It should be clear to anyone that most of what they were ever taught in school, at church, and in the media was all lies. Unfortunately, people do not learn from discovering one lie, the meta-realization that there must be other lies they have been taught that they have yet to uncover. They do not use their critical thinking skills on all their beliefs, but selectively challenge one or another belief they find incredible, leaving the rest of the edifice, and thus the structural integrity of the building, intact. This permits the most ludicrous juxtapositions of thought, for instance creationists who believe in racial differences. Or evolutionists who believe in egalitarianism. At a certain point in someone's life, they must leave everything they were ever taught behind them. They must review everything they know, look at all sides of every issue, and determine objectively where the truth really lies. People who have discovered one or two deceits of the modern world and pride themselves on their enlightenment, are woefully ignorant puppets still dancing to the strings of their rulers. Like the 13 circles of hell, climbing out of a single one may make your life somewhat more tolerable than before, but it hardly means you are in Purgatory, much less Heaven. Dante did not end his journey at the first circle or the first heavenly sphere, sit down, and decide he'd seen enough. He sojourned across the entirety of the inferno and paradise, with his trusty guides Virgil and Beatrice constantly encouraging him to move forwards and not lose heart or grow complacent with the sphere he was in.
The lies that rule the world can probably be graded in this order of strength. Each and every one of them is capable of destroying the world, independent of the rest. Together, they become an unstoppable juggernaut that enslaves everyone in its path. If no man stands up for the Truth, if no movement dedicates itself not to one lie or another, but to the pursuit of truth and a willingness to follow it wherever it might lead, we are literally facing the end of the world. I wish I knew what lay in the hearts of East Asians. Do they really buy into any of these lies? Do they mouth it simply because they'd rather get along than dispute the issues? Do they let sleeping dogs lie because, after all, it doesn't hurt them but only their competitors around the world? If I could ever have a frank discussion with Japanese, Chinese, South Koreans, and the intelligent cadres of India, it would be fascinating to see how free or ensnared they are to these world-devouring lies. It is my pessimistic opinion, however, that they are as fooled and deluded as the rest of us, and mere chance has spared them up until this point. Sooner or later, the same lies will take root in their lands, and corrupt their societies into oblivion as well. Relying on the East to succeed where we have failed is fanciful, it isn't a solution, it is simply a surrender. These lies must be struck down, and it must be us, the same people who invented the Scientific Method, produced the Renaissance and discovered the Enlightenment who strikes them. We are the best, if we fail, there is no evidence anyone else could succeed. This is the battleground for the soul of the world. The day has come, we cannot afford to retreat any further.
#1. 'The Abrahamic faiths. Anyone who believes in Judaism or its spinoffs -- Christianity, Islam, Mormonism, Bha'i, Sikhs, etc, etc.'
This is a big lie. It's obvious that God, if he exists in any sense of the word, would not have the particular personality and characteristics and goals as the ones described in these holy books. That God would not speak in such an ignorant manner, neglecting science and logic as though He were just as dumb as the followers of his day. That God would not lie, or say contradictory or paradoxical things, demand or condone evil, design the world to act/be opposite to his own wishes, and so on. These ridiculous personal Gods that reflect the personality of their makers but not of the Maker, are mere stories that lead us away from the truth in front of our eyes. By demanding we suspend our reason, God steals our humanity from us and leaves us as ignoble sheep, readily led by the most vicious and worthless wolves amongst us. The great harm religion has done us and still does to us cannot be easily contained: The Old Testament begins with the glorification of genocide, the slaughter of all the innocent firstborn of Egypt and all the Palestinians who were in Jews' way. It supports polygamy, slavery, deceit, child sacrifice, and proposes the most ludicrous miracles that create an anti-scientific bent of mind fixated on illusions instead of observable reality. Sometimes the sun sits still in the sky for hours, other times the whole world is flooded and only 2 of every species survives, all of which fit in a boat. Christianity does little better by first sanctioning and thus repeating everything wrong in the Old Testament, then creating a Heaven and Hell where justice is done and Faith is rewarded, thus relegating people's actual lives to a mere footnote of their existence. By devaluing their earthly existence, Christians are led into ridiculously irrational choices like chastity, pacifism, charity to their own enemies, the 'brotherhood of man in Christ' and whatever else is said to get them out of Hell and into Heaven.
Following them up comes Islam, which calls for the slaughter or enslavement of anyone who does not obey the one true God of Abraham. Clearly learning from both previous religions, the warlike master race messiahdom of the jews and the heaven and hell martyrdom system of Christianity creates a new hybrid monster: jihad. Ever since its beginning in 600 AD, it has been aggressively attacking all of its neighbors, destroying their temples, banning all intellectual investigations, slaughtering hundreds of millions, enslaving and castrating tens of millions more, and all in the name of God with a holy book to back them up. This ruthless tribe numbers over a billion and even wields nuclear weapons. So long as the delusion continues, it represents a mortal threat to all the rest of mankind. Those trapped within it are no better off. They are poor, illiterate, polygamous, (and thus without loving families) their women are mutilated or beaten, life is stagnant and oppressively repetitive, and everything good in life is denied to them. Music, wine, dance, poetry, art, sex, you name it -- and as a counter to this, a ruthlessly violent and unscrupulous world of rape, child molestation, prostitution, crime, debauchery, drugs and corruption behind closed doors. Whichever path the particular muslim takes, Islam has trapped his soul in perdition. All religions tend to deny evolution and thus the seminal insight that controls both morality and power in the real world. Without evolution, we can never understand ourselves, or our needs, and we will always be victims to those who do, either consciously or unconsciously, pursue the survival of the fittest.
Since fully 1/2 of the world and nearly the entirety of the western world holds one of these religious beliefs, even if they are slightly harmful their wronghood is multiplied by their popularity, creating a mountain of harm from even a slightly perverse beginning. It is frightening even in abstract that 1/3 of all humans on earth have endorsed the same values system, or more broadly speaking even 1/2. A healthy system requires diversity, the ability to change, progress, and adapt to the world around us. By becoming such a sickly, unadaptive, and inflexible single branch of human thought, we become vulnerable to pandemics of stupidity and ignorance, while losing all chance of strokes of genius and refinement.
#2: 'Nurture, not Nature, determines everything.'
This is the second most pervasive and dangerous lie on earth. The idea that genes basically create an empty vessel and then people pour in whatever they want flies in the face of everything we know about the animal kingdom and our own historical human nature, as well of course as all the twin studies and recent science of the modern era. This illusion, which makes all genes meaningless and thus all human variation a mere sidenote, has dangerously leveled a playing field between the superiors and inferiors of the earth. Hundreds of thousands of years of evolution, perhaps with refinements that can never be repeated again, could be lost chasing this lie. If genes are not regarded as meaningful, no preference will be paid to those of superior qualities, and eventually they will go extinct, simply diluted to non-existence by the massive upsurge of un-evolved mankind. Furthermore, this foolishness causes intractable friction with whites, for instance, trying to educate blacks in fields they'll never understand. Or attempt to fight black criminality in the same lenient way they would whites. Or create social safety nets for blacks as though they would be just as responsible with them as whites. Trillions of dollars and millions of lives are lost attempting the impossible with uplift programs like 'The Great Society' and 'The War on Poverty.' Democracy is assumed to be sensible because everyone is equally qualified to run a country, disparities in income are seen to be unjust because everyone is equally qualified at producing wealth, and so on. Every stupid idea on earth has some connection to the fraudulent faith in nurture as the source of human (e)quality.
It also causes genocidal rampages like those of the communists who attempted to remake mankind by silencing all critics and liquidating all potential opponents of their new world. Needless to say, it isn't so easy to remake mankind's genes as it is to control what is said in public, and so communism achieved nothing after all its tyranny but pain. People were still exactly the same underneath, and always would be, regardless of what they were taught in school. "To make an omelet, you must crack a few eggs," was the soviet justification for its gulags and genocidal purges, but that logic falls apart when you realize no 'omelet' of 'homo sovieticus' can be created because human nature is independent of any tyrant's cultural sway. A simple acknowledgment that force cannot make people better off, life fairer, people more loving, etc, would be a great step for freedom and security in the world. There are no shortcuts to utopia. Only a steady devotion to Truth and the steady application of science can get us there, and that requires a secure environment, a capitalist economy, the rule of law, freedom of speech, and many other freedoms we most hold dear.
#3 'Women and Men are interchangeable. They can do whatever they like, there is nothing particularly suited to either sex, and there is no best fit or relationship between the sexes. Two men, one man and ten women, a man and a goat, a man and a child or a single woman are just as good as a man and a woman. Nature provides no manual or plan for our relationships.'
Though we can say Islam is the most grievous flaw of asia and the power of nurture the most grievous flaw of multi-racial societies, this myth has specialized in the destruction of otherwise completely healthy lands. Places with 95% whites, largely atheist, who know better than to adopt communism, have still fallen for this lie and thus, the rot of inevitable death. Places like Scandinavia, Italy, and Germany that should have no problems anywhere on their radar are instead wilting just as or even faster than the USA. Without clear sex roles mandating the performance of people's evolved and necessary functions, society is thrown into confusion and enters a death spiral of unbelievably low birth rates. Only one half as many children exist as parents. A single generation of this madness is thus worse than the Black Plague, the worst disaster to ever befall Europe. A couple further generations and it is as though a meteor were to have slammed down on the continent akin to the end of the dinosaurs. If a death sentence were not enough proof of the wrong-headedness of this lie, the pain of contemporary society is an equally forceful argument. Never before have so many people been so lonely for so long. Divorce has skyrocketed to 50%+ of all marriages, the majority of children are illegitimate and without both parents to love and nurture them, there are no sisters or brothers for playmates, no cousins or uncles for companions, no economic safety net for those who fall on hard times by moving in with the parents, no rich inheritances following from a distant relative. The family is non-existent. To make things worse, no solace can be found in the love of one's husband or wife. Your marriage will more than likely include adultery, more than likely it will simply end in divorce. Inbetween, more than likely it will be full of fights, conflict, and irreconcilable differences. The dating world is hedonistic but heartbreaking, as lie after lie and disappointment after disappointment flit through decade after decade of singlehood.
The age of set gender roles created an entirely different world. One where love and duty went hand in hand, children had parents, siblings, and cousins every day of their life to live with, marriage was quick and divorce unthinkable. Men were heads of the household and providers for the home, women were the child-bearers, child-rearers, chore-doers, peace-makers, social event organizers and comforters. Virgins were prized and women were protected from both force and fraud. Marriage was encouraged and debauchery was forbidden. It was simply a different world. It is hard to imagine it existed just 60 years ago. I shudder to imagine what 60 more years of this lie will create.
#4. 'Evil does not exist. There are no malignant tendencies on this world, no threats, no cause for concern. There is nothing to fear and no one to mistrust.'
This lie is truly atrocious and again, incredibly widespread. The number of people who 'see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil' are legion, and they are the AIDS of any healthy mind's immune system. If we can not resist the evil in our midst, because people are sure that it doesn't even exist, the illness simply spreads and spreads. You would think that ruined cities like Detroit that look like bombed out wastelands would clue someone in that something evil, some dire threat, is in their midst. But you would be wrong! Due to this lie, that we should tolerate anyone and everything, that there is nothing to fear and 'this is the best of all possible worlds,' that any concerns are 'a conspiracy theory' and any naming of malignant parties is 'hate,' we are managing to literally go extinct without ever once even admitting there is a problem. As C.S. Lewis said, the greatest trick the Devil ever managed was convincing people he did not exist. The greatest trick jews ever pulled was convincing people they did not exist. "We aren't in power. We don't control the media. We don't donate the majority of all campaign funds to both the Republican and Democratic party. We don't use advertising as a weapon to keep companies toeing the politically correct line. We don't lie about and constantly harp on the Holocaust to gain sympathy. What are you talking about? All we ever do is work hard and hug kittens." Let us admit that things are not ideal, that a great deal of ruin confronts us in all directions: economic ruin, environmental ruin, moral ruin, familial ruin, racial ruin, cultural ruin, and that no such collapse could come about if every single person were a good healthy vibrant producer!!!! Someone has to be causing this damage, someone has to be a net negative, for a negative world to exist. If these people are not named and confronted, then where will it ever end?
Now imagine a Christian who believes we are all born equal blank slates who feels families come in 'all sizes, shapes and colors' and that no one anywhere on earth wishes her harm or would like to control her, intent on loving her neighbor as herself and then peacefully going to heaven, and you have the Juggernaut combined. Can you imagine this sort of mentality multiplied by a billion and then left to fend for itself in the world today? She and everyone with her would be destroyed, within mere decades, the whole thing would fall apart. The women will be dragged away for endless gang rapes and the men will be put to work in virtual slave-galleys of 99% taxes, the children, of course, simply would never be born.
If you have ever seen transformers or voltron or even power rangers, you know that each of these lies is piloted by its own person and fights well on its own, but combined it becomes an unstoppable cooperative giant robot of doom. Many have opposed it, but none have succeeded. The blazing sword cuts through all Voltron's foes equally. Those who would combat one lie but not the others are simply leaving a blind spot, an opening for Voltron to strike through. All lies work together, because they are all emanations from the same Father of Lies. If truth occasionally aids lies, occasionally opposes it. If truth occasionally fights other champions of truth, and occasionally liars. If truth stabs itself in the back while vigorously defending itself from the frontal assault of the green lion or the yellow lion of lies, how far do you expect it to go? A voltron of truth is the only opponent of a voltron of lies. Captain Planet is the only equal to Captain Pollution. Truth is only as powerful as its weakest link. The first lie that invades it cripples it against all the rest. As an alternative to Captain Pollution, we must form Captain Planet. Those who seek to redress any of the Big Lies, must stand for all the Big Truths. How obvious is this? Why must it even be mentioned?
Here is the Truth: #1: God is inscrutable, if he even exists, and all the religions of the earth are delusions fashioned by men for their own petty goals. If we must worship a God, let it be a God of Love, Beauty, and Truth, and reject any religious belief that interferes with goods so sacred and divine.
#2: Genes overwhelmingly make the man, nurture can spoil one's potential but can never raise it. The best thing we can do for everyone is accept them for who they are, and not try and change them into anything else, but instead to treat them accordingly. The best way to improve our collective lives is to restrict and encourage childbirth to happy, well qualified homes.
#3: Humans are meant to live in a network of monogamy. That is, the ideal and necessary life for human well being includes a man and a woman, strictly sexually faithful to each other for life, having at the very least a son and a daughter, starting at an early age when they are still healthy and pure, and that these children are loved and supported by both the mother and father every day of their lives. These children should then be given both the opportunity and encouragement to find wives and husbands of their own, at a time when they are still healthy and pure, and the cycle should continue with the same rhythm and inner beauty as the birdsongs of spring. The family should be aware of and interact with the extended family, the extended family should be aware of and interact with the village, and the village should be aware of and interact with the nation. Hospitality and love should flow freely between every member of the group. Loneliness should not arise in a properly connected world.
#4: Life is struggle, and murder is the daily routine of every bacteria, plant, animal and man simply to survive another day. We must never imagine that disaster cannot befall us, that parasitism has vanished, that predators have moved away, and that the 'lion has lain down with the lamb.' There is evil in every heart, dark passions in every man and woman, and there is danger in the air we breathe, the water we drink, the light of the sun, every chemical, every fad, every idea and every choice. Nothing is ever easy, nothing is free. The answer is to know our enemy, know ourself, and be the victor of a thousand battles. It is not to run, hide, or put our heads in the sand. We must endure and overcome, such is the path of heroes, and heroism is the path to eternity.
Together, we can form a Captain Planet, A voltron with a blazing sword. Independently, no single truth can save us and no truth will get us anywhere. It will be a self-defeating, abortive attempt like so many others that have obviously failed all around us. The 'christian conservatives' have lost headway every year for a century. The 'libertarians' have lost to socialism and tyranny every year for a century. The do-gooders have failed to achieve any of their goals, whether it be world peace, an end to world hunger, women's lib or worldwide democracy. The environmentalists have tried in vain to save endangered species, prevent global warming, prevent population growth or create sustainable energy. The anti-racists have never managed to stamp out hate and distrust between the races, even when they live cheek by jowl in integrated schools and workplaces. The communists simply cannot stop the inequality of incomes within countries and between them. There has been a worldwide failure of every goal on earth, and meanwhile we all together ride towards the cliff of irretrievable breakdown. It's time for something new. Something more inclusive, a larger paradigm that includes more than one idea. Something as complex as humanity itself. Something not reduced to a singular, bullheaded and obdurate point. A synthesis of Truth that confronts all lies everywhere. An alloy of Good that confronts evil on even terms. The forces of darkness are powerful, they are united, and they intend to devour us all. How long will petty enmities and meaningless rivalries keep the forces of light fractured and impotent? We must stand for all Truths everywhere, or each truth will surely hang separately.
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Sunday, April 26, 2009
The Sword of Truth, The Haze of Lies
"There is not a truth existing which I fear or would wish unknown to the whole world."
--Thomas Jefferson.
"Live not by lies."
--Aleksander Solzhenitsyn.
The Devil is the "Father of Lies." This should clue anyone in, that lying is evil. That living a lie is base, corrupt, and wrong. That enduring lies and not challenging them is moral cowardice. That anyone serving or propagating a lie is a disciple of Satan and man's mortal enemy. I wrote post after post saying lying is not acceptable, not for any reason. Here is a quote:
"If you adopt only those truths which suit you, while denying those truths which you find distasteful, like some sort of chinese menu, you are a coward, a hypocrite, and a cur."
"People who wrap themselves in their pet causes and start clamoring on about how offended they are, how insufferable those who question their delusions are, how everyone on earth has to cater to them and never speak ill of anything they want, are no better than blacks insisting they’re equal and they built the pyramids or invented the refrigerator."
"So no, we can not accept ’some’ lies for the sake of civility, or machiavellan policy, or any other excuse. Life without truth is worthless. Never ask that of anyone."
The Holocaust is a lie. I can back this up with endless evidence, the most basic of which is there are no mass graves where the jews were supposedly killed. We are still finding mass graves of Soviet slaughters of Croatians, we find mass graves of Serbians, we find mass graves of Iraqis, we find every mass grave that's ever been, even when they are random places with no marker. In Poland, however, we are told exactly where the mass graves are, we are standing on top of the concentration camps, and yet we can't find any mass graves. The only explanation for this is there were none in the first place. The alternate explanation, that the Nazis had magic evidence-b-gone chalk that whisked jewish bodies away into a spirit realm without disturbing any soil layers and without leaving any teeth or bones behind, is ludicrous and an obvious lie. If anyone took ten seconds to clear their heads of all the brainwashing they've been suffering at the hands of jewish media, they would be able to make just a quick assessment and conclusion that the whole thing is a farce. But it requires the mind of Descartes, who banished everything he believed and started over with a blank slate willing to accept anything logic would arrive at, to actually get to the truth in situations like these.
For those willing to give a fresh look at the Holocaust and a complete review of all the evidence of its falsehood and lack of evidence for its claims, I have uploaded Dissecting the Holocaust to my dropbox. To download it, just go to dropbox.com, type in the email of trodjinn@gmail.com, and the password olives. Download the .pdf file 'Dissecting the Holocaust' and away you go. Trust me, anyone who actually reads that book will be convinced and will change their mind from any previous stance. There is no way, after reading the book in its entirety, for anyone to believe the traditional holocaust narrative afterwards. I took the Holocaust for granted until I read it, and by the end I was absolutely converted. All it took was an open mind. I have an open mind that obeys the Truth, not delusions that are convenient for me, and so the process was quite rapid. For others, they will refuse to ever look into the issue. They are simply cowards or sheep without the intellect to come to their own conclusions. There's a third group that is even more weaselly however. There are people who know full well the holocaust is a fraud, but go on pretending it's true. They enforce the holocaust meme on others and ostracize/condemn those who tell the truth, even though they know it's true. They abandon those who are jailed for holocaust denial and don't speak up for them, even though they know they are innocent of all wrongdoing and simply standing up for truth and justice. This is Uhuru Guru. They do this with various excuses. For the sake of 'respectability.' Or because they don't want to lose their loved ones good opinion. Or because they are afraid to say it due to the authorities. Or because they have a 'master plan' where they will slowly convert people with the easier truths first, and the hardest ones last. Whatever, there's a million reasons to lie, but every single one of them serves the Father of Lies. There is only one reason to tell the truth, and that reason trumps all of them. Truth is an absolute. Truth does not compromise. Truth is not interested in summer soldiers. Either you are a man of integrity and conviction, or a weasel who will say anything at anytime that gains you any advantage. Life without truth is not worth living, this is both philosophically clear and empirically proven. Those who have had to mouth lies all their lives are broken, miserable men on the way to extinction. Not only does it corrupt people's souls and weaken their life-force, but it leads to ludicrous conclusions that no one can counteract that lead to immediate practical harm. For instance, the communists of China felt crops should be planted close together because communism was all about supporting each other and huddling together, and this was just as true of the plant world as the human world. Needless to say, the crops viciously competed with all their nearby 'huddlers' for the nutrients and water, most of them died, and famine broke out killing tens of millions. This obvious lie was known to all the farmers, they had planted the crops distant from each other for thousands of years for a reason, because they knew it worked better that way. But they could not say anything, they could not speak up against the lie for fear of execution, so instead the whole thing was carried out to its inevitable conclusion. A society based on a lie, any lie, will eventually lead to a ludicrous decision like this which will destroy the country. Anyone anywhere who lives a lie is on the path to extinction. The clock is ticking. That is why, from a purely practical point of view, accepting a lie, any lie, anywhere in your society, is a mortal error.
The Holocaust is the only historical event in the world that it is illegal to question. You can have any theory you want over the nuking of Japan, the rape of Nanjing, the firebombing of Dresden, or any older war, but if you question the Holocaust in most of the 1st world, you go to jail. Why? What makes jews so special? What makes their suffering so important that it's blasphemy to challenge it? People can mock and downplay the suffering of Chinese in WWII, who lost 30 million people, not '6 million.' They can mock and downplay the deaths of the Russian people, who lost 20 million people, not '6 million.' But if you mock and downplay the suffering of the jewish people, you are thrown in jail for 'hurting their sensitive feelings' and, basically, blasphemy. The difference is power. Jews currently rule the world, and as a benefit, they get to erect double standards that especially favor them. Holocaust Denial is a crime, no other historical revisionism is. No other country should be homogeneous or control its borders, but Israel has the right to be a homogeneous jewish state with control of their borders. No one else can have anti-miscegenation laws, but in Israel it is illegal for a jew to marry a non-jew. No one else can define their country based on blood kinship, but Israel's definition of jew and law of return is anyone who is descended by blood from a jew, NOT their religious beliefs.
Currently nearly every child in the 1st world is required to learn about the Holocaust in school, there are thousands of holocaust memorial museums, something like 150 movies have been made on the holocaust and multiple new ones come out every year. Not a day goes by without jews reminding us of the Holocaust, how horrible it was, how evil we were for doing it, and how we must do everything in our power to prevent any thinking that might lead to another holocaust someday. All this for the death of '6 million' jews. But what of the 20 million Russians? The 30 million Chinese? The millions of pacific islanders? The millions of Germans? The 10 million Ukrainians and others who died due Stalin's persecutions in the 1930's? Where are their movies? Where are their museums? Where are their classroom lessons? Where are their spokesmen appearing on TV everyday discussing how we can never allow another holodomor? This is a double standard. The jews get to be remembered because they're in power, they control the schools, the media, the movies, and therefore they control what is discussed. They'd prefer to endlessly harp on the suffering of jews and the special victimhood of jews, and thus the sheeple and lemmings accept that and become the willing tools and zombies of this blanket saturation.
How does the Holocaust lie lead to a mortal error in our society? You'd think the exact number of jews who died in a war 60 years ago wouldn't matter one way or another. It should be as meaningless as the number of French who died at Waterloo. But this is how insidious lies are. No matter how trivial it seems, take a lie into your bosom, and the snake will bite, and the venom will spread to every organ, and you Will perish. The Holocaust lie serves two roles, it dampens nationalism everywhere because people fear it might lead to 'another Holocaust.' It associates nationalism with hate and genocide, and thus deters people from accepting it. This restricts people from the best political and philosophical system on earth, leading to the destruction of their civilizations one after another via mass immigration and multiculti cultural relativism. That alone is a mortal error caused by the Holohoax. But it serves another purpose, and that is to make jews an untouchable victim race who can never be criticized no matter what they do. This special force field, the holocaust lie, gives them an immunity to all resistance no matter how evil they are towards others. Have jews just bombed gaza into ruins in retaliation for a rocket that hurt no one? THE HOLOCAUST. Have jews just thrown our economic situation in chaos all over the world due to bad lending and monetary decisions? THE HOLOCAUST. Have jews yet again endlessly lobbied for war with Iraq, Iran, or some other innocent nation causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands? THE HOLOCAUST. Have jews unfairly favored each other in close-knit circles of movie making, book publishing, proffesorships, etc? THE HOLOCAUST. Have jews founded the NAACP, the ADL, the SPLC, the Communist Party, the ANC, and every other subversive organization determined to wipe out whites worldwide? THE HOLOCAUST. And now you see that a random lie about exactly how many jews died in WWII, by being accepted, leads to universal ruin and destruction. There is no such thing as an innocuous, unimportant lie. If the lie is not defeated, it will strangle you to death. If the lie is not pierced, it will crush you. If you do not wield the sword of truth, you will choke to death on the poisonous haze of lies. If you do not follow the straight and narrow path, you will be lost forever in the wilderness. There is no choice in the matter. Either you serve God, who said, quite simply: "I am Truth." Or you serve the Devil, who is, quite simply, The Father of Lies.
When I saw a fellow patriot in need, David Duke, who has done more for whites than any other man on earth, I rushed to his defense and fought the vicious lies being used against him. Uhuru Guru stabbed him in the back, erased the post, and banished me. Between the two, who reacted properly? I have no regrets. If I can't tell the truth, I have no use for such a website. If the website refuses to tell the truth, no reader should have any use in reading it. Compromised as it now is, the entire edifice is just a pile of shit. And as a result, all it can do now is post naked black porn, make stunted, meaninglessly vague statements like 'multiculturalism magically appeared out of nowhere, for no reason, no group is pushing it on us, no people are funding it or propagating it, and there is no reason why it is still believed today.' Gee, what an amazing analysis. Or, we could go where the truth leads us, realize jews, a hyper-smart, hyper-ethnocentric group are determined to create a world that best suits them, but no one else, and then fight them head-on for all we're worth.
This is how Jews view the world:
"Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves."
--Menachim Begin, FORMER PRESIDENT OF ISRAEL!!
Jews have made their agenda clear. We are to be their cattle or simply crushed like insects under their feet. We are to lick their feet for life. Uhuru Guru is apparently fine with this and strives every day not to offend jews and to censor any criticism of jews off his website. I, however, am not fine with this. I see no reason why I should lick jews' feet or be their cattle. The choice is yours.
--Thomas Jefferson.
"Live not by lies."
--Aleksander Solzhenitsyn.
The Devil is the "Father of Lies." This should clue anyone in, that lying is evil. That living a lie is base, corrupt, and wrong. That enduring lies and not challenging them is moral cowardice. That anyone serving or propagating a lie is a disciple of Satan and man's mortal enemy. I wrote post after post saying lying is not acceptable, not for any reason. Here is a quote:
"If you adopt only those truths which suit you, while denying those truths which you find distasteful, like some sort of chinese menu, you are a coward, a hypocrite, and a cur."
"People who wrap themselves in their pet causes and start clamoring on about how offended they are, how insufferable those who question their delusions are, how everyone on earth has to cater to them and never speak ill of anything they want, are no better than blacks insisting they’re equal and they built the pyramids or invented the refrigerator."
"So no, we can not accept ’some’ lies for the sake of civility, or machiavellan policy, or any other excuse. Life without truth is worthless. Never ask that of anyone."
The Holocaust is a lie. I can back this up with endless evidence, the most basic of which is there are no mass graves where the jews were supposedly killed. We are still finding mass graves of Soviet slaughters of Croatians, we find mass graves of Serbians, we find mass graves of Iraqis, we find every mass grave that's ever been, even when they are random places with no marker. In Poland, however, we are told exactly where the mass graves are, we are standing on top of the concentration camps, and yet we can't find any mass graves. The only explanation for this is there were none in the first place. The alternate explanation, that the Nazis had magic evidence-b-gone chalk that whisked jewish bodies away into a spirit realm without disturbing any soil layers and without leaving any teeth or bones behind, is ludicrous and an obvious lie. If anyone took ten seconds to clear their heads of all the brainwashing they've been suffering at the hands of jewish media, they would be able to make just a quick assessment and conclusion that the whole thing is a farce. But it requires the mind of Descartes, who banished everything he believed and started over with a blank slate willing to accept anything logic would arrive at, to actually get to the truth in situations like these.
