It should be clear to anyone that most of what they were ever taught in school, at church, and in the media was all lies. Unfortunately, people do not learn from discovering one lie, the meta-realization that there must be other lies they have been taught that they have yet to uncover. They do not use their critical thinking skills on all their beliefs, but selectively challenge one or another belief they find incredible, leaving the rest of the edifice, and thus the structural integrity of the building, intact. This permits the most ludicrous juxtapositions of thought, for instance creationists who believe in racial differences. Or evolutionists who believe in egalitarianism. At a certain point in someone's life, they must leave everything they were ever taught behind them. They must review everything they know, look at all sides of every issue, and determine objectively where the truth really lies. People who have discovered one or two deceits of the modern world and pride themselves on their enlightenment, are woefully ignorant puppets still dancing to the strings of their rulers. Like the 13 circles of hell, climbing out of a single one may make your life somewhat more tolerable than before, but it hardly means you are in Purgatory, much less Heaven. Dante did not end his journey at the first circle or the first heavenly sphere, sit down, and decide he'd seen enough. He sojourned across the entirety of the inferno and paradise, with his trusty guides Virgil and Beatrice constantly encouraging him to move forwards and not lose heart or grow complacent with the sphere he was in.
The lies that rule the world can probably be graded in this order of strength. Each and every one of them is capable of destroying the world, independent of the rest. Together, they become an unstoppable juggernaut that enslaves everyone in its path. If no man stands up for the Truth, if no movement dedicates itself not to one lie or another, but to the pursuit of truth and a willingness to follow it wherever it might lead, we are literally facing the end of the world. I wish I knew what lay in the hearts of East Asians. Do they really buy into any of these lies? Do they mouth it simply because they'd rather get along than dispute the issues? Do they let sleeping dogs lie because, after all, it doesn't hurt them but only their competitors around the world? If I could ever have a frank discussion with Japanese, Chinese, South Koreans, and the intelligent cadres of India, it would be fascinating to see how free or ensnared they are to these world-devouring lies. It is my pessimistic opinion, however, that they are as fooled and deluded as the rest of us, and mere chance has spared them up until this point. Sooner or later, the same lies will take root in their lands, and corrupt their societies into oblivion as well. Relying on the East to succeed where we have failed is fanciful, it isn't a solution, it is simply a surrender. These lies must be struck down, and it must be us, the same people who invented the Scientific Method, produced the Renaissance and discovered the Enlightenment who strikes them. We are the best, if we fail, there is no evidence anyone else could succeed. This is the battleground for the soul of the world. The day has come, we cannot afford to retreat any further.
#1. 'The Abrahamic faiths. Anyone who believes in Judaism or its spinoffs -- Christianity, Islam, Mormonism, Bha'i, Sikhs, etc, etc.'
This is a big lie. It's obvious that God, if he exists in any sense of the word, would not have the particular personality and characteristics and goals as the ones described in these holy books. That God would not speak in such an ignorant manner, neglecting science and logic as though He were just as dumb as the followers of his day. That God would not lie, or say contradictory or paradoxical things, demand or condone evil, design the world to act/be opposite to his own wishes, and so on. These ridiculous personal Gods that reflect the personality of their makers but not of the Maker, are mere stories that lead us away from the truth in front of our eyes. By demanding we suspend our reason, God steals our humanity from us and leaves us as ignoble sheep, readily led by the most vicious and worthless wolves amongst us. The great harm religion has done us and still does to us cannot be easily contained: The Old Testament begins with the glorification of genocide, the slaughter of all the innocent firstborn of Egypt and all the Palestinians who were in Jews' way. It supports polygamy, slavery, deceit, child sacrifice, and proposes the most ludicrous miracles that create an anti-scientific bent of mind fixated on illusions instead of observable reality. Sometimes the sun sits still in the sky for hours, other times the whole world is flooded and only 2 of every species survives, all of which fit in a boat. Christianity does little better by first sanctioning and thus repeating everything wrong in the Old Testament, then creating a Heaven and Hell where justice is done and Faith is rewarded, thus relegating people's actual lives to a mere footnote of their existence. By devaluing their earthly existence, Christians are led into ridiculously irrational choices like chastity, pacifism, charity to their own enemies, the 'brotherhood of man in Christ' and whatever else is said to get them out of Hell and into Heaven.
Following them up comes Islam, which calls for the slaughter or enslavement of anyone who does not obey the one true God of Abraham. Clearly learning from both previous religions, the warlike master race messiahdom of the jews and the heaven and hell martyrdom system of Christianity creates a new hybrid monster: jihad. Ever since its beginning in 600 AD, it has been aggressively attacking all of its neighbors, destroying their temples, banning all intellectual investigations, slaughtering hundreds of millions, enslaving and castrating tens of millions more, and all in the name of God with a holy book to back them up. This ruthless tribe numbers over a billion and even wields nuclear weapons. So long as the delusion continues, it represents a mortal threat to all the rest of mankind. Those trapped within it are no better off. They are poor, illiterate, polygamous, (and thus without loving families) their women are mutilated or beaten, life is stagnant and oppressively repetitive, and everything good in life is denied to them. Music, wine, dance, poetry, art, sex, you name it -- and as a counter to this, a ruthlessly violent and unscrupulous world of rape, child molestation, prostitution, crime, debauchery, drugs and corruption behind closed doors. Whichever path the particular muslim takes, Islam has trapped his soul in perdition. All religions tend to deny evolution and thus the seminal insight that controls both morality and power in the real world. Without evolution, we can never understand ourselves, or our needs, and we will always be victims to those who do, either consciously or unconsciously, pursue the survival of the fittest.
Since fully 1/2 of the world and nearly the entirety of the western world holds one of these religious beliefs, even if they are slightly harmful their wronghood is multiplied by their popularity, creating a mountain of harm from even a slightly perverse beginning. It is frightening even in abstract that 1/3 of all humans on earth have endorsed the same values system, or more broadly speaking even 1/2. A healthy system requires diversity, the ability to change, progress, and adapt to the world around us. By becoming such a sickly, unadaptive, and inflexible single branch of human thought, we become vulnerable to pandemics of stupidity and ignorance, while losing all chance of strokes of genius and refinement.
#2: 'Nurture, not Nature, determines everything.'
This is the second most pervasive and dangerous lie on earth. The idea that genes basically create an empty vessel and then people pour in whatever they want flies in the face of everything we know about the animal kingdom and our own historical human nature, as well of course as all the twin studies and recent science of the modern era. This illusion, which makes all genes meaningless and thus all human variation a mere sidenote, has dangerously leveled a playing field between the superiors and inferiors of the earth. Hundreds of thousands of years of evolution, perhaps with refinements that can never be repeated again, could be lost chasing this lie. If genes are not regarded as meaningful, no preference will be paid to those of superior qualities, and eventually they will go extinct, simply diluted to non-existence by the massive upsurge of un-evolved mankind. Furthermore, this foolishness causes intractable friction with whites, for instance, trying to educate blacks in fields they'll never understand. Or attempt to fight black criminality in the same lenient way they would whites. Or create social safety nets for blacks as though they would be just as responsible with them as whites. Trillions of dollars and millions of lives are lost attempting the impossible with uplift programs like 'The Great Society' and 'The War on Poverty.' Democracy is assumed to be sensible because everyone is equally qualified to run a country, disparities in income are seen to be unjust because everyone is equally qualified at producing wealth, and so on. Every stupid idea on earth has some connection to the fraudulent faith in nurture as the source of human (e)quality.
It also causes genocidal rampages like those of the communists who attempted to remake mankind by silencing all critics and liquidating all potential opponents of their new world. Needless to say, it isn't so easy to remake mankind's genes as it is to control what is said in public, and so communism achieved nothing after all its tyranny but pain. People were still exactly the same underneath, and always would be, regardless of what they were taught in school. "To make an omelet, you must crack a few eggs," was the soviet justification for its gulags and genocidal purges, but that logic falls apart when you realize no 'omelet' of 'homo sovieticus' can be created because human nature is independent of any tyrant's cultural sway. A simple acknowledgment that force cannot make people better off, life fairer, people more loving, etc, would be a great step for freedom and security in the world. There are no shortcuts to utopia. Only a steady devotion to Truth and the steady application of science can get us there, and that requires a secure environment, a capitalist economy, the rule of law, freedom of speech, and many other freedoms we most hold dear.
#3 'Women and Men are interchangeable. They can do whatever they like, there is nothing particularly suited to either sex, and there is no best fit or relationship between the sexes. Two men, one man and ten women, a man and a goat, a man and a child or a single woman are just as good as a man and a woman. Nature provides no manual or plan for our relationships.'
Though we can say Islam is the most grievous flaw of asia and the power of nurture the most grievous flaw of multi-racial societies, this myth has specialized in the destruction of otherwise completely healthy lands. Places with 95% whites, largely atheist, who know better than to adopt communism, have still fallen for this lie and thus, the rot of inevitable death. Places like Scandinavia, Italy, and Germany that should have no problems anywhere on their radar are instead wilting just as or even faster than the USA. Without clear sex roles mandating the performance of people's evolved and necessary functions, society is thrown into confusion and enters a death spiral of unbelievably low birth rates. Only one half as many children exist as parents. A single generation of this madness is thus worse than the Black Plague, the worst disaster to ever befall Europe. A couple further generations and it is as though a meteor were to have slammed down on the continent akin to the end of the dinosaurs. If a death sentence were not enough proof of the wrong-headedness of this lie, the pain of contemporary society is an equally forceful argument. Never before have so many people been so lonely for so long. Divorce has skyrocketed to 50%+ of all marriages, the majority of children are illegitimate and without both parents to love and nurture them, there are no sisters or brothers for playmates, no cousins or uncles for companions, no economic safety net for those who fall on hard times by moving in with the parents, no rich inheritances following from a distant relative. The family is non-existent. To make things worse, no solace can be found in the love of one's husband or wife. Your marriage will more than likely include adultery, more than likely it will simply end in divorce. Inbetween, more than likely it will be full of fights, conflict, and irreconcilable differences. The dating world is hedonistic but heartbreaking, as lie after lie and disappointment after disappointment flit through decade after decade of singlehood.
The age of set gender roles created an entirely different world. One where love and duty went hand in hand, children had parents, siblings, and cousins every day of their life to live with, marriage was quick and divorce unthinkable. Men were heads of the household and providers for the home, women were the child-bearers, child-rearers, chore-doers, peace-makers, social event organizers and comforters. Virgins were prized and women were protected from both force and fraud. Marriage was encouraged and debauchery was forbidden. It was simply a different world. It is hard to imagine it existed just 60 years ago. I shudder to imagine what 60 more years of this lie will create.
#4. 'Evil does not exist. There are no malignant tendencies on this world, no threats, no cause for concern. There is nothing to fear and no one to mistrust.'
This lie is truly atrocious and again, incredibly widespread. The number of people who 'see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil' are legion, and they are the AIDS of any healthy mind's immune system. If we can not resist the evil in our midst, because people are sure that it doesn't even exist, the illness simply spreads and spreads. You would think that ruined cities like Detroit that look like bombed out wastelands would clue someone in that something evil, some dire threat, is in their midst. But you would be wrong! Due to this lie, that we should tolerate anyone and everything, that there is nothing to fear and 'this is the best of all possible worlds,' that any concerns are 'a conspiracy theory' and any naming of malignant parties is 'hate,' we are managing to literally go extinct without ever once even admitting there is a problem. As C.S. Lewis said, the greatest trick the Devil ever managed was convincing people he did not exist. The greatest trick jews ever pulled was convincing people they did not exist. "We aren't in power. We don't control the media. We don't donate the majority of all campaign funds to both the Republican and Democratic party. We don't use advertising as a weapon to keep companies toeing the politically correct line. We don't lie about and constantly harp on the Holocaust to gain sympathy. What are you talking about? All we ever do is work hard and hug kittens." Let us admit that things are not ideal, that a great deal of ruin confronts us in all directions: economic ruin, environmental ruin, moral ruin, familial ruin, racial ruin, cultural ruin, and that no such collapse could come about if every single person were a good healthy vibrant producer!!!! Someone has to be causing this damage, someone has to be a net negative, for a negative world to exist. If these people are not named and confronted, then where will it ever end?
Now imagine a Christian who believes we are all born equal blank slates who feels families come in 'all sizes, shapes and colors' and that no one anywhere on earth wishes her harm or would like to control her, intent on loving her neighbor as herself and then peacefully going to heaven, and you have the Juggernaut combined. Can you imagine this sort of mentality multiplied by a billion and then left to fend for itself in the world today? She and everyone with her would be destroyed, within mere decades, the whole thing would fall apart. The women will be dragged away for endless gang rapes and the men will be put to work in virtual slave-galleys of 99% taxes, the children, of course, simply would never be born.
If you have ever seen transformers or voltron or even power rangers, you know that each of these lies is piloted by its own person and fights well on its own, but combined it becomes an unstoppable cooperative giant robot of doom. Many have opposed it, but none have succeeded. The blazing sword cuts through all Voltron's foes equally. Those who would combat one lie but not the others are simply leaving a blind spot, an opening for Voltron to strike through. All lies work together, because they are all emanations from the same Father of Lies. If truth occasionally aids lies, occasionally opposes it. If truth occasionally fights other champions of truth, and occasionally liars. If truth stabs itself in the back while vigorously defending itself from the frontal assault of the green lion or the yellow lion of lies, how far do you expect it to go? A voltron of truth is the only opponent of a voltron of lies. Captain Planet is the only equal to Captain Pollution. Truth is only as powerful as its weakest link. The first lie that invades it cripples it against all the rest. As an alternative to Captain Pollution, we must form Captain Planet. Those who seek to redress any of the Big Lies, must stand for all the Big Truths. How obvious is this? Why must it even be mentioned?
Here is the Truth: #1: God is inscrutable, if he even exists, and all the religions of the earth are delusions fashioned by men for their own petty goals. If we must worship a God, let it be a God of Love, Beauty, and Truth, and reject any religious belief that interferes with goods so sacred and divine.
#2: Genes overwhelmingly make the man, nurture can spoil one's potential but can never raise it. The best thing we can do for everyone is accept them for who they are, and not try and change them into anything else, but instead to treat them accordingly. The best way to improve our collective lives is to restrict and encourage childbirth to happy, well qualified homes.
#3: Humans are meant to live in a network of monogamy. That is, the ideal and necessary life for human well being includes a man and a woman, strictly sexually faithful to each other for life, having at the very least a son and a daughter, starting at an early age when they are still healthy and pure, and that these children are loved and supported by both the mother and father every day of their lives. These children should then be given both the opportunity and encouragement to find wives and husbands of their own, at a time when they are still healthy and pure, and the cycle should continue with the same rhythm and inner beauty as the birdsongs of spring. The family should be aware of and interact with the extended family, the extended family should be aware of and interact with the village, and the village should be aware of and interact with the nation. Hospitality and love should flow freely between every member of the group. Loneliness should not arise in a properly connected world.
