Blog Archive

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Blacks Aren’t Human

Blacks Aren’t Human
January 29th, 2009

According to Rushton’s “Race, Evolution, and Behavior” fully modern homo sapiens emerged in Africa 200,000 years ago. 100,000 years ago, a small group of Africans had a sudden urge to head north. This small group inhabited the rest of the world, with minimal contact with the rest of the Africans who stayed in Africa. 40,000 years ago, the Caucasoid race broke off from the Mongoloid race.

This means the entire world outside of Africa is largely related, descended from one small tribe of perhaps a few hundred or a thousand. This tribe was obviously already unique, in that it alone had the intrepidity and determination to head north and conquer the world. We, the descendants of this unique tribe, have afterwards been evolving under extremely different, more challenging environments for the last 100,000 years apart from the African race we left behind. 100,000 years under dramatically different environments from a dramatically different founding stock is a long time. Compare it to dogs:

“Dog history has been studied recently using mitochondrial DNA, which suggests that wolves and dogs split into different species around 100,000 years ago;

Another recent study suggests that the entire population of dogs today are descended from three females near China about 15,000 years ago

So, I’m going to stick my neck out and use the 13,000 year BC date as the probable date of domestication.”

This is a convenient parallel. Dogs also come from a bottleneck, they’ve also been genetically separate from wolves for 100,000 years, and they’ve also undergone different environmental pressures than their wolf counterparts. Just as the northern latitudes presented a unique environment for non-blacks to grow up in, dogs were domesticated and evolved towards suiting human needs instead of wolf needs. No one on earth says dogs and wolves are the same species, even though it is possible for dogs to mate with wolves and have fertile offspring. The genetic differences are vast enough, the phenotypic differences in looks, behavior, and personality are great enough, that everyone instinctively recognizes dogs and wolves are different species now.

Why then are blacks considered human? Why are blacks and non-blacks considered part of the same species? We could not look more different, act more different, or have more different personalities than them. There is a vast genetic divergence between blacks and non-blacks dating back 100,000 years. And even though blacks and non-blacks can have fertile offspring, biologically that has never been used as the exclusive standard for whether you belong to the same species or not.

Phenotypic Variations between Blacks and Non-blacks:

Blacks have wide noses, kinky hair, black skin, high waist-to-hip ratios, prognathic jaws, long arms, and soulless, vacant eyes. Everything about them is ugly.

Blacks have the lowest IQ in the world. (ignoring the equally disgusting and black-skinned australian aborigines for convenience’s sake.) The bushmen clock in at around 50 IQ, the average bantu achieves the mentally retarded level of 70 IQ, and the highly cultivated, well fed, well cared for, partially white African-Americans reach 85 IQ. IQ has an enormous impact on lifestyle, achievement, and behavior. IQ correlates to poverty, crime, mortality, and broken homes on one side — and education, wealth, human accomplishment, long life and stable homes on the other. According to “IQ and the Wealth of Nations,” a country must have a minimum average IQ of 90 to run a technological civilization. It is not a far cry to say it is IQ that makes humans better than the animals, and it is IQ that makes some humans better than other humans.

That’s not all though. Blacks are unique in that when we arrived, they had no written language, no wheel, no architectural works, nothing at all that would indicate they live a human existence. Whereas literature and palaces and cities existed in almost every corner of the earth, from the Incas to the Indians to the Persians to the Chinese to Stonehenge to Ankar Wat in Cambodia — nothing existed in Africa. For the past 100,000 years non-blacks have been spreading across the globe, building pyramids and cities, developing new technology, domesticating animals and crops, covering themselves in finely decorated clothing, and living essentially human lives. Blacks, meanwhile, stayed nearly naked, self-mutilating, technology-less, with no domesticated animals, no written language, no wheel, no stone buildings, no metalworking, nothing.

Virtually every other non-black group came up with an admirable or at least interesting religion or philosophy which was recorded and taught to a priesthood. Indians had the Vedas and the Upanishads, Chinese had Confucianism, Daoism, and various sects of Buddhism. Europeans had Virgil, Horace, and Homer to write down their pagan religion, with Plato, Aristotle, and numberless other greats to record their philosophy. Even the Aztecs had a corpus of literature which was, unfortunately, burnt and destroyed by the Spanish invaders. Shintoism was developed in Japan, the epic of Gilgamesh was recorded in ancient Babylonian times, and Egypt authored the Book of the Dead. Only black Africa (and assorted primitives in australasia) hadn’t recorded or created any official religion or philosophy. Blacks still rely on voodoo, witchcraft, black magic, and animism with no particular pantheon of Gods, no priesthood, no anything that could develop them past superstition and barbarism.

