Wonders of the Modern World:

Recently, some society or other released a new 7 wonders of the world.

Their choices can be found here: http://www.new7wonders.com/n7w/world

Out of the 7, there is only 1 European wonder of the world, the Colosseum. Latin America got a full 3 wonders of the world, it's apparently the cultural center of humanity and our greatest legacy on Earth.

I'm not satisfied with these results. I think they suck.

Instead I think I'll offer my own 7 wonders of the world. First, in a strict architectural sense:

1. Eiffel Tower.

















2. Hagia Sophia.






















3. Sistine Chapel.



















4. Parthenon.


















5. Pyramids of Egypt.




















6. Taj Mahal.

















7. Kremlin.























But we must recall that all buildings are built not just to look pretty, but with some function in mind. Due to this, all great buildings have some utilitarian role in mind, they aren't just to be looked at. The churches, temples, tombs, and world's fair proof-of-principle concepts listed above were all designed with a function that meant a great deal to the people of their era. The modern world is different. We don't have enough faith anymore to build a new cathedral or mosque to match the old ones. So it is important to ask ourselves, what structures we Are building in the modern age, that are of enormous scale, but funded anyway due to some function we find desirable. When you look at it through this lens, we can find a lot of more interesting targets for the title, 'modern wonder of the world.'

1. The US Flag on the Moon.
2. The International Space Station.
3. The map of the human genome.
4. The Large Hadron Collider.
5. Dolly the Sheep.
6. The nuclear submarine.
7. The World Wide Web.

I don't list either the first list, or the second list, in any particular order. I think they are all incredible achievements. I am perfectly willing to believe that I'm missing a few items, and should replace a few items listed. It doesn't matter. This is a good barometer of the true wonders of the world, and is accurate enough to make my point.

I think these are our most 'wonderful', hands down 'splashy' achievements not because they might be the most useful invention (like say, antibiotics, or transistors, or silicon chips), but because they evoke the same ancient spirit of creating magnificent, overawing landmarks and breakthroughs. The fact that man once walked on the moon, and the small little flag that dots the lunar landscape to prove it, has to be our proudest achievement in that vein. But the decades long project to create a continuously manned, scientifically useful, and comfortably, safely, cheaply habitable space station is also great stuff. The ISS constantly growing and morphing these last decades, moving steadily towards completion, using the united space programs of the entire civilized world, is a wonderful and splashy sight.

The fact that we can now clone life forms and take reproduction into our own hands is a signature breakthrough with huge potential across many fields, and the humble little sheep named Dolly will always go down in history as its representative. After billions of dollars and decades of work, our computers have finally given us a complete map of the human genome. Not only is this simply an enormous landmark of data over the most interesting topic in the universe, but it opens up the possibilities for genetic engineering and the discovery of how genes relate to intelligence, personality, disease, mental illness, sexual preference, and behavior. That endless string of letters is the answer to the questions that have dogged our philosophers and theologians for thousands of years.

The overlaying of virtual and physical reality into a new, parallel, e-world is something no one even imagined in the past. People are just as likely to interact online as in real life, digital content from music to movies is easily downloadable, shopping can be done at home, businesses can stay in touch with their workers and their products, and information previously unheard of or known only to a few scholars is available to everyone on earth for free. The world wide web has made us redefine reality, romance, communication and commerce, and continues to shape each generation's lives in new and unexpected ways.

The nuclear submarine encompasses an impressive display of independent technologies, and is the ultimate weapon in humanity's arsenal. With a nuclear power engine, it stealthily floats miles beneath the sea, using a specially constructed metal skin that can resist both water pressure and detection from above. Deep in its vaults lies the nuclear missle, combining a rocket that can send payloads into space and a nuclear weapon that can annihilate whole cities. Such a creation is on the level of ancient gods, it's hard to believe Thor or Zeus would stand any chance against it. A submarine can survive virtually any disaster, natural or man-made, and can stay underwater for months. The owner of a nuclear submarine, just one, is stronger than the majority of nations on Earth.

Deep beneath the mountains of Switzerland lies our newest microscope, the Large Hadron Collider. Using billions of dollars, endless vats of computers, magnets, cooling agents, miles of underwater tunnel, and thousands of highly trained scientists, we accelerate particles to near light speed and smash them together with unimaginable accuracy, just in hopes of seeing something we haven't seen before. As proof that man will go to any length to satisfy his curiosity, and having the real potential to finally make sense of the laws of physics that define our universe, the LHC cannot be rivaled in importance by anything else in science. The sheer scale of the project, the tininess of the subject they are studying, and the foundational aspect of what its discoveries mean for both the origin and destiny of the universe, makes the LHC as splashy as it gets.

