How to Save the World Without Harming a Single Hair on Anyone's Head

As a moral principle, it is fatuous to say nothing can be done if it means having to hurt someone. This objection is ridiculous, when the benefit outweighs the cost there is no reason not to hurt someone. However, potential racists, especially women, may find this moral holdup simply overpowering. They would like things to be different, they would like everything we promise, but they'd rather all lay down and die, they'd rather close their eyes and wish all their worries away, than harm a single other person. As a thought experiment, couldn't we at least try to soothe these people and coddle their ridiculously oversensitive moral compasses? If we could save the whole world without harming a single person, surely then they would start helping us and join in the salvation and survival of our own people? The people who are largely their friends, lovers, fellow believers at church, classmates, family, and the progenitors of their culture? Even in this majority minority America, whites mostly stick to themselves and de facto segregation is present everywhere. Whites Want what we have to offer. They guiltily indulge in the joys of monoracialism and monoculturalism, keeping it secret from everyone how comfortable and happy they feel in the company of their own. Overly effiminate, or simply raised with the ridiculous squeamishness of the modern world, their objection isn't our ends but our means. For those of us who realize the ends justify the means, this is just nonsense. For those who don't, it is a brick wall they can not cross.

Let's take this in context. As we speak, 40,000 Americans die each year to car accidents. Americans as a collective have agreed that the death of 40,000 Americans, many of them children or teenagers just starting the brightness of their lives, are worth sacrificing each year to the convenience of being able to drive everywhere. The economy would be hampered without cars to get us places quickly carrying large loads, and therefore, each year we sacrifice 40,000 virgins to the dark car god in the sky. Whether people consciously or unconsciously decide their deaths are 'worth' it, their blood is on our hands. Under a different social system, not a single one of them would have to die. We could have required only public transportation with much higher safety margins, or torn down all our cities and lived in villages where everything can be reached on foot, etc. Instead we cavalierly declared there were plenty of people to spare and let them die, I want to be able to drive to work, to my girlfriend's, to the bar, to the grocery store. Infants who never themselves chose to be driving anywhere are dying in car wrecks, wholly innocent and undeserving of death, victims of parents dragging them into the car and locking them into baby seats they can't escape, and an uncaring public who does nothing to protect them!

Therefore, let's not take people's compassion and chivalry to seriously. They're perfectly willing to see people die, so long as it cannot directly be traced back to their decision. The collectivization of risk Americans create on the roads makes them feel unresponsible for these 40,000 deaths each year, and yet the people are still dead. I honestly believe that if an inner racist circle went around killing 40,000 people a year and then listing in the obituary "death by car accident" in order to create a racist society and achieve our goals, the rest of society would gladly accept the state of their country and be absolutely happy with the way things were. Relist those people as 'liquidated as enemies of the state' and they would go on riots about how horrible things were. "What's important is the principle of the thing," etc. No, what's important to them is they feel good about themselves. They are good, decent, honorable people who would never hurt anyone, and need everyone else to know this. So no, I don't take their conscientous objections seriously. I don't see anyone campaigning to stop car traffic on our streets, I don't see any conscientous objectors refusing to drive because 'miles are murder.' Just a lot of self-righteous egoists.

To these self-righteous egoists, I say, (okay beginning super-sacharine mode:) welcome aboard! There's nothing to fear here! We have a Plan that will take care of everyone and leave everyone happy. You see, it's simple. White countries pay a handsome annual sum to legal immigrants and return them to their native lands. The money will make them welcome guests of their host country. Illegal immigrants will be deported. A mixed race and diversity loving multicultural hippy-land will be given territory and formal independence, a new Swaziland as it were. We will carve it out of our own countries, out of sheer generosity, and hand it over infrastructure intact, debt free, free of charge. Politely but firmly, all those who simply wouldn't feel at home in a racist society will be moved to their new homeland. There they can have whatever laws, whatever religions, whatever immigration policies they want. Children born into our racist societies who cannot stand our way of doing things and wish to rebel and embrace their human race brothers, are more than welcome to move to their respective Swazilands as well. And children stuck in Swaziland of pure race and good credentials, can also leave their parents and rejoin Racism-land. This way no one anywhere is hurt, everyone gets exactly what they want in life. Freedom for all, peace, joy, love, the whole works. Since most of the immigrants came to our lands to seek money so they could feed their families etc, they should have no objections to having that same money in their own countries, where they feel more at home anyway. After all, subjecting foreigners to constant racism all the time we are told absolutely ruins their lives. In their own country, surrounded by people who know and love them and understand their feelings and language, all that can be restored to its natural state. This way, they'll just have money too. They'll be the local princes and benefactors of their city block. Furthermore, the destabilizing drug wars that wrack south America and central asia will be gone, because thankfully Racism-land will patrol its borders and not allow any further drugs or drug use in their borders. The market will crash, and all those mean thugs who terrorize your countries will be out of a job. They'll have to pick up the car or garment industry and leave your lands in peace. This not only helps out the third world, but now the vulnerable children of Racism-land can breathe easy. No longer will a constant supply of drugs and an open cultural pushing of drug use tempt them into addiction and self-destruction. We offer them a much more wholesome life, with much higher ends, that can occupy their boredom, depression, and ennui. We will have stable homes with good role models that make drug use sound as silly as it really is. Tens of thousands of lives a year will be saved both in Racism-land and the third world by this change alone. A wonder what controlled borders will do for you.

Where will we get this money you ask? Well I'm glad you asked. The Plan has taken care of everything. Initially, it will be simple. We will go into debt, as massive as it takes, even if it means half our paychecks for generations, for the great blessing of our ensured survival, peace, and prosperity of the future. With the knife off of our throats and the jackboot off of our heads, currently angry-white-males will be much more generous and caring than you ever imagined. We can even be friends--albeit penpals. However, something miraculous will occur that will make the money almost generate itself. You see, without all those billions spent on health care, education, higher housing prices, strained water and electricity costs, an imperialist foreign policy interfering with the inner workings of other countries, crime, law enforcement, drug use, alcoholism---well you get the idea. It will turn out money we never knew we had will be sprouting up everywhere. We will be saving trillions a year on the high costs diversity led us into. Affirmative action alone being gone, and merit actually getting the positions they deserve, truly the possibilities are endless. And we will pass all these savings off to the generous immigrants who left our shores. Rather than greedily hogging these wonderful benefits immigrants gave us by leaving, we will pass all these profits back to those who deserve it, the kind and understanding non-whites and mixed-whites and diversity-lovers who all moved back to Mexico or joined the socialist utopia Swazilands. And we whites, we don't even need a thank you. We've been poor before, much poorer than half our paychecks, and we were still happy then--because we had each other. And when love is in the air, the rest can take care of itself. You know?

This isn't all though. If you sign up for the Plan (tm) today, we will throw in a 'third-world-revitalization project' that will not only make your transitions back to your countries and new swazilands safe and affordable, but will actually change the entire world for the better and lift all boats. Here is how it will go. Incredibly bright and caring whites will be paid to go into your countries and start translating our wisdom and technology into daily results for your own people. We will cure your diseases, raise the efficiency of your farms, teach you how to take care of your environment, build roads, hospitals, schools, anything you want or need. You may not have the company of all those dastardly racist whites who kept oppressing you and keeping you down, but aside from that, it will be like a home away from home. All we ask is you don't rape or eat our emissarries we send over there expressly to help you. Naturally, we will offer methods to prevent AIDS like safe sex, we will help employ women and increase their ability to farm or get educations or property so they aren't locked into childbearing prisons, and we will offer new medical technologies that for instance fertilize a dozen of your eggs, genetically test to see which of them is the brightest, healthiest, and most beautiful, and then That child will be the fruit of your loins. Entirely natural, entirely you, just the best in you. What anyone would want for their children. And as the years go by and your countries improve, and our technologies improve, together, we can offer you even more generous and helpful products, like designer babies, fusion power for cheap, robot chore-doers, robot girlfriends for when you just absolutely need to rape someone like the good old days with built in life-like screaming and kicking. I have so much confidence in the genius of white accomplishment, that you can bet almost every christmas you will find some new cool thing under the tree courtesy of us. Courtesy of our love and gratitude for all of you who decided not to come here, or who decided to go back to where you properly belong among your own people. Maybe if East Asia is feeling generous (but you know how those curmudgeons are) they could chip in too, but in any event, the whole world down to the very last slum in India will be better. Cleaner. Safer. Richer. Better Fed. More environmentally sustainable. With prettier girls than you ever saw before, smarter, more peaceful and industrious boys than you ever hoped for, and all of it with the same skin colors you are used to and the same festive dances and holidays. The only difference you'll see is that your race is better at being itself. It will be whatever you want it to be, just as we'll be whatever we want to be. A truer expression of our race than ever before. That is the joy of looking inwards instead of outwards, a world of development instead of competition, love not hate.