Today it is questionable what Blacks could achieve on their own, without the intervention of others giving to them all the things they could never produce or maintain themselves. Though we see blacks walking around in business suits, speaking English, shooting guns, and making use of all sorts of non-black generated goods and services and inventions and ideas and discoveries — none of them originate from the black man. Without the continuous intervention of charity into Black Africa, it’s unknown whether they could even maintain what they have, or if they would simply regress back to mud huts the moment we left. All current black civilization is in fact transplanted non-black civilization. There is not as yet a single black civilization on Earth that has independently developed and maintained its own technological and philosophical way of life. No blacks have won any nobel prizes in the hard sciences, fields medals, or gotten any spot on a list of Human Accomplishment that would represent some major scientific or technological advancement for the world.

Geography can be no excuse, because blacks today live all across the world. Blacks in France, the UK, and the USA are given preferential treatment and access to college educations, and yet they still produce nothing. At the same time, whites who lived in South Africa and Zimbabwe made them into decent, first world nations without a problem. There is nothing about the African continent inimical to modern life, it is simply the fact that it is populated by blacks.

Nor can some strange combination of bad luck and being separate from other civilizations explain black underperformance. After all, blacks have been connected to the outside world since the 1400’s. They have had centuries to modernize and improve themselves in Africa with full access to modern knowledge and technology. In contrast, it took Japan about twenty years to modernize from a feudal samurai culture to a fully modern industrial state which then took on and defeated Russia in 1900. Blacks have had centuries in the USA to do all sorts of human activities, immersed in white culture, knowledge, and technology. Instead all they do is riot, rape, steal, sell drugs, and demand more handouts from the government. Germany recovered from WWII in just ten years, becoming yet again a prosperous, powerful, and leading-edge modern civilization. Africans meanwhile cannot recover from ‘colonization,’ ’slavery,’ or ‘discrimination’ after centuries. Haiti has been an all-black, independent, free state since the Napoleonic wars, 200 years ago. Even so, its lifestyle and standard of living perfectly matches that of darkest Africa. In those 200 years it hasn’t progressed an inch. In fact it has probably regressed since that time. Their neighbors in the dominican republic have immensely better statistics than them in all fields. Instead of a failed state, the dominican republic takes care of its people, has a working government, and doesn’t need charity. The difference? Their population is non-black. All of the old, tired excuses are refuted by geography and history.

The black murder rate is 9 times that of the white/hispanic (combined!) murder rate. It is 36 times as high as the asian murder rate. Blacks are the majority of AIDS cases and all other STDs, their STD rates are completely out of proportion to all other groups. Even homosexuals have a hard time keeping up with the black STD rates. No ordinary healthy human has the sexual habits of the black race. Whereas every other people on earth developed a family structure, blacks still roam around aimlessly screwing everyone they meet and never staying to raise the child. 70% of black children in the USA are illegitimate. In Africa, women largely do all the work and raise the kids while the men commit crime or sit around chewing leaves or smoking something. Domestic violence among blacks is atrocious. Rape is endemic. The human race does not act like this, their morals and habits are completely different.

Good things can be said of virtually every group or civilization on earth. This is unsurprising, given the fact that everyone on earth is descended from the same small tribe that left africa 100,000 years ago. East Asians are such decent, advanced people they are comparable to whites. Unsurprisingly, they only diverged from the White race 40,000 years ago. There is only one group nothing good can be said about, there is only one group completely unrelated to the rest of the human race, and that is the black African. There is enough genetic variation between blacks and non-blacks that any objective scientist, classifying us like they would classify various animal species, would label us different species. On one side humans, on the other blacks. There is enough phenotypic, common sense variation, that again it is an insult to categorize blacks among the human race. They are nothing like us and they never will be, they are worse in every way. Call them orcs, or trolls, devils, or whatever you like–they are not human.

* * *

(P.S.  In response to various opposing views, I wrote a few follow up posts addressing specific issues they didn't seem to understand from the initial post.  Here are the appropriate links to follow-up on this conversation:, ,,,,,


«Oldest   ‹Older   601 – 636 of 636
JeffnDenmark said...

