on God's green earth, is going to go extinct. It will be wiped out by a tidal wave of dysgenic, good for nothing mud-sludge monsters, and their elite enablers whose hatred for the white race and the common folk knows no bounds. Our cities will resemble detroit, Bombay or Rio De Janero. Instead of the beautiful fair skin, blue eyes, proud demeanor, and blushing cheeks, we will be surrounded by jungle apes, coal black, short, dirty, squat, fat, ugly, flat-nosed and obviously stupid, shambling from place to place, full of drugs and AIDS and shitting in the streets. Instead of colonizing the stars and tracing a blaze of glory across the universe, our journey will end right here, with the ruins of our past skyscrapers emptied out overlooking a stone age village full of mud huts. It couldn't happen? Tell that to the british who lived in the ruins of the Roman empire, unable to craft the buildings that rotted around them, the glass, the pottery, or anything else. And those were whites. Now imagine blacks and mestizos trying to inherit the culture of the Enlightenment! Try to imagine the half literate moors trying to inherit Paris, the Notre Dame cathedral, the Eiffel tower and the Louvre? Can you imagine? I can't. It makes my stomach churn. I know exactly what it will look like. The buddhas of bamiyan already paint the way!

God, there are none so blind as those who will not see. If immigration isn't stopped, and reversed, then the whole white western world is going to collapse in on itself. And there is no guarantee that the East Asian world won't follow after! Their birth rates, after all, are lower than ours. And the bug of multiculturalism media floats around in their ears and buzzes in their PC adjusted brains as often as our own. When lies like 'diversity is our greatest strength' are pushed on us every day for the last 50 years -- the government is capable of anything. They are all traitors and villains, whether they did 9/11 or not, and they all deserve to be tortured and hung, whether the Holocaust happened or not. Their is no describing the depths of their evil or the horrible damage they are doing to our world -- to each and every white person, white child, and white family that lives on this planet. The very best people on earth are being delivered to the worst tragedy in history, a genocide of 500 million people! It's unbelievable. And yet our own media celebrates it with cheers, and we all march ahead to the slaughterhouse without even a bleat of protest. Without even lifting a hand in resistance.

Questioning the lies our government tells us is our first act of resistance. Uncovering the lies and promulgating the truth is our next act of resistance. Only when the majority of our people are convinced that everything has been a lie, will a new way of life be able to emerge from the rubble. Only then will the people support any attempt at a reformation of our society along new, Godly principles that take into account all the Big Truths of this world. There is nothing more suspicious than the day of 9/11. If this is the weakest chink in the lies of our 'Masters,' then we would be remiss to not fully exploit them. If it isn't a weakness, oh well, let's try and strike elsewhere. If it is, however, then we should plunge the knife in as deep as we can and never let off, not until every last head has rolled. Not until the day of the rope has hanged every traitor on earth. Investigating 9/11 is therefore a pure opportunity, with no drawback. If it's exactly as the official story said, oh well, at least now we know. If it isn't -- bam. We have our first lie to present to the public at large, and the blood of 3,000 innocents directly at the hands of our own government. That, my friends, is fuel for revolution.

On Collective Guilt

I agree with Solzhenitsyn: we are all responsible for the actions of our group. We are all guilty for what the least of us does. This is where libertarians and individualists balk, claiming we are all atomized egos with no connection to anyone else, and we have nothing to do with the actions or decisions of others. We aren't responsible for what our ancestors did, our descendants do, our nation or our race. We aren't responsible for anything!

Whatever fantasy world libertarians live in, this is the truth:

"No man is an island, we are all a part of the main. Therefore ask not for whom the bell tolls, it tolls for thee."

Man is a herd animal, no one exists on his own, we form groups and think in terms of group consensus. The pressure to conform and be liked by our peers exerts itself on everyone. How we are raised will have a dramatic impact on how we lead our lives in the future, the values we are taught and the beliefs we are given, whether in school, church, or the media, control us, make us who we are. If one person, somewhere, anywhere, does something -- you can bet ten people told him to do it, ten thousand people approved of what he did, and ten million people have thought along the same lines at some point in their lives. There is no such thing as a person acting in isolation.

A palestinian suicide bomber is not an isolated whacko, he is an emergent force from the culture of his community. After fifty years of vitriol against Israel and praise for martyrdom, after 1400 years of Islam and stories of paradise for those who die for Allah, after tv sets, charitable donations, and international sympathizers all agree Israel is in the wrong and deserves to be bombed, a palestinian suicide bomber is an inevitable end result. Just as unstable elements decay randomly but their half life is predictable by a mathematical formula, a culture will create suicide bombers at random among a random assortment of 'individuals,' but the mathematical inevitability and perfectly predictable occurrence of these suicide bombers was set up well in advance -- by the community.

Nothing happens by accident. Everything happens for a reason. Every effect has a pre-existing cause, all the way to the Big Bang. This world is determined, not chaotic, and thus it is pointless to say someone 'acted on his own, as an individual.' Nonsense. When the earth was just forming out of a bunch of interstellar dust, it was already laying down the pre-conditions for that person's mentality and decisions. If the environment were different and history had played out some other way, people's decisions in the present would also be completely different. If people's genes were different and they had different ancestors, their inherent predilictions and mindsets would also be different. An individual is the end product of an endless chain of causation, all of which had its part in determining that 'isolated individual's' choices. If the person has a gene for schizophrenia and goes on a crazy paranoid rampage, it isn't because he individually chose to do it, it's because his parents gave him that gene, who in turn inherited it from their parents, and so on. And the gene was never bred out of that line because the environment made mild forms of schizophrenia mildly advantageous. Perhaps it made people more cautious, or more objective and less likely to go along with the crowd, maybe it gave people higher IQ. In any event, the entire world, through evolution, selected for that child to be born with schizophrenia. Then when he acts upon this built-in brain disorder, we go up in arms declaring it a 'lone psycho on a rampage.' Nonsense. He was never alone. He was part of the tapestry of life since the first fish crawled out of the ocean. He has been shaped by ten million generations of living beings each of whom had a role in the final genetic template he would be born with, and an environment that made his genetic template so successful it has survived all the way until this very day. That's four billion years of successful life this world has nurtured, going on a crazy rampage. A lone individual??

Once we understand that our genes are shared with those 'lone psychos' or 'evil villains of the past,' that we are essentially the same as them, only transposed across time, it is nonsense to say we have nothing to do with them. Inside us are the exact same genes that in the past committed horrible atrocities or crimes. If our white ancestors, or our white descendants, or our white neighbors do something reprehensible, the first thing we should do is seek to understand what part of our collective white identity may have been responsible for his actions. As solzhenitsyn said, we all all guilty, and our recompense, our restitution for our collective guilt, must be to understand what just happened. And upon understanding, guard against making the same mistake ourselves, we who have so much in common with the 'isolated individual' sinner both biologically and culturally. Furthermore, we must make sure nothing in our culture is causing these 'aberrations' and 'atrocities' with clockwork regularity. This is the amazing deceit practiced by Islam every day on TV: "This is not Islam. Islam has nothing to do with terrorism. Most muslims aren't terrorists. These aren't real muslims." And yet, almost all terrorism on earth IS perpetrated by muslims. Islam DOES have something to do with terrorism. Deny it all they want, it is impossible for such a pattern to form ex nihilo, purely randomly. What muslims are doing, is not taking collective guilt for the actions of their tribe, and thus making it impossible to reform Islam in such a way that terrorism would stop occurring among its 'isolated nuts,' making it impossible to understand what could be wrong with Islam, making it impossible to find the evil in our own hearts and blindly believing we are perfect just because we ourselves have not 'cracked' (yet). If we do not use the opportunity of the wrongdoing of others to improve and guard against ourselves, what will we wait for? Until we have done evil too? How is that fair to the victims of our crimes?

"Sorry, I knew there was something dark in my genes, when I saw that blacks were ten times as likely to be murderers than whites, and I knew the ghetto lifestyle glorified violence and excused anyone from bad behavior with various blame whitey kneejerk responses, but I did nothing about it. I figured, sure evil triumphs in the hearts of other men, exactly like me, who have the same exact culture as me and grew up learning the same values and beliefs I did -- but it could never happen with me.