For those willing to give a fresh look at the Holocaust and a complete review of all the evidence of its falsehood and lack of evidence for its claims, I have uploaded Dissecting the Holocaust to my dropbox. To download it, just go to dropbox.com, type in the email of trodjinn@gmail.com, and the password olives. Download the .pdf file 'Dissecting the Holocaust' and away you go. Trust me, anyone who actually reads that book will be convinced and will change their mind from any previous stance. There is no way, after reading the book in its entirety, for anyone to believe the traditional holocaust narrative afterwards. I took the Holocaust for granted until I read it, and by the end I was absolutely converted. All it took was an open mind. I have an open mind that obeys the Truth, not delusions that are convenient for me, and so the process was quite rapid. For others, they will refuse to ever look into the issue. They are simply cowards or sheep without the intellect to come to their own conclusions. There's a third group that is even more weaselly however. There are people who know full well the holocaust is a fraud, but go on pretending it's true. They enforce the holocaust meme on others and ostracize/condemn those who tell the truth, even though they know it's true. They abandon those who are jailed for holocaust denial and don't speak up for them, even though they know they are innocent of all wrongdoing and simply standing up for truth and justice. This is Uhuru Guru. They do this with various excuses. For the sake of 'respectability.' Or because they don't want to lose their loved ones good opinion. Or because they are afraid to say it due to the authorities. Or because they have a 'master plan' where they will slowly convert people with the easier truths first, and the hardest ones last. Whatever, there's a million reasons to lie, but every single one of them serves the Father of Lies. There is only one reason to tell the truth, and that reason trumps all of them. Truth is an absolute. Truth does not compromise. Truth is not interested in summer soldiers. Either you are a man of integrity and conviction, or a weasel who will say anything at anytime that gains you any advantage. Life without truth is not worth living, this is both philosophically clear and empirically proven. Those who have had to mouth lies all their lives are broken, miserable men on the way to extinction. Not only does it corrupt people's souls and weaken their life-force, but it leads to ludicrous conclusions that no one can counteract that lead to immediate practical harm. For instance, the communists of China felt crops should be planted close together because communism was all about supporting each other and huddling together, and this was just as true of the plant world as the human world. Needless to say, the crops viciously competed with all their nearby 'huddlers' for the nutrients and water, most of them died, and famine broke out killing tens of millions. This obvious lie was known to all the farmers, they had planted the crops distant from each other for thousands of years for a reason, because they knew it worked better that way. But they could not say anything, they could not speak up against the lie for fear of execution, so instead the whole thing was carried out to its inevitable conclusion. A society based on a lie, any lie, will eventually lead to a ludicrous decision like this which will destroy the country. Anyone anywhere who lives a lie is on the path to extinction. The clock is ticking. That is why, from a purely practical point of view, accepting a lie, any lie, anywhere in your society, is a mortal error.
The Holocaust is the only historical event in the world that it is illegal to question. You can have any theory you want over the nuking of Japan, the rape of Nanjing, the firebombing of Dresden, or any older war, but if you question the Holocaust in most of the 1st world, you go to jail. Why? What makes jews so special? What makes their suffering so important that it's blasphemy to challenge it? People can mock and downplay the suffering of Chinese in WWII, who lost 30 million people, not '6 million.' They can mock and downplay the deaths of the Russian people, who lost 20 million people, not '6 million.' But if you mock and downplay the suffering of the jewish people, you are thrown in jail for 'hurting their sensitive feelings' and, basically, blasphemy. The difference is power. Jews currently rule the world, and as a benefit, they get to erect double standards that especially favor them. Holocaust Denial is a crime, no other historical revisionism is. No other country should be homogeneous or control its borders, but Israel has the right to be a homogeneous jewish state with control of their borders. No one else can have anti-miscegenation laws, but in Israel it is illegal for a jew to marry a non-jew. No one else can define their country based on blood kinship, but Israel's definition of jew and law of return is anyone who is descended by blood from a jew, NOT their religious beliefs.
Currently nearly every child in the 1st world is required to learn about the Holocaust in school, there are thousands of holocaust memorial museums, something like 150 movies have been made on the holocaust and multiple new ones come out every year. Not a day goes by without jews reminding us of the Holocaust, how horrible it was, how evil we were for doing it, and how we must do everything in our power to prevent any thinking that might lead to another holocaust someday. All this for the death of '6 million' jews. But what of the 20 million Russians? The 30 million Chinese? The millions of pacific islanders? The millions of Germans? The 10 million Ukrainians and others who died due Stalin's persecutions in the 1930's? Where are their movies? Where are their museums? Where are their classroom lessons? Where are their spokesmen appearing on TV everyday discussing how we can never allow another holodomor? This is a double standard. The jews get to be remembered because they're in power, they control the schools, the media, the movies, and therefore they control what is discussed. They'd prefer to endlessly harp on the suffering of jews and the special victimhood of jews, and thus the sheeple and lemmings accept that and become the willing tools and zombies of this blanket saturation.
How does the Holocaust lie lead to a mortal error in our society? You'd think the exact number of jews who died in a war 60 years ago wouldn't matter one way or another. It should be as meaningless as the number of French who died at Waterloo. But this is how insidious lies are. No matter how trivial it seems, take a lie into your bosom, and the snake will bite, and the venom will spread to every organ, and you Will perish. The Holocaust lie serves two roles, it dampens nationalism everywhere because people fear it might lead to 'another Holocaust.' It associates nationalism with hate and genocide, and thus deters people from accepting it. This restricts people from the best political and philosophical system on earth, leading to the destruction of their civilizations one after another via mass immigration and multiculti cultural relativism. That alone is a mortal error caused by the Holohoax. But it serves another purpose, and that is to make jews an untouchable victim race who can never be criticized no matter what they do. This special force field, the holocaust lie, gives them an immunity to all resistance no matter how evil they are towards others. Have jews just bombed gaza into ruins in retaliation for a rocket that hurt no one? THE HOLOCAUST. Have jews just thrown our economic situation in chaos all over the world due to bad lending and monetary decisions? THE HOLOCAUST. Have jews yet again endlessly lobbied for war with Iraq, Iran, or some other innocent nation causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands? THE HOLOCAUST. Have jews unfairly favored each other in close-knit circles of movie making, book publishing, proffesorships, etc? THE HOLOCAUST. Have jews founded the NAACP, the ADL, the SPLC, the Communist Party, the ANC, and every other subversive organization determined to wipe out whites worldwide? THE HOLOCAUST. And now you see that a random lie about exactly how many jews died in WWII, by being accepted, leads to universal ruin and destruction. There is no such thing as an innocuous, unimportant lie. If the lie is not defeated, it will strangle you to death. If the lie is not pierced, it will crush you. If you do not wield the sword of truth, you will choke to death on the poisonous haze of lies. If you do not follow the straight and narrow path, you will be lost forever in the wilderness. There is no choice in the matter. Either you serve God, who said, quite simply: "I am Truth." Or you serve the Devil, who is, quite simply, The Father of Lies.
When I saw a fellow patriot in need, David Duke, who has done more for whites than any other man on earth, I rushed to his defense and fought the vicious lies being used against him. Uhuru Guru stabbed him in the back, erased the post, and banished me. Between the two, who reacted properly? I have no regrets. If I can't tell the truth, I have no use for such a website. If the website refuses to tell the truth, no reader should have any use in reading it. Compromised as it now is, the entire edifice is just a pile of shit. And as a result, all it can do now is post naked black porn, make stunted, meaninglessly vague statements like 'multiculturalism magically appeared out of nowhere, for no reason, no group is pushing it on us, no people are funding it or propagating it, and there is no reason why it is still believed today.' Gee, what an amazing analysis. Or, we could go where the truth leads us, realize jews, a hyper-smart, hyper-ethnocentric group are determined to create a world that best suits them, but no one else, and then fight them head-on for all we're worth.
This is how Jews view the world:
"Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves."
--Menachim Begin, FORMER PRESIDENT OF ISRAEL!!
Jews have made their agenda clear. We are to be their cattle or simply crushed like insects under their feet. We are to lick their feet for life. Uhuru Guru is apparently fine with this and strives every day not to offend jews and to censor any criticism of jews off his website. I, however, am not fine with this. I see no reason why I should lick jews' feet or be their cattle. The choice is yours.
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Are Jews Immune to Demographics?
Are Jews Immune to Demographics?
Many people have said jews are genociding the white world, while fiendishly profiting from our loss themselves. Jews will stand above it all, refuse to practice what they preach, and emerge unscathed from the racial chaos. Is this supported by the data though? Or are jews caught in the same ideological trap as they’ve sprung on others? I thought a more thorough data crunch might reveal a different take on Jewish malfeasance. Instead of the ‘double standards’ theory where Jews have one, secret standard for themselves and another, intentionally malicious standard for others, the data better fits a single suicidal standard they apply to themselves and others in the genuine belief it is somehow a noble, moral ideal. This is not the first time religious enthusiasm has led to mass suicide. Jim Jones, the comet of Hale-Bopp, and the Shakers, are other well-known examples of this phenomena. If liberalism is simply a suicide cult, the destructive nature of Jews is revealed as a simple missionary fervor combined with an irrational idea. The only unique part of this cult was how persuasive and influential jews are, thus making it the largest suicide cult in world history, with the most adherents ever assembled.
So which of the models makes more sense? If Jews have one standard meant to undercut the population of whites, and another standard for themselves meant to further their ethnic interests, then we should see a growing Jewish population and a shrinking white population. If Jews are suicidal fanatics with missionary zeal to drag others with them, we should see Jewish population falling at the highest rate and their roped-in lemmings falling alongside them, perhaps at a slower and less dramatic rate.
Assuming nothing revolutionary happens in the world and current trends carry on as normal, how will things look in 2050?
http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/012496.html
The non-Hispanic, single-race white population is projected to be only slightly larger in 2050 (203.3 million) than in 2008 (199.8 million). In fact, this group is projected to lose population in the 2030s and 2040s and comprise 46 percent of the total population in 2050, down from 66 percent in 2008.
Sad news for whites in terms of percentages, but the good news is our population in 2050 will be higher than it is today. The survival instinct of whites in America still seems to be rather strong, far higher than Japanese for instance, who have no jews influencing their decisions at all.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/106625
For the jews the situation is quite different.
The demographic catastrophe presently decimating American Jewry is not in dispute. Without numbing you with statistics, the basic facts are absolutely clear and chilling. The 6 million Jews in America will probably number no more than a couple of million by midcentury.
Until 1960 few Jews married non-Jews. Now more than half of the Jews who marry are marrying unconverted Christians. Only 30 percent of their children, and only 4 percent of their grandchildren are raised as Jews. Some demographers say our birthrate is the lowest of any group in America, so we are now older than any group in America.
So here we have jews losing 2/3 of their population by 2050 while white population slightly grows. Are we looking at diabolical jewish malfeasance applying double standards to further their interests at our expense? Or insane idiots destroying themselves while the rest of America largely looks on with amusement?
Another source for the same 2/3 prediction is at Amren: http://amren.com/ar/2008/05/index.html#article2
Ironically, as Mr. Entine notes, social acceptance and assimilation may yet destroy what pogroms could not. Except for the Orthodox, Jews have very small families, and about half of American and European Jews now marry outside the tribe. In 1920, fewer than 1 percent married out. At current intermarriage rates, notes Mr. Entine, two-thirds of Jews could be gone in a few generations.
Amren is giving us a hint here. How do we get rid of our jews? Easy--watch them implode. If we wait just 40 more years the jewish problem will have largely erased itself.
What about Israel? Is it growing in population such that Jewish ethnic interests are somehow still prospering by present Jewish conduct? Mind you they’re set to lose 4 million jews in America alone, so we’d have to see some dramatic growth in Israel’s jewish population to offset such a loss.
http://books.google.com/books?id=I2PYTmFwQxcC&pg=PA39&lpg=PA39&dq=Israel%2Bpopulation%2Bprojections%2B2050&source=bl&ots=PC_iP1O_Fv&sig=IPBVmh2CoHisah84FZlKZDjC4R0&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result
By 2050, the jewish population would range between 6.9 million and 9.7 million.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/is.html#People
Current jewish population in Israel is 5.4 million. So we are looking at a best case scenario, 4.3 million jew increase in Israel. Not only that, but they are continuously losing percentage ground to the arab Israelis within their borders:
http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/world-jewish-population.htm#_Toc26172079
The overall fertility rate of the Moslems is 4.6%, while that of Israeli Jews is 2.6%. The 110,000 Bedouins of the Negev have the highest fertility rate, with a 5.9% growth rate. Half the Bedouins are below the age of 13. The population doubles every 12 years. Excluding the Bedouins, the Moslem growth rate is 3.2%, still way above the 2.6% of the Jews. Put differently, there are 2.6 births per Jewish woman, against 4.6 births per Moslem woman. (In 1970, there were 9 births per Moslem woman.)
The immigration policy of Israel also favors a demographic shift away from a Jewish population. It is generally believed that 60% of those who have made aliyah in the last ten years are not Jewish.
Looking at world jewish populations then, 2050 will have fewer jews on earth than 2009, and the jews of Israel will be in an even more precarious position than ever. If this is a giant scheme to increase jewish population at the cost of the white host society, even by reaping the benefits in Israel while collecting the money elsewhere, jews are enacting it very poorly. The simpler explanation is Jews have bought into a death cult. The death cult reads like this: women should live sophisticated, self-satisfactory lives defined by their jobs and degrees. Childbirth should be avoided as distracting, a career cost, and generally too demeaning for a woman to do. Women should be wage earners and not rely on men to provide for them so that they can have children early. Instead women should trust no one, and make sure they are independently rich. Women should marry outside the race if this makes them happy, and pay no attention to whether they are preserving their genes, culture, or religion. Divorce should be the answer to all relationship difficulties, abortion should be the answer to all pregnancies. This single standard is being suggested as a wonderful idea for BOTH jews AND non-jews. They are applying it more strictly to themselves than anyone else. So long as whites successfully avoid embracing the death cult, there is no real need to take on the jews. The fact that our population will still be over 200 million by 2050 shows our race has the good sense to largely ignore the lifestyle jews have chosen for themselves.
In conclusion, I suggest jews are not fiendishly pursuing their racial interests by applying double standards that all work to their own good. As far as I can tell, Jews have embraced a death cult and are destroying themselves, along with anyone foolish enough to listen to their siren song. If the white race simply ties ourselves to the mast and puts wax in our ears as we sail by the fading jewish race, if we simply wait them and their silly songs out and sail to the other side of the century, ignoring them for all we’re worth, jews will cease to be of any importance to us pro or con. This suggests an intellectual battle with jewish ideals, but a strategic refrainment from a physical battle that would give jews some new victimization card and slow down our intermarriage rates with jews (which, given their tiny numbers, is solely a biological weapon against them not us). From a moral standpoint, it’s always better when Nature genocides our enemies than when we do, and from a practical standpoint, the last time a country tried to drive out all its jews, it ended up in cinders, so it might not be a good idea to repeat.
Many people have said jews are genociding the white world, while fiendishly profiting from our loss themselves. Jews will stand above it all, refuse to practice what they preach, and emerge unscathed from the racial chaos. Is this supported by the data though? Or are jews caught in the same ideological trap as they’ve sprung on others? I thought a more thorough data crunch might reveal a different take on Jewish malfeasance. Instead of the ‘double standards’ theory where Jews have one, secret standard for themselves and another, intentionally malicious standard for others, the data better fits a single suicidal standard they apply to themselves and others in the genuine belief it is somehow a noble, moral ideal. This is not the first time religious enthusiasm has led to mass suicide. Jim Jones, the comet of Hale-Bopp, and the Shakers, are other well-known examples of this phenomena. If liberalism is simply a suicide cult, the destructive nature of Jews is revealed as a simple missionary fervor combined with an irrational idea. The only unique part of this cult was how persuasive and influential jews are, thus making it the largest suicide cult in world history, with the most adherents ever assembled.
So which of the models makes more sense? If Jews have one standard meant to undercut the population of whites, and another standard for themselves meant to further their ethnic interests, then we should see a growing Jewish population and a shrinking white population. If Jews are suicidal fanatics with missionary zeal to drag others with them, we should see Jewish population falling at the highest rate and their roped-in lemmings falling alongside them, perhaps at a slower and less dramatic rate.
Assuming nothing revolutionary happens in the world and current trends carry on as normal, how will things look in 2050?
http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/012496.html
The non-Hispanic, single-race white population is projected to be only slightly larger in 2050 (203.3 million) than in 2008 (199.8 million). In fact, this group is projected to lose population in the 2030s and 2040s and comprise 46 percent of the total population in 2050, down from 66 percent in 2008.
Sad news for whites in terms of percentages, but the good news is our population in 2050 will be higher than it is today. The survival instinct of whites in America still seems to be rather strong, far higher than Japanese for instance, who have no jews influencing their decisions at all.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/106625
For the jews the situation is quite different.
The demographic catastrophe presently decimating American Jewry is not in dispute. Without numbing you with statistics, the basic facts are absolutely clear and chilling. The 6 million Jews in America will probably number no more than a couple of million by midcentury.
Until 1960 few Jews married non-Jews. Now more than half of the Jews who marry are marrying unconverted Christians. Only 30 percent of their children, and only 4 percent of their grandchildren are raised as Jews. Some demographers say our birthrate is the lowest of any group in America, so we are now older than any group in America.
So here we have jews losing 2/3 of their population by 2050 while white population slightly grows. Are we looking at diabolical jewish malfeasance applying double standards to further their interests at our expense? Or insane idiots destroying themselves while the rest of America largely looks on with amusement?
Another source for the same 2/3 prediction is at Amren: http://amren.com/ar/2008/05/index.html#article2
Ironically, as Mr. Entine notes, social acceptance and assimilation may yet destroy what pogroms could not. Except for the Orthodox, Jews have very small families, and about half of American and European Jews now marry outside the tribe. In 1920, fewer than 1 percent married out. At current intermarriage rates, notes Mr. Entine, two-thirds of Jews could be gone in a few generations.
Amren is giving us a hint here. How do we get rid of our jews? Easy--watch them implode. If we wait just 40 more years the jewish problem will have largely erased itself.
What about Israel? Is it growing in population such that Jewish ethnic interests are somehow still prospering by present Jewish conduct? Mind you they’re set to lose 4 million jews in America alone, so we’d have to see some dramatic growth in Israel’s jewish population to offset such a loss.
http://books.google.com/books?id=I2PYTmFwQxcC&pg=PA39&lpg=PA39&dq=Israel%2Bpopulation%2Bprojections%2B2050&source=bl&ots=PC_iP1O_Fv&sig=IPBVmh2CoHisah84FZlKZDjC4R0&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result
By 2050, the jewish population would range between 6.9 million and 9.7 million.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/is.html#People
Current jewish population in Israel is 5.4 million. So we are looking at a best case scenario, 4.3 million jew increase in Israel. Not only that, but they are continuously losing percentage ground to the arab Israelis within their borders:
http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/world-jewish-population.htm#_Toc26172079
The overall fertility rate of the Moslems is 4.6%, while that of Israeli Jews is 2.6%. The 110,000 Bedouins of the Negev have the highest fertility rate, with a 5.9% growth rate. Half the Bedouins are below the age of 13. The population doubles every 12 years. Excluding the Bedouins, the Moslem growth rate is 3.2%, still way above the 2.6% of the Jews. Put differently, there are 2.6 births per Jewish woman, against 4.6 births per Moslem woman. (In 1970, there were 9 births per Moslem woman.)
The immigration policy of Israel also favors a demographic shift away from a Jewish population. It is generally believed that 60% of those who have made aliyah in the last ten years are not Jewish.
Looking at world jewish populations then, 2050 will have fewer jews on earth than 2009, and the jews of Israel will be in an even more precarious position than ever. If this is a giant scheme to increase jewish population at the cost of the white host society, even by reaping the benefits in Israel while collecting the money elsewhere, jews are enacting it very poorly. The simpler explanation is Jews have bought into a death cult. The death cult reads like this: women should live sophisticated, self-satisfactory lives defined by their jobs and degrees. Childbirth should be avoided as distracting, a career cost, and generally too demeaning for a woman to do. Women should be wage earners and not rely on men to provide for them so that they can have children early. Instead women should trust no one, and make sure they are independently rich. Women should marry outside the race if this makes them happy, and pay no attention to whether they are preserving their genes, culture, or religion. Divorce should be the answer to all relationship difficulties, abortion should be the answer to all pregnancies. This single standard is being suggested as a wonderful idea for BOTH jews AND non-jews. They are applying it more strictly to themselves than anyone else. So long as whites successfully avoid embracing the death cult, there is no real need to take on the jews. The fact that our population will still be over 200 million by 2050 shows our race has the good sense to largely ignore the lifestyle jews have chosen for themselves.
In conclusion, I suggest jews are not fiendishly pursuing their racial interests by applying double standards that all work to their own good. As far as I can tell, Jews have embraced a death cult and are destroying themselves, along with anyone foolish enough to listen to their siren song. If the white race simply ties ourselves to the mast and puts wax in our ears as we sail by the fading jewish race, if we simply wait them and their silly songs out and sail to the other side of the century, ignoring them for all we’re worth, jews will cease to be of any importance to us pro or con. This suggests an intellectual battle with jewish ideals, but a strategic refrainment from a physical battle that would give jews some new victimization card and slow down our intermarriage rates with jews (which, given their tiny numbers, is solely a biological weapon against them not us). From a moral standpoint, it’s always better when Nature genocides our enemies than when we do, and from a practical standpoint, the last time a country tried to drive out all its jews, it ended up in cinders, so it might not be a good idea to repeat.
Crack this Walnut
Crack this Walnut
Genes have loose correlations to all sorts of things. Personality, behavior, beliefs, ideals, emotional tendencies, and of course the mother of them all IQ.
However, none of these correlations are 100%. Many are as low as 20%. What would become of a society that accepted genetic differences, good and bad, and concentrated solely on developing everyone we can to their fullest potential? For instance, suppose someone has a genetic predisposition to alcoholism. If raised correctly, and with enough force of will, this person can avoid drinking and thus never become an alcoholic. Here we have genes weaving their nefarious webs, and culture cutting right through them. How many other victories could we as a nation, and we as individuals, score over our genetic default?
Is there really no hope of progress, no chance at a better life? Are we doomed to repeat the same mistakes over and over, we as individuals and we as groups, just because we have certain tendencies, or correlations, or predispositions, towards those things? There are no 100% correlations between genes and anything else. This means nothing is decided, no one is past hope, we can always change people for the better—if only we try hard enough.
At a certain period in US history, blacks were all free, and were also committing very few crimes, they wore respectable dress, they had a solid family life, and for all intents and purposes they were completely harmless additions to our society. Take a picture of blacks in 1910, 1920, or what have you and they look just like anyone else. No government handouts were being rewarded to them, no drug gangs were infesting inner cities, nothing. The genes of the black race probably haven’t changed much in the last few generations, but their behavior certainly has. This means culture can determine everything. Who cares if blacks start from a lower base? They can still become decent fellows with good lives, perfectly integrated into our society and economy. Ditch the bad habits, relearn the lessons of the past, and blacks will be as good as new.
If even blacks can perform well, with their genetic flaws, what then of any other race? Do we really believe hispanics are irretrievably bad, when blacks wore dapper coats and hats just a century ago? When blacks bowed to the ladies, didn’t cause trouble, and went to work just like the rest of us? What about arabs, asians, subcons, amerindians? Is there nothing culture couldn’t cure? So long as people obey the law, earn their keep, and leave us free to associate with whom we choose, what harm are they doing us? Sure, theoretically, a higher population puts a strain on public goods and resources, but without any handouts luring degenerates into the country, we can be assured they’ll always contribute more to the economy than they’ll cost.
What if we could develop some perfect government policy, some perfect set of laws, that would allow all races to coexist and even thrive in harmony? Suppose we gave pre-natal care to pregnant minorities, followed by the perfect schooling starting from age 1, insist the children be given breast feeding for the first six months, banish all possibility of drug use (singapore did it, so can we) and require babies only be born into stable married homes? Suppose we gave a citizen’s dividend to all married couples that could help pay for their health care and made corresponding laws requiring people lead healthy lives? Suppose we taught children in new, unorthodox manners that show much better results than our current ‘sit in a desk all day’ classrooms manage? Why won’t we even try? It’s heartless to simply give up on someone, simply because it would be easier on a genetically ‘fitter’ individual. That ‘fitter’ individual doesn’t exist, this one does. He’s alive, he’s suffering, and he needs our help. It’s too late to dream of an easier task with some 20% improvement due to some genetic correlation, we have a real breathing human, who like it or not is here and has to be taken care of, with the genes they like it or not have. Let’s work around it—has anyone bothered to even try?
Blacks don’t perform well in school. So change the schools to something that they perform well in. Teach them something they’re good at, or become good at teaching them. Does anyone seriously believe 2009 is the last word in education, that there is no way to improve our schools, whatsoever? That despite our lack of perfection in every other field, education is done, we’ve maximized its potential, it is just the optimal schooling experience that even Jesus has set up for babies in heaven?
Blacks have a crime problem. Well, when was there less crime? What were people doing in that age? Can we mimic that period? Can we bring back their policies? What was it? A no-nonsense enforcement policy? Higher culturual expectations and ostracism of ne’er do wells? Why can’t we bring it back? If there was any time blacks were doing less crime, we know we at least have the potential to bring it back to that level.
Voting has become a grab-bag for ethnic and special interests. Well then, when did voting work better? Was there a time when votes were limited and the results more rewarding for our republic? Could we not change voting to rest more on merit, or have some other qualifications, or change government entirely to something that might work better? If minority voting habits are a problem—change voting! Why immediately insist on going after the minority? There’s more than one way to skin a cat---and this way is more humane, which is all that matters. People come first, not projects.
Jews are defrauding us of trillions of dollars by gaming the business world. Well when were they not defrauding us? Perhaps we could change the way debt works, or perhaps the fed could be abolished, or new regulations be set so that such fraudulent practices would be illegal? America has had many recessions and the economy is a complicated business. Mistakes will be made, but there’s no need to get out the tar and feathers. Every time a crash occurs, we learn something, all we have to do is culturally apply what we’ve learned. With a proper set of laws, it will become impossible for anyone, regardless of the malice in their hearts, to steal from anyone. All it takes is a serious interest and effort in making things transparent, fair, and safe for the everyday investor.
Muslims are taught silly things in their Koran that promotes violence. Well, why don’t we teach them a different way in our schools, and show them love is always better than hate? It’s not like terrorism is a big deal, it kills fewer people than car accidents do every year. What is a big deal is giving up on millions of people, all fellow human beings, who if we tried even just a little could be shown the western cultural way. So long as muslims don’t do crime, go to work, and aren’t rioting in the streets, we can forgive each other our differences and move on! Life is too good to concentrate on what your neighbor is doing in the privacy of their homes, or what they are thinking in the privacy of their heads!
Sure diversity causes problems we wouldn’t ordinarily have. But let’s face it, so long as rich people have jobs, and poor people need them, diversity is going to happen. And more importantly, they’re already here. We can’t do anything about it now, they’ve just as much a right to live here as anyone else does. All we can do is try to make the best of it, for everyone’s sake. Are they suffering from a disease? Let’s get together and cure it. Do they have bad moral habits? Let’s get together and raise them right. Do they have a tendency to violence? Let’s teach them what is and what isn’t acceptable. Do they vote the wrong way? Let’s change government until only correct decisions are capable of being made. Do they make too little money? Let’s provide a generous citizen’s dividend that will help ends meet. After all, the rich of this country, the top 1%, earn as much as the bottom 50%! That kind of balance is disgusting, and I doubt it’s merited either. Regardless, the first few thousand dollars someone receives can buy food, clean water, a place to stay —the next few billion can only buy yachts and chandeliers--who needs it? We should be looking out for everyone, after all, we’re all in this together. A little less poverty goes a long way. People will not be as sick, if they just have a good diet and a good neighborhood--in the end it will save us money by avoiding all the complications poverty brings to people down the road. There’s so much we can do! Lots of people have good suggestions. Republicans want to be tough on crime--fine! Democrats want to provide better health care--good! Republicans want school choice--excellent! Democrats want school funding--let’s do it! What we all want is the betterment of our people’s lives. A place we can live, and our children can live, in peace and prosperity. Think for a second, what would YOU do to improve the life of EVERYONE in this country, from the most genetic superman to the lowest genetic reject? Think of that one change that would rise all boats, across the board, that you’d implement if you could. And then go do it! Make a crusade out of it. Go for it!