And someday, whites will simply leave, and you can have the entire world to yourselves. We will leave a big thank you card and flowers in our gardens. We know how hard it is on you that so much land wasn't inhabited by your people and that we racist-lands unfortunately, were still physical beings who needed our own space to breathe and play in. But we will make our amends for that too. We will put our space program back on track, just like the entriprising white Americans, Germans, and Russians who got us there in the first place, and this time we'll find earth-like planets to inhabit, in stars far far away, and we'll simply pick up and go. This is maybe 500, maybe 1,000, maybe 10,000 years away. But is that so bad? Jesus was born 2,000 years ago and people are still patiently waiting for his resurrection. So what's another 2,000 years of waiting for whites to leave? The land is patient, it has lived and breathed for 4 billion years. The sun is patient, it will still be shining on the green banks of the mississippi and the Rhine and the Volga and the Danube and the St. Lawrence 2,000 years from now when you arrive. The snow is patient, it will fall each winter for you to make snow forts in, sled down, or whatever you wish to do. It will be like we were never there, all intact and ready for the third world to own everything. Consider us renters, just taking a small break on our sojourn. Don't worry, we won't come back. As you can see, all our interests are ultimately compatible. In the end, all we ever wanted to do was give you things. We're just those kinds of guys. All you have to do is let us give you what we can, and keep what we must, and you will see how very reasonable and peaceful we always were. It's your choice, your call. The ball is in your court. Can't we all just get along?

(end super-sacharine mode)

In truth, all whites need is a healthy mindset, an enterprising spirit, their already quite remarkable genetic code kept intact, and a land of their own to translate those goods into a concrete reality around them. This land must be sufficient such that no amount of military might or economic sanctions from the non-white would could bring us under. We will also need a sort of barrier against mental attacks, something that prevents the same seducing theories to enter our brains and infect us again. Jews, especially, and jewish thinking and all previous jewish thought, should never be allowed back into the white world. Yes this means a restriction of free speech, and no I don't care. After two thousand years of lies we really don't need to know what jews will be saying next. I can pretty much guess anyway. We have been the hosts to those seductive smooth talking parasites for 2,000 years now and I personally am sick of it. Country after country has collapsed under the weight of their speeches, and enough is enough. They killed 100 million people with their communism, and the new egalitarianism of Boaz and multiculti crowd of the ADL, SPLC, ACLU etc are directly responsible for the genocide of the entire white race on earth. Not to mention the horrendous atrocities done to Germans, many not even living in Germany by the American Jews like Morgenthau and the Soviet Jews like Ehrenburg. Now, referring back to our bare essentials, I honestly think with these safeguards in place, whites will flourish like never before. The scientific method and the Enlightenment, after the horrible derailment of the jews, will be set back on course to the glorious heaven we were about to create for ourselves. Cleanse our system of the poisons and the degeneracy, start the engine back and watch it play out the way it was meant to the first time. Whatever costs that are imposed on us by keeping the rest of the world around and constantly helping them out is nothing in the face of an unobstructed path we can boldly walk forward into--united and assured of our goodness. Basically, if you get what you really want, it's okay to give up what you never really needed. And emotions which are currently ragged by how much abuse we have taken, will in time be at peace when surrounded by the comfort and joy shining in all the white faces in our pure white cities and towns and media all around us. In time we will forget any animosity we had for anyone, and it will feel good to help the same people that were out to destroy us. However, something will be different than last time, because this time we will realize we are one people, united under a common destiny and common nature, that can never be shared with outsiders. This time we will love ourselves too much to defile that pact with anyone else. Like a monogamous marriage, whites will realize any addition of extra lovers only dilutes the love they already have. That more isn't better, and sometimes, a secret is better left kept. A sense of the sacred will touch our hearts and keep us pure, where hate currently keeps us burning for the same separation. And that is something boy and girl alike, effiminate as they come, can share, and not feel guilty for. I dearly hope.

The Liberals are right--we should abolish race after all:

"Suppose everything you say is true. Do you take satisfaction in it being true? Does it make you happy? Or do you wish it weren't true and wish it could be some other way?"

This is an interesting question, which gets down to the nub of why, exactly, are we crusaders for the race.

My response to this question is I wish what I believed weren't the case, and that it could be some other way. I have been forced into my beliefs by necessity, resisting the implications mightily as I'm dragged through goalpost after goalpost.

There's plenty of room for condemning evil in this world, without having to go around looking for categorical foes who we can smash with unrelenting fury, all the way down to the infants in their cradles. However if we spare an entire city of evil-doers because ten innocent nice infants are crawling around in it, it is our innocents, our good people, our women and children who are ravished and pursued with unrelenting fury. In a struggle for survival that has reached the highest pitch, we don't have the luxury to sort out the good from the bad. Life must come first, justice later. Do I want it to be this way? Am I glad that I can smash infants in cradles and still be moral? That I could bayonet a pregnant woman and still be moral? I'm not glad about it. And yet there it is.

Am I glad that I have 140 IQ and am living in a world average IQ of 90 or so? That a greater IQ gap exists between me and africans than africans and dogs? Not really. Am I glad that life is easier for me, that I can do things others can't, that ultimately all wealth, power, prestige, and even good health and long life belong as a birthright to me and not to anyone else due to a different arrangement of genes? Not really. The things I love most in life, I wish everyone could have. It takes nothing from me if another person reads the same book as me, listens to the same song, or admires the same mountains. I miss the lost camaraderie. I don't have any special need to rule others, the only particular benefit is more leisure time. Machines could serve that role much better. I'd rather the world were much, much smarter. I feel like then we could sit down and reason issues out like civilized men. I feel like we could all understand reality a little better, and treat each other better, and treat ourselves better. I'm not happy that nature has dropped the ball and populated the earth with mostly primitive savages and that there is nothing I can do to make them smarter or better (once they are born) because it's all genetic. How could I be?

The same on a larger scale. Am I glad whites are the best at everything and no one equals us, am I glad the rest of the world is largely a sanctum for the BEAST, a ravening satanic force that unmakes everything it touches and specializes in every living being carrying as much suffering, starvation, disease, stupidity, cruelty and hopelessness and helplessness as it can? No, I'm not glad. I wish all races were free of the horrible fate they cause themselves. I wish they were free of the genes that make them that way. I wish they had the genes that make us like who we are. That's why I wish the whole world were populated with whites, with genes like ours, so that sort of suffering, that level of misfortune, can't happen again.

And of course, I am not happy with whites either. It seems to me, we would all be happier if we were elves. Am I happy that there are no elves in the universe to supplant our top of the totem pole? Am I glad we have unchallenged mastery of the earth because we are the only half-sane gene combination on earth? No, it's rather sad. If only elves existed, such flawed, truly wretched beings as the white race would no longer have to carry the burden of our existence. I've lived long enough to see that everything about humans, including whites, is so full of evil, that I could wish anyone, anywhere, to replace us, if only they could do better. The cheating, the vulgarity, the needless anger and conflict, the lying, the fickleness, the selfishness, the hypocrisy. . .how could I be happy that we, we flawed vessels, are the best? Who could be?

While we continuously drum into the heads of newbies that these are facts, this is reality, and we must accept reality and act on it without delay, could it also be that we are drumming ourselves in our heads that these are the facts, this is reality, and we must accept reality and act on it without delay? We are the unwilling executors of God's cruel design. We are the inheritors of a broken world and a fallen man. It's outrageous that genocide is all that's left to us. That killing babies is the right decision. That sterilizing billions of women is the best step for the happiness of the world. That even if we meet millions of people, it's doubtful whether we could love a single one because all two million are such scum, such utter filth, have hurt someone else so terribly and so viciously and unfairly and selfishly and unashamedly, that no matter how good they look at first inevitably the truth comes out and they are damned? Who could have chosen this? Who could be glad it works out this way?

Here are the facts. Only a few men have lived truly ideal lives. These people have met every expectation of virtue, been happy their whole lives, accomplished something incredible that will have an enduring wondrous impact on the world, and transcended all limits that tried to balk them. Another, still small segment has lived relatively good lives, been somewhat happy, accomplished something worthwhile that meant something to at least somebody. Everyone else is a net negative. They should never have been born. For their sake, and ours, it would have been better. They are born in the nest of Satan and live out their entire lives serving and suffering his diabolical designs. It would be better if every child born had a loving family, a healthy physique, a beautiful body, a temptationless mind that can overcome all bestial instincts, a supportive culture, a ready cadre of friends and confidantes, a life partner, a guardian angel, an all powerful God arranging his stay in heaven, the intellect to fathom the universe and the heart to love it.