#4: Life is struggle, and murder is the daily routine of every bacteria, plant, animal and man simply to survive another day. We must never imagine that disaster cannot befall us, that parasitism has vanished, that predators have moved away, and that the 'lion has lain down with the lamb.' There is evil in every heart, dark passions in every man and woman, and there is danger in the air we breathe, the water we drink, the light of the sun, every chemical, every fad, every idea and every choice. Nothing is ever easy, nothing is free. The answer is to know our enemy, know ourself, and be the victor of a thousand battles. It is not to run, hide, or put our heads in the sand. We must endure and overcome, such is the path of heroes, and heroism is the path to eternity.
Together, we can form a Captain Planet, A voltron with a blazing sword. Independently, no single truth can save us and no truth will get us anywhere. It will be a self-defeating, abortive attempt like so many others that have obviously failed all around us. The 'christian conservatives' have lost headway every year for a century. The 'libertarians' have lost to socialism and tyranny every year for a century. The do-gooders have failed to achieve any of their goals, whether it be world peace, an end to world hunger, women's lib or worldwide democracy. The environmentalists have tried in vain to save endangered species, prevent global warming, prevent population growth or create sustainable energy. The anti-racists have never managed to stamp out hate and distrust between the races, even when they live cheek by jowl in integrated schools and workplaces. The communists simply cannot stop the inequality of incomes within countries and between them. There has been a worldwide failure of every goal on earth, and meanwhile we all together ride towards the cliff of irretrievable breakdown. It's time for something new. Something more inclusive, a larger paradigm that includes more than one idea. Something as complex as humanity itself. Something not reduced to a singular, bullheaded and obdurate point. A synthesis of Truth that confronts all lies everywhere. An alloy of Good that confronts evil on even terms. The forces of darkness are powerful, they are united, and they intend to devour us all. How long will petty enmities and meaningless rivalries keep the forces of light fractured and impotent? We must stand for all Truths everywhere, or each truth will surely hang separately.
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
Sunday, April 26, 2009
The Sword of Truth, The Haze of Lies
"There is not a truth existing which I fear or would wish unknown to the whole world."
--Thomas Jefferson.
"Live not by lies."
--Aleksander Solzhenitsyn.
The Devil is the "Father of Lies." This should clue anyone in, that lying is evil. That living a lie is base, corrupt, and wrong. That enduring lies and not challenging them is moral cowardice. That anyone serving or propagating a lie is a disciple of Satan and man's mortal enemy. I wrote post after post saying lying is not acceptable, not for any reason. Here is a quote:
"If you adopt only those truths which suit you, while denying those truths which you find distasteful, like some sort of chinese menu, you are a coward, a hypocrite, and a cur."
"People who wrap themselves in their pet causes and start clamoring on about how offended they are, how insufferable those who question their delusions are, how everyone on earth has to cater to them and never speak ill of anything they want, are no better than blacks insisting they’re equal and they built the pyramids or invented the refrigerator."
"So no, we can not accept ’some’ lies for the sake of civility, or machiavellan policy, or any other excuse. Life without truth is worthless. Never ask that of anyone."
The Holocaust is a lie. I can back this up with endless evidence, the most basic of which is there are no mass graves where the jews were supposedly killed. We are still finding mass graves of Soviet slaughters of Croatians, we find mass graves of Serbians, we find mass graves of Iraqis, we find every mass grave that's ever been, even when they are random places with no marker. In Poland, however, we are told exactly where the mass graves are, we are standing on top of the concentration camps, and yet we can't find any mass graves. The only explanation for this is there were none in the first place. The alternate explanation, that the Nazis had magic evidence-b-gone chalk that whisked jewish bodies away into a spirit realm without disturbing any soil layers and without leaving any teeth or bones behind, is ludicrous and an obvious lie. If anyone took ten seconds to clear their heads of all the brainwashing they've been suffering at the hands of jewish media, they would be able to make just a quick assessment and conclusion that the whole thing is a farce. But it requires the mind of Descartes, who banished everything he believed and started over with a blank slate willing to accept anything logic would arrive at, to actually get to the truth in situations like these.
For those willing to give a fresh look at the Holocaust and a complete review of all the evidence of its falsehood and lack of evidence for its claims, I have uploaded Dissecting the Holocaust to my dropbox. To download it, just go to dropbox.com, type in the email of trodjinn@gmail.com, and the password olives. Download the .pdf file 'Dissecting the Holocaust' and away you go. Trust me, anyone who actually reads that book will be convinced and will change their mind from any previous stance. There is no way, after reading the book in its entirety, for anyone to believe the traditional holocaust narrative afterwards. I took the Holocaust for granted until I read it, and by the end I was absolutely converted. All it took was an open mind. I have an open mind that obeys the Truth, not delusions that are convenient for me, and so the process was quite rapid. For others, they will refuse to ever look into the issue. They are simply cowards or sheep without the intellect to come to their own conclusions. There's a third group that is even more weaselly however. There are people who know full well the holocaust is a fraud, but go on pretending it's true. They enforce the holocaust meme on others and ostracize/condemn those who tell the truth, even though they know it's true. They abandon those who are jailed for holocaust denial and don't speak up for them, even though they know they are innocent of all wrongdoing and simply standing up for truth and justice. This is Uhuru Guru. They do this with various excuses. For the sake of 'respectability.' Or because they don't want to lose their loved ones good opinion. Or because they are afraid to say it due to the authorities. Or because they have a 'master plan' where they will slowly convert people with the easier truths first, and the hardest ones last. Whatever, there's a million reasons to lie, but every single one of them serves the Father of Lies. There is only one reason to tell the truth, and that reason trumps all of them. Truth is an absolute. Truth does not compromise. Truth is not interested in summer soldiers. Either you are a man of integrity and conviction, or a weasel who will say anything at anytime that gains you any advantage. Life without truth is not worth living, this is both philosophically clear and empirically proven. Those who have had to mouth lies all their lives are broken, miserable men on the way to extinction. Not only does it corrupt people's souls and weaken their life-force, but it leads to ludicrous conclusions that no one can counteract that lead to immediate practical harm. For instance, the communists of China felt crops should be planted close together because communism was all about supporting each other and huddling together, and this was just as true of the plant world as the human world. Needless to say, the crops viciously competed with all their nearby 'huddlers' for the nutrients and water, most of them died, and famine broke out killing tens of millions. This obvious lie was known to all the farmers, they had planted the crops distant from each other for thousands of years for a reason, because they knew it worked better that way. But they could not say anything, they could not speak up against the lie for fear of execution, so instead the whole thing was carried out to its inevitable conclusion. A society based on a lie, any lie, will eventually lead to a ludicrous decision like this which will destroy the country. Anyone anywhere who lives a lie is on the path to extinction. The clock is ticking. That is why, from a purely practical point of view, accepting a lie, any lie, anywhere in your society, is a mortal error.
The Holocaust is the only historical event in the world that it is illegal to question. You can have any theory you want over the nuking of Japan, the rape of Nanjing, the firebombing of Dresden, or any older war, but if you question the Holocaust in most of the 1st world, you go to jail. Why? What makes jews so special? What makes their suffering so important that it's blasphemy to challenge it? People can mock and downplay the suffering of Chinese in WWII, who lost 30 million people, not '6 million.' They can mock and downplay the deaths of the Russian people, who lost 20 million people, not '6 million.' But if you mock and downplay the suffering of the jewish people, you are thrown in jail for 'hurting their sensitive feelings' and, basically, blasphemy. The difference is power. Jews currently rule the world, and as a benefit, they get to erect double standards that especially favor them. Holocaust Denial is a crime, no other historical revisionism is. No other country should be homogeneous or control its borders, but Israel has the right to be a homogeneous jewish state with control of their borders. No one else can have anti-miscegenation laws, but in Israel it is illegal for a jew to marry a non-jew. No one else can define their country based on blood kinship, but Israel's definition of jew and law of return is anyone who is descended by blood from a jew, NOT their religious beliefs.
Currently nearly every child in the 1st world is required to learn about the Holocaust in school, there are thousands of holocaust memorial museums, something like 150 movies have been made on the holocaust and multiple new ones come out every year. Not a day goes by without jews reminding us of the Holocaust, how horrible it was, how evil we were for doing it, and how we must do everything in our power to prevent any thinking that might lead to another holocaust someday. All this for the death of '6 million' jews. But what of the 20 million Russians? The 30 million Chinese? The millions of pacific islanders? The millions of Germans? The 10 million Ukrainians and others who died due Stalin's persecutions in the 1930's? Where are their movies? Where are their museums? Where are their classroom lessons? Where are their spokesmen appearing on TV everyday discussing how we can never allow another holodomor? This is a double standard. The jews get to be remembered because they're in power, they control the schools, the media, the movies, and therefore they control what is discussed. They'd prefer to endlessly harp on the suffering of jews and the special victimhood of jews, and thus the sheeple and lemmings accept that and become the willing tools and zombies of this blanket saturation.
How does the Holocaust lie lead to a mortal error in our society? You'd think the exact number of jews who died in a war 60 years ago wouldn't matter one way or another. It should be as meaningless as the number of French who died at Waterloo. But this is how insidious lies are. No matter how trivial it seems, take a lie into your bosom, and the snake will bite, and the venom will spread to every organ, and you Will perish. The Holocaust lie serves two roles, it dampens nationalism everywhere because people fear it might lead to 'another Holocaust.' It associates nationalism with hate and genocide, and thus deters people from accepting it. This restricts people from the best political and philosophical system on earth, leading to the destruction of their civilizations one after another via mass immigration and multiculti cultural relativism. That alone is a mortal error caused by the Holohoax. But it serves another purpose, and that is to make jews an untouchable victim race who can never be criticized no matter what they do. This special force field, the holocaust lie, gives them an immunity to all resistance no matter how evil they are towards others. Have jews just bombed gaza into ruins in retaliation for a rocket that hurt no one? THE HOLOCAUST. Have jews just thrown our economic situation in chaos all over the world due to bad lending and monetary decisions? THE HOLOCAUST. Have jews yet again endlessly lobbied for war with Iraq, Iran, or some other innocent nation causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands? THE HOLOCAUST. Have jews unfairly favored each other in close-knit circles of movie making, book publishing, proffesorships, etc? THE HOLOCAUST. Have jews founded the NAACP, the ADL, the SPLC, the Communist Party, the ANC, and every other subversive organization determined to wipe out whites worldwide? THE HOLOCAUST. And now you see that a random lie about exactly how many jews died in WWII, by being accepted, leads to universal ruin and destruction. There is no such thing as an innocuous, unimportant lie. If the lie is not defeated, it will strangle you to death. If the lie is not pierced, it will crush you. If you do not wield the sword of truth, you will choke to death on the poisonous haze of lies. If you do not follow the straight and narrow path, you will be lost forever in the wilderness. There is no choice in the matter. Either you serve God, who said, quite simply: "I am Truth." Or you serve the Devil, who is, quite simply, The Father of Lies.
When I saw a fellow patriot in need, David Duke, who has done more for whites than any other man on earth, I rushed to his defense and fought the vicious lies being used against him. Uhuru Guru stabbed him in the back, erased the post, and banished me. Between the two, who reacted properly? I have no regrets. If I can't tell the truth, I have no use for such a website. If the website refuses to tell the truth, no reader should have any use in reading it. Compromised as it now is, the entire edifice is just a pile of shit. And as a result, all it can do now is post naked black porn, make stunted, meaninglessly vague statements like 'multiculturalism magically appeared out of nowhere, for no reason, no group is pushing it on us, no people are funding it or propagating it, and there is no reason why it is still believed today.' Gee, what an amazing analysis. Or, we could go where the truth leads us, realize jews, a hyper-smart, hyper-ethnocentric group are determined to create a world that best suits them, but no one else, and then fight them head-on for all we're worth.
This is how Jews view the world:
"Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves."
--Menachim Begin, FORMER PRESIDENT OF ISRAEL!!
Jews have made their agenda clear. We are to be their cattle or simply crushed like insects under their feet. We are to lick their feet for life. Uhuru Guru is apparently fine with this and strives every day not to offend jews and to censor any criticism of jews off his website. I, however, am not fine with this. I see no reason why I should lick jews' feet or be their cattle. The choice is yours.
--Thomas Jefferson.
"Live not by lies."
--Aleksander Solzhenitsyn.
The Devil is the "Father of Lies." This should clue anyone in, that lying is evil. That living a lie is base, corrupt, and wrong. That enduring lies and not challenging them is moral cowardice. That anyone serving or propagating a lie is a disciple of Satan and man's mortal enemy. I wrote post after post saying lying is not acceptable, not for any reason. Here is a quote:
"If you adopt only those truths which suit you, while denying those truths which you find distasteful, like some sort of chinese menu, you are a coward, a hypocrite, and a cur."
"People who wrap themselves in their pet causes and start clamoring on about how offended they are, how insufferable those who question their delusions are, how everyone on earth has to cater to them and never speak ill of anything they want, are no better than blacks insisting they’re equal and they built the pyramids or invented the refrigerator."
"So no, we can not accept ’some’ lies for the sake of civility, or machiavellan policy, or any other excuse. Life without truth is worthless. Never ask that of anyone."
The Holocaust is a lie. I can back this up with endless evidence, the most basic of which is there are no mass graves where the jews were supposedly killed. We are still finding mass graves of Soviet slaughters of Croatians, we find mass graves of Serbians, we find mass graves of Iraqis, we find every mass grave that's ever been, even when they are random places with no marker. In Poland, however, we are told exactly where the mass graves are, we are standing on top of the concentration camps, and yet we can't find any mass graves. The only explanation for this is there were none in the first place. The alternate explanation, that the Nazis had magic evidence-b-gone chalk that whisked jewish bodies away into a spirit realm without disturbing any soil layers and without leaving any teeth or bones behind, is ludicrous and an obvious lie. If anyone took ten seconds to clear their heads of all the brainwashing they've been suffering at the hands of jewish media, they would be able to make just a quick assessment and conclusion that the whole thing is a farce. But it requires the mind of Descartes, who banished everything he believed and started over with a blank slate willing to accept anything logic would arrive at, to actually get to the truth in situations like these.