Without political correctness' intervention, the architectural beauty of the world is centered in Europe. It contains 5 of the 7 wonders of the world. Both the pyramids and the taj mahal were built by Caucasians, which under a wider net would give us 7/7 wonders of the world.

Given that man's genius has always sought some function to its endeavors, rather than buildings for the sake of mere frippery, and given that religion has taken a back step to science in the modern age, it stands to reason that we should look at giant scientific works of the modern world as our new 'wonders.' From that viewpoint, whites have built 7/7 of the new wonders of the world as well.

So after looking at these lists, you have to come to a new conclusion: The greatest wonder of the ancient and the modern world, is the white race who built all the others.

Problems Only WN Can Solve:

Why do I keep saying America will fall and only white nationalism can possibly emerge in its wake? Do I have a crystal ball? Am I just indulging in fantasy?

No, and no. What I have is the force of history and the intelligence and knowledge to interpret the historical signs I see in front of me.

First, no diverse empire has ever held together in history. Eventually it always fractures along ethnic lines. The Soviet Union, Czechoslovakia, and Yugoslavia are all recent examples of this. But in truth for centuries now we have seen examples of this -- When the European empires fell, hundreds of ethnic nations emerged in their wake. Some, like Hungary, in Europe. Some, like Iraq, emerging from the Ottomans. Some, like Venezuela, splitting off from 'Grande Colombia.' Some splitting from South Africa and becoming Swaziland. You see, it's everywhere. History has been utterly merciless to diversity for centuries now. As late as 1960, America was still 90% white. It was stable for centuries because it was not, in fact, diverse. Only in the 1980's did Mexican immigration pick up speed enough to start creating a truly diverse America. That has set the clock ticking -- no country has ever survived diversity, we have been in the midst of diversity for 30 years now. It's just a question of time. The stress builds every day. White flight proves whites are unwilling to live around non-whites, at any price. Eventually America will run out of places to flee, and whites will be forced to turn and fight for a land of their own instead. Current white attitudes, and a history of thousands of years, shows America is no more magical than any other section of mankind -- just like everyone else, we can't abide diversity. We want to live around people like ourselves. And like everyone else, we will eventually resort to civil war to secure this right.

The answer to diversity is a white ethno-state, set up in a sparsely populated but large landmass of the United States, the northwestern states and Alaska. Only white nationalism is offering people this solution. No other solution is viable. There is no other way to escape diversity. Therefore when the problem of diversity reaches a flash point, no one will seek out communism, libertarianism, christianity, or any other creed. They will see none of them have any solutions to their problem, and they will seek out white nationalism instead.

Second, the debt is approaching the level of a failed state. Once the majority of a country's GDP is spent on interest on its debt, it has become a failed state. It will either be seized by its creditors, or collapse in revolution, as the government fails to provide any services to its people while collecting massive taxes. This has also happened multiple times in history. Britain seized Egypt in the 1800's because its entire GDP was simply servicing interest on the debt to Britain. When Egypt threatened to not pay back its debt, Britain conquered Egypt and kept the interest payments coming. America's debt is impossible to pay back. It is now at 130 trillion. The interest on the debt is approaching 50% of all government spending. Once the baby boomers retire and start collecting social security and medicare, we are doomed. The extra benefits programs of Bush's prescription drugs, and now Obama's national health service, will only exacerbate the problem. The onerous provisions of cap and trade will bankrupt America that much sooner. Our endless wars overseas are only exacerbating our debt. Just like the Soviet Union collapsed from Afghanistan, Afghanistan is going to bankrupt and collapse America too. Neither republicans nor democrats have shown any ability to control deficit spending or eliminate debt. It will continue to rise, it cannot be paid off, and interest on the debt will reach such unpayable levels that a taxpayer revolt will follow.

White Nationalism has an easy answer to our debt problems. If we are a new nation, we don't owe a dime to anyone. We have nothing to do with the USA's debt, as we are no longer a part of the USA. A white separatist state would leave behind the decayed husk of the USA, which would still exist on paper, and would still be responsible for all of its debt and the people who have to answer to all of their creditors. We won't be. We will start with a new currency and a new budget, at a complete 0. A new beginning, total debt forgiveness for everyone, a clean slate. Considering how many people are in debt to their ears just to pay for necessities in America like housing, transportation, and education, total debt forgiveness to all the vampires who gave out these loans is a selling point only WN will offer. Come to our state and start over, this time with a citizen's dividend to help pay your way through life. That is the only answer. The old USA is bankrupt and can't do anything anymore about its headlong plummet into insolvency.