Bullshit. It could happen to any of us. That is why, when it happens to any of us, we must all admit that this was not a lone individual's actions, but a set of genetic and environmental factors that had a 100% of occurring, then randomly rolled to see through which of us individuals it would be expressed. As in, if you are not the murderer today, it isn't because you are different or better than the murderer, but simply because evil has a 1/10,000 chance of rolling you or one of the 9,999 people just like you, and today it rolled one of the 9,999. Is the person rolled more guilty of the murder than you are? Not really, more like less lucky, that is all. Between the 10,000 of you, all of you are guilty, collectively, but only a little -- you are all guilty of 1/10,000 of a murder. That doesn't make you very evil, maybe it makes you almost purely good, and yet there is a stain. There is an error in the world, and we are all culpable. . .we are all potential victims of this error. Until and unless we address the evil in our own hearts, we will always be capable of repeating the actions of those who have gone before us, or followed after us, or stand alongside us, and have done evil.

Collective guilt is the only path to moral rejuvenation. We cannot wait until everyone at some point in their life has abused a slave, raped a woman, rounded up people into a gulag, cheated on their husband, abandoned a child, or kicked a kitten before we start reflecting on our beliefs, values, and genes. Know thyself, was Socrates' most vital lesson. Alongside that goes the phrase, 'the unexamined life is not worth living.' When our ancestors committed horrible atrocities, the sin stays with us to the tenth generation. When whites took blacks as slaves and peopled the Americas with blacks with no rights instead of free fellow whites who could negotiate for their labor, advance themselves through education, marry whoever they pleased, vote for who would represent them in government, and so on -- we unveiled something dark and evil about the white race on that day. To this day, if we do not take collective responsibility for this sin, we will never learn from it. Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it -- look what we are doing now! Flooding America with non-whites who can't vote and have little ability to negotiate their contracts, since they are illegal immigrants, people without even a high school education ghettoized by language, racial, and cultural barriers from ever assimilating with white America. What does this sound like? To me, it sounds a lot like slavery. It sounds a lot like the white genome expressing itself like it always does, the will to power, the will to substituting free and fair competition between whites with a pliant, uncompetitive, controlled labor force we can lord over in our plantation mansions while the untermenschen PICK OUR CROPS. I swear to God, the more things change the more they stay the same! This atrocious sin, this return to slave labor, is all because we as a people have not reflected on why slavery is evil, on why whites are so prone to rely on slave labor, on why our culture inevitably leads to slave labor, and so on.

Instead I keep hearing the whiny white excuses: "My ancestors weren't slaveholders." So what? We are all related genetically, we are all basically cousins, the entire white race. if any white anywhere had slaves, you are genetically related to that slaveholder, just as much as a great-great-great-grandchild is related. IE, very little. And yet, there it is again, the spread out, diffused collective stain that is expressed in only one person, but that person is no more evil or deranged than the rest of us, just unlucky that his number was chosen to express this collective weakness in our kind.

"I come from Ireland after slavery was abolished in the USA, I'm not to blame."

Of course you're to blame. Are you saying that if you'd come from Ireland before slavery was abolished, no Irish would have taken to slavery and holding slaves? That's just factually untrue. There were Irish slaveholders, there is nothing unique about the Irish culture or genome, that would have resisted the urge. You are as much responsible as anyone else is, because you are white just like we are.

"Other people took slaves too!"

So what? Does that somehow excuse us for doing it? Slavery hurts whites more than any other race, because it corrupts us, forces middle class whites into penury trying to compete with the unfair system, and ultimately leads to race-replacement and extinction. Your sin isn't somehow offset when a muslim takes a white slave, a black takes another black slave, or a jew ships a black slave across the ocean.

"I come from the North, we fought to end slavery."

So what? If your ancestors had lived in the south where the intensive farming economy was needed, do you think they would have held the same high-fallutin' values? Of course not, there is nothing genetically distinct between the north and the south, economic conditions were the only difference that led to slavery being practiced where it was economically viable, but not where it wasn't. In fact, hilly regions in the South were also anti-slavery, despite being the next-door neighbors and genetic kin of the slavers. Is this due to their virtue? Did they for instance decide, "I'll never hold slaves, so instead I'll find the worst farmland I can find in the south, full of rocks and with little rainfall, and thus have no need for slave labor to pick my crops."

More likely they were the unfortunate who couldn't get the choice land, resigned themselves to never having slaves or fields that needed slaves, and then made a virtue of of necessity by insisting everyone else shouldn't have slaves either! This is how the real world works. This is the world of collective responsibility, where no man can abjure his share of sin, his duty to the world and his moral need to examine and reflect upon his life and soul.

Once we understand that we are related genetically to every member of our race, whether in the past, present, or future, and that genes largely determine our personality and behavior, our very values and ideals, we cannot escape being in some part just like the sinners all around us. Furthermore, insofar as any cultural artifact or religious belief or ideology contributed to these actions, we who cleave to this culture, religion, or ideology despite its failures and wrong-doing are collectively guilty for their crimes. Did Christianity do evil in the name of Christianity? Indubitably. From the prosecution of Galileo and Bruno, to the 30 years war, to the witch hunts, to the sacking of Constantinople during the 4th Crusade, to every pope who sold indulgences or abused his power and wealth, to every king given the right to abuse and impoverish his peasantry through his 'divine right' to rule and every bishop who crowned an unjust emperor as God's secular representative. Those who are Christian today, must like inside their hearts, study Christianity deeply, and discover where Christianity went wrong, how it can be enacted differently, and what should be changed or interpreted to reach a better world. Otherwise, they are just as guilty as those who came before it. There is no difference between an evil-doer and those who endorse the crime, they may as well all be strung up together. Therefore, for anyone who embraces an evil culture while refusing to correct it in their own lives and time period, are simply carte blanche endorsing every single sin in the entire history of that religion, ideology, or culture. Islam is the very worst. Their jihadi wars, which still haven't stopped even today, have killed HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of innocent people and enslaved billions to an evil, destructive ideology that lowers the quality of life for everyone under it -- both believers and conquered dhimmis. Anyone who is Muslim today, who does not rebuke the evil inherent in Islam, who does not condemn Muhammed and the Caliphs, who does not denounce the treatment of minorities and suppression of science and literacy within Islam's borders -- is collectively guilty for all the sins of Islam everywhere, and across all time. They are an adherent to an evil they refuse to disown, and in fact support every day of their lives.

The same is true of Communism, and Nazism. Those who adopt these ideologies, who slaughtered millions of innocent people, while not criticizing any aspect of them or showing how they would do things differently if they ever achieved power, are simply the exact same people who did those killing 50/80 years ago. They clearly wouldn't have minded starving millions of kulaks to death, or deporting innocent millions to destinations in siberia they never survived to reach, they would have been right there smoking and laughing with the rest of the Berias, Stalins, Trostkys and Kaminovs as the Russian nation was brutally murdered from stem to stern. We must take responsibility for the cultures we embrace and practice. If there is a darkness in our culture (and what culture has NEVER done ANYTHING wrong, can a system invented by human beings ever be purely Good -- the product of such imperfect and faulty vessels as the human mind?), we cannot simply look the other way and say "mistakes were made." Or "that was then, this is now." Or "I didn't do any of that." Nonsense. It doesn't matter what you have done, it matters what you would have done given the same circumstances. That is the question. And when the day of similar circumstances arises, where will you stand? In the camps, starving and diseased? Or guarding the camps, in a tower surrounded by barbed wire, watching the people inside starve and die without compassion or remorse?

I am still angry with China for their practice of foot binding. Chinese today should be ashamed for their rejection of the human body, the deliberate crippling of women, and their sense of luxury that meant it was honorable and praise-inducing to lack the ability to walk and have to be carried everywhere by personal slaves.

The Japanese are my favorite people on earth, and yet 50 years ago they set about genociding, torturing, and summarily executing innocent people all around them in the tens of millions. Today they refuse to take responsibility for these crimes and shield their children away from learning about them. And yet, there are still Japanese living today who participated in these crimes!! That is how little distance exists between the Japan of then and the Japan of today. Is there any part of Japanese culture that could have created this warlike barbarism? Is there any part of the Japanese genome? Should Japanese be searching their hearts for answers, seeking to understand how they came to such murderous intentions, and making sure the conditions for such a maneuver being endorsed by the government and the people wholeheartedly never arise again? If not, it will simply lurk there, festering inside the japanese soul. I love Japan too much to see them sin again, not when they offer such wonderful values as seen in One Piece today. But if nothing is done to distance the Japanese spirit from its plan to conquer China and rule half the world through blood and terror, what's to stop them from trying again?