Instead we are a hodgepodge of usually mutant genes full of genetic flaws that will inevitably kill us, we have stupid looking noses, we are too fat, we have no muscles, our eyesight is poor, our parents fight too much or split up long ago, we can't find a stable relationship for the life of us, diseases are trying to infect us and eat us from the inside out, tigers and sharks are prowling around trying to dismember us and eat us from outside, the sun is burning us, the lack of sun is freezing us, strangers plot night and day how to decapitate us, steal our money, or rape us, while friends we should have had ignore abandon and betray us. There is no God but a lot of evidence for Satan, there is no heaven but a lot of evidence for the fact we're already living in Hell, with just the right flavor of hope to keep us kicking so we never buck the system and escape it all through death. There are no guardian angels but you can bet the entire world is a giant conspiracy of false history, false morality, and false reality making sure it will use and abuse you your whole life without you ever finding out about it. The day you were born, around five people thought you were beautiful and would do anything for you. 6.5 billion wondered how much use they could get from you with various lies, threats, flatteries or bribes. Those are long odds.

So am I happy to know how irretrievably fucked we are? That there is no salvation? That the world cannot be made better but is certainly being made worse? That only evil can fight evil and good is simply too naive for this hellhole of a planet? That our children will curse the day they were ever born and our grandchildren will never be born? No I'm not happy.

It's important to accept the facts for what they are. The only way anything can improve, is for us to correctly diagnose what is wrong in the first place. Genetics are the source of all our woes, so genetics must be the path out of them. There's no need to glorify or approve of how things are though. There's no need to exult in reality. It's actually horribly depressing. There's no need to give Satan a pat on the back for the fine work he's done. If there were a way to give every baby the list of goods I mentioned above, I'd want them, whether they're black yellow red or brown. If there were a way for whites and non-whites to coexist peacefully, I'd want to, whether they're black yellow red or brown. If there were a way for whites and non-whites to work together to create new heights of accomplishment, I'd want to, whether they're black yellow red or brown. If a black and a white mixed together produced a high elf, I'd bless the couple and ask for pictures. That just isn't reality. I didn't make the world, and I hate it, and I want to change it--so don't blame me for it!

If the environmentalists would just admit the truth, accept the truth, if the nurture crowd would ever stop condemning us and start working with us, we could change the world. With eugenics and genetic engineering, we could make every race better. We could abolish race entirely and make ourselves into an entirely new species, we could be equal, we could be good, we could be loving, compassionate, peaceful, empathetic, anything they wanted. With whites in charge, we could teach uplifting, decent values and ideals. We could give children fair, honest cultures that cultivate our virtues. We could immerse our people in the products of our highest minds instead of our most lizard-like instincts. Instead they give us the bitter, absurd job of choosing between ourselves and everyone else. The last light of hope, and all the people our hope could shine upon. The last good thing on earth, and all the good on earth we could do. It's a false either-or. And therefore, let's not be happy with reality. Let's insist we are all the victims of reality. That no one can be happy with the way things stand. That it revolts us as much as the next guy. And that we racists, we whites, are the only people who can ever do anything about it. The truth may be agonizing, disgusting, depressing, and cruel---but the truth will set mankind free. After we've discovered what evolution wants, what our instincts are asking for, what in the game of life would lead us to victory -- there is still one more question, and that is, should we continue playing by someone else's rules? Or should we take matters into our own hands? The races are different, and can never be the same? Then let's abolish race. That's something liberals can agree with, right? They've spent the last century trying. Let's abolish race the only possible way, by rewriting it from the ground up, one SNP at a time, one child at a time. Just to sweeten the pot, we can plant a tree each time in some urban blighted area and build a non-polluting tidal power plant underneath the ocean. Surely this is better than bayoneting babies? Come on liberals. Let's make up.

A 'Big Tent' or a 'Fanatical Few'

Among white nationalists, the longest and most never-ending debate is whether we should be a "Big Tent" party or a "Fanatical Few" party. The reason why the debate continues is it is unresolvable. We have no worked examples of either strategy working. We can make arguments for the likelihood of one being more successful than the other, but so long as it stays in the realm of pure theory it is doubtful anyone will be convinced by the other side. No one can say with complete assurance their side is correct, since none of us can predict the future, much less the various parallel futures that each modification to our philosophy/agenda would entail. It is all murky and beset with unanswerable questions. The hidden springs of psyche and will are impossible to fathom, at least with current day technology. In a single individual or a great mass of millions, the question "what made you do that?" or "why did you feel that way?" are psychological questions constantly asked and rarely answered, simply because people are such complex, multifaceted, self-contradictory beings. So when someone makes a prediction like, "people will respond in X manner if we do Y." Or "Z more people will join the cause if we uphold W." We are all just speculating. We have no idea what will really happen, in the end history tends to make itself without anyone's help pushing it along. A trigger point will occur and people will 'snap,' at which point all their beliefs and ideals will be abolished and they will become capable of thinking or doing anything. Or this trigger point will not occur and we will all simply fade away and die. This is also unknown, but since there's no point considering a hopeless future, as all choices become moot down that trajectory, we must base our assumptions on the hopeful one. Nevertheless, if we do not have worked examples of the future, we do have worked examples of the past. If past events do not perfectly correlate to today's, we can still estimate that events will play out at least similarly to what happened last time. History is better Psychology than Psychology. It's the largest case study on humanity ever made.

I have studied history practically as thoroughly as it is possible to study. I find it one of the most rewarding mental pursuits known to man, and the best basis for any politics or philosophy is one deeply rooted in a sense of history. The most sublime thoughts are those that interweave past, present, and future into one four dimensional object. Ignoring ancestors and offspring is the most common banality, the dumbest and most common error, of the popular mind.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P5h4PFBuzvw

I like this song, not so much for its lyrics, as just the chorus: 'branch, stem, shoots, we need roots.' It's beautiful. No matter how many times I listen to it, the power of its message is just electric. We should never forget how every tree, every flower, every stalk of grain, is supported by an invisible foundation. For a civilization, that is our history. For a people, their ancestry.

By 'big tent' I will define a strategy that says we should be willing to compromise as many issues as necessary to gain the approval of the majority so that a peaceful transition can occur by persuasion alone.

By 'fanatical few' I will define a strategy that says we should never compromise a single issue such that every single member is absolutely loyal to the Program which we will then kill and die for against all enemies.

Or more simply as Gohan says: It is all or nothing, there is no inbetween!

So the question is, from a historical perspective, have revolutions traditionally come about from a 'big tent' or a 'fanatical few?' Readers should already know the answer to this question. It has always, always been a fanatical few. The Nazi party started with like 10 people. The bolsheviks were hardly any larger. Muhammed declared war on the world with around 100 followers, most of his life he only had 10 or so, just his own family. Jesus also was never popular, nor Joseph Smith's mormonism. Persecuted and eventually killed, the Prophet barely had a village of followers. And yet every time, these tiny minorities who eschewed size and popularity for an unswerving dedication to their extreme radical revolutionary beliefs, overcame. This isn't to say that many other fanatical revolutionaries tried to succeed and failed, but that is meaningless when you compare it to the fact that no 'big tent' revolution has ever occurred. For those of us uninterested in theory and just hoping for results, what can I say. Look at the evidence. 300 spartans stopped the Persian Empire (yes yes I know thousands more helped but let's not get bogged down in distracting details). 300(? again don't care about the details) Texans at the Alamo won themselves a whole new country against overwhelming odds. Heroes and martyrs are powerful. Dying for your beliefs is powerful. Fighting, violently, for your beliefs is powerful. Numbers, pile them up in the millions, tens of millions, are all meaningless. Life is always a clash of Wills. Those who desire victory the most, will win it. Will is the most powerful force on earth. Relying on numbers of half-hearted, bickering, disunited pacisfist moderates, is like multiplying 100 trillion by 0. Sure it looks strong at first, but when the actual calculation is performed, all you end up with is nothing. Zero. In Mumbai, 10 terrorists killed 300 Indians and held a nation of 1 billion hostage for days. Those ten people had what the one billion lacked, the will to fight and die for their beliefs. 19 hijackers, with the aid of willpower, killed 3,000 americans and destroyed one trillion dollars of our economy. The life work of millions of people was negated by just 19. The difference was will. I propose in the capital of Vinland we build a statue, like the roman gods of old that adorned the Capitol of Rome, of our new goddess Will. She should have one knee lifted and be leaning slightly forward, with widespread wings, a sword lifted high diagonally pointing up and forward, and a head tilted to the sky, with the apparent wish to conquer it all. Everything above her, where she's looking. The entire cosmos. Our cause will go nowhere without will. The secret ingredient all other successful revolutions had was not popularity, it was not inclusiveness, it was not money or smarts or majority approval or good publicity---it was nothing the big tenters tout as so important and it was nothing big tenters promise they can deliver if we follow their lead.