Third, modern employment is a shell game. Most people are not in fact in productive employment, they are pretending they are doing something and collecting pay checks from those they con -- either from tax payers, or from fools who buy their useless products and services because of a sufficiently persuasive advertisement. America is determined to exist for the sake of the super rich, who set public policy. They will continue to allow millions of unskilled immigrants into the country even with 20% unemployment rates. They will continue to take advantage of gullible and stupid people with all sorts of insurance, lawyers, debt, and luxury spending scams. Credit cards have interest rates at like 50%. This is just usury. Public bureaucrats who ostensibly were hired to take care of the poor, pocket all of the money for themselves and only take care of themselves. Teachers fail to teach their students the most basic abilities in math, reading, and writing. Kids are going to college incapable of converting fractions to decimals.

We are facing a dual problem, a giant employed workforce that do nothing but leech off of the productive, and a giant unemployed workforce that can't even do that. The answer isn't to get everyone back to work. There isn't enough work to do that. The answer is a new paradigm where work is not the center of life. First, we must stop immigration so that what work there is, is available to our citizens. Second, we must pay a citizen's dividend so that people without work can still live and raise children in our community. We should return to jobs based on manufacturing, extraction of natural resources, and high tech gadgets our geniuses can provide the outside world. As we will have high standards for our citizenry, and use eugenics from there to improve them, we will quickly have the best scientists and universities on Earth. Converting that into businesses that provide money is not that difficult. Imagine our experts going around building fusion power plants for China. That's a very large market, that only White Nationalism will achieve, because we are the only people on earth serious about creating genius (eugenics) educating genius (IQ tracking and schools for the gifted, not the remedial, put first), and employing genius (giving them the money they need to spend on science experiments of their choice). In America, some woeful amount of GDP is spent on research and development. Something less than 5%. All of it goes down the sink of maintenance costs, like medicare. By lowering our maintenance costs and honoring a more frugal living (and abolishing all parasitism that diverts our economy down sewer holes), we can save more money and sink it into science. By investing more in science, we can become the leaders of the world in technology. By becoming the leaders, we can create whole new markets that will both employ and enrich our citizenry.

Fourth, nihilism and hedonism have seized our youth culture and it is hurting them, and those around them, in incalculable ways. Anyone you ask, if offered a choice between being dumped, or beaten up, would choose being beaten up. But assault is banned and dumping is fine. Anyone on earth who was given a choice between losing their wallet, and losing their wife, would choose their wallet. But stealing is banned and divorce is fine. Anyone on earth who was given a choice between their house being burned down, and becoming addicted to a deadly chemical which warps their whole life around mindless highs and lows until they die, would choose for their houses to burn down. But arson is banned and drugs are fine. Anyone on earth would prefer to be groped or called a lecherous name, than their kid die in a drunk driving accident (whether it was their kid or the other driver.) And yet sexual harassment is banned and alcohol is legal.

In our bizarro world, the things that hurt us most, are all legal, and we have no legal recourse to avenge ourselves upon our victimizers. Whereas the things that hurt us least -- well, it's not like they are rigorously persecuted either. Crime gets almost as large a free pass as immorality in the new improved America. America has no intention of stopping this descent. Crime will rise in direct correlation to the demographics of our minorities. Feminism will continue to entrench itself, and hedonism will continue to spread, so long as broken homes perpetuate a vicious cycle into worse and worse behavior each generation. There is nothing communism, libertarianism, liberals, or Christianity can do to stop these trends, because none of them are willing to pass any law against them.

White nationalism is different. It grants that if a government is going to take away your right to redress your grievances, then it must redress your grievances itself. If we are not allowed to kill women who cheat on us, then the government must punish them, and prevent them from committing adultery, in the first place. If we are not allowed to seek out and kill anyone who hurts our family, the government must seek out and kill them first. If we are not allowed to enforce oaths like "till death do us part," then the government must enforce those oaths for us, by banning divorce in all but exceptional cases. If we are not allowed to protect our children by limiting their access to mental sewage, drug dealers, sluts, alcohol, and so on -- then the government must be willing to do so for us. The current US government requires all the children of America run a gauntlet of STD's, miscegenation, pre-marital sex, drugs, alcohol, cigarettes, depression, suicide, and crime before they hit 25. A parent of a single child, after investing his entire life into that child's happiness, must sit back and watch helplessly to see what will become of him, now that he is outside the parent's protection. More often than not, the result is horrible, and breaks their heart. Who speaks for them? Who offers any solace to them? Just as horrible though is a parent with five kids, who has to run the gauntlet five times, each time wondering if this is the loved one who society will corrupt, betray, and kill before he even had a chance to live. We need a government that addresses a parent's fears and a child's rights to grow up in an environment that's at least attempting to give them a good life. Attempting to provide a happy path for them to follow. Our commercials, our media, our stories, do nothing but celebrate vice and degeneracy. But the people who actually practice these creeds are not happy and vivacious like the stories show. They are depressed, suicidal, poor, diseased, despised, and ashamed of themselves. Nothing good comes from it. They are sold a bill of goods, conned. They are victims of a fraud perpetrated by their society. It said drug use, alcohol, cigarettes, free love, divorce, adultery, sodomy, and all the rest were the path to happiness and liberation, when in fact they are just a path to hell and an early death, making everyone else miserable around you as you go.