Do you want mothers to breast feed their children, because it rises IQ by 5 points and helps the child’s immune system forever--children of any color? How much would it hurt to change that? Let’s do it!
Do you want children as young as 1 to 5 year olds being given a healthy, nutritious diet no matter where they live? Do you want young children to receive top quality daycare that’s proven to energize and engage children’s minds? Let’s do it! How much could it cost? How much more will it cost, rather, if we DON’T do it? If we abandon these children, who in turn will someday abandon their country, and cause the chaos we so abhor?
Do you want english to be taught to all children at the time they learn it best, so we have a common language we can engage each other in, as one nation, as one people? Do you want english to be as innate to hispanics and haitians as it is to the purest boston clubhouse? Let’s legislate it! Test scores are certain to rise when hispancis aren’t busy trying to translate everything into their native tongue, before they can even address the question.
Life could be so much better, we know it can, in so many ways. Off the top of my head, I know of 30 different changes that would improve the life of every single human on earth, if only they gave it a shot. When we are so deficient as nurturers, what does nature have to do with it? Suppose we are stuck in a brace, blindfolded, our hands are tied behind our backs, and there’s a gag in our mouth. Now someone walks up and says to you: “You know why you can’t win this 100 meter dash? it’s because your genes are just too weak! If you simply had better genes, you could’ve been the winner. But now we’re carting you off to Ecuador, and good riddance!”
If only you could protest through your gag, you could tell him that the genes had nothing to do with it, it was really the blindfold, the hand tying, and the brace holding you back. And that with all those things removed, heck, you could’ve given the race quite a shot! This is how race-on-the-brains determinists are thinking, and it’s positively insane. Sure, maybe in the end they still couldn’t run as fast as a rocket. But you know what, they could run pretty damn fast. All we have to do is work together, and give it a real, honest-to-goodness shot. Until we have gotten the best out of everyone, how do we know it isn’t good enough? How do we know it isn’t wonderful? Lovable? Beautiful? Brilliant? Inspiring? Great? How do we know? How can we judge until we’ve let them bloom? There’s nothing wrong in this country that couldn’t be made better, with the very people living in it today. If we’ve done everything and made it as good as we can, and you’re still not content--well okay THEN tell us we were wrong, and we’ll admit it and apologize. Until then, taking into account the humaneness of our position, and the compassion we must all feel for our fellow man, what reason to jump the gun? I won’t question your motives or intentions, but I still can’t help but think how sad it must be to turn to violence, exclusion, and hate as the first and only recourse to every problem. If your daughter said she wasn’t going to eat the broccoli, do you get out the hammer and slug her across the head? Or do you work with her? Individuals make mistakes, societies make mistakes. Sometimes they do the wrong thing. The important thing is to love them, forgive them, and teach them a better way. Life is a process, there is no end point. If you let love enter your heart, you’ll always find a way to make up. This world is big enough for all of us, nurture is powerful enough to lift all boats, so let’s put the hammers away and give it another go, okay?
Genes have loose correlations to all sorts of things. Personality, behavior, beliefs, ideals, emotional tendencies, and of course the mother of them all IQ.
However, none of these correlations are 100%. Many are as low as 20%. What would become of a society that accepted genetic differences, good and bad, and concentrated solely on developing everyone we can to their fullest potential? For instance, suppose someone has a genetic predisposition to alcoholism. If raised correctly, and with enough force of will, this person can avoid drinking and thus never become an alcoholic. Here we have genes weaving their nefarious webs, and culture cutting right through them. How many other victories could we as a nation, and we as individuals, score over our genetic default?
Is there really no hope of progress, no chance at a better life? Are we doomed to repeat the same mistakes over and over, we as individuals and we as groups, just because we have certain tendencies, or correlations, or predispositions, towards those things? There are no 100% correlations between genes and anything else. This means nothing is decided, no one is past hope, we can always change people for the better—if only we try hard enough.
At a certain period in US history, blacks were all free, and were also committing very few crimes, they wore respectable dress, they had a solid family life, and for all intents and purposes they were completely harmless additions to our society. Take a picture of blacks in 1910, 1920, or what have you and they look just like anyone else. No government handouts were being rewarded to them, no drug gangs were infesting inner cities, nothing. The genes of the black race probably haven’t changed much in the last few generations, but their behavior certainly has. This means culture can determine everything. Who cares if blacks start from a lower base? They can still become decent fellows with good lives, perfectly integrated into our society and economy. Ditch the bad habits, relearn the lessons of the past, and blacks will be as good as new.
If even blacks can perform well, with their genetic flaws, what then of any other race? Do we really believe hispanics are irretrievably bad, when blacks wore dapper coats and hats just a century ago? When blacks bowed to the ladies, didn’t cause trouble, and went to work just like the rest of us? What about arabs, asians, subcons, amerindians? Is there nothing culture couldn’t cure? So long as people obey the law, earn their keep, and leave us free to associate with whom we choose, what harm are they doing us? Sure, theoretically, a higher population puts a strain on public goods and resources, but without any handouts luring degenerates into the country, we can be assured they’ll always contribute more to the economy than they’ll cost.
What if we could develop some perfect government policy, some perfect set of laws, that would allow all races to coexist and even thrive in harmony? Suppose we gave pre-natal care to pregnant minorities, followed by the perfect schooling starting from age 1, insist the children be given breast feeding for the first six months, banish all possibility of drug use (singapore did it, so can we) and require babies only be born into stable married homes? Suppose we gave a citizen’s dividend to all married couples that could help pay for their health care and made corresponding laws requiring people lead healthy lives? Suppose we taught children in new, unorthodox manners that show much better results than our current ‘sit in a desk all day’ classrooms manage? Why won’t we even try? It’s heartless to simply give up on someone, simply because it would be easier on a genetically ‘fitter’ individual. That ‘fitter’ individual doesn’t exist, this one does. He’s alive, he’s suffering, and he needs our help. It’s too late to dream of an easier task with some 20% improvement due to some genetic correlation, we have a real breathing human, who like it or not is here and has to be taken care of, with the genes they like it or not have. Let’s work around it—has anyone bothered to even try?
Blacks don’t perform well in school. So change the schools to something that they perform well in. Teach them something they’re good at, or become good at teaching them. Does anyone seriously believe 2009 is the last word in education, that there is no way to improve our schools, whatsoever? That despite our lack of perfection in every other field, education is done, we’ve maximized its potential, it is just the optimal schooling experience that even Jesus has set up for babies in heaven?
Blacks have a crime problem. Well, when was there less crime? What were people doing in that age? Can we mimic that period? Can we bring back their policies? What was it? A no-nonsense enforcement policy? Higher culturual expectations and ostracism of ne’er do wells? Why can’t we bring it back? If there was any time blacks were doing less crime, we know we at least have the potential to bring it back to that level.
Voting has become a grab-bag for ethnic and special interests. Well then, when did voting work better? Was there a time when votes were limited and the results more rewarding for our republic? Could we not change voting to rest more on merit, or have some other qualifications, or change government entirely to something that might work better? If minority voting habits are a problem—change voting! Why immediately insist on going after the minority? There’s more than one way to skin a cat---and this way is more humane, which is all that matters. People come first, not projects.
Jews are defrauding us of trillions of dollars by gaming the business world. Well when were they not defrauding us? Perhaps we could change the way debt works, or perhaps the fed could be abolished, or new regulations be set so that such fraudulent practices would be illegal? America has had many recessions and the economy is a complicated business. Mistakes will be made, but there’s no need to get out the tar and feathers. Every time a crash occurs, we learn something, all we have to do is culturally apply what we’ve learned. With a proper set of laws, it will become impossible for anyone, regardless of the malice in their hearts, to steal from anyone. All it takes is a serious interest and effort in making things transparent, fair, and safe for the everyday investor.
Muslims are taught silly things in their Koran that promotes violence. Well, why don’t we teach them a different way in our schools, and show them love is always better than hate? It’s not like terrorism is a big deal, it kills fewer people than car accidents do every year. What is a big deal is giving up on millions of people, all fellow human beings, who if we tried even just a little could be shown the western cultural way. So long as muslims don’t do crime, go to work, and aren’t rioting in the streets, we can forgive each other our differences and move on! Life is too good to concentrate on what your neighbor is doing in the privacy of their homes, or what they are thinking in the privacy of their heads!
Sure diversity causes problems we wouldn’t ordinarily have. But let’s face it, so long as rich people have jobs, and poor people need them, diversity is going to happen. And more importantly, they’re already here. We can’t do anything about it now, they’ve just as much a right to live here as anyone else does. All we can do is try to make the best of it, for everyone’s sake. Are they suffering from a disease? Let’s get together and cure it. Do they have bad moral habits? Let’s get together and raise them right. Do they have a tendency to violence? Let’s teach them what is and what isn’t acceptable. Do they vote the wrong way? Let’s change government until only correct decisions are capable of being made. Do they make too little money? Let’s provide a generous citizen’s dividend that will help ends meet. After all, the rich of this country, the top 1%, earn as much as the bottom 50%! That kind of balance is disgusting, and I doubt it’s merited either. Regardless, the first few thousand dollars someone receives can buy food, clean water, a place to stay —the next few billion can only buy yachts and chandeliers--who needs it? We should be looking out for everyone, after all, we’re all in this together. A little less poverty goes a long way. People will not be as sick, if they just have a good diet and a good neighborhood--in the end it will save us money by avoiding all the complications poverty brings to people down the road. There’s so much we can do! Lots of people have good suggestions. Republicans want to be tough on crime--fine! Democrats want to provide better health care--good! Republicans want school choice--excellent! Democrats want school funding--let’s do it! What we all want is the betterment of our people’s lives. A place we can live, and our children can live, in peace and prosperity. Think for a second, what would YOU do to improve the life of EVERYONE in this country, from the most genetic superman to the lowest genetic reject? Think of that one change that would rise all boats, across the board, that you’d implement if you could. And then go do it! Make a crusade out of it. Go for it!
Do you want mothers to breast feed their children, because it rises IQ by 5 points and helps the child’s immune system forever--children of any color? How much would it hurt to change that? Let’s do it!
Do you want children as young as 1 to 5 year olds being given a healthy, nutritious diet no matter where they live? Do you want young children to receive top quality daycare that’s proven to energize and engage children’s minds? Let’s do it! How much could it cost? How much more will it cost, rather, if we DON’T do it? If we abandon these children, who in turn will someday abandon their country, and cause the chaos we so abhor?
Do you want english to be taught to all children at the time they learn it best, so we have a common language we can engage each other in, as one nation, as one people? Do you want english to be as innate to hispanics and haitians as it is to the purest boston clubhouse? Let’s legislate it! Test scores are certain to rise when hispancis aren’t busy trying to translate everything into their native tongue, before they can even address the question.
Life could be so much better, we know it can, in so many ways. Off the top of my head, I know of 30 different changes that would improve the life of every single human on earth, if only they gave it a shot. When we are so deficient as nurturers, what does nature have to do with it? Suppose we are stuck in a brace, blindfolded, our hands are tied behind our backs, and there’s a gag in our mouth. Now someone walks up and says to you: “You know why you can’t win this 100 meter dash? it’s because your genes are just too weak! If you simply had better genes, you could’ve been the winner. But now we’re carting you off to Ecuador, and good riddance!”
If only you could protest through your gag, you could tell him that the genes had nothing to do with it, it was really the blindfold, the hand tying, and the brace holding you back. And that with all those things removed, heck, you could’ve given the race quite a shot! This is how race-on-the-brains determinists are thinking, and it’s positively insane. Sure, maybe in the end they still couldn’t run as fast as a rocket. But you know what, they could run pretty damn fast. All we have to do is work together, and give it a real, honest-to-goodness shot. Until we have gotten the best out of everyone, how do we know it isn’t good enough? How do we know it isn’t wonderful? Lovable? Beautiful? Brilliant? Inspiring? Great? How do we know? How can we judge until we’ve let them bloom? There’s nothing wrong in this country that couldn’t be made better, with the very people living in it today. If we’ve done everything and made it as good as we can, and you’re still not content--well okay THEN tell us we were wrong, and we’ll admit it and apologize. Until then, taking into account the humaneness of our position, and the compassion we must all feel for our fellow man, what reason to jump the gun? I won’t question your motives or intentions, but I still can’t help but think how sad it must be to turn to violence, exclusion, and hate as the first and only recourse to every problem. If your daughter said she wasn’t going to eat the broccoli, do you get out the hammer and slug her across the head? Or do you work with her? Individuals make mistakes, societies make mistakes. Sometimes they do the wrong thing. The important thing is to love them, forgive them, and teach them a better way. Life is a process, there is no end point. If you let love enter your heart, you’ll always find a way to make up. This world is big enough for all of us, nurture is powerful enough to lift all boats, so let’s put the hammers away and give it another go, okay?
Blacks Aren’t Human
Blacks Aren’t Human
January 29th, 2009
According to Rushton’s “Race, Evolution, and Behavior” fully modern homo sapiens emerged in Africa 200,000 years ago. 100,000 years ago, a small group of Africans had a sudden urge to head north. This small group inhabited the rest of the world, with minimal contact with the rest of the Africans who stayed in Africa. 40,000 years ago, the Caucasoid race broke off from the Mongoloid race.
This means the entire world outside of Africa is largely related, descended from one small tribe of perhaps a few hundred or a thousand. This tribe was obviously already unique, in that it alone had the intrepidity and determination to head north and conquer the world. We, the descendants of this unique tribe, have afterwards been evolving under extremely different, more challenging environments for the last 100,000 years apart from the African race we left behind. 100,000 years under dramatically different environments from a dramatically different founding stock is a long time. Compare it to dogs:
http://archaeology.about.com/od/domestications/qt/dogs.htm
“Dog history has been studied recently using mitochondrial DNA, which suggests that wolves and dogs split into different species around 100,000 years ago;
Another recent study suggests that the entire population of dogs today are descended from three females near China about 15,000 years ago
So, I’m going to stick my neck out and use the 13,000 year BC date as the probable date of domestication.”
This is a convenient parallel. Dogs also come from a bottleneck, they’ve also been genetically separate from wolves for 100,000 years, and they’ve also undergone different environmental pressures than their wolf counterparts. Just as the northern latitudes presented a unique environment for non-blacks to grow up in, dogs were domesticated and evolved towards suiting human needs instead of wolf needs. No one on earth says dogs and wolves are the same species, even though it is possible for dogs to mate with wolves and have fertile offspring. The genetic differences are vast enough, the phenotypic differences in looks, behavior, and personality are great enough, that everyone instinctively recognizes dogs and wolves are different species now.
Why then are blacks considered human? Why are blacks and non-blacks considered part of the same species? We could not look more different, act more different, or have more different personalities than them. There is a vast genetic divergence between blacks and non-blacks dating back 100,000 years. And even though blacks and non-blacks can have fertile offspring, biologically that has never been used as the exclusive standard for whether you belong to the same species or not.
Phenotypic Variations between Blacks and Non-blacks:
Blacks have wide noses, kinky hair, black skin, high waist-to-hip ratios, prognathic jaws, long arms, and soulless, vacant eyes. Everything about them is ugly.
Blacks have the lowest IQ in the world. (ignoring the equally disgusting and black-skinned australian aborigines for convenience’s sake.) The bushmen clock in at around 50 IQ, the average bantu achieves the mentally retarded level of 70 IQ, and the highly cultivated, well fed, well cared for, partially white African-Americans reach 85 IQ. IQ has an enormous impact on lifestyle, achievement, and behavior. IQ correlates to poverty, crime, mortality, and broken homes on one side — and education, wealth, human accomplishment, long life and stable homes on the other. According to “IQ and the Wealth of Nations,” a country must have a minimum average IQ of 90 to run a technological civilization. It is not a far cry to say it is IQ that makes humans better than the animals, and it is IQ that makes some humans better than other humans.
That’s not all though. Blacks are unique in that when we arrived, they had no written language, no wheel, no architectural works, nothing at all that would indicate they live a human existence. Whereas literature and palaces and cities existed in almost every corner of the earth, from the Incas to the Indians to the Persians to the Chinese to Stonehenge to Ankar Wat in Cambodia — nothing existed in Africa. For the past 100,000 years non-blacks have been spreading across the globe, building pyramids and cities, developing new technology, domesticating animals and crops, covering themselves in finely decorated clothing, and living essentially human lives. Blacks, meanwhile, stayed nearly naked, self-mutilating, technology-less, with no domesticated animals, no written language, no wheel, no stone buildings, no metalworking, nothing.
Virtually every other non-black group came up with an admirable or at least interesting religion or philosophy which was recorded and taught to a priesthood. Indians had the Vedas and the Upanishads, Chinese had Confucianism, Daoism, and various sects of Buddhism. Europeans had Virgil, Horace, and Homer to write down their pagan religion, with Plato, Aristotle, and numberless other greats to record their philosophy. Even the Aztecs had a corpus of literature which was, unfortunately, burnt and destroyed by the Spanish invaders. Shintoism was developed in Japan, the epic of Gilgamesh was recorded in ancient Babylonian times, and Egypt authored the Book of the Dead. Only black Africa (and assorted primitives in australasia) hadn’t recorded or created any official religion or philosophy. Blacks still rely on voodoo, witchcraft, black magic, and animism with no particular pantheon of Gods, no priesthood, no anything that could develop them past superstition and barbarism.
Today it is questionable what Blacks could achieve on their own, without the intervention of others giving to them all the things they could never produce or maintain themselves. Though we see blacks walking around in business suits, speaking English, shooting guns, and making use of all sorts of non-black generated goods and services and inventions and ideas and discoveries — none of them originate from the black man. Without the continuous intervention of charity into Black Africa, it’s unknown whether they could even maintain what they have, or if they would simply regress back to mud huts the moment we left. All current black civilization is in fact transplanted non-black civilization. There is not as yet a single black civilization on Earth that has independently developed and maintained its own technological and philosophical way of life. No blacks have won any nobel prizes in the hard sciences, fields medals, or gotten any spot on a list of Human Accomplishment that would represent some major scientific or technological advancement for the world.
Geography can be no excuse, because blacks today live all across the world. Blacks in France, the UK, and the USA are given preferential treatment and access to college educations, and yet they still produce nothing. At the same time, whites who lived in South Africa and Zimbabwe made them into decent, first world nations without a problem. There is nothing about the African continent inimical to modern life, it is simply the fact that it is populated by blacks.
Nor can some strange combination of bad luck and being separate from other civilizations explain black underperformance. After all, blacks have been connected to the outside world since the 1400’s. They have had centuries to modernize and improve themselves in Africa with full access to modern knowledge and technology. In contrast, it took Japan about twenty years to modernize from a feudal samurai culture to a fully modern industrial state which then took on and defeated Russia in 1900. Blacks have had centuries in the USA to do all sorts of human activities, immersed in white culture, knowledge, and technology. Instead all they do is riot, rape, steal, sell drugs, and demand more handouts from the government. Germany recovered from WWII in just ten years, becoming yet again a prosperous, powerful, and leading-edge modern civilization. Africans meanwhile cannot recover from ‘colonization,’ ’slavery,’ or ‘discrimination’ after centuries. Haiti has been an all-black, independent, free state since the Napoleonic wars, 200 years ago. Even so, its lifestyle and standard of living perfectly matches that of darkest Africa. In those 200 years it hasn’t progressed an inch. In fact it has probably regressed since that time. Their neighbors in the dominican republic have immensely better statistics than them in all fields. Instead of a failed state, the dominican republic takes care of its people, has a working government, and doesn’t need charity. The difference? Their population is non-black. All of the old, tired excuses are refuted by geography and history.
The black murder rate is 9 times that of the white/hispanic (combined!) murder rate. It is 36 times as high as the asian murder rate. Blacks are the majority of AIDS cases and all other STDs, their STD rates are completely out of proportion to all other groups. Even homosexuals have a hard time keeping up with the black STD rates. No ordinary healthy human has the sexual habits of the black race. Whereas every other people on earth developed a family structure, blacks still roam around aimlessly screwing everyone they meet and never staying to raise the child. 70% of black children in the USA are illegitimate. In Africa, women largely do all the work and raise the kids while the men commit crime or sit around chewing leaves or smoking something. Domestic violence among blacks is atrocious. Rape is endemic. The human race does not act like this, their morals and habits are completely different.
Good things can be said of virtually every group or civilization on earth. This is unsurprising, given the fact that everyone on earth is descended from the same small tribe that left africa 100,000 years ago. East Asians are such decent, advanced people they are comparable to whites. Unsurprisingly, they only diverged from the White race 40,000 years ago. There is only one group nothing good can be said about, there is only one group completely unrelated to the rest of the human race, and that is the black African. There is enough genetic variation between blacks and non-blacks that any objective scientist, classifying us like they would classify various animal species, would label us different species. On one side humans, on the other blacks. There is enough phenotypic, common sense variation, that again it is an insult to categorize blacks among the human race. They are nothing like us and they never will be, they are worse in every way. Call them orcs, or trolls, devils, or whatever you like–they are not human.
January 29th, 2009
According to Rushton’s “Race, Evolution, and Behavior” fully modern homo sapiens emerged in Africa 200,000 years ago. 100,000 years ago, a small group of Africans had a sudden urge to head north. This small group inhabited the rest of the world, with minimal contact with the rest of the Africans who stayed in Africa. 40,000 years ago, the Caucasoid race broke off from the Mongoloid race.
This means the entire world outside of Africa is largely related, descended from one small tribe of perhaps a few hundred or a thousand. This tribe was obviously already unique, in that it alone had the intrepidity and determination to head north and conquer the world. We, the descendants of this unique tribe, have afterwards been evolving under extremely different, more challenging environments for the last 100,000 years apart from the African race we left behind. 100,000 years under dramatically different environments from a dramatically different founding stock is a long time. Compare it to dogs:
http://archaeology.about.com/od/domestications/qt/dogs.htm
“Dog history has been studied recently using mitochondrial DNA, which suggests that wolves and dogs split into different species around 100,000 years ago;
Another recent study suggests that the entire population of dogs today are descended from three females near China about 15,000 years ago
So, I’m going to stick my neck out and use the 13,000 year BC date as the probable date of domestication.”
This is a convenient parallel. Dogs also come from a bottleneck, they’ve also been genetically separate from wolves for 100,000 years, and they’ve also undergone different environmental pressures than their wolf counterparts. Just as the northern latitudes presented a unique environment for non-blacks to grow up in, dogs were domesticated and evolved towards suiting human needs instead of wolf needs. No one on earth says dogs and wolves are the same species, even though it is possible for dogs to mate with wolves and have fertile offspring. The genetic differences are vast enough, the phenotypic differences in looks, behavior, and personality are great enough, that everyone instinctively recognizes dogs and wolves are different species now.
Why then are blacks considered human? Why are blacks and non-blacks considered part of the same species? We could not look more different, act more different, or have more different personalities than them. There is a vast genetic divergence between blacks and non-blacks dating back 100,000 years. And even though blacks and non-blacks can have fertile offspring, biologically that has never been used as the exclusive standard for whether you belong to the same species or not.
Phenotypic Variations between Blacks and Non-blacks:
Blacks have wide noses, kinky hair, black skin, high waist-to-hip ratios, prognathic jaws, long arms, and soulless, vacant eyes. Everything about them is ugly.
Blacks have the lowest IQ in the world. (ignoring the equally disgusting and black-skinned australian aborigines for convenience’s sake.) The bushmen clock in at around 50 IQ, the average bantu achieves the mentally retarded level of 70 IQ, and the highly cultivated, well fed, well cared for, partially white African-Americans reach 85 IQ. IQ has an enormous impact on lifestyle, achievement, and behavior. IQ correlates to poverty, crime, mortality, and broken homes on one side — and education, wealth, human accomplishment, long life and stable homes on the other. According to “IQ and the Wealth of Nations,” a country must have a minimum average IQ of 90 to run a technological civilization. It is not a far cry to say it is IQ that makes humans better than the animals, and it is IQ that makes some humans better than other humans.
That’s not all though. Blacks are unique in that when we arrived, they had no written language, no wheel, no architectural works, nothing at all that would indicate they live a human existence. Whereas literature and palaces and cities existed in almost every corner of the earth, from the Incas to the Indians to the Persians to the Chinese to Stonehenge to Ankar Wat in Cambodia — nothing existed in Africa. For the past 100,000 years non-blacks have been spreading across the globe, building pyramids and cities, developing new technology, domesticating animals and crops, covering themselves in finely decorated clothing, and living essentially human lives. Blacks, meanwhile, stayed nearly naked, self-mutilating, technology-less, with no domesticated animals, no written language, no wheel, no stone buildings, no metalworking, nothing.
Virtually every other non-black group came up with an admirable or at least interesting religion or philosophy which was recorded and taught to a priesthood. Indians had the Vedas and the Upanishads, Chinese had Confucianism, Daoism, and various sects of Buddhism. Europeans had Virgil, Horace, and Homer to write down their pagan religion, with Plato, Aristotle, and numberless other greats to record their philosophy. Even the Aztecs had a corpus of literature which was, unfortunately, burnt and destroyed by the Spanish invaders. Shintoism was developed in Japan, the epic of Gilgamesh was recorded in ancient Babylonian times, and Egypt authored the Book of the Dead. Only black Africa (and assorted primitives in australasia) hadn’t recorded or created any official religion or philosophy. Blacks still rely on voodoo, witchcraft, black magic, and animism with no particular pantheon of Gods, no priesthood, no anything that could develop them past superstition and barbarism.
Today it is questionable what Blacks could achieve on their own, without the intervention of others giving to them all the things they could never produce or maintain themselves. Though we see blacks walking around in business suits, speaking English, shooting guns, and making use of all sorts of non-black generated goods and services and inventions and ideas and discoveries — none of them originate from the black man. Without the continuous intervention of charity into Black Africa, it’s unknown whether they could even maintain what they have, or if they would simply regress back to mud huts the moment we left. All current black civilization is in fact transplanted non-black civilization. There is not as yet a single black civilization on Earth that has independently developed and maintained its own technological and philosophical way of life. No blacks have won any nobel prizes in the hard sciences, fields medals, or gotten any spot on a list of Human Accomplishment that would represent some major scientific or technological advancement for the world.
Geography can be no excuse, because blacks today live all across the world. Blacks in France, the UK, and the USA are given preferential treatment and access to college educations, and yet they still produce nothing. At the same time, whites who lived in South Africa and Zimbabwe made them into decent, first world nations without a problem. There is nothing about the African continent inimical to modern life, it is simply the fact that it is populated by blacks.
Nor can some strange combination of bad luck and being separate from other civilizations explain black underperformance. After all, blacks have been connected to the outside world since the 1400’s. They have had centuries to modernize and improve themselves in Africa with full access to modern knowledge and technology. In contrast, it took Japan about twenty years to modernize from a feudal samurai culture to a fully modern industrial state which then took on and defeated Russia in 1900. Blacks have had centuries in the USA to do all sorts of human activities, immersed in white culture, knowledge, and technology. Instead all they do is riot, rape, steal, sell drugs, and demand more handouts from the government. Germany recovered from WWII in just ten years, becoming yet again a prosperous, powerful, and leading-edge modern civilization. Africans meanwhile cannot recover from ‘colonization,’ ’slavery,’ or ‘discrimination’ after centuries. Haiti has been an all-black, independent, free state since the Napoleonic wars, 200 years ago. Even so, its lifestyle and standard of living perfectly matches that of darkest Africa. In those 200 years it hasn’t progressed an inch. In fact it has probably regressed since that time. Their neighbors in the dominican republic have immensely better statistics than them in all fields. Instead of a failed state, the dominican republic takes care of its people, has a working government, and doesn’t need charity. The difference? Their population is non-black. All of the old, tired excuses are refuted by geography and history.