Anywhere on earth... the lighter the skin the better the living conditions, the darker the skin the worse the living conditions.
Facts are facts and the truth is racists.
That's why the libtard commies hate the truth. They prefer political correctness, and Cultural Marxist bullshit.

King Yudah said...

Lies! This is the complete opposite of the scientific truth! Science has proved that people of color, people with melanin in the body are the true human and those with the pale skin are part Neanderthal and are not fully human. Racism is a bitch and seems to cloud the truth of you spineless, soulless Devils! Get real for once in your life and admit that we are people and you peckerwood ass crackers are not! Point blank end of discussion! Done!!!

King Yudah said...

Blacks have been proven by science to be the only fully human species on this planet while whites are part neanderthal and yet the racists love to switch the truth! Admit it! We are and pale isn't! Just the way the most high made us! Now deal with it!

Anonymous said...


Look around your "kingdom." A place you don't even own. A brown-stained couch scrounged from a ghetto dumpster...a funky coffee table with chunks of wood missing off the corners...a crack pipe, a bong and some rolling papers.

Yeah, you're a king alright. A very small, broke version of king kong. Now go back to the Congo.

- The Realist

Arianus Gh etto name Arianus said...

We decided to keep the nigger race alive by feeding it. Why did Humans decide to mess with natural selection by feeding niggers? Why did Humans decide to mess with the survival of the fittest on earth by feeding niggers?
Science is finding out that niggers are not Human and the scientists are having a hard time lying about the fact that niggers are not Human. Geneticists are finding out through DNA that niggers are not Human and I love it. People will soon enough find out that niggers are not Human. The cultural marxists in the media all but ignore the research that has already started to prove niggers ain't Human and the lie is getting harder to keep and I love that.
Soon Human will have to admit that niggers ain't Human and liberals and democraps will have to decide what side their on.

Anonymous said...

Its just the corruption going around in Africa but i hope that in the future this will all change. Also he blacks as you refer them to have achieved a lot in sports, so yes we did achieve something. If it weren't for the "blacks", some Olympic medals white countries have won, wouldn't even exist because the "blacks" wouldn't do it.

heartly yolo said...

If the so called niggers aren't human, where did the white people come from then? Did they just spawn on earth and started reproducing ?
Even the Americans who seem so proud of themselves aren't even Americans. They originated from Europe and they were kicked out by the king because the were criminals. They took over were the Red Indians were living and those Red Indians have negro-characteristics. And that's not he only lace where we see negro-characteristics, even in in East-Asia you'll find them.
It's not because the so-called blacks in America and Africa aren't want you like them to be that you can say that they aren't human. Even now that the police in America is killing of black people, that is normal for white people to kill other races so you're telling me that that's normal for "humans" to do.

Adam said...

2013 bureau of prison statistics for the US are 2.2 million incarcerated individuals 975,382 of which were "black". Thats not 90%

Adam said...

Anybody who earns tips for a living whether it be as a delivery person or server (or whatever) can tell you 100% that less than 20% of blacks tip anything at all and only 5% or less tip average or above average

Adam said...

If you're hispanic unless your ancestors were indigenous for centuries you can probably trace your ancestry back to Europe. Hispanics are wonderful, smart, industrious people

John said...

In July, an internal South African police force audit revealed that 1,448 police employees, including a major general, 10 brigadiers, 21 colonels, 43 lieutenant colonels, 10 majors, 163 captains and 706 warrant officers, had undisclosed criminal convictions for murder, attempted murder, homicide, rape, attempted rape, assault, aiding and abetting, theft, breaking and entering, drug trafficking, kidnapping, robbery, malicious damage to property, and domestic violence. The vast majority were top brass. The same audit found that there were “serious challenges” regarding the management of discipline in the department.

In recent years, the police force has become internationally notorious for its brutality and corruption. Nine policemen were arrested earlier this year for murder, but only after a video surfaced showing them tying a man to a van and dragging him through the streets before killing him. And in May, a policeman was caught on tape pimping a policewoman to a man in a mall parking lot.

Fact of Life: Whites Are Targeted

And as bad as it is for South Africans in general, if you are an Afrikaner farmer, it is worse.

“The white farmers are being targeted,” said the South African woman. “But the government won’t do anything about it.”

Again, the statistics confirm what she said.

Last year, South Africa had an astoundingly high murder rate of 31.9 per 100,000 people, according to police statistics. That is almost 20 times the murder rate of Canada, 27 times the rate in the United Kingdom, and more than 30 times the rate in Australia or New Zealand. South Africa’s murder rate is almost twice as high as Rwanda, Chad, Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe.