Eventually society will become so degenerate it will no longer be able to raise a functioning member of society. When the entire next generation of kids become homeless nymphomaniac druggees, society will no longer stand. At that point only a pure ethnostate that starts over from first principles, that unapologetically stamps out vice and sin, can save a state from economic and violent dissolution.

Fifth, the birth rates of the modern west are unsustainable. Any culture that fails to have 2.1 children per generation is doomed to eventual extinction. Whites in America are something like 1.7. Smarter whites have an even lower birth rate. Obviously, if your population keeps halving, and halving, and halving, each generation, eventually it disappears entirely. Given the state of marriage, the state of the economy, the state of our morals, there is no way people will spontaneously start having more kids. They can't afford them, and they are too selfish to have them or raise them. Many people have a genuine fear that even having children in this age is child abuse. If they have no hope that a white born today could have a good life in a majority-minority USA, they will simply not have kids as a mercy to them.

Libertarianism, communism, christianity, none of these people can solve the fertility rate, because none of them are willing to lay down a simple law. You MUST marry by age 20 and have 2 kids by age 25. That simple. White nationalism will do so, and in doing so, secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. That is the most essential law in the entire law code. More important even than immigration control. It is the absolute pillar of the new white ethno-state. Without it, all we have is ashes, old age, and death. Alongside this law, will be help provided by the government to make sure it is possible to follow it. The citizen's dividend, which can pay for a family of 4 even without any other job. Apprenticeships for children leaving school, so they have a real chance at a skilled job they enjoy. Moral education in the schools, so people get used to their duty and do not find it particularly harsh or onerous. And laws that forbid adultery and divorce, that help keep families together. And a military and police force willing to make sure no one can harm the children you do have.

Given that America is plunging into nihilist hedonism, unpayable debt, intolerable diversity, below replacement birth rates, and economic disaster, the question isn't why America would fail. The real question is how can anyone imagine it will survive? It is fated to fall. History demands it falls. The only way for it not to fall, at this point, would be technological inventions so dramatic they simply sweep the board of all preexisting conditions and start civilization over on a new level. Technology does not have much time left to do this. The collapse will be within 30-50 years. All of the problems listed above have no answer from the usual suspects. In fact, they are the people who created these problems in the first place. The biggest problem is they fail to recognize them as problems. The second largest is none of them have the guts to pass a law against them. If you don't have the guts to pass a law, you cannot solve any problem. If individuals could solve their own problems, they wouldn't exist in the first place. It's obvious, by the very existence of our problems, that individuals CANNOT solve them alone, that government IS needed to find solutions to them. Even so, libertarians, liberals, conservatives, all harp endlessly on how individuals, freedom, and the free market will find solutions to all of our problems. If they could have found a solution, they would have by now. All across the world fertility is extinction level for the white race. Every single government has responded by saying individuals will work it out themselves. Every single country continues to reproduce at extinction levels. What larger experiment is necessary to prove my point? Will they need the extra data of the next 30 years? Do any of them think fertility will turn around in that time? With mass immigration flooding all the available jobs and unemployment at 20%? Yeah, good luck with that.

Ahh! I forgot dysgenics eventually lowering intelligence to the point that a modern technological society can no longer be maintained, another dagger to the heart of contemporary America. Another problem only WN can solve. I'd also point out a variety of environmental crisis coming our way, from global warming to water loss to topsoil loss, but I am not sure how bad they will really be. I will just point out it is possible environmental crisis will also add to America's woes, and that WN would rely on sustainability as a matter of course. Simply by switching to nuclear power and banning immigration, we would become the most green government on earth.

In any event, the point is this. America's problems are too large for anything to save our country, short of a miracle. All the other parties have no solutions to our problems. People in the midst of this collapse will continue to suffer, no matter how many parties and movements they turn to. Their continued suffering will make them continue searching and changing in the hopes of finding a solution. By default, everyone who turns to nationalism will stop searching or changing, because it is the right answer. This sorting process will result in everyone eventually, by random chance, evolving into white nationalists. At this point we will take power and solve all the problems on Earth. It is simply a syllogism. How can it not be this way? If we are right about the coming problems facing the earth, the problems only we talk about and everyone else refuses to believe even exist, much less need solutions, we will be the only group that can solve them. The only group people can turn to when the crisis arrives. Nationalism is therefore fated to be victorious, or was unnecessary all along, in which case it's better that we're not victorious. Either way we win. IF no crisis arrives and everything is magically perfect, then there was no need for nationalism and we can all just enjoy our peaceful and productive lives. If a crisis does arrive just like we predicted, then people will turn to us for their solutions and we will provide them, for our own lives and theirs, creating a utopia where we can all be happy again. I can't ask for more from either eventuality. The future is bright.