The black murder rate is 9 times that of the white/hispanic (combined!) murder rate. It is 36 times as high as the asian murder rate. Blacks are the majority of AIDS cases and all other STDs, their STD rates are completely out of proportion to all other groups. Even homosexuals have a hard time keeping up with the black STD rates. No ordinary healthy human has the sexual habits of the black race. Whereas every other people on earth developed a family structure, blacks still roam around aimlessly screwing everyone they meet and never staying to raise the child. 70% of black children in the USA are illegitimate. In Africa, women largely do all the work and raise the kids while the men commit crime or sit around chewing leaves or smoking something. Domestic violence among blacks is atrocious. Rape is endemic. The human race does not act like this, their morals and habits are completely different.
Good things can be said of virtually every group or civilization on earth. This is unsurprising, given the fact that everyone on earth is descended from the same small tribe that left africa 100,000 years ago. East Asians are such decent, advanced people they are comparable to whites. Unsurprisingly, they only diverged from the White race 40,000 years ago. There is only one group nothing good can be said about, there is only one group completely unrelated to the rest of the human race, and that is the black African. There is enough genetic variation between blacks and non-blacks that any objective scientist, classifying us like they would classify various animal species, would label us different species. On one side humans, on the other blacks. There is enough phenotypic, common sense variation, that again it is an insult to categorize blacks among the human race. They are nothing like us and they never will be, they are worse in every way. Call them orcs, or trolls, devils, or whatever you like–they are not human.
Argue the Facts First, Opinions Second:
Argue the Facts First, Opinions Second:
January 31st, 2009
Here is my problem with arguing with anyone, about anything:
If we don’t share the same knowledge of facts, we’ll never agree about our opinions. And if, miraculously, our opinions do agree but for entirely different reasons, I’m still not happy because I think their reasons for agreeing are disagreeable. I have found it impossible to argue my beliefs with friends and family, because they are so factually ignorant that everything I say will sound crazy or evil to them. How can you have a genuine argument or debate with someone, when the other side doesn’t know anything, and thus no logical reasoning from that knowledgable base can be done?
Here’s a simple fact, women on average score 4 IQ points lower than men. This has profound implications. Is this perhaps why women aren’t as highly represented on CEO boards, elite positions, and nobel prizes? Should we really give women equal say in politics–was there a reason why we never used to? Perhaps women aren’t as suited as men are at making money and should stay at home with the kids, a simple job they’re bio-engineered for?
I’m not going to argue one position or another, but I will make this argument: Until everyone learns the fact that women on average have a lower IQ than men, we can never have a reasonable discussion about these questions. Anyone who suggests the above will be called all sorts of names, thrown out of the room, and likely fired from his job and divorced by his wife. Why? Because people have become so indoctrinated, so brainwashed, that no one can speak to them on the basis of the facts, instead of the lies they have been told since childhood. I am fine with arguing with people who possess the same facts but come to different interpretations thereof. I am fine with arguing with people who see the same thing and come to a different conclusion. There is a wonderful difference between these sorts of arguments, and the arguments of today. In an argument where both people know the facts, it is easy to sympathize and understand the other person’s point of view. It is easy to see that people are well intentioned, honest, and good people underneath who are capable of changing their mind if further proof were provided. When people are operating from completely different sets of facts, it is impossible to sympathize or understand their point of view. In an honest world that starts with the truth and then works from there, you have a sort of socratic philosophy club. Friends get together, discuss right and wrong, have dinner and go home, delighted with what they’ve shared. In a dishonest world where the truth is suppressed and heresy becomes a crime, mutual hostility and demonization sets in. There is no possibility of agreement, no possibility of compromise, it is war to the bitter end. They will hate you, consider you the ultimate evil, do anything to shut you up. You, meanwhile, will despise them, consider them the ultimate evil, and would do anything to overthrow their tyrannical rule. What a difference mutual knowledge of the facts makes!
This is why a rally with a bunch of flags shouting slogans as people march down the streets, is such a pointless, self-defeating effort. You are trying to spread your opinions, but not your facts! No one will ever spontaneously hear “White pride!” and think “Hey, that sounds like a good idea!” and jump into the crowd. They have to know where we are coming from, how we got to our views, why they should feel the same way.
Even worse if if people have come to our views Without any basis in fact. If someone asks you, “why do you hate black people so much?” And you tell them, “I don’t know, I have no reason to, I just woke up one day and realized–I hate black people. I hate them so much I want to kill them. And I’ve been telling other people we should kill black people ever since.” Who are you going to convert???? We have to have full mastery of the facts, we need statistics dripping off our fingertips. We need sources, books, articles, links, the whole shebang, and we need to reserve our opinions until they’re ready to hear it. It’s a lot easier to discuss facts with people who know you’re a decent, good person ahead of time. Then it’s a lot easier to discuss opinions with people who know the same facts you do. Inspire trust through personal conduct, inspire good sense through teaching of the facts, inspire pro-white opinions by reasoning from the facts.
Here’s a short list of books everyone should read before they go proselytyzing to the masses. I’ll confess that I haven’t read them all myself, but I’m working on it:
Human Accomplishment by Charles Murray. The Bell Curve by Charles Murray. Race, Evolution, and Behavior by Rushton. IQ and the Wealth of Nations/IQ and Global Ineqaulity by Lynn and Vanahu. Understanding Human History by Hart. The Camp of the Saints by Raspaille. Ethnic Genetic Interests by Salter.
If you wish people to learn about the threat of Islam, read Prophet of Doom by Craig Winn.
If you want to attack the jews, read Culture of Critique by Kevin Macdonald, Jewish Supremacism by David Duke, or Dissecting the Holocaust by Germar Rudolf.
Encourage other people to read the same books you have, give them short summaries of the author’s views in the most non-threatening manner, and be enthusiastic about how much you learned from it. Offer to read books from the other side that argue the opposite point of view that they adhere to, trade time for each other where you can get to know each other’s facts. Listen to their points and give them credit where they’re due. Teach facts first, opinions later. I suspect this is the correct way to indoctrinate our kids too. Encourage them to read these books, talk with them about it after they’re done, and see if you can give them a pro-white viewpoint that will help them throughout their lives. If nothing else, you don’t want your daughter dating a black guy who will likely abuse her, give her an STD, get her pregnant and leave, etc.
If there are any other books that are vital to the cause, please suggest them to me! If you’re spreading the pro-white message without any facts or books, please take the time to read them first. If each one of us converts even one other person in our lives, and they go on to convert just one other person themselves, soon enough the whole world would agree with us. But what that means is we can’t burn bridges and just agree to hate the entire world in a fump. We’ve got to engage with people, we’ve got to argue with them, and it’s got to be in a Socratic, polite, and friendly way. Once they know the facts, they’ll sympathize with us even if they don’t agree. They’ll go easier on us, and that’s already a win.
January 31st, 2009
Here is my problem with arguing with anyone, about anything:
If we don’t share the same knowledge of facts, we’ll never agree about our opinions. And if, miraculously, our opinions do agree but for entirely different reasons, I’m still not happy because I think their reasons for agreeing are disagreeable. I have found it impossible to argue my beliefs with friends and family, because they are so factually ignorant that everything I say will sound crazy or evil to them. How can you have a genuine argument or debate with someone, when the other side doesn’t know anything, and thus no logical reasoning from that knowledgable base can be done?
Here’s a simple fact, women on average score 4 IQ points lower than men. This has profound implications. Is this perhaps why women aren’t as highly represented on CEO boards, elite positions, and nobel prizes? Should we really give women equal say in politics–was there a reason why we never used to? Perhaps women aren’t as suited as men are at making money and should stay at home with the kids, a simple job they’re bio-engineered for?
I’m not going to argue one position or another, but I will make this argument: Until everyone learns the fact that women on average have a lower IQ than men, we can never have a reasonable discussion about these questions. Anyone who suggests the above will be called all sorts of names, thrown out of the room, and likely fired from his job and divorced by his wife. Why? Because people have become so indoctrinated, so brainwashed, that no one can speak to them on the basis of the facts, instead of the lies they have been told since childhood. I am fine with arguing with people who possess the same facts but come to different interpretations thereof. I am fine with arguing with people who see the same thing and come to a different conclusion. There is a wonderful difference between these sorts of arguments, and the arguments of today. In an argument where both people know the facts, it is easy to sympathize and understand the other person’s point of view. It is easy to see that people are well intentioned, honest, and good people underneath who are capable of changing their mind if further proof were provided. When people are operating from completely different sets of facts, it is impossible to sympathize or understand their point of view. In an honest world that starts with the truth and then works from there, you have a sort of socratic philosophy club. Friends get together, discuss right and wrong, have dinner and go home, delighted with what they’ve shared. In a dishonest world where the truth is suppressed and heresy becomes a crime, mutual hostility and demonization sets in. There is no possibility of agreement, no possibility of compromise, it is war to the bitter end. They will hate you, consider you the ultimate evil, do anything to shut you up. You, meanwhile, will despise them, consider them the ultimate evil, and would do anything to overthrow their tyrannical rule. What a difference mutual knowledge of the facts makes!
This is why a rally with a bunch of flags shouting slogans as people march down the streets, is such a pointless, self-defeating effort. You are trying to spread your opinions, but not your facts! No one will ever spontaneously hear “White pride!” and think “Hey, that sounds like a good idea!” and jump into the crowd. They have to know where we are coming from, how we got to our views, why they should feel the same way.
Even worse if if people have come to our views Without any basis in fact. If someone asks you, “why do you hate black people so much?” And you tell them, “I don’t know, I have no reason to, I just woke up one day and realized–I hate black people. I hate them so much I want to kill them. And I’ve been telling other people we should kill black people ever since.” Who are you going to convert???? We have to have full mastery of the facts, we need statistics dripping off our fingertips. We need sources, books, articles, links, the whole shebang, and we need to reserve our opinions until they’re ready to hear it. It’s a lot easier to discuss facts with people who know you’re a decent, good person ahead of time. Then it’s a lot easier to discuss opinions with people who know the same facts you do. Inspire trust through personal conduct, inspire good sense through teaching of the facts, inspire pro-white opinions by reasoning from the facts.
Here’s a short list of books everyone should read before they go proselytyzing to the masses. I’ll confess that I haven’t read them all myself, but I’m working on it:
Human Accomplishment by Charles Murray. The Bell Curve by Charles Murray. Race, Evolution, and Behavior by Rushton. IQ and the Wealth of Nations/IQ and Global Ineqaulity by Lynn and Vanahu. Understanding Human History by Hart. The Camp of the Saints by Raspaille. Ethnic Genetic Interests by Salter.
If you wish people to learn about the threat of Islam, read Prophet of Doom by Craig Winn.
If you want to attack the jews, read Culture of Critique by Kevin Macdonald, Jewish Supremacism by David Duke, or Dissecting the Holocaust by Germar Rudolf.
Encourage other people to read the same books you have, give them short summaries of the author’s views in the most non-threatening manner, and be enthusiastic about how much you learned from it. Offer to read books from the other side that argue the opposite point of view that they adhere to, trade time for each other where you can get to know each other’s facts. Listen to their points and give them credit where they’re due. Teach facts first, opinions later. I suspect this is the correct way to indoctrinate our kids too. Encourage them to read these books, talk with them about it after they’re done, and see if you can give them a pro-white viewpoint that will help them throughout their lives. If nothing else, you don’t want your daughter dating a black guy who will likely abuse her, give her an STD, get her pregnant and leave, etc.
If there are any other books that are vital to the cause, please suggest them to me! If you’re spreading the pro-white message without any facts or books, please take the time to read them first. If each one of us converts even one other person in our lives, and they go on to convert just one other person themselves, soon enough the whole world would agree with us. But what that means is we can’t burn bridges and just agree to hate the entire world in a fump. We’ve got to engage with people, we’ve got to argue with them, and it’s got to be in a Socratic, polite, and friendly way. Once they know the facts, they’ll sympathize with us even if they don’t agree. They’ll go easier on us, and that’s already a win.
Truth Spares No One
Truth Spares No One
February 3rd, 2009
‘There is not a truth existing that I fear or would wish unknown to the whole world.’ — Thomas Jefferson.
There are two types of people on earth. Those willing to accept the verdict of truth, regardless of how it reflects on them personally, or their pet causes, or how uncomfortable it might be; and those who don’t.
If you adopt only those truths which suit you, while denying those truths which you find distasteful, like some sort of chinese menu, you are a coward, a hypocrite, and a cur.
Race realism has a wonderful purpose. Its purpose is to shatter people’s illusions and force people to accept the truth through continuous presenting of evidence, science, genetics, history, geography, the news, whatever reveals the essence of racial differences that so invalidate the fantasy world of equalitarians. But race realism does not exist to serve whites, it exists to serve truth. If Jews are found to be smarter than whites, then race realism requires we accept that. If East Asians are found to be less criminal, have fewer illegitimate children, or a lower divorce rate, race realism requires we accept that. If blacks have bigger dicks and can sprint fast, race realism requires we accept that.
Race realism is a tiny subset of the truth that exists about this world. There is plenty of truth out there. Evolution is real, religion is false, gender matters, homosexuals are mentally ill, HIV causes AIDS, the free market is the best generator of wealth, democracy is fundamentally flawed, divorce causes lasting harm to kids, and star trek sucks compared to star wars.
People who wrap themselves in their pet causes and start clamoring on about how offended they are, how insufferable those who question their delusions are, how everyone on earth has to cater to them and never speak ill of anything they want, are no better than blacks insisting they’re equal and they built the pyramids or invented the refrigerator. Either people cleave to the truth or wrap themselves up in a lie that becomes the basis of their self-worth, and rise or fall on the basis of how many people are forced to acknowledge this lie. The problem with this is, for every person who gets the glowy satisfaction of having some self-satisfying lie told to him or her, there is another person humiliated and killed inside for having to speak a lie.
Solzhenitsyn lived through the gulag archipelago and came out the other side with this fundamental lesson: Live not by lies.
The cold could not break a person, starvation could not break a person, sleeplessness could not break a person, but once you could get them to tell a lie, they were lost. From there on, they could take no pride in themselves, they could not stand up for anything, they knew in their hearts they would buckle next time too. There is nothing more harmful to the human heart than knowing something is a lie, but having to say it’s true. And yet every day people heedlessly, selfishly, callously, demand dozens of lies be told about them, about their group, about their pet cause, to soothe their ego. Unthinkingly, these soul harvesters go around humiliating and defiling everyone they meet, demanding no one notice the Emperor Has No Clothes. You don’t deserve such tribute, no one does. No one deserves to be told lies just so they can feel good. Requiring others to lie about you, or your group, or your pet cause, is a slavery deeper than any whip or collar. It is enslaving even the inner conscience of man. It is making a man acknowledge he is a dog, which no amount of treating someone like a dog could do!
The Soviet Union was largely an all-white nation, but it was still hell on earth. Why? Because everyone was forced to mouth lies. You could not even speak your heart amidst friends or family. Any of them could be spies, informers, traitors. You could never, ever know. The furnace of your true mind and feelings circulated round and round your soul like a pressurised volcano, but it could never come forth! It could never be expressed! You could never be yourself! Exist! Live!
Ayn Rand aptly described the Soviet Union in We the Living: “In a totalitarian world, you can either kill yourself, kill your mind, or leave.” Enduring the hell of lies is impossible. One or another part of you is lost forever. Nor was she grandstanding, look at Russia today! The majority of children are aborted, alcoholism has taken the men to third world life expectancy, despair and depopulation hangs over people like the ghost of christmas past. What horrible tragedy must occur to make people kill their babies, kill themselves, kill their mental faculties with alcohol and drugs, abandon all hope and all wish to live? Simple–communism required people to say nothing but lies for the last 70 years. God help such a nation! God help such a soul!
So no, we can not accept ’some’ lies for the sake of civility, or machiavellan policy, or any other excuse. Life without truth is worthless. Never ask that of anyone.
February 3rd, 2009
‘There is not a truth existing that I fear or would wish unknown to the whole world.’ — Thomas Jefferson.
There are two types of people on earth. Those willing to accept the verdict of truth, regardless of how it reflects on them personally, or their pet causes, or how uncomfortable it might be; and those who don’t.
If you adopt only those truths which suit you, while denying those truths which you find distasteful, like some sort of chinese menu, you are a coward, a hypocrite, and a cur.
Race realism has a wonderful purpose. Its purpose is to shatter people’s illusions and force people to accept the truth through continuous presenting of evidence, science, genetics, history, geography, the news, whatever reveals the essence of racial differences that so invalidate the fantasy world of equalitarians. But race realism does not exist to serve whites, it exists to serve truth. If Jews are found to be smarter than whites, then race realism requires we accept that. If East Asians are found to be less criminal, have fewer illegitimate children, or a lower divorce rate, race realism requires we accept that. If blacks have bigger dicks and can sprint fast, race realism requires we accept that.
Race realism is a tiny subset of the truth that exists about this world. There is plenty of truth out there. Evolution is real, religion is false, gender matters, homosexuals are mentally ill, HIV causes AIDS, the free market is the best generator of wealth, democracy is fundamentally flawed, divorce causes lasting harm to kids, and star trek sucks compared to star wars.
People who wrap themselves in their pet causes and start clamoring on about how offended they are, how insufferable those who question their delusions are, how everyone on earth has to cater to them and never speak ill of anything they want, are no better than blacks insisting they’re equal and they built the pyramids or invented the refrigerator. Either people cleave to the truth or wrap themselves up in a lie that becomes the basis of their self-worth, and rise or fall on the basis of how many people are forced to acknowledge this lie. The problem with this is, for every person who gets the glowy satisfaction of having some self-satisfying lie told to him or her, there is another person humiliated and killed inside for having to speak a lie.
Solzhenitsyn lived through the gulag archipelago and came out the other side with this fundamental lesson: Live not by lies.
The cold could not break a person, starvation could not break a person, sleeplessness could not break a person, but once you could get them to tell a lie, they were lost. From there on, they could take no pride in themselves, they could not stand up for anything, they knew in their hearts they would buckle next time too. There is nothing more harmful to the human heart than knowing something is a lie, but having to say it’s true. And yet every day people heedlessly, selfishly, callously, demand dozens of lies be told about them, about their group, about their pet cause, to soothe their ego. Unthinkingly, these soul harvesters go around humiliating and defiling everyone they meet, demanding no one notice the Emperor Has No Clothes. You don’t deserve such tribute, no one does. No one deserves to be told lies just so they can feel good. Requiring others to lie about you, or your group, or your pet cause, is a slavery deeper than any whip or collar. It is enslaving even the inner conscience of man. It is making a man acknowledge he is a dog, which no amount of treating someone like a dog could do!
The Soviet Union was largely an all-white nation, but it was still hell on earth. Why? Because everyone was forced to mouth lies. You could not even speak your heart amidst friends or family. Any of them could be spies, informers, traitors. You could never, ever know. The furnace of your true mind and feelings circulated round and round your soul like a pressurised volcano, but it could never come forth! It could never be expressed! You could never be yourself! Exist! Live!
Ayn Rand aptly described the Soviet Union in We the Living: “In a totalitarian world, you can either kill yourself, kill your mind, or leave.” Enduring the hell of lies is impossible. One or another part of you is lost forever. Nor was she grandstanding, look at Russia today! The majority of children are aborted, alcoholism has taken the men to third world life expectancy, despair and depopulation hangs over people like the ghost of christmas past. What horrible tragedy must occur to make people kill their babies, kill themselves, kill their mental faculties with alcohol and drugs, abandon all hope and all wish to live? Simple–communism required people to say nothing but lies for the last 70 years. God help such a nation! God help such a soul!
So no, we can not accept ’some’ lies for the sake of civility, or machiavellan policy, or any other excuse. Life without truth is worthless. Never ask that of anyone.
Superior vs. Inferior
Superior vs. Inferior
February 8th, 2009(Disclaimer: This post is poetic and metaphorical, the truth is figurative not literal, and all the stronger therefore, I hope, for those with eyes to see.)
In the great chain of being, there is a scale of value starting from empty space all the way up to God. The relationships between these objects is one of inferiority and superiority. It is right that the superior supplant the inferior, but wrong for the inferior to supplant the superior. The other model, that everything and everyone is equal, is the great evil that stalks our world. As a rebellion against God’s naturally ordained order, God’s great chain of being, it is best labeled as Satan. It’s followers, Satanists.
Here is a rough example of the Great Chain of Being (a belief that the healthy Europe of the past universally held) Vacuum <>level all distinction by equating himself to something he was not. Everyone else who attempts to disturb the natural order of God’s hierarchy is following in Satan’s footsteps. Environmentalists who claim trees or animals deserve the same rights as humans. Liberals who ‘deconstruct’ heroes and ridicule holiness or virtue, trying to drag great men onto the same level as mediocrity, liberals who make excuses for losers, praise them as somehow great, or shift the blame on everyone else so that their loser-hood is somehow to our blame and their credit, liberals who deny there is such a thing as Good and Evil, Right and Wrong, Virtuous and Vicious, Admirable and Despicable, Beautiful and Ugly, True and False — the one thing connecting all their views, the one common pattern behind all their beliefs (environmentalism, subjectivism, relativism, feminism, GBLT, anti-racism, victimology, communism) is the wish to level all distinctions, to negate all measurements, to annihilate value itself so that people can stay equal — ie so that the great chain of being can become all mixed together into a giant ball of chaos, disorder, and devolution. Their goal is captured in this poem:
The Second Coming (Yeats):
“TURNING and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.”
They are Satanic, their wish is pure evil. Never before has an army’s battlecry been: “Let God be unseated by his Angels, let Saints storm heaven’s door, let Humans desecrate their saints, let Animals devour mankind, let Plants poison the animals, let plague wither all plants, let vacuum tear apart the rocks!” But this is the goal of liberalism, what else can it be? If nothing is true, if there is no such thing as inferior or superior beings, if we are all equal, if no judgments can ever be made about anything, if there is no objective scale of value we can test things by, what else but the utter rejection of existence? For instance, if nothing and no one is better or worse, then why strive to become anything? Whether you are rich or poor, honest or dishonest, clean or filthy, productive or parasitic, there will be some liberal telling you it’s okay, that you’re just as good as anyone else, that it doesn’t matter because in your heart, you’re special just like everyone else. In this world the worse you become the greater your rewards. The better you become, the harsher the penalties. This is Satan’s dream come true, the good is bad, the bad is good, and everything is mixed up together. People are terrified of the most rudimentary judgments, classifications, or preferences. And yet, just a hundred years ago, ‘discrimination’ was praised as a virtue. It meant you had good taste, that you could tell between refined and vulgar, good and bad.
The battlecry of the army of righteousness is simple: “Let the superior supplant the inferior, let the inferior never supplant the superior!” I want vacuum to become rocks, I want rocks to become plants, I want plants to become animals, I want animals to become humans, I want humans to become saints, I want saints to become angels, and I want angels to become God. This upward aspiration, this uplifting, updwelling beatitude of life’s progress has gone on for billions of years. It has been the holy hymn of the universe, of all inanimate matter and all living things, up to this day. It has been the yearning of every last atom to combine with some other and become a little larger, a little more complex, a little more alive, a little more awake. And up until this moment, it has been the desire of every last human to perfect themselves, to become civilized, to train their minds, to learn from and emulate their heroes and saints, to purify their spirits, to enlarge their horizons, to evolve their faculties–this ever upward, promethian spirit that started when the first three quarks got together and continues every time a newborn is brought mewling into this world, clad in infinite potential, unscarred by all the previous trials and tribulations of time.
Superior people are defined by their virtues. They are brilliant, beautiful, courageous, honorable, honest, kind, just, and faithful. People like this are better than the stupid, ugly, cowardly, shiftless, lying, cruel, thieving and treacherous. They don’t deserve equal treatment, equal reproductive success, equal quality of life, equal admiration, equal rights, or equal anything else. They deserve to be supplanted by the better people, to be driven off, to be destroyed, to be replaced with a cleansing flame that devours the den of inequity their presence stained God’s green earth with. The last thing they ever deserve, the last and worst thing they could ever receive, is our land, our women, our tribute or our servitude. It is the reversal of all that is right and good, the overturning of God’s natural order, the breaking of the great chain of being, the carrying off of Satan’s coup.
We fight for the very existence of Good in this world. The Satanists wish to define it away, and thus leave us with only evil. Only the suffering, only the wretchedness, only the falsehoods, lies, corruption, decay, vulgarity, degeneracy and ruin that our lessers will visit upon us. It all begins with the recognition of superior and inferior, of better and worse. It ends when we as a group choose the better over the worse, the true over the false, the beautiful over the ugly, the good over the bad, to inherit the cosmos.
Some Suggestions on Style:
Some Suggestions on Style:
February 12th, 2009There are good and bad reasons for the same goal. If a good reason is given to further an ideal, it will be welcomed or at least sympathized with. If a bad reason is given for that same ideal, it will not only be rejected, but the listener will become deaf to all other reasons for that same ideal, good and bad, disenchanted by the original bad one that looms over all the others.
Here’s a series of good and bad arguments for the same thing. Presentation is everything.
“Genes matter because the world is locked in a darwinian struggle where victory is defined by whoever passes on the most genes into the future. We should treat people correspondingly well or poorly based on their relative genetic relatedness to ourselves, in the hopes that cooperating with those like us will give us and them an edge over the competition–everyone else on earth.”
Bad. This is an amoral view that doesn’t believe in anything higher than ‘nature, red in tooth and claw.’ We’re humans, not bacteria, and we need to act like humans. Universal standards are the only fair ones, a perpetual war of all against all is fundamentally unappealing.
“Genes matter because our entire essence is coded into our DNA. Our intelligence, personality, behavior, productivity, health, beauty, everything is rooted in our genes. After all, no one is arguing that a giraffe if raised correctly could become a human, and yet the only remaining difference between giraffes and humans are genes. Once we accept how fundamental genes are to our inner nature, how our entire life is just a manifestation of our genome, just like a flower will carry the scent, colors, and shape its genes coded for at birth, we will see how connected good genes are to good people, and good people to the Good. Anyone who supports the Good will want good people and thus good genes, it’s inescapably vital.”
Good. It connects to higher ends, with universal and absolutist appeals. It is non-threatening and optimistic, instead of pessimistic. It shows what you’re for (good genes that make good people that make the Good), instead of what you’re against (anyone who endangers the propagation of your genome or competes for market share with your genes, be they good or bad).
“Because genes matter, it is important we keep our countries as genetically related as possible. Since everyone is simply working for the betterment of their genes, including alien genomes will only cause friction within a society working at cross-purposes. If they were to become the majority, their pursuit of their genome’s interests will become predatory and discriminatory against us, eventually to our annihilation. Before then, we must drive them out, sterilize them, annihilate them–whatever it takes.”
Bad. People aren’t just working for the betterment of their genes, many people are working for their ideals, and anyone who shares those ideals can benefit from the presence of each other. Sometimes it is to the advantage of both genomes to mix, or to simply work together living side by side, if for instance both have valuable traits the other lacks and people would love for their children to be or have access to in their daily life. And it is a major turn-off to solicit a real, present-day violence or suffering on a mass of people simply to prevent a hypothetical, far-future violence or suffering on a mass of people.
“Because genes matter, our country should be populated by people with good genes. Because the likelihood of good genes varies between the races, this will in practice mean a drastic skewing away from races with bad genes and towards races with good genes, though outstanding individuals of any sort are always welcome. We are confident a country full of beautiful, brilliant, honest, kind, courageous, and virtuous people will be a blessing to each other in daily life, and to the whole world in our products of mind and effort. This dream cannot be sacrificed to the greed or need of other groups who seek to be included in something they do not contribute to. Our children deserve a life of safety, prosperity, respect and pride — something they cannot be given when the teeming billions of the dysfunctional peoples of the world have equal access to our citizenship and nationhood.”
Good. It first delineates the good things that we are hoping for, and then shows how necessary anti-immigration policies are to protecting them. It is nothing against the immigrants or foreigners, it is just what we have to do out of love for our own. It also leaves murky how this goal will be achieved, which gives a great deal of room for compromise and peaceful solutions which, if not ideal and quick, are realistic and unoffending.
“Historically, whites have been the best people on earth. The Confederacy was full of proud, honorable aristocrats and soldiers who loved freedom. Nazi Germany was a model for all future whites to follow. Colonialism was awesome, especially the colonies in Brazil and the Caribbeans that shipped millions of blacks off to work until they died in the disease-infested tropical heat of our cash crops. Segregation in the South and Apartheid in South Africa is the height of wisdom and fairness, the Crusades were just trying to take back our own land, and honestly, I can’t think of a single time whites have ever been in the wrong, about anything, anywhere.”