For those willing to give a fresh look at the Holocaust and a complete review of all the evidence of its falsehood and lack of evidence for its claims, I have uploaded Dissecting the Holocaust to my dropbox. To download it, just go to dropbox.com, type in the email of trodjinn@gmail.com, and the password olives. Download the .pdf file 'Dissecting the Holocaust' and away you go. Trust me, anyone who actually reads that book will be convinced and will change their mind from any previous stance. There is no way, after reading the book in its entirety, for anyone to believe the traditional holocaust narrative afterwards. I took the Holocaust for granted until I read it, and by the end I was absolutely converted. All it took was an open mind. I have an open mind that obeys the Truth, not delusions that are convenient for me, and so the process was quite rapid. For others, they will refuse to ever look into the issue. They are simply cowards or sheep without the intellect to come to their own conclusions. There's a third group that is even more weaselly however. There are people who know full well the holocaust is a fraud, but go on pretending it's true. They enforce the holocaust meme on others and ostracize/condemn those who tell the truth, even though they know it's true. They abandon those who are jailed for holocaust denial and don't speak up for them, even though they know they are innocent of all wrongdoing and simply standing up for truth and justice. This is Uhuru Guru. They do this with various excuses. For the sake of 'respectability.' Or because they don't want to lose their loved ones good opinion. Or because they are afraid to say it due to the authorities. Or because they have a 'master plan' where they will slowly convert people with the easier truths first, and the hardest ones last. Whatever, there's a million reasons to lie, but every single one of them serves the Father of Lies. There is only one reason to tell the truth, and that reason trumps all of them. Truth is an absolute. Truth does not compromise. Truth is not interested in summer soldiers. Either you are a man of integrity and conviction, or a weasel who will say anything at anytime that gains you any advantage. Life without truth is not worth living, this is both philosophically clear and empirically proven. Those who have had to mouth lies all their lives are broken, miserable men on the way to extinction. Not only does it corrupt people's souls and weaken their life-force, but it leads to ludicrous conclusions that no one can counteract that lead to immediate practical harm. For instance, the communists of China felt crops should be planted close together because communism was all about supporting each other and huddling together, and this was just as true of the plant world as the human world. Needless to say, the crops viciously competed with all their nearby 'huddlers' for the nutrients and water, most of them died, and famine broke out killing tens of millions. This obvious lie was known to all the farmers, they had planted the crops distant from each other for thousands of years for a reason, because they knew it worked better that way. But they could not say anything, they could not speak up against the lie for fear of execution, so instead the whole thing was carried out to its inevitable conclusion. A society based on a lie, any lie, will eventually lead to a ludicrous decision like this which will destroy the country. Anyone anywhere who lives a lie is on the path to extinction. The clock is ticking. That is why, from a purely practical point of view, accepting a lie, any lie, anywhere in your society, is a mortal error.
The Holocaust is the only historical event in the world that it is illegal to question. You can have any theory you want over the nuking of Japan, the rape of Nanjing, the firebombing of Dresden, or any older war, but if you question the Holocaust in most of the 1st world, you go to jail. Why? What makes jews so special? What makes their suffering so important that it's blasphemy to challenge it? People can mock and downplay the suffering of Chinese in WWII, who lost 30 million people, not '6 million.' They can mock and downplay the deaths of the Russian people, who lost 20 million people, not '6 million.' But if you mock and downplay the suffering of the jewish people, you are thrown in jail for 'hurting their sensitive feelings' and, basically, blasphemy. The difference is power. Jews currently rule the world, and as a benefit, they get to erect double standards that especially favor them. Holocaust Denial is a crime, no other historical revisionism is. No other country should be homogeneous or control its borders, but Israel has the right to be a homogeneous jewish state with control of their borders. No one else can have anti-miscegenation laws, but in Israel it is illegal for a jew to marry a non-jew. No one else can define their country based on blood kinship, but Israel's definition of jew and law of return is anyone who is descended by blood from a jew, NOT their religious beliefs.
Currently nearly every child in the 1st world is required to learn about the Holocaust in school, there are thousands of holocaust memorial museums, something like 150 movies have been made on the holocaust and multiple new ones come out every year. Not a day goes by without jews reminding us of the Holocaust, how horrible it was, how evil we were for doing it, and how we must do everything in our power to prevent any thinking that might lead to another holocaust someday. All this for the death of '6 million' jews. But what of the 20 million Russians? The 30 million Chinese? The millions of pacific islanders? The millions of Germans? The 10 million Ukrainians and others who died due Stalin's persecutions in the 1930's? Where are their movies? Where are their museums? Where are their classroom lessons? Where are their spokesmen appearing on TV everyday discussing how we can never allow another holodomor? This is a double standard. The jews get to be remembered because they're in power, they control the schools, the media, the movies, and therefore they control what is discussed. They'd prefer to endlessly harp on the suffering of jews and the special victimhood of jews, and thus the sheeple and lemmings accept that and become the willing tools and zombies of this blanket saturation.
How does the Holocaust lie lead to a mortal error in our society? You'd think the exact number of jews who died in a war 60 years ago wouldn't matter one way or another. It should be as meaningless as the number of French who died at Waterloo. But this is how insidious lies are. No matter how trivial it seems, take a lie into your bosom, and the snake will bite, and the venom will spread to every organ, and you Will perish. The Holocaust lie serves two roles, it dampens nationalism everywhere because people fear it might lead to 'another Holocaust.' It associates nationalism with hate and genocide, and thus deters people from accepting it. This restricts people from the best political and philosophical system on earth, leading to the destruction of their civilizations one after another via mass immigration and multiculti cultural relativism. That alone is a mortal error caused by the Holohoax. But it serves another purpose, and that is to make jews an untouchable victim race who can never be criticized no matter what they do. This special force field, the holocaust lie, gives them an immunity to all resistance no matter how evil they are towards others. Have jews just bombed gaza into ruins in retaliation for a rocket that hurt no one? THE HOLOCAUST. Have jews just thrown our economic situation in chaos all over the world due to bad lending and monetary decisions? THE HOLOCAUST. Have jews yet again endlessly lobbied for war with Iraq, Iran, or some other innocent nation causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands? THE HOLOCAUST. Have jews unfairly favored each other in close-knit circles of movie making, book publishing, proffesorships, etc? THE HOLOCAUST. Have jews founded the NAACP, the ADL, the SPLC, the Communist Party, the ANC, and every other subversive organization determined to wipe out whites worldwide? THE HOLOCAUST. And now you see that a random lie about exactly how many jews died in WWII, by being accepted, leads to universal ruin and destruction. There is no such thing as an innocuous, unimportant lie. If the lie is not defeated, it will strangle you to death. If the lie is not pierced, it will crush you. If you do not wield the sword of truth, you will choke to death on the poisonous haze of lies. If you do not follow the straight and narrow path, you will be lost forever in the wilderness. There is no choice in the matter. Either you serve God, who said, quite simply: "I am Truth." Or you serve the Devil, who is, quite simply, The Father of Lies.
When I saw a fellow patriot in need, David Duke, who has done more for whites than any other man on earth, I rushed to his defense and fought the vicious lies being used against him. Uhuru Guru stabbed him in the back, erased the post, and banished me. Between the two, who reacted properly? I have no regrets. If I can't tell the truth, I have no use for such a website. If the website refuses to tell the truth, no reader should have any use in reading it. Compromised as it now is, the entire edifice is just a pile of shit. And as a result, all it can do now is post naked black porn, make stunted, meaninglessly vague statements like 'multiculturalism magically appeared out of nowhere, for no reason, no group is pushing it on us, no people are funding it or propagating it, and there is no reason why it is still believed today.' Gee, what an amazing analysis. Or, we could go where the truth leads us, realize jews, a hyper-smart, hyper-ethnocentric group are determined to create a world that best suits them, but no one else, and then fight them head-on for all we're worth.
This is how Jews view the world:
"Our race is the Master Race. We are divine gods on this planet. We are as different from the inferior races as they are from insects. In fact, compared to our race, other races are beasts and animals, cattle at best. Other races are considered as human excrement. Our destiny is to rule over the inferior races. Our earthly kingdom will be ruled by our leader with a rod of iron. The masses will lick our feet and serve us as our slaves."
--Menachim Begin, FORMER PRESIDENT OF ISRAEL!!
Jews have made their agenda clear. We are to be their cattle or simply crushed like insects under their feet. We are to lick their feet for life. Uhuru Guru is apparently fine with this and strives every day not to offend jews and to censor any criticism of jews off his website. I, however, am not fine with this. I see no reason why I should lick jews' feet or be their cattle. The choice is yours.
Saturday, April 25, 2009
Are Jews Immune to Demographics?
Are Jews Immune to Demographics?
Many people have said jews are genociding the white world, while fiendishly profiting from our loss themselves. Jews will stand above it all, refuse to practice what they preach, and emerge unscathed from the racial chaos. Is this supported by the data though? Or are jews caught in the same ideological trap as they’ve sprung on others? I thought a more thorough data crunch might reveal a different take on Jewish malfeasance. Instead of the ‘double standards’ theory where Jews have one, secret standard for themselves and another, intentionally malicious standard for others, the data better fits a single suicidal standard they apply to themselves and others in the genuine belief it is somehow a noble, moral ideal. This is not the first time religious enthusiasm has led to mass suicide. Jim Jones, the comet of Hale-Bopp, and the Shakers, are other well-known examples of this phenomena. If liberalism is simply a suicide cult, the destructive nature of Jews is revealed as a simple missionary fervor combined with an irrational idea. The only unique part of this cult was how persuasive and influential jews are, thus making it the largest suicide cult in world history, with the most adherents ever assembled.
So which of the models makes more sense? If Jews have one standard meant to undercut the population of whites, and another standard for themselves meant to further their ethnic interests, then we should see a growing Jewish population and a shrinking white population. If Jews are suicidal fanatics with missionary zeal to drag others with them, we should see Jewish population falling at the highest rate and their roped-in lemmings falling alongside them, perhaps at a slower and less dramatic rate.
Assuming nothing revolutionary happens in the world and current trends carry on as normal, how will things look in 2050?
http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/012496.html
The non-Hispanic, single-race white population is projected to be only slightly larger in 2050 (203.3 million) than in 2008 (199.8 million). In fact, this group is projected to lose population in the 2030s and 2040s and comprise 46 percent of the total population in 2050, down from 66 percent in 2008.
Sad news for whites in terms of percentages, but the good news is our population in 2050 will be higher than it is today. The survival instinct of whites in America still seems to be rather strong, far higher than Japanese for instance, who have no jews influencing their decisions at all.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/106625
For the jews the situation is quite different.
The demographic catastrophe presently decimating American Jewry is not in dispute. Without numbing you with statistics, the basic facts are absolutely clear and chilling. The 6 million Jews in America will probably number no more than a couple of million by midcentury.
Until 1960 few Jews married non-Jews. Now more than half of the Jews who marry are marrying unconverted Christians. Only 30 percent of their children, and only 4 percent of their grandchildren are raised as Jews. Some demographers say our birthrate is the lowest of any group in America, so we are now older than any group in America.
So here we have jews losing 2/3 of their population by 2050 while white population slightly grows. Are we looking at diabolical jewish malfeasance applying double standards to further their interests at our expense? Or insane idiots destroying themselves while the rest of America largely looks on with amusement?
Another source for the same 2/3 prediction is at Amren: http://amren.com/ar/2008/05/index.html#article2
Ironically, as Mr. Entine notes, social acceptance and assimilation may yet destroy what pogroms could not. Except for the Orthodox, Jews have very small families, and about half of American and European Jews now marry outside the tribe. In 1920, fewer than 1 percent married out. At current intermarriage rates, notes Mr. Entine, two-thirds of Jews could be gone in a few generations.
Amren is giving us a hint here. How do we get rid of our jews? Easy--watch them implode. If we wait just 40 more years the jewish problem will have largely erased itself.
What about Israel? Is it growing in population such that Jewish ethnic interests are somehow still prospering by present Jewish conduct? Mind you they’re set to lose 4 million jews in America alone, so we’d have to see some dramatic growth in Israel’s jewish population to offset such a loss.
http://books.google.com/books?id=I2PYTmFwQxcC&pg=PA39&lpg=PA39&dq=Israel%2Bpopulation%2Bprojections%2B2050&source=bl&ots=PC_iP1O_Fv&sig=IPBVmh2CoHisah84FZlKZDjC4R0&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result
By 2050, the jewish population would range between 6.9 million and 9.7 million.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/is.html#People
Current jewish population in Israel is 5.4 million. So we are looking at a best case scenario, 4.3 million jew increase in Israel. Not only that, but they are continuously losing percentage ground to the arab Israelis within their borders:
http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/world-jewish-population.htm#_Toc26172079
The overall fertility rate of the Moslems is 4.6%, while that of Israeli Jews is 2.6%. The 110,000 Bedouins of the Negev have the highest fertility rate, with a 5.9% growth rate. Half the Bedouins are below the age of 13. The population doubles every 12 years. Excluding the Bedouins, the Moslem growth rate is 3.2%, still way above the 2.6% of the Jews. Put differently, there are 2.6 births per Jewish woman, against 4.6 births per Moslem woman. (In 1970, there were 9 births per Moslem woman.)
The immigration policy of Israel also favors a demographic shift away from a Jewish population. It is generally believed that 60% of those who have made aliyah in the last ten years are not Jewish.
Looking at world jewish populations then, 2050 will have fewer jews on earth than 2009, and the jews of Israel will be in an even more precarious position than ever. If this is a giant scheme to increase jewish population at the cost of the white host society, even by reaping the benefits in Israel while collecting the money elsewhere, jews are enacting it very poorly. The simpler explanation is Jews have bought into a death cult. The death cult reads like this: women should live sophisticated, self-satisfactory lives defined by their jobs and degrees. Childbirth should be avoided as distracting, a career cost, and generally too demeaning for a woman to do. Women should be wage earners and not rely on men to provide for them so that they can have children early. Instead women should trust no one, and make sure they are independently rich. Women should marry outside the race if this makes them happy, and pay no attention to whether they are preserving their genes, culture, or religion. Divorce should be the answer to all relationship difficulties, abortion should be the answer to all pregnancies. This single standard is being suggested as a wonderful idea for BOTH jews AND non-jews. They are applying it more strictly to themselves than anyone else. So long as whites successfully avoid embracing the death cult, there is no real need to take on the jews. The fact that our population will still be over 200 million by 2050 shows our race has the good sense to largely ignore the lifestyle jews have chosen for themselves.