Communism < Conservatism < Liberalism < Islam < Nationalism.

I think this is an important topic, because it is my basis for all my optimism. Communism fell because it was unsustainable. It fell without even a bullet fired. It fell when people realized that there was a gap between their ideology and their reality. The gap could no longer be papered over by lies, it was simply too vast for anyone to not see it anymore. It could no longer be bullied or murdered into submission, because even the soldiers were going hungry, dying in Afghanistan, and ashamed of themselves. There were simply no pillars left for the state to continue, and so it ended. It ended suddenly, without warning, and without a shot fired. There was a collective last gasp of Soviet Man, and it simply died of old age.

The Soviet Union was less capable of long term survival than America is, as far as tyrannies go. For one thing, the rulers of Russia were Russians. This made it very hard for them to be cruel, to be inhuman, towards their own people. Somewhere in their hearts they still loved Mother Russia, and could not bring themselves to the same cruelties that the Georgian Stalin and his jewish comissaars did in the 1930's. America is firmly in the grip of minority rule. The 'slicer' coalition of jews at the top, and their low IQ legions at the bottom, have been dictating our discourse, what can and cannot be said, what can and cannot be thought, for decades. Our minority government is willing to do anything to us. Their open borders policy is genocide, they know it, and they revel in it. They feel nothing for us. Nothing but hatred and the desire to genocide us as quickly as they can. In comparison, Russia's rulers were saints.

Second, the Soviet Union did not have, for the most part, true believers among the populace. The United States does, and in ridiculously high numbers. Communism was not a religion, it was an economic model that promised to deliver people material wealth. This was a very bad system to base a tyranny on, because if it can't deliver the wealth, people have no reason to be loyal to the ideology. Islam is much better. It delivers all its goodies in paradise, after you are dead. There is no way to verify whether Islam is true or not. Therefore it can rule for eternity, and the people subject to it can think they are in fact happy and blessed to live under tyranny, penury, and brutality all their lives. I would say multiculturalism is somewhere in between. This is because the promise of multiculturalism is a spiritual good, that is delivered in the present.

The promise of multiculturalism is that blissful moment when you hold hands and sing kumbayah with people of all types, overcoming all differences for a spiritual union in the embrace of the brotherhood of man. It never has to actually happen in real life, simply imagining it is good enough for most liberals. Liberals who live in all white neighborhoods, who attend all white schools, who go to an all white church, and only marry other whites, still get the spiritual goods of the kumbayah song, rumbling throughout their lives in the back of their heads. "I am one of the good people, the chosen people, the blessed liberal who overcame hate and embraced love." There is no real way to quantify the 'good' that multiculturalism provides for these people. Feeling good about yourself, and gaining the approval of all your peers for evincing the right opinions about multiculturalism, is basically priceless. Even if the whole country is falling apart and the liberals are starving to death in basements hiding from machete wielding blacks, they will be thinking to themselves, "I am one of the good people, the people who embraced love, not hate. If only all those haters hadn't made the blacks so disadvantaged, if only we could have given them more, if only they had been raised differently, none of this would have happened. At least I'll die knowing I wasn't one of those awful racists. I will forgive the very blacks who come to slit my throat, and try one last time to hug them, to show them that really I was one of the good ones, the liberals, who embraced love."

This religious ecstasy will be the highlight of their lives. The more they suffer for diversity, for 'love,' for the brotherhood of man, the more elevated and spiritual and joyous they become. There is no point, no amount of destruction, that could convince them to change their minds. Then their life would have been in vain, and they wouldn't be the elect, the chosen, the blessed, the 'lovers.' They'd rather die than become a 'hater,' it is the new taboo, the unclean, the desecration. You can snort cocaine and have endless sex of all types with all people, and you are still pure. But if you think a nasty thought against a non-white group, you are defiled forever. Religious feeling does not go away simply because a religion has been discredited. Humans evolved to be religious. For one reason, it gave them a healthy respect for the unseen -- like germs and disease. For another, it helped promote order and cooperation between groups, which gave the obedient, the faithful, the meek, an edge over more fractious and infighting barbarians. There might also be further advantages, it might be a consolation for the suffering, a relief to the lonely, a strength to the warrior who would otherwise flee, there's so many benefits faith can provide the weak. Who wouldn't want an all-powerful, or at least very powerful, God on their side? Who wouldn't perform better, at any task, if an All-Knowing God were watching and would judge you in the afterlife? We are stuck with faith.