Bad. Do not even discuss these issues if you can, but if you have to, don’t make excuses or apologies for dubious behavior. The more you defend them, the more their taint rubs off on you. Simply say things should have been done better but there’s nothing you can do about the past, we are worried about the future. Point out that all groups have pasts full of dubious behavior and no one else has to constantly apologize or make amends for the actions of their ancestors.
“Historically, whites have been the best people on earth. We are an amazing race possessing some of the greatest talents that have ever lived. We are the nation of Shakespeare, Goethe, Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, Newton, Rembrandt, Titian, Monet, Euler, Euclid, Homer, Plato, Aristotle, Michelangelo, Tolstoy, Dostoeveskey, and a thousand more. We have split the atom and journeyed to the moon, and brought about the most important material gains in man’s history using our meta-invention, the scientific method. We invented the steam engine, the car, the textile industry, mass-manufacturing, the airplane, the refrigerator, the television and the computer. We feed the world, we’ve brought peace to the world — (fewer people die by violence today than at any other time in human history), we’ve cured so many diseases of the world, we entertain the world and we enlighten the world. There could never be the billions upon billions of non-whites in the world, all at a higher standard of life than they’ve ever imagined before, if not for our economics, technology, medicine, charity, and good govenmental policies we’ve encouraged everywhere. And it is not just what we’ve done for others, but what wonderful lives we lead amongst ourselves, that fills me with admiration. We are a free people, who can say what we like, servile and beholden to none. Our women are loved and respected, we do not mistreat them, demean them, cover them up, or rape them like so many others do. We are slow to anger and quick to forgive, we trust others and do not stick to clannish rivalries that serve no one. We are honest, hard-working–I’d like to believe the most honest and hard working people in the world–but not so uptight we can’t enjoy wine, sex, and song. We take care of our poor but do not deny people the opportunity to get rich through their talent, effort, and good ideas. Just looking at the love and joy in a white family at a park or on a hike, how unafraid and verbose our children are because nobody has punished or oppressed or hurt them, how loving the looks exchanged between the mother and father, swells my heart with how wonderful it is that whites live on this green earth.”
Good. Who can argue that Tchaikovsky and Raphael were evil? Who can condemn us for flying to the moon? Who can resent us for not raping our women in prowling street gangs who think it’s a good sport to fill their otherwise empty days? With all of world history to pick and choose from, with all the qualities whites have shown in the present and across time, why not champion the most indisputable, the most refreshing, the most gentle and happy ones? Why not love them, and ask others to love them too, and through them, us, who stand with them and are their seed? Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t, but it leaves a clean feeling in your heart, instead of arguing about justifications for the Nazis and the slave-trade–it’s like looking at a line of freshly-snowed in peaks and knowing you’ve been at the top of them all. It let’s your soul soar instead of stoop, and that needs to be our goal.
The Fruits of Nationalism: Prosperity, Security, Autonomy, and Dignity
The Fruits of Nationalism: Prosperity, Security, Autonomy, and Dignity
February 13th, 2009A political party must do one thing to achieve power: Find out what people want, then give it to them.
First we must ask ourselves what people want. What they really, truly want. I think it can be pretty well categorized into four different things: Prosperity, Security, Autonomy, and Dignity. How is government going to deliver these things to the people? If we don’t, some other political party will promise to do so, and the electorate will favor them in a landslide.
Prosperity needn’t be extravagant. It means having a place of your own, with clean water, electricity, sewage, air conditioning/heating, good food, good health, a wife, at least two kids, a pet, a car, nice clothes, nice furniture, and a ready source of entertainment. When people complain about money, it’s usually because they can’t afford one of these things. If it’s because they can’t afford something else, it’s no longer under the category of ‘prosperity’ and more leaning toward ‘vanity,’ ‘pleasure-seeking,’ or ‘to look respectable’ (which we’ll get to under Dignity.) A nationalist party is unique in not favoring the rich or the poor, it offers prosperity for all. My favorite idea is the ‘Flat Plan.’ A flat tax combined with a flat citizen’s dividend which redistributes this money could satisfy everyone’s wishes at once. The rich are not taxed so heavily that they cannot make money, nor are the poor left high and dry concerning the most basic essentials. Due to the ‘everyone gets the same money equally’ flat rate, however, bad behavior like single motherhood, drug use, or anything else does not get rewarded with extra government handouts. Furthermore, no group can vote itself especially more handouts at the expense of any other group, eliminating the robber-baron nature of majority rules democracy. This also keeps bureaucracy low and jobs in the private sphere because the government solely hands out money, not goods or services, and it has no need of oversight on how the money is spent or distributed because that is left in the hands of the people. Pork barrel projects and corporate lobbying is impossible under this system, because no one can get any special benefits for themselves. It is the combination of socialism and libertarianism in one — it’s nationalism.
Security is self explanatory. People want their life and their property to be protected. No one should be a victim of crime, or of government rapaciousness or corruption. You should be able to live out your entire life without anyone hurting you or anyone you know. ((If it’s hard to believe trust me, this is what it was like in the past! Small towns could go for 100 years without a murder, all the doors were left open and neighbors could go freely between the houses chatting without a fear, kids played in the streets and no one worried about where they were because they were safe everywhere they went.)) There is also a deeper sense to the word, which is having a secure place in your community. People want to belong, and to be accepted by others, and security means having somewhere to go where you belong and are accepted. A job that you won’t lose, a church or social group that sticks together, a marriage that will not break up, a belief system you can ascribe to comfortably your whole life without it being challenged or assaulted. People long for this security just as much as the security of peace or low crime, but there is very little of this present in the world today. Offering security on all fronts is one of the most appealing aspects of a nationalist party. We take no shift from criminals and make no excuses for minorities. The great thing about nationalists is you know we’re serious when we say we’ll keep the streets safe, crack down on crime and corruption, or anything of the like. Because we are not afraid of facing reality. Furthermore, nationalists wish to preserve the prevailing culture, norms, and workforce. The most direct way we secure these benefits for our people is preventing immigration from changing the face of your neighborhoods or towns underneath you, another thing nationalists do is preserve domestic industry and jobs from off-sourcing and the buffets of globalism by looking to the interests of our own people first. It used to be you could work at the same job for 40 years and then retire on a handsome pension and take care of your entire family on a decent wage. By reducing immigration which drives up the labor force and drives down wages, and using protective tariffs against foreign cheap-labor competition abroad, those days can be restored. As for protecting the family, it will be more difficult, perhaps impossible, if the spirit of the people are no longer willing. But a nationalist party would do everything it could in the schools and in the culture to support families, to respect families, to encourage child-birth, and to make it affordable to start and have a family. The citizen’s dividend is a major portion of this, so are low taxes, and a secure job.
Autonomy means being left alone to make your life decisions for yourself. People don’t want to be controlled or policed or spied on at all times of their life. People want to make their own choices, control their own purchases, wear what they like, say what they like, love whom they please, worship whom they please, and determine their own destiny. The best thing about the Flat Plan is it does not conflict with people’s autonomy even though it gives everyone prosperity and security. This is a balancing act and only the nationalists can pull it off. Nationalists can offer people true autonomy because Political Correctness, the nanny state, debt, crushing poverty, high taxes, crime that keeps you locked inside your houses, and all the rest that robs people of their freedom and choices will be gone. The citizen’s dividend gives everyone the freedom to pursue their dreams without becoming beholden to bankers; free speech, the right to bear arms, freedom of religion, and all the rest gives people the rest of their autonomy. The reason nationalism can offer these freedoms where no one else can, is because we aren’t afraid of offending anyone. We don’t have any internal divisions that need to be coddled or protected. We are one nation, one people, and we’re not afraid of each other, offended by each other, or out to get each other. In such a climate, everyone can act freely and breathe the free air of their ‘blood and soil.’ In a multiculture you live in a giant prison camp. Simply being yourself, not harming anyone, can get you fired, thrown in jail, ostracized, divorced, or bankrupt. Your every interaction with everyone falls under some bizarre contraption of affirmative action, civil rights laws, hate speech codes, and all the rest. Around women you must worry about sexual harassment lawsuits, around non-whites discrimination lawsuits, and crime is so high you can never just walk around town or let your kids go out and play.
Last, people desire to have a sense of dignity. They want to feel dignified and worth something inside themselves, and they want others to treat them with respect, to value them, to treat them like human beings, deserving of dignity and some base level of courtesy and kindness. People’s dignity is fragile and almost intangible, but it’s worth every bit as much as prosperity, security, or autonomy. There are plenty of people who if hypothetically offered all the other good things in life if only they gave up their dignity and, say, sucked someone’s dick once in their life – would say no, not on your life. What is it they are protecting? What is it they want more than anything else? It’s their dignity. And perhaps it is our dignity that has been most assaulted by the multicult. We are told day in and day out by the media, by commercials, by our schools, by our politicians, our books, even our preachers that we are evil, that we are scum, that our ancestors were villains, that we should apologize for everything and take the blame for everything anyone suffered anywhere on earth. We are forced by the multicult to continuously mouth lies, or at best hold our tongues as other people speak lies all around us that we cannot afford to dispute socially or economically. It’s humiliating, it’s destructive to the soul, to our internal pride and dignity. There is a vision of what a human being should be like, that he shouldn’t have to bow or scrape to anyone, that he’s as good as the next guy, that he should never have to eat shit, apologize for wrongs he didn’t do, lie, or accept the abuse of others without retaliatory self-defense. Nationalists, yet again, can offer people their dignity back. For women, there will no longer be non-whites pawing, raping, ogling you, or calling you ‘whores.’ Non-whites treat women atrociously and white women especially bad, because they know we are not allowed to defend you and you are made to feel guilty and ‘racist’ if you defend yourselves. Men need no longer serve under affirmative-action bosses, watch commercials where white males bumble around as their much cooler black coworkers do everything right, read slanted news coverage of our politics, or any of the rest. We will have a government that respects us and relies on us, instead of demeans, insults, and enslaves us to their pet ‘diversity’ they wish to ‘equalize’ today. Under a nationalist party, everyone belongs and is a respected and valued member of society, because you’re a member of our nation. When you look at the flag, that flag stands for you. No one else on earth. For you and yours. And that’s who we are working for, not the global village, not the poor or unfortunate, for the nation. A sense of self worth and human decency and proud upbearing in your step can’t be directly given to you, but our way of life can help, and most of all it doesn’t actively seek to undermine and destroy it in those who would naturally have it, always, like a second skin. Nationalists do not hate confident, self-assured, noble people. It honors them and asks for their help in the great work of furthering our people’s greatness. It does not forget its heroes or its benefactors, it does not denigrate its wives and mothers. It teaches children to love themselves and their history and their destiny in the movies and the schools, instead of hate it all. If you’re rich or poor, old or young, boy or girl, even smart or dumb, so long as you’re of good character you will keep your dignity. That’s what a nation does for each other, and that’s how nationalists roll.
So we have our task: find out what people want, then give it to them. If people do want prosperity, security, autonomy, and dignity like I suspect, show them how nationalism can give that to them. If people don’t want it, ask them what they really do want and let’s see if we can deliver that too. Best of all, nationalism doesn’t pose a direct threat to anyone, even to minorities. If they keep their noses clean and mind their own business, we can mind our own business and treat them like everyone else. Their presence will not stop us from gifting our people with the goods they need, the dominant culture will be transformed, and the way of life will favor enough people that we’ll always have the votes to prevail, minorities or no.
Happy Valentine’s Day!
Happy Valentine’s Day!
February 14th, 2009
“My Soft Sea.”
Cradled against your breast,
my head upon the softest, sweetest sea.
Lulled by rising and falling breath,
listening to the heart–beating for me.
“The Song of Life.”
There are songs of day, and of night,
lark and robin, thrush and owl.
So many songs, in so many throats,
all crying, wishing, pining, wooing.
All songs pleading the tiniest of things:
to me, my love. to me. to me.
Life’s calling upon all life:
to me. to me. to me
“A Mountain Stream.”
The trees filtered sunlight upon a mountain stream,
finding two lovers, clad in spray and gleam.
They sparkled, and glistened, and shone,
like two suns of their very own.
–by Diamed. It’d be fun if commentors added in their own love poems. Here’s your chance to be read by the world. :).
Democracy Has Failed
Democracy Has Failed
February 23rd, 2009Democracy finds its roots in ancient Greece, where Athenians and others were allowed to vote for their political views. Aristotle wrote about Democracy in his work, Politics. He said it worked for small groups for small periods of time, but would always eventually degenerate into a mobocracy. He didn’t think very highly of other governmental systems either, though. All aristocracies would eventually degenerate into oligarchies, and all monarchies were destined to become tyrannies. Or as Kant would say: “From the crooked timber of humanity, nothing ever did grow smooth.”
Montesquieu in his seminal work The Spirit of the Laws discusses the same problems. That democracies seem to thrive when there are high pitches of civic virtue, a 3 Musketeersian ‘one for all, and all for one’ that pervades the streets and animates the discussions of people who sit around the cooler. He thought it might be best for small nations but showed little sign of success in large ones.
Churchill later summed up history’s thinking on the subject with his bon mot: “Democracy is the worst form of government on earth, except for all the others.”
The strength of democracy is hard to counter. Most of the democratic world is wealthy, free, technologically and scientifically advanced, has a long lifespan, and peaceful. For hundreds of years democratic nations have thrived while dictatorships caused disastrous wars or committed atrocities against their own people. Even the dictatorships of the world sought to cloak themselves in the legitimacy of democracy. The ‘People’s Republic of China,’ the “Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.” And the endless fake elections pre-arranged to yield near 100% unanimous support for the endlessly elected dictators of Africa, South America, and the Middle East. Now we seem to be nearing the age where the whole world will become democratic, or even join a global democracy erasing all states on earth.
And yet, how can we view an institution that has so universally betrayed its own people, so swiftly destroyed the work of eons, as current-day democracy? How is it that a scientist who just cured cancer is only given one vote on the direction of his country, right alongside the 18 year old high schooler who’s never done a thing in his life, the felon just released from jail, the illiterate retard who can’t tie his own shoes, the follower of fashion magazines who votes based solely on how ‘hot’ the politician looks, and all the other human drivel that washes up on our national shores? It is handing over the keys of the asylum to the inmates, to allow any schmoe to set public policy. No one takes a vote on how to fix a plumbing or electric problem, we hire the expert who knows what needs to be done, and pay them to do it. In fact, common sense reigns in every other field of thought. Doctors do not treat patients based on a massive vote of the electorate on what they think the doctor should do to help, they simply use their knowledge and expertise and do it themselves. And yet when our country need fixing, when our country needs treating, we immediately resort to a vote to figure out what should be done. What just happened? No one would trust their life to a vote under the doctor’s knife, and yet we all willingly hand over our country and the fate of our children to the exact same process.
It is not even true that in a democracy, bumbling morons control the levers of power. If only! This basic error of democracy is compounded when special interests peddle their influence to gain votes from said bumbling morons. Money buys politicians, because it takes money to run a campaign and advertise to people to vote for ‘x’. Whoever pays the piper, calls the tune. Having a good idea or a brilliant plan that would improve the lives of everyone in the country is not the path to political power in a democracy. Winning votes is the path to power, and the easiest way to do that is to continuously saturate people with media and commercials talking about how great you are. It doesn’t need substance, only style, and the masses drink it up. Most voters have no idea what positions our politicians hold or what plans they have to help the nation. They simply go into the voting booth having heard and read lots of good ‘vibes’ about their candidate and turn the lever. When the media plays kingmaker by saturating the news coverage with a slanted favorable coverage of one side and unfavorable of the other, it becomes nearly impossible to gain traction with the masses.
The worst mistake of democracy was expanding it beyond its intended borders. Democracy was always meant to work for a small, publically spirited, nation of biologically related, culturally related, linguistically related, folk. So long as everyone was related, it was doubtful one group would wish the enslavement or destruction of another, or that one group would routinely underperform the other and become a burden on their neighbors, or that there would be irreconcilable differences between the differing political parties. The moment democracy metastizised to include such basically different groups as Flemings and Walloons, Quebecois and Anglos, or Luo and Kikyou, we created a new democratic curse — tribalism and the unified voting of a tribe to gain wealth, power, and prestige from the competing tribes. 98% of blacks voted for Obama, not because they just so happened to think he was the best qualified candidate, but because they felt he would support his fellow blacks once in power. This kind of democracy devolves to a tribal head-count, or two wolves and a sheep voting over what’s for dinner. Three wolves or three sheep can vote on that matter rather fairly — a mixed-species democracy cannot.
It gets worse. Once diversity has begun in a democracy, it becomes an unstoppable force that gains momentum every election. Why? Because inevitably, one party will seek power by peddling to new immigrants. In this case democracy has completely reversed itself, as the government seeks to abolish the people and elect a new one. If they can’t get enough votes from the current electorate, why adjust their platform or become better people? It’s easier to just find some tribe out in the world that would vote for you if you let them immigrate into your country, and voila the natives no longer matter or have any say in their own government’s policies. Only by restricting the vote to one unified nation can this kind of coup be stopped–once your country is a ‘nation of immigrants’ anyone and everyone can quickly be deciding the best use of YOUR money, YOUR land and YOUR children. In the past transportation was not sufficiently advanced to simply parachute in a hundred million bantus to win the next election for your country, but now this is a simple and easy technique ‘democracy’ can rely on to gain or keep power.
Never have people been less free than under South African democracy. Crime is higher than a war-zone, the courts do not catch criminals and do not protect innocents brought up on bogus charges. The government openly loots the treasury, while all the tax dollars collected come from the hopelessly outnumbered whites to be splurged on the hopelessly helpless blacks. The borders aren’t controlled, Black Economic Empowerment means no amount of schooling, intelligence, enterprise, dedication, or virtue will let qualified people get the job, disease completely cripples the country while the Presidents make ridiculous statements like HIV doesn’t cause AIDS or taking a shower after sex prevents the catching of AIDS. Fetal alcohol syndrome, alcoholism, drunk driving, black magic body harvesting rituals, and the rape of tens of thousands of babies are just more unique gems South Africa showers down upon its denizens. And yet people are still allowed to vote in free and fair elections for whatever party they like. What does it matter? The outcome is determined ahead of time, by the very nature of democracy: The influence of money, the stupidity of the masses, the diversity of the country, the lack of civic virtue or public-mindedness, the lies of the media, the use of immigration as a weapon, the ease of acquiring unearned wealth and power through government-enforced redistribution, on and on. Not a thousand or ten thousand elections will ever elect the proper ruler for South Africa, or a proper political platform for that country, one that could actually heal the nation and help its people. Another source of legitimacy, another selection process is needed, for South Africa and the ailing democracies of the entire world.
Democracy Has Failed: Part II
Democracy Has Failed: Part II
February 27th, 2009
The depths of democracy’s depravity have not yet been delved. Here are some more reasons I neglected last time, but really should get their day in the sun:
Earlier I discussed democracy failing because everything people know is filtered through a biased media. No one can personally verify with their own eyes what is going on in the world, and so we rely on newspapers, radios, tv, and perhaps fancy books published by fancy professors discussing the issues. All of it goes through middle-men who slant it in their favor and play the people like a fiddle. Even very well educated and intelligent people are stuck with ridiculous political beliefs that would never survive logical scrutiny, because they are helpless not to — they’ve never been presented with anything else. However, there is a corallary to this I neglected. A democracy cannot function without transparency and complete knowledge of the truth. We would need full access to the same data the government is getting, and full knowledge of the moral character and mindset of our politicians, to even make a rational judgment on any of the issues we face from day to day. Even in a representative democracy, how can we vote for our representatives unless we know who and what they will represent? Without full transparancy the voting process is a complete sham. Governments lie to their people to get popular support, and keep everything secret, and then come election day an electorate that knows nothing about either the candidate’s personal life or his policies are asked to choose between various politicians. What’s the use? 70% of the USA at the beginning of the Iraq war thought Saddam had done 9/11. The government had lied to us long enough and thoroughly enough, that people were ready to believe anything and do whatever the government wished. Is that true democracy? What say do people have when they must act based on lies and have no access to the truth, the intelligence reports and cabinet meetings and all the rest? We never learn about the bad character of our presidents until it’s too late, it seems. We don’t even know if Obama is an American citizen. It’s a simple question with a simple, transparent answer, just produce the birth certificate! But the people of a democracy do not have the right to know whether our Constitution is being followed or not, apparently only a few select lawyers and hawaii state officials ever get to learn what’s actually in his files. Is this a government of the people, by the people, for the people? It is legendary how in democracies politicians promise one thing to get elected and then do the other. Bush Sr. said “read my lips, no new taxes.” Then he raised taxes. Bush Jr. said he would conduct a “humble, non-interventionary foreign-policy” then invaded two different countries. Since we never know who and what we are actually electing, why even bother having an election? The people never get a say in what elected officials actually do once they’re elected. And once the new election comes around 4 years later, it’s far too late to prevent the damage.
Earlier I discussed the dangers of tribalism in a democracy and the tendency to pursue factional interests over the public good. However, even in a completely homogeneous society, there will still be two warring tribes right under our noses, each voting for their collective interests instead of the good of the whole. Men and Women. People who cannot see past their own noses and vote for the larger public good, who cannot fathom a principled moral argument for how the world should be, like say Kant’s categorical imperative: ‘act in such a manner that your more could become a universal rule,’ are doomed to use the vote to oppress and abuse others, steal their property, steal their opportunities, and steal their autonomy. Is it really wise to give the vote, an all powerful weapon which can create or destroy any law they please, can make legal the most morally abhorrent of stances, can grant or deny any right they please, by simply getting a 2/3 majority vote that could amend the constitution, to people of low moral character? To people accustomed to cheating in school, cheating on their spouse, abandoning their kids to divorce, pillaging each other in frivolous lawsuits — suddenly when they enter the voting booth their heads clear up, they fill their heads with angelic virtue, and vote only for the right thing, never their own personal interest? Only a few people have the strength of character to pull such a lever, it is absurd to treat everyone equally in the face of such discrepancies. The tragedy of the commons is a well known problem whenever there is collective ownership of a property. People see no reason to preserve it because they know if they don’t take advantage of it, someone else will. A democracy is one giant tragedy of the commons. Everything, every person, every object, every minute of labor, even every word spoken is public property. It can be voted away to the highest bidder and is voted away, every second of our lives, until we are virtually slaves working for government more than 1/2 of our every paycheck. People have no stake in the future of the country, after all if they don’t abuse it someone else will, and thus everyone piles their sheep into the commons and grazes the hell out of it. The chaos is always someone else’s problem, the benefit is always your own. How could anyone be so myopic as to miss this obvious feature of democracy? Property rights are the basis of a sound economy and secure society. But there can be no such thing as property rights if democracies can vote them away (which they can and do vote away every time.)
Worse, democracy tends to group disparate interests under a single umbrella in order to gain electoral strength. In cases like this you have groups and individuals diametrically opposed to one another in the same party, with politicians offering a smorgasbord to all sorts of different groups in the hopes of bribing all of them to sign on. This means no one can truly vote for the government and politicians they like. They must always vote for the lesser of two evils, never their conscience. Then instead of getting the dream government they’ve always wanted (to me living under a law code you and like-minded individuals chose in a free and sovereign territory of your own should be a human right, indeed the only necessary human right in life), we are left with inane chimeras that can never satisfy everyone — hell, they can never satisfy ANYONE.
Democracy also has the unique phenonemon of having such expensive, long campaign seasons, with so much fund-raising and travelling, that no government work ever actually gets done. the moment someone is elected, they begin their re-election campaign. Instead of achieving anything for the people, all they care about is fund raising for the next election 2 years from now. Constant elections also makes life hell for anyone planning ahead. Who knows how many trillions are spent every year, how long businesses must avoid making decisions for fear the wrong person will get elected and implement a contradictory plan? How can anyone make any long-term plans in the topsy turvy world of constant elections, each of which can totally redefine the economy? How can people even bring a family into this world, never knowing what their kids can expect from the governments of the future? The whole country practically shuts down one out of every four years, increasing accountability by demanding more elections would come at the price of decreased efficiency as people are stuck paying attention to politics instead of their personal lives. There is no solution, the entire process is insane.
Now, what are the moral alternatives to democracy that could cure all these ails? Generally if someone wishes to criticize something, they should at least be ready to provide a better alternative. However, since none of these alternatives will ever be permitted by the powers that be, they are mere thought experiments. But just for fantasy’s sake, why not replace democracy with unanimity? People need to get together, agree on the values and truths they uphold, and sort themselves accordingly, into nations with laws that enact these values and truths in perpetuity. There, everyone gets exactly what they want. Everyone is happy in their own diverse way. Everyone is free, everyone has full dignity and respect given to his views and preferences, everyone has a voice. Countries would have to be much smaller than they are today, but who cares? In the past, nations commonly existed with no more than 50,000 people, and no one noticed a problem. Today there are likely millions of people holding the most obscure sets of values in common, the world is so populous. A viable nation could be formed out of every single community. Let a thousand flowers bloom, let a thousand schools of thought contend. This is the Greatest Vision, the mirror we can hold up to present-day democracy to reflect how horrible things are compared to how they should be. This will never occur on earth though, haters of freedom and crushers of independent thought make sure no such assortative migrations could ever occur, the economy chains people into areas and neighborhoods they share nothing with, there are linguistic barriers, people are afraid of change, etc. It can only occur in space, when every people is free to make its own destiny independent from all the others. A planet for every people, a star for every system. Can you imagine? Everyone achieving their most heartfelt desire, without conflicting with anyone else. For a visionary, Churchill’s claim that “Democracy is the worst of all systems, except for all the others,” is now dead. I can imagine an ur-system better than all the others, one where everyone lives under the laws of their choosing, in a community of their own making, with a life they are entirely responsible for–good or bad, at the cost of no one else, and hindered by no one else. We no longer have to put up with democracy out of fear of tyranny, oligarchy, cleptocracy, theocracy, or any other fears. The greatest vision has come to sweep it all away.
No sword can pierce, nor fire burn, nor age rust our Sacred Cause. We, and It, are Immortal:
No sword can pierce, nor fire burn, nor age rust our Sacred Cause. We, and It, are Immortal:
March 10th, 2009
What do we want? A place we can call our own among people like ourselves.
This desire will never die because it is instinctual and innate to the human psyche. No matter how many times it is crushed and ground down, no matter how many centuries tyranny clamps down and suppresses this natural urge, it will bloom again the moment the shade is gone. Nations that have not existed for thousands of years suddenly re-emerge, good as new, as strong as ever. The dream never dies. Not for Israel, not for Armenia, not for Ukraine, not for Montenegro. You cannot kill the human spirit. For centuries the world has been fracturing, not uniting, into ever-smaller, ever more localized, ever more homogeneous ethno-states. The British Empire, the Ottoman empire, the French Empire, the Russian Empire, the Spanish Empire, the Portugeuse Empire, and every other great power shrank back to its original ethnic core, leaving like stranded shells and starfish with the retreat of the tide newly minted state after state of emergent peoples eager and excited to forge their own path. Does anyone think global socialism or global capitalism will prevail? That a one-world empire will succeed where even tiny Czechoslovakia failed and had to split apart? The powers that level, tyrannize, conquer, control, and oppress are indeed vast and constantly growing, but they are not the only power in the universe. There are forces for good on this earth compelling people into just the opposite positions, forces that yearn for freedom, for community, for continuity and most of all for family. For kith and kin. Sometimes we also get the upperhand, sometimes we also get our day in the sun, and the forces of righteousness gain the upperhand. This is an eternal and nearly evenly balanced war that has been raging for thousands of years, between not two sides but perhaps 10, or 20, or 100 sides. Each side represents an instinct and desire, an evolved longing or taste, some portion of the human brain trying to get its way. This human nature is shared by most everyone, in some one desire is prominent, in others, another, but we all have all of them in some degree. Because these desires are mutually incompatible and contradictory, we can never achieve everything we want, and we will always be in conflict. Because people will always vary concerning which desire is more central and basic to their lives, there will always be war, disagreements, conflicts, hurt feelings, discord and contumely. Sometimes one force gains the upperhand, sometimes another, dependent on outside factors that favor one or the other. These outside factors are the natural environment, technology, and recent history. If for instance one side of the conflict has just recently won a war, you can expect the other side to be unnaturally weak, quiscient, and vulnerable for a brief span of time following that misfortune. However, these factors are constantly in flux, and thus, the people with the upper hand are constantly in flux as well. There is no decisive final victory. Even if one side of this perpetual struggle managed to hunt down and kill all the proponents of the other side, they would immediately find new enemies in their own children–because all core desires and values and traits are represented in the human psyche and are reborn each generation.