The secret ingredient to successful revolutions is will, and the only path to that secret power that overturns all odds, kicks it to the curb and pierces the heavens--(watch Gurren Lagann if you haven't yet and you will understand, again, the power of Will and how wonderful Japanese culture is and how much we suffer from the lack of it)--is inspiring a fanatical few. Muslims told Muhammed they knew endorsing him was tantamount to a declaration of war on the entire world. They didn't mean metaphorically, for the next hundreds of years, they enacted his beliefs, attacking, always outnumbered and outarmed and outspent, in a storm of fanaticism that conquered half the world. Mormons had to trek across half the US and set up camp in a desert, they had to abandon their traditional morality and endorse plural marriage -- only the fanatics, only the extremists, were willing. The power of those fanatics and extremists delivered them an entire state and 2% of US population. The Nazis had to fight it out on the streets with the communist youth to even give a speech, there was no space for moderates here. They led a failed putsch on the government, failed, and weren't deterred. Eventually they took on the entire world as enemies kept piling up on top of them, and instead of being deterred only redoubled their efforts. They defended the streets of Berlin block by block, making the Communists pay with hundreds of thousands of more lives long after it was obvious Nazi Germany was doomed and could never win, while playing Wagner's GOTTERDAMERUNG on the public radio for God's sake. Can you IMAGINE the willpower that nation had? Is it any wonder their most famous movie is titled "Triumph of the Will?" Give people a radical, extremist viewpoint, something they can really get behind. Something that Matters. Something that does not talk about taxes or stock market prices or nihilist nothings, but cares about something real. Something you can give your life too, and be happy as the blood seeps out of your wounds. Something whose song, book, or flag can make you cry to hear. The Fanatical Few always have this, and thus always have the brave men willing to die for it. The Big Tents, dissolute and decadent and worst of all-- bougiousie--never have anything. No one has ever died for 'individualism,' 'lower taxes,' 'human rights,' ad nauseum. A Big Tent philosophy that seeks to please everyone pleases none, it can not fire its tepid citizens and lukewarm souls. Nothing is ever the 'breaking point.' There will always be a rationalization on why we must stay peaceful, democratic, christian, individualist, etc. The same old failed policies that make you popular but never change the world.

I am a 'Fanatical Few.' I like the Turner Diaries. It doesn't scare or shock me, it inspires me. I stand ready for the call, to kill and die, without mercy, so long as I could be shown some reasonable path to victory thereby. Thomas Paine was another 'Fanatical Few,' and he had this to write to his 'big tenter' colleagues:

"THESE are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated."

Even more can be learned from what follows however, what a close historical parrallel we find! :

"Why is it that the enemy have left the New England provinces, and made these middle ones the seat of war? The answer is easy: New England is not infested with Tories, and we are. I have been tender in raising the cry against these men, and used numberless arguments to show them their danger, but it will not do to sacrifice a world either to their folly or their baseness. The period is now arrived, in which either they or we must change our sentiments, or one or both must fall. And what is a Tory? Good God! What is he? I should not be afraid to go with a hundred Whigs against a thousand Tories, were they to attempt to get into arms. Every Tory is a coward; for servile, slavish, self-interested fear is the foundation of Toryism; and a man under such influence, though he may be cruel, never can be brave."

Go through that paragraph and substitute 'why has the third world left their lands and come to our white shores? The answer is easy: China is not infested with Liberals, and we are.'

'I should not be afraid to go with a hundred Racists against a thousand Liberals--every liberal is a coward; for servile, slavish, self-interested whining is the foundation of Liberalism; and a man under such influence, though he may be cruel, never can be brave.'

"I once felt all that kind of anger, which a man ought to feel, against the mean principles that are held by the Tories: a noted one, who kept a tavern at Amboy, was standing at his door, with as pretty a child in his hand, about eight or nine years old, as I ever saw, and after speaking his mind as freely as he thought was prudent, finished with this unfatherly expression, "Well! give me peace in my day." Not a man lives on the continent but fully believes that a separation must some time or other finally take place, and a generous parent should have said, "If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace;" and this single reflection, well applied, is sufficient to awaken every man to duty."

Need I even translate? If there must be trouble, let it be in my day, that my child may have peace;" and this single reflection, well applied, is sufficient to awaken every man to duty. What has changed?

"Quitting this class of men, I turn with the warm ardor of a friend to those who have nobly stood, and are yet determined to stand the matter out: I call not upon a few, but upon all: not on this state or that state, but on every state: up and help us; lay your shoulders to the wheel; better have too much force than too little, when so great an object is at stake."

Better too much force than too little, when so great an object is at stake. Is there any greater object at stake than the survival of your race? Of, more specifically, the white race, the greatest and most blessed race of all? Can there be any higher stakes? If so, should we err on the side of too little force and not actually prevail or secure our land, leaving it to degenerate under the same perversion and decadence that polluted it in the first place due to an insufficient rooting out of the basic seeds of our destruction, or on the side of too much force and let the remainder of suffering fall upon our aggressors, our dispossesers, our invaders rapists thieves slanderers and murderers? Paine knew the answer!

"There are cases which cannot be overdone by language, and this is one. There are persons, too, who see not the full extent of the evil which threatens them; they solace themselves with hopes that the enemy, if he succeed, will be merciful. It is the madness of folly, to expect mercy from those who have refused to do justice; and even mercy, where conquest is the object, is only a trick of war; the cunning of the fox is as murderous as the violence of the wolf, and we ought to guard equally against both."

So true! You foolish, foolish liberals. You swedish foreign minister, may you rot in hell forever, with your "We must be nice to the muslims so that when they are the majority they will be nice to us." Do not expect mercy from the BEAST. Did the blacks show us mercy in Zimbabwe, in South Africa? Did the Jews show the Russians, the Ukrainians, anyone mercy in the USSR? Did the Allies show Germany mercy after the war was already over, when they went on to slaughter and rape millions of Germans all across Europe regardless? Do the muslims show any land they conquer mercy? Fools, fools! We know the hearts of our minorities already. If they are willing to prosecute hate crimes on only white people, give affirmative action to everyone but white people, tax white people to spend on themselves, engage in endless crime on white people, demonize white people with lies about stuff like the holocaust to every child 5 and up--in short if they are so willing to be unjust to us now, why do you think they will treat us better as the majority? Already life is intolerable, insufferable, chokingly infuriating due to these diversities. What possible relief do you expect 50 years from now?

"By perseverance and fortitude we have the prospect of a glorious issue; by cowardice and submission, the sad choice of a variety of evils — a ravaged country — a depopulated city — habitations without safety, and slavery without hope — our homes turned into barracks and bawdy-houses for Hessians, and a future race to provide for, whose fathers we shall doubt of. Look on this picture and weep over it! and if there yet remains one thoughtless wretch who believes it not, let him suffer it unlamented."

Is this really 1776? This is 2008! Substitute Hessians for Negroes and the formula is complete--a new race to provide for, whose fathers we shall doubt of! Our country will be ravaged, the white flight from all our major cities has already begun, none of us have any safety in the diverse new world, and all of us live in slavery without hope to a system that robs us of everything, even our right to life, even our pride and self respect, to hand all over to the new preferred invader!

And so it goes. History is the same story over and over. A fanatical few, wielding their force of will and appealing to the force of reason, to the timid, cowardly, teeming masses of the big tent many, in a desperate attempt to forestall Satan's victory. As Edmund Burke said:

"For evil to prevail all that is necessary is for good men to do nothing."

It is the do-nothing big tent crowd that has never and will never prevail against evil. It is the active, ferocious, violent fanatical few who have won revolution after revolution and triumphed again and again. Sometimes on the side of evil, sometimes on the side of good, depending on whether the fanaticsm was based on truth or lies. But fanaticism at all times was the only currency of any value. Fanatics make history, everyone else is simply the parchment upon which history is written. Fanatics at least have a chance to be both right and victorious. Moderates can never be either, first because this world is Naturally violent and fanatical, evolution is Naturally extreme, and thus moderation has no place in our universe, and second because they never have the guts to fight anyway. What does it matter if 80% of Americans oppose illegal immigration? I have even seen polls of 30% that directly say they don't like blacks. This 80%, this 30%, is doing nothing and will do nothing to stop the death of their race. Meanwhile .0001%, a group of 20 people or so, are able to change the world.