Liberals have chosen their faith. It is very difficult to convert people from their faith. Communism was not a faith -- liberalism, multiculturalism, is. But unlike Islam, it is a faith that can be shaken by reality. Because many of these liberals will find that, despite themselves, they really do hate the non-whites. That, after enough contact with them, it really has become too much. That they really do want out. That, after all, maybe there really is a limit to how much they can stomach. There are also the people who thought they were liberals, simply because no one had ever told them otherwise, but the moment they are forced to stop and think about it -- by being mugged by a black, or forced into bankruptcy, or divorced, or hurt by some socially approved group -- they suddenly realize they were never liberals to begin with. As non-whites hurt whites more and more often, these people will be the first to realize what a croc the whole thing is.

Liberalism also made the mistake of basing its creed on verifiable facts. It is very difficult to have faith in something when you know it isn't true. Liberalism's required fact, the foolish weakness it left in its armor, is that all people are essentially equal. That the only differences between men and women, whites and blacks, are superficial and bodily. That every single brain is a blank slate, of infinite potential. Just as communism was eventually rebutted by the fact that everyone was still poor, egalitarianism will eventually be rebutted by irrefutable scientific evidence that people are not equal and can never become equal, no matter what you do. This will occur when we find the gene(s) for intelligence. It is inevitable. The gene for intelligence is basically the same as when St. Paul said, "If Christ is not risen, there is no faith." If there is a gene for intelligence, there is no faith. That's it. It simply falls to dust forever. Certainly it is possible to doublethink, to somehow embrace a contradiction, to soldier on despite the nagging doubts in your head, but it's like a deer running after an arrow has already pierced its heart. All the hunter needs do is follow it a few hundred yards and let it die.

Liberalism will not outlive the generation that discovers the intelligence gene. It will die with them. What faith will then replace anti-racism? Like a pendulum's swing, it will of course BE racism. It will be a faith built on blood, nature, evolution, destiny. People will realize they are all born with a wyrd, a doom, a pre-existing identity, and that they are part of a vast sea of genes that are all them, that the race is all in it together. It will be the religion of the race-soul. The acknowledgment of human differences, followed by an exploration of what it means to be a member of your group, followed by an enlightened adherence to the 'type' you learn you represent. The Platonic Ideal of Whiteness will become the hero in our literature, the person our genes are telling us to be, to become, to grow into. And our faith will be judging ourselves, and others, on how closely we approach these ideals. It is clear to me what the ideals of the white race soul are, and what the platonic white man is -- a vessel of truth, beauty, and love. That is our race soul, that is our new religion. That is our staff to lean on, and our afterlife to look upon, our purpose to fulfill, our reason for being, our all in all. It is everything religion ever provided, and reality cannot break it because finally, for once, it is reality.

Our new taboos, our new desecrations, would be treason to the race. Would be acting in a manner not becoming to our race. Dishonor and disloyalty will be the two charges everyone trembles under and fears. The two charges they will do anything to avoid. And two charges we will, with righteous indignation, enforce to the hilt, just like liberalism currently legislates its morality in hate crime laws, anti-discrimination laws, etc. You can tell what morality is prevalent by what is illegal. Don't bother with the libertarian crap about how everything should be legal. Every age has its religious taboos, has some behavior banned that makes no sense, except from a religious point of view. It can be eating pork, or cows. It can be wearing magic underwear, or hats. But the law is deadly serious about it all the same. White Nationalism will be deadly serious about our laws too. You can tell a serious person from a non-serious, by his willingness to enforce his values with deadly, and righteous, justice. If his convictions have not yet reached that point, you can dismiss him as a non-entity. Anyone who won't show up for the fight doesn't matter. He will simply obey those who do. Liberals are in deadly earnest, there are thousands of people currently in jail all across Europe for questioning their creed. The communists weren't. In the end, they couldn't shoot on their own people anymore. Liberals can. Muslims can. And serious white nationalists can too.