Someday we will rise again, or people very much like ourselves, our ‘children of the mind,’ our spiritual descendants who uphold and cherish our values. People who carry our banner into war and sing our songs around the fireplace, or songs we would have loved and approved of, songs we would have sung if only we had heard them. Does anyone for one second imagine south africa will always be this way? Truly? The cause of truth, beauty, and love cannot be defeated at any particular battlefield, it cannot be defeated by any particular tyranny, it cannot be defeated by any particular religion or belief system, it re-emerges like a beautiful spring flower from mountain snow every time a child is born, a child of infinite potential, unblemished by all the former suffering of the world, unimpressed by all the lies humanity has been told since its inception.
We represent a shard of the human spirit, an aspect, like Shiva or Vishnu, of the human race. Humanity has many faces and many personalities, and at times we wear one, at times another. When a schizophrenic has ‘molly’ in charge and calling the shots, that does not mean ‘eileen’ no longer exists or will never emerge again. It just means, currently, molly is the personality the schizo shows the outside world. The wheel of time turns, and ages come and pass. It will be our turn again, someday, when the external factors align in our favor. When ‘molly’ needs us again. When ‘molly’ is too scared to face the truth, or too helpless to protect herself, she will retreat into the inner recesses of the brain and ‘Eileen’ will advance to the fore. It’s only a question of When, not If.
What is Justice?
What is Justice?
March 13th, 2009Ordinarily, there are three ’schools’ of thought on this issue. One is the ‘conservative’ position that justice is simply property rights. Justice means people are left alone to enjoy the fruit of their capital and labor and luck, without force or fraud from either criminals or government interfering with it. The second is the ‘liberal’ position that believes property is inherently unjust and true justice is ’social justice.’ This is where people are given equal opportunities at the expense of all other rights which might interfere, which then necessarily must follow within acceptable bounds to equal outcomes. The logic goes like this: If the opportunities were truly equal, then so would the outcomes be, so if the outcomes aren’t equal this means we must continue rectifying the obvious inequalities of opportunity, whatever the cost. Justice has not yet arrived until we can see its equal results in the world around us. The third school of thought is that justice is God’s domain, and whatever God wills the world to be like is a just world. The muslims ascribe to this theory by their constant mention of ‘Insha’allah.’ Christians resort to it every Lord’s Prayer with “Thy will be done, in earth as it is in heaven.” And, generally, those who believe in a fated order to the universe of any sort, even darwinian evolution, will be content so long as they see the ‘divine order,’ the ‘cosmic system’ playing out as it was theoretically intended to play out. I’ve never been fond of any of them because they strike me as ‘intellectual’ justices, whereas the issue is deeply emotional and has to do with your ‘gut instinct.’ If someone spins a great argument logically proving the sky is yellow, an argument I can’t refute in any way and have to admit he’s right on every point, my gut will still rebel and I’ll still say he’s wrong, the sky is blue. This is the dual nature of ‘will.’ One part does indeed involve itself with language, logic, facts, reasoning, and all that jazz. But another train of thought operates entirely independently. It looks at something and has a visceral emotional reaction, immediately reaches a conclusion of attraction or aversion, and then cannot be convinced by anything to change their mind about it. It is in this world justice truly lives. As shown by science experiments:
In the experiment, you have two people. One is given a 100 dollars. he then can make an offer to the other person, how this money should be split. If the other person rejects the offer, they both get nothing. If he accepts it, they get whatever split the first man offered. You only get one shot so there’s no bargaining back and forth. Now, logically, if the original guy proffered a 99-1 split, the second person should still agree because he would still gain a dollar from the deal. However, the experiment showed most people were unwilling to go below 60-40. Their innate sense of justice kicks in, and they reject out of hand a social arrangement that is beneath their dignity and outrageous. The logic flies out the window and both people walk away without a penny to their name.
So when I review my visceral emotional reactions, my genuine face contorting moments when I feel wronged and that justice has not been done, I reach completely different conclusions than any of the three previous intellectual definitions. That isn’t to say that my intellect doesn’t engage itself with these issues all the time and variously has supported all three definitions in one context or another. It isn’t to say that any of the arguments are even weak or wrong or flawed. It’s just that they are incomplete and are not taking into account the complexity of the human mind. It is this raw, angry, “I must be avenged,” “this will not be allowed to stand” justice that actually has the greatest sway on people’s actions. Therefore it is an appeal to this justice, not the cold intellectualism, that most activates the masses to some meaningful course. For instance, even though the Koran clearly states that all unbelievers (kaffirs) must be conquered and enslaved or killed, and that it is therefore the carrying out of God’s divinely ordained justice to blow us up, muslims rarely act on this passage or get fired up about it and blow themselves up over it. Perhaps a few loons, or a few incredibly strong-willed people who really can internalize an intellectual argument and make it into a passionate intense judgment. But show the muslim world the suffering children of Gaza Strip, show the bombed out buildings, the crying widows, the sneering and unfeeling Israeli soldiers, the fat happy idiot Christians prating on about God’s chosen people deserving their homeland when the Palestinians have been there for millenia and driven out of all their homes– and suddenly ‘justice’ comes to the fore and Allah’s will or not, they want to at least take a few of those fucking kaffirs with them before they go. This is the raw pulsing wound that radicalizes muslims all over the globe, not any cold intellectual fare they can read in the koran. Heck, most muslims can’t even read, nor do they ever read the koran. I’m a better expert on their religion, having read the koran, sira, and many hadith, than they will ever be. Nor is it because they aren’t given ‘equal opportunities’ to live and work in Israel like the liberal crowd assumes, or because they are poor. There are plenty of poor people around the world but most don’t try to blow up their richer next door neighbors. Every single interpretation of the Palestinian conflict is based on intellectual justice and thus incomplete and flawed. More than anything else, Palestinians want emotional justice to be done. It is their emotions that hurt the most.
The Germans of Weimar Germany had a lot of reasons to hate jews. If you take the three intellectual justices, you will find that in the Christian religion jews are given short shrift and the church fathers encouraged their persecution, simultaneously the Nazi darwinism also calls for a ‘cosmic’ opposition to jews because they were foreign seed genetic competitors. From a social justice standpoint, jews were rich and in prominent social positions all across Germany far disproportionate to their numbers, and this at a time of depression and hyperinflation, influenza and starvation for the normal German people. Even from a conservative standpoint, the jews’ radical calls for marxism and attempted socialist revolutions which would have replicated the horrors of the USSR on Germany was more than enough reason to oppose Jews for the sake of property rights and law and order. However, jews were not opposed for any of these reasons, not really. It was the gut instinct, the random latching on to an ultimate injustice that could not be tolerated, that radicalized Germany against its Jews — “the stab in the back.” When Germany learned German jews had conspired with Britain to get America into WWI by pulling the strings of prominent American jews to agitate for war to the president, getting the infamous balfour declaration as payment, the German people were incensed. While Germans were dying in the front, while the German people were starving under the war-crime blockade, fat conspiring cigar smoking jews were plotting treason and the downfall of the Fatherland. Even though Germany had treated them better than anywhere else, even though they were rich and free and powerful, the jews repaid Germany by the ’stab in the back.’ It doesn’t matter if this was mainly propoganda and a myth, it doesn’t matter that 99.9999% of jews may have disapproved of this action, the emotion was there. It was this emotion that festered in the German consciousness for the next twenty years. That isn’t the whole of it though, when it comes to face-contorting rage, of a fiery sense of ‘where is justice on this earth?’ the lowest point probably wasn’t even there. The lowest point of German fury with the jews was the fact that during the great depression, many decent normal German women were forced into prositution simply to feed their kids. And who was there to make money out of their misfortune? Of course, the jews. Something like 90% of the pimps, the notorious middlemen extroardinaires, who don’t mind making money for any reason at any cost, were jews. Jewish pimps parading around brothels of decent, honorable but destitute white german women and selling them on the street to the highest bidder. Now think for ten seconds, does this scene make you angry? Does it strike a nerve? I know it struck mine. I was furious when I learned the truth. “How dare they?” Was the first question I asked myself. And that, my friends, is emotional justice.
So let’s try and narrow in on this emotional reflex and give a definition that truly fits the human experience, and an appeal that truly radicalizes people to say “ENOUGH, IT IS TIME TO ACT.” For the Romans, it was when a prominent Roman marrid woman Lucrece was raped by the Estrucan King Tarquin, announced this fact to the public, then committed suicide to blot out the shame cast on her honor. That was enough. One raped woman incensed the people more than being occupied by foreign kings for generations, more than any economic dispossession, more than any lack of democracy, more than their Gods being disrespected or whatever the current intellectual arguments were. A woman had been raped, she was now dead, and her honor had not yet been avenged. That was enough. From that day forward Rome was free. For the next two thousand years or so it was the most powerful force in history, the roman eagle still flies over America and Russia. What a difference she made by appealing to man’s emotional and instinctual craving for justice! If only we could do the same, and have the same result!
So let’s give it a whirl, shall we? The new definition of justice: “Justice is when evil people are not better off than good people.” I don’t care about the vicissitudes of fortune, as a stoic I have little interest in material advantages one way or the other. If Saddam Hussein has a finer collection of silverware and pottery than me, I’m not going to get passionately incensed. But if a wife cheats on her husband, and as a result lives happily ever after with her new guy, never shamed by the rest of the world, never feeling an iota of guilt for what she did, while the husband’s heart is broken and never recovers, miserable and alone for the rest of his life, a fundamental injustice has occurred. Why is he miserable? Why is she happy? She’s the adulterer! No matter how bad his life is, it’s okay, so long as hers is worse, he can at least gain satisfaction in that. If hers is spotless, perfect, and enviable, then what cost evil? What cost to betray, lie, and steal your way through life? Should we all just be like them, emulate them, are they the only way to thrive on this earth? If so, what is the meaning of life, what is the point of a world so degraded, wouldn’t it be better to simply obliterate the entire universe than sanction and participate in a farce that is an unjust one? The same for a victim of crime. If a man is shot in the back of the head, but the criminal walks free after a couple years, then an evil person is better off than the good person. This should NEVER HAPPEN. The criminal should be executed, and the ledgers become BALANCED again. If a family was raped and tortured to death, then the criminal should be raped and tortured to death, WORSE THAN what they did to their victims. They should be made to feel every fucking inch of what they did, tenfold, back on themselves. They should never die laughing as though they won out in the end, they should be broken, utterly BROKEN, blubbering masses of guilt, regret, and self-pity, without pride, without any bold-faced fronts, without any excuses or lies about their innocence. TORTURED AND RAPED UNTIL THEY ARE A MASS OF QUIVERING FLESH ON THE GROUND and then fed to the other criminals who are waiting their turn for the same, now THAT’S justice. No matter how bad it gets in this world, how poor people are, how many diseases or volcanoes or tsunamis or criminals or sadistic tyrants destroy good people leading good lives, so long as the volcanoes, diseases, tsunamis criminals and tyrants take out a larger number of BAD people leading BAD lives, justice is served. At least there is still an advantage in being good. At least you can look around your devestated life and say, well at least, because I was good, I do not suffer from this additional evil, that the evil-doers suffer. Justice is different from whining or self pity, it isn’t simply wishing life were better for oneself than it is. It isn’t calling for a handout like the advocates of ’social justice’ or being a miser like the advocates of ‘property rights,’ or leaning on a crutch like the advocates of ‘God’s justice.’ It is a fiery wish to punish evil and wrest meaning from this world by force of will, by Making it favor the righteous, by Making the Good become the proud, by Making the decent become the estimable, by Making the beneficent become the happy. If we want to inspire that kind of longing for justice, look for the Tarquins and the Lucreces. Look for the most wonderful girl on earth, the most beloved, kindest, warmest, decent girl on earth, and find the most vile, monstrous, unthinking, unfeeling, jiggaboo who raped, tortured, and murdered her–then walked free with money in his back pocket, a book deal, praise from all the press and a road to the easy life for the rest of his days, and then ask if this is the world we want to live in day in day out, where girls are tortured and raped to death for loving their family’s and decorating easter eggs but thugs are free within the week without a slap on the wrist. Oh wait, we don’t have to look for such stories, here’s one already:
http://cofcc.org/?p=4179
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
13 year old girl murdered.
CofCC.org News Team
Update: The monster the system refused to stop, most likely has at least four female murder victims and multiple attempted murder victims.
Brutal killer was as bad as the monsters in horror movies. He burned a woman alive with lighter fluid in 1987!
This monster was released from prison in 2003. Immediately he was charged with rape, but acquitted by an OJ style jury. Then two more burned female victims were found, in which he is suspect. One of the victims was only 14.
Then he threatens to kill his own 18 month old son in stand off with SWAT. He is slapped on the wrist with a three month sentence. After being released he solicits sex from a 13 year old girl and is sentenced to a year in prison. He is released from prison months early and goes on a violent rampage. His rampage involves burglarizing a man’s house and stabbing the man ten times. It ends with the rape and murder of a beautiful 13 year old girl.
Should have been given the death penalty multiple times, yet allowed to walk the streets by OJ style juries and a broken judicial system. Click Here.
Anthony Kirkland is a violent monster and convicted sex offender. After being released from state prison early he went on a violent crime spree that ended in the brutal murder of a 13 year old girl.
This monster was supposed to have been in State Prison until March 28th, 2009 for a previous crime, but was released months early.
Overflow crowd at funeral. Click Here.
CINCINNATI - An overflow crowd of mourners attended a memorial service Wednesday afternoon to honor 13-year-old Esme Kenney.
The crowd packed St. John’s Unitarian Universalist Church off of Clifton Avenue, and so many people were in attendance that many more were turned away.
Esme Kenney’s Friends: Darkness Has Not Extinguished Her
Several people could be seen waiting outside of the church, hoping to pay their respects after the memorial service was over.
“She was one of the best friends I’ve ever had,” Esme’s friend Erin Long said.
There was a message from the family, to the church community that has worked hard to support them during this unbelievably difficult time.
It spoke of Esme’s death, as a battle between good and evil, between light and darkness.
“The darkness has not extinguished her. And as her parents told us - he will not win,” close friend Lucas Wozniak said.
The circumstances of her death — at this point — still too much for many to talk about.
“Today is about Esme, and remembering her, and we’ll let the justice system do what it needs to do,” Esme’s Sunday school teacher Diana Long said.
“She’s an amazing girl, and everybody loved her, and she’s going to be missed so much,” Erin Long said.
There has been an outpouring of emotion since Kenney’s was found strangled to death Saturday, hours after she failed to return home from a jog.
Convicted killer and sex offender Anthony Kirkland was arrested and charged with murder in her slaying.
Hundreds attended another memorial service Tuesday night that grew so large that the School for the Creative and Performing Arts — where Kenney had been a student — moved the event to the Aronoff Center.
Watch the Report On SCPA Memorial Service
The memorial was packed with students and staff from the school who put on a farewell performance for a beloved classmate.
“We will keep your daughter’s spirit alive and we will cherish the legacy she has left with all of us,” said SCPA Principal Dr. Jonathan Futch.
The choir and the orchestra — Kenney’s two great loves at the school — had a prominent place on stage.
“I’m here, not to be sad, but I’m here to celebrate the life of this phenomenal young lady,” SCPA alumni association member Robby Todd said.
Her sister, Frannie Kenney, was called on stage as Esme Kenney was inducted into the alumni association.
And while there were tears, there was hope for the future.
“In your light Esme, we will overcome evil,” said teacher Laurie Wyant. “We love you, Esme, and your family at SCPA will honor you.”
Plans were discussed for a permanent memorial at the school and a march to raise money for the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
Evolution and Sex
Evolution and Sex
March 18th, 2009In terms of evolution, nothing is more important than reproducing, the entire point of life is to survive until you reproduce, then make sure your children survive until they reproduce, then die and get out of the way. Making reproduction sexual was a necessary cost, even though it greatly magnified the difficulty of reproduction. This is because the entire world is locked into an evolutionary arms race of predator and prey, host and parasite, competition for the same territory and food source, and so on. If one species decided to just remain a stationary target with a stationary genetic code, all the other species would continue adapting until they found the perfect strategy against the stationary target. They would develop a resistance to their immune system, outrun them, detect their camoflauge, make a poison the stationary species could not digest, etc. Soon enough the stationary sitting-duck species would go extinct, victim to the sexual reproduction of its neighbors. Only sexual reproduction creates enough change and diversity each generation that no other species can get a lock on our genome and decode us to be their whipping boys. This quest for diversity also gives women the special power to smell men with a diverse immune system from theirs and be sexually attracted to it, without ever realizing why. The kids from that union would have a more varied immune system and thus be harder for diseases and parasites to lock on to and overcome. So we are stuck with sexual reproduction, it is the only way to compete with all the other life on earth, including other sexually reproducing humans. To fire up the cloning vat, we would have to first separate from all other living beings, who would all quickly, albeit messily and expensively, adapt to our weakness and then exploit it.
There is another advantage to two separate sexes. It allows for the specialization of the species. As we all know in economics, two specialized tradesmen who then trade their work to each other can produce more and better products than both of them producing everything they need for themselves. This is just as true between the sexes. For homo sapiens, men have specialized mentally and physically for war, risk-taking, aggression, innovation, intelligence, systematic and idealistic thinking, and competitiveness. Women have specialized mentally and physically for sociability, attractiveness, intellectual stability (the incidence of insanity and retardedness is far lower in females), detailed and practical thinking, and cooperativeness. Women can also endure painful, denigrating, and tedious situations far better than men. Just look how attentive and studious they are in school, or how they can babysit an infant day after day despite its endless time-consuming but not intellectually challenging needs, or their willingness to work as virtual slaves on farms all around the world without running away or revolting. When the two sexes specialize in their genetically ordained fields, and then trade the products of their specialization, each honoring and valuing the others’ ability and contribution, the world is the richest and best suited for human life. When one good or the other is provided alone, bereft of the other’s contribution, life becomes lopsided and inhospitable for either sex.
So if separate sexes create so many benefits, why then have they caused so much harm in recent history? We have to look at what has changed to see how the fault lines between the sexes have created our current unhappiness. Currently in China and India, infanticide and abortion is used to create more male babies than female. Inevitably this will mean too few females to go around and a lot of lonely boys who will never have a wife, a lover, or a family of his own. This is a curse to these countries, an obvious oversight, that makes little sense. But what if I were to tell you the west is also doing this same thing, and the result is the same here as there?
By abandoning monogamy, we can once again create an unbalanced system where there are too few women to go around and a lot of lonely men who will never be loved or married, who are completely superfluous to society. These women flock around some ‘good prospect’ and ignore any suitors who are likely to have weaker genes than their target. They will delay mating in the hopes of snagging a divorcee (sequential serial marriage is still polygamy) or just randomly getting lucky with the scarce commodity, or perhaps they’ll just artificially inseminate themselves with high quality ‘gene daddys’ and bypass men altogether. Even more sinister is women are perfectly fine with marrying one man and taking all his money, attention, love, and care while actually having another man’s children. If the other man isn’t willing to stick around or cuddle her at night, she can relegate these two roles to different men, getting the high quality genes from one man and high quality upkeep from another. What does she care? From an evolutionary perspective, the name of the game is increasing the chances that her children will survive and reproduce, the feelings of the men she hurts can go jump in a lake. In the past this was fought by mother nature — if the father abandoned the children they would starve to death and die, so it made sense to have the children of the person you actually married, and to not have children with people you don’t marry. This is all gone now. The flood of wealth has allowed women to select immoral choices at no cost to the survivability of their children. After this defense culture offered a second line of trenches, by condemning bastards and unmarried fallen women, keeping them out of inheritances and high-status, high-wealth activity, and in general making the price of non-monogamy too high to evolutionarily take. Luckily women have removed that stigma and culture as well, made divorce, single motherhood, and adultery utterly commonplace and unexceptional, and given their bastard children as high a chance at survival and success as the legitimate children of marriage.
To make matters worse, for some unaccountable reason, 1/3 of white women never have a child. If they do have a childless marriage, it’s an empty shell of what a real marriage is, with no purpose outside of, apparently, fun. More likely they just wander from meaningless relationship to meaningless relationship, working in flings when they’re especially desirous of male companionship (complete with birth control measures) and otherwise working endlessly at their career. If 1/3 of women don’t have a child, that means 1/3 of men (at least) also never have a child, whether they wanted to have one or not. When a woman chooses, she chooses for both sexes, as her participation is absolutely necessary. These men who now have no purpose or reward for being alive tend to drown themselves in alcohol, drugs, work, and meaningless flings of their own. The civilizing and humanizing influences of marriage and children do not reach them, and men allow themselves to become the worst in themselves, as there’s no point being anything else. High rates of crime, domestic violence, gang warfare, and STDs follow as a matter of course. This type of dead-ender lifestyle is not just true of blacks, anyone who has abandoned monogamy and reproduction, any group of men who have been abonded by their women to sterility and purposelessness, engage in the same behaviors. It is an unhappy, empty life, against all natural instincts, against all natural desires, created by an unnatural world of endless wealth, complete cultural non-discrimination, polygamy, careerist women and birth control. It is unimaginable how many women have chosen to raise their children themselves or simply not have any, they have essentially gone on strike and refused to participate in the human species, the one that includes both sexes, the one that includes children and a next generation, the one that includes a meaningful and happy life, the one that includes love, the life that nature has so generously given us as our blessed reason for being. Every time a woman makes that choice, an invisible man somewhere else dies with her, physically and spiritually. His seed is cut off, his spirit is shrivelled for lack of all healthy good things and the poisonous attempts to replace them with corruption and filth, he is dead to the world. Women are committing mass murder on a scale previously unheard of. In Europe, it is like the black death. 1/3 of all Europeans will be depopulated, wiped from existence, in just a couple generations. If it continues, it would end in the extinction of the entire white race. A genocide of a billion people! No man, not even Ghengis Khan, has been so vicious, unfeeling, selfish, or cruel as the collective will of women expressed across the world.
The evolutionary implications of this massive die-off are thus more potent than any epidemic or war that has previously raged across the globe. The men who still manage to have children in this environment, the women still choosing to have children in this environment, will soon be the totality of the new human species, no other type of human will have survived. Who are these men, these women? The worst of all possible people!
Exhibit A: Fat black woman incapable of thinking ahead or putting on birth control, really wants to shag mr. negroid and oops, there’s another baby. Guess welfare will have to pay for it alongside the other 10, oh well, time to shoot up some more crack and forget about it all.
Exhibit B: Some dusky man with no particular virtues except a willingness to beat or kill any of his family members or his wife if they show the tiniest hint of disobediance, dishonor, or wantonness. Through a collective male police state they keep all their women in bodybags, accompanied by escorts and chaperones everywhere they go, and eventually forced to have a dozen children without any use of birth control by said males whose clits are then cut off to help perpetuate the system.
These are currently the only two viable reproductive systems in the world, and thus the only two that will survive into the future. Monogamy, love, marriage, a high investment of deep care and attention to each individual child from both parents — all of that will be gone, myths of some sort of fairy tale bygone days, an alien species with no relation to the current crop of devolved man. Standing athwart this nightmare future are traditionalists, but they cannot do it alone. Like tinkerbell says, everytime a woman says she doesn’t believe in marriage, another male loses his wings. If the world is to have a remotely warm and fuzzy future for mankind, women are going to have to return to monogamy, to boring non-alpha males, to devoting time and effort to children not work, to not divorcing or not cheating just because it’s easy, and caring for ten seconds about the fate of the world and life itself more than themselves and their selfish narrow goals. How can it be done? This crisis is more direct, more imminent, and more fatal than any other. If we cannot change this, the rest will become moot, and very soon.
A Cordial Reply to Our Detractors
A Cordial Reply to Our Detractors
March 30th, 2009
Every now and then, commentors appear declaring they are ’shocked, shocked!’ that a ‘hate’ site like SAS exists and that anyone in the world is stupid enough to believe in ‘racism’ anymore. This is generally followed by a bunch of ‘inbred stupid redneck’ insults and predictions that our type is toast and the rainbow dawn of the age of aquarius will shortly usher in world kumbayah singing. I’ve ceased to be offended by these types and begun to be amused, they are so utterly ignorant of the issues being discussed that nothing they say matters. However, out of a helpful wish to inform the likes of these purveyors why we are the way we are, I thought I could draw up a few points that could give them a chance to objectively view our arguments instead of knee-jerk declaim against them.
First off, there is nothing wrong with being a racist. It is the most natural, healthy, and sensible view in the world. It is evolutionarily adaptive to favor kin and race over foreigners, because they share more of your unique genes than foreigners, and thus helping them helps increase the presence of your genes in the gene pool. Being a racist is just as sensible as being a species-ist or a family-ist, it is simply prioritizing the transmission of your genes into the gene pool over less related genes. Anyone who doesn’t hold this belief is destined to genetic suicide. As noble as it sounds to selflessly ignore evolution, evolution never stops ignoring you. Just as it is death to ignore gravity and jump off a cliff as proof of your more ‘enlightened’ and ‘developed’ beliefs, it is a death sentence to ignore biology and prefer foreign genes to your own. This is especially true when others do not share in your ‘enlightened’ viewpoint. Even if theoretically it would be better if everyone stopped preferring their self, family, ethnicity, race, and species over more genetically foreign elements, if only some people do this while others continue selfishly pursuing their genetic interests, the world will quickly become solely dominated by the selfish, genetically-minded agenda pursuers. Therefore, even anti-racists would be best served to promote racism in the short term, as a tit-for-tat measure against the incredibly racist foreigners who are perfectly content to eradicate others for their own genetic gain.
Putting aside the long-term consequences of ignoring evolution, there are many other reasons to be a racist. It has been shown in study after scientific study that people prefer the company of people like themselves. People sort genetically in a natural process called ‘assortative mating.’ We have a natural affinity for people who share traits with ourselves, and a natural dislike for people unlike ourselves. At this point, I’m not even discussing whether the people unlike ourselves are bad people. They might be wonderful people, but their foreign-ness is bad enough all on its own. This is why the vast majority of everyone on earth finds a husband or wife who shares as much in common with themselves as possible, including race. It is why the vast majority of people on earth prefer friends of their own race, a church group of their own race, a school of their own race, a town of their own race, a country of their own race, so that wherever they go they can interact with people like themselves instead of foreigners, who are scary and unlikable and weird-looking. Fighting against this instinct is counterproductive and about as useful as fighting against the instinct to eat, breathe, pump your heart, sleep, drink, etc. It is an inborn nature to all mankind and the only way to get rid of it would be to redesign the human genome. Where did this instinct come from? See above! It is an evolutionarily fit activity to prefer your own genes to foreign genes, and thus all humanity evolved this preference, and now it is an inborn wish, an inborn motivation to carry out the evolutionarily fit activity–just the same as procreation became an enjoyable and desirable act because it helped replicate your genes and was thus an evolutionarily fit activity. It is as useless to combat people’s innate ‘hatred’ for foreign genes and love for related genes as the sex drive, the appetite, or any other fundamental human emotions. Given we are human and have a human nature, it is important we find a lifestyle that suits our inbuilt desires and needs, rather than one that tries to twist us out of shape. Every time human nature is assaulted, it hurts rather than helps. When communism attempted to root out ’selfishness’ it killed 100 million people, but it didn’t even last a century before everyone had given up on it as hopeless. Why then should we start another doomed crusade against human nature, this time racism?