In conclusion, I suggest jews are not fiendishly pursuing their racial interests by applying double standards that all work to their own good. As far as I can tell, Jews have embraced a death cult and are destroying themselves, along with anyone foolish enough to listen to their siren song. If the white race simply ties ourselves to the mast and puts wax in our ears as we sail by the fading jewish race, if we simply wait them and their silly songs out and sail to the other side of the century, ignoring them for all we’re worth, jews will cease to be of any importance to us pro or con. This suggests an intellectual battle with jewish ideals, but a strategic refrainment from a physical battle that would give jews some new victimization card and slow down our intermarriage rates with jews (which, given their tiny numbers, is solely a biological weapon against them not us). From a moral standpoint, it’s always better when Nature genocides our enemies than when we do, and from a practical standpoint, the last time a country tried to drive out all its jews, it ended up in cinders, so it might not be a good idea to repeat.
Many people have said jews are genociding the white world, while fiendishly profiting from our loss themselves. Jews will stand above it all, refuse to practice what they preach, and emerge unscathed from the racial chaos. Is this supported by the data though? Or are jews caught in the same ideological trap as they’ve sprung on others? I thought a more thorough data crunch might reveal a different take on Jewish malfeasance. Instead of the ‘double standards’ theory where Jews have one, secret standard for themselves and another, intentionally malicious standard for others, the data better fits a single suicidal standard they apply to themselves and others in the genuine belief it is somehow a noble, moral ideal. This is not the first time religious enthusiasm has led to mass suicide. Jim Jones, the comet of Hale-Bopp, and the Shakers, are other well-known examples of this phenomena. If liberalism is simply a suicide cult, the destructive nature of Jews is revealed as a simple missionary fervor combined with an irrational idea. The only unique part of this cult was how persuasive and influential jews are, thus making it the largest suicide cult in world history, with the most adherents ever assembled.
So which of the models makes more sense? If Jews have one standard meant to undercut the population of whites, and another standard for themselves meant to further their ethnic interests, then we should see a growing Jewish population and a shrinking white population. If Jews are suicidal fanatics with missionary zeal to drag others with them, we should see Jewish population falling at the highest rate and their roped-in lemmings falling alongside them, perhaps at a slower and less dramatic rate.
Assuming nothing revolutionary happens in the world and current trends carry on as normal, how will things look in 2050?
http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/releases/archives/population/012496.html
The non-Hispanic, single-race white population is projected to be only slightly larger in 2050 (203.3 million) than in 2008 (199.8 million). In fact, this group is projected to lose population in the 2030s and 2040s and comprise 46 percent of the total population in 2050, down from 66 percent in 2008.
Sad news for whites in terms of percentages, but the good news is our population in 2050 will be higher than it is today. The survival instinct of whites in America still seems to be rather strong, far higher than Japanese for instance, who have no jews influencing their decisions at all.
http://www.newsweek.com/id/106625
For the jews the situation is quite different.
The demographic catastrophe presently decimating American Jewry is not in dispute. Without numbing you with statistics, the basic facts are absolutely clear and chilling. The 6 million Jews in America will probably number no more than a couple of million by midcentury.
Until 1960 few Jews married non-Jews. Now more than half of the Jews who marry are marrying unconverted Christians. Only 30 percent of their children, and only 4 percent of their grandchildren are raised as Jews. Some demographers say our birthrate is the lowest of any group in America, so we are now older than any group in America.
So here we have jews losing 2/3 of their population by 2050 while white population slightly grows. Are we looking at diabolical jewish malfeasance applying double standards to further their interests at our expense? Or insane idiots destroying themselves while the rest of America largely looks on with amusement?
Another source for the same 2/3 prediction is at Amren: http://amren.com/ar/2008/05/index.html#article2
Ironically, as Mr. Entine notes, social acceptance and assimilation may yet destroy what pogroms could not. Except for the Orthodox, Jews have very small families, and about half of American and European Jews now marry outside the tribe. In 1920, fewer than 1 percent married out. At current intermarriage rates, notes Mr. Entine, two-thirds of Jews could be gone in a few generations.
Amren is giving us a hint here. How do we get rid of our jews? Easy--watch them implode. If we wait just 40 more years the jewish problem will have largely erased itself.
What about Israel? Is it growing in population such that Jewish ethnic interests are somehow still prospering by present Jewish conduct? Mind you they’re set to lose 4 million jews in America alone, so we’d have to see some dramatic growth in Israel’s jewish population to offset such a loss.
http://books.google.com/books?id=I2PYTmFwQxcC&pg=PA39&lpg=PA39&dq=Israel%2Bpopulation%2Bprojections%2B2050&source=bl&ots=PC_iP1O_Fv&sig=IPBVmh2CoHisah84FZlKZDjC4R0&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result
By 2050, the jewish population would range between 6.9 million and 9.7 million.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/is.html#People
Current jewish population in Israel is 5.4 million. So we are looking at a best case scenario, 4.3 million jew increase in Israel. Not only that, but they are continuously losing percentage ground to the arab Israelis within their borders:
http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/world-jewish-population.htm#_Toc26172079
The overall fertility rate of the Moslems is 4.6%, while that of Israeli Jews is 2.6%. The 110,000 Bedouins of the Negev have the highest fertility rate, with a 5.9% growth rate. Half the Bedouins are below the age of 13. The population doubles every 12 years. Excluding the Bedouins, the Moslem growth rate is 3.2%, still way above the 2.6% of the Jews. Put differently, there are 2.6 births per Jewish woman, against 4.6 births per Moslem woman. (In 1970, there were 9 births per Moslem woman.)
The immigration policy of Israel also favors a demographic shift away from a Jewish population. It is generally believed that 60% of those who have made aliyah in the last ten years are not Jewish.
Looking at world jewish populations then, 2050 will have fewer jews on earth than 2009, and the jews of Israel will be in an even more precarious position than ever. If this is a giant scheme to increase jewish population at the cost of the white host society, even by reaping the benefits in Israel while collecting the money elsewhere, jews are enacting it very poorly. The simpler explanation is Jews have bought into a death cult. The death cult reads like this: women should live sophisticated, self-satisfactory lives defined by their jobs and degrees. Childbirth should be avoided as distracting, a career cost, and generally too demeaning for a woman to do. Women should be wage earners and not rely on men to provide for them so that they can have children early. Instead women should trust no one, and make sure they are independently rich. Women should marry outside the race if this makes them happy, and pay no attention to whether they are preserving their genes, culture, or religion. Divorce should be the answer to all relationship difficulties, abortion should be the answer to all pregnancies. This single standard is being suggested as a wonderful idea for BOTH jews AND non-jews. They are applying it more strictly to themselves than anyone else. So long as whites successfully avoid embracing the death cult, there is no real need to take on the jews. The fact that our population will still be over 200 million by 2050 shows our race has the good sense to largely ignore the lifestyle jews have chosen for themselves.
In conclusion, I suggest jews are not fiendishly pursuing their racial interests by applying double standards that all work to their own good. As far as I can tell, Jews have embraced a death cult and are destroying themselves, along with anyone foolish enough to listen to their siren song. If the white race simply ties ourselves to the mast and puts wax in our ears as we sail by the fading jewish race, if we simply wait them and their silly songs out and sail to the other side of the century, ignoring them for all we’re worth, jews will cease to be of any importance to us pro or con. This suggests an intellectual battle with jewish ideals, but a strategic refrainment from a physical battle that would give jews some new victimization card and slow down our intermarriage rates with jews (which, given their tiny numbers, is solely a biological weapon against them not us). From a moral standpoint, it’s always better when Nature genocides our enemies than when we do, and from a practical standpoint, the last time a country tried to drive out all its jews, it ended up in cinders, so it might not be a good idea to repeat.
Crack this Walnut
Crack this Walnut
Genes have loose correlations to all sorts of things. Personality, behavior, beliefs, ideals, emotional tendencies, and of course the mother of them all IQ.
However, none of these correlations are 100%. Many are as low as 20%. What would become of a society that accepted genetic differences, good and bad, and concentrated solely on developing everyone we can to their fullest potential? For instance, suppose someone has a genetic predisposition to alcoholism. If raised correctly, and with enough force of will, this person can avoid drinking and thus never become an alcoholic. Here we have genes weaving their nefarious webs, and culture cutting right through them. How many other victories could we as a nation, and we as individuals, score over our genetic default?
Is there really no hope of progress, no chance at a better life? Are we doomed to repeat the same mistakes over and over, we as individuals and we as groups, just because we have certain tendencies, or correlations, or predispositions, towards those things? There are no 100% correlations between genes and anything else. This means nothing is decided, no one is past hope, we can always change people for the better—if only we try hard enough.
At a certain period in US history, blacks were all free, and were also committing very few crimes, they wore respectable dress, they had a solid family life, and for all intents and purposes they were completely harmless additions to our society. Take a picture of blacks in 1910, 1920, or what have you and they look just like anyone else. No government handouts were being rewarded to them, no drug gangs were infesting inner cities, nothing. The genes of the black race probably haven’t changed much in the last few generations, but their behavior certainly has. This means culture can determine everything. Who cares if blacks start from a lower base? They can still become decent fellows with good lives, perfectly integrated into our society and economy. Ditch the bad habits, relearn the lessons of the past, and blacks will be as good as new.
If even blacks can perform well, with their genetic flaws, what then of any other race? Do we really believe hispanics are irretrievably bad, when blacks wore dapper coats and hats just a century ago? When blacks bowed to the ladies, didn’t cause trouble, and went to work just like the rest of us? What about arabs, asians, subcons, amerindians? Is there nothing culture couldn’t cure? So long as people obey the law, earn their keep, and leave us free to associate with whom we choose, what harm are they doing us? Sure, theoretically, a higher population puts a strain on public goods and resources, but without any handouts luring degenerates into the country, we can be assured they’ll always contribute more to the economy than they’ll cost.
What if we could develop some perfect government policy, some perfect set of laws, that would allow all races to coexist and even thrive in harmony? Suppose we gave pre-natal care to pregnant minorities, followed by the perfect schooling starting from age 1, insist the children be given breast feeding for the first six months, banish all possibility of drug use (singapore did it, so can we) and require babies only be born into stable married homes? Suppose we gave a citizen’s dividend to all married couples that could help pay for their health care and made corresponding laws requiring people lead healthy lives? Suppose we taught children in new, unorthodox manners that show much better results than our current ‘sit in a desk all day’ classrooms manage? Why won’t we even try? It’s heartless to simply give up on someone, simply because it would be easier on a genetically ‘fitter’ individual. That ‘fitter’ individual doesn’t exist, this one does. He’s alive, he’s suffering, and he needs our help. It’s too late to dream of an easier task with some 20% improvement due to some genetic correlation, we have a real breathing human, who like it or not is here and has to be taken care of, with the genes they like it or not have. Let’s work around it—has anyone bothered to even try?
Blacks don’t perform well in school. So change the schools to something that they perform well in. Teach them something they’re good at, or become good at teaching them. Does anyone seriously believe 2009 is the last word in education, that there is no way to improve our schools, whatsoever? That despite our lack of perfection in every other field, education is done, we’ve maximized its potential, it is just the optimal schooling experience that even Jesus has set up for babies in heaven?
Blacks have a crime problem. Well, when was there less crime? What were people doing in that age? Can we mimic that period? Can we bring back their policies? What was it? A no-nonsense enforcement policy? Higher culturual expectations and ostracism of ne’er do wells? Why can’t we bring it back? If there was any time blacks were doing less crime, we know we at least have the potential to bring it back to that level.
Voting has become a grab-bag for ethnic and special interests. Well then, when did voting work better? Was there a time when votes were limited and the results more rewarding for our republic? Could we not change voting to rest more on merit, or have some other qualifications, or change government entirely to something that might work better? If minority voting habits are a problem—change voting! Why immediately insist on going after the minority? There’s more than one way to skin a cat---and this way is more humane, which is all that matters. People come first, not projects.
Jews are defrauding us of trillions of dollars by gaming the business world. Well when were they not defrauding us? Perhaps we could change the way debt works, or perhaps the fed could be abolished, or new regulations be set so that such fraudulent practices would be illegal? America has had many recessions and the economy is a complicated business. Mistakes will be made, but there’s no need to get out the tar and feathers. Every time a crash occurs, we learn something, all we have to do is culturally apply what we’ve learned. With a proper set of laws, it will become impossible for anyone, regardless of the malice in their hearts, to steal from anyone. All it takes is a serious interest and effort in making things transparent, fair, and safe for the everyday investor.
Muslims are taught silly things in their Koran that promotes violence. Well, why don’t we teach them a different way in our schools, and show them love is always better than hate? It’s not like terrorism is a big deal, it kills fewer people than car accidents do every year. What is a big deal is giving up on millions of people, all fellow human beings, who if we tried even just a little could be shown the western cultural way. So long as muslims don’t do crime, go to work, and aren’t rioting in the streets, we can forgive each other our differences and move on! Life is too good to concentrate on what your neighbor is doing in the privacy of their homes, or what they are thinking in the privacy of their heads!
Sure diversity causes problems we wouldn’t ordinarily have. But let’s face it, so long as rich people have jobs, and poor people need them, diversity is going to happen. And more importantly, they’re already here. We can’t do anything about it now, they’ve just as much a right to live here as anyone else does. All we can do is try to make the best of it, for everyone’s sake. Are they suffering from a disease? Let’s get together and cure it. Do they have bad moral habits? Let’s get together and raise them right. Do they have a tendency to violence? Let’s teach them what is and what isn’t acceptable. Do they vote the wrong way? Let’s change government until only correct decisions are capable of being made. Do they make too little money? Let’s provide a generous citizen’s dividend that will help ends meet. After all, the rich of this country, the top 1%, earn as much as the bottom 50%! That kind of balance is disgusting, and I doubt it’s merited either. Regardless, the first few thousand dollars someone receives can buy food, clean water, a place to stay —the next few billion can only buy yachts and chandeliers--who needs it? We should be looking out for everyone, after all, we’re all in this together. A little less poverty goes a long way. People will not be as sick, if they just have a good diet and a good neighborhood--in the end it will save us money by avoiding all the complications poverty brings to people down the road. There’s so much we can do! Lots of people have good suggestions. Republicans want to be tough on crime--fine! Democrats want to provide better health care--good! Republicans want school choice--excellent! Democrats want school funding--let’s do it! What we all want is the betterment of our people’s lives. A place we can live, and our children can live, in peace and prosperity. Think for a second, what would YOU do to improve the life of EVERYONE in this country, from the most genetic superman to the lowest genetic reject? Think of that one change that would rise all boats, across the board, that you’d implement if you could. And then go do it! Make a crusade out of it. Go for it!
Do you want mothers to breast feed their children, because it rises IQ by 5 points and helps the child’s immune system forever--children of any color? How much would it hurt to change that? Let’s do it!