Our myths like 'the day of the rope,' are not going anywhere. They show we are deadly serious about enforcing our values on our people, on tabooing the taboo. That is the sign of a healthy, and powerful, religion. A community that will not rot or change with the tides of fashion, because too many people are still willing to kill and die to defend it. You have to admire Islam -- after 1400 years there are still suicide bombers and assassins killing and dying to enforce their taboos. Do not badmouth the Prophet, do not become a loose woman, etc. Communism was a total lightweight. It lasted 70 years. Liberalism is probably somewhere in between. It has a higher inner strength than communism, (or libertarianism for that matter. Who has ever been a martyr for cutting government spending?) but much less than Islam, and much less than nationalism. Nationalism mobilized all the nations of Europe and made them bleed each other in the tens of millions. I don't mean dragging civilians by the hair and shooting them in the back of the head -- communism can kill helpless people in large batches. But communism couldn't save the USSR from the Wehrmacht, they were simply surrendering across the entire front. Stalin had to appeal to the people's patriotism, he had to stoop and call his people 'brothers' over the radio. In fact, it is still called the Great Patriotic War over there. Likewise, patriotism is what drove the Nazis to fight against overwhelming odds on all fronts, throughout the entire war. They were always outnumbered, outgunned, and surrounded. It didn't matter, they were nationalists, and nationalism is strong. The people answer to its call. Wave a flag and sing a national anthem, and the effect is electric. Tears spring into people's eyes. Our faith is incredibly powerful. Liberals recognize this, that is why they spend 24/7 denouncing us, and no other opposition. That is why they fight us day and night, not their deracinated Republican foes, not the aracial color blind libertarians, no one but us. They are terrified of us. Specifically, the anti-semites. Why? Because we are the only serious people. The only determined people. Anti-semites are the people who withstand the test of character. They know it is impossible for any threats to emerge from a group too cowardly to even name the jew, or tell the honest truth, or proclaim their real beliefs for the world to see. How can I identify the 'serious' white nationalists? Just look at our two stories of revolution. One is by Pierce, the other by Covington. The only two authors who wrote glowingly about a race war to save the white race, were both anti-semites. If philo-semites were serious, they would have just as bloody a story of their own, only, it wouldn't involve any antisemitism. You would expect scenes of massive slaughter and carnage, of heroes breaking all moral taboos and creating their own law wherever they went, of selfless sacrifice for the race no matter what the price -- where are their stories? Nowhere. Only anti-semites write serious pro-white literature about a serious pro-white future. The philo-semites, simply by having no vision of the future, having not even a fantasy of victory, can instantly be identified as the already defeated. The already crushed in spirit. They won't show up at the muster. They'll be muttering about having too many 'bad elements,' and 'being too socialist,' and 'making us look bad,' even after the bullets start to fly. They are the crushed in spirit and they will sit on the sidelines the whole war long. They are cowards. I'd be fine with jews in my country, so long as they apologized for what they as a group have done in the past, marry whites, and their kids marry whites, and their kids marry whites, (and so on), and adopt the same faith as the rest of us -- clinging to no shred of separate identity the moment they take on citizenship. They will either be wholly a member of the community, or not in our community at all. Assimilate or leave.

We don't need jews. If they won't abide by our terms, fuck them. There are six times as many intelligent whites as intelligent jews, in America alone. We did just fine without them before they arrived in the late 1800's, and we'll do just fine after they're gone. We don't need you. We don't need your approval. We don't need your help. We don't need you. If you want to join, fine. But it will be on our terms, and in service to us. Not you, not your tribe.

The same goes for any other assimilable minority. If you bring something to the table, if you're a swell guy, fine. But you will marry a white, and your children will marry whites, and their children will marry whites, and so on. And you will abandon your identity at the door. You will be an honorary aryan and go by nothing else. Your loyalty will be to the white race and no one else. If you don't love us, if your heart doesn't swell with pride when you read the constitution, or look at our statues, or salute our flag -- then leave. Assimilate or leave. Don't create a space in the culture for you, don't make us include you, don't try to widen our horizons or broaden our exclusiveness. Fit in or leave. Even advocacy that our nation 'should really be more about x' or 'should really include more y's' would be treason and you'd be gone or strung up on the nearest lamp post, depending on our mood. We don't need you. You're here because a white person loves you, and you love a white person. That was your ticket in, that was the good faith we saw in you. If that good faith was simply a pretense, then so is our tolerance. Our forbearance is also a pretense, liable to snap at the first hint that something has gone wrong. If you aren't confident that you belong here, don't come.

Why jump through all these hoops instead of just ban non-whites outright? Because part of the white race soul is objectivity and fairness. If they really, truly, objectively, are more qualified than a white, and more loyal to whites than a white, if they are closer to the platonic ideal of the white race soul than a white is, it would be a betrayal of our nature to turn them away. And a white homeland needs to first and foremost abide by our inner nature, or the cognitive dissonance will a) stillbirth the nation as it does not appeal to the European race soul as worthy to fight for. b) create cognitive dissonance in our populace as we read all the sob stories of people discriminated against for no good reason, even if the nation were to succeed, and the stress of this cognitive dissonance would rot us from within. It would make people less loyal, and more doubtful, over who is really in the right, and who is the moral side.

That is a moral high ground we cannot leave to our opponents. We cannot leave any morality to our opponents. ALL morality, ALL of it, will belong to us. We will have an absolute monopoly on the entire heart of the white race. If there is some part of whites we are not serving, then we have failed them. As a reflection of the white race soul, we must accept the white race's verdicts -- and one of them is fairness, objectivity, merit -- to set up standards, and judge people as individuals, not ahead of time, not summarily, not as a group.