Then there is the little problem that races are unequal. If people were all equally good, but didn’t like each other simply because they were foreign or strange or ‘not like themselves,’ at least some argument could be made against satisfying our innate racist wishes. This is not the case. There is a vast range of differences between the races, and these differences are genetic not cultural. There is no way to bridge these gaps, even if you became dictator of the whole world and designed every single person’s diet, upbringing, schooling, job opportunities, wealth, religion, language, etc. Nurture and the environment are only so powerful. Everyone in the whole world will admit that a giraffe cannot be raised to be a human, if only it is given the right environment and ‘culture.’ In that case, lurking in the depths of everyone’s brain is the realization that the basis of human intellect and achievement is genetic. That we have genes that code for our intelligence, our behavior, our personality, and so on. Now that we’ve all admitted that genes are the reason behind differences between the species, why is it is so surprising or impossible to think that genes are also the reason behind differences within the species? In fact, scienctists have reached a consensus that intelligence within humans is 80% genetic and only 20% cultural. A vast deal of studies have been done on the matter, most especially twin studies that compare the results of identical twins versus fraternal twins, who share all the same environments but are less or more closely genetically related. There is really no question left in the scientific community as to the truth of this matter, nor is there any dispute as to the accuracy or validity of IQ tests, nor is there any disputing the powerful causitive relationship low IQ has with social degeneracy–whether it’s illegitimate children, poverty, crime, dropping out of school, unhealthy habits, or STD’s. Therefore we are stuck in a world where some races are inherently, genetically, smarter than others and thus the incidence of social degeneracy is inherently, genetically lower among those races than others. It is common sense to prefer the company of people who on average have lower social degeneracy rates than those people who on average have higher social degeneracy rates. Requiring we live around the scum of the earth, criminals, welfare leeches, homeless stinking beggars, retards, alcoholics, etc, just to prove we aren’t racists is unacceptable. If it means that much to you, you go do it. However, some of us wish to live, some of us wish to feel safe in our homes. Some of us want to give a bright future to our children. Some of us want a decent wholesome environment we can take walks in and enjoy looking upon. Some of us are still sane. Now, the moment you find the cure for low intelligence, and cure all the less intelligent races of their social degeneracy, you can come back to the bargaining table and insist it will be different this time. However, for the last century we have lived cheek by jowl with the worst scum of the earth, and they have done nothing but rob us, rape us, murder us, pass affirmative action laws against us, demean us, ruin our schools, ruin our infrastructure, ruin our economies, and so on. It is unfair and wicked to demand whites and other civilized races must continue to bear the burden of a degeneracy not of their own making and not their responsbility.
In fact, nurturing genetic under-achievers with environmental handouts their own genome never could have produced is a dysgenic ticking time bomb. For example, say Person A and Person B are in a giant maze. Person A has the ability to navigate the maze, and can also show Person B the way out. Person B would be lost in the maze forever without Person A, but since Person A is there to help, this is insignificant. Person B meanwhile has a killer smile that attracts the ladies. So long as Person A helps Person B get out of the maze, natural selection will not favor either individual. However, sexual selection will continue to favor Person B. Thus, in a few generations, Person A will go extinct and Person B will populate the whole world. At this point, and for the first time, natural selection suddenly kicks in as Person B still can’t navigate mazes and thus they all go extinct as well. This is the case in the world today. The majority of the world is stupid and cannot sustain itself, but this drawback has no evolutionary impact so long as smart people continue to support them out of their own generosity. These same people have higher birthrates, and thus are continuously expanding their proportion of world population. At some point smart people will go extinct, as there is no natural selection or sexual selection favoring them, since they foolishly waste their own advantages by sharing it out equally with their less endowed inferiors. Then the dumb people will also go extinct, as they still cannot sustain themselves without the help of smart people. It is in the interest of dumb people that they are not sustained above their own ability to sustain themselves, so that negative traits do not proliferate only to crash later on. It is also in the interest of smart people to not undermine their own advantages and thus destroy eons of human evolution that got us to the wonderful traits we currently enjoy. Rather than regressing to some primitive, unsustainable population by coddling our stupidest and weakest, the human race should be devoting its time to the expansion and support of our finest specimens, our smartest, most beautiful, most moral, most admirable men and women. Soon enough, the whole world could be populated by those people best equipped to live in it. Then the continuous tragedies of stuff like AIDS and malaria in Africa, slum cities, poverty, alcoholism, corruption and crime could all be averted, because the people who engage in that behavior would go extinct, while the people who engage in high culture and civilization will have grown and grown. More clean cities, more pristine parks, more safe neighborhoods, more stable homes, more well-educated children, more orchestras, more books being read, more everything desirable and happy in humanity. With eugenics, we could solve most of the problems on earth in a painless fashion, simply by favoring the birth rates of those best suited to life and disfavoring the birth rates of those least suited to life. With the current liberal plan of enhancing every poor and dumb person’s life so that they can do just as well or better than rich, smart people, we reverse evolution and make sure that poor and dumb people will proliferate indefinitely–and their social degeneracy, misery, and ruination will proliferate with them. Where is the sense in that? If we can all agree that we like security, prosperity, and dignity for everyone where is the sense in making the people least able to confer these advantages or receive these advantages the vessels of our cause? Where is the sense in trying to create the perfect device out of the least perfect parts we can find? The perfect society out of the weakest links? We all want a good environment, a good nurturing for our children and the future of humanity. The only question is, should this environment be wasted like pearls before swine, or provided for the people who can truly benefit from it, the ones most genetically gifted and suited to such an environment, nurturing, and future?
Ask yourself what you really want to see in the world. World peace? Justice? An end to poverty, disease, and hunger? An end to all abused children? Equality and freedom for all? Now ask yourself, will this be easier or harder to achieve with smart people or dumb people? Will this be easier or harder to achieve with mean people or nice people? Will this be easier or harder to achieve with liars or honest people? Will this be easier or harder to achieve with vicious or virtuous people? Will this be easier or harder to achieve with ignorant or educated people? Whatever you want, any possible liberal wet dream, is achievable only, and solely through eugenics. You can bet we ‘racists’ want all those things too. The only difference is we know the truth, we understand reality, and we intend to actually achieve those results, while all liberals have ever achieved and will ever achieve is catastrophe.
A Cordial Reply to ‘X’
A Cordial Reply to ‘X’
March 31st, 2009you are an idiot. You have only proven that intelligence differs from person to person not race to race. Where is the scientific proof that we are inherently biologically different and if this is the case how does this prove white people are better. You think your pseudo scientific inference somehow makes you seem like you know what you are talking about. Next time when you write an article and you want to make such baseless claims you should try referencing your sources. All of you who are lapping up this person’s propaganda are even more foolish. This website is created by a bunch of morons who want everything handed to them by virtue of their race. Stop blaming your problems on others and man up you cowards. These type of beliefs are stoneage stuff man. Get over yourselves. The world around you is going to keep changing. Get used to it. You can’t change anything, the old days are over I mean how can you people live a happy life if you are constantly carrying round this burden of hate. Man I have such pity for you people.
So says X on my previous post. This comment is a real gold mine to be fully explored and fully exploited, so here we go.
First let’s start with the writing style. He starts by calling me an idiot, then calls us all cowards, then mentions we’re living in the stone age (as though racism hasn’t existed everywhere at all times including the height of the enlightenment), and pities us because we are so burdened down with hate. Between all these personal insults of people he doesn’t even know there is very little concrete to latch onto. Since I know myself rather well, and the people of SAS a lot better than X, I’ll just suggest that we are not idiots, cowards, cave men, living in the past, or bogged down with hate. We are an ever-present faction of the human psyche, the faction that cares about family and the future. We’ve been in power before, and we will be in power again, when enough tragedy has occurred that people are sick of liberal lies and convinced we were right all along. I am looking forward to that future, and I’m excited about all the wonderful things we could do once we reach it. It’s no burden at all to have a cause, or be a part of something greater than yourself. It’s a blessing.
Now, the one other thing X said is I had no proof that the races were genetically different in IQ, or that whites had a higher IQ than blacks. Then he lectured me on not using footnotes and hyperlinks and references. My question to X is, if you were given the sources and proof and evidence, would you read them? Would you study the evidence? Would you investigate my claims? Because I really hate gathering evidence and proof when the other side will simply ignore it and continue mouthing the same insults and knee-jerk claims. Do you think I haven’t had these arguments before? The next step, after I provide the evidence, is people claiming the websites and authors of the evidence are all racists and ‘hate literature’ can’t be trusted to be true. So then I will find some other source in the hopes they’ll approve of the author, and days later they’ll say the case isn’t solid enough and the study was flawed etc etc. Nevertheless, as a gesture of good will to ‘X’ and those like him, here you go. Proof that the race’s are biologically different and the white race is superior in terms of IQ:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_Global_Inequality
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:
National_IQ_Lynn_Vanhanen_2006_IQ_and_Global_Inequality.png
In case you’re wondering, in that picture, purple is best, blue is second best, green is third, yellow 4th, red the worst. That, my friend, is the picture of the entire intelligence of the world and all its races, carefully studied and laid out for you, and the complete story of human intelligence. There’s really nothing more needed than this one single map to explain all world history, all politics, and the dire need for racial separation and separate development. But why stop there?
http://www.vdare.com/rushton/080616_lynn.htm
http://www.charlesdarwinresearch.org/Race_Evolution_Behavior.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bell_Curve
http://www.vdare.com/sailer/070812_hart.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Accomplishment
http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/g.htm
Now, if ‘X’ and all those like him wish, they can read the literature, the books and websites on the issue, and then come back to it with an informed opinion, like I have. Or they can call us more names, call the writers of the books names, and then cite some liberal PC author who has ‘discredited’ all these books by saying they are wrong. Sorry, but if you actually read the books, you will realize the case is far too strong to be ‘discredited’ by liberal professors who are lying through their teeth every time they open their mouth. But we all know that won’t happen. How can you look down upon and pity people if they are right and you were wrong? Better to stay ignorant of the facts, sources, and studies, so that the liberal lala-land can continue, right? This is how one liberal originally delved into the sources and literature, showed that the evidence was overwhelming and conclusive that race and IQ are genetically determined, and then changed his mind and weaseled out of it by attacking the authors of the science instead of the science itself:
http://www.slate.com/id/2178122/entry/2178123/
Liberals can’t be honest about this argument, they cannot simply sit down and look at the evidence, their egos are too much at stake. It is rare to find a single honest liberal. Someone who admits the truth, follows the evidence, and still comes to the conclusion that we need a one-world socialist government dedicated to helping all people regardless of their worth without any restriction on birth rates, taxes, welfare, etc etc. This would be a wonderful debating partner, someone I could honestly discuss politics and morality with, but until that day comes, we must continue dealing with the “X’s” of the world. However, I offer this as a challenge to all liberals who come here intent on insulting us. Suppose everything we believe is true. Suppose blacks aren’t even human beings, suppose there are vast genetic differences between the races and whites and northeast asians are the only people who will ever excel and live high quality lives, suppose the mass procreation and mass immigration of blacks and others is in fact threatening to genocide whites off the entire face of the planet. What’s your solution? What would you do? Just consider for an instant, hypothetically, if every fact we believe is true. What, then, would be your opinions? How would you deal with these issues? What would you want to see done? How are you different from us?
Are Jewish and white Interests Compatible?
Are Jewish and White Interests Compatible?
April 10th, 2009First off, people might question why I consider jews a separate group from the rest of the white race.
This is why: “http://www.white-history.com/refuting_rm/2.html”
“http://scienceblogs.com/gnxp/2009/01/
how_ashkenazi_jewish_are_you.php”
Scroll down a bit and take a look at the scatter plots. As you can see jews form an island of genetic diversity completely separate from whites. They act as a sort of bridge between the middle east and Europe, neither one nor the other. Why should they be considered white? They don’t overlap with any standard European country — france, the USA, italy, germany, britain, russia, etc. They have nothing to do with our genes. This doesn’t mean they are bad people, japanese have even less genetic relatedness to the white genome, but I certainly respect them. However, it does mean they are not one of us, which should put people into a heightened sense of awareness and risk when dealing with them.
With that settled, the next question is, are jews symbiotes to the white race? Perhaps they are completely alien to us genetically, but so are bacteria in our gut that help us digest food. Without them we would all die, but they aren’t even human much less white bacteria. Here is the problem with that. Whites have built countries and thrived without jews all throughout time and space. Many white countries performed at the peak of their game without any jewish influence whatsoever, while other white countries chock full of jews were poor and backwards. Consider Poland and Russia before WWII, these two countries included most of the jews in the entire world, and yet they were both dictatorships with poor human rights records, poor, uneducated, technologically backwards and culturally empty. If jews were symbiotes to the white race, there should be some visible pattern where the more jews in your country, the better off their whites. Instead we see a completely different pattern: Jews enter a country, rise to a certain threshold, then the country collapses or the jews are expelled by violent and angry natives. This is the pattern of European history, not a kumbayah singing holding hands between jews and whites people have been led to believe. Jews have been expelled from some 50 different countries. Sometimes the same country more than once!
“http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/expelled.htm”
What could the jews have been doing to create such chaos and resentment? Let me count the ways:
Bela Kun, jew, in Hungary led a communist revolt, massacring thousands of innocent white Hungarians in his brief reign of power.
Jews instigated a failed communist revolution against Weimar Germany.
Jews assassinated the Czar of Russia and led the bolshevik revolution. 30 million whites later died to the depredations of a wholly jewish controlled bureaucracy and secret police service under Lenin and Stalin. Don’t believe me? Just see what Churchill had to say about the matter:
“http://www.solargeneral.com/mirrors/Flawless%20Logic%20Library/library.flawlesslogic.com/ish.htm”
“This movement amongst the Jews (the Russian Revolution) is not new. From the days of Spartacus Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kuhn (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany) and Emma Goldman (United States), this world wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and the reconstruction of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs. Nesta Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the Nineteenth Century; and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities has gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistic Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from Jewish leaders.” (ibid)
“There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews. It is certainly a very great one; it probably outweighs all others. With the notable exception of Lenin, the majority of the leading figures are Jews. Moreover, the principal inspiration and driving power comes from the Jewish leaders. Thus Tchitcherin, a pure Russian, is eclipsed by his nominal subordinate Litvinoff, and the influence of Russians like Bukharin or Lunacharski cannot be compared with the power of Trotsky, or of Zinovieff, the Dictator of the Red Citadel (Petrograd), or of Krassin or Radek — all Jews. In the Soviet institutions the predominance of Jews is even more astonishing. And the prominent, if not indeed the principal, part in the system of terrorism applied by the Extraordinary Commissions for Combating Counter-Revolution has been taken by Jews, and in some notable cases by Jewesses.”
Aiding these ‘communist’ jews were the ‘capitalist’ jews in New York City, Jacob Shiff and co, who funded anti-russian activity from abroad. Don’t believe me?
“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Schiff”
“During the Russo-Japanese War, in 1904 and 1905, in perhaps his most famous financial action, Schiff, again through Kuhn, Loeb & Co., extended a critical series of loans to Japan, in the amount of $200 million.[15] He was willing to extend this loan due, in part, to his belief that gold is not as important as national effort and desire, in helping win a war, and due to the apparent underdog status of Japan at the time; no European nation had yet been defeated by a non-European nation in a modern, full-scale war. It is quite likely Schiff also saw this loan as a means of avenging, on behalf of the Jewish people, the anti-Semitic actions of the Tsarist regime, specifically the then-recent pogroms in Kishinev.”
All for the sake of the jews. Jews don’t ask what political system you belong to, they simply ask: “is it good for the jews?” If it is, they support it. That is why they could care less if they are religious or atheist jews, capitalist or communist jews, or whatever red herring constantly playing at white heart-strings. They keep their eye on the prize, “is it good for the jewish race?” That’s the only criteria to any belief. Once the belief has served its purpose, they doff it like chameleons. Nothing is sacred to the jews save themselves.
Jewish treachery and revolution goes further back than the 1900’s however. They rebelled against the Roman Empire even though they were given preferential treatment there. They aided the muslim conquest of Spain in the most vile of acts imaginable:
“http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/medieval/articles/muslimhorde.aspx”
Ziyad in turn dug in along the cost and sent for reinforcements. With the 5,000 Berber reinforcements Nusair sent, along with the 7,000-man force originally sent over, Ziyad had an array of some 21,000 troops. As Bendiner reports, this Muslim force was also added to by
a handful of Visigothic exiles each seeking his own revenge. Allies began to flock into the camp. These included many of the discontented in Spain, but principally the Jews, who had been expecting and praying for such a deliverance. Now they offered to fight for it and some of them sparked local uprisings to pave the way for the Muslims.[41]
Bendiner, however, states that Ziyad “dispatched a lieutenant with seven hundred horsemen to capture Cordoba. That the city held out for three months and was finally taken only with the help of impatient Jews and dissident Christians within the walls.”[52] Bendiner also states that Ziyad’s “advance guard was made up of Jews and Christians who had gone over to the invaders. The Christians were probably serfs who would eagerly join in the hosannahs to liberation.”[53]
This meant that the Jewish population, which quickly began to increase as those that had fled to North Africa began to return, was free to live as equals, as long as they paid their infidel poll tax—the Christians, also being infidels, were expected to pay this same poll tax as well. As Bendiner states, “Never had the Jews known such toleration since the Romans abandoned their pantheon.”[58] Therefore, the Jewish population of Andalusia not only became endeared to their Muslim rulers, but wholeheartedly supported them. Nusair even used them to garrison the cities he had taken while he and his Arab cavalry made their advance through the peninsula.[59]
Is it good for the jews for musliims to conquer Europe? According to the jews of the day, yes. (And according to the jews of today!) And according to the jews of the day, that’s all that mattered. Never mind the ramifications it would have for the next 800 years of oppressed white christians. And this is the group of symbiotes whites cannot live without?
Karl Marx, famously, was himself a jew, and the most fervent and stolid supporters of communism all over the world have always been jews. It was jewish traitors in the US, the Rosenbergs who gave the USSR the atomic bomb. It was jewish traitors who gave away Eastern Europe to the USSR at the bargaining table after WWII. For 50 years they had to suffer under crushing poverty and the inability to express themselves through speech or religion. Jews were behind the 1960’s end to segregation in the US and more importantly, jews passed the hart-cellar act, the immigration act of 1965 that opened the US borders up to non-whites. This single bill has doomed almost half of the white population on earth to eventual annihilation through non-white incursion. Jews voted for Obama 80%, McCain (who is hardly any better) 20%. They are the most liberal group in America, and it isn’t just their votes that sway the white west towards suicidal liberalism. They have professors all throughout the college system, they control every major media network (except fox news) and Hollywood, and they as 50% of the country’s billionaires make massive campaign donations to the candidates of their choice — always liberal and always disastrous to the white people. Whether it’s being soft on crime, tough on guns, soft on immigration, heavy on taxes and redistribution to minorities, affirmative action — you name it jews support it and whites suffer under it. As if this weren’t enough, jews recently managed to receive trillions of dollars in support of their jewish run banks in the form of ‘bailouts’ (GOLDMAN SACHS? LOEB? Just look at the names folks) at the cost of white taxpayers. This organized thievery is simply a wealth transfer from whites to jews in numbers almost unimaginable. When they aren’t legally stealing our money, they are illegally achieving it through weasels like Bernie Madoff, a jew who personally stole 50 billion dollars. More than all the black muggings you can add together for the last decade no doubt!
Jews were behind the collapse of South Africa, they were the main agitators for communism and Helen Zille is still in parliament today.
“http://www.davidduke.com/general/exposing-the-hidden-hand-of-jewish-extremism-and-its-effect-on-south-africa_8876.html”
“Dr Pike (p 212-3) quotes from a South African Government Gazette Extraordinary (vol VI 16 Nov 1962 pp 2-28) which listed ‘persons who have been office-bearers, officers, members or active supporters of the Communist Party of South Africa’. The list included 66 ‘clearly identifiable as Jews’, 61 ‘white non-Jews’ and two uncertain. At the time, the South African population was approximately 3 million whites, while the South African Jewish population was 110 000 (World Almanac 1958 p270). So there was approximately one Jew for every 26 white non-Jews in the country. If there had been an equal distribution of Communist involvement between non-Jewish whites and Jews, the Jewish membership of the Communist Party should have been one-twenty-sixth the white Gentile representation. Instead, we find slightly more Jews as members. In other words, Jews were almost thirty times more likely to become members of the Communist Party than were white Gentiles. If Jews with non-Jewish names were also counted, the ratio would be likely to have been considerably higher.”
To this day, jews like Jared Diamond, Boaz, and Gould spin ridiculous theories about human equality, showing how IQ is equal across the board and only white racism explains the pathetic performance of non-whites across the world. After long and convoluted arguments, full of fraud and outright lies, it always boils down to this: ‘you are a racist if you don’t believe me.’ The very term ‘racism’ itself was invented by the communist jew, Trotsky! For around 100 years jews have suppressed the truth of scientific racism, the simple facts that different races vary genetically and some are better than others. This is really rich, because every study shows that above all races, jews are the absolute smartest. With averages of 115 IQ, they are as much smarter than whites as whites are smarter than african-americans. In an attempt to muddle the mixture, however, jews attempt to camouflage this fact, and the fact of their incredible disproportionate membership in seats of power and wealth — at the cost of importing millions of rapists and murderers into our neighborhoods. What do they care about that? Is it good for the jews to deny race differences in intelligence? Check? Ok then we will deny it. That is as far as their thinking ever goes. And what’s good for the jews, is NOT good for the whites. Until whites recognize the importance of race differences in intelligence, personality, and behavior we will never create a rational state that legislates on the basis of these facts. We will never have a secure, prosperous, and autonomous nationalism that could use eugenics to improve the human stock indefinitely towards a true new man with all of our strengths but none of our weaknesses. God knows what our potential as whites could be, if jews simply stopped lying and deceiving our people into the exact opposite course — degrading and destroying all white countries worldwide for the sake of blacks, muslims, mexicans, and all the rest of the inferior drivel of the earth.
Now, my opponents could say I’m simply cherry-picking. “Over the course of two thousand years, of course it’s easy to list all the crimes jews have done while ignoring every good thing they ever did, and paint a picture that demonizes them. However, only an accurate assessment that lists everything good about jews alongside all the cherry-picked negatives could fairly assess whether jewish and white interests are compatible.”
Very well, here is everything good the jews have done:
“http://www.jinfo.org/”
Feel free to peruse at your leisure. Some really amazing contributions can be found like this one:
At least 178 Jews and persons of half- or three-quarters-Jewish ancestry have been awarded the Nobel Prize,1 accounting for 23% of all individual recipients worldwide between 1901 and 2008
Jewish Recipients of the US National Medal of Science (170 recipients, 38% of total)
Of the one hundred leading virtuoso performers of the twentieth century listed at http://www.muzieklijstjes.nl/100players.htm, approximately two-thirds of the violinists, half the cellists, and forty percent of the pianists were, or are, Jews. Of the one hundred leading conductors of the twentieth century listed at http://www.muzieklijstjes.nl/100conductors.htm, approximately one-fourth were, or are, Jews. Among the leading classical composers, the Jewish representation is only about ten percent (cf., Great Composers). Jewish composers have, however, played a predominant role in both the development of the American musical theater and in the development of film music; approximately one-half of the membership of the Songwriters Hall of Fame is Jewish.
The isolation and development of penicillin by Sir Ernst Chain. Chain shared the 1945 Nobel Prize for this work with Sir Alexander Fleming+ and Sir Howard Florey+. It was Chain who recognized the potential of Fleming’s+ nearly forgotten discovery of the antibacterial properties of Penicillium molds (one of many agents then known to have such properties). Chain, a biochemist, was able to isolate the active antibacterial substance, viz., penicillin, and to work out its molecular structure. Using samples that Chain produced, Chain and Florey+ demonstrated penicillin’s stability, nontoxicity, and effectiveness against staphylococcal, streptococcal, and clostridial infections in laboratory animals and humans.
The development of the Salk and Sabin polio vaccines by Jonas Salk and Albert Sabin, respectively. The discovery that the causative agent in polio was, in fact, a virus was made in 1908 by Karl Landsteiner and Erwin Popper.
Now ask yourself, is it worth it? Cures to diseases, economic models, higher mathematics, computer science, nobel prizes in physics, great music, great literature, ladle it on! The jews are wizards, their intellect is supreme. Everything they touch turns to gold. But is it worth it? Fifty countries over 2,000 years all thought so, until they expelled their jews or were destroyed by them. But all 50 learned the hard bitter truth that it’s never worth it. That the jews bring with their excellence such a pernicious political poison, such a fraudulent and self-centered way of life, that to deal with jews is akin to deals with the devil. They never work out the way they first seem, and in exchange for temporary gains you suffer permanent losses. What’s the use? What’s the use of all these jewish contributions (and more — heck who didn’t like natalie portman’s and harrison ford’s performance in star wars?) if in the end it comes at the cost of the annihilation of your race? That’s the only bargain jews ever drive. ‘Let us in, and you must also let in every last chinese, indian, mexican, african, and space alien and give them all welfare and interbreed with all of them.’ It operates almost by magic. They gain the political, media, and financial power, then they create the social atmosphere, and soon enough they control your culture, which in turn controls the very genetic nature of your society. It isn’t worth it. Fifty or a hundred years or so after they arrive, you will be sorry. All their art, medicine, and flashy gizmos aside, you will be sorry. Germany was sorry. Russia was sorry. Spain was sorry. South Africa was sorry. And the USA will soon be sorry. The Palestinians are certainly sorry for letting jews get a toehold there in the 1800’s! Everyone, everywhere, has always been sorry they ever were infested with jews. Let’s not make the same mistake again. Fifty times is enough to know jews and whites can never live together. Fifty tries is enough to know we are not compatible. Just let the dream die. A nation must consist of a genetic and cultural unity, it cannot afford the jews. Jews belong in Israel, their own nation of their own culture and ethnicity. They can enrich it or despoil it all they please, far away from us. And if they invent the cure to cancer, well we can just buy it from them. No jews on our soil needed. For the same reason it’s possible to watch anime without millions of japanese co-citizens. All jewish ‘pros’ have to do with goods that don’t require their physical presence. We can import their music, art, math, literature, computers, etc. All their ‘cons’ have to do with their actual presence. Their involvement in local politics, their voting records, their local news reporting, their financial schemes, their professorships, etc. Even if jews are the greatest thing since sliced bread due to their numerous human accomplishments, that is no argument to live around them — only to learn from them and consume their products. For a good neighbor, the desired traits are a little different: I want them to love me, to protect me, to speak well of me to others, to sacrifice themselves for my sake, to take care of me when I’m down and out of luck, to look like me, to embody my spirit and ideals, to make me proud that I belong to them. This isn’t asking much, this is what co-ethnics, co-nationals regularly do for each other. But it’s impossible to ask such a thing of the jews. They have never done so, and never will. When is the last time jews have volunteered for the military to defend whites from harm? When is the last time jews have praised whites across history and white culture? (Recall susan sontag? “Whites are the cancer of human history.” That’s pretty much all you’ll ever hear from jews about whites) When is the last time jews have been on the same ideological page as whites? (First they weren’t christian, then they weren’t conservative.) When have jews ever given to white charities? It’s always jewish or third world charities. When have jews, in short, ever acted like good neighbors? When have they ever had our back? They are better at stabs in the back.
Beneath the Veneer
Beneath the Veneer
April 13th, 2009http://cofcc.org/?p=4758
Second sex scandal hits Oprah’s South African school.
CofCC.org News Team
It is perhaps the nicest school in South Africa. It has it’s own beauty salon and yoga studio. But Oprah’s $40 million all girls boarding school can’t escape the fact that well, THIS IS AFRICA!
To protect the students from outside rapists, Oprah had to enact all sorts of security measures. In fact, part of the reason for the school being a boarding school is to protect the girls from rapists. Rape is extremely common throughout sub-Saharan Africa. Young girls are especially targeted, due to the widespread belief that sex with a virgin cures diseases such as HIV/AIDS.
However, a school matron was accused of molesting 15 girls shortly after the school opened.
Now, four students have been expelled and three others suspended. It turns out that the girls were bullying other girls into providing sexual favors.
A group of international doctors known as CIET recently interviewed 4,000 South African women. One out of three said they had been raped in the past year alone! A survey of 1,500 male school children showed that one out of four engaged in gang rapes. Read article from BBC.
Oprah herself is a victim of the Negro affinity for sexual violence. As a young girl Oprah was raised by her grandmother in Mississippi. At age six she was sent to her mother in Milwaukee. At age nine she was raped by her cousin. By the time she was 13 she had also been sexually molested by her uncle and her mother’s boyfriend. Then she went to Nashville to live with her father.
Obama’s brother barred from UK over alleged sex attack.
CofCC.org News Team
http://cofcc.org/?p=4751
TOTAL U.S. MEDIA BLACKOUT EXPOSED!
Obama’s half brother could not even attend Obama’s inauguration because his fingerprints link him to a sexual attack on a 13 year old girl in the UK.
Barack Obama’s half-brother Samson Obama was denied entry into the UK last January. He planned to enter the UK and join other Obama relatives in flying to Washington DC for Barack Obama’s presidential inauguration.
However, Samson was denied entry into the UK for allegedly sexually attacking a 13 year old English girl on a previous visit to the UK!
Berkshire police say Samson was in the UK last November and approached a group of teenage girls. He attacked a 13 year old. The girls fled into a cafe and Samson chased them. The cafe owner called police and chased Samson away.