And now for you, oh Chosen people, you jews! Do not give me this crap, "I'm not responsible, those were jews in Russia, isolated individuals, and atheist communists. I'm a jew in America, I'm orthodox religious, and a capitalist. Do not seek to escape collective guilt. Because somewhere in the jewish genome, the same story plays out again, and again, and again. There is a pattern to jewish behavior, it is never isolated or a scattering of individuals. It is supported by world Jewry as a whole, and would never have succeeded without the jewish mass movements that undergird them. When a century's worth of jews all insist that IQ is not genetic and blacks are equal to whites, it is no longer an isolated individual. It is a collective movement. When jews all across Europe led every single Communist party as well as the Bolshevik revolution, it is no longer an isolated individual, it is a collective movement. And when jews wantonly murder and ethnic cleanse Palestinians, it is not just the actions of "Israel," but all the world's jews who support Israel, argue for it, and worship the same Deity and Torah that ordered the jews thousands of years ago to slaughter all the Palestinians of that time as well. The same jews who celebrate as religious holidays slaughters like Purrim where 40,000 babylonians are killed, or slaughters like Passover where every firstborn egyptian was killed, even newborn babes! The same jews pushing multi-culturalism and muslim 3rd world invasion of Europe today, were the jews opening the gates to Spain and joining the muslim government of Andalusia. Do not forget, oh jews, how very alike you all are, across all time! Your collective guilt may well be the heaviest of all. For you are very few, and yet your sins are so very high. The blackest hearts in the world, or at least the people with the most ability to express the blackness in your hearts, belongs to you. And thus, the most introspection, the most care, the most reformation is your burden, your onus, your duty to the world. For the sins of your ancestors in Israel, for the sins of Israel today, for your sins against Europe and Russia, for the sin of the slave trade, for the sin of usury and over-taxing our innocent abused peasantry in Poland, atone, and repent! You owe everyone an apology, a reformation, and a change. From your religion, from the evil ideology of Marxism, from the nonsense of Freud, from your sexual revolution, from your Boazian anthropology, from it all. A clean sweep. Jews, cease being jews! The only way to eradicate your collective guilt, is to end the cursed genetic line that keeps creating these sins. Stop inter-breeding. Join the rest of the world, and diffuse the great evil that lurks in your own, concentrated genes. For the heroic jew who wishes to abolish every part of his culture, from his religion to his politics to his values, and embrace some new healthy alternative, more power to you. But is there any proof your children will be the same? Is there any proof you can even maintain such a change, when your genes all point another direction and desire something quite different? In the end, when a race has so much to answer for, one must question if there's any retrieving them from sin. If the guilt is simply too high to be forgiven. At a time like that, it is time to stop perpetuating such a bloodline -- just like all of Cain's children carried with them the 'mark of Cain,' as well, and were themselves cursed. Jews are good looking enough, rich, smart, and have plenty to offer some gentile or other. For the good of humanity, stop interbreeding and begin a new genome, something cleaner. Without tay-sachs disease, without breast cancer, and without the satanic love of lies your own genes cause. If you don't do it, how long do you think the world will bear it? Toleration of jews has always been a close-run thing, and sooner or later your luck will run out. Somewhere in your hearts, you must realize this. Judaism and the jewish genome are sinking ships. Get out while you can, and save both yourselves, and the gentile world, a river of tears.

Anyone who shares genes with a sinner, is partially that same sinner. Anyone who shares a culture with a sinner, is partially that same sinner. Anyone who refuses to condemn or endorses the sinner, is partially that same sinner. Anyone who contributed to the conditions the sinner reacted to and performed under, is partially that same sinner.

There is such a thing as collective guilt, and all races and peoples and beliefs and religions labor under it. With guilt comes the duty to expiate our guilt, and the only expiation we can give is to understand -- and upon understanding the cause of our sins, to reform them. We are a tribe, and tribes are responsible for all our members. We aren't just the tribe of Newton's and Boswell's. We are also the tribe of Hitler and Nero. Sometimes, the same culture and genes produce both at once. Sometimes even brothers and sisters become the villain and hero of their age!

Those who seek to escape guilt also seek to escape pride. They forsake not just their guilt by renouncing the collective, but they escape any ties of blood, of ancestry, they reject all the efforts of their forebears who gave them the life and fortune they have, they reject their language, their nation, their religion, their songs and stories and history and everything else. They are a pure individual, with no connection to anyone or anything else, no love for anyone, no duty and no obligation to anyone. Amoral, disconnected, nihilists who value nothing but themselves. This is the price one pays to escape the guilt of others -- they must escape also the love of others, the glory of others, the affirmation of others, the wisdom of others -- we must become nothing but ourselves. A tiny, weak bare branch unconnected to any tree. We are a tribe, all of us, all our members. We mourn when they suffer, celebrate when they triumph, and repent when they sin. This is the true nature of solidarity, not some faux 'collectivism' that adopts only winners while rejecting any connection to losers. As though any of us are perfect and descended only from Newton and Gauss, rather than Caligula or Heliogabulus! We are a tribe, and life is as much tragedy as comedy. The rest of the world is also full of tribes, and if they will not answer for their tribes' wrongs, then we must make them answer for them. If they will not clean up their own houses, and reform their own people, then we must do it for them. They are collectively responsible for the actions of their individuals, and thus for every terrorist bombing, we can answer with a nuclear bombing on their capital cities if we please. For every jewish lie, we can round up all jews in America and kick them out. For every black criminal, we can lock up all blacks and tell them to come back when they're civilized a million years from now. Either expiate your guilt collectively, or we will expiate you collectively, because only one thing can be certain -- the only way to stop the random decay of a radiating tribe is not to seek to discover which member will 'explode' next, something not even our finest microscopes have ever predicted while watching a slab of uranium, but to address the entire tribe as an entity with certain properties, whether it's lying, crime, or terrorism, that go off at a predictable rate, regardless of its random location in spacetime, and deal with the tribe accordingly. Collective guilt is the moral solution to tribal conflict. Avoid it, and the only remaining solution is collective reprisals. Who wants to go there? Not me!

The choice is yours.

IQ

There was a good article at vdare.com on this issue:

http://www.ssc.uwo.ca/psychology/faculty/rushtonpdfs/Intelligence%20and%20How%20to%20Get%20It%20(Working%20Paper).pdf

I read through the entire thing. I also read IQ and the Wealth of Nations by Lynn, the Bell Curve by Murray, and Race, Evolution, and Behavior by Rushton. Lynn, Jenson, and Rushton are the premier IQ scientists in the world and once you've read their books, you're pretty much understand the entire field. These scientists are never referred to in the mainstream media however, instead they feature liars and naifs like Diamond, Gould, and Flynn. Usually they're jews, just like their now-deceased leader Boaz. These scum of the earth have been obfuscating for a full century now the most vital truth in the history of mankind: that IQ is genetic, it has a dramatic impact on every facet of human life, and varies between the races.

Here's a rundown on the situation and why this truth is somehow still being suppressed and disbelieved by the public at large. Even though Lynn, Rushton, and Jenson have made plenty good enough arguments for their position, I may as well help out by summarizing their multitude of books into a short essay form.

The first argument of anti-IQers is that IQ doesn't exist. However, everyone can tell the difference between intelligent and stupid people. Just a few minutes in their company and most people can sort out intelligence quite quickly. It's also obvious that humans are smarter than animals, and that some animals are smarter than other animals, and so on. The idea that intelligence is unquantifiable and impossible to compare between people is therefore prima facie false.

The next argument is that IQ tests are flawed and do not measure IQ accurately. Now, this is fair enough. IQ tests are pretty inaccurate taken individually. However just like all statistics, this kind of 'noise' can be accounted for by taking a wide sample. One IQ test on its own is inaccurate, but an IQ test given to 10,000 people, or 10,000,000, will provide a very accurate appraisal of the situation. IQ tests are accurate enough, especially these days, to correctly predict scholastic success, and correlates significantly to wealth, productivity, length of life, criminality, moral behavior (like temperance, fidelity, honor, and non-violence in domestic life), and a high aesthetic sense (like the ability to understand high literature, pursue philosophical questions, enjoy still-life paintings or intricate melodies, and love and appreciation of nature, a finely made work of human craftsmanship, or the beauty of higher math equations 'balancing' or 'making sense.' Also the love of discovery and a wish to learn.)

Over the last few decades IQ tests have been so perfected that we can reduce it down to culture-free reaction-speeds to when a light lights up, or Raven's progressive matrices. We have even reached the point where we can tell the difference between an intelligent and stupid person by just giving a brain scan and looking at their brains directly. Though IQ tests are currently better at establishing someone's IQ than brain scans, MRI's already correlate to IQ by .4 and with better understanding of the brain we could eventually dispense with all tests and thus any chance of error. At that time I wonder what the liars will claim: "My brain wasn't feeling well that day re-scan it?"