Dissecting the Holocaust-PS

One additional important aspect of why the Holocaust must be a myth I nearly forgot:

The fact that instead of fairly debating these issues, laws have been made specifically banning the discussion of this one event in history. One can question anything else they like, but it is illegal to question the historical events of the Holocaust. The truth does not need any additional legal defense. The truth can always be vindicated through honest debate and fact-checking and evidence gathering, why then all the laws snuffing debate if the Holocaust is true? By covering it up, the Holocaust mythmakers show their hand. They know any honest investigation of the Holocaust would reveal it's a lie, and are desperate to prevent this at all costs.

Nothing could make Dissecting the Holocaust more believable than the fact that many of its authors right now have died in prison or currently rot in prison, while many more are being hunted around the world in the hopes of also silencing them. This book, which the authors have paid for in their own martyrdom, is their gift to us the rest of the world, at the price of their own lives. Such unselfish devotion to the truth is not found among anyone but people of the highest character, and such evil mistreatment of honest thinkers (much like Galileo) trying to have their say always denotes the vile character of their oppressors. The idea that a factual question, or a fact, can be good or evil, flies in the face of all morality. Facts are facts, truth is truth, and it can never be wrong, or illegal, to believe the facts or the truth. This insanity is what persecuted Galileo and burned Bruno at the stake, it is the insanity that assaulted Watson for stating IQ gaps exist between the races, and it is the same insanity that has deprived Zundel and Rudolf of their freedom. Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Conscience, the independence of free scientific inquiry, a 1984 like control of the past, and all the rest is at stake. Their treatment of Holocaust Revisionists is absolutely unacceptable, and it clearly divides the sides of this factual question, between good and evil. When only evil people believe the Holocaust happened, and only good people believe it didn't, it becomes more and more obvious which side we should be on. Aside from whether the holocaust is true or not, we must all stand up and demand: FREE ALL THOUGHT CRIMINALS!

Dissecting the Holocaust

http://www.vho.org/GB/Books/dth/

For anyone with an open mind, the book is free and available for download at the above link. Dissecting the Holocaust takes on one of the seminal events of history and the justification of a horrendous number of anti-hate, anti-white laws that has followed ever since. In short, the Holocaust never happened, but due to the myth of the holocaust, whites are facing worldwide genocide every day. Because of this, it's vitally important to expose the myth of the holocaust and disarm all the anti-white haters who use it as the bludgeon in every argument and debate to perpetually cow us into submission. Obviously the best way to find out for yourself on this issue is to just read the book. But for those without such an attention span, I will lay out all the facts that seem most central and vital to me, and my take on this vital issue.

1: Truth is the first casualty of war. No one should ever believe what is said when two nations are at war. War propoganda is a tool used to demonize the other side and inspire your own, everyone is using it and no one can expect official government sources or press releases during the war to have any relation to the truth. Victors write the history books and so again it is ridiculous to expect anything but self-serving myths to emerge out of show trials like the Nuremburg Trials. Truth is not an object during or after a war, simply assigning guilt and marginalizing the enemy is the task of every written word so that people can callously hate their foes and courageously believe in their cause. Practically every war the US has ever fought has been accompanied with lies. In WWI German atrocity stories were also trotted out with no relation to the facts, all later refuted, and the Versailles treaty ridiculously determined that Germany was solely to blame for WWI and incredible penalties against it were all justified thereby. The 2003 Iraq war was justified with lies about WMD that did not exist, as well as more atrocity stories that turned out to all be made up like people being thrown into 'plastic shredders.' The Gulf of Tomkin was a ruse engineered by the US to get into the Vietnam War. The sinking of the Lusitania was a setup by Churchill and Wilson to get the US into WWI. The civilian ship was loaded with war armaments, illegal under any rules of war, and then sent to sail slowly in known U-boat infested waters until it was sunk so that the US could declame against Germany for murdering 'innocent civilians.' The innocent civilians were of course dupes of their own government and the blood was on their hands, but even to this day it has never been admitted. Go back as far as you like, to the Spanish-American war and the Maine: "You get me the pictures, I'll get you the war." Or to the Mexican-American war where Polk stationed a small detachment of troops in disputed territory in the hopes that they would be killed so he could escalate to war, all of which played out exactly as he planned. There is not a single war where everything is at it seems or one side is wholly innocent and the other wholly to blame. Propoganda regularly dishes out this truth in every single conflict, it is incumbent upon the thinking public to not keep falling for it every time, and cleave to the truth with skepticism in the face of any wartime propoganda lies. Everything stated about a war that shines poorly on the other side or well on your own must therefore be viewed with extreme skepticism. The burden of proof is much higher than when there is no motive to lie and no conflict that might encourage such lies.

2: To make matters worse, though the USA and the UK are no schmucks at wartime propoganda and lies themselves, they are mere children compared to Stalin and the USSR. The communist propoganda during the war was outrageous and ridiculous, but was given a free pass and believed by the world because it suited our needs, namely, it demonized Germany which was exactly what we wanted to hear. Before and after the war, the USSR was continuously caught in ridiculous lies. For instance, the USSR simply denied the Ukraine famine even happened, much less their deliberate measures to reduce the food supply that caused it. The USSR reported vast economic growth every year while not even being able to feed their people, and so on. The Katyn massacre of Polish officers was blamed on Nazis during the war but has been definitively proven to be at the hands of the soviets. This lie told during the war is the thread that if tugged on would unravel the entire yarn of Soviet propoganda and now that the USSR has been caught in this lie, it is incumbent on everyone to ask what other lies they might still be hiding. Nothing ever told from 1918-1990 has any connection to the truth, people who lived in the former soviet union and eastern bloc can all vouch and attest to this, and yet Soviet Anti-Nazi propoganda during WWII is given a free pass and accepted uncritically as gospel truth. This cannot be permitted for those interested in the truth, not just what demonizes their foes and aggrandizes themselves during a war.

3: Two other sides to the wartime and after-war propoganda of the Holocaust exist. One is the eyewitness testimony of Jews, the other the confessions of captured Nazis. Neither of these sources are to be taken at face value either, as their credibility must also be viewed with the extreme skepticism of any interested party. It is in the interest of Jews that the Holocaust happened and the numbers killed be as high as possible. It is in the interest of jews that the most sadistic tortures imaginable were perpetrated by Nazi germany. Not only did it give them a free pass on the foreign scene in the founding of Israel (a naked land grab from the natives through force of arms that is still ongoing), but it is regularly trotted out as the reason why racism, discrimination, exclusion, 'hate,' and the like can never be allowed to occur. Jews need the Holocaust to support all of their anti-white liberal policies, their hate speech laws, their immigration laws, their welfare state laws, affirmative action, and everything else. Without the Holocaust they could not point to the 'inevitable end of x policy is Auschwitz.' Therefore Jewish eyewitness testimony must all be viewed through the lens of 'who benefits?' And--"why might Jews wish that gentiles believe this?" This does not mean all jewish eyewitness testimony is a priori false just because they have a motive to lie or misrepresent, it is simply meant to establish that we must view everything said with extreme skepticism and not take what they say on blind faith. The actual ridiculousness of the testimony and its conflict with physical reality disproves the testimony, their motive for lying is the reason we should investigate in the first place.

Nazi German confessions are of course inadmissable due to the fact they were under duress when they said that and still are today. Many Nazis were given two simple choices, confess and affirm the Holocaust myth, or face execution as a 'war criminal.' Torture was also regularly used to extract confessions, many Nazis died mysteriously soon after their confessions, never able to set the story straight, and since even to this day denying the Holocaust only 'affirms' your 'unrepetant guilt' and gives you a harsher penalty, Nazis have no motive to tell the truth. Most Nazis were in no position to know whether the Holocaust happened or not first hand, and have been deceived by the propoganda as much as the next guy. None of their admissions can be viewed with anything but extreme skepticism. One can imagine many Nazis who went to their graves heroically defending the truth and never admitting under any amount of torture the Holocaust lies the Allies, Jews, and Communists were feeding them -- but how could we ever know about them? After the war, the only side allowed access to these Nazis were their captors, the only stories published the ones they wanted us to hear. It is hopeless to try and retrieve any semblance of the truth from the Nazis after the war, whatever they say is moot. The only honest information to be gained from Nazis is what they were saying during the war before they were captive and under duress. Luckily, Germany's fixation with documenting everything gives us a nearly complete record of everything Nazis thought, said, and did during the war. From their own mouths, not under duress or any motive to lie, we gain a far different story.