Samson was arrested but gave police a fake id. He told police he was an asylum seeker. Under Britain’s liberal criminal law Samson was allowed to go free while the investigation continued. Samson immediately fled to Nairobi. Berkshire police then matched his fingerprints to Obama’s half-brother.
Samson’s mother, Mum Kezia, lives in the UK close to where the attack took place. After learning Samson’s true identity he was barred from entering the UK.
Obama’s father had four wives, and fathered eight children. His first wife Mum Kezia was only 15 when he purchased her from her family for 14 cows. With this wife he fathered Abongo, Auma, Bernard, and Abo who goes by Samson.
Barack Obama Sr. then married Ann Dunham while still married to his first wife. Ann was the daughter of two hard-core Marxists and believed she was striking a blow against the establishment by having sex with non-white men. She gave birth to Barack. Obama Sr. then abandoned her and she filed for divorce. Immediately after the divorce she married an Indonesian man. Obama Sr. then married a second white leftist, Ruth Nidesand. She returned to Nairobi with Obama Sr. She had two kids with him, David and Mark, before leaving him and marrying another African man.
Obama Sr. went to work as a government official where he published numerous papers advocating “African Socialism.” He married another Kenyan woman and had another baby named George.
Obama Sr. lost his job and his legs after a drunk driving accident. A few years later he died in a second drunk driving accident.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
What’s interesting about these articles isn’t particularly the ‘typical kaffir behavior,’ it’s the fact that the immediate relatives to such ‘luminaries’ and ‘black leaders’ and ‘black historical figures’ like Oprah and Obama are child rapists. This means that people sharing most of Oprah’s genes, and most of Obama’s genes, are child rapists. What does this mean when we say stuff like, “obama and oprah prove blacks are equal to whites?”
The fact is, the rare black who actually leads a responsible life or does something great, is surrounded even in his immediate family by rapists, thugs, and human filth — and due to regression to the mean, it is likely the children of these luminaries, or their children, or what have you, will also revert to rapists, thugs, and human filth. This means not even Obama and Oprah, among reasonable people, would be accepted as fellow citizens. Their genes are walking time bombs, the ‘chimp mode’ somewhere in their DNA will come out again, it is only a matter of time, one, two, or three generations down the line.
Quality isn’t something appraised in a day, or a lifetime. Quality is something achieved through millennium of careful breeding and selection, just like how humans evolved our crops from teosinte and crab apples to the lush bountiful and tasty crops of today. That process has forged the white race in a careful, thorough and age-old crucible, but hasn’t touched the happy-go-lucky primates of Africa one bit. The poorest white children in America still score higher on their SAT’s than the children of the richest blacks. IE, quality cannot be transferred across black generations vertically or across black family members horizontally. A quality black is completely isolated and on his own, doomed to vanish in the mist of time.
Whereas a black luminary is a mutant, a white luminary is the norm. It is likely the child’s family line is full of great men who have achieved great things. Perhaps like in the roman times they are a line of nobility, with statues of former consuls, senators, and generals in the halls of state honoring their contribution to the nation. Perhaps they come from a long line of sailors and explorers, of prosperous farmers, or ingenious inventors. Their brothers and sisters will all be doctors, engineers, and mathematicians, doing their own impressive deeds and leading eminently moral lives themselves. And surrounded by all these high quality genes, immersed in an environment equal to themselves, they are honed to their utmost luminosity, rather than a black hero who inevitably is abandoned by their parents, molested as children, and lord knows what. A white with these features can rest assured to find a compatible and lifelong partner who will raise a new generation of beautiful brilliant white children who share in the same elevated qualities the parents hold, whereas a black is doomed to some temporary fling with a 72% illegitimacy rate, and kids well below their parent’s quality who can never aspire to the same heights due to regressing to the black mean of 70 IQ instead of the white mean of 100 IQ.
What looks like two equal people, beneath the veneer, have two utterly different lives, two utterly different destinies, and two utterly different results. ‘Equality’ as proven by examples like Obama and Oprah are mere illusions, and should be treated as such.
The End TImes are Coming
The End Times Are Coming
April 20th, 2009
There is something fascinating about this era, that makes me glad I was born during the 20th century rather than any previous one. I’m not that interested in the air conditioning, the good food, the antibiotics. Psychology has already shown that people adjust to their living environments and happiness is not based on external factors but purely internal ones. A lot of it is simply genetic, the rest is based on your outlook on life. Hope and gratitude get you further than any number of air conditioned rooms, good meals, and antibiotics. In fact, when you take everything into account, I’m firmly of the opinion that people were much happier in the past than they are today. Life was simpler, you were always surrounded by family, you knew everyone in the village, you had an assured place in life, a farm or a trade you could inherit. There was little crime, very little divorce. A man kept his word, and a woman kept her virtue.
These, however, are gloomy times. When I look at people drinking or dancing like the world is some big party and they aren’t worried about anything, I feel like I’m watching a horror movie and can only think about how soon it’s all going to come crashing down. If you’ve ever watched Terminator 2, you know what I’m feeling. Kids playing on the playground, making sandcastles, going around and around on the merry-go-round, swinging on the swings and sliding down the slide. They won’t listen to the girl screaming at the fence, they ignore her, even though she’s shaking it as hard as she can to get their attention. Like so many ants all about to be squished, so much activity but none of it, NONE of it in the least helping to save their lives. And then BOOM, the nuke goes off in the background, the heedless children who did nothing but play until it was too late turn to skeletons, then ash, then it’s just light and flames everywhere. This is the future I know is coming, but no one else knows. Watching people party is just macabre. Watching kids play is horrifying. Watching the world tick, tick, tick to judgment day.
Currently the USA is slated for judgment day on 2042. On that day whites will become the minority of the country and lose the ability to control their lives. They will be surrounded by hateful, envious, vicious minorities all intent on vengeance for the centuries they were ‘oppressed.’ I already know what’s going to happen. I may as well be a visitor from the future. There will be massive, back-breaking taxation. No white will be allowed to keep their money. There will be enormous, out of control crime. Discrimination on all levels of schooling, housing, employment, etc. But none of this will hurt the elites, the traitors who helped make it all possible. They will still be at the top, spinning their webs, escaping all the ruin around them. This slow death will then trail along, an endless whimper like a trapped animal doomed but still alive. Whites in the USA will be trapped inside our borders, trapped and doomed to all the ‘democratically passed’ laws the non-whites will vote in as the legally authorized majority. Trapped by the slavish army conditioned to turn on its own people because they are ‘racists’ and ‘bigots.’ Homeschooling will be banned and our children will be trapped in the liberal indoctrination camps. As early as 2 or 3 years old they will be reciting anti-racist slogans and taught to renounce their parents and report on their parents if they ever say anything ‘racist’ or ‘hateful’ to their kids. Then those kids will be taken away from their parents, because some nanny state official will say it is an ‘unhealthy environment’ for them. And you will never see your children again. They will be taught to hate you just like everyone else does. Just like the janissaries. Christian children kidnapped as kids and raised to destroy their own people, to hate their own people, and serve willingly their evil overlords. However, nothing is keeping this timetable from being accelerated. 2042 is just thirty years away. Just think about that for a second. Thirty years ago was 1979. Carter was about to lose re-election to Reagan. Star Wars: A New Hope had already come out and Empire Strikes Back was about to be released. Pink Floyd and other popular bands still performing today were releasing their albums. That’s thirty years. Thirty years is NOTHING. Not even a third of someone’s life. Nothing. Absolutely nothing. And yet, even thirty years is far too optimistic. Judgment day is coming much sooner.
Obama will pass his amnesty, and 60 million hispanics will flood into the USA. After that, whites, still divided as ever, will continue to lose every election to minorities who aggressively pursue yet more immigration, taxation, and discrimination to keep the white man down. In just a decade it could all be over, history could be ‘accelerated’ and ‘30 years’ could be made true in an instant. What will happen to us then? We won’t die, it won’t be that simple. Many whites will be richer and more powerful than ever. They won’t even notice any changes, or will celebrate them. Many whites will feel exactly the same because they are such sheeple, that they never notice anything a damn day in their lives. But something will die. Something will go extinct that day.
Do you know the story of the olympic torch? It was always kept burning. The fire from the last olympics was then used to light the torch of the next olympics. This way the same fire was transmitted across time, overlooking the holy rites of the olympics in one continuous span. All the athletes, all the fans, the entire greek nation was participating together, across time, in an eternal devotion to God. When you were at the olympics, you were at ALL olympics, and all olympics were with you, right at your side, participating like ghostly legions ahead and behind you. Now forget about the olympics, it’s just a sports event in the end. There was a much more important flame that was always kept burning ever since Greece. This was the spirit of freedom. The spirit of innovation. The spirit of reason. The spirit of beauty. The spirit of art. The spirit of intellectual inquiry. Philosophy. Sculpture. Mathematics. Science itself. The spirit of a military so developed and a people so brave they defeated the entire Persian empire at Marathon, Salamis, and Thermopylae. The spirit of Athens, Sparta, Thebes, Corinth. . .the spirit of Aeschylus, of Hesiod, of Euclid, Aristotle, Plato, Socrates, Archimedes, Homer. This flame was transferred intact to the heart of the Roman Empire. There it burned for centuries on end, overlooking the greatest, most powerful Empire the world had ever seen. Legions added to its luster, each sporting an Eagle banner and a fearsome reputation to all barbarians of invincibility, roads were built spanning continents, Virgil wrote the Aeneid to follow after the Oddyssey. Plutarch wrote his essays on the “Lives” of greek and roman heroes. Tacitus wrote his history. Cicero made his fiery speeches for freedom. Cato taught the world how to live honorably. When the Roman Empire began to fall, the flame was transferred to Byzantium. There it burned, untouched, another thousand years, this time with the symbol of the ‘double-eagle.’ The greek and roman classics were still taught, the great literature rested safely in the great library. The law code, the most developed on earth, still oversaw the Empire justly. The Hagia Sophia was built, one of the most beautiful buildings on earth. And just before Byzantium fell, as though God stepped in again, the sacred flame was saved by Italians interested in their history like Petrarch and Dante. They took all the documents, all the art and sailed it back to Italy, where the Renaissance began. Now the flame added in Michelangelo, and Galileo, and burning outwards into the rest of Europe it consumed Paris, and London, and Germany. Russia married into the Imperial line of Byzantium and proudly sported their own double-eagle. Soon it was producing Dostoevsky, and Tolstoy, and the 1812 overture. Is there any song like it? Is there any other Tchaikovsky on earth? The flame was everywhere, it sailed with Columbus to the new world, it sailed on the voyage of the HMS Beagle as Darwin put together the clues to evolution and survival of the fittest, it sailed in the heads of our founding fathers as Thomas Paine, Thomas Jefferson, and George Washington framed the Constitution of the most glorious, free, happy, and prosperous nation on Earth. And what did we choose to symbolize our new nation? The eagle! And what did all our founding fathers study when they were young? Greek and Latin! They read the classics, they wanted a new Athens, a new Rome, they believed in liberty because the flame had never died, and here it was across an ocean blazing forth into the hearts of all Americans. The flame was at its height, it was everywhere, it had conquered the world. It had proven its innate superiority. It had proven its divine nature for all the world to see.
But what happened? First it was Russia, the double-eagle and the line of the tzars, cruelly cut off and replaced with the blood red flag of the hammer and sickle. Then it was Nazi Germany’s turn. The iron eagle torn down and the country dismembered, half of it given over to communism, all of it bombed to oblivion. Now the last eagle in the world, America teetering on the brink, with a black president intent on overwhelming us with browns. One single fire has kept all whites on earth together, basking in the same light, enjoying the same fruit, everyone contributing to the pyre and everyone also benefiting from it. It has, unbroken, gone from the utmost mists of the past, the very beginning of literacy, the Iliad, to this very day. Incredible greatness has flourished along the entire line, and THIS, THIS is what will die in 2042. Whites will still be wandering around the globe, wandering around the country, wandering around their neighborhoods. But they will be cut off. Cut off from their destiny. Cut off from their future. A branch withering on the vine. Cut off. Cast away into the fire. To die the second death! Because we will have died that day, never mind the rest. Never mind all the hundreds of millions of whites who will still be wandering the globe. The last eagle will have fallen, the last wings plucked, and forever after no white alive will know a damn thing about the fire that burned in the hearts of all their ancestors for the last three thousand years. They’ll know nothing about it. They’ll care nothing for it. It will be dead to them. They will be dead to it. The special, unique quality that made whites split the atom, land on the moon, describe the orbits of the planets, discover the double helix of DNA, discover the germ theory of disease, discover the principles of human rights and liberty — it can’t live on in a white race of slaves. It can’t express itself as a tiny, taxed, abused, janissaried minority. It didn’t live anywhere in the Ottoman Empire. It didn’t live anywhere whites were slaves or conquered people under the Barbary Pirates. It didn’t live in any of the Communist-controlled countries of Russia and Eastern Europe. It died. Whites may continue to live, but they will no longer be white. White qua White, the beauty and ideal that inspires our greatness, is much, much more vulnerable.
Judgment Day is coming, it will be within our lifetime. But this is all just one potential timeline. This is why life right now is so fascinating. Within my lifetime humanity will either transcend into demigods or descend back into apes. At the very least, the corner will have been turned and it will be obvious for everyone to see where we are headed. But it has not been decided yet.
Currently the world is vastly overpopulated. In just ten years, the stock of food the world has in excess to its needs has halfed. From 120 days of food stored up in excess, to just 60 days of food. We are getting closer to humanity living hand to mouth, on the constant brink of starvation. Why is this happening? It’s simple. Farmers are not practicing sustainable agriculture. It takes hundreds of years for the earth to produce a single inch of topsoil. And yet we consume it in a matter of years. We are draining aquifers. It took hundreds of years for those pools to collect their water, but we are drilling it up in a matter of years. And we are, if global warming is to be believed, heating the world to a point where crops will cease growing due to the oppressive heat. Studies have shown that even a single degree fahrenheit rise in temperature would mean a 10% lower crop yield. All of this so we can fight a losing battle against time. Even with all these reckless measures, our supply of surplus food has halfed in just ten years. And why? Because while we did all this, the fucking africans were tripling their population. The fucking muslims in gaza were having six kids a piece. The fucking afghans were having seven kids each. The fucking Indians, the fucking Pakis, the fucking endless fuckers kept fucking and fucking and fucking and then they turned around and started draining and draining and draining our world’s finite resources. These worthless fucks who all live on a dollar a day or something, who spend their whole lives naked, abused, hungry, illiterate, unthinking baboons, THESE are the people claiming the very last of the world’s water, the last of the world’s topsoil, the last of the world’s fossil fuels. And WE are the hapless do-gooders handing it all over to them, without a care in the world, not in the least worried that time is running out. If we do nothing, the world will give out, the population will half in a horrible war/famine/plague, and everyone left will be the bug-eaten vacant eyed beasts like you see in all the Ethiopia commercials. This is future A, baboon world. The status quo cannot be kept. The present is inherently unstable. Future A cannot just be more of the same, it cannot be some annoying, but tolerable compromise. It cannot be some aggravating, but get-buyable economy. It is either complete victory or total defeat. This is what moderates need to realize. There is no middle ground. Either we stop the third world from swarming over the earth and eating every last shred of bark and blade of grass, or they bring on a civilizational collapse like nothing the world has ever seen.
In this same century though, trends are ALSO continuing towards Future B. The future in all our science fiction novels. People flying between worlds. Sentient computers living side by side with man. Mutants with genetic powers of super strength, telepathy, etc. Nanites that can repair living tissue and make us immortal and indestructible. The technology keeps progressing. We have decoded the human genome and know precisely what genes are uniquely human as compared to say, chimpanzees. We have computers playing better chess than we can, driving cars on their own through traffic and obstacles without crashing. We have stem cells capable of regrowing limbs and organs from scratch and restoring people from paralysis and alzheimer’s, or sight to the blind. These technologies are already here. And the rest is all coming, and ALSO within this century. If any enlightened white country wished to do so, it could embrace the secrets of cloning, stem cells, computers, eugenics, genetic engineering, artificial tissues, computer implants, fusion power, space travel — the secrets of the future just waiting to be revealed by anyone with the guts to try them. And these people, whoever they were, would ascend instead of descend. Then they could save the world, conquer it, destroy it, whatever they wanted. They would be the ultimate power in the universe, able to judge like gods all the rest of mankind that has so horribly gone astray. And it would still be the End of Humanity (or rather, Baboonanity). Only, it would not be the end of white qua white. It would not be the end of the sacred flame. Instead of hundreds of millions of white baboons wandering around the planet with no hope and no future, acting just like their baboon neighbors and scratching out a meagre existence that looks like the stone age, we would have high elves with the most beautiful bodies imaginable, eager minds, wise outlooks, loving hearts, and honor-bound souls. And they would still hold the classics dear. They would still be reading the Iliad. They would still be reading Henry V and ‘Once more into the breach, dear friends!’ They would still be listening to Beethoven’s 9th symphony, composed without ever once getting to enjoy his own music, composed solely for our sake and for God’s, who so achingly said on his deathbed, “in heaven I will hear.” And they would still read the opening line of the Crisis: “these are the times that try men’s souls,” and know that their ancestors had been tried and found—triumphant.
The Greatest Vision
The Greatest Vision
April 21st, 2009I’ve referred to this before, and explained a few times the alternate moral system/governmental model that needs to replace democracy for humanity to move forward. Bantu asked me about this in ‘the end times are coming’ so I thought I’d reply here. But the topic is too big and too complex to cover in a few sentences or an essay. Instead, I just have to refer you, if you’re interested, to the book I wrote that expresses it all quite beautifully. It’s a science fiction novel, that tackles the politics and philosophy and technology needed to enter a ‘new age’ of mankind. Written like this it’s more compelling and more interesting than any non-fiction, non-story essay could make it.
Anyway, no pressure. If you’re interested in the issue, pick it up, otherwise don’t. I’m just providing the opportunity for those who are (like Bantu in his latest comment suggested he was.)
Here’s how to download a copy: Go to https://www.getdropbox.com/ Then in the upper right corner where it says: ‘login’ type in ‘trodjinn@gmail.com’ for email and ‘olives’ for password. Then just scroll down until you see ‘The Greatest Vision’, double click it, choose to download it, and off you go. It’s not too long, and it’s enjoyable every step of the way.
War and Peace
War and Peace:
April 25th, 2009Strangely enough, people in the past did not distinguish themselves based on race. In fact, whites are so innately and naively liberal, that Christopher Columbus left men on an island, after a shipwreck meant they couldn’t all return on the remaining ships, surrounded by Indians and promised to ‘come back later’ to fetch them. Of course, the moment Columbus left back for Spain, the poor sailors were slaughtered and eaten.
This didn’t stop whites from repeating their mistakes. Soon after Jamestown was founded the first thing the settlers did was invite Indians to become Christians and work right alongside the whites inside the town. When one day the Indians all rose up in the night and slaughtered every man, woman, and child they could get their hands on, killing a third of the entire colony, whites managed to rouse themselves to a fierce self-defense and kicked them out. Only thirty years later, however, they had invited the Indians BACK INTO TOWN to live and work alongside them again. It took ANOTHER slaughter of hundreds of colonists before it occurred to them that this wasn’t working and the Indians were permanently regarded as enemies. Jamestown, strangely enough, was founded in a salty, boggy malarial hellhole because the settlers felt it offered good defenses against Spanish and French ships. They built a fort to defend against potential European adversaries while dying of malaria and drinking saltwater, all the while inviting every last naked cannibal savage they could find to become their good christian neighbors. What kind of inane behavior is this?
This is hardly new. When the French-Indian War (or 7 years war) broke out, France actually paid Indians for every scalp of a white British. Man, woman, or child, they simply wanted all Americans and Englishmen massacred for the sake of expanding their own empire. French, working alongside Indians, once oversaw the orderly surrender of a British garrison during the war, only to watch complacently as the Indian savages broke the deal and slaughtered all the British after they had laid down their arms. French apparently had no problems with their Indian neighbors but hated British with all their hearts. Both France and Britain employed black africans and brown muslims in their armies to attack Italy and Germany during World War II. As a result, civilians were routinely robbed, raped, and killed by these out-of-control savages while the white French and British looked the other way. It can also be pointed out that Germany during its campaign eastward enslaved and brutalized if not simply wiped out millions of Poles, Russians, Ukrainians, and other whites in their occupied territory, for the sake of their particular German ethnicity’s ‘lebensraum.’
Racism is in fact a new idea, never before seen in the world. Before now, Europe didn’t refer to itself as ‘land of the whites,’ it called itself ‘Christendom.’ When they fought africans and asians, it was not because they were non-whites seeking to conquer and ravage our homelands, it was because the ‘heathens’ and the ‘mussulmans’ were trying to destroy the land of Christ. When latin Crusaders answered the cry for aid from Byzantium, it was not because they were fellow whites, but because they were fellow Christians fighting against Islam. Indeed, eventually the latin Crusaders turned on Byzantium and attacked them for being Orthodox instead of Roman Catholic. To whites of the past, this was just as bad as being a muslim. The race of the heretic or non-believer did not even enter into the equation. The Albigensian heresy in southern france was exterminated with the flippant phrase “Kill them all and let God sort them out.” No such merciless or pitiless attitude was ever extended to non-whites anywhere in the colonized world!!! Protestant Germany lost 1/3 of its population in the 30 Years War because Catholics did not consider themselves to have anything in common with heretics, and did not show any mercy or empathy for what were essentially their brothers.
Before Constantinople fell, a Crusade was offered the Emperor if he would simply convert to Catholicism to relieve the turkish siege. The Emperor agreed but his people refused, feeling it was better to be conquered by Turks and continue practicing their religion than being conquered by Rome and the hated catholics, losing their freedom entirely. On such a ridiculous schism much of Europe was lost for centuries to non-white rule. If racism had existed in the past, nothing like this would have ever occurred. The vikings certainly had no interest in their race, preying almost exclusively on other white nations in centuries of bloody raids. Meanwhile Poland and Russia, though often fighting for their lives against Turks and Mongols, still found time to engage in endless border wars and bloodshed. Just like Germany and Italy, just like France and England, just like Spain and Holland, just like Russia and Sweden. . .etc, etc, etc. If there had been any racial consciousness in these people, the idea of spilling blood and treasure in order to take from their own brothers, different perhaps in language, dress, and religion but the same in personality, behavior, appearance, intelligence, and accomplishment, the whole thing becomes crazy. Even supposing it’s worth fighting ‘100 years wars’ in order to eradicate millions of fellow whites to give your ethnicity a slight advantage over the neighboring ethnicity — how can this possibly make sense unless you are even more hostile, even more destructive, even more hateful towards less related groups? Instead we see Britain rushing to the aid of the Turks in the Crimean War to go kill their fellow Russians. We see French allying with Indians to kill British. We see whites taking the side of non-whites just to get at their hated ethnic foe.
While French and British intellectuals were often rooming together like Rousseau and Hume, while Paris and London continuously talked together about their new scientific and political theorems, their motherlands were still warring with each other and killing each other all over the world. While Russians were literally speaking french among all the nobility due to its perceived high culture and artistic worth, Napoleon was invading and attempting to destroy Russia, and instead was in turn destroyed. While German and Austrian composers were charming all of Europe with their masterpieces, Germany and Austria were fighting wars with each other over border disputes. Even though it was obvious to everyone at this point that all of Europe was a divine cradle for a divine race, that exceeded all the rest of mankind one hundred fold in all aspects, the act of fratricide went on merrily throughout World War I and World War II on the most massive scale ever seen. What devil possessed the whites in those trenches, who commonly played soccer together and sang christmas carols together in no man’s land, to go back the next day to machine gunning and artillery shelling and gassing each other to death in the millions? Why did the North and the South have generals who were best friends and comrades in the Mexican-American war, with soldiers who were literally brothers serving on opposite sides, who traded tobacco during truces, mowing each other down like so much wheat to the point that more whites were killed in the Civil War than black slaves were even freed??? Is this sensible? Every war ever waged between whites was immoral and evil. Whoever was the aggressor in such a war was evil, regardless of whatever motive he held. Regardless of whether he was serving his faith, his ethnicity, his ideals, or whatever other bullshit motive he held in the slaughter of his fellow whites. Whether they were vikings raping and pillaging, Romans slaughtering, enslaving, and conquering Gauls and Germans, French, British, Germans, Hapsburgs, or Americans.
Switzerland is composed of three ethnic groups: French, Germans, and Italians. It speaks three different languages. It is even divided religiously, some parts are protestant, others are catholic. Nevertheless, Switzerland has been a stable, peaceful democracy for 500 years. It is the oldest democracy and the most peaceful country on Earth. The Swiss are what all Europe could have been. A white nation. They didn’t care about their religion, their language, their ethnicity, or any fanciful ideals. All that was necessary was for their people to share the same race. They decided that together they were stronger than they would be apart, that everyone in the Swiss federation was valuable and had something to contribute, and then acted as a union for the betterment of all. Their economy is still absolutely top of the line, their self-defense nearly impregnable, and their hands blessedly are completely clean of all the murder of all the wars that mark the rest of our pasts. If they can do it, any of us can. If their differences don’t produce a civil war or foreign war for 500 years, NOBODY has an excuse for what they did.
It is not true that racism causes wars. Racism, in fact, would stop wars. If the European Union took on healthy views instead of its currently liberal ones, it would be the perfect end to intra-white wars. I love seeing so many white nations cooperating and trading amongst each other that previously were dead set on slaughtering each other’s women and children. Who could have ever imagined the same political Union including Italy, Germany, Poland, the U.K., Ireland, and France? How many millions of people have died by each of these nations towards each other? How much hate and revenge is being quietly washed away by the unity of the white race in Europe? The same occurred in America. When the various ethnicities arrived in the US, they carried their emotional baggage with them. Irish, Italians, Poles, English, Germans, and French have all grown to love and accept each other in peace and prosperity. We don’t even notice our differences anymore, if there are any. Race was unity enough, everything else was just a chimera. The illusion of difference without any reality to it. Once America gave living together a chance, it succeeded, just like Switzerland did, just like the European Union could. Compared to the remaining wars racism could spark: wars with our trading partners and intellectual equals the East Asians(why on earth would anyone want to do that??), wars with Islam, wars with black Africa, and wars with the Amerindians, racism has drastically cut down the threat of war on earth. If we actually loved our race, so many hatchets would be buried, so many blunders ended, so many opportunities for meaningless differences would be quashed and put down. And let’s be clear, a racist war on black africa, muslims, or amerindians is all merited in the name of self-defense at this time, due to the mass migration, mass breeding, drug running, welfare leeching, mass crime and terrorism they have committed against us. So racism threatens to bring about war on the very enemies who most threaten us, while assuring an end to wars that were the very worst and most disastrous and pointless in our history. ((the potential thermo-nuclear Soviet-US war, World War I, the Napoleonic Wars, World War II, the War Between the States, the 30 years War, the 100 years War, the 4th Crusade, etc, etc.)) No happier result could be concocted than such a political frame of mind.
It is time to bury all ethnic hatreds. Whites are one race, every nation has some claim to fame. All of us are beautiful, brilliant, and prosperous. We turn every continent we touch into a prosperous, free, secure, and humane nation any of us could wish to live in. Russians are good people. Australians are good people. Canadians are good people. South Africans are good people. Argentinians are good people. Americans are good people. The Confederacy was full of good people. The Union was full of good people. The axis powers were full of good people. The Allies were full of good people. Germans are good people. British are good people. Spanish are good people. Whites are good people, there is no one like us, there never has been, and there never will be. Ethnicity, language, religion, and all this tripe simply causes needless wars and conflicts over nothing. Race, whenever it is rallied to, alternatively causes peace, prosperity, cooperation and freedom wherever it takes hold. This doesn’t mean all whites should become one nation. It is better if we all are free to develop ourselves in our own way. I’m happy for little Slovenia and Lithuania and Andorra to be doing their own thing.
But it does mean whites must be supra-national when it comes to certain things: We must never go to war with each other again. We must share our art and science freely and fund major projects together that might change the world. We should trade freely with each other, and greet each other’s tourists, athletes, performers and internet visitors with love and good cheer. Whites for the first time must view each other as white first, everything else second. And though race traitors are currently our bane and nemesis, underneath their ignorance and delusions they are still just like us. If we ever do become the majority or gain power, it will be due to ‘race traitors’ who see the light and change their views and join our side. Almost all of us were once one of them! The moment we do gain power over them, mercy should be our first priority, not justice; and educating their children and ours in right and wrong will be the long-term cure.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)