This does not mean we can't have standards. We can have extremely high standards, standards that invalidate 99.9999% of all nonwhites and jews. So long as they are applied fairly and evenly, so long as there is a standard that can conceivably be met, whites will feel reassured that we are in the right and have the moral high ground. Citizenship being earned through love of country and adherence to its laws does not strike people as unfair. People being turned away, families being broken up, patriots who supported us from the beginning being less qualified than illiterate hillbillies -- that will break us, not them. Liberals would just love that. They'd focus all their cameras on it. It would be our undoing. That is not a moral high ground I am willing to cede.

Communism is the weakest belief system, it lasted the shortest time, because it couldn't deliver on very simple promises and was exposed for a fraud immediately. Conservatism used to be strong, but now that Christianity has been exposed as absurd, with no divine retribution, no miracles, no cures outside of modern medicine, no reward for being Christian, with the origin of the universe and life and intelligence being explained by science, the religion is dead and the rats are leaving the ship. Likewise, all that nonsense about small government, liberty, low taxes, and so on is anemic and pathetic. It hasn't had any power since the articles of confederation and it's never coming back. People Want a strong government. They Want a society that looks after them and protects them. They Want to be part of something bigger than themselves. The only people who argued for liberty were just liars who were really fighting for race. Whether it was the Confederacy, the State's Rights movement opposed to desegregation, or the tax cutters who want to give less welfare to minorities, it is always just a veiled position on race. Racism Lite can never compete with principled, determined Racism. It can't even compete with liberalism. The sooner it dies the better.

Liberalism is strong for now, but it is built on a foundation of sand -- the scientific belief in the equality of mankind. Once that is dis-proven, it will be in the exact same situation that Christianity finds itself in today. The old people will cling to it, the young will mock it and discard it for good. All of society will be searching desperately for a new direction, this time founded on the truth.

Islam carries with it a poison pill -- its lack of innovation means it will always be scientifically, and thus militarily and economically, weak. Anyone with brains and courage can smash it in direct conflict. Islam has relied on the cowardice of its opponents, whose principles were not strong enough or coherent enough to stop their extremely principled and extremely focused goal of world conquest. It will break on the rocks of white nationalism. We are smarter, we are more ruthless, we are more innovative, we are more flexible, we are everything they can never be. If Islam attempted to fuck with a white nationalist Europe-Russia-America axis, God help them.

And so we arrive at nationalism. Looking at the European elections, we're around 10% of the populace already. In the past, we had total power. Science cannot discredit our claims because we are right. Our countries can't collapse because countries only collapse due to diversity. We cannot lose a war because nationalism creates the greatest warriors of all. Our economy can't collapse because we are devoted to science, genius, and equity. Our fertility can't collapse because we will require marriage and children. Our morals won't collapse because we will use censorship, education, and law to train our people onto another path. Our genome won't collapse because we will employ eugenics. Our government won't collapse because our nobility will enforce an unchanging constitution. Nationalism has no weaknesses, it only falls to an even more powerful nationalism. That's what sunk the Germans in World War I and World War II. If not for the same nationalist fervor in the hearts of their Russian, British, French, and American foes, they would have conquered the world. Nationalists DID conquer the world. Only after the European powers had conquered the whole world, did they fall to bickering amongst each other for the spoils. The most foolish, greedy, short sighted wars ever fought. But nevertheless, proof positive that nationalism is the strongest system on earth. All attempts to replace it will fail. Meanwhile, all other system's failures will be replaced by nationalism. It happened last time society was in disorder, it will happen again. It can't happen any other way.

Because the Beauty of the White Aryan Woman Must Not Perish From the Earth:

There's a great thread on Stormfront, http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?p=6911744.

They say a picture is worth a thousand words. So maybe a thousand pictures is worth a million words. A million reasons why the white race must live. Some of these girls are famous, some aren't. The point is, they're extremely beautiful, and if their genes are mixed with any other race, that beauty will be lost forever. The genes for these faces, these eyes, this hair, are all recessive. If mixed in with non-whites, they'll never appear again. The beauty of the white race is too high a price to pay for 'diversity,', 'enrichment,' 'vibrancy,' ethnic foods, 'tolerance,' or whatever the code word for genocide is today.

It isn't asking much to have a homeland where we can protect the beauty of our race, no more and no less than what we grant every last red-spottled peckingbird and northwest blue-tipped moth. The UN predicts whites will be only 2% of world population by the end of the century. Not a single country on Earth is reserved for us, a place we can call our own. They must all be shared. We must become the minority in every single one. Every other people gets their own homeland, where their unique genome is preserved, but we are required to give away every single one of ours. This is genocide, it is intentional, and there is nothing 'fair' or 'loving' about it.

These women don't need to be 'enriched.' They are fine as is. What they need to be is protected. If we aren't willing to fight for this, we aren't willing to fight for anything:

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* See also:  https://diamed-the-road-less-traveled.blogspot.com/2009/11/wonders-of-modern-world.html