Accepting the standardized story with No corroborating evidence and No reflection simply because it is so well known and believed is therefore untenable. No pursuer of the truth can afford to believe an account built by so many parties interested in deceit. Not a single one of the holocaust mythmakers has any motive to tell the truth, they all have extreme motivations to lie, to simply take their word for what happened is irrational and unfair to the defeated party. Billions of people believe in the Bible and miracles, even though no corroborating evidence exists for this, billions believe in the Quran and Muhammed's miracles, but again no corroborating evidence exists. The fact that billions believe in the Holocaust says nothing about how true it is, because again we face the fact that no corroborating evidence exists. It is simply reported as fact, no evidence, none, supports it.

Let us look to the three possible sources of evidence:

1. Physical evidence.
2. Documentation.
3. Hearsay.

In any court the testimony of witnesses is not taken very seriously, in a murder case no one could ever be convicted without some corroborating evidence to go along with the witness's account. If eyewitness testimony is sufficient to convict people, then the Salem Witch Trials, and the Witch Trials in general across all Europe, were the height of judicial correctness. Not even the collaborative witnessing by 5, 10, or a 100 people all claiming so-and-so was a witch and was tormenting the poor girls through invisible spirits can amount to evidence or proof to convict. When the eyewitness testimony is absurd or physically impossible, its weight is even lower. When it is conflicting all the worse. When the witnesses are recalling events years or decades later, so much the worse. Everyone knows forgetfulness and prejudices warps memories to quite different from what actually occurred. In the end eyewitness testimony is nearly useless to establish anything. Documents at least are recorded at the time and without the motive to convict someone in some trial later. So let us turn to the documentary evidence.

Here again we are faced with an eye-wideningly ludicrous claim: All documentation of the Holocaust was destroyed or covered up in 'code words.' In the hundreds of tons of archives we have of Nazi official correspondence, not a single one refers to the Holocaust or the extermination of the Jews. Holocaust scholars insist it was all happening secretly 'in code,' however there is no reason to believe this except that they wish for it to be true. One could accuse anyone of anything by saying x really means y. The most banal of shopping lists like, "Honey, Celery, Raisins" could really mean "Gas--the--jews," but can that seriously be introduced as evidence of a Holocaust? In addition to this, a few completely abberational documents are produced where Nazis suddenly quite freely discuss their mass extermination of jews in the most pitiless and lighthearted ways. Surrounded by millions of tons of archive material that in no way backs up these claims, either logistically or with matching claims, and given the strange peculiarity of these singular Nazis admitting what everyone else had so carefully destroyed or made sure to speak in 'code words,' it is obvious these documents are forgeries. Allied or Soviet propoganda that could not find any real evidence had to invent its own, but when considered in the context of all written documents by the Nazis, it is ludicrous to believe them true. Millions of pages of text were written by Nazis about their concentration camps. Whether it be hospital records, supply records, camp security measures, construction notices and cost estimates, everything is thoroughly documented. For every one of these documents to reveal a quite innocent non-extermination goal is too much of a coincidence. It's not that all the documents were carefully lying or covered up, this was simply what the concentration camps really were. Occam's razor demands this interpretation.

More powerful than either hearsay or documentary evidence however is forensic evidence. Physical reality tells the truth more than any human word ever said. Reality, unlike humans, cannot lie and thus we can rest securely on fnding out the truth once physical evidence is in our hands. Ludicrously, the Holocaust myth would have us believe that no physical evidence of the Holocaust remains. All of it was made to disappear by the wily Nazis who, through miraculous powers, have killed the jews in such a way that no evidence that they did it can ever be found. This is no longer science. By creating a scenario in which the claim is unfalsifiable, and no evidence need be found, because this somehow just proves all the more that the Holocaust happened and Nazi diabolism, they have left the world of argument and entered the spreading of fairy tales. Time and again we are told that after gassing the jews and burying them in mass graves, they were dug up and burned on open pits that erased all trace of their existence, the ground was covered up and filled in, the gas chambers taken down, etc. This is not credible. All evidence cannot simply cease to exist. Open air fires are not capable of turning everything, including teeth, to ash. The soil would still be disturbed and easily shown to be a mass grave even if no bodies in it remained when dug up again, inevitably some oversight would have left some batch of jews or remains in the earth, and the remaining ash of the burnt bodies and wood would be omnipresent in the camp. None of these traces have been discovered or even looked for, we are simply to take on faith that it happened, and no evidence that it happened remains. If any serious person wished to establish the Holocaust, all he would need to do is dig up Treblinka and see for himself what was there. The fact that the one time this ever occurred, the investigative party truthfully reported no mass graves were found, should give us a clue. Indeed, whenever attempts to find where massacres of jews specifically occurred, no grave-digging ever finds anything. To make matters worse, all the eyewitness testimony describing these open-air fires are physically impossible. Even if one can theoretically construct a way jews were burnt such that no evidence remains, the eyewitness accounts do not agree with this theory. Instead we are told that with just a little bit of wood for kindling, the bodies burnt on their own and massive piles of corpses could simply be set on fire with a match and left to disintigrate themselves. Anyone with the most rudimentary knowledge of cremation knows bodies do not burn themselves to non-existence but require vast amounts of wood/coal etc to supply the heat and fuel. Wood and coal no witness reports they had, which would have been in such massive quantities that it's hard to imagine how no documenation of its procurement or movement exists. The witnesses due to lack of technical expertise clearly messed up and invented lies that sounded good to them, but reality simply does not support.

Another such lie is discoverable for the same reason. Non-technical experts when inventing the Holocaust went with what sounded good but is technically impossible to have happened. 3/4 of all gassed jews, we are told, was done via carbon monoxide poisoning using Diesel engines. These diesel engines connected to various hermetically sealed gas chambers (from as fantastic sources as russians tanks and submarines) in a matter of just 15-30 minutes could gas large quantities of jews all to their assured death, and operated day and night to kill millions of jews, then of course were all dismantled and disappeared before any Allied army could discover them. Here is the problem however:

Diesel engines emit practically no carbon monoxide. Even if you directly placed your mouth on the tailpipe and did nothing but breathe diesel exhaust, you would not die of carbon monoxide poisoning. Not in 30 minutes, not ever! The peculiarities of diesel engines, far above non-technical people's knowledge, means that carbon monoxide content is especially low and oxygen content especially high. Though any other engine could have succeeded, and with 100 to 1,000 times the efficiency, diesel engines cannot. To date no one in any real situation has been documented to have died of diesel engine exhuast poisoning, even in trapped mines, garages, etc. The same is not true of other combustion engines, and wood-gas engines, both used during the war and the natural choice of any Nazi looking to gas anyone. It is impossible to believe they would have made such an elementrary mistake and given themselves such a sysephean, herculean task as mass gassing with diesel engines when better alternatives lay all around them. Nazis could have killed people faster simply leaving them in a hermetically sealed room to suffocate than using diesel fumes. The whole thing, all the eyewitness testimony, all those millions of supposedly gassed people, are therefore a farce. Again, even if one can theoretically construct an efficient gassing system that would have killed millions of jews, none of the eyewitness accounts match this theory, and as pointed out no documentation and no physical evidence of said gassing occurs either. To construct such a theory, one must first deny even any hearsay evidence that would say it happened, much less any other evidence, and then from there you could construct a logically sensible holocaust--unfortunately with no greater relation to the truth than constructing a logically sensible witch trial after throwing out all witness testimony and having no documents or evidence to go with. Sure, such an internally consistent story could be made, but to what purpose? It is not consistent with anything else, and thus must be rejected out of hand.