Once the antis have admitted IQ exists and IQ tests accurately measure IQ, it's impossible to deny IQ varies between the races. Hundreds of years of testing using huge sample sizes of hundreds of thousands of people have invariably produced the same basic results. Jews > East Asians > Whites > South Asians/Arabs/Amerindians > Blacks. They tend to deny any importance to these IQ numbers however. The general argument is that people who are rich and well educated score highly on IQ tests. They have reversed cause and effect, as in fact those with high IQ then go on to become rich and well educated. However, wealth and education can be given to people, and is thus a source of social engineering, the joy of all liberals. IQ can not be transferred from one person to another, and thus they wish to deny it any factor in causation or value, because they would no longer be able to mold the world.

The problem is their model doesn't work. Jews, for instance, have been extremely poor but in a few years or a couple generations are back to super-rich and super-educated. The same is true of Chinese and whites who came to America with nothing but the shirt on their backs, many times escaping famine and certain death in their homelands. The only people who poverty holds back are the low IQ poor. For everyone else, it's a passing state, for the low IQ, it's their permanent fate. The same with education. High IQ people can certainly be uneducated, but when given the opportunity to learn they'll quickly gain as much knowledge as the next guy. Meanwhile low IQ people, no matter how much education you attempt to drill into them, will fail to learn any of it and eventually drop out of school. This shows the flow of causation liberals so blindly deny.

Give an idiot a world-class harvard education and a million dollars a year, he'll STILL have a low IQ and lead a wretched life. Give a high-IQ person nothing at all and he'll somehow overcome and jump from success to success. At the very least he'll lead a decent life and be the pride of his peers. How is it, then, that liberals say IQ doesn't matter and all anyone needs is money and education? Supposing birth rates were ever controlled in the third world, and supposing science were allowed to increase our productivity to 100 times what it is today (not that hard, as we've already done that compared to our pre-industrial age past), we could willingly perform the liberal experiment and give every single idiot on the planet 50,000 dollars a year and let them live exactly like the middle class, and put them all in super-well-funded schools with every bell and whistle they could desire. It wouldn't matter, they'd trash their own houses, spend it all on bling, drugs, or alcohol, beat each other and cheat on each other, and end up rioting and blaming all their woes on racism.

The next argument the antis trot out, if they admit that IQ is real, the tests are accurate, that it clearly varies between the races, and that it largely accounts for the differences in success these races have in the modern world, is that IQ is determined by nurture and can be equalized between all the races with some program or other. This is the last stand of the antis, you'd think that after this, they would have to admit there's nothing to be done and eugenics, the selective breeding of mankind for higher intelligence, with a corresponding negative pressure on low-IQ people to keep them from breeding, is the only way forward for humanity. This would largely eliminate all the mud races on earth, and with them almost all the problems on earth. So let's try and demolish this next farce of an argument:

"IQ can be raised by children being raised in a good quality home by caring and nurturing parents."

However, this can't be true because black children of rich blacks with 2 parents and a stable home environment still score lower than white children of poor whites with an unstable home environment. A dramatic difference like that simply explodes all possible help 'cultural' factors can provide.

"IQ can be raised by intensive schooling programs like the abecedarian project."

Not really. IQ is plastic during childhood but once people reach adulthood, it narrows back down to its genetic destiny. By age 18 or so, all such programs fail to have any positive affect on people's IQs -- they still score at their racial average and the same as people who never went to such schools. The antis just cite these studies involving children where the brain is still growing and developing according to its genetic template and not finished yet, thus creating fallacious numbers.

"IQ can be raised by good nutrition."

Not really. Even specifically malnourished korean children who were adopted into Belgian/Dutch homes (I forget which) still outscored their peers in school upon adulthood. Furthermore, mixed-race children and black children were both studied in the Minnesota Trans-racial Adoption study, where these children were put into high IQ rich white homes. If genes didn't matter, why did the mixed-race kids score higher on IQ tests than the black kids, both of them raised by white parents??

"People can be taught to increase their IQ scores."

Yes but such increases are not G-loaded and do not correlate to an increased life-competency like G-loaded IQ scores do. The whole point of IQ tests is to get at the truth, teaching to the test only negates the value of the IQ test -- not the value of IQ.

"IQ has been steadily rising every decade, especially among low-IQ groups, thus genes can't possibly be doing this."

These IQ gains are not G-loaded and do not correlate to increased life-competency. The same gap between blacks and whites remains, as does the gap between whites and asians, and asians and jews. The differences between the races aren't going anywhere.

In short, there is no way to raise IQ. Every way suggested only produces an insignificant bump or a temporary increase that goes away again by adulthood.

It is true that the environment can completely determine someone's IQ. If you are never talked to in your life, thrown in a closet, starved and beaten daily, your IQ probably won't be better than a dog's. Or if someone drinks while you're in the womb, shoots up crack, smokes, has you prematurely, then neglects to nurse you, yes you'll probably end up brain dead. However, once you've crossed the first few hurdles into a manageable life -- for instance if you have people to talk to, food on the table, and a primary education -- there's nothing more to be done.

The biggest proof for the ineradicability of IQ differences is not the black-white gap. In fact, it's the jew-white gap. Jews are a full Standard Deviation smarter than whites, 15 points or so. Lamely, liberals argue this is because jews 'study hard.' As though studying has anything to do with IQ (by the way it doesn't, as IQ doesn't measure knowledge, but raw intelligence.) If 'studying hard' were all it took, why don't parents pressure their white children into studying as hard as jews? Why are we such lazy fucktards? Here we have the potential to increase all of our nation's IQ's by 15 points, and correspondingly become as rich and powerful as jews are. We could get all those fancy nobel prizes jews keep getting, become professors and write books like they do, and live like kings while donating billions to our favored causes and political parties like they do. Are we to believe that all we have to do is crack open a few books and study a few more hours a day, and whites could quickly outstrip jews at intellectual prowess and raise our average IQ worldwide from 100 to 115? Everything else between whites and jews is the same. We both have stable home environments, plenty of money, classical music playing in the background, we're both read to as children, we both attend good schools, we both don't have abusive parents or fetal alcohol syndrome. There is no 'anti-white' racism or discrimination hurting our feelings, many 100 IQ whites still live in all white nations without even the possibility of racism being practiced against them. The ONLY difference between whites and jews, environmentally speaking, is jews supposedly study more in school and work harder on their homework.

This minor difference, where Schlomo cracks open a book while Jack goes out to play some catch in the yard, is apparently worth 15 IQ points and is just as important as all the differences between blacks and whites combined. Don't patronize me. Don't make my race out to be fools. We aren't a bunch of lazy fucktards who could, with the flick of our wrists, just 'apply ourselves' and start winning all the chess tournaments, nobel prizes, fields medals and billions of dollars whenever we wanted, but just don't out of spite. We try very hard and study about as much as can possibly avail us. We learn all we can, work as hard as we can, think as much as we can, and treat our children as well as we can. We strive for every advantage and opportunity we can give ourselves, but we still fall short and average out at 100 IQ. To say otherwise is an insult to every white mother and every white father on earth, as though they don't care about their children and intentionally sabotage their IQ by 15 points by dicking around and playing catch with them outside. It's also an insult to every white child on earth, who on top of all the homework and strain they're put under, have to be slapped in the face and told they're lazy because they aren't as smart as jews or east asians. What do you know about those children? How do you know how hard they work? How do you know they didn't spend hours writing that essay, just like the jews do, but still can only write it half as well? Did you ever think of that? Don't you dare blame us for that 15 point gap.

That gap was given to us by God, by evolution in action, and there's nothing any of us can do about it. We have already done everything that is humanly possible to improve our environment, and yet we're still as far away from the jewish top as blacks are from becoming whites. It is like losing a horse race to Secretariat and being told this was because we weren't trying hard during the race.

BULLSHIT. SECRETARIAT WAS FASTER. THAT'S WHY SECRETARIAT WON. END OF STORY.