Do you want children as young as 1 to 5 year olds being given a healthy, nutritious diet no matter where they live? Do you want young children to receive top quality daycare that’s proven to energize and engage children’s minds? Let’s do it! How much could it cost? How much more will it cost, rather, if we DON’T do it? If we abandon these children, who in turn will someday abandon their country, and cause the chaos we so abhor?
Do you want english to be taught to all children at the time they learn it best, so we have a common language we can engage each other in, as one nation, as one people? Do you want english to be as innate to hispanics and haitians as it is to the purest boston clubhouse? Let’s legislate it! Test scores are certain to rise when hispancis aren’t busy trying to translate everything into their native tongue, before they can even address the question.
Life could be so much better, we know it can, in so many ways. Off the top of my head, I know of 30 different changes that would improve the life of every single human on earth, if only they gave it a shot. When we are so deficient as nurturers, what does nature have to do with it? Suppose we are stuck in a brace, blindfolded, our hands are tied behind our backs, and there’s a gag in our mouth. Now someone walks up and says to you: “You know why you can’t win this 100 meter dash? it’s because your genes are just too weak! If you simply had better genes, you could’ve been the winner. But now we’re carting you off to Ecuador, and good riddance!”
If only you could protest through your gag, you could tell him that the genes had nothing to do with it, it was really the blindfold, the hand tying, and the brace holding you back. And that with all those things removed, heck, you could’ve given the race quite a shot! This is how race-on-the-brains determinists are thinking, and it’s positively insane. Sure, maybe in the end they still couldn’t run as fast as a rocket. But you know what, they could run pretty damn fast. All we have to do is work together, and give it a real, honest-to-goodness shot. Until we have gotten the best out of everyone, how do we know it isn’t good enough? How do we know it isn’t wonderful? Lovable? Beautiful? Brilliant? Inspiring? Great? How do we know? How can we judge until we’ve let them bloom? There’s nothing wrong in this country that couldn’t be made better, with the very people living in it today. If we’ve done everything and made it as good as we can, and you’re still not content--well okay THEN tell us we were wrong, and we’ll admit it and apologize. Until then, taking into account the humaneness of our position, and the compassion we must all feel for our fellow man, what reason to jump the gun? I won’t question your motives or intentions, but I still can’t help but think how sad it must be to turn to violence, exclusion, and hate as the first and only recourse to every problem. If your daughter said she wasn’t going to eat the broccoli, do you get out the hammer and slug her across the head? Or do you work with her? Individuals make mistakes, societies make mistakes. Sometimes they do the wrong thing. The important thing is to love them, forgive them, and teach them a better way. Life is a process, there is no end point. If you let love enter your heart, you’ll always find a way to make up. This world is big enough for all of us, nurture is powerful enough to lift all boats, so let’s put the hammers away and give it another go, okay?
Genes have loose correlations to all sorts of things. Personality, behavior, beliefs, ideals, emotional tendencies, and of course the mother of them all IQ.
However, none of these correlations are 100%. Many are as low as 20%. What would become of a society that accepted genetic differences, good and bad, and concentrated solely on developing everyone we can to their fullest potential? For instance, suppose someone has a genetic predisposition to alcoholism. If raised correctly, and with enough force of will, this person can avoid drinking and thus never become an alcoholic. Here we have genes weaving their nefarious webs, and culture cutting right through them. How many other victories could we as a nation, and we as individuals, score over our genetic default?
Is there really no hope of progress, no chance at a better life? Are we doomed to repeat the same mistakes over and over, we as individuals and we as groups, just because we have certain tendencies, or correlations, or predispositions, towards those things? There are no 100% correlations between genes and anything else. This means nothing is decided, no one is past hope, we can always change people for the better—if only we try hard enough.
At a certain period in US history, blacks were all free, and were also committing very few crimes, they wore respectable dress, they had a solid family life, and for all intents and purposes they were completely harmless additions to our society. Take a picture of blacks in 1910, 1920, or what have you and they look just like anyone else. No government handouts were being rewarded to them, no drug gangs were infesting inner cities, nothing. The genes of the black race probably haven’t changed much in the last few generations, but their behavior certainly has. This means culture can determine everything. Who cares if blacks start from a lower base? They can still become decent fellows with good lives, perfectly integrated into our society and economy. Ditch the bad habits, relearn the lessons of the past, and blacks will be as good as new.
If even blacks can perform well, with their genetic flaws, what then of any other race? Do we really believe hispanics are irretrievably bad, when blacks wore dapper coats and hats just a century ago? When blacks bowed to the ladies, didn’t cause trouble, and went to work just like the rest of us? What about arabs, asians, subcons, amerindians? Is there nothing culture couldn’t cure? So long as people obey the law, earn their keep, and leave us free to associate with whom we choose, what harm are they doing us? Sure, theoretically, a higher population puts a strain on public goods and resources, but without any handouts luring degenerates into the country, we can be assured they’ll always contribute more to the economy than they’ll cost.
What if we could develop some perfect government policy, some perfect set of laws, that would allow all races to coexist and even thrive in harmony? Suppose we gave pre-natal care to pregnant minorities, followed by the perfect schooling starting from age 1, insist the children be given breast feeding for the first six months, banish all possibility of drug use (singapore did it, so can we) and require babies only be born into stable married homes? Suppose we gave a citizen’s dividend to all married couples that could help pay for their health care and made corresponding laws requiring people lead healthy lives? Suppose we taught children in new, unorthodox manners that show much better results than our current ‘sit in a desk all day’ classrooms manage? Why won’t we even try? It’s heartless to simply give up on someone, simply because it would be easier on a genetically ‘fitter’ individual. That ‘fitter’ individual doesn’t exist, this one does. He’s alive, he’s suffering, and he needs our help. It’s too late to dream of an easier task with some 20% improvement due to some genetic correlation, we have a real breathing human, who like it or not is here and has to be taken care of, with the genes they like it or not have. Let’s work around it—has anyone bothered to even try?
Blacks don’t perform well in school. So change the schools to something that they perform well in. Teach them something they’re good at, or become good at teaching them. Does anyone seriously believe 2009 is the last word in education, that there is no way to improve our schools, whatsoever? That despite our lack of perfection in every other field, education is done, we’ve maximized its potential, it is just the optimal schooling experience that even Jesus has set up for babies in heaven?
Blacks have a crime problem. Well, when was there less crime? What were people doing in that age? Can we mimic that period? Can we bring back their policies? What was it? A no-nonsense enforcement policy? Higher culturual expectations and ostracism of ne’er do wells? Why can’t we bring it back? If there was any time blacks were doing less crime, we know we at least have the potential to bring it back to that level.
Voting has become a grab-bag for ethnic and special interests. Well then, when did voting work better? Was there a time when votes were limited and the results more rewarding for our republic? Could we not change voting to rest more on merit, or have some other qualifications, or change government entirely to something that might work better? If minority voting habits are a problem—change voting! Why immediately insist on going after the minority? There’s more than one way to skin a cat---and this way is more humane, which is all that matters. People come first, not projects.
Jews are defrauding us of trillions of dollars by gaming the business world. Well when were they not defrauding us? Perhaps we could change the way debt works, or perhaps the fed could be abolished, or new regulations be set so that such fraudulent practices would be illegal? America has had many recessions and the economy is a complicated business. Mistakes will be made, but there’s no need to get out the tar and feathers. Every time a crash occurs, we learn something, all we have to do is culturally apply what we’ve learned. With a proper set of laws, it will become impossible for anyone, regardless of the malice in their hearts, to steal from anyone. All it takes is a serious interest and effort in making things transparent, fair, and safe for the everyday investor.
Muslims are taught silly things in their Koran that promotes violence. Well, why don’t we teach them a different way in our schools, and show them love is always better than hate? It’s not like terrorism is a big deal, it kills fewer people than car accidents do every year. What is a big deal is giving up on millions of people, all fellow human beings, who if we tried even just a little could be shown the western cultural way. So long as muslims don’t do crime, go to work, and aren’t rioting in the streets, we can forgive each other our differences and move on! Life is too good to concentrate on what your neighbor is doing in the privacy of their homes, or what they are thinking in the privacy of their heads!
Sure diversity causes problems we wouldn’t ordinarily have. But let’s face it, so long as rich people have jobs, and poor people need them, diversity is going to happen. And more importantly, they’re already here. We can’t do anything about it now, they’ve just as much a right to live here as anyone else does. All we can do is try to make the best of it, for everyone’s sake. Are they suffering from a disease? Let’s get together and cure it. Do they have bad moral habits? Let’s get together and raise them right. Do they have a tendency to violence? Let’s teach them what is and what isn’t acceptable. Do they vote the wrong way? Let’s change government until only correct decisions are capable of being made. Do they make too little money? Let’s provide a generous citizen’s dividend that will help ends meet. After all, the rich of this country, the top 1%, earn as much as the bottom 50%! That kind of balance is disgusting, and I doubt it’s merited either. Regardless, the first few thousand dollars someone receives can buy food, clean water, a place to stay —the next few billion can only buy yachts and chandeliers--who needs it? We should be looking out for everyone, after all, we’re all in this together. A little less poverty goes a long way. People will not be as sick, if they just have a good diet and a good neighborhood--in the end it will save us money by avoiding all the complications poverty brings to people down the road. There’s so much we can do! Lots of people have good suggestions. Republicans want to be tough on crime--fine! Democrats want to provide better health care--good! Republicans want school choice--excellent! Democrats want school funding--let’s do it! What we all want is the betterment of our people’s lives. A place we can live, and our children can live, in peace and prosperity. Think for a second, what would YOU do to improve the life of EVERYONE in this country, from the most genetic superman to the lowest genetic reject? Think of that one change that would rise all boats, across the board, that you’d implement if you could. And then go do it! Make a crusade out of it. Go for it!
Do you want mothers to breast feed their children, because it rises IQ by 5 points and helps the child’s immune system forever--children of any color? How much would it hurt to change that? Let’s do it!
Do you want children as young as 1 to 5 year olds being given a healthy, nutritious diet no matter where they live? Do you want young children to receive top quality daycare that’s proven to energize and engage children’s minds? Let’s do it! How much could it cost? How much more will it cost, rather, if we DON’T do it? If we abandon these children, who in turn will someday abandon their country, and cause the chaos we so abhor?
Do you want english to be taught to all children at the time they learn it best, so we have a common language we can engage each other in, as one nation, as one people? Do you want english to be as innate to hispanics and haitians as it is to the purest boston clubhouse? Let’s legislate it! Test scores are certain to rise when hispancis aren’t busy trying to translate everything into their native tongue, before they can even address the question.
Life could be so much better, we know it can, in so many ways. Off the top of my head, I know of 30 different changes that would improve the life of every single human on earth, if only they gave it a shot. When we are so deficient as nurturers, what does nature have to do with it? Suppose we are stuck in a brace, blindfolded, our hands are tied behind our backs, and there’s a gag in our mouth. Now someone walks up and says to you: “You know why you can’t win this 100 meter dash? it’s because your genes are just too weak! If you simply had better genes, you could’ve been the winner. But now we’re carting you off to Ecuador, and good riddance!”
If only you could protest through your gag, you could tell him that the genes had nothing to do with it, it was really the blindfold, the hand tying, and the brace holding you back. And that with all those things removed, heck, you could’ve given the race quite a shot! This is how race-on-the-brains determinists are thinking, and it’s positively insane. Sure, maybe in the end they still couldn’t run as fast as a rocket. But you know what, they could run pretty damn fast. All we have to do is work together, and give it a real, honest-to-goodness shot. Until we have gotten the best out of everyone, how do we know it isn’t good enough? How do we know it isn’t wonderful? Lovable? Beautiful? Brilliant? Inspiring? Great? How do we know? How can we judge until we’ve let them bloom? There’s nothing wrong in this country that couldn’t be made better, with the very people living in it today. If we’ve done everything and made it as good as we can, and you’re still not content--well okay THEN tell us we were wrong, and we’ll admit it and apologize. Until then, taking into account the humaneness of our position, and the compassion we must all feel for our fellow man, what reason to jump the gun? I won’t question your motives or intentions, but I still can’t help but think how sad it must be to turn to violence, exclusion, and hate as the first and only recourse to every problem. If your daughter said she wasn’t going to eat the broccoli, do you get out the hammer and slug her across the head? Or do you work with her? Individuals make mistakes, societies make mistakes. Sometimes they do the wrong thing. The important thing is to love them, forgive them, and teach them a better way. Life is a process, there is no end point. If you let love enter your heart, you’ll always find a way to make up. This world is big enough for all of us, nurture is powerful enough to lift all boats, so let’s put the hammers away and give it another go, okay?
Argue the Facts First, Opinions Second:
Argue the Facts First, Opinions Second:
January 31st, 2009
Here is my problem with arguing with anyone, about anything:
If we don’t share the same knowledge of facts, we’ll never agree about our opinions. And if, miraculously, our opinions do agree but for entirely different reasons, I’m still not happy because I think their reasons for agreeing are disagreeable. I have found it impossible to argue my beliefs with friends and family, because they are so factually ignorant that everything I say will sound crazy or evil to them. How can you have a genuine argument or debate with someone, when the other side doesn’t know anything, and thus no logical reasoning from that knowledgable base can be done?
Here’s a simple fact, women on average score 4 IQ points lower than men. This has profound implications. Is this perhaps why women aren’t as highly represented on CEO boards, elite positions, and nobel prizes? Should we really give women equal say in politics–was there a reason why we never used to? Perhaps women aren’t as suited as men are at making money and should stay at home with the kids, a simple job they’re bio-engineered for?
I’m not going to argue one position or another, but I will make this argument: Until everyone learns the fact that women on average have a lower IQ than men, we can never have a reasonable discussion about these questions. Anyone who suggests the above will be called all sorts of names, thrown out of the room, and likely fired from his job and divorced by his wife. Why? Because people have become so indoctrinated, so brainwashed, that no one can speak to them on the basis of the facts, instead of the lies they have been told since childhood. I am fine with arguing with people who possess the same facts but come to different interpretations thereof. I am fine with arguing with people who see the same thing and come to a different conclusion. There is a wonderful difference between these sorts of arguments, and the arguments of today. In an argument where both people know the facts, it is easy to sympathize and understand the other person’s point of view. It is easy to see that people are well intentioned, honest, and good people underneath who are capable of changing their mind if further proof were provided. When people are operating from completely different sets of facts, it is impossible to sympathize or understand their point of view. In an honest world that starts with the truth and then works from there, you have a sort of socratic philosophy club. Friends get together, discuss right and wrong, have dinner and go home, delighted with what they’ve shared. In a dishonest world where the truth is suppressed and heresy becomes a crime, mutual hostility and demonization sets in. There is no possibility of agreement, no possibility of compromise, it is war to the bitter end. They will hate you, consider you the ultimate evil, do anything to shut you up. You, meanwhile, will despise them, consider them the ultimate evil, and would do anything to overthrow their tyrannical rule. What a difference mutual knowledge of the facts makes!