What of the remaining 1/4 of gassed jews, this time supposedly with Zyklone B? The same problems exist here as elsewhere. Zyklone B was a pesticide used to delouse prisoners and their clothing, this is what all the documentation and physical evidence says it was used for, and what even Holocaust scholars say 98% of it was used for. One must immediately wonder why Nazi extermination camps were using expensive chemicals and gas chambers to try and prevent disease among Jews they were trying to kill as fast as possible in the first place. But setting that aside, the presence of Zyklone B and gas chambers in no way implicates the gassing of jews with Zyklone B. Since again, no mass graves are to be found and no reliable witness testimony can ever be found, there simply isn't any evidence jews were gassed. There is, however, ample evidence that Zyklone B was not used in the very areas Allies and Jews later designated as homocidal gas chambers in Auschwitz. It's quite simple, when HCN (zyklone b) is used in newly built buildings, where wet and cold conditions prevail, it forms a chemical bond with the iron of the building, and becomes an uncleanable stain on the walls-- a color described as 'iron blue,' 'prussian blue,' 'berlin blue,' etc. This well known process is observed in any chemistry textbook and can be repeated as an experiment whenever anyone likes. This very prussian blue stain exists all over the delousing chambers in Auschwitz which even Holocaust scholars claim is the result of delousing and zyklone B gas combining with iron etc--but is completely absent in the gas chambers right nearby that supposedly killed millions (or hundreds of thousands) of jews. Magically, the laws of chemistry cease to apply when Zyklone B is used against humans instead of lice. Germar Rudolf has even taken samples from the supposed gas chambers at Auschwitz and using a chemical analysis, found the wall has no more HCN content than any other building on earth, unlike the prussian blue stained delousing chambers which had 1,000 times as much concentrations. Therefore Zyklone B when used in these chambers somehow became an inert noble gas that did not interact with any of the walls around it, while everywhere else it follows standard predictable chemical laws. Needless to say, it's senseless for Nazis to have used the expensive and dangerous chemical Zyklone B to kill jews with anyway. Carbon Monoxide makes far more sense, as does simply lining jews up and shooting them, etc. Gas chambers were invented solely for their sensationalism, the real life genocides that the Soviets, for instance, perpetrated were much simpler. Shootings, denial of food, shelter, health care, exposure to extreme cold, etc, are so much easier and actual tens of millions were killed in just this way. While people continue to rant on and on about the holocaust and gas chambers, the actual genociders, Stalin and his jewish comissaars, got away with the far simpler, vaster, and actually true genocide that is never once mentioned in any press today. Comparing the two methods, does not your common sense immediately start to wonder why on earth so much trouble was taken in the killing of the jews? Does one wonder why one crime is endlessly harped upon and magnified while the other, much worse by any account, goes completely ignored and downplayed? To make matters worse, eyewitness accounts again report ridiculous things like Germans would open the gas chamber doors and unload all the bodies without any gas masks after just 30 minutes, when they too would have immediately died of Zyklone B poisoning had they done so. A complete lack of knowledge of how Zyklone B interacts with the air, how good the ventilation systems were, etc meant they fancifully believed a minor breeze or an open door would somehow negate the poison gas and allow workers to wander about freely among the corpses. Such routine physically impossible errors give the lie to everything the witnesses say.

Needless to say, no documentation has ever been found showing Nazis procuring or using Zyklone B to gas jews with, nor was there ever enough fuel to cremate all said imaginary jews into non-existence, or even enough working ovens to have undertaken such a colossal task. All of this goes ignored in the standard Holocaust tradition.

What of the vast piles of corpses, or the wasted bodies of liberated Holocaust survivors at camps like Auschwitz? Well, what of them? What relation do a lot of dead bodies, all skeletally thin and wasted, or a bunch of skeletally thin and wasted living prisoners have to gas chambers? The standard holocaust literature says jews were taken from right off the trains to gas chambers and killed within minutes. These people would hardly have found the time to become skeletally thin in the few days of the train transit or before they were gassed, so already we have the problem that all the healthy plump jews we should have found corpses of are missing. What we are looking at, instead, whenever you see the vast piles of contorted skeletal corpses or starving skeletal prisoners, are people who lived a long time slowly succumbing to hunger and disease. Diarehea, typhus, and many other diseases claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands stuck in those concentration camps, which lacked adequate facilities while being far too overcrowded. By 1944/1945, supply lines were so shot up by the Allied bombing campaign that even regular germans were starving, of course nothing could be spared for their concentration camp prisoners! While supplies lasted, medical care and food, sparse as it was, was adequate to sustain life for most of the concentration camp prisoners, but after the genocidal ferocity of the Allied bombing campaign, it's no wonder conditions had quickly deterioated to what we found at the moment of liberation. The same starving-to-death, constantly diseased POW's were found in the Japanese camps at the end of the war. If you read King Rat by Clavell, an eyewitness who lived through japanese internment camp imprisonment, you find the same stories. In Japan as well, bombing had gotten so fierce and supply lines so cut, that they could no longer even feed themselves. By the end of the war only quick intervention by the occupying Admiral saved millions of starving Japanese from very-like concentration camp deaths. One should not find it surprising that in such times of hardship, the prisoners got it worst of all. It does not take extermination camps to produce mass piles of starved diseased corpses, and no one accuses the Japanese of it even though the same was true of their camps. In other, more ancient concentration camps like Andersonville in the Civil War or the Boer camps in the Boer War, similar catastrophes of disease and starvation occurred. It is simply the way reality works when so many people are penned into such a small area with too little food or resources to make it livable. Nothing nefarious or intentional need be supplied, simple neglect and scarcity is enough.

Lastly we come to the problem that six million jews couldn't have died, simply because the discrepancy between jews living before the war and after the war was not that wide. Careful demographic studies by Stanning and others have, as guess-work as the task necessarily is, accounted for all the jews and shown as few as a million, or even a few hundred thousand, dying in the Nazi camps. The rest died in entirely predictable manners: civilians dying in the crossfire or due to economic hardship just like all the other civilians who were stuck in the theatre of war, partisans killed as members of resistance to Nazi occupation, soldiers in the Red Army dying in the heat of battle, polish jews and others dying to the scorched earth and forcible deportation policies of the Great Satan Stalin. None of these obvious reasons are taken into consideration by Holocaust affirmers, so that the number gassed to death by Nazis can be inflated and hyped. Last, no mention is made of emigration before, during, and after the war even though it was so obviously ongoing since it founded the state of Israel after all. Millions of jews left Europe or moved to the USSR or elsewhere and thus we come up with ridiculous numbers like 6, or 7 million jews killed even though worldwide jewish population only takes a much smaller hit between 1941 and 1945.

Israel reputes to have nearly a million holocaust survivors still alive on its soil, circa 1997. If you take ordinarily mortality rates stretching between the dates 1945-1997, you discover that 1 million jews alive today perforce means nearly all the jews survived the Holocaust to reach the year 1945. Again you reach a number lower than 1 million that could have been killed in the camps. Jews' own studies and claims about jewish populations before and after the war refute the possibility of the Holocaust.

With all this in mind, still more reasons come to our minds why the Holocaust couldn't have happened. It simply isn't in the nature of Germans to act so barbarically. It is unprecendented in human history. The same people who produced Goethe and Beethoven could not have produced Aucschwitz. None of their conduct since the war supports that all their elderly generation were such satanists, and so on. It amounts to a massive defamation of the character of Germans and whites in general that we could even have done such an act, never before seen on earth. What are the odds that the greatest horror story known to man, the Holocaust, would be done by whites? We who are so generous, altruisitc, noble, civilized, and kind everywhere else and across all history, we who are repulsed by the atrocious black magic and female circumcision of Africa, the cannibalism and human sacrifice of the Aztecs, the eunech slave raids of the Arabs, the unfeeling starvation genocides of Cambodia and Mao's China, etc--we are the most barbaric of all and committed the worst crime? I think not. It has never been whites who excelled in the inhumanity of man, it has always been whites who helped deter and stamp out such atrocities. The Holocaust simply does not fit our character. Our conduct has never been that violent towards even uncivilized barbarians like the Incas or Africans we came across, instead we immediately went about building them roads and teaching them how to farm and Christianity, etc. The idea that we would start skinning jews and using them as lampshades, washing our bodies with jew-soap, sleeping on jew-hair mattresses, sadistically kill jewish children in front of their mothers, cut off jewess' breasts, etc, is all from another age and surreal.

Though one can imagine that someday whites could feel so aggrieved that no amount of fury and violence would be unreasonable, that was not Hitler's Germany. The holocaust myth is in fact the fastest way to create a real holocaust. Now that it's been done once, there is less incentive to not do it again. After all, it is accepted as normal now. Furthermore, since we already are guilty and blamed or it anyway, we may as well get the full benefit as well as the cost. The myth of the holocaust, so frequently used to say: "If you follow this pro-white policy, you will do another holocaust of jews," is often met with the despairing and frustrated response, "Fine then let us do another Holocaust, if that is what must be done to be pro-white!" These decades of brainwashing have simply made a far more volatile Holocaust all the more certain! We are becoming completely desensitized to the images and accounts, due to the constant pushing of them upon us. Jews are digging their own mass graves.