Furthermore, test after test has shown a correlation between brain size, something we can't possibly affect, and intelligence. Other tests have shown, across hundreds of thousands of samples, that east asians have the largest brains, followed by whites, and that blacks have the smallest brains, well below the rest of us. With such pea-brains, blacks can never be our equals. It's obvious on the face of it. Even if black and white environments were somehow made completely equal, brain size is entirely genetic. ((after all brain size of whites is larger than blacks even as FETUSES before either has been subjected to any environment at all.)) Therefore 40% of IQ is entirely genetic via brain size alone, and brain size can never be equalized, and thus our IQ's will always be higher than theirs. Just like they always have been. This is also just as good a place to point out that men have larger brains (and yes this is all proportional to body size) than women and we generally are 5 IQ points smarter than women. This has also always been the case and the reason men run society and produce all the great accomplishments. It is also why we used such phrases as "don't worry your pretty little head about it." And "women and politics mix like oil and water." The mistake of assuming racial equality between blacks and whites is three times as bad as the mistake of assuming gender equality between women and men (15 points as opposed to 5), but since blacks are only 13% of the US's population and women are 50%, the larger error was giving women the vote, not blacks. But we can deal with that another time, for now suffice to say IQ matters just as much between the sexes as it does between the races, and when IQ science is eventually admitted to be the truth, we will have to tackle the implications in terms of the relationship between the sexes as well as that between the races. Again brain size is impossible to change so there's no way to equalize men and women's IQ either. We are fated with this gap just like we are fated with the gaps between the races. Women need to stop blaming men for their failures and demanding affirmative action to get jobs they don't merit or honors they can't earn. Don't blame us, blame yourselves or God. Everything is due to IQ and the inherent differences in ability completely explain the differences in outcome. Between the races, and between the sexes.

All the science is on our side. The opposition tends to cite isolated studies that are outliers and contradict the massive numbers of studies that point the other way. This is bad science. They then trumpet their one study that shows whatever they want to believe and prove either that environment is 100% of IQ, or that the question needs 'more study' and 'more debate', thus playing a stalling game until it is too late for whites to learn the truth. If these phony scientists, by cherry picking and distorting numbers to keep giving 'vague' and 'it's still in the air we need more time' results, can simply stop us from learning the truth for another 100 years, it won't matter anymore. Because by then, whites will all be dead and their goal will be achieved. We cannot wait until we have 100% satisfactory proof where we know every single detail about intelligence possible. By then, immigration and high birth rates will have replaced the entire white western world with 3rd world mud people and the world will have fallen into a dark age. We've already researched this issue for a century, the science is already in (just like evolution, and yet creationists continuously demand more and more evidence as though another 200 years will be necessary to figure out the truth of the matter.) What we need to do now is not more and more scientific studies on IQ, what we need to do is apply what we already know. We need to stop immigration, implement eugenics, abolish affirmative action, rewrite our history books to reflect the truth, increase the white birth rate, kick out all our minorities or retreat from them all and secede, while we still can. We can continue our IQ research safely from a white nationalist haven, with as much leisurely debate as we please from there. But as things stand, the information will be entirely useless to us, by the time everyone will 'agree' with it. I see far too many sites like Gates of Vienna arguing 'we just don't know whether genes or environment cause IQ, we must wait patiently until all the science is in and meanwhile we are going to accept as a working premise that it is environment and base our philosophy and politics off of that.' You can bet 300 years from now Gates of Vienna still 'won't be sure' if it's genes or environment, and 'to be on the safe side' will base all their thinking on the environmental side, while calling anyone else a Nazi who has long ago realized it's genes. This type of conservatism isn't any different from liberalism. They are simply cowards unwilling to face the truth, just like creationists, and their intellectual cowardice translates to a political cowardice, a complete paralysis that makes them incapable of any positive change. Like I keep saying, what we need is fanaticism, fanaticism, fanaticism. A few people can change the world. A fanatical few, who are neither intellectual nor moral cowards, can cause more real change than an endless mass of vacillators and self-deceivers. God I wish I could somehow flush all of them down some toilet where they belong. I have no use for moderates when the world is going up in flames as we speak! Vdare.com, Davidduke.com, the Occidental Observer and a few others 'get it.' As for the rest, they never will.

Nothing is ever simple, and often high IQ people are the larger forces for evil than low IQ. For instance, high IQ people have killed more whites than low IQ people -- when the jews took over and destroyed Russia, they killed tens of millions of whites, moreso than any amount of drunk driver Mexicans or black home invaders. High IQ people have also become selfish and cruel like the french aristocracy pre-french-revolution, causing famines among their own people by stealing all the wealth for themselves. High IQ people have also encouraged low-IQ immigration into our countries and are the chief financiers and propagandists for the genocide of the white race. From this point of view, it's a little senseless to be so harsh on dumb people while praising high IQ as the end-all be-all. However, there is a difference. Whereas high intelligence can be good or evil, depending on how it is used, low intelligence can only be evil. Dumb people are simply worthless trash, they can never lead a good life or be any use to the world. They lead wretched lives, leech off of others, abandon their children and rape innocent women. There are reasons to live around other smart people, or even people smarter than ourselves. There is no reason to live around dumb people. They are a purely negative force on this earth. While the relationship between IQ and the Good can be debated, the solution to dumb people is clear cut. As Queen Amedala said: Our people are dying Chancellor, we must do something quickly.

Hope from the BNP?

Whenever I want a political 'pick-me-up' I click on http://bnp.org.uk/ .

Every day the good news keeps streaming in. "Unprecedented interest in the BNP." "More members joining the BNP every day." I see one of the busiest websites in the world at the locus of a truly organized, funded, and grassroots activized nationalist party. To make it that much sweeter, the leaders of the BNP are not stooges and are some of the brightest thinkers in the white nationalist movement, like Arthur Kemp.

It's pretty clear the BNP, in the interest of respectability, is pulling its punches. For instance at one time the leader of the party Nick Griffen was willing to go on the record denying the Holocaust (TM), but now says he is certain it happened and that he loves jews with an undying fervor. It doesn't matter. If the BNP's platform were actually implemented, it would be a miracle and the salvation of Britain. Not only do they intend to block all further immigration, they are going to repatriate as many muslims as they can. They will deport criminals, block all welfare to asylum seekers, and pay recent immigrants to leave. Instead of the UK turning into a majority mud nation with one of the highest crime and tax rates in the world, it will be one of the only stable, healthy, and prosperous nations on earth as the century proceeds.

But can it really work? A democratic election where people suddenly wake up, do a 180 degree turn, decide homogeneity is better than diversity and racism isn't truly wrong, and vote in the BNP for the new prime minister?

I can't imagine this as being possible. The numbers are against all democratic successes. Around 300,000 british people leave the UK every year because they are sick of the immigrants who are moving in. These people form the natural constituency of the BNP, and yet they have all mostly left England to its fate. Smart individually, but in the long run it means racists will never stand and fight because there's always a greener shore. Meanwhile millions of non-whites who would never vote BNP are moving in to replace them. How many more years until a BNP success is physically impossible due to demographics? Furthermore, will whites educated in public schools to hate themselves and love diversity really vote BNP? Liberalism has been in control of our schools for 40 years at least now, will anyone under the age of 40 vote BNP?? In America most young people voted for Obama, they had been properly brainwashed and the results were predictable. Why should England be any different?

There are other problems, like Tories and UKIP who attempt to hijack BNP immigration policies without any intention of actually doing anything about it. Even labor says stuff like 'no more immigration' and 'british jobs for british workers.' When everyone parrots the BNP line but only the BNP means it, it's easy for voters to be deceived and split their vote into inefficacy.

Due to the cordon sanitairre, the BNP would have to win 51% of the total vote to form a government. Practically no party can ever hope for that kind of popularity, and yet, since no other party will form a coalition with the BNP, it's easy for the BNP to rack up the plurality of the votes on election day and yet have no political power and no government position in parliament afterwards. The same happens to Vlaams Belang over and over again in Belgium, though they are the most popular party in the country. How can anyone overcome this hurdle? It's democracy turned on its head, when the largest party has the least power in government, and yet that's how Europe works.

The press, of course, is virulently anti-BNP and I can't imagine how anyone can survive that much negative press. Furthermore, it may be too late for the BNP to do anything. The people are demoralized drunkards, just like in Russia. The banking sector which formed the majority of England's wealth has vanished, unemployment is high, and somehow the BNP would be held to task for undoing all the damage the other parties did -- while being sniped at the entire time by a negative press. Who could manage such a feat? I'd much rather form an independent new nation without any debt, with moralized hand-picked people, and a press under our own control, then try to salvage some old nation mired in its own depravity. Do we even want a country like England back? Sometimes I'd rather countries like England, or states like California, would just be wiped clean by giant tsunamis and be done with it. Why should white nationalists like the BNP have to save the general public's sorry asses, who caused this mess? I'd rather we only saved ourselves -- everyone else would only drag us down and hold us back.