But for white farmers in South Africa, the murder rate is 99 per 100,000!

That makes farming in South Africa the most dangerous profession in the world—if you are white! For black farmers, the murder rate is the average.

White farmers are twice as likely to be murdered as South African police officers, and that is saying a lot. Their station in life—growing crops, raising livestock and being white—is more dangerous than working in a mine, welding steel on a skyscraper, or working as an offshore oil rigger.

Genocide Watch, an international monitoring agency, says there is no doubt that white farmers are being targeted. South Africa sits at stage five out of eight on its warning indicator. This is actually a slight improvement from August 2012, when the international organization warned the country was in the “preparation stage” in the genocide process. Stage seven is “extermination.” The group noted that high-ranking African National Congress (ANC) government officials were using racial epithets in a “campaign of state-sponsored dehumanization of the white population as a whole.” It warned that politicians were sanctioning gang-organized hate crimes against whites, with the goal of “terrorizing whites through fear of genocidal annihilation.”

White Afrikaner farmers face unprovoked brutality and disproportionately high numbers of victims who are tortured and mutilated—burned with hot pokers, scalded with boiling water poured down their throats, hacked apart. Yet prominent ANC politicians, including President Zuma, sing hate songs in public that have lyrics glorifying the killing of white farmers.

Mustangtali said...

Dogs and wolves are a poor example, given that dogs were never wolves. They did a study trying to domesticate wolf pups and had to give them back at 4 months old because they were too wild, and could not be tamed. The people in Africa cling to their way of life out of refusal, not lack of ability. Statistics are just numbers, so here's a thought: if you have just one male running around with many, let's say 10, unsuspecting women, and he has 1 child with each and disappears, you now have 10 children who can possibly grow up to behave the same way, and it spreads from there. You fail to point out however, that there are some good black families that do the right things. Or how many white teens are having children out of marriage and abandoning them. Perhaps it is something else in society causing it, birth control being highly suspect, but the general attitude of people not caring anymore and the push to atheism certainly plays a role. I think you need to reevaluate what it is that makes us human, our humanity, above all, which judging by this post, you could use to work on.

Anonymous said...

If whiteman had never visited Africa, and only discovered today, the Africans would still be living like they were hundred of years ago. Negroids are close to the bonobo chimpanzee than Europeans, that's a scientific fact.

Anonymous said...

I despise these blacks.

But, answer this: why are white people so stupid that they keep helping them, feeding them, inviting more of them into their country? Watching them play sports and listening to their rap music?

Asians, for example, would never sink that low, and you know it.

So there actually is a defect within that white race that makes you accept them. Whites are responsible for the spread and proliferation of black people. Fact. They would have long ago been confined to Africa where they could chuck spears at each other all day long.

Julian Davis said...

I found an absolute gold mine with this blog. I haven't laughed so hard in years. You provided not a single piece of evidence or reputable reference to back your claim. Instead you used irrelevant examples to try and illustrate a point. You had not a single scientific argument to back up your theory that black people aren't human. I have to applaud you though. Even with no evidence you were still able to pull in so much support. I do have to question the mental state of your supporters though. I ponder at how one can claim not to be racist, yet still express such a genuine dislike for a certain race. I probably read "nigger" more times in this blog than i ever heard the word said in my whole life.

Anonymous said...

Julian Davis sounds like a nigger name.

You don't need science to figure out that niggers aren't human. It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure it out. Hell, LARRY HOLMES could figure that out. Spend some time with niggers, in a nigger neighborhood. Then spend some time with white people. Notice the difference?

- The Realist

Anonymous said...

All you white people can say whatever to feel good about yourself. But deep down inside you guys know who were the first men,women and children in this beautiful place we call Earth. Nothing you guys do that will ever top that. We created you. This why two black couple can give birth to a white child. But two white couple has never give birth to a black child. Because you can not recreated your creater. You guys should always remember we don't need you to have you. We can simpley create you.That the power of being black. That just one of the reasons you guys hate us but the same time evoy us so bad. We was here first. And the last to leave Earth. Check the internet. The White race is dying off already. If you try to end your creater. You will end up ending yourself.

Anonymous said...