This is why a rally with a bunch of flags shouting slogans as people march down the streets, is such a pointless, self-defeating effort. You are trying to spread your opinions, but not your facts! No one will ever spontaneously hear “White pride!” and think “Hey, that sounds like a good idea!” and jump into the crowd. They have to know where we are coming from, how we got to our views, why they should feel the same way.
Even worse if if people have come to our views Without any basis in fact. If someone asks you, “why do you hate black people so much?” And you tell them, “I don’t know, I have no reason to, I just woke up one day and realized–I hate black people. I hate them so much I want to kill them. And I’ve been telling other people we should kill black people ever since.” Who are you going to convert???? We have to have full mastery of the facts, we need statistics dripping off our fingertips. We need sources, books, articles, links, the whole shebang, and we need to reserve our opinions until they’re ready to hear it. It’s a lot easier to discuss facts with people who know you’re a decent, good person ahead of time. Then it’s a lot easier to discuss opinions with people who know the same facts you do. Inspire trust through personal conduct, inspire good sense through teaching of the facts, inspire pro-white opinions by reasoning from the facts.
Here’s a short list of books everyone should read before they go proselytyzing to the masses. I’ll confess that I haven’t read them all myself, but I’m working on it:
Human Accomplishment by Charles Murray. The Bell Curve by Charles Murray. Race, Evolution, and Behavior by Rushton. IQ and the Wealth of Nations/IQ and Global Ineqaulity by Lynn and Vanahu. Understanding Human History by Hart. The Camp of the Saints by Raspaille. Ethnic Genetic Interests by Salter.
If you wish people to learn about the threat of Islam, read Prophet of Doom by Craig Winn.
If you want to attack the jews, read Culture of Critique by Kevin Macdonald, Jewish Supremacism by David Duke, or Dissecting the Holocaust by Germar Rudolf.
Encourage other people to read the same books you have, give them short summaries of the author’s views in the most non-threatening manner, and be enthusiastic about how much you learned from it. Offer to read books from the other side that argue the opposite point of view that they adhere to, trade time for each other where you can get to know each other’s facts. Listen to their points and give them credit where they’re due. Teach facts first, opinions later. I suspect this is the correct way to indoctrinate our kids too. Encourage them to read these books, talk with them about it after they’re done, and see if you can give them a pro-white viewpoint that will help them throughout their lives. If nothing else, you don’t want your daughter dating a black guy who will likely abuse her, give her an STD, get her pregnant and leave, etc.
If there are any other books that are vital to the cause, please suggest them to me! If you’re spreading the pro-white message without any facts or books, please take the time to read them first. If each one of us converts even one other person in our lives, and they go on to convert just one other person themselves, soon enough the whole world would agree with us. But what that means is we can’t burn bridges and just agree to hate the entire world in a fump. We’ve got to engage with people, we’ve got to argue with them, and it’s got to be in a Socratic, polite, and friendly way. Once they know the facts, they’ll sympathize with us even if they don’t agree. They’ll go easier on us, and that’s already a win.
January 31st, 2009
Here is my problem with arguing with anyone, about anything:
If we don’t share the same knowledge of facts, we’ll never agree about our opinions. And if, miraculously, our opinions do agree but for entirely different reasons, I’m still not happy because I think their reasons for agreeing are disagreeable. I have found it impossible to argue my beliefs with friends and family, because they are so factually ignorant that everything I say will sound crazy or evil to them. How can you have a genuine argument or debate with someone, when the other side doesn’t know anything, and thus no logical reasoning from that knowledgable base can be done?
Here’s a simple fact, women on average score 4 IQ points lower than men. This has profound implications. Is this perhaps why women aren’t as highly represented on CEO boards, elite positions, and nobel prizes? Should we really give women equal say in politics–was there a reason why we never used to? Perhaps women aren’t as suited as men are at making money and should stay at home with the kids, a simple job they’re bio-engineered for?
I’m not going to argue one position or another, but I will make this argument: Until everyone learns the fact that women on average have a lower IQ than men, we can never have a reasonable discussion about these questions. Anyone who suggests the above will be called all sorts of names, thrown out of the room, and likely fired from his job and divorced by his wife. Why? Because people have become so indoctrinated, so brainwashed, that no one can speak to them on the basis of the facts, instead of the lies they have been told since childhood. I am fine with arguing with people who possess the same facts but come to different interpretations thereof. I am fine with arguing with people who see the same thing and come to a different conclusion. There is a wonderful difference between these sorts of arguments, and the arguments of today. In an argument where both people know the facts, it is easy to sympathize and understand the other person’s point of view. It is easy to see that people are well intentioned, honest, and good people underneath who are capable of changing their mind if further proof were provided. When people are operating from completely different sets of facts, it is impossible to sympathize or understand their point of view. In an honest world that starts with the truth and then works from there, you have a sort of socratic philosophy club. Friends get together, discuss right and wrong, have dinner and go home, delighted with what they’ve shared. In a dishonest world where the truth is suppressed and heresy becomes a crime, mutual hostility and demonization sets in. There is no possibility of agreement, no possibility of compromise, it is war to the bitter end. They will hate you, consider you the ultimate evil, do anything to shut you up. You, meanwhile, will despise them, consider them the ultimate evil, and would do anything to overthrow their tyrannical rule. What a difference mutual knowledge of the facts makes!
This is why a rally with a bunch of flags shouting slogans as people march down the streets, is such a pointless, self-defeating effort. You are trying to spread your opinions, but not your facts! No one will ever spontaneously hear “White pride!” and think “Hey, that sounds like a good idea!” and jump into the crowd. They have to know where we are coming from, how we got to our views, why they should feel the same way.
Even worse if if people have come to our views Without any basis in fact. If someone asks you, “why do you hate black people so much?” And you tell them, “I don’t know, I have no reason to, I just woke up one day and realized–I hate black people. I hate them so much I want to kill them. And I’ve been telling other people we should kill black people ever since.” Who are you going to convert???? We have to have full mastery of the facts, we need statistics dripping off our fingertips. We need sources, books, articles, links, the whole shebang, and we need to reserve our opinions until they’re ready to hear it. It’s a lot easier to discuss facts with people who know you’re a decent, good person ahead of time. Then it’s a lot easier to discuss opinions with people who know the same facts you do. Inspire trust through personal conduct, inspire good sense through teaching of the facts, inspire pro-white opinions by reasoning from the facts.
Here’s a short list of books everyone should read before they go proselytyzing to the masses. I’ll confess that I haven’t read them all myself, but I’m working on it:
Human Accomplishment by Charles Murray. The Bell Curve by Charles Murray. Race, Evolution, and Behavior by Rushton. IQ and the Wealth of Nations/IQ and Global Ineqaulity by Lynn and Vanahu. Understanding Human History by Hart. The Camp of the Saints by Raspaille. Ethnic Genetic Interests by Salter.
If you wish people to learn about the threat of Islam, read Prophet of Doom by Craig Winn.
If you want to attack the jews, read Culture of Critique by Kevin Macdonald, Jewish Supremacism by David Duke, or Dissecting the Holocaust by Germar Rudolf.
Encourage other people to read the same books you have, give them short summaries of the author’s views in the most non-threatening manner, and be enthusiastic about how much you learned from it. Offer to read books from the other side that argue the opposite point of view that they adhere to, trade time for each other where you can get to know each other’s facts. Listen to their points and give them credit where they’re due. Teach facts first, opinions later. I suspect this is the correct way to indoctrinate our kids too. Encourage them to read these books, talk with them about it after they’re done, and see if you can give them a pro-white viewpoint that will help them throughout their lives. If nothing else, you don’t want your daughter dating a black guy who will likely abuse her, give her an STD, get her pregnant and leave, etc.
If there are any other books that are vital to the cause, please suggest them to me! If you’re spreading the pro-white message without any facts or books, please take the time to read them first. If each one of us converts even one other person in our lives, and they go on to convert just one other person themselves, soon enough the whole world would agree with us. But what that means is we can’t burn bridges and just agree to hate the entire world in a fump. We’ve got to engage with people, we’ve got to argue with them, and it’s got to be in a Socratic, polite, and friendly way. Once they know the facts, they’ll sympathize with us even if they don’t agree. They’ll go easier on us, and that’s already a win.
Truth Spares No One
Truth Spares No One
February 3rd, 2009
‘There is not a truth existing that I fear or would wish unknown to the whole world.’ — Thomas Jefferson.
There are two types of people on earth. Those willing to accept the verdict of truth, regardless of how it reflects on them personally, or their pet causes, or how uncomfortable it might be; and those who don’t.
If you adopt only those truths which suit you, while denying those truths which you find distasteful, like some sort of chinese menu, you are a coward, a hypocrite, and a cur.
Race realism has a wonderful purpose. Its purpose is to shatter people’s illusions and force people to accept the truth through continuous presenting of evidence, science, genetics, history, geography, the news, whatever reveals the essence of racial differences that so invalidate the fantasy world of equalitarians. But race realism does not exist to serve whites, it exists to serve truth. If Jews are found to be smarter than whites, then race realism requires we accept that. If East Asians are found to be less criminal, have fewer illegitimate children, or a lower divorce rate, race realism requires we accept that. If blacks have bigger dicks and can sprint fast, race realism requires we accept that.
Race realism is a tiny subset of the truth that exists about this world. There is plenty of truth out there. Evolution is real, religion is false, gender matters, homosexuals are mentally ill, HIV causes AIDS, the free market is the best generator of wealth, democracy is fundamentally flawed, divorce causes lasting harm to kids, and star trek sucks compared to star wars.
People who wrap themselves in their pet causes and start clamoring on about how offended they are, how insufferable those who question their delusions are, how everyone on earth has to cater to them and never speak ill of anything they want, are no better than blacks insisting they’re equal and they built the pyramids or invented the refrigerator. Either people cleave to the truth or wrap themselves up in a lie that becomes the basis of their self-worth, and rise or fall on the basis of how many people are forced to acknowledge this lie. The problem with this is, for every person who gets the glowy satisfaction of having some self-satisfying lie told to him or her, there is another person humiliated and killed inside for having to speak a lie.
Solzhenitsyn lived through the gulag archipelago and came out the other side with this fundamental lesson: Live not by lies.
The cold could not break a person, starvation could not break a person, sleeplessness could not break a person, but once you could get them to tell a lie, they were lost. From there on, they could take no pride in themselves, they could not stand up for anything, they knew in their hearts they would buckle next time too. There is nothing more harmful to the human heart than knowing something is a lie, but having to say it’s true. And yet every day people heedlessly, selfishly, callously, demand dozens of lies be told about them, about their group, about their pet cause, to soothe their ego. Unthinkingly, these soul harvesters go around humiliating and defiling everyone they meet, demanding no one notice the Emperor Has No Clothes. You don’t deserve such tribute, no one does. No one deserves to be told lies just so they can feel good. Requiring others to lie about you, or your group, or your pet cause, is a slavery deeper than any whip or collar. It is enslaving even the inner conscience of man. It is making a man acknowledge he is a dog, which no amount of treating someone like a dog could do!
The Soviet Union was largely an all-white nation, but it was still hell on earth. Why? Because everyone was forced to mouth lies. You could not even speak your heart amidst friends or family. Any of them could be spies, informers, traitors. You could never, ever know. The furnace of your true mind and feelings circulated round and round your soul like a pressurised volcano, but it could never come forth! It could never be expressed! You could never be yourself! Exist! Live!
Ayn Rand aptly described the Soviet Union in We the Living: “In a totalitarian world, you can either kill yourself, kill your mind, or leave.” Enduring the hell of lies is impossible. One or another part of you is lost forever. Nor was she grandstanding, look at Russia today! The majority of children are aborted, alcoholism has taken the men to third world life expectancy, despair and depopulation hangs over people like the ghost of christmas past. What horrible tragedy must occur to make people kill their babies, kill themselves, kill their mental faculties with alcohol and drugs, abandon all hope and all wish to live? Simple–communism required people to say nothing but lies for the last 70 years. God help such a nation! God help such a soul!
So no, we can not accept ’some’ lies for the sake of civility, or machiavellan policy, or any other excuse. Life without truth is worthless. Never ask that of anyone.
February 3rd, 2009
‘There is not a truth existing that I fear or would wish unknown to the whole world.’ — Thomas Jefferson.
There are two types of people on earth. Those willing to accept the verdict of truth, regardless of how it reflects on them personally, or their pet causes, or how uncomfortable it might be; and those who don’t.
If you adopt only those truths which suit you, while denying those truths which you find distasteful, like some sort of chinese menu, you are a coward, a hypocrite, and a cur.
Race realism has a wonderful purpose. Its purpose is to shatter people’s illusions and force people to accept the truth through continuous presenting of evidence, science, genetics, history, geography, the news, whatever reveals the essence of racial differences that so invalidate the fantasy world of equalitarians. But race realism does not exist to serve whites, it exists to serve truth. If Jews are found to be smarter than whites, then race realism requires we accept that. If East Asians are found to be less criminal, have fewer illegitimate children, or a lower divorce rate, race realism requires we accept that. If blacks have bigger dicks and can sprint fast, race realism requires we accept that.
Race realism is a tiny subset of the truth that exists about this world. There is plenty of truth out there. Evolution is real, religion is false, gender matters, homosexuals are mentally ill, HIV causes AIDS, the free market is the best generator of wealth, democracy is fundamentally flawed, divorce causes lasting harm to kids, and star trek sucks compared to star wars.
People who wrap themselves in their pet causes and start clamoring on about how offended they are, how insufferable those who question their delusions are, how everyone on earth has to cater to them and never speak ill of anything they want, are no better than blacks insisting they’re equal and they built the pyramids or invented the refrigerator. Either people cleave to the truth or wrap themselves up in a lie that becomes the basis of their self-worth, and rise or fall on the basis of how many people are forced to acknowledge this lie. The problem with this is, for every person who gets the glowy satisfaction of having some self-satisfying lie told to him or her, there is another person humiliated and killed inside for having to speak a lie.
Solzhenitsyn lived through the gulag archipelago and came out the other side with this fundamental lesson: Live not by lies.