So politically I doubt the BNP can ever win. The conservative vote, like usual, will be split and rendered moot by a cordon sanitairre. The press will lie and smear people until everyone is too afraid to vote BNP. If they ever do succeed, just you watch the votes will be tampered with, or a court will declare the party illegal and disband it, like they did to Vlaams Blok. There is no justice in democracy. The whole thing is rigged and the election will NEVER, EVER go to a nationalist party no matter how popular they are.

But the BNP is doing something else, that is just as inspiring and hopeful, and that is, it's ORGANIZING A POLITICAL MOVEMENT OF, BY, AND FOR WHITE PEOPLE. This is an unbelievable event in America, that's just voted in a mulatto for our president. Across the atlantic, thousands, maybe millions of people will be going to the poll and voting for a white nationalist government, a white nationalist platform that not only rejects immigration and multiculturalism, but is intent on taking back all its historic soil and kicking out all foreigners!!! O.O. Can you imagine? Where is the American party offering such a platform? Where are its activists, leafletters, campaign contributors, campaign rallies, and so on? The BNP has them all, they are constantly buzzing like a healthy bee hive, the air of life is around them. People are passionate and believe they can actually make a difference, meeting people of like minds and publically standing up for their beliefs without apology, retreat or surrender. :). This type of organization is the locus of a later movement, yet more radical (as it will have to be as each passing year goes by), and an environment that insulates children of those families from outside peer pressure. Instead of being 'alone and despised' BNP children can be around other BNP children and made to feel natural, normal, loved and honored for the opinions they and their parents hold. All it would take is for these BNP campaigners to as a first step move to a single place in England and start voting in their local elections pure BNP councillors, mayors, etc. You can bet immigrants and criminals would steer clear of the areas, white history would be taught in the schools, I really can't imagine how good life would be if you could leave your home and see only white people who share your views in the streets, parks, libraries, government office, juries, and malls. The BNP can do it, because it has encouraged people to become identifiable white nationalists, and to organize politically. The sky is the limit for the BNP. If they never win an election, it won't matter, because they will have formed a permanent center for racists to orbit around, and in this manner self-sort, segregate, and start their independent lives as white-nationalist state within a state. If it prospers, more whites will seek to move into it and will add to its strength, and if the rest of the country falls apart (as its bound to do) the push factor will add to the pull factor and send yet more whites in the welcoming arms of the BNP counties. After that it wouldn't take long for the BNP to declare independence from an economically and socially ruined state, or to declare martial law and impose order on the remainder of the country, and so on. So long as the BNP remains politically organized and in communication with each other, and so long as they self-segregate into a solid portion of England's soil, it will be impossible to dislodge them. Just like how Lithuania eventually escaped from Soviet control, 'BNP-land' can exist within the UK's control indefinitely until the UK, like the USSR, finally collapses and lets them free.

Can it happen? You bet it can. There are millions of white nationalists currently actively donating and campaigning for the BNP. This is thrilling stuff, and the start of nations. What we're witnessing is the self-discovery of the ego. Suddenly, Englishmen from across the nation are discovering that they ARE. They exist, are a people, are manifold, strong, and connected. That they don't have to take this lying down, and that politics are an option for them to retake what is theirs, as well as defend what they still have.

My only fear is that some worthless Sarkozy-like rightest Tory will steal the BNP's thunder and make life somewhat manageable through some half-assed compromise. If that happens, and people trickle out of the BNP like peasants going back out of a fortified town to resume farming, I fear for them. Sarkozy did nothing to save France, all it did is put a new face on the same old genocide. He talked the talk but didn't walk the walk. The same will be done if any other party takes power, and yet, it might fool BNP members (especially new members who are merely reacting to current events instead of true believers) into lowering their guards and disintegrating as a group identity once more. I also fear the BNP, being human, will be found to have psychos, criminals, liars and other such machiavellians at the top of their party, and that it might discredit the cause as a whole. What people must understand is the cause is bigger than any personality and hold firm to their convictions. Leaving the party in disgust because someone or other is found out to be a criminal is a horrible treachery to your people and your children. We need the BNP if we are going to save even a piece of Britain for the white race, and western civilization. So whatever happens to it, stay in it and endure. The BNP must survive, it's the only party out there that can unite whites as a group, to get whites to begin thinking of themselves as a tribe, with their own interests they must protect. So keep on campaigning in the sham elections, and keep on voting BNP even if you lose every election and never get a single member of parliament, nevermind run parliament.

The BNP is not, really, a democratic path to salvation. It is a messenger, it is a vehicle, using the fireworks and pomp of an election, to continue pushing the message of white nationalism into every home, every 4 years or so we are given another chance to attract everyone we can into our bosom and change their lives forever. Keep the election fervor coming, keep distributing leaflets that say 'VOTE BNP JUNE 4th', but really mean "LIVE WHITE NATIONALISM EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR."

Now that's someting to be excited about.

For all those worried about the lack of success in the WN movement, listen to this song, lie back, and think of England:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5h4PFBuzvw&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fdailyreferendum.blogspot.com%2F2007%2F02%2Fsong-for-england-roots-by-show-of-hands.html&feature=player_embedded

Are elites to blame?

I had an interesting conversation with someone, in which he posits the problem is not jews, but rather, all high IQ people in general. This simply includes a higher proportion of jews because they have higher IQs.

Now, this doesn't exculpate jews, as that still means they are the leadership of the forces of darkness. But what it does do, is try to understand the world from a larger frame of reference and thus understand more clearly the truth of our modern political world. So let's go with this theory. What if the issue is not the particular racist wishes of the jews to undermine their hated rivals the aryans, but a concerted desire of all elites towards their own elitist welfare, which just so happens to not have any connection to the interests and welfare of the hoi-poloi of lesser IQ?

After all, do the elites really want competition from an upwardly mobile middle class nipping at their heels? Maybe it would be better to eliminate the middle class, and replace it with only an underclass, returning to the stratified model of Feudalism or 1700's industrialism. In that case, elites would hardly desire eugenics, as that would eliminate their advantage over the competition. Instead they would want dysgenics, so that their competition steadily recedes away and returns to serfdom.

Do high IQ people want other high IQ people to be the norm? How would they get all their laundry done? Who would clean their homes and provide daycare for their kids? For a high IQ person, what do they benefit from more, uppity middle class workers demanding high wages and safe working conditions, or a sludge of mud colored races willing to work for nothing and die in droves?

Since the elites will always be rich, they can safely assume that whatever drawbacks of diversity and a low IQ population can be avoided. Sitting safely in some sort of feudal era castle, with security guards and fences, the woes of the working class can all occur safely outside their own life experiences. Crime? Well, so what, it doesn't affect me. Unemployment? Not an issue, my high IQ is so rare there's never competition for MY job. Poverty? Impossible, so long as there's any money left at all in this continent, it will largely be in our hands. It's not like black dictators in Africa are poor, despite the poverty of their nation as a whole. This will be all the more true for elites of diversity-lands in the coming west. They will not be attacked by criminals, unemployed, or poor no matter how far you extend the timeline. Not even if they are just 1% of the population, they'll still be wealthy and well off and secure behind some sort of gated community.

In short, there is no personal drawback to America, or Europe becoming 99% mud for the elites. They will continue to dominate, or become even richer and more powerful than they are today. Sure they might lose political power, but their financial power will more than make up for it. They will bribe the politicians to support them, or threaten a financial collapse if government disturbs their plutocracy, and the poor will back down. The only fear elites might hold is that someday an irrational hatred of the elites might provoke a mass slaughter of the nation's most productive class just out of spite. This is, of course, why jews worked so hard to secure the bolthole that is Israel. "Never Again!" Never again, after elites destroy the middle class and lay ruin to their host nation, will they not have a bolthole to escape to when the going gets too hot to stay there any longer. If the heat does get too high for the elites, expect a bunch of private jets flying out of there with their cash and winnings in hand, the purchase of a new mansion elsewhere, and life 'getting along as normal' despite the annoying disruption. Do elite whites have such a bolthole set up? Perhaps the bahamas, or costa rica will suffice for now. I'm sure something can be arranged when the time of mass uprisings ala haiti approaches. For now, that's hundreds of years down the pipeline and not a priority.

The problem with these elites is they feel absolutely nothing for the rest of the nation. If the rest of the nation is impoverished, beset upon by violent criminals, or unemployed, it doesn't matter to them in the slightest. The lower world never reaches their airy heights of comfort and luxury. If the rest of the country has soaring divorce rates, illegitimate children, substance abuse problems and listens to rap music, what do they care? They still marry for life, have children in a happy home, listen to classical music and refrain from drugs and alcohol. What does it matter to them that laws could be constructed to improve the living standards of the masses? They already have all those benefits without those laws, and anything that undermines their competition is just a net plus for themselves.