Dear Medvec,
I just spent several hours reading the 600+ comments to your blog. You are clearly an above average intelligence individual. I think you wrote this out of boredom. It is understandable for non blacks to despise blacks, for many reasons. The black race are the worlds retarded children. They will never be able to care for themselves (as a whole) and will forever need to be cared for by white people, whether in white countries or in Africa. However, they are human.

chase davila said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Anonymous said...

I agree that Blacks are mostly subhumans and that is why mixing wih Blacks have only produced more subhumans mongrels that are infesting Asia, Middle East, Africa ans south America.

Those subhumans from Asia, Africa and middle east have been inflicting us with their filthy subhuman characteristics throughout history.
Those asiatics for example are one of the most cruel subhumans, besides blacks, tend to also have many brutal black characteristics but many people feel afraid to point it out because abusive Asians tend to dumb us down with their exploitative, oppressive economy and oppressive asiatic culture.

Mixing with subhuman blacks have been a disaster to most of us since time immemorial.

Anonymous said...

It is funny when people say that dogs are the same species as wolves. Wolves are scientifically known by their Latin name as Canis lupus, whereas the dog is known as Canis familiaris, or "Familiar Canine". Yes, they are part of the same genus and can interbreed with each other to produce fertile offspring, but this doesn't make them the same animal. Same with Homo sapiens and Homo africanus: same genus, different species. I wish more people looked at facts rather than opinions. This is a serious issue in this "post-truth" world we live in today.

Unknown said...

But is it any better high 5 to call black disadvantaged...that is racism....any evolutionary view separates all race...but only one view is fair and equil...creation or gods view

Anonymous said...

Do you still stand by this?

Diamed said...

Yes of course. Nothing has changed about the objective facts, so why would my opinion change?

Anonymous said...

Idk maybe I guessed maybe your conclusions changed from the evidence or whatever or have a different attitude on the topic than years ago

Anonymous said...

Black Africans historically and culturally lived no different from native Americans Australian aborigines and pacific islanders who just lived ancient tribal ways of life such as hunting gathering fishing mask and body painting oral story telling huts and teepees etc. Thats all.

Anonymous said...

Some of these facts are technically not true. Africans did have metalworking(Benin bronzes), domesticated animals(Guinea fowl) and a written language(nsibidi). Also voodoo is an official religion

Anonymous said...

This is mostly just a problem of semantics. The definition of a species is organisms that can interbreed but scientists break that rule all the time. So I believe either scientists should just start following the rules or come up with a new definition of what a species is. What’s your opinion?

Diamed said...

I don't think blacks deserve to share a pedestal with the rest of us as 'the highest life forms on Earth.' Human is a special designation for a special type of animal that is ruled by reason and conscience instead of bare instincts. Blacks fall short of that honor, so they should stop being classified as the same species. Through their behavior, they have shown over and over again that we have nothing in common. When you consider the hundreds of thousands of ridiculous species categories among other creatures, like moths with slightly different wing decoration patterns, all of whom yes, can interbreed with each other, it proves that scientists are only classifying blacks and non-blacks as a single species in order to provide an artificial and unearned boost to black people's dignity.

If we could just stop this claptrap about 'we're all human,' and 'we all have basic human rights,' and look at reality closely, we could realize that no, in fact, we aren't all human and no, we don't all deserve basic human rights. This is a fraud forced on us with zero factual support. It's just a scientific hoodwink via double standards that aren't applied anywhere else in the animal kingdom.

Anonymous said...

So you believe black are completely devoid of humanity and don’t deserve rights?

Anonymous said...

What’s your definition of a species? Just wanna ask

Diamed said...

Blacks have feelings, and thus deserve to not be treated inhumanely, just like dogs or dolphins. But that shouldn't make them deserving of equality when they clearly aren't equal. The human rights dogma is that everyone has equal rights. It's the same problem with retards or schizophrenics. Obviously retards aren't human and don't deserve equal human rights and yet the 'we're all human' crowd insists they are.

Humans are rational animals. There is no rationality in the retarded, insane, or people who act impulsively in order to satisfy primitive desires. So why are they classified as human?

My definition of species would be any group of organisms that can be shown to have made a decisive break with all other groups. For instance, Rome is a decisive break from mud huts. Giraffes are a decisive break from zebras. Zebras are not a decisive break from horses. You can tell at a glance the tremendous differences between a triceratops and a stegosaurus.

Anonymous said...

Really nit picky but technically all hominids are human, it’s not just a word for Homo sapiens. The word homo is Latin for human. Homo erectus and Neanderthals are labelled archaic human

Unknown said...