The cold could not break a person, starvation could not break a person, sleeplessness could not break a person, but once you could get them to tell a lie, they were lost. From there on, they could take no pride in themselves, they could not stand up for anything, they knew in their hearts they would buckle next time too. There is nothing more harmful to the human heart than knowing something is a lie, but having to say it’s true. And yet every day people heedlessly, selfishly, callously, demand dozens of lies be told about them, about their group, about their pet cause, to soothe their ego. Unthinkingly, these soul harvesters go around humiliating and defiling everyone they meet, demanding no one notice the Emperor Has No Clothes. You don’t deserve such tribute, no one does. No one deserves to be told lies just so they can feel good. Requiring others to lie about you, or your group, or your pet cause, is a slavery deeper than any whip or collar. It is enslaving even the inner conscience of man. It is making a man acknowledge he is a dog, which no amount of treating someone like a dog could do!
The Soviet Union was largely an all-white nation, but it was still hell on earth. Why? Because everyone was forced to mouth lies. You could not even speak your heart amidst friends or family. Any of them could be spies, informers, traitors. You could never, ever know. The furnace of your true mind and feelings circulated round and round your soul like a pressurised volcano, but it could never come forth! It could never be expressed! You could never be yourself! Exist! Live!
Ayn Rand aptly described the Soviet Union in We the Living: “In a totalitarian world, you can either kill yourself, kill your mind, or leave.” Enduring the hell of lies is impossible. One or another part of you is lost forever. Nor was she grandstanding, look at Russia today! The majority of children are aborted, alcoholism has taken the men to third world life expectancy, despair and depopulation hangs over people like the ghost of christmas past. What horrible tragedy must occur to make people kill their babies, kill themselves, kill their mental faculties with alcohol and drugs, abandon all hope and all wish to live? Simple–communism required people to say nothing but lies for the last 70 years. God help such a nation! God help such a soul!
So no, we can not accept ’some’ lies for the sake of civility, or machiavellan policy, or any other excuse. Life without truth is worthless. Never ask that of anyone.
Superior vs. Inferior
Superior vs. Inferior
February 8th, 2009(Disclaimer: This post is poetic and metaphorical, the truth is figurative not literal, and all the stronger therefore, I hope, for those with eyes to see.)
In the great chain of being, there is a scale of value starting from empty space all the way up to God. The relationships between these objects is one of inferiority and superiority. It is right that the superior supplant the inferior, but wrong for the inferior to supplant the superior. The other model, that everything and everyone is equal, is the great evil that stalks our world. As a rebellion against God’s naturally ordained order, God’s great chain of being, it is best labeled as Satan. It’s followers, Satanists.
Here is a rough example of the Great Chain of Being (a belief that the healthy Europe of the past universally held) Vacuum <>level all distinction by equating himself to something he was not. Everyone else who attempts to disturb the natural order of God’s hierarchy is following in Satan’s footsteps. Environmentalists who claim trees or animals deserve the same rights as humans. Liberals who ‘deconstruct’ heroes and ridicule holiness or virtue, trying to drag great men onto the same level as mediocrity, liberals who make excuses for losers, praise them as somehow great, or shift the blame on everyone else so that their loser-hood is somehow to our blame and their credit, liberals who deny there is such a thing as Good and Evil, Right and Wrong, Virtuous and Vicious, Admirable and Despicable, Beautiful and Ugly, True and False — the one thing connecting all their views, the one common pattern behind all their beliefs (environmentalism, subjectivism, relativism, feminism, GBLT, anti-racism, victimology, communism) is the wish to level all distinctions, to negate all measurements, to annihilate value itself so that people can stay equal — ie so that the great chain of being can become all mixed together into a giant ball of chaos, disorder, and devolution. Their goal is captured in this poem:
The Second Coming (Yeats):
“TURNING and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.”
They are Satanic, their wish is pure evil. Never before has an army’s battlecry been: “Let God be unseated by his Angels, let Saints storm heaven’s door, let Humans desecrate their saints, let Animals devour mankind, let Plants poison the animals, let plague wither all plants, let vacuum tear apart the rocks!” But this is the goal of liberalism, what else can it be? If nothing is true, if there is no such thing as inferior or superior beings, if we are all equal, if no judgments can ever be made about anything, if there is no objective scale of value we can test things by, what else but the utter rejection of existence? For instance, if nothing and no one is better or worse, then why strive to become anything? Whether you are rich or poor, honest or dishonest, clean or filthy, productive or parasitic, there will be some liberal telling you it’s okay, that you’re just as good as anyone else, that it doesn’t matter because in your heart, you’re special just like everyone else. In this world the worse you become the greater your rewards. The better you become, the harsher the penalties. This is Satan’s dream come true, the good is bad, the bad is good, and everything is mixed up together. People are terrified of the most rudimentary judgments, classifications, or preferences. And yet, just a hundred years ago, ‘discrimination’ was praised as a virtue. It meant you had good taste, that you could tell between refined and vulgar, good and bad.
The battlecry of the army of righteousness is simple: “Let the superior supplant the inferior, let the inferior never supplant the superior!” I want vacuum to become rocks, I want rocks to become plants, I want plants to become animals, I want animals to become humans, I want humans to become saints, I want saints to become angels, and I want angels to become God. This upward aspiration, this uplifting, updwelling beatitude of life’s progress has gone on for billions of years. It has been the holy hymn of the universe, of all inanimate matter and all living things, up to this day. It has been the yearning of every last atom to combine with some other and become a little larger, a little more complex, a little more alive, a little more awake. And up until this moment, it has been the desire of every last human to perfect themselves, to become civilized, to train their minds, to learn from and emulate their heroes and saints, to purify their spirits, to enlarge their horizons, to evolve their faculties–this ever upward, promethian spirit that started when the first three quarks got together and continues every time a newborn is brought mewling into this world, clad in infinite potential, unscarred by all the previous trials and tribulations of time.
Superior people are defined by their virtues. They are brilliant, beautiful, courageous, honorable, honest, kind, just, and faithful. People like this are better than the stupid, ugly, cowardly, shiftless, lying, cruel, thieving and treacherous. They don’t deserve equal treatment, equal reproductive success, equal quality of life, equal admiration, equal rights, or equal anything else. They deserve to be supplanted by the better people, to be driven off, to be destroyed, to be replaced with a cleansing flame that devours the den of inequity their presence stained God’s green earth with. The last thing they ever deserve, the last and worst thing they could ever receive, is our land, our women, our tribute or our servitude. It is the reversal of all that is right and good, the overturning of God’s natural order, the breaking of the great chain of being, the carrying off of Satan’s coup.
We fight for the very existence of Good in this world. The Satanists wish to define it away, and thus leave us with only evil. Only the suffering, only the wretchedness, only the falsehoods, lies, corruption, decay, vulgarity, degeneracy and ruin that our lessers will visit upon us. It all begins with the recognition of superior and inferior, of better and worse. It ends when we as a group choose the better over the worse, the true over the false, the beautiful over the ugly, the good over the bad, to inherit the cosmos.
Some Suggestions on Style:
Some Suggestions on Style:
February 12th, 2009There are good and bad reasons for the same goal. If a good reason is given to further an ideal, it will be welcomed or at least sympathized with. If a bad reason is given for that same ideal, it will not only be rejected, but the listener will become deaf to all other reasons for that same ideal, good and bad, disenchanted by the original bad one that looms over all the others.
Here’s a series of good and bad arguments for the same thing. Presentation is everything.
“Genes matter because the world is locked in a darwinian struggle where victory is defined by whoever passes on the most genes into the future. We should treat people correspondingly well or poorly based on their relative genetic relatedness to ourselves, in the hopes that cooperating with those like us will give us and them an edge over the competition–everyone else on earth.”
Bad. This is an amoral view that doesn’t believe in anything higher than ‘nature, red in tooth and claw.’ We’re humans, not bacteria, and we need to act like humans. Universal standards are the only fair ones, a perpetual war of all against all is fundamentally unappealing.
“Genes matter because our entire essence is coded into our DNA. Our intelligence, personality, behavior, productivity, health, beauty, everything is rooted in our genes. After all, no one is arguing that a giraffe if raised correctly could become a human, and yet the only remaining difference between giraffes and humans are genes. Once we accept how fundamental genes are to our inner nature, how our entire life is just a manifestation of our genome, just like a flower will carry the scent, colors, and shape its genes coded for at birth, we will see how connected good genes are to good people, and good people to the Good. Anyone who supports the Good will want good people and thus good genes, it’s inescapably vital.”
Good. It connects to higher ends, with universal and absolutist appeals. It is non-threatening and optimistic, instead of pessimistic. It shows what you’re for (good genes that make good people that make the Good), instead of what you’re against (anyone who endangers the propagation of your genome or competes for market share with your genes, be they good or bad).
“Because genes matter, it is important we keep our countries as genetically related as possible. Since everyone is simply working for the betterment of their genes, including alien genomes will only cause friction within a society working at cross-purposes. If they were to become the majority, their pursuit of their genome’s interests will become predatory and discriminatory against us, eventually to our annihilation. Before then, we must drive them out, sterilize them, annihilate them–whatever it takes.”
Bad. People aren’t just working for the betterment of their genes, many people are working for their ideals, and anyone who shares those ideals can benefit from the presence of each other. Sometimes it is to the advantage of both genomes to mix, or to simply work together living side by side, if for instance both have valuable traits the other lacks and people would love for their children to be or have access to in their daily life. And it is a major turn-off to solicit a real, present-day violence or suffering on a mass of people simply to prevent a hypothetical, far-future violence or suffering on a mass of people.
“Because genes matter, our country should be populated by people with good genes. Because the likelihood of good genes varies between the races, this will in practice mean a drastic skewing away from races with bad genes and towards races with good genes, though outstanding individuals of any sort are always welcome. We are confident a country full of beautiful, brilliant, honest, kind, courageous, and virtuous people will be a blessing to each other in daily life, and to the whole world in our products of mind and effort. This dream cannot be sacrificed to the greed or need of other groups who seek to be included in something they do not contribute to. Our children deserve a life of safety, prosperity, respect and pride — something they cannot be given when the teeming billions of the dysfunctional peoples of the world have equal access to our citizenship and nationhood.”
Good. It first delineates the good things that we are hoping for, and then shows how necessary anti-immigration policies are to protecting them. It is nothing against the immigrants or foreigners, it is just what we have to do out of love for our own. It also leaves murky how this goal will be achieved, which gives a great deal of room for compromise and peaceful solutions which, if not ideal and quick, are realistic and unoffending.
“Historically, whites have been the best people on earth. The Confederacy was full of proud, honorable aristocrats and soldiers who loved freedom. Nazi Germany was a model for all future whites to follow. Colonialism was awesome, especially the colonies in Brazil and the Caribbeans that shipped millions of blacks off to work until they died in the disease-infested tropical heat of our cash crops. Segregation in the South and Apartheid in South Africa is the height of wisdom and fairness, the Crusades were just trying to take back our own land, and honestly, I can’t think of a single time whites have ever been in the wrong, about anything, anywhere.”
Bad. Do not even discuss these issues if you can, but if you have to, don’t make excuses or apologies for dubious behavior. The more you defend them, the more their taint rubs off on you. Simply say things should have been done better but there’s nothing you can do about the past, we are worried about the future. Point out that all groups have pasts full of dubious behavior and no one else has to constantly apologize or make amends for the actions of their ancestors.
“Historically, whites have been the best people on earth. We are an amazing race possessing some of the greatest talents that have ever lived. We are the nation of Shakespeare, Goethe, Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, Newton, Rembrandt, Titian, Monet, Euler, Euclid, Homer, Plato, Aristotle, Michelangelo, Tolstoy, Dostoeveskey, and a thousand more. We have split the atom and journeyed to the moon, and brought about the most important material gains in man’s history using our meta-invention, the scientific method. We invented the steam engine, the car, the textile industry, mass-manufacturing, the airplane, the refrigerator, the television and the computer. We feed the world, we’ve brought peace to the world — (fewer people die by violence today than at any other time in human history), we’ve cured so many diseases of the world, we entertain the world and we enlighten the world. There could never be the billions upon billions of non-whites in the world, all at a higher standard of life than they’ve ever imagined before, if not for our economics, technology, medicine, charity, and good govenmental policies we’ve encouraged everywhere. And it is not just what we’ve done for others, but what wonderful lives we lead amongst ourselves, that fills me with admiration. We are a free people, who can say what we like, servile and beholden to none. Our women are loved and respected, we do not mistreat them, demean them, cover them up, or rape them like so many others do. We are slow to anger and quick to forgive, we trust others and do not stick to clannish rivalries that serve no one. We are honest, hard-working–I’d like to believe the most honest and hard working people in the world–but not so uptight we can’t enjoy wine, sex, and song. We take care of our poor but do not deny people the opportunity to get rich through their talent, effort, and good ideas. Just looking at the love and joy in a white family at a park or on a hike, how unafraid and verbose our children are because nobody has punished or oppressed or hurt them, how loving the looks exchanged between the mother and father, swells my heart with how wonderful it is that whites live on this green earth.”
Good. Who can argue that Tchaikovsky and Raphael were evil? Who can condemn us for flying to the moon? Who can resent us for not raping our women in prowling street gangs who think it’s a good sport to fill their otherwise empty days? With all of world history to pick and choose from, with all the qualities whites have shown in the present and across time, why not champion the most indisputable, the most refreshing, the most gentle and happy ones? Why not love them, and ask others to love them too, and through them, us, who stand with them and are their seed? Maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t, but it leaves a clean feeling in your heart, instead of arguing about justifications for the Nazis and the slave-trade–it’s like looking at a line of freshly-snowed in peaks and knowing you’ve been at the top of them all. It let’s your soul soar instead of stoop, and that needs to be our goal.
The Fruits of Nationalism: Prosperity, Security, Autonomy, and Dignity
The Fruits of Nationalism: Prosperity, Security, Autonomy, and Dignity
February 13th, 2009A political party must do one thing to achieve power: Find out what people want, then give it to them.
First we must ask ourselves what people want. What they really, truly want. I think it can be pretty well categorized into four different things: Prosperity, Security, Autonomy, and Dignity. How is government going to deliver these things to the people? If we don’t, some other political party will promise to do so, and the electorate will favor them in a landslide.
Prosperity needn’t be extravagant. It means having a place of your own, with clean water, electricity, sewage, air conditioning/heating, good food, good health, a wife, at least two kids, a pet, a car, nice clothes, nice furniture, and a ready source of entertainment. When people complain about money, it’s usually because they can’t afford one of these things. If it’s because they can’t afford something else, it’s no longer under the category of ‘prosperity’ and more leaning toward ‘vanity,’ ‘pleasure-seeking,’ or ‘to look respectable’ (which we’ll get to under Dignity.) A nationalist party is unique in not favoring the rich or the poor, it offers prosperity for all. My favorite idea is the ‘Flat Plan.’ A flat tax combined with a flat citizen’s dividend which redistributes this money could satisfy everyone’s wishes at once. The rich are not taxed so heavily that they cannot make money, nor are the poor left high and dry concerning the most basic essentials. Due to the ‘everyone gets the same money equally’ flat rate, however, bad behavior like single motherhood, drug use, or anything else does not get rewarded with extra government handouts. Furthermore, no group can vote itself especially more handouts at the expense of any other group, eliminating the robber-baron nature of majority rules democracy. This also keeps bureaucracy low and jobs in the private sphere because the government solely hands out money, not goods or services, and it has no need of oversight on how the money is spent or distributed because that is left in the hands of the people. Pork barrel projects and corporate lobbying is impossible under this system, because no one can get any special benefits for themselves. It is the combination of socialism and libertarianism in one — it’s nationalism.
Security is self explanatory. People want their life and their property to be protected. No one should be a victim of crime, or of government rapaciousness or corruption. You should be able to live out your entire life without anyone hurting you or anyone you know. ((If it’s hard to believe trust me, this is what it was like in the past! Small towns could go for 100 years without a murder, all the doors were left open and neighbors could go freely between the houses chatting without a fear, kids played in the streets and no one worried about where they were because they were safe everywhere they went.)) There is also a deeper sense to the word, which is having a secure place in your community. People want to belong, and to be accepted by others, and security means having somewhere to go where you belong and are accepted. A job that you won’t lose, a church or social group that sticks together, a marriage that will not break up, a belief system you can ascribe to comfortably your whole life without it being challenged or assaulted. People long for this security just as much as the security of peace or low crime, but there is very little of this present in the world today. Offering security on all fronts is one of the most appealing aspects of a nationalist party. We take no shift from criminals and make no excuses for minorities. The great thing about nationalists is you know we’re serious when we say we’ll keep the streets safe, crack down on crime and corruption, or anything of the like. Because we are not afraid of facing reality. Furthermore, nationalists wish to preserve the prevailing culture, norms, and workforce. The most direct way we secure these benefits for our people is preventing immigration from changing the face of your neighborhoods or towns underneath you, another thing nationalists do is preserve domestic industry and jobs from off-sourcing and the buffets of globalism by looking to the interests of our own people first. It used to be you could work at the same job for 40 years and then retire on a handsome pension and take care of your entire family on a decent wage. By reducing immigration which drives up the labor force and drives down wages, and using protective tariffs against foreign cheap-labor competition abroad, those days can be restored. As for protecting the family, it will be more difficult, perhaps impossible, if the spirit of the people are no longer willing. But a nationalist party would do everything it could in the schools and in the culture to support families, to respect families, to encourage child-birth, and to make it affordable to start and have a family. The citizen’s dividend is a major portion of this, so are low taxes, and a secure job.
Autonomy means being left alone to make your life decisions for yourself. People don’t want to be controlled or policed or spied on at all times of their life. People want to make their own choices, control their own purchases, wear what they like, say what they like, love whom they please, worship whom they please, and determine their own destiny. The best thing about the Flat Plan is it does not conflict with people’s autonomy even though it gives everyone prosperity and security. This is a balancing act and only the nationalists can pull it off. Nationalists can offer people true autonomy because Political Correctness, the nanny state, debt, crushing poverty, high taxes, crime that keeps you locked inside your houses, and all the rest that robs people of their freedom and choices will be gone. The citizen’s dividend gives everyone the freedom to pursue their dreams without becoming beholden to bankers; free speech, the right to bear arms, freedom of religion, and all the rest gives people the rest of their autonomy. The reason nationalism can offer these freedoms where no one else can, is because we aren’t afraid of offending anyone. We don’t have any internal divisions that need to be coddled or protected. We are one nation, one people, and we’re not afraid of each other, offended by each other, or out to get each other. In such a climate, everyone can act freely and breathe the free air of their ‘blood and soil.’ In a multiculture you live in a giant prison camp. Simply being yourself, not harming anyone, can get you fired, thrown in jail, ostracized, divorced, or bankrupt. Your every interaction with everyone falls under some bizarre contraption of affirmative action, civil rights laws, hate speech codes, and all the rest. Around women you must worry about sexual harassment lawsuits, around non-whites discrimination lawsuits, and crime is so high you can never just walk around town or let your kids go out and play.
Last, people desire to have a sense of dignity. They want to feel dignified and worth something inside themselves, and they want others to treat them with respect, to value them, to treat them like human beings, deserving of dignity and some base level of courtesy and kindness. People’s dignity is fragile and almost intangible, but it’s worth every bit as much as prosperity, security, or autonomy. There are plenty of people who if hypothetically offered all the other good things in life if only they gave up their dignity and, say, sucked someone’s dick once in their life – would say no, not on your life. What is it they are protecting? What is it they want more than anything else? It’s their dignity. And perhaps it is our dignity that has been most assaulted by the multicult. We are told day in and day out by the media, by commercials, by our schools, by our politicians, our books, even our preachers that we are evil, that we are scum, that our ancestors were villains, that we should apologize for everything and take the blame for everything anyone suffered anywhere on earth. We are forced by the multicult to continuously mouth lies, or at best hold our tongues as other people speak lies all around us that we cannot afford to dispute socially or economically. It’s humiliating, it’s destructive to the soul, to our internal pride and dignity. There is a vision of what a human being should be like, that he shouldn’t have to bow or scrape to anyone, that he’s as good as the next guy, that he should never have to eat shit, apologize for wrongs he didn’t do, lie, or accept the abuse of others without retaliatory self-defense. Nationalists, yet again, can offer people their dignity back. For women, there will no longer be non-whites pawing, raping, ogling you, or calling you ‘whores.’ Non-whites treat women atrociously and white women especially bad, because they know we are not allowed to defend you and you are made to feel guilty and ‘racist’ if you defend yourselves. Men need no longer serve under affirmative-action bosses, watch commercials where white males bumble around as their much cooler black coworkers do everything right, read slanted news coverage of our politics, or any of the rest. We will have a government that respects us and relies on us, instead of demeans, insults, and enslaves us to their pet ‘diversity’ they wish to ‘equalize’ today. Under a nationalist party, everyone belongs and is a respected and valued member of society, because you’re a member of our nation. When you look at the flag, that flag stands for you. No one else on earth. For you and yours. And that’s who we are working for, not the global village, not the poor or unfortunate, for the nation. A sense of self worth and human decency and proud upbearing in your step can’t be directly given to you, but our way of life can help, and most of all it doesn’t actively seek to undermine and destroy it in those who would naturally have it, always, like a second skin. Nationalists do not hate confident, self-assured, noble people. It honors them and asks for their help in the great work of furthering our people’s greatness. It does not forget its heroes or its benefactors, it does not denigrate its wives and mothers. It teaches children to love themselves and their history and their destiny in the movies and the schools, instead of hate it all. If you’re rich or poor, old or young, boy or girl, even smart or dumb, so long as you’re of good character you will keep your dignity. That’s what a nation does for each other, and that’s how nationalists roll.
So we have our task: find out what people want, then give it to them. If people do want prosperity, security, autonomy, and dignity like I suspect, show them how nationalism can give that to them. If people don’t want it, ask them what they really do want and let’s see if we can deliver that too. Best of all, nationalism doesn’t pose a direct threat to anyone, even to minorities. If they keep their noses clean and mind their own business, we can mind our own business and treat them like everyone else. Their presence will not stop us from gifting our people with the goods they need, the dominant culture will be transformed, and the way of life will favor enough people that we’ll always have the votes to prevail, minorities or no.
Happy Valentine’s Day!
Happy Valentine’s Day!
February 14th, 2009
“My Soft Sea.”
Cradled against your breast,
my head upon the softest, sweetest sea.
Lulled by rising and falling breath,
listening to the heart–beating for me.
“The Song of Life.”
There are songs of day, and of night,
lark and robin, thrush and owl.
So many songs, in so many throats,
all crying, wishing, pining, wooing.
All songs pleading the tiniest of things:
to me, my love. to me. to me.
Life’s calling upon all life:
to me. to me. to me
“A Mountain Stream.”
The trees filtered sunlight upon a mountain stream,
finding two lovers, clad in spray and gleam.
They sparkled, and glistened, and shone,
like two suns of their very own.
–by Diamed. It’d be fun if commentors added in their own love poems. Here’s your chance to be read by the world. :).
Democracy Has Failed
Democracy Has Failed
February 23rd, 2009Democracy finds its roots in ancient Greece, where Athenians and others were allowed to vote for their political views. Aristotle wrote about Democracy in his work, Politics. He said it worked for small groups for small periods of time, but would always eventually degenerate into a mobocracy. He didn’t think very highly of other governmental systems either, though. All aristocracies would eventually degenerate into oligarchies, and all monarchies were destined to become tyrannies. Or as Kant would say: “From the crooked timber of humanity, nothing ever did grow smooth.”
Montesquieu in his seminal work The Spirit of the Laws discusses the same problems. That democracies seem to thrive when there are high pitches of civic virtue, a 3 Musketeersian ‘one for all, and all for one’ that pervades the streets and animates the discussions of people who sit around the cooler. He thought it might be best for small nations but showed little sign of success in large ones.
Churchill later summed up history’s thinking on the subject with his bon mot: “Democracy is the worst form of government on earth, except for all the others.”
The strength of democracy is hard to counter. Most of the democratic world is wealthy, free, technologically and scientifically advanced, has a long lifespan, and peaceful. For hundreds of years democratic nations have thrived while dictatorships caused disastrous wars or committed atrocities against their own people. Even the dictatorships of the world sought to cloak themselves in the legitimacy of democracy. The ‘People’s Republic of China,’ the “Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.” And the endless fake elections pre-arranged to yield near 100% unanimous support for the endlessly elected dictators of Africa, South America, and the Middle East. Now we seem to be nearing the age where the whole world will become democratic, or even join a global democracy erasing all states on earth.
And yet, how can we view an institution that has so universally betrayed its own people, so swiftly destroyed the work of eons, as current-day democracy? How is it that a scientist who just cured cancer is only given one vote on the direction of his country, right alongside the 18 year old high schooler who’s never done a thing in his life, the felon just released from jail, the illiterate retard who can’t tie his own shoes, the follower of fashion magazines who votes based solely on how ‘hot’ the politician looks, and all the other human drivel that washes up on our national shores? It is handing over the keys of the asylum to the inmates, to allow any schmoe to set public policy. No one takes a vote on how to fix a plumbing or electric problem, we hire the expert who knows what needs to be done, and pay them to do it. In fact, common sense reigns in every other field of thought. Doctors do not treat patients based on a massive vote of the electorate on what they think the doctor should do to help, they simply use their knowledge and expertise and do it themselves. And yet when our country need fixing, when our country needs treating, we immediately resort to a vote to figure out what should be done. What just happened? No one would trust their life to a vote under the doctor’s knife, and yet we all willingly hand over our country and the fate of our children to the exact same process.
It is not even true that in a democracy, bumbling morons control the levers of power. If only! This basic error of democracy is compounded when special interests peddle their influence to gain votes from said bumbling morons. Money buys politicians, because it takes money to run a campaign and advertise to people to vote for ‘x’. Whoever pays the piper, calls the tune. Having a good idea or a brilliant plan that would improve the lives of everyone in the country is not the path to political power in a democracy. Winning votes is the path to power, and the easiest way to do that is to continuously saturate people with media and commercials talking about how great you are. It doesn’t need substance, only style, and the masses drink it up. Most voters have no idea what positions our politicians hold or what plans they have to help the nation. They simply go into the voting booth having heard and read lots of good ‘vibes’ about their candidate and turn the lever. When the media plays kingmaker by saturating the news coverage with a slanted favorable coverage of one side and unfavorable of the other, it becomes nearly impossible to gain traction with the masses.
The worst mistake of democracy was expanding it beyond its intended borders. Democracy was always meant to work for a small, publically spirited, nation of biologically related, culturally related, linguistically related, folk. So long as everyone was related, it was doubtful one group would wish the enslavement or destruction of another, or that one group would routinely underperform the other and become a burden on their neighbors, or that there would be irreconcilable differences between the differing political parties. The moment democracy metastizised to include such basically different groups as Flemings and Walloons, Quebecois and Anglos, or Luo and Kikyou, we created a new democratic curse — tribalism and the unified voting of a tribe to gain wealth, power, and prestige from the competing tribes. 98% of blacks voted for Obama, not because they just so happened to think he was the best qualified candidate, but because they felt he would support his fellow blacks once in power. This kind of democracy devolves to a tribal head-count, or two wolves and a sheep voting over what’s for dinner. Three wolves or three sheep can vote on that matter rather fairly — a mixed-species democracy cannot.
It gets worse. Once diversity has begun in a democracy, it becomes an unstoppable force that gains momentum every election. Why? Because inevitably, one party will seek power by peddling to new immigrants. In this case democracy has completely reversed itself, as the government seeks to abolish the people and elect a new one. If they can’t get enough votes from the current electorate, why adjust their platform or become better people? It’s easier to just find some tribe out in the world that would vote for you if you let them immigrate into your country, and voila the natives no longer matter or have any say in their own government’s policies. Only by restricting the vote to one unified nation can this kind of coup be stopped–once your country is a ‘nation of immigrants’ anyone and everyone can quickly be deciding the best use of YOUR money, YOUR land and YOUR children. In the past transportation was not sufficiently advanced to simply parachute in a hundred million bantus to win the next election for your country, but now this is a simple and easy technique ‘democracy’ can rely on to gain or keep power.
Never have people been less free than under South African democracy. Crime is higher than a war-zone, the courts do not catch criminals and do not protect innocents brought up on bogus charges. The government openly loots the treasury, while all the tax dollars collected come from the hopelessly outnumbered whites to be splurged on the hopelessly helpless blacks. The borders aren’t controlled, Black Economic Empowerment means no amount of schooling, intelligence, enterprise, dedication, or virtue will let qualified people get the job, disease completely cripples the country while the Presidents make ridiculous statements like HIV doesn’t cause AIDS or taking a shower after sex prevents the catching of AIDS. Fetal alcohol syndrome, alcoholism, drunk driving, black magic body harvesting rituals, and the rape of tens of thousands of babies are just more unique gems South Africa showers down upon its denizens. And yet people are still allowed to vote in free and fair elections for whatever party they like. What does it matter? The outcome is determined ahead of time, by the very nature of democracy: The influence of money, the stupidity of the masses, the diversity of the country, the lack of civic virtue or public-mindedness, the lies of the media, the use of immigration as a weapon, the ease of acquiring unearned wealth and power through government-enforced redistribution, on and on. Not a thousand or ten thousand elections will ever elect the proper ruler for South Africa, or a proper political platform for that country, one that could actually heal the nation and help its people. Another source of legitimacy, another selection process is needed, for South Africa and the ailing democracies of the entire world.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)