This is not new, from China to Europe nobility have commonly ignored the plight of the common man to such an extent that millions died off regularly from famine and disease. Hardly any peasant stock even survives, genetically, in the white genome. Life was so incredibly tough that only the privileged nobility could regularly pass on their genes from generation to generation. Samurai in Japan cared so little for the peasantry they would regularly walk up and kill one just to test out their new swords, and the Spartans were notorious for their treatment of the helots. From whence does this utter lack of empathy for the lower classes arise? Partially it is knowledge of the innate superiority of the nobility (we are like an entirely different species from those untermenschen, smarter, more virtuous, better looking and healthier than they could ever hope to be), and partially a fear of losing their always precarious hold on power, as a small minority of the population lording over a much greater mass of servants. Only utter ruthlessness can keep them down, and they deserve to be kept down ruthlessly because they suck anyway, just look at their dirty, vulgar, and brutish lives without refinement of any kind.

The high IQ elites, which are almost half jews in America, makes it look like a jewish problem, but even without jews the exact same dynamic would play out. Whether it's greek, japanese, chinese, Indian rajahs or European Barons, the peasants always get fucked in the end. The question shouldn't really be, why are the elites selling us out and dooming our nation to irretrievable suffering and destruction? The question should really be, "What miracle preserved a middle class for so long? How could such an unnatural general equality and prosperity have ever emerged?"

I would like to think the enlightenment contributed to this miracle of elites actually caring about the commoners and promoting their welfare into a stable middle class. Such passionate reformers as Rousseau, Voltaire, Hume, Russell, Charles Dickens and Leo Tolstoy all worked diligently to show other smart, rich people how cruel their manner of life was and how truly good the commoners they ruled were. After breaking down the ruthlessness of the rich towards the poor, the poor soon emerged as a political force to be reckoned with and managed many critical reforms that ensured their place in the middle class: Labor laws, housing laws, the banning of slavery and serfdom, free public education for all, free health care for all, a minimum wage and democracy itself were all attempts to rein in the rich elites and give a voice to the common folk that would allow them an independent standard of living the rich could no longer take away. It didn't take long, however, for these institutions to be infiltrated, corrupted, and returned to the control of the rich. After all, the elites have the higher IQ, and thus in any competition over time they will win. No matter what system is used or what laws are passed to help out the middle class and commoners, the rich will eventually gain power and corrupt them to serve their own ends. Thus, at the very moment laws were being passed that would ensure a high standard of living for the middle class, the rich were finding ways to get around them.

No more slavery? I guess we'll just use illegal immigrant labor then. Democracy? I guess we'll import an electorate that will vote for us then. Labor laws? Minimum wage? Free education for all? Well then, we just need to do our work off the books, or inflate the currency to the point that the minimum wage is a joke, or dumb down the public schools so that only private school children have any chance at success in life. There is no law the elites cannot get around or gimmick in their favor, simply because they are smart and rich and we aren't. The only real protection of the common folk was the moral sense the Enlightenment gave the elites to genuinely care for us and want us to prosper alongside themselves.

No one who reads the greats of the enlightenment, especially Charles Dickens, can go away feeling nothing for their fellow man. The old practices of letting starvation and disease cart away millions of their compatriots, of trying out swords on innocent bystanders to see how sharp they are, or of stacking 100 women into a room with no windows or ventilation and watching them all die helplessly in a fire, CANNOT exist in elites who are educated towards a certain moral sense of love for humanity and compassion for its weaker members. Steinbeck's accounts of the great depression should make even the most cold-hearted flint-fisted capitalist wonder why, when fellow americans were starving, people were destroying their own potato crops and guarding against vagrants hoping to forage DISCARDED FOOD. Classical liberalism has a weakness though, in that it relies on culture to be the conscience of the rich. When culture becomes depraved or nihilist, when the compassion of Christianity is replaced with a vague hedonism, authors such as Solzhenitsyn and Dostoeveskey who formed the conscious and good will towards the people at large are no longer heard. They may well be diligently writing away every day, but if they aren't published and advertised and read, their effect is diluted and ultimately stymied. The Enlightenment has to occur every generation, every single generation of the elites must read and watch new art, new music, new culture that encourages a certain softness and love inside them for their fellow man. Such a precarious requirement for truly great artists to be around, as a sort of priestly class, for the elites to confess to and learn from, is bound to collapse sooner or later as one generation drops the ball -- either a particularly coarse and hardened audience, or a particularly mediocre and unconvincing culture.

One of the strongest counters to elitist scorn for the common folk is racial solidarity. When people love their race as a whole, from top to bottom, or even their nation as a whole "we poles," "we englishmen" etc, the class divides disappear. With such a mindset, elites do not watch the commoners waste away while drinking wine and discussing the next horse races, or make ridiculous statements like "let them eat cake." Instead, they do everything in their power to save their 'brothers,' people of their own race who carry the same unique worth as they themselves have. Hitler was not from any elite heritage, and lived penniless and starving on the streets, fought on the front lines of WWI and was gassed in defense of his country. While the nobility ignored the plight of the poor, or sent them into hopeless meatgrinders like WWI, Hitler offered another way: Racial solidarity, the end of the class divide, and an equal concern for all members of the german folk. While the elites ignored the damage of the depression on the common german people, Hitler in just a few years turned everything around. By simply caring for germans because they were germans, he found a place for them all in the economy. Inflation ended, employment sprouted up, roads were built, resources retrieved from foreign occupation, versailles payments ended, and so on. The moment someone who actually cared about his people took power, the well-being of the common folk skyrocketed to giddy levels no other country could match. Racial and ethnic solidarity however had a drawback, in that they created tension and hate between members outside of the race, even as they got rid of the class divides. Ultimately Germany was consumed with a 'racism gone wild' and the resulting backlash, making them worse off than when they'd even started.

Another answer to elitist feudalism was Marx's communism. Having read Das Kapital, I believe Karl Marx genuinely meant well with his theories. Observing the utterly cruel conditions feudalism and industrial capitalism was imposing on the british people (much like his contemporary charles dickens was doing) Marx wrote in an optimistic way about how much better things would be if the elites were dethroned and money were shared evenly between everyone. This policy doesn't even work for a little while, like classical liberalism or racism, it simply falls flat immediately. Starting with the slaughter of the very elites necessary for human accomplishment and high productivity, it then muddles around in an anti-human fog of lies and violence trying to keep people from pursuing their own self interest for the sake of strangers. There is a difference between charity, the freely given love of man to his fellow man, and forcible confiscation and slavery. Communism may have the same goal as classical liberalism, but its approach is evil and spoils any hope of reaching said goal. After the loss of a hundred million people to this belief in the 20th century, we can declare it dead on arrival.

Religion has also traditionally spoken up for the poor, huddled masses. however, I have to say it has done so little to actually benefit them, that we can ignore all ancient religions as hopelessly ineffectual. In fact, religion was often used not to moderate the power and scorn elites had for their commoners, but to buttress up and secure the rule and station of the elites. The elites had the 'mandate of heaven' to go on abusing the peasantry, apparently. For thousands of years, Christians, Buddhists, and Muslims never questioned the right for their elites to hold them in serfdom, slavery, illiteracy, or keep power through a hereditary system with no upward mobility. If religion is going to moderate the avarice and ruthlessness of the nobility, it certainly hasn't been invented yet. And in our growingly skeptical world, it is unlikely a new religion can emerge or gain any adherents.

So where do we stand? We must either reclaim the culture, or rally around our race, to abolish the genocidal campaign our own elites are waging against us. Either through negligence, or an active desire to keep us down or abolish us as the greatest threat to their continued rule and wealth. I believe both are necessary. Neither one worked in isolation, and as is the case in AIDS treatments, cocktail combos are always more effective. In fact, for all we know a dash of Marxism and a dollop of Christianity could also be helpful, even though they both failed utterly on their own. But abolishing the culture of nihilism that prevails today and returning to a classical liberal love for humanity and the Good, and the teaching of this in all our media and our classrooms is absolutely necessary. Alongside that, we must rally around our race if we hope to protect the middle class, because the majority of all other races are innately underclass, untermenschen, and no decent society can be composed of them. We must remind elites that their ultimate duty is not to themselves or their children, but their genome as a whole, as expressed through the white people all around them. That we all have a share of greatness in us, and that great people can emerge from the most rustic back-alleys of the world when allowed a fair chance in life. That moreover, the elites are only slightly superior to other members of their race, that the wheel of fortune turns and someday their descendants will be worse than our descendants, and that in any event we should not be treated like rats to be thrown into hopeless wars like World War I, or left to the ravages of small pox even as they vaccine their children with the cure.