Can you elaborate on the infallibility of human "reason and conscience" and the intrinsically inerrant nature of "scientific facts"?

No human created itself, therefore, what makes a human know more than its Creator? If a creation was good enough for the Creator, what endows a human to judge another creation?

A human has limited senses, limited perception - and furthermore degrades over the span of less than a hundred years considerably; how can the science it creates with these senses, even collectively, be "objective" and immune to personal bias; the mechanism by which it perceives the world is inherently biased in self-preservation, and filtered through the lens of its personal experiences and anxieties - how can any absolute confidence be held in anything arrived at by human reason therefore, especially with egregious examples of human "social" corruption under moneyed influence?

Much could be said about your blog but, I think it all comes back to these two premises, and I'd like to see what your subjective reasoning is on those two points.

Diamed said...

It's true that nothing could be as it seems and all our reasoning and perceiving abilities could be wrong, but where does that leave you? If you can't trust your ability to perceive and infer things accurately, there is no truth or meaning to life. Everything is equal. Any action you take could be good or bad, who knows? If you admit you aren't capable of making rational decisions you may as well commit suicide, as there's nothing left to life.

I choose to believe that what I'm seeing is real and I choose to believe in a deterministic world where yes, A really does lead to B, patterns of behavior exist, etc, because anything else is madness/nihilism.

Humorously enough, if you really do believe we are incapable of making any judgments about anything, then being bigoted against random groups is just as good an idea as any other. Who's to say bigotry isn't right in this new topsy-turvy world where anything goes?

Unknown said...

I hope the Creator blesses this message so that it can be more effective than my own ramblings.

"" I did say earlier that our 5 senses degrade, are easily fooled and not an infallible method of determining truth. However the body is merely an instrument for interacting with the physical world; the consciousness lives within, and continues to exist even if a person is in a debilitated state. The consciousness has thought of its own, and by remembering the first thoughts one can arrive at certain things that are absolutely true.

"" The soul aided by the holy spirit actually knows instinctively what is good and what is bad. Observing a young baby, one sees that its natural predisposition is to love and share joy. At the age of 18 months, before it reaches the so-called "terrible" state, it initially is an extremely loving, empathetic creature. It cries when it sees another child in pain, shares freely, has no concept of "self". It is inherently social and built to empathize, and even has extremely high levels of concern for all living things. If it does something destructive, it is without the intent to damage. When one inflicts damage, there is always a sense of "guilt" - undeniable, only repressible. I would invite your readers to consider if what I just wrote actually strikes them as true. The soul already is built to gravitate and gravitate strongly towards moral truth; it actually takes intentional obfuscation to effect moral divergence from truth. The result always involves spiritual pain - subjectively felt, not objectively sensed.

"I...madness/nihilism." For me, it doesn't follow that anything else is madness/nihilism; for me what follows is simply the humble conclusion that, I do not remember how I got here and I have limited control over external occurrences; however, at every juncture, I’ve an awareness of better and worse moral choices; my response is the only thing I control and am responsible for. There is accountability for what one can control. Since there are early emotions associated with right and wrong, there is accountability. This is common to children of various ethnicities; I’ve seen identical behavior in at an early age.

"Humorously...goes?" The world is certainly topsy-turvy in that, we don't control very much. Even if you were sincerely bigoted and not just making an edifying pretense - maybe it would be a right choice for you subjectively, because ultimately, you would learn from it; the result of poor choices typically manifests for the people engaging in those choices, even within the span of their natural lives. Not that this is the only type of suffering, or that every suffering is the result of a moral divergence - perhaps some is given simply to develop the soul to overcome fear of suffering and bolster faith - but, certainly it does appear that those who express so-called bigoted perspectives tend to wind up suffering a natural consequence of the isolation they seek, and at times this suffering can be great. Of course we can choose any path, but it is probably the spark of the Creator in the remainder of humanity that would stand on looking aghast and that innate empathy that would try to pull the divergent back onto a better path - simply because, Creation shares a little bit of the love of the Creator, and as something that loves itself, invests even to its seeming detriment in every straying piece, until the whole is restored.

Nihilism appears like a logical conclusion, but human feeling testifies against it. One can only deny to others that one has these feelings; it is a more difficult task to sustain that denial to one's own self. Do you?

«Oldest ‹Older   601 – 636 of 636   Newer› Newest»