Previously I stated that to defend Nazi Germany, the Holocaust must not have happened, and some reasonable excuse must be given for their aggressive wars of conquest to the east. Increasingly as I read up on the topics, it becomes easier and easier to see through the lies distorting Nazi Germany's reputation. Though I cannot say the Nazis were nice good people yet, or have no blame in WWII or their decision to round up so many people and put them in such deadly camps in the first place, the picture gets ever murkier the more one looks. This definitely calls for another post in the future. One thing is certain, however, and that is any honest white nationalist should never backstab their Nazi friends. At this point, with the Holocaust not even having happened, it is an entirely defensible view to be a Nazi or Neo-Nazi, and it is outrageous to attack people over such minimally important charges as 'you started a war' when Napoleon, Prince Charles the V, the Hapsburgs, Henry's attempted conquest of France for England, etc were all doing the same. Aggressive war is hardly new nor is it morally repugnant to the point of schism and internicene name-calling. Nazis, whether their views perfectly match your own or not, are not the amoral monsters they were made out to be. That is simply a libel. From here on out it is just honest differences of opinion, none of which matter in the least compared to the opinion of the left---ie that race does not exist and the white race should not exist. Attacking Nazis to our right for some trivial difference rather than the monstrous genocidal views of Jews like Ignatiev who desire to 'abolish the white race' and Sontag who claim 'whites are the cancer of human history,' etc simply reveals your character, and not the moral superiority you so desire. White racists of any stripe are criticially important and valuable, they should not be mocked for standing up courageously for their beliefs, and every attempt to speak as a united front against immigration, affirmative action, tax slavery, and media-distorted demonization, must be made.

The importance of knowing the holocaust is a myth cannot be understated. It is a precious tool that both redeems our views and the cause, showing they do not inevitably lead to Auschwitz, and it shows yet again the insane, evil hostility against us Jews, communists, and even our own Allied governments hold. The fact that jews, communists, and governments everywhere propogate the holocaust myth, their evidence based mainly on wartime and soviet propoganda, and ram it down all our children's throats and then for the rest of time every day remind whites how evil they are for the holocaust, and how they can never be allowed to have racial consciousness again since we so 'misused' it last time, is an entirely unjustified attack. If the malevolence and ill intent of our enemies was not before discernible, their pushing of the holocaust myth is simply one more fact showing the way. Though whites never had it in for jews, jews clearly have it in for us. Those twin facts must steel us to what must be done in the future, whether it be suffering, or causing suffering, there is simply no negotiating or compromising with the likes of our foes. They are absolutely vile for what they've done, and they have absolutely no excuse for doing it. What a damning double truth that statement holds.

Topics NOT Worth Writing About

A list of things that don't matter and don't affect whatsoever the 14 words: "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children."

1. The economy. I don't care what the stock market is at today. I don't care what interest rates are at. I don't care what the unemployment rate is at. I don't care what consumer spending levels are at. If the economy tanked to 1/100th what it is today, we'd still be as rich as the greeks or the romans, who still managed to be the greatest people on earth. The whole topic is infuriatingly materialistic, soulless, short-sighted and stupid.

2. Conflicts between non-whites. Who gives a shit? This includes Israel and Palestine, or India and Pakistan, I don't give a single damn who dies or suffers there, it has nothing to do with the white race or the 14 words. The only foreign policy we should have is to always, ALWAYS side with whites against non-whites, no matter what, and to stop all wars between whites we possibly can. We do not have to save the Kurds and the Shias from Saddam's evil sunnis. We do not have to save south vietnam from north vietnam, we do not have to save darfur blacks from arabs, we don't have to save the Hutus from the Tutsis, and it doesn't matter in the least who is in the right and who is in the wrong, which side justice prefers, or who we should feel sorry for. It is as important as the wars between ant colonies. Sure, they rage all around us, some ant empires are nearly continents wide, and are in the midst of ant world wars. Watch me not care. Taking your race's side against all comers shows a healthy love of your race. Nothing else should matter to us. It only weakens our position, our one and only position, the 14 words.

3. Major League Sports. It's unbelievable how passionate whites get cheering for non-white athletes just because they belong to the 'Cougars' or the 'Badgers.' Those sports are a tether chaining you to multi-racial hell, cut them. Those sports are a false community that brings everyone together every saturday, but to do the most pointless waste of time ever, watch a ball go back and forth on a field. By God. If just one stadium full of whites got together to, say, overthrow the government, patrol the Mexican-American border, or secede with their own sparsely populated state--if just one stadium full of whites got together to simply raise their children with better values!--we could've solved all our problems long ago! But no, we cheer frantically as the 'Lions' take on the 'Tigers' instead.

4. TV. It's all drivel, and it's all propoganda, and it's all porn. Get your news and entertainment off the internet. It's cheaper, it's better, and it isn't loaded with anti-white subliminal messages in every show and every commercial. You get to participate in it instead of mindlessly watch it, there are real live people on the other side not actors, and all the music and literature and art of all the great masters is available for free at the click of a button. Watch anime, where normal values are still taught and nothing at all is said against whites, straights, or males, the story is just allowed to for ONCE flow naturally and be itself. And, by the way, Saiyans become super saiyans by changing their hair to blonde and their eyes to blue!

5. Celebrities. Who made them celebrities? Jewish media, jewish press, jewish magazines, jewish tv. Nothing celebrities do matter. They are poster children for the liberal left, they have nothing whatsoever to offer, they know nothing about anything outside of their job. They are contemptible mouthpieces, empty-suits, figureheads for their jewish handlers.

6. Anything Health related. It doesn't matter if we die at 75 or 78. It doesn't matter if we die at all. What matters is if the RACE lives or dies, and a race doesn't die of disease, or of old age. A race dies of invasion, miscegenation, demoralization, atomization, below replacement birth rates. The diseases of the race are not cancer, AIDS, alzheimer's, or diabetes. Fuck all of them, it doesn't matter one bit if you catch all four. What matters is we all fight for the health of our race, and make sure it never dies. The next time some new breathless study comes out showing vitamin E gives you 20% fewer heart attacks, IGNORE it and go on about your daily business. The next time you could get some extra spiffy health care coverage, ignore it and donate to the cause instead! Or have a kid and give your money to something that will actually outlast your mortal frame! There already is a cure for old age, it's called a family! It's called your children. Anyone with the opportunity to have one, anyone so blessed with a wife and home and money to spare, think of how blessed you are and think of what you can do for your people by having one more.

7. Elections. We lose no matter who wins, so who cares? All the parties of every nation are hellbent on genociding the white race. Don't legitimize any of them. It is pointless arguing about it, it is like taking sides between two non-whites. Does your political party support the 14 words? No? Okay then walk away. This war will not be determined by elections. Politics is important, if you are thinking Plato's Republic or Aristotle's Politics. It is fine to argue about the Constitution of Vinland and our future white homeland. As for the politics of America, walk away, that isn't our country, I don't give a damn what happens to it. The worse the better, the sooner it goes to hell the sooner we can leave.

8. Global Warming. I don't want to hear one word about the perils of global warming raising temperatures 2 degrees over 300 years or whatever fucking bullshit the UN currently prognosticates when the entire white race is set to die in 100 years, and will be a minority in their own homelands in 50 years, even in the heart of Europe. Do not mount a campaign to save the earth when you do not even intend for us to be there when it happens. Do not pretend to care about long term trends and their harmful effects when you are watching dysgenic devolution occurring right in front of you, when you are staring at below replacement birth rates that are halving our population every generation, when you are looking at the wholesale destruction of five hundred million people through territory destruction and economic enslavement and assure us this 'trend' isn't important and has no long term effects.

9. Isolated Events that in no way represent the larger picture. Do not talk to me about Matthew Shepherd or Boyd whoever, when you refuse to discuss the Wichita Massacre, the Knoxville Horror, or the 37,000 white women raped every year by black savages. Do not complain about the evil KKK lynchings while neglecting to mention the 3,000 farm murders of innocent white South African farmers by black savages. Do not talk about the Holocaust without mentioning the far greater butchery jews did to the Ukraine in the 1930's. Do not cry over Hiroshima without mentioning the Rape of Nanjing or the Bataan Death March. Do not talk about the Crusades without mentioning the preceding Jihads! Do not talk to me about anything in isolation. I am ready to discuss everything weighed up even-handedly, the whole length and breadth of history, every single event in its proper place in the Pattern--I am not here to listen to bullshit propoganda fed to us as 'education.'

10. Anything personal. The white race is more important than how you feel. We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children. Backbiting, totem pole games, posturing, moral superiority, attention-seeking, name-calling, ad honimem, conflating the worth of what someone says with the worth of the speaker, bullying, censoring, slandering, etc can come after.

Here's a song worth writing about, a topic worth caring about, an emotion worth feeling:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX6CAxmQxrY

Enjoy! A happy thanksgiving and a merry Christmas to all.