Combining racial solidarity with a eugenics movement will also remove the excuses of the elites: "what on earth do we have in common with white trash? We are intelligent, we are superior, we are completely different species than you." Oh really? Every person on earth has millions of different combinations of genes they can give their children. If we give every child the absolute best combination possible, how much inferior would our children be to your children? Is the gap really so vast? As science improves, these sorts of excuses are not just mean-spirited, they are an active attempt to suppress competition. By preventing eugenics, sure they can keep their 'separateness' alive. But what kind of excuse is that? "We're better than you, because we've actively made you all worse than ourselves." Well gee, that's a good reason to keep elites in power or reward them with great prestige and wealth!

I propose authors like Dickens, Steinbeck, Solzhenitsyn, Tolstoy, Dostoevesky, Hume, Rousseau, and Voltaire (especially Candide!) become the curriculum of our schools. I want the children of our elites crying their eyes out in sympathy with the unfortunate lower classes of the world. I want them to fall in love with characters from not-so-grand stations trying their best in a hopelessly muddled world. The tightest bond we can ever form between the classes is sympathy. Racism promotes sympathy between fellow members, as does classical liberalism. Heightening the genetic worth and carefully quarantining off genetically deficient members also creates greater equality in a country, which inevitably creates greater sympathy between the elites and the masses. Giving all members of our community the most opportunity we can will also help erase the class divides. Things like required virtue in personal life will help erase the gaps between the elites and the poor. Poor people bring about their own disasters through stupid mistakes: they divorce, have children out of wedlock they can't support, drink, do drugs, do crime, and otherwise sabotage their own lives. They can't help it, they lack the intelligence, foresight, and self control elites have over themselves. But we can help them. By banning them from making mistakes and stopping them from self-sabotage at every turn, it will be AS THOUGH these nincompoops were just as honest, rational, intelligent and temperate as the best of us. We can equalize moral behavior through legislated morality -- without it the class divide can never be bridged. We must also provide free health care and education, of the highest quality possible, for all children, so that they do not have some crippling childhood handicap that will perpetuate the class divide the rest of their lives.

I promise you, if the common folk live an honest life without crime, get a decent education at least through high school, marry young and don't divorce, if they don't drink or have children out of wedlock or use drugs, they will thrive and prosper. They will be a MIDDLE class. The miracle of a middle class can be constructed, through moral, cultural, legal, and taxation levers. If elites are given a stake in the nurturing of the middle class, through art and the promotion of love and charity, through the higher productivity of their workers, and through a love of their race and common shared biology and history with the people around them -- they can be recruited into the movement instead of the direst threat to the movement.

However, if jews are simply acting as jews, rather than as elites, they will never feel sympathy for us whites. That is why a solution such as the above will never work so long as one race is the elite, and another the common folk. Jews must become white through interbreeding, or be thrown off entirely. There can be no sympathy between such alien parts as jews and aryans. Elite whites are different. They can be softened, their hearts turned to mush, for little Oliver Twist or Pip. Jews are pitiless towards whites and have always been hired as tax collectors or pimps or usurers for their very ruthlessness towards the general populace. Such a pitiless elite will never promote equality, and to make things worse, they will never wish to lose power for fear of an 'anti-semitic' backlash. As in, for fear of racism, they will be racist towards others in perpetuum. What an unsolvable riddle that poses! Even if we treat them with the utmost love and affection, their paranoia against anti-semitism will continue to strike out against all whites for eternity. Therefore there is no amount of appeasement we can give jewish elites. The solution is to wipe them out, either through interbreeding until there is no jewish people, or mass deportations to Israel so that they never trouble us again.

How do we get from here to there? Elites will certainly not support these policies, nor will the underclass untermenschen who are too incompetent to do anything and aren't white anyway. It has to come from elites who don't care about themselves. Billionaires who have always loved the white race, or the middle class, or family values or a decent 1950's culture we see from the Norman Rockwell paintings. High IQ strategists who sacrifice their lives for the cause and support not their peers, but their employees. And alongside them must be joined the power of the remaining middle class. People who have their own lives in order must stop sabotaging themselves with the underclass designed to replace them. They must reject the nihilist culture which has betrayed them. And once the middle class has recognized its own interests and where it conflicts with the elites and the underclass, they must unite under their own political party and vote accordingly. Or if voting is no use, they must FIGHT. The middle class will certainly be where all the best soldiers reside. The interests of the white middle class must be combined. Those in danger of falling into the lower class must get their lives together and refrain from sin and self-sabotage. Those in the upper middle class must remember their roots and have compassion and sympathy for the people around them. Everyone must communicate effectively with the elites that we don't seek to displace or destroy them like the Marxists, we simply desire to defang them. To end their poisonous influence on us, the white middle class. We even hope to someday join them through the biological uplifting of our children, and we're more than happy to let them run this new era, just so long as they sympathize with us! Just so long as they care! Not so long ago, it was the role of every english lady to distribute charity to the poor in her realm, to upkeep her servants to high standards and to provide a moral example to her followers at Church, and in godliness. It is not impossible for elites to love their people, or support them, or care for them. It just requires the right tone and the right mix of superiors and slightly inferiors, instead of drastically hopeless inferiors. I love the elites of the earth, they have done almost everything important and often have the greatest virtues you could ask for. Socrates didn't just invent the socratic method of argument, he also stood up for his beliefs and drank poison rather than leave his beloved Athens. This is typical of our elites, who are great in all things both intellectual and spiritual. But I also love the people, who if cultivated, can be just as good. And furthermore, a society of pure elites is impossible (there will always be better and worse, even among people competing at the olympics), so the people will always be with us.

The 'people' have also done things we can take pride in. They settled America with a can-do pioneer spirit, amidst incredible hardship and danger. The people fought bravely in war after war for their country. The people have participated widely in wonderful cultural displays like literature, music, dance, christmas trees and religious solemnity. Without any elites at all, the people would get by. Without the people, elites are Archimedes without a lever -- no way left to move the world with the power of their ideas. The people are the audience with the ability to understand the story -- even if the elites are the only story-tellers. What is the use of art that can never be communicated? The wider the audience, the more hearts it touches and minds it inspires, the greater the maker of the art. The greatness of our elites, therefore, depends entirely on the soul of his people. Entirely! There cannot be one without the other. There is so much beauty in every white face and every loving family and every honest plainspoken man, that the people are intrinsically valuable in and of themselves. Even if we never split another atom or sent another ship into space, these common, middle class people would still be playing fiddles and kicking up their heels in synchrony, and laughing and crying and hugging and making love come nightfall. I could never disown the people or scorn them like so many elites do. There is gold waiting to be mined in all of them, and when they go wrong, we should say like Jesus: "forgive them, for they know not what they do." It is no justification for destroying them like the current order intends.

A new party must be formed for American politics. This party will represent the interests of the white middle class. It will not be averse to taxing the rich and giving itself legs up in the world through subsidized health care, college tuition, job placement programs, minimum wage laws, etc. It will not be averse to tackling social mores like divorce, promiscuity, substance abuse, corruption in the media or homosexuality. It will oppose immigration and miscegenation, and ultimately demand complete territorial separation from all untermenschen, who compete directly for their jobs and wages, prey upon their daughters sexually, rape and murder, steal and affirmative action their way to the front of all lines. The middle class is still, thank God, the majority of all Americans. They could at any time, still, unite for the sake of their own interests. Before the elites completely eradicate them with the new mud sludge republic of Elitism, before the muds genocide them and take all their jobs and houses by stacking up 8 to a room and working for 8 cents an hour. All it takes is a realization of what's truly been happening in this world, and how they have been betrayed by their 'leaders' into policies that directly go against their self-interest. It will also take the removal of the jews, as the most inveterate enemies of any such change. It could still be achieved politically and peacefully, under the current democratic system. But if that doesn't suffice, the middle class forms the majority of all gun owners in this country and the majority of the military. There will still be a way to take back what's ours. Again, all it takes is for the white middle class to realize what's been done to it. To realize its own interests and how they are not being served by the current elite. What will it take for them to wake up? The current financial crisis doesn't seem to be enough. The current crime levels aren't enough. The current 50% illegitimacy rate isn't enough. What will be enough? Lord knows. Maybe nothing. But maybe ten more years of continual decline will be enough. Who knows? It's in God's hands. But so long as it's possible, we should keep trying. What have we got to lose? A fate worse